On 12/5/2024 4:33 PM, cyclintom wrote:
On Wed Dec 4 23:40:18 2024 Frank Krygowski wrote:
We all know how incredibly stupid you are but https://www.usinflationcalculator.com/inflation/historical-inflation-rates/ shows the actual inflation rates during Obama, Trump and Biden.
and as usual, you post a link that disproves your own claim
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Ave
2009 0.0 0.2 -0.4 -0.7 -1.3 -1.4 -2.1 -1.5 -1.3 -0.2 1.8 2.7
-0.4
2010 2.6 2.1 2.3 2.2 2.0 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.5 1.6
2011 1.6 2.1 2.7 3.2 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.8 3.9 3.5 3.4 3.0 3.2
2012 2.9 2.9 2.7 2.3 1.7 1.7 1.4 1.7 2.0 2.2 1.8 1.7 2.1
2013 1.6 2.0 1.5 1.1 1.4 1.8 2.0 1.5 1.2 1.0 1.2 1.5 1.5
2014 1.6 1.1 1.5 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.0 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.3 0.8 1.6
2015 -0.1 0.0 -0.1 -0.2 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.5 0.7 0.1
2016 1.4 1.0 0.9 1.1 1.0 1.0 0.8 1.1 1.5 1.6 1.7 2.1 1.3
Care to point out anywhere in those 8 years that would have driven the >>>> average to 25%
--
Add xx to reply
Perhaps you'd like to let us know why you do not understand that average inflation values are not additive but multiplicative?
Oh good grief! No, Tom, you're math is wrong.
Pick any row. Do the cumulative multiplication for the twelve months,
that you seem to be claiming is appropriate.
Then tell us how it generates the number in the last column - the one
labeled "Ave" for "Average."
Or even simpler, note all the rows have values that are higher than the
"Ave" listing.
You're looking like an ignorant fool yet again; this time, with simple
math.
Frank again shows why he was fired as a plant engineer. He doesn't understand basic mathematics.
That chart shows the AVERAGE inflation value for the previous YEAR. Since the BUDGET was set by the PREVIOUS Congress, the inflations goes for Obama from 2010 to 2017.
Moreover the average inflation rate from 2010 is increased OVER the inflation rate of the following year.If you wanted to talk about the cumulative inflation during Obama's
terms, you should have used the word "cumulative."
And even if you did, your claim of 25% [cumulative] inflation was off by nearly a factor of two. Do the numbers, Tom. They work out to about 14%.
Here's an interesting coincidence: If you run the numbers for cumulative inflation under G.W.Bush, immediately before Obama, you _do_ find a cumulative value nearly twice as large as Obama's! (I get 24.4%.)
Oddly, Tom doesn't complain about the W.Bush years.
10 million illegal aliens have been getting free medical care <implied - from federal funding>
On 1/25/2025 7:31 PM, cyclintom wrote:
... anytime you think you can shut me up, you coward, you're welcome to try.
Nobody can shut you up. You spew nonsense daily, and ignore all evidence
that your spewing is imaginary and crazy. You refuse to be embarrassed
by your own endless idiocy, and you pretend you haven't been repeatedly
shown to be a fool.
That's exactly why Jay Beattie left this discussion group. It's exactly
why Jobst Brandt called you out many times. It's why all the most
intelligent members of this group are so frequently saying you're
absolutely, totally wrong on so many widely different points.
Your only benefit is that you constantly demonstrate how daft a person
and his views can be. Those who ever agree with you on any topic
probably wish you'd go away, because you make them look crazy by
association.
On 1/25/2025 7:31 PM, cyclintom wrote:
... anytime you think you can shut me up, you coward, you're welcome
to try.
Nobody can shut you up. You spew nonsense daily, and ignore all evidence
that your spewing is imaginary and crazy. You refuse to be embarrassed
by your own endless idiocy, and you pretend you haven't been repeatedly
shown to be a fool.
That's exactly why Jay Beattie left this discussion group. It's exactly
why Jobst Brandt called you out many times. It's why all the most
intelligent members of this group are so frequently saying you're
absolutely, totally wrong on so many widely different points.
Your only benefit is that you constantly demonstrate how daft a person
and his views can be. Those who ever agree with you on any topic
probably wish you'd go away, because you make them look crazy by
association.
On 1/25/2025 3:45 PM, cyclintom wrote:
On Thu Dec 5 20:22:37 2024 Frank Krygowski wrote:
If you wanted to talk about the cumulative inflation during Obama's
terms, you should have used the word "cumulative."
And even if you did, your claim of 25% [cumulative] inflation was off by >>> nearly a factor of two. Do the numbers, Tom. They work out to about 14%. >>>
Here's an interesting coincidence: If you run the numbers for cumulative >>> inflation under G.W.Bush, immediately before Obama, you _do_ find a
cumulative value nearly twice as large as Obama's! (I get 24.4%.)
Oddly, Tom doesn't complain about the W.Bush years.
Krygowski, on a good day you're a fool.
As usual, Tom gets blown out of the water by mathematics so he descends
into insults.
Your math was totally wrong. Admit it and shut up.
On Thu Dec 5 03:44:06 2024 Catrike Ryder wrote:
On Wed, 4 Dec 2024 23:27:15 -0500, Frank Krygowski
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 12/4/2024 5:45 PM, Tom Kunich wrote:
On Wed, 04 Dec 2024 14:44:12 -0500, Frank Krygowski wrote:
On 12/4/2024 12:47 PM, cyclintom wrote:
On Wed Dec 4 00:05:00 2024 Frank Krygowski wrote:
Bike transmissions: Derailleurs are easy to understand. Internal gear >>>>>>> hubs are more complicated. (When I was teaching, I had our machinist >>>>>>> do a cutaway of a Sturmey-Archer AW hub and mount it on a display >>>>>>> stand near an explanatory poster, so interested students could see >>>>>>> what made it work.)So this is something you consider "super complicated" is it? All
Rohloff 14 speed gear hubs are an order of magnitude more complicated >>>>>>> than AWs. But this new gizmo makes a Rohloff look like child's play. >>>>>>> It's a true continuously variable transmission, with an infinite >>>>>>> number of gear ratios, that is completely gear-based. No slipping >>>>>>> surfaces, and supposedly minimal friction losses.
Here's the link to the half hour explanation video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mWJHI7UHuys You may want to start at >>>>>>> about 14:30 before returning to the beginning to digest the
super-complicated explanation of it's operation.
No info in the video about prototype weight, efficiency, etc.
anyoine should have needed is to see the levers slidding in the slots >>>>>> to grasped the method that was used to both make the tranmission
continuously variable and limit the upper and lower ratios. But I
suppose you needed a half hour showing gears to grasp the idea.
Yes, Tom, I do consider that mechanism to be super complicated.
Of course, all of us here are familiar with your status as a mechanical >>>>> genius. ... um, one whose cranks fall off his bike, whose handlebars >>>>> slip, whose seatpost slips, whose derailleurs frequently don't work, who >>>>> needs special "non-stretch" cables ...
It doesn't surprise me at all that a man that was fired as a plant
engineer believes a constant velocity transmission with cam operated
sliding ration adjusters would be "very complicated."
I was never fired from any job. I was actively recruited for each of my
two teaching positions.
Easy to say, pretty difficult to prove... and given that you are a
known liar......
I designed most of
the hardware for many instruments from the ProPette, the Progroup which >>>> added a turn table with test tubes besides the 3 dimentional plate
mechanism to the mechanical heart valve in my heart/lung machine.
Maybe you did - although I doubt it, based only on your decades-long
history of lies here. I'm VERY skeptical about you designing any
mechanical part of a heart/lung machine.
Why not give us details on those supposed designs of yours? Let us be
astonished at your brilliance!
Not just a liar but a communist that hates the Constitution because it gives peopel the freedom to defend themselves.
On Sat, 25 Jan 2025 20:45:42 GMT, cyclintom <[email protected]>
wrote:
10 million illegal aliens have been getting free medical care <implied - from federal funding>
What are your sources? I'm curious how you can be so wrong.
Trump says there is not enough money to treat 10 million
Americans and don't even get him started on immigrants he imports and "legalizes" to work at his resorts at half the wages.
And yet he receives exactly the same amount of taxes Obama
did (more actually). Where on Earth is he putting the money? In Musk's
saving accounts?
[]'s
//
Can undocumented immigrants get Medicare or Medicaid? Undocumented
immigrants don't have access to health insurance plans that are
Federal government-sponsored.
...........
More than 1 million immigrants, most lacking permanent legal status,
are covered by State health programs. Most of the States are
Republican, since they benefit most from the cheap labor
//
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 715 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 40:48:46 |
| Calls: | 12,109 |
| Files: | 15,006 |
| Messages: | 6,518,403 |