• =?UTF-8?B?UkU6IFJlOiBSRTogUmU6IExvc3QgeW91ciBob21lPyBDYXI/IEV2ZXJ5dGhpb

    From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jan 20 17:57:39 2025
    On Mon Jan 20 11:34:29 2025 Rolf Mantel wrote:
    Am 17.01.2025 um 23:53 schrieb cyclintom:
    On Fri Jan 17 18:35:54 2025 Shadow wrote:
    On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 21:13:30 GMT, cyclintom <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    On Sun Jan 12 10:23:48 2025 Shadow wrote:
    On Sat, 11 Jan 2025 22:07:38 GMT, cyclintom <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    On Thu Jan 9 16:04:05 2025 Shadow wrote:

    LOL

    The fifth horseman of the apocalypse is #FAKE_NEWS.
    Possibly even more powerful than the other 4, but he only >>>>>> targets the weak-of-mind and the unhealthily greedy (Like Musk and the >>>>>> Meta guy), so we're safe.




    Why don't you tell us what you actually know about na man who started >>>>> with nothing and is now one of the most powerfull men on this planet without
    ever losing nhis morals? Does that make you jealous since your morals, >>>>> long ago were cast aside?

    Who on Earth are you talking about?
    Jeeesus? He's only "powerful" to the weak of mind.

    Not Musk** (inherited his family's fortune which was made with
    slave labour in SA, then multiplied it with insider trading and other >>>> crimes), or Zukerberg "they trust me, the stupid fsks". Morals? LOL. >>>> Neither would know what "morals" meant even if it bit them in the ass. >>>> So .... who?
    []'s

    ** PS Zukerberg and Musk have announced that they welcome the fifth
    horseman, as long as they help the anti-christs (ask someone with
    mental issues that believes in the bibel. The prophecies are all
    there....)




    So, you don't even know what "insider trading" is. I should have known. >>
    Nice, saves you looking it up. Insider trading is using
    knowledge you have(due to contacts, bribes etc) that the general
    public does not have access to, to manipulate the stock market. Buy
    cheap and sell high.
    To produce "facts" notably on social media but also in
    newspapers etc that make shares crash/soar and make money with that is
    even more perverse. It's a felony.
    All judges have their price though. As Musk is fond of
    reminding the people he conned.

    My Google is broken

    Too bad you don't know any real connection between Elon Musk and insider trading.

    Having "no need in insider trading" is not a sufficient reason to
    refrain from insider trading.




    When you own a company, by definition you cannot perform "insider trading".

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rolf Mantel@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jan 21 10:15:22 2025
    Am 20.01.2025 um 18:57 schrieb cyclintom:
    On Mon Jan 20 11:34:29 2025 Rolf Mantel wrote:
    Am 17.01.2025 um 23:53 schrieb cyclintom:
    On Fri Jan 17 18:35:54 2025 Shadow wrote:
    On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 21:13:30 GMT, cyclintom <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    On Sun Jan 12 10:23:48 2025 Shadow wrote:
    On Sat, 11 Jan 2025 22:07:38 GMT, cyclintom <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    On Thu Jan 9 16:04:05 2025 Shadow wrote:

    LOL

    The fifth horseman of the apocalypse is #FAKE_NEWS.
    Possibly even more powerful than the other 4, but he only >>>>>>>> targets the weak-of-mind and the unhealthily greedy (Like Musk and the >>>>>>>> Meta guy), so we're safe.




    Why don't you tell us what you actually know about na man who started >>>>>>> with nothing and is now one of the most powerfull men on this planet without
    ever losing nhis morals? Does that make you jealous since your morals, >>>>>>> long ago were cast aside?

    Who on Earth are you talking about?
    Jeeesus? He's only "powerful" to the weak of mind.

    Not Musk** (inherited his family's fortune which was made with
    slave labour in SA, then multiplied it with insider trading and other >>>>>> crimes), or Zukerberg "they trust me, the stupid fsks". Morals? LOL. >>>>>> Neither would know what "morals" meant even if it bit them in the ass. >>>>>> So .... who?
    []'s

    ** PS Zukerberg and Musk have announced that they welcome the fifth >>>>>> horseman, as long as they help the anti-christs (ask someone with
    mental issues that believes in the bibel. The prophecies are all
    there....)




    So, you don't even know what "insider trading" is. I should have known. >>>>
    Nice, saves you looking it up. Insider trading is using
    knowledge you have(due to contacts, bribes etc) that the general
    public does not have access to, to manipulate the stock market. Buy
    cheap and sell high.
    To produce "facts" notably on social media but also in
    newspapers etc that make shares crash/soar and make money with that is >>>> even more perverse. It's a felony.
    All judges have their price though. As Musk is fond of
    reminding the people he conned.

    My Google is broken

    Too bad you don't know any real connection between Elon Musk and insider trading.

    Having "no need in insider trading" is not a sufficient reason to
    refrain from insider trading.

    When you own a company, by definition you cannot perform "insider trading".

    Every "insider trading" involves you to partly own a company at some
    point in time because insider trading is about buying and selling shares.

    When you sell shares in a company, by definition you do not (completely)
    own it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jan 23 00:48:22 2025
    On Tue Jan 21 10:15:22 2025 Rolf Mantel wrote:
    Am 20.01.2025 um 18:57 schrieb cyclintom:
    On Mon Jan 20 11:34:29 2025 Rolf Mantel wrote:
    Am 17.01.2025 um 23:53 schrieb cyclintom:
    On Fri Jan 17 18:35:54 2025 Shadow wrote:
    On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 21:13:30 GMT, cyclintom <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    On Sun Jan 12 10:23:48 2025 Shadow wrote:
    On Sat, 11 Jan 2025 22:07:38 GMT, cyclintom <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote:

    On Thu Jan 9 16:04:05 2025 Shadow wrote:

    LOL

    The fifth horseman of the apocalypse is #FAKE_NEWS.
    Possibly even more powerful than the other 4, but he only >>>>>>>> targets the weak-of-mind and the unhealthily greedy (Like Musk and the
    Meta guy), so we're safe.




    Why don't you tell us what you actually know about na man who started >>>>>>> with nothing and is now one of the most powerfull men on this planet without
    ever losing nhis morals? Does that make you jealous since your morals,
    long ago were cast aside?

    Who on Earth are you talking about?
    Jeeesus? He's only "powerful" to the weak of mind.

    Not Musk** (inherited his family's fortune which was made with >>>>>> slave labour in SA, then multiplied it with insider trading and other >>>>>> crimes), or Zukerberg "they trust me, the stupid fsks". Morals? LOL. >>>>>> Neither would know what "morals" meant even if it bit them in the ass. >>>>>> So .... who?
    []'s

    ** PS Zukerberg and Musk have announced that they welcome the fifth >>>>>> horseman, as long as they help the anti-christs (ask someone with >>>>>> mental issues that believes in the bibel. The prophecies are all >>>>>> there....)




    So, you don't even know what "insider trading" is. I should have known. >>>>
    Nice, saves you looking it up. Insider trading is using
    knowledge you have(due to contacts, bribes etc) that the general
    public does not have access to, to manipulate the stock market. Buy >>>> cheap and sell high.
    To produce "facts" notably on social media but also in
    newspapers etc that make shares crash/soar and make money with that is >>>> even more perverse. It's a felony.
    All judges have their price though. As Musk is fond of
    reminding the people he conned.

    My Google is broken

    Too bad you don't know any real connection between Elon Musk and insider trading.

    Having "no need in insider trading" is not a sufficient reason to
    refrain from insider trading.

    When you own a company, by definition you cannot perform "insider trading".

    Every "insider trading" involves you to partly own a company at some
    point in time because insider trading is about buying and selling shares.

    When you sell shares in a company, by definition you do not (completely)
    own it.




    While you're partially correct, that also is NOT insider trading since the financial conditions of the company are supposed to be public knowledge and insider trading means having knowledge that is not known by the public.

    This is different from having knowledge that is public but which you don't know how to use to advantage.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)