RAS has been and is an excellent source of information for all things soaring. It has a great community with a lot of experience. But I think the interface is old and outdated and there isn't a central repository for documents (manuals, for example).
There's also no ability to share media unless you provide a link.

I've been working on a project to launch a new soaring website that includes a forum. Here's a few of the pros and cons that I think exist (this is certainly not an exhaustive list):

Pros:
- Free
-- First and foremost, this is an opportunity to give back to the soaring community. No registration fees, no requesting of personal information, no "tier" levels for "premium" content. Just register and enjoy.

- Modern interface through a forum with easy navigation
- Ability to post media/pictures
- Ability to post documents

- Club-based sub-forums
-- If your club doesn't have an internal communication platform then you could have one on this site. If you want it locked so only club members can view it, that can be setup too. Once again, this is free. There is no charge to clubs, no requirements,
no strings. Just an option if clubs want a way to communicate with each other.

- No spam
-- RAS has spam posts that appear regularly so this would eliminate that. It's not a huge distraction but it can be annoying when half the page is filled with porn spam messages

Cons:
- Resistance to change
-- I'm aware that many are very comfortable with the current RAS and will resist a new version. I think a modern interface will go a long way with younger pilots who are used to more modern interfaces.

- Learning a new system
-- I'm also aware some many be hesitant to try and learn something new. Perhaps everyone here is already part of other forums (and many probably are!) so this may be irrelevant, but having to register for another site can be a pain.

Soaring is a great sport and I want to see it grow. I'd appreciate your input and feedback on this. I'm open to suggestions if you have any. If you're interested in helping, let me know that too. We'll probably need a few moderators as we grow.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 11/19/2022 2:05 PM, Jon wrote:

RAS has been and is an excellent source of information for all things soaring. It has a great community with a lot of experience. But I think the interface is old and outdated and there isn't a central repository for documents (manuals, for example).

There's also no ability to share media unless you provide a link.

I've been working on a project to launch a new soaring website that includes a forum. Here's a few of the pros and cons that I think exist (this is certainly not an exhaustive list):

Pros:
- Free
-- First and foremost, this is an opportunity to give back to the soaring community. No registration fees, no requesting of personal information, no "tier" levels for "premium" content. Just register and enjoy.

- Modern interface through a forum with easy navigation
- Ability to post media/pictures
- Ability to post documents

- Club-based sub-forums
-- If your club doesn't have an internal communication platform then you could have one on this site. If you want it locked so only club members can view it, that can be setup too. Once again, this is free. There is no charge to clubs, no requirements,

no strings. Just an option if clubs want a way to communicate with each other.

- No spam
-- RAS has spam posts that appear regularly so this would eliminate that. It's not a huge distraction but it can be annoying when half the page is filled with porn spam messages

Cons:
- Resistance to change
-- I'm aware that many are very comfortable with the current RAS and will resist a new version. I think a modern interface will go a long way with younger pilots who are used to more modern interfaces.

- Learning a new system
-- I'm also aware some many be hesitant to try and learn something new. Perhaps everyone here is already part of other forums (and many probably are!) so this may be irrelevant, but having to register for another site can be a pain.

Soaring is a great sport and I want to see it grow. I'd appreciate your input and feedback on this. I'm open to suggestions if you have any. If you're interested in helping, let me know that too. We'll probably need a few moderators as we grow.

Splitting the online world into many slivers is also a "con". Having
one place to go to is an advantage. Up to a point: if the old is too
painful then in with the new. I switched from OLC to Weglide for
posting my flights since last year, the experiment has shown that my
buddies rarely go look there.

One thing I do on RAS is search for old postings on a topic I'm looking
into. The Google web interface to RAS does a decent job of searching,
and has the old postings from at least 20 years archived and searchable.
That's very useful IMO. Any new forum should try and offer good
search capabilities. Of course it is hard to promise 20+ years
longevity to any new venture in today's tech. Especially when "free"
(possibly meaning hosted on some here-today-gone-tomorrow server). Even
Yahoo Groups as a whole - a much larger enterprise - went poof a while
back, when they discovered that it wasn't making them money.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Saturday, November 19, 2022 at 12:05:27 PM UTC-7, Jon wrote:

RAS has been and is an excellent source of information for all things soaring. It has a great community with a lot of experience. But I think the interface is old and outdated and there isn't a central repository for documents (manuals, for example).

There's also no ability to share media unless you provide a link.

I've been working on a project to launch a new soaring website that includes a forum. Here's a few of the pros and cons that I think exist (this is certainly not an exhaustive list):

Pros:
- Free
-- First and foremost, this is an opportunity to give back to the soaring community. No registration fees, no requesting of personal information, no "tier" levels for "premium" content. Just register and enjoy.

- Modern interface through a forum with easy navigation
- Ability to post media/pictures
- Ability to post documents

- Club-based sub-forums
-- If your club doesn't have an internal communication platform then you could have one on this site. If you want it locked so only club members can view it, that can be setup too. Once again, this is free. There is no charge to clubs, no requirements,

no strings. Just an option if clubs want a way to communicate with each other.

- No spam
-- RAS has spam posts that appear regularly so this would eliminate that. It's not a huge distraction but it can be annoying when half the page is filled with porn spam messages

Cons:
- Resistance to change
-- I'm aware that many are very comfortable with the current RAS and will resist a new version. I think a modern interface will go a long way with younger pilots who are used to more modern interfaces.

- Learning a new system
-- I'm also aware some many be hesitant to try and learn something new. Perhaps everyone here is already part of other forums (and many probably are!) so this may be irrelevant, but having to register for another site can be a pain.

Soaring is a great sport and I want to see it grow. I'd appreciate your input and feedback on this. I'm open to suggestions if you have any. If you're interested in helping, let me know that too. We'll probably need a few moderators as we grow.

Been done, gone away. Search for silentflight.com in this group and on archive.org. It was a good effort, but the cost of the server and bandwidth did it in IIRC and the archive is lost AFAICT. When Yahoo groups was being shut down, groups.io allowed
transfers, free at first, $110/group in a short while, then $250/group later on. The cost of cloud hosting is a reality. USENET, using the bascially headless NNTP protocol worked fine, but the cost of the servers and bandwidth also caused many ISPs to
unload that burden. Google created groups and added the USENET into the mix, though there are still USENET servers on the net. Subscription services, such as SuperNews work I guess, but are kind of draconian in their suspension rules. Some who post
here might not last on SuperNews. The USENET is a interesting place yet some trolls can ruin groups. Happened to rec.aviation.homebuilt and it never recovered. Yet, I prefer the broadly available content and resources of the USENET over most forums,
though there are specialty groups on groups.io, private groups on Google groups that are easy to use. Yet, none will replace the USENET. Don't think you can beat it. Just my $0.02. Growing soaring is the goal of many. There are waiting lists for
training in clubs, chapters, and at commercial operations all over the United States, where we need CFI-G's. This should translate into an opportunity for those with a passion to introduce people into the sport at the grass roots level.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Saturday, November 19, 2022 at 2:05:27 PM UTC-5, Jon wrote:

RAS has been and is an excellent source of information for all things soaring. It has a great community with a lot of experience. But I think the interface is old and outdated and there isn't a central repository for documents (manuals, for example).

There's also no ability to share media unless you provide a link.

I've been working on a project to launch a new soaring website that includes a forum. Here's a few of the pros and cons that I think exist (this is certainly not an exhaustive list):

Pros:
- Free
-- First and foremost, this is an opportunity to give back to the soaring community. No registration fees, no requesting of personal information, no "tier" levels for "premium" content. Just register and enjoy.

- Modern interface through a forum with easy navigation
- Ability to post media/pictures
- Ability to post documents

- Club-based sub-forums
-- If your club doesn't have an internal communication platform then you could have one on this site. If you want it locked so only club members can view it, that can be setup too. Once again, this is free. There is no charge to clubs, no requirements,

no strings. Just an option if clubs want a way to communicate with each other.

- No spam
-- RAS has spam posts that appear regularly so this would eliminate that. It's not a huge distraction but it can be annoying when half the page is filled with porn spam messages

Cons:
- Resistance to change
-- I'm aware that many are very comfortable with the current RAS and will resist a new version. I think a modern interface will go a long way with younger pilots who are used to more modern interfaces.

- Learning a new system
-- I'm also aware some many be hesitant to try and learn something new. Perhaps everyone here is already part of other forums (and many probably are!) so this may be irrelevant, but having to register for another site can be a pain.

Soaring is a great sport and I want to see it grow. I'd appreciate your input and feedback on this. I'm open to suggestions if you have any. If you're interested in helping, let me know that too. We'll probably need a few moderators as we grow.

No interest
UH

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

This would be wonderful. Those in my circle generally see RAS as a mixed bag at best, and a toxic cesspool at worst. There are many luminaries here, but there are far too many blowhards who mistake their opinions as universal facts. The signal to noise
ratio here is pretty bad.

As a result of these loud voices, RAS is mostly seen as a half-dozen US pilots shitting on the world. This, despite the fact that the Americans are not the movers and shakers in the soaring world.

People generally aren't excited to engage on an un-moderated platform dominated by a group of pilots who hold racists, misogynists, and neo-nazis in high esteem. Our young pilots don't want to be groomed by these "elders".

So as awesome as this would be, IMHO you've got your work cut out for you. The soaring pilots of the next generation have already found online forums in their native tongues. You have to find a way to grow your target audience beyond either the people
who cause the problem on RAS, or the people who have found a way to persevere here despite them.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

SW4gYSB3b3JkLCBOTy4NCg0KVXNlbmV0IHdvcmtzIGp1c3QgZmluZSBhbmQsIGlmIG9uZSB3 aWxsIHVzZSBhbiBlbWFpbCByZWFkZXIsIGhlIGNhbiANCmJsb2NrIHRyb2xscywgc2VhcmNo IHRvcGljcywgcG9zdCBwaWN0dXJlcywgZXRjLiAgV2hhdCBJIHNhdyBpbiB0aGUgDQppbml0 aWFsIHF1ZXN0aW9uIHdhcyAibW9kZXJhdG9ycyIuICBEb24ndCBuZWVkICdlbSwgZG9uJ3Qg d2FudCAnZW0uDQoNCkJ1dCBkaWRuJ3QgUkFTIFByaW1lIGdldCBzdGFydGVkIG9uIEdvb2ds ZSBHcm91cHM/ICBXaGF0IGRvIHdlIG5lZWQgDQphbm90aGVyIG9uZSBmb3I/DQoNCkRhbg0K NUoNCg0KT24gMTEvMjAvMjIgMTE6MDMsIEZyYW5rIFdoaXRlbGV5IHdyb3RlOg0KPiBPbiBT YXR1cmRheSwgTm92ZW1iZXIgMTksIDIwMjIgYXQgMTI6MDU6MjcgUE0gVVRDLTcsIEpvbiB3 cm90ZToNCj4+IFJBUyBoYXMgYmVlbiBhbmQgaXMgYW4gZXhjZWxsZW50IHNvdXJjZSBvZiBp bmZvcm1hdGlvbiBmb3IgYWxsIHRoaW5ncyBzb2FyaW5nLiBJdCBoYXMgYSBncmVhdCBjb21t dW5pdHkgd2l0aCBhIGxvdCBvZiBleHBlcmllbmNlLiBCdXQgSSB0aGluayB0aGUgaW50ZXJm YWNlIGlzIG9sZCBhbmQgb3V0ZGF0ZWQgYW5kIHRoZXJlIGlzbid0IGEgY2VudHJhbCByZXBv c2l0b3J5IGZvciBkb2N1bWVudHMgKG1hbnVhbHMsIGZvciBleGFtcGxlKS4gVGhlcmUncyBh bHNvIG5vIGFiaWxpdHkgdG8gc2hhcmUgbWVkaWEgdW5sZXNzIHlvdSBwcm92aWRlIGEgbGlu ay4NCj4+DQo+PiBJJ3ZlIGJlZW4gd29ya2luZyBvbiBhIHByb2plY3QgdG8gbGF1bmNoIGEg bmV3IHNvYXJpbmcgd2Vic2l0ZSB0aGF0IGluY2x1ZGVzIGEgZm9ydW0uIEhlcmUncyBhIGZl dyBvZiB0aGUgcHJvcyBhbmQgY29ucyB0aGF0IEkgdGhpbmsgZXhpc3QgKHRoaXMgaXMgY2Vy dGFpbmx5IG5vdCBhbiBleGhhdXN0aXZlIGxpc3QpOg0KPj4NCj4+IFByb3M6DQo+PiAtIEZy ZWUNCj4+IC0tIEZpcnN0IGFuZCBmb3JlbW9zdCwgdGhpcyBpcyBhbiBvcHBvcnR1bml0eSB0 byBnaXZlIGJhY2sgdG8gdGhlIHNvYXJpbmcgY29tbXVuaXR5LiBObyByZWdpc3RyYXRpb24g ZmVlcywgbm8gcmVxdWVzdGluZyBvZiBwZXJzb25hbCBpbmZvcm1hdGlvbiwgbm8gInRpZXIi IGxldmVscyBmb3IgInByZW1pdW0iIGNvbnRlbnQuIEp1c3QgcmVnaXN0ZXIgYW5kIGVuam95 Lg0KPj4NCj4+IC0gTW9kZXJuIGludGVyZmFjZSB0aHJvdWdoIGEgZm9ydW0gd2l0aCBlYXN5 IG5hdmlnYXRpb24NCj4+IC0gQWJpbGl0eSB0byBwb3N0IG1lZGlhL3BpY3R1cmVzDQo+PiAt IEFiaWxpdHkgdG8gcG9zdCBkb2N1bWVudHMNCj4+DQo+PiAtIENsdWItYmFzZWQgc3ViLWZv cnVtcw0KPj4gLS0gSWYgeW91ciBjbHViIGRvZXNuJ3QgaGF2ZSBhbiBpbnRlcm5hbCBjb21t dW5pY2F0aW9uIHBsYXRmb3JtIHRoZW4geW91IGNvdWxkIGhhdmUgb25lIG9uIHRoaXMgc2l0 ZS4gSWYgeW91IHdhbnQgaXQgbG9ja2VkIHNvIG9ubHkgY2x1YiBtZW1iZXJzIGNhbiB2aWV3 IGl0LCB0aGF0IGNhbiBiZSBzZXR1cCB0b28uIE9uY2UgYWdhaW4sIHRoaXMgaXMgZnJlZS4g VGhlcmUgaXMgbm8gY2hhcmdlIHRvIGNsdWJzLCBubyByZXF1aXJlbWVudHMsIG5vIHN0cmlu Z3MuIEp1c3QgYW4gb3B0aW9uIGlmIGNsdWJzIHdhbnQgYSB3YXkgdG8gY29tbXVuaWNhdGUg d2l0aCBlYWNoIG90aGVyLg0KPj4NCj4+IC0gTm8gc3BhbQ0KPj4gLS0gUkFTIGhhcyBzcGFt IHBvc3RzIHRoYXQgYXBwZWFyIHJlZ3VsYXJseSBzbyB0aGlzIHdvdWxkIGVsaW1pbmF0ZSB0 aGF0LiBJdCdzIG5vdCBhIGh1Z2UgZGlzdHJhY3Rpb24gYnV0IGl0IGNhbiBiZSBhbm5veWlu ZyB3aGVuIGhhbGYgdGhlIHBhZ2UgaXMgZmlsbGVkIHdpdGggcG9ybiBzcGFtIG1lc3NhZ2Vz DQo+Pg0KPj4gQ29uczoNCj4+IC0gUmVzaXN0YW5jZSB0byBjaGFuZ2UNCj4+IC0tIEknbSBh d2FyZSB0aGF0IG1hbnkgYXJlIHZlcnkgY29tZm9ydGFibGUgd2l0aCB0aGUgY3VycmVudCBS QVMgYW5kIHdpbGwgcmVzaXN0IGEgbmV3IHZlcnNpb24uIEkgdGhpbmsgYSBtb2Rlcm4gaW50 ZXJmYWNlIHdpbGwgZ28gYSBsb25nIHdheSB3aXRoIHlvdW5nZXIgcGlsb3RzIHdobyBhcmUg dXNlZCB0byBtb3JlIG1vZGVybiBpbnRlcmZhY2VzLg0KPj4NCj4+IC0gTGVhcm5pbmcgYSBu ZXcgc3lzdGVtDQo+PiAtLSBJJ20gYWxzbyBhd2FyZSBzb21lIG1hbnkgYmUgaGVzaXRhbnQg dG8gdHJ5IGFuZCBsZWFybiBzb21ldGhpbmcgbmV3LiBQZXJoYXBzIGV2ZXJ5b25lIGhlcmUg aXMgYWxyZWFkeSBwYXJ0IG9mIG90aGVyIGZvcnVtcyAoYW5kIG1hbnkgcHJvYmFibHkgYXJl ISkgc28gdGhpcyBtYXkgYmUgaXJyZWxldmFudCwgYnV0IGhhdmluZyB0byByZWdpc3RlciBm b3IgYW5vdGhlciBzaXRlIGNhbiBiZSBhIHBhaW4uDQo+Pg0KPj4gU29hcmluZyBpcyBhIGdy ZWF0IHNwb3J0IGFuZCBJIHdhbnQgdG8gc2VlIGl0IGdyb3cuIEknZCBhcHByZWNpYXRlIHlv dXIgaW5wdXQgYW5kIGZlZWRiYWNrIG9uIHRoaXMuIEknbSBvcGVuIHRvIHN1Z2dlc3Rpb25z IGlmIHlvdSBoYXZlIGFueS4gSWYgeW91J3JlIGludGVyZXN0ZWQgaW4gaGVscGluZywgbGV0 IG1lIGtub3cgdGhhdCB0b28uIFdlJ2xsIHByb2JhYmx5IG5lZWQgYSBmZXcgbW9kZXJhdG9y cyBhcyB3ZSBncm93Lg0KPiANCj4gQmVlbiBkb25lLCBnb25lIGF3YXkuICBTZWFyY2ggZm9y IHNpbGVudGZsaWdodC5jb20gaW4gdGhpcyBncm91cCBhbmQgb24gYXJjaGl2ZS5vcmcuICBJ dCB3YXMgYSBnb29kIGVmZm9ydCwgYnV0IHRoZSBjb3N0IG9mIHRoZSBzZXJ2ZXIgYW5kIGJh bmR3aWR0aCBkaWQgaXQgaW4gSUlSQyBhbmQgdGhlIGFyY2hpdmUgaXMgbG9zdCBBRkFJQ1Qu ICBXaGVuIFlhaG9vIGdyb3VwcyB3YXMgYmVpbmcgc2h1dCBkb3duLCBncm91cHMuaW8gYWxs b3dlZCB0cmFuc2ZlcnMsIGZyZWUgYXQgZmlyc3QsICQxMTAvZ3JvdXAgaW4gYSBzaG9ydCB3 aGlsZSwgdGhlbiAkMjUwL2dyb3VwIGxhdGVyIG9uLiAgVGhlIGNvc3Qgb2YgY2xvdWQgaG9z dGluZyBpcyBhIHJlYWxpdHkuICBVU0VORVQsIHVzaW5nIHRoZSBiYXNjaWFsbHkgaGVhZGxl c3MgTk5UUCBwcm90b2NvbCB3b3JrZWQgZmluZSwgYnV0IHRoZSBjb3N0IG9mIHRoZSBzZXJ2 ZXJzIGFuZCBiYW5kd2lkdGggYWxzbyBjYXVzZWQgbWFueSBJU1BzIHRvIHVubG9hZCB0aGF0 IGJ1cmRlbi4gIEdvb2dsZSBjcmVhdGVkIGdyb3VwcyBhbmQgYWRkZWQgdGhlIFVTRU5FVCBp bnRvIHRoZSBtaXgsIHRob3VnaCB0aGVyZSBhcmUgc3RpbGwgVVNFTkVUIHNlcnZlcnMgb24g dGhlIG5ldC4gIFN1YnNjcmlwdGlvbiBzZXJ2aWNlcywgc3VjaCBhcyBTdXBlck5ld3Mgd29y ayBJIGd1ZXNzLCBidXQgYXJlIGtpbmQgb2YgZHJhY29uaWFuIGluIHRoZWlyIHN1c3BlbnNp b24gcnVsZXMuICBTb21lIHdobyBwb3N0IGhlcmUgbWlnaHQgbm90IGxhc3Qgb24gU3VwZXJO ZXdzLiAgVGhlIFVTRU5FVCBpcyBhIGludGVyZXN0aW5nIHBsYWNlIHlldCBzb21lIHRyb2xs cyBjYW4gcnVpbiBncm91cHMuICBIYXBwZW5lZCB0byByZWMuYXZpYXRpb24uaG9tZWJ1aWx0 IGFuZCBpdCBuZXZlciByZWNvdmVyZWQuICBZZXQsIEkgcHJlZmVyIHRoZSBicm9hZGx5IGF2 YWlsYWJsZSBjb250ZW50IGFuZCByZXNvdXJjZXMgb2YgdGhlIFVTRU5FVCBvdmVyIG1vc3Qg Zm9ydW1zLCB0aG91Z2ggdGhlcmUgYXJlIHNwZWNpYWx0eSBncm91cHMgb24gZ3JvdXBzLmlv LCBwcml2YXRlIGdyb3VwcyBvbiBHb29nbGUgZ3JvdXBzIHRoYXQgYXJlIGVhc3kgdG8gdXNl LiAgWWV0LCBub25lIHdpbGwgcmVwbGFjZSB0aGUgVVNFTkVULiAgRG9uJ3QgdGhpbmsgeW91 IGNhbiBiZWF0IGl0LiAgSnVzdCBteSAkMC4wMi4gIEdyb3dpbmcgc29hcmluZyBpcyB0aGUg Z29hbCBvZiBtYW55LiAgVGhlcmUgYXJlIHdhaXRpbmcgbGlzdHMgZm9yIHRyYWluaW5nIGlu IGNsdWJzLCBjaGFwdGVycywgYW5kIGF0IGNvbW1lcmNpYWwgb3BlcmF0aW9ucyBhbGwgb3Zl ciB0aGUgVW5pdGVkIFN0YXRlcywgd2hlcmUgd2UgbmVlZCBDRkktRydzLiAgVGhpcyBzaG91 bGQgdHJhbnNsYXRlIGludG8gYW4gb3Bwb3J0dW5pdHkgZm9yIHRob3NlIHdpdGggYSBwYXNz aW9uIHRvIGludHJvZHVjZSBwZW9wbGUgaW50byB0aGUgc3BvcnQgYXQgdGhlIGdyYXNzIHJv b3RzIGxldmVsLg0K

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Jon,

Thanks for being interested in fostering discussions.

My primary con is related to any one-off web site forum system. And this hinges on capacity, speed, and most of all support.

There are several large and popular forum internet systems - groups.google.com and groups.io to name just two. Each is supported by massive/large organizations with 24x7 support organizations watching after things, housed in huge data center's capacity,
with uber very fast access.

Thanks again, John (OHM)

PS - Its nice to add a signature to your posts.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

I follow maybe dozen active discussion groups (hobbies, interests) and ALL of them are moderated by volunteers. This is only one that is not.

There is not a soul on this earth under 50 years old that knows what usenet group and email reader is. And if they find out, they will run to the opposite direction.

RAS has a long history, but I too think this group has not been very inviting for many years. I have also noted that glider pilots generally do not participate in discussions, regardless of forums. On the other hand, they are most social when meeting irl.
I have no explanation for this.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Monday, November 21, 2022 at 11:37:10 PM UTC-7, krasw wrote:

I follow maybe dozen active discussion groups (hobbies, interests) and ALL of them are moderated by volunteers. This is only one that is not.

There is not a soul on this earth under 50 years old that knows what usenet group and email reader is. And if they find out, they will run to the opposite direction.

RAS has a long history, but I too think this group has not been very inviting for many years. I have also noted that glider pilots generally do not participate in discussions, regardless of forums. On the other hand, they are most social when meeting

irl. I have no explanation for this.
Over the years, there have been a lot of lurkers on RAS. Surprised sometimes at who chimed in from time to time, but those numbers may be dwindling. After watching my grandsons and the amount of screen time they have, I have concerns about reading and
writing, though the parent teacher conferences have been positive, so maybe there's hope.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 8:36:06 AM UTC-8, Frank Whiteley wrote:

On Monday, November 21, 2022 at 11:37:10 PM UTC-7, krasw wrote:

I follow maybe dozen active discussion groups (hobbies, interests) and ALL of them are moderated by volunteers. This is only one that is not.

There is not a soul on this earth under 50 years old that knows what usenet group and email reader is. And if they find out, they will run to the opposite direction.

RAS has a long history, but I too think this group has not been very inviting for many years. I have also noted that glider pilots generally do not participate in discussions, regardless of forums. On the other hand, they are most social when meeting

irl. I have no explanation for this.

Over the years, there have been a lot of lurkers on RAS. Surprised sometimes at who chimed in from time to time, but those numbers may be dwindling. After watching my grandsons and the amount of screen time they have, I have concerns about reading and

writing, though the parent teacher conferences have been positive, so maybe there's hope.

Thank you to everyone who has provided feedback thus far.

Moshe, I think you bring up an excellent point with regards to the ability to search historical posts on RAS. A feature to search RAS could be built in pretty easily to search RAS directly from the website and display the results inside the website with
links back to RAS.

I'm not overly concerned about server or bandwidth issues as most of the reputable ones have very high reliability these days. Unless the site is generating extremely high levels of traffic, I'm also not worried about bandwidth being eaten up and causing
excessive costs. The German website https://www.segelflug.de is an example of how a modern site can function, at least in terms of the forum. Admittedly, I'm not a fan of their homepage.

I look forward to the continued discussion.

Jon

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Not that I'm interested, but who's going to pay for the website?

Dan
5J

On 11/22/22 18:40, Jon wrote:

On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 8:36:06 AM UTC-8, Frank Whiteley wrote:

On Monday, November 21, 2022 at 11:37:10 PM UTC-7, krasw wrote:

I follow maybe dozen active discussion groups (hobbies, interests) and ALL of them are moderated by volunteers. This is only one that is not.

There is not a soul on this earth under 50 years old that knows what usenet group and email reader is. And if they find out, they will run to the opposite direction.

RAS has a long history, but I too think this group has not been very inviting for many years. I have also noted that glider pilots generally do not participate in discussions, regardless of forums. On the other hand, they are most social when meeting

irl. I have no explanation for this.

Over the years, there have been a lot of lurkers on RAS. Surprised sometimes at who chimed in from time to time, but those numbers may be dwindling. After watching my grandsons and the amount of screen time they have, I have concerns about reading and

writing, though the parent teacher conferences have been positive, so maybe there's hope.

Thank you to everyone who has provided feedback thus far.

Moshe, I think you bring up an excellent point with regards to the ability to search historical posts on RAS. A feature to search RAS could be built in pretty easily to search RAS directly from the website and display the results inside the website

with links back to RAS.

I'm not overly concerned about server or bandwidth issues as most of the reputable ones have very high reliability these days. Unless the site is generating extremely high levels of traffic, I'm also not worried about bandwidth being eaten up and

causing excessive costs. The German website https://www.segelflug.de is an example of how a modern site can function, at least in terms of the forum. Admittedly, I'm not a fan of their homepage.

I look forward to the continued discussion.

Jon

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 1:24:33 PM UTC-8, Dan Marotta wrote:

Not that I'm interested, but who's going to pay for the website?

Dan
5J
On 11/22/22 18:40, Jon wrote:

On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 8:36:06 AM UTC-8, Frank Whiteley wrote:

On Monday, November 21, 2022 at 11:37:10 PM UTC-7, krasw wrote:

I follow maybe dozen active discussion groups (hobbies, interests) and ALL of them are moderated by volunteers. This is only one that is not.

There is not a soul on this earth under 50 years old that knows what usenet group and email reader is. And if they find out, they will run to the opposite direction.

RAS has a long history, but I too think this group has not been very inviting for many years. I have also noted that glider pilots generally do not participate in discussions, regardless of forums. On the other hand, they are most social when

meeting irl. I have no explanation for this.

Over the years, there have been a lot of lurkers on RAS. Surprised sometimes at who chimed in from time to time, but those numbers may be dwindling. After watching my grandsons and the amount of screen time they have, I have concerns about reading

and writing, though the parent teacher conferences have been positive, so maybe there's hope.

Thank you to everyone who has provided feedback thus far.

Moshe, I think you bring up an excellent point with regards to the ability to search historical posts on RAS. A feature to search RAS could be built in pretty easily to search RAS directly from the website and display the results inside the website

with links back to RAS.

I'm not overly concerned about server or bandwidth issues as most of the reputable ones have very high reliability these days. Unless the site is generating extremely high levels of traffic, I'm also not worried about bandwidth being eaten up and

causing excessive costs. The German website https://www.segelflug.de is an example of how a modern site can function, at least in terms of the forum. Admittedly, I'm not a fan of their homepage.

I look forward to the continued discussion.

Jon

I am. The first step is to get the forum up and running since that's the primary intent. The rest can be added as we go along.

As we discuss how to generate interest in the sport (regardless of current waiting lists at some places), people search online for their interests and Usenet just doesn't work for 2022. Reddit has a sub-reddit (r/gliding) but Reddit seems to be an
acquired taste as far as I can tell.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Just an idea, a lot of us use mobile device for browsing forums. I would highly recommend integrating forum to Tapatalk (should be pretty trivial), which is pretty common app among active forum users.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 11/24/2022 6:56 AM, krasw wrote:

Just an idea, a lot of us use mobile device for browsing forums. I would highly recommend integrating forum to Tapatalk (should be pretty trivial), which is pretty common app among active forum users.

My experience with Tapatalk (limited to the Tophat forum, and on a PC
not a phone) is that it is PAINFUL. Endless nagging for a paid
subscription, no search facility, etc. Even Google Groups is MUCH better.

And again, for long term stability, I would avoid any such service that
may be gone tomorrow. The Usenet Newsgroup may be old-fashioned, but
its physical existence (including the history of old messages) is
distributed, not dependent on any single service. That, to my mind, is
far more important than the flashiness of any current fad.

Perhaps we should separate in our minds two possibly-incompatible goals:
* serious discussion with long-term archiving
* reaching potential recruits where they are

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 8:37:13 PM UTC-7, Jon wrote:

On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 1:24:33 PM UTC-8, Dan Marotta wrote:

Not that I'm interested, but who's going to pay for the website?

Dan
5J
On 11/22/22 18:40, Jon wrote:

On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 8:36:06 AM UTC-8, Frank Whiteley wrote:

On Monday, November 21, 2022 at 11:37:10 PM UTC-7, krasw wrote:

I follow maybe dozen active discussion groups (hobbies, interests) and ALL of them are moderated by volunteers. This is only one that is not.

There is not a soul on this earth under 50 years old that knows what usenet group and email reader is. And if they find out, they will run to the opposite direction.

RAS has a long history, but I too think this group has not been very inviting for many years. I have also noted that glider pilots generally do not participate in discussions, regardless of forums. On the other hand, they are most social when

meeting irl. I have no explanation for this.

Over the years, there have been a lot of lurkers on RAS. Surprised sometimes at who chimed in from time to time, but those numbers may be dwindling. After watching my grandsons and the amount of screen time they have, I have concerns about reading

and writing, though the parent teacher conferences have been positive, so maybe there's hope.

Thank you to everyone who has provided feedback thus far.

Moshe, I think you bring up an excellent point with regards to the ability to search historical posts on RAS. A feature to search RAS could be built in pretty easily to search RAS directly from the website and display the results inside the website

with links back to RAS.

I'm not overly concerned about server or bandwidth issues as most of the reputable ones have very high reliability these days. Unless the site is generating extremely high levels of traffic, I'm also not worried about bandwidth being eaten up and

causing excessive costs. The German website https://www.segelflug.de is an example of how a modern site can function, at least in terms of the forum. Admittedly, I'm not a fan of their homepage.

I look forward to the continued discussion.

Jon

I am. The first step is to get the forum up and running since that's the primary intent. The rest can be added as we go along.

As we discuss how to generate interest in the sport (regardless of current waiting lists at some places), people search online for their interests and Usenet just doesn't work for 2022. Reddit has a sub-reddit (r/gliding) but Reddit seems to be an

acquired taste as far as I can tell.
WRT local recruiting, one club used Craigslist both to recruit tow pilots and students. Craigslist has an aviation section, so properly constructed offerings can produce results. RAS is not what I would call a recruiting tool and the wearing of flame
proof clothing is still recommended as it not feeding the trolls. The important part is closing the deal, which is the local and most important end of the process.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

FOn Thursday, November 24, 2022 at 9:18:51 AM UTC-8, Frank Whiteley wrote:

On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 8:37:13 PM UTC-7, Jon wrote:

On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 1:24:33 PM UTC-8, Dan Marotta wrote:

Not that I'm interested, but who's going to pay for the website?

Dan
5J
On 11/22/22 18:40, Jon wrote:

On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 8:36:06 AM UTC-8, Frank Whiteley wrote:

On Monday, November 21, 2022 at 11:37:10 PM UTC-7, krasw wrote:

I follow maybe dozen active discussion groups (hobbies, interests) and ALL of them are moderated by volunteers. This is only one that is not.

There is not a soul on this earth under 50 years old that knows what usenet group and email reader is. And if they find out, they will run to the opposite direction.

RAS has a long history, but I too think this group has not been very inviting for many years. I have also noted that glider pilots generally do not participate in discussions, regardless of forums. On the other hand, they are most social when

meeting irl. I have no explanation for this.

Over the years, there have been a lot of lurkers on RAS. Surprised sometimes at who chimed in from time to time, but those numbers may be dwindling. After watching my grandsons and the amount of screen time they have, I have concerns about

reading and writing, though the parent teacher conferences have been positive, so maybe there's hope.

Thank you to everyone who has provided feedback thus far.

Moshe, I think you bring up an excellent point with regards to the ability to search historical posts on RAS. A feature to search RAS could be built in pretty easily to search RAS directly from the website and display the results inside the

website with links back to RAS.

I'm not overly concerned about server or bandwidth issues as most of the reputable ones have very high reliability these days. Unless the site is generating extremely high levels of traffic, I'm also not worried about bandwidth being eaten up and

causing excessive costs. The German website https://www.segelflug.de is an example of how a modern site can function, at least in terms of the forum. Admittedly, I'm not a fan of their homepage.

I look forward to the continued discussion.

Jon

I am. The first step is to get the forum up and running since that's the primary intent. The rest can be added as we go along.

As we discuss how to generate interest in the sport (regardless of current waiting lists at some places), people search online for their interests and Usenet just doesn't work for 2022. Reddit has a sub-reddit (r/gliding) but Reddit seems to be an

acquired taste as far as I can tell.

WRT local recruiting, one club used Craigslist both to recruit tow pilots and students. Craigslist has an aviation section, so properly constructed offerings can produce results. RAS is not what I would call a recruiting tool and the wearing of flame

proof clothing is still recommended as it not feeding the trolls. The important part is closing the deal, which is the local and most important end of the process.
I like the Craigslist idea!

Charlie

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Thursday, November 24, 2022 at 11:57:06 AM UTC-8, [email protected] wrote:

FOn Thursday, November 24, 2022 at 9:18:51 AM UTC-8, Frank Whiteley wrote:

On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 8:37:13 PM UTC-7, Jon wrote:

On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 1:24:33 PM UTC-8, Dan Marotta wrote:

Not that I'm interested, but who's going to pay for the website?

Dan
5J
On 11/22/22 18:40, Jon wrote:

On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 8:36:06 AM UTC-8, Frank Whiteley wrote:

On Monday, November 21, 2022 at 11:37:10 PM UTC-7, krasw wrote:

I follow maybe dozen active discussion groups (hobbies, interests) and ALL of them are moderated by volunteers. This is only one that is not.

There is not a soul on this earth under 50 years old that knows what usenet group and email reader is. And if they find out, they will run to the opposite direction.

RAS has a long history, but I too think this group has not been very inviting for many years. I have also noted that glider pilots generally do not participate in discussions, regardless of forums. On the other hand, they are most social when

meeting irl. I have no explanation for this.

Over the years, there have been a lot of lurkers on RAS. Surprised sometimes at who chimed in from time to time, but those numbers may be dwindling. After watching my grandsons and the amount of screen time they have, I have concerns about

reading and writing, though the parent teacher conferences have been positive, so maybe there's hope.

Thank you to everyone who has provided feedback thus far.

Moshe, I think you bring up an excellent point with regards to the ability to search historical posts on RAS. A feature to search RAS could be built in pretty easily to search RAS directly from the website and display the results inside the

website with links back to RAS.

I'm not overly concerned about server or bandwidth issues as most of the reputable ones have very high reliability these days. Unless the site is generating extremely high levels of traffic, I'm also not worried about bandwidth being eaten up

and causing excessive costs. The German website https://www.segelflug.de is an example of how a modern site can function, at least in terms of the forum. Admittedly, I'm not a fan of their homepage.

I look forward to the continued discussion.

Jon

I am. The first step is to get the forum up and running since that's the primary intent. The rest can be added as we go along.

As we discuss how to generate interest in the sport (regardless of current waiting lists at some places), people search online for their interests and Usenet just doesn't work for 2022. Reddit has a sub-reddit (r/gliding) but Reddit seems to be an

acquired taste as far as I can tell.

WRT local recruiting, one club used Craigslist both to recruit tow pilots and students. Craigslist has an aviation section, so properly constructed offerings can produce results. RAS is not what I would call a recruiting tool and the wearing of flame

proof clothing is still recommended as it not feeding the trolls. The important part is closing the deal, which is the local and most important end of the process.

I like the Craigslist idea!

Charlie

I agree RAS is not a good place for recruiting, and the new site's primary purpose wouldn't serve for recruiting, but it wouldn't hurt it. Especially if the website is actually searchable on the internet. I disagree on Craigslist being a good tool for
recruiting in 2022, but that's just me. There's all kinds of forums for general aviation, including many type specific forums, many of which are quite active.

I understand the hesitation amongst some to not want to move to a new system. If I were to do a poll here (which you can't on RAS but could on the new site), what would the average age of the community be? My odds are on it being 50+ for the majority. I
think that explains part of the hesitation. I understand other concerns as well, though. Moshe's is a valid concern about long term archiving of information. I think we have a way to solve that, but until a new site is established and doesn't disappear
overnight, that concern isn't going anywhere.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 11/26/2022 1:48 PM, Jon wrote:

On Thursday, November 24, 2022 at 11:57:06 AM UTC-8, [email protected] wrote:

I like the Craigslist idea!

Charlie

I agree RAS is not a good place for recruiting, and the new site's primary purpose wouldn't serve for recruiting, but it wouldn't hurt it. Especially if the website is actually searchable on the internet. I disagree on Craigslist being a good tool for

recruiting in 2022, but that's just me. There's all kinds of forums for general aviation, including many type specific forums, many of which are quite active.

I understand the hesitation amongst some to not want to move to a new system. If I were to do a poll here (which you can't on RAS but could on the new site), what would the average age of the community be? My odds are on it being 50+ for the majority.

I think that explains part of the hesitation. I understand other concerns as well, though. Moshe's is a valid concern about long term archiving of information. I think we have a way to solve that, but until a new site is established and doesn't disappear
overnight, that concern isn't going anywhere.

I don't mind moving to a new system (I'm 80), as I already use many Google groups and io
groups. My concern is some people will move to the new group, but many might not, then I
have to follow two groups instead of one, or make a choice between them. RAS is the only
"international general soaring" group I follow, but I'd be willing to try another one. Is
there another one?

--
Eric Greenwell - USA
- "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation"
https://sites.google.com/site/motorgliders/publications

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Thursday, November 24, 2022 at 12:57:06 PM UTC-7, [email protected] wrote:

FOn Thursday, November 24, 2022 at 9:18:51 AM UTC-8, Frank Whiteley wrote:

On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 8:37:13 PM UTC-7, Jon wrote:

On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 1:24:33 PM UTC-8, Dan Marotta wrote:

Not that I'm interested, but who's going to pay for the website?

Dan
5J
On 11/22/22 18:40, Jon wrote:

On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 8:36:06 AM UTC-8, Frank Whiteley wrote:

On Monday, November 21, 2022 at 11:37:10 PM UTC-7, krasw wrote:

I follow maybe dozen active discussion groups (hobbies, interests) and ALL of them are moderated by volunteers. This is only one that is not.

There is not a soul on this earth under 50 years old that knows what usenet group and email reader is. And if they find out, they will run to the opposite direction.

RAS has a long history, but I too think this group has not been very inviting for many years. I have also noted that glider pilots generally do not participate in discussions, regardless of forums. On the other hand, they are most social when

meeting irl. I have no explanation for this.

Over the years, there have been a lot of lurkers on RAS. Surprised sometimes at who chimed in from time to time, but those numbers may be dwindling. After watching my grandsons and the amount of screen time they have, I have concerns about

reading and writing, though the parent teacher conferences have been positive, so maybe there's hope.

Thank you to everyone who has provided feedback thus far.

Moshe, I think you bring up an excellent point with regards to the ability to search historical posts on RAS. A feature to search RAS could be built in pretty easily to search RAS directly from the website and display the results inside the

website with links back to RAS.

I'm not overly concerned about server or bandwidth issues as most of the reputable ones have very high reliability these days. Unless the site is generating extremely high levels of traffic, I'm also not worried about bandwidth being eaten up

and causing excessive costs. The German website https://www.segelflug.de is an example of how a modern site can function, at least in terms of the forum. Admittedly, I'm not a fan of their homepage.

I look forward to the continued discussion.

Jon

I am. The first step is to get the forum up and running since that's the primary intent. The rest can be added as we go along.

As we discuss how to generate interest in the sport (regardless of current waiting lists at some places), people search online for their interests and Usenet just doesn't work for 2022. Reddit has a sub-reddit (r/gliding) but Reddit seems to be an

acquired taste as far as I can tell.

WRT local recruiting, one club used Craigslist both to recruit tow pilots and students. Craigslist has an aviation section, so properly constructed offerings can produce results. RAS is not what I would call a recruiting tool and the wearing of flame

proof clothing is still recommended as it not feeding the trolls. The important part is closing the deal, which is the local and most important end of the process.

I like the Craigslist idea!

Charlie

This PDF was distributed. Contains some screen captures of the promotions. Internal links are no longer valid. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1gNzDcb76DVSCXhV7YFXL2ZP77CAZK7-o/view?usp=share_link

Perhaps a crafted ad for recruiting potential CFI-Gs?

Frank

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Saturday, November 26, 2022 at 6:35:15 PM UTC-8, Frank Whiteley wrote:

On Thursday, November 24, 2022 at 12:57:06 PM UTC-7, [email protected] wrote:

FOn Thursday, November 24, 2022 at 9:18:51 AM UTC-8, Frank Whiteley wrote:

On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 8:37:13 PM UTC-7, Jon wrote:

On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 1:24:33 PM UTC-8, Dan Marotta wrote:

Not that I'm interested, but who's going to pay for the website?

Dan
5J
On 11/22/22 18:40, Jon wrote:

On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 8:36:06 AM UTC-8, Frank Whiteley wrote:

On Monday, November 21, 2022 at 11:37:10 PM UTC-7, krasw wrote: >>> I follow maybe dozen active discussion groups (hobbies, interests) and ALL of them are moderated by volunteers. This is only one that is not.

There is not a soul on this earth under 50 years old that knows what usenet group and email reader is. And if they find out, they will run to the opposite direction.

RAS has a long history, but I too think this group has not been very inviting for many years. I have also noted that glider pilots generally do not participate in discussions, regardless of forums. On the other hand, they are most social

when meeting irl. I have no explanation for this.

Over the years, there have been a lot of lurkers on RAS. Surprised sometimes at who chimed in from time to time, but those numbers may be dwindling. After watching my grandsons and the amount of screen time they have, I have concerns about

reading and writing, though the parent teacher conferences have been positive, so maybe there's hope.

Thank you to everyone who has provided feedback thus far.

Moshe, I think you bring up an excellent point with regards to the ability to search historical posts on RAS. A feature to search RAS could be built in pretty easily to search RAS directly from the website and display the results inside the

website with links back to RAS.

I'm not overly concerned about server or bandwidth issues as most of the reputable ones have very high reliability these days. Unless the site is generating extremely high levels of traffic, I'm also not worried about bandwidth being eaten up

and causing excessive costs. The German website https://www.segelflug.de is an example of how a modern site can function, at least in terms of the forum. Admittedly, I'm not a fan of their homepage.

I look forward to the continued discussion.

Jon

I am. The first step is to get the forum up and running since that's the primary intent. The rest can be added as we go along.

As we discuss how to generate interest in the sport (regardless of current waiting lists at some places), people search online for their interests and Usenet just doesn't work for 2022. Reddit has a sub-reddit (r/gliding) but Reddit seems to be

an acquired taste as far as I can tell.

WRT local recruiting, one club used Craigslist both to recruit tow pilots and students. Craigslist has an aviation section, so properly constructed offerings can produce results. RAS is not what I would call a recruiting tool and the wearing of

flame proof clothing is still recommended as it not feeding the trolls. The important part is closing the deal, which is the local and most important end of the process.

I like the Craigslist idea!

Charlie

This PDF was distributed. Contains some screen captures of the promotions. Internal links are no longer valid. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1gNzDcb76DVSCXhV7YFXL2ZP77CAZK7-o/view?usp=share_link

Perhaps a crafted ad for recruiting potential CFI-Gs?

Frank

Eric,

The current discussion is about potentially starting a new website that's more modern. Part of it is an effort to modernize and part of it is an effort to appeal to younger audiences (not specifically youths, just "younger" in general). I listed some of
the pros and cons in the first message.

Frank,

Thanks for sharing. I took a look at it and what I took from the slides was that somehow Craigslist equated to a tripling of members. I'm not sure if that was the intended take-away but that's what I took away from it. If that's the case, I think it
would be hard to agree with that assessment without more facts, including how big a role moving airports played. But once again, the new website's purpose isn't specifically about recruiting - more about a modern communications platform for glider pilots
(and clubs if they need one).

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Saturday, November 26, 2022 at 8:27:18 PM UTC-7, Jon wrote:

On Saturday, November 26, 2022 at 6:35:15 PM UTC-8, Frank Whiteley wrote:

On Thursday, November 24, 2022 at 12:57:06 PM UTC-7, [email protected] wrote:

FOn Thursday, November 24, 2022 at 9:18:51 AM UTC-8, Frank Whiteley wrote:

On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 8:37:13 PM UTC-7, Jon wrote:

On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 1:24:33 PM UTC-8, Dan Marotta wrote:

Not that I'm interested, but who's going to pay for the website?

Dan
5J
On 11/22/22 18:40, Jon wrote:

On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 8:36:06 AM UTC-8, Frank Whiteley wrote:

On Monday, November 21, 2022 at 11:37:10 PM UTC-7, krasw wrote: >>> I follow maybe dozen active discussion groups (hobbies, interests) and ALL of them are moderated by volunteers. This is only one that is not.

There is not a soul on this earth under 50 years old that knows what usenet group and email reader is. And if they find out, they will run to the opposite direction.

RAS has a long history, but I too think this group has not been very inviting for many years. I have also noted that glider pilots generally do not participate in discussions, regardless of forums. On the other hand, they are most social

when meeting irl. I have no explanation for this.

Over the years, there have been a lot of lurkers on RAS. Surprised sometimes at who chimed in from time to time, but those numbers may be dwindling. After watching my grandsons and the amount of screen time they have, I have concerns about

reading and writing, though the parent teacher conferences have been positive, so maybe there's hope.

Thank you to everyone who has provided feedback thus far.

Moshe, I think you bring up an excellent point with regards to the ability to search historical posts on RAS. A feature to search RAS could be built in pretty easily to search RAS directly from the website and display the results inside the

website with links back to RAS.

I'm not overly concerned about server or bandwidth issues as most of the reputable ones have very high reliability these days. Unless the site is generating extremely high levels of traffic, I'm also not worried about bandwidth being eaten

up and causing excessive costs. The German website https://www.segelflug.de is an example of how a modern site can function, at least in terms of the forum. Admittedly, I'm not a fan of their homepage.

I look forward to the continued discussion.

Jon

I am. The first step is to get the forum up and running since that's the primary intent. The rest can be added as we go along.

As we discuss how to generate interest in the sport (regardless of current waiting lists at some places), people search online for their interests and Usenet just doesn't work for 2022. Reddit has a sub-reddit (r/gliding) but Reddit seems to be

an acquired taste as far as I can tell.

WRT local recruiting, one club used Craigslist both to recruit tow pilots and students. Craigslist has an aviation section, so properly constructed offerings can produce results. RAS is not what I would call a recruiting tool and the wearing of

flame proof clothing is still recommended as it not feeding the trolls. The important part is closing the deal, which is the local and most important end of the process.

I like the Craigslist idea!

Charlie

This PDF was distributed. Contains some screen captures of the promotions. Internal links are no longer valid. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1gNzDcb76DVSCXhV7YFXL2ZP77CAZK7-o/view?usp=share_link

Perhaps a crafted ad for recruiting potential CFI-Gs?

Frank

Eric,

The current discussion is about potentially starting a new website that's more modern. Part of it is an effort to modernize and part of it is an effort to appeal to younger audiences (not specifically youths, just "younger" in general). I listed some

of the pros and cons in the first message.

Frank,

Thanks for sharing. I took a look at it and what I took from the slides was that somehow Craigslist equated to a tripling of members. I'm not sure if that was the intended take-away but that's what I took away from it. If that's the case, I think it

would be hard to agree with that assessment without more facts, including how big a role moving airports played. But once again, the new website's purpose isn't specifically about recruiting - more about a modern communications platform for glider pilots
(and clubs if they need one).
There's nothing wrong with a new, useful website. Content generation is key and the biggest challenge. Aggregating and sharing content can be useful as there are many channels out there and that's what RAS remains, a channel, useful, annoying, and
sometimes challenging.

Have fun,

Frank

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Saturday, November 26, 2022 at 10:00:14 PM UTC-8, Frank Whiteley wrote:

On Saturday, November 26, 2022 at 8:27:18 PM UTC-7, Jon wrote:

On Saturday, November 26, 2022 at 6:35:15 PM UTC-8, Frank Whiteley wrote:

On Thursday, November 24, 2022 at 12:57:06 PM UTC-7, [email protected] wrote:

FOn Thursday, November 24, 2022 at 9:18:51 AM UTC-8, Frank Whiteley wrote:

On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 8:37:13 PM UTC-7, Jon wrote:

On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 1:24:33 PM UTC-8, Dan Marotta wrote:

Not that I'm interested, but who's going to pay for the website?

Dan
5J
On 11/22/22 18:40, Jon wrote:

On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 8:36:06 AM UTC-8, Frank Whiteley wrote:

On Monday, November 21, 2022 at 11:37:10 PM UTC-7, krasw wrote:

I follow maybe dozen active discussion groups (hobbies, interests) and ALL of them are moderated by volunteers. This is only one that is not.

There is not a soul on this earth under 50 years old that knows what usenet group and email reader is. And if they find out, they will run to the opposite direction.

RAS has a long history, but I too think this group has not been very inviting for many years. I have also noted that glider pilots generally do not participate in discussions, regardless of forums. On the other hand, they are most

social when meeting irl. I have no explanation for this.

Over the years, there have been a lot of lurkers on RAS. Surprised sometimes at who chimed in from time to time, but those numbers may be dwindling. After watching my grandsons and the amount of screen time they have, I have concerns

about reading and writing, though the parent teacher conferences have been positive, so maybe there's hope.

Thank you to everyone who has provided feedback thus far.

Moshe, I think you bring up an excellent point with regards to the ability to search historical posts on RAS. A feature to search RAS could be built in pretty easily to search RAS directly from the website and display the results inside

the website with links back to RAS.

I'm not overly concerned about server or bandwidth issues as most of the reputable ones have very high reliability these days. Unless the site is generating extremely high levels of traffic, I'm also not worried about bandwidth being

eaten up and causing excessive costs. The German website https://www.segelflug.de is an example of how a modern site can function, at least in terms of the forum. Admittedly, I'm not a fan of their homepage.

I look forward to the continued discussion.

Jon

I am. The first step is to get the forum up and running since that's the primary intent. The rest can be added as we go along.

As we discuss how to generate interest in the sport (regardless of current waiting lists at some places), people search online for their interests and Usenet just doesn't work for 2022. Reddit has a sub-reddit (r/gliding) but Reddit seems to

be an acquired taste as far as I can tell.

WRT local recruiting, one club used Craigslist both to recruit tow pilots and students. Craigslist has an aviation section, so properly constructed offerings can produce results. RAS is not what I would call a recruiting tool and the wearing of

flame proof clothing is still recommended as it not feeding the trolls. The important part is closing the deal, which is the local and most important end of the process.

I like the Craigslist idea!

Charlie

This PDF was distributed. Contains some screen captures of the promotions. Internal links are no longer valid. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1gNzDcb76DVSCXhV7YFXL2ZP77CAZK7-o/view?usp=share_link

Perhaps a crafted ad for recruiting potential CFI-Gs?

Frank

Eric,

The current discussion is about potentially starting a new website that's more modern. Part of it is an effort to modernize and part of it is an effort to appeal to younger audiences (not specifically youths, just "younger" in general). I listed some

of the pros and cons in the first message.

Frank,

Thanks for sharing. I took a look at it and what I took from the slides was that somehow Craigslist equated to a tripling of members. I'm not sure if that was the intended take-away but that's what I took away from it. If that's the case, I think it

would be hard to agree with that assessment without more facts, including how big a role moving airports played. But once again, the new website's purpose isn't specifically about recruiting - more about a modern communications platform for glider pilots
(and clubs if they need one).

There's nothing wrong with a new, useful website. Content generation is key and the biggest challenge. Aggregating and sharing content can be useful as there are many channels out there and that's what RAS remains, a channel, useful, annoying, and

sometimes challenging.

Have fun,

Frank

I agree, Frank.

As I work on this, I thought it would be interesting to put together a comparison tool. If you're searching for a glider to purchase and are curious how a LS-3 compares to an ASW-20 then you could compare at least some of the pertinent information (glide
ratio, weight, flaps, etc.). Real world experiences will vary, of course.

That, and a document section for downloading useful information such as manuals, placards, brochures, etc.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Sunday, December 18, 2022 at 2:42:12 PM UTC-7, Jon wrote:

On Saturday, November 26, 2022 at 10:00:14 PM UTC-8, Frank Whiteley wrote:

On Saturday, November 26, 2022 at 8:27:18 PM UTC-7, Jon wrote:

On Saturday, November 26, 2022 at 6:35:15 PM UTC-8, Frank Whiteley wrote:

On Thursday, November 24, 2022 at 12:57:06 PM UTC-7, [email protected] wrote:

FOn Thursday, November 24, 2022 at 9:18:51 AM UTC-8, Frank Whiteley wrote:

On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 8:37:13 PM UTC-7, Jon wrote:

On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 1:24:33 PM UTC-8, Dan Marotta wrote:

Not that I'm interested, but who's going to pay for the website?

Dan
5J
On 11/22/22 18:40, Jon wrote:

On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 8:36:06 AM UTC-8, Frank Whiteley wrote:

On Monday, November 21, 2022 at 11:37:10 PM UTC-7, krasw wrote:

I follow maybe dozen active discussion groups (hobbies, interests) and ALL of them are moderated by volunteers. This is only one that is not.

There is not a soul on this earth under 50 years old that knows what usenet group and email reader is. And if they find out, they will run to the opposite direction.

RAS has a long history, but I too think this group has not been very inviting for many years. I have also noted that glider pilots generally do not participate in discussions, regardless of forums. On the other hand, they are most

social when meeting irl. I have no explanation for this.

Over the years, there have been a lot of lurkers on RAS. Surprised sometimes at who chimed in from time to time, but those numbers may be dwindling. After watching my grandsons and the amount of screen time they have, I have concerns

about reading and writing, though the parent teacher conferences have been positive, so maybe there's hope.

Thank you to everyone who has provided feedback thus far.

Moshe, I think you bring up an excellent point with regards to the ability to search historical posts on RAS. A feature to search RAS could be built in pretty easily to search RAS directly from the website and display the results inside

the website with links back to RAS.

I'm not overly concerned about server or bandwidth issues as most of the reputable ones have very high reliability these days. Unless the site is generating extremely high levels of traffic, I'm also not worried about bandwidth being

eaten up and causing excessive costs. The German website https://www.segelflug.de is an example of how a modern site can function, at least in terms of the forum. Admittedly, I'm not a fan of their homepage.

I look forward to the continued discussion.

Jon

I am. The first step is to get the forum up and running since that's the primary intent. The rest can be added as we go along.

As we discuss how to generate interest in the sport (regardless of current waiting lists at some places), people search online for their interests and Usenet just doesn't work for 2022. Reddit has a sub-reddit (r/gliding) but Reddit seems

to be an acquired taste as far as I can tell.

WRT local recruiting, one club used Craigslist both to recruit tow pilots and students. Craigslist has an aviation section, so properly constructed offerings can produce results. RAS is not what I would call a recruiting tool and the wearing

of flame proof clothing is still recommended as it not feeding the trolls. The important part is closing the deal, which is the local and most important end of the process.

I like the Craigslist idea!

Charlie

This PDF was distributed. Contains some screen captures of the promotions. Internal links are no longer valid. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1gNzDcb76DVSCXhV7YFXL2ZP77CAZK7-o/view?usp=share_link

Perhaps a crafted ad for recruiting potential CFI-Gs?

Frank

Eric,

The current discussion is about potentially starting a new website that's more modern. Part of it is an effort to modernize and part of it is an effort to appeal to younger audiences (not specifically youths, just "younger" in general). I listed

some of the pros and cons in the first message.

Frank,

Thanks for sharing. I took a look at it and what I took from the slides was that somehow Craigslist equated to a tripling of members. I'm not sure if that was the intended take-away but that's what I took away from it. If that's the case, I think

it would be hard to agree with that assessment without more facts, including how big a role moving airports played. But once again, the new website's purpose isn't specifically about recruiting - more about a modern communications platform for glider
pilots (and clubs if they need one).

There's nothing wrong with a new, useful website. Content generation is key and the biggest challenge. Aggregating and sharing content can be useful as there are many channels out there and that's what RAS remains, a channel, useful, annoying, and

sometimes challenging.

Have fun,

Frank

I agree, Frank.

As I work on this, I thought it would be interesting to put together a comparison tool. If you're searching for a glider to purchase and are curious how a LS-3 compares to an ASW-20 then you could compare at least some of the pertinent information (

glide ratio, weight, flaps, etc.). Real world experiences will vary, of course.

That, and a document section for downloading useful information such as manuals, placards, brochures, etc.

Fair enough.

Are you aware of this site? https://sailplanedirectory.com/ It's clearly not current, but nor attracting much interest. The SSA Sailplane Directory is currently under redevelopment. It won't be public. In addition to content will also link sailplane
data to contests, records, and web content and will hopefully be kept current and resourceful.

Frank Whiteley

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Sunday, December 18, 2022 at 4:42:12 PM UTC-5, Jon wrote:

On Saturday, November 26, 2022 at 10:00:14 PM UTC-8, Frank Whiteley wrote:

On Saturday, November 26, 2022 at 8:27:18 PM UTC-7, Jon wrote:

On Saturday, November 26, 2022 at 6:35:15 PM UTC-8, Frank Whiteley wrote:

On Thursday, November 24, 2022 at 12:57:06 PM UTC-7, [email protected] wrote:

FOn Thursday, November 24, 2022 at 9:18:51 AM UTC-8, Frank Whiteley wrote:

On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 8:37:13 PM UTC-7, Jon wrote:

On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 1:24:33 PM UTC-8, Dan Marotta wrote:

Not that I'm interested, but who's going to pay for the website?

Dan
5J
On 11/22/22 18:40, Jon wrote:

On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 8:36:06 AM UTC-8, Frank Whiteley wrote:

On Monday, November 21, 2022 at 11:37:10 PM UTC-7, krasw wrote:

I follow maybe dozen active discussion groups (hobbies, interests) and ALL of them are moderated by volunteers. This is only one that is not.

There is not a soul on this earth under 50 years old that knows what usenet group and email reader is. And if they find out, they will run to the opposite direction.

RAS has a long history, but I too think this group has not been very inviting for many years. I have also noted that glider pilots generally do not participate in discussions, regardless of forums. On the other hand, they are most

social when meeting irl. I have no explanation for this.

Over the years, there have been a lot of lurkers on RAS. Surprised sometimes at who chimed in from time to time, but those numbers may be dwindling. After watching my grandsons and the amount of screen time they have, I have concerns

about reading and writing, though the parent teacher conferences have been positive, so maybe there's hope.

Thank you to everyone who has provided feedback thus far.

Moshe, I think you bring up an excellent point with regards to the ability to search historical posts on RAS. A feature to search RAS could be built in pretty easily to search RAS directly from the website and display the results inside

the website with links back to RAS.

I'm not overly concerned about server or bandwidth issues as most of the reputable ones have very high reliability these days. Unless the site is generating extremely high levels of traffic, I'm also not worried about bandwidth being

eaten up and causing excessive costs. The German website https://www.segelflug.de is an example of how a modern site can function, at least in terms of the forum. Admittedly, I'm not a fan of their homepage.

I look forward to the continued discussion.

Jon

I am. The first step is to get the forum up and running since that's the primary intent. The rest can be added as we go along.

As we discuss how to generate interest in the sport (regardless of current waiting lists at some places), people search online for their interests and Usenet just doesn't work for 2022. Reddit has a sub-reddit (r/gliding) but Reddit seems

to be an acquired taste as far as I can tell.

WRT local recruiting, one club used Craigslist both to recruit tow pilots and students. Craigslist has an aviation section, so properly constructed offerings can produce results. RAS is not what I would call a recruiting tool and the wearing

of flame proof clothing is still recommended as it not feeding the trolls. The important part is closing the deal, which is the local and most important end of the process.

I like the Craigslist idea!

Charlie

This PDF was distributed. Contains some screen captures of the promotions. Internal links are no longer valid. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1gNzDcb76DVSCXhV7YFXL2ZP77CAZK7-o/view?usp=share_link

Perhaps a crafted ad for recruiting potential CFI-Gs?

Frank

Eric,

The current discussion is about potentially starting a new website that's more modern. Part of it is an effort to modernize and part of it is an effort to appeal to younger audiences (not specifically youths, just "younger" in general). I listed

some of the pros and cons in the first message.

Frank,

Thanks for sharing. I took a look at it and what I took from the slides was that somehow Craigslist equated to a tripling of members. I'm not sure if that was the intended take-away but that's what I took away from it. If that's the case, I think

it would be hard to agree with that assessment without more facts, including how big a role moving airports played. But once again, the new website's purpose isn't specifically about recruiting - more about a modern communications platform for glider
pilots (and clubs if they need one).

There's nothing wrong with a new, useful website. Content generation is key and the biggest challenge. Aggregating and sharing content can be useful as there are many channels out there and that's what RAS remains, a channel, useful, annoying, and

sometimes challenging.

Have fun,

Frank

I agree, Frank.

As I work on this, I thought it would be interesting to put together a comparison tool. If you're searching for a glider to purchase and are curious how a LS-3 compares to an ASW-20 then you could compare at least some of the pertinent information (

glide ratio, weight, flaps, etc.). Real world experiences will vary, of course.

That, and a document section for downloading useful information such as manuals, placards, brochures, etc.

The information you would like to compare ships is available in the Soaring magazine archive. Look it up under the Johnson reports. Dick did a great job of not only measuring performance, but evaluating other attributes. Not a one click solution but that
is completely unrealistic. Who could possibly anticipate every search someone would want and program it.
UH

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

The only problem with Dick Johnson's reports is that they do not include any gliders built after 1998. (The date of the last report, AFAIK)

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 6:48:56 AM UTC-8, Mark Mocho wrote:

The only problem with Dick Johnson's reports is that they do not include any gliders built after 1998. (The date of the last report, AFAIK)

Frank,
I haven't seen that one, but I have seen https://www.gliderreview.com which is pretty similar from the looks of it.

Hank,
If you go look at Home Depot's website, for example, you can click "compare" on a lot of the products of the same category (take power tools, for example) and it brings up the two tools so you can compare them. That's the style of comparison I'm talking
about, and not that hard to put together.

As far as the Soaring magazine archive, that's good to know. However, the idea is to have a resource that's modern, user friendly, easy to navigate, and kind of a "one stop shop" for a lot of soaring related things. Certainly it's not going to be the
only resource, but it would be nice to have something cleaner.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 1:42:11 PM UTC-5, Jon wrote:

On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 6:48:56 AM UTC-8, Mark Mocho wrote:

The only problem with Dick Johnson's reports is that they do not include any gliders built after 1998. (The date of the last report, AFAIK)

Frank,
I haven't seen that one, but I have seen https://www.gliderreview.com which is pretty similar from the looks of it.

Hank,
If you go look at Home Depot's website, for example, you can click "compare" on a lot of the products of the same category (take power tools, for example) and it brings up the two tools so you can compare them. That's the style of comparison I'm

talking about, and not that hard to put together.

As far as the Soaring magazine archive, that's good to know. However, the idea is to have a resource that's modern, user friendly, easy to navigate, and kind of a "one stop shop" for a lot of soaring related things. Certainly it's not going to be the

only resource, but it would be nice to have something cleaner.
How about getting current info consistent between "SSA.ORG" and "members.SSA.ORG".... That is a current sore point, and more pressing.
I have had recent phone conversations with peeps that have some clue on this. The rest of the ideas are great sounding, I would support the effort. But let's get the current stuff fixed first. From past jobs, I know about "consultation bleed" or "change orders".
Gotta start with a solid clear target, minor tweaks as needed.
The, "we kinda sorta want...." leads down a large rabbit hole.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 10:57:04 AM UTC-8, Charlie M. (UH & 002 owner/pilot) wrote:

On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 1:42:11 PM UTC-5, Jon wrote:

On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 6:48:56 AM UTC-8, Mark Mocho wrote:

The only problem with Dick Johnson's reports is that they do not include any gliders built after 1998. (The date of the last report, AFAIK)

Frank,
I haven't seen that one, but I have seen https://www.gliderreview.com which is pretty similar from the looks of it.

Hank,
If you go look at Home Depot's website, for example, you can click "compare" on a lot of the products of the same category (take power tools, for example) and it brings up the two tools so you can compare them. That's the style of comparison I'm

talking about, and not that hard to put together.

As far as the Soaring magazine archive, that's good to know. However, the idea is to have a resource that's modern, user friendly, easy to navigate, and kind of a "one stop shop" for a lot of soaring related things. Certainly it's not going to be the

only resource, but it would be nice to have something cleaner.

How about getting current info consistent between "SSA.ORG" and "members.SSA.ORG".... That is a current sore point, and more pressing.
I have had recent phone conversations with peeps that have some clue on this.
The rest of the ideas are great sounding, I would support the effort. But let's get the current stuff fixed first. From past jobs, I know about "consultation bleed" or "change orders".
Gotta start with a solid clear target, minor tweaks as needed.
The, "we kinda sorta want...." leads down a large rabbit hole.

Are you referring to the two separate logins for SSA and members.ssa.org website? If so, I can't fix that - but it certainly is annoying. I don't know why it's setup like that and not all integrated into one website.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 4:36:39 PM UTC-5, Jon wrote:

On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 10:57:04 AM UTC-8, Charlie M. (UH & 002 owner/pilot) wrote:

On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 1:42:11 PM UTC-5, Jon wrote:

On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 6:48:56 AM UTC-8, Mark Mocho wrote:

The only problem with Dick Johnson's reports is that they do not include any gliders built after 1998. (The date of the last report, AFAIK)

Frank,
I haven't seen that one, but I have seen https://www.gliderreview.com which is pretty similar from the looks of it.

Hank,
If you go look at Home Depot's website, for example, you can click "compare" on a lot of the products of the same category (take power tools, for example) and it brings up the two tools so you can compare them. That's the style of comparison I'm

talking about, and not that hard to put together.

As far as the Soaring magazine archive, that's good to know. However, the idea is to have a resource that's modern, user friendly, easy to navigate, and kind of a "one stop shop" for a lot of soaring related things. Certainly it's not going to be

the only resource, but it would be nice to have something cleaner.

How about getting current info consistent between "SSA.ORG" and "members.SSA.ORG".... That is a current sore point, and more pressing.
I have had recent phone conversations with peeps that have some clue on this.
The rest of the ideas are great sounding, I would support the effort. But let's get the current stuff fixed first. From past jobs, I know about "consultation bleed" or "change orders".
Gotta start with a solid clear target, minor tweaks as needed.
The, "we kinda sorta want...." leads down a large rabbit hole.

Are you referring to the two separate logins for SSA and members.ssa.org website? If so, I can't fix that - but it certainly is annoying. I don't know why it's setup like that and not all integrated into one website.

It is like that because the web site developer was given the task of making a new flashy web site that would attract new members, and especially the member revenue that comes. I hear by the grapevine that results appear to be favorable. What was not
adequately considered is that the web site is the repository of a great deal of information that members wish to access. It is not easy to find on the legacy site but with determination it can be found. Making all that information available through the
new site is a huge job. I was told by the developer at one time that she didn't think it was important to do so.
Sigh
UH

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 12/20/22 3:21 PM, Hank Nixon wrote:

On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 4:36:39 PM UTC-5, Jon wrote:

On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 10:57:04 AM UTC-8, Charlie M. (UH & 002 owner/pilot) wrote:

On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 1:42:11 PM UTC-5, Jon wrote:

On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 6:48:56 AM UTC-8, Mark Mocho wrote:

The only problem with Dick Johnson's reports is that they do not include any gliders built after 1998. (The date of the last report, AFAIK)

Frank,
I haven't seen that one, but I have seen https://www.gliderreview.com which is pretty similar from the looks of it.

Hank,
If you go look at Home Depot's website, for example, you can click "compare" on a lot of the products of the same category (take power tools, for example) and it brings up the two tools so you can compare them. That's the style of comparison I'm

talking about, and not that hard to put together.

As far as the Soaring magazine archive, that's good to know. However, the idea is to have a resource that's modern, user friendly, easy to navigate, and kind of a "one stop shop" for a lot of soaring related things. Certainly it's not going to be

the only resource, but it would be nice to have something cleaner.

How about getting current info consistent between "SSA.ORG" and "members.SSA.ORG".... That is a current sore point, and more pressing.
I have had recent phone conversations with peeps that have some clue on this.
The rest of the ideas are great sounding, I would support the effort. But let's get the current stuff fixed first. From past jobs, I know about "consultation bleed" or "change orders".
Gotta start with a solid clear target, minor tweaks as needed.
The, "we kinda sorta want...." leads down a large rabbit hole.

Are you referring to the two separate logins for SSA and members.ssa.org website? If so, I can't fix that - but it certainly is annoying. I don't know why it's setup like that and not all integrated into one website.

It is like that because the web site developer was given the task of making a new flashy web site that would attract new members, and especially the member revenue that comes. I hear by the grapevine that results appear to be favorable. What was not

adequately considered is that the web site is the repository of a great deal of information that members wish to access. It is not easy to find on the legacy site but with determination it can be found. Making all that information available through the
new site is a huge job. I was told by the developer at one time that she didn't think it was important to do so.

Sigh
UH

members.ssa.org appears to be what's left over from the old website,
with a new graphical front end. That's why you use the old credentials
to log into it.

What's ridiculous is the SSA office keeps trying to route people through ssa.org before giving users the option to get to members.ssa.org. I
have a friend who just wanted contact info for a member, he called Hobbs
and they tried to guide him through ssa.org, and he got so frustrated he
gave up. I showed him the shortcut of just going to members.ssa.org,
and he was happy.

I assumed the present organization was just an ugly hack, meant to get something out the door sooner, and would eventually be fixed.
Apparently not. If this website was for a well-run business, the IT
staff would have been fired a long time ago.

-Dave

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 11:42:11 AM UTC-7, Jon wrote:

On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 6:48:56 AM UTC-8, Mark Mocho wrote:

The only problem with Dick Johnson's reports is that they do not include any gliders built after 1998. (The date of the last report, AFAIK)

Frank,
I haven't seen that one, but I have seen https://www.gliderreview.com which is pretty similar from the looks of it.

Hank,
If you go look at Home Depot's website, for example, you can click "compare" on a lot of the products of the same category (take power tools, for example) and it brings up the two tools so you can compare them. That's the style of comparison I'm

talking about, and not that hard to put together.

As far as the Soaring magazine archive, that's good to know. However, the idea is to have a resource that's modern, user friendly, easy to navigate, and kind of a "one stop shop" for a lot of soaring related things. Certainly it's not going to be the

only resource, but it would be nice to have something cleaner.

AFAIK, the manufacturers have not published polars for many years nor has there been independent testing that I'm aware of. I don't know if you have access to Technical Soaring. https://ostiv.org/ There will be an OSTIV speaker track at the SSA
Convention.

Frank

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)