• vario behavior mystery

    From Moshe Braner@21:1/5 to All on Tue Aug 16 22:18:22 2022
    So we have this plain mechanical vario in a glider, connected to a TE
    probe and a flask. The TE probe is also connected to an electronic
    vario with a pressure sensor, which is not ideal for the electronic
    vario, but shouldn't affect the mechanical one much. While thermaling,
    the mechanical vario shows lift, varying similarly to what the
    electronic one shows. But while cruising, the mechanical vario is
    continuously PEGGED DOWN. Well sometimes for a little while it is not
    quite pegged, but still way down, around -8 knots. At the same time the electronic one (if the Speed Control function is turned off) is showing reasonable and varying sink rates. What could cause that behavior?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Martin Gregorie@21:1/5 to Moshe Braner on Wed Aug 17 10:11:22 2022
    On Tue, 16 Aug 2022 22:18:22 -0400, Moshe Braner wrote:

    So we have this plain mechanical vario in a glider, connected to a TE
    probe and a flask. The TE probe is also connected to an electronic
    vario with a pressure sensor, which is not ideal for the electronic
    vario, but shouldn't affect the mechanical one much. While thermaling,
    the mechanical vario shows lift, varying similarly to what the
    electronic one shows. But while cruising, the mechanical vario is continuously PEGGED DOWN. Well sometimes for a little while it is not
    quite pegged, but still way down, around -8 knots. At the same time the electronic one (if the Speed Control function is turned off) is showing reasonable and varying sink rates. What could cause that behavior?

    Where is the T split in the line from the TE probe.

    In http://www.borgeltinstruments.com/?page_id=248 there's a note that
    says:

    "Note that other instruments with flasks can affect the response of the
    BORGELT variometers which can be avoided by splitting the TE line well aft
    from the instrument panel. Under the rear of the seat pan will work well.
    This does not apply for instruments without flasks like the B21/B40/B50/ B100/B400/B500/B600/B700/B800/B900 and other variometers which work on the silicon pressure sensor principle."

    I know that this is the opposite problem to what you're seeing but it may
    still be relevant. Could there be a leak on the flask side of the
    mechanical vario? (unsupported guess by me).


    --

    Martin | martin at
    Gregorie | gregorie dot org

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Hank Nixon@21:1/5 to Moshe Braner on Wed Aug 17 05:31:39 2022
    On Tuesday, August 16, 2022 at 10:18:26 PM UTC-4, Moshe Braner wrote:
    So we have this plain mechanical vario in a glider, connected to a TE
    probe and a flask. The TE probe is also connected to an electronic
    vario with a pressure sensor, which is not ideal for the electronic
    vario, but shouldn't affect the mechanical one much. While thermaling,
    the mechanical vario shows lift, varying similarly to what the
    electronic one shows. But while cruising, the mechanical vario is continuously PEGGED DOWN. Well sometimes for a little while it is not
    quite pegged, but still way down, around -8 knots. At the same time the electronic one (if the Speed Control function is turned off) is showing reasonable and varying sink rates. What could cause that behavior?

    Don't outthink this one.
    1)Never connect varios in series.
    2) If using a common TE source connect as far away from variometers as possible.
    3) Leak check circuits independently.
    4) Verify correct connections.
    UH

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From john firth@21:1/5 to Hank Nixon on Wed Aug 17 06:15:28 2022
    On Wednesday, August 17, 2022 at 8:31:41 AM UTC-4, Hank Nixon wrote:
    On Tuesday, August 16, 2022 at 10:18:26 PM UTC-4, Moshe Braner wrote:
    So we have this plain mechanical vario in a glider, connected to a TE
    probe and a flask. The TE probe is also connected to an electronic
    vario with a pressure sensor, which is not ideal for the electronic
    vario, but shouldn't affect the mechanical one much. While thermaling,
    the mechanical vario shows lift, varying similarly to what the
    electronic one shows. But while cruising, the mechanical vario is continuously PEGGED DOWN. Well sometimes for a little while it is not
    quite pegged, but still way down, around -8 knots. At the same time the electronic one (if the Speed Control function is turned off) is showing reasonable and varying sink rates. What could cause that behavior?
    Don't outthink this one.
    1)Never connect varios in series.
    2) If using a common TE source connect as far away from variometers as possible.
    3) Leak check circuits independently.
    4) Verify correct connections.
    UH
    Check for vario case leaks; glass seal.
    JMF

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Moshe Braner@21:1/5 to Martin Gregorie on Wed Aug 17 08:17:06 2022
    On 8/17/2022 6:11 AM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
    On Tue, 16 Aug 2022 22:18:22 -0400, Moshe Braner wrote:

    So we have this plain mechanical vario in a glider, connected to a TE
    probe and a flask. The TE probe is also connected to an electronic
    vario with a pressure sensor, which is not ideal for the electronic
    vario, but shouldn't affect the mechanical one much. While thermaling,
    the mechanical vario shows lift, varying similarly to what the
    electronic one shows. But while cruising, the mechanical vario is
    continuously PEGGED DOWN. Well sometimes for a little while it is not
    quite pegged, but still way down, around -8 knots. At the same time the
    electronic one (if the Speed Control function is turned off) is showing
    reasonable and varying sink rates. What could cause that behavior?

    Where is the T split in the line from the TE probe.

    In http://www.borgeltinstruments.com/?page_id=248 there's a note that
    says:

    "Note that other instruments with flasks can affect the response of the BORGELT variometers which can be avoided by splitting the TE line well aft from the instrument panel. Under the rear of the seat pan will work well. This does not apply for instruments without flasks like the B21/B40/B50/ B100/B400/B500/B600/B700/B800/B900 and other variometers which work on the silicon pressure sensor principle."

    I know that this is the opposite problem to what you're seeing but it may still be relevant. Could there be a leak on the flask side of the
    mechanical vario? (unsupported guess by me).


    I forget where the T is, but it's reasonable aft. Anyway, it's not the pressure-sensor e-vario that has a problem. An air leak is of course
    possible, but where would a leak cause the mechanical vario to show an
    endless indication of strong sink while cruising? The vario shows sink
    when air is moving from the TE probe into the flask. The TE probe
    pressure is LOWER than the static, thus a disconnected or leaky flask
    should indicate lift not sink. A leak on the TE probe line should
    affect the e-vario too, and would make the TE compensation partial, but
    would not result in endless "sink".

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jay Campbell@21:1/5 to john firth on Wed Aug 17 07:17:57 2022
    On Wednesday, August 17, 2022 at 9:15:30 AM UTC-4, john firth wrote:
    On Wednesday, August 17, 2022 at 8:31:41 AM UTC-4, Hank Nixon wrote:
    On Tuesday, August 16, 2022 at 10:18:26 PM UTC-4, Moshe Braner wrote:
    So we have this plain mechanical vario in a glider, connected to a TE probe and a flask. The TE probe is also connected to an electronic
    vario with a pressure sensor, which is not ideal for the electronic vario, but shouldn't affect the mechanical one much. While thermaling, the mechanical vario shows lift, varying similarly to what the electronic one shows. But while cruising, the mechanical vario is continuously PEGGED DOWN. Well sometimes for a little while it is not quite pegged, but still way down, around -8 knots. At the same time the electronic one (if the Speed Control function is turned off) is showing reasonable and varying sink rates. What could cause that behavior?
    Don't outthink this one.
    1)Never connect varios in series.
    2) If using a common TE source connect as far away from variometers as possible.
    3) Leak check circuits independently.
    4) Verify correct connections.
    UH
    Check for vario case leaks; glass seal.
    JMF
    IMHO "checking for leaks" without the right equipment and knowing exactly where leaks can occur is an exercise in futility. At a minimum, you need a combo pressure-vacuum gauge, designed plugs, syringe, valve, and several hours of watching time to
    detect tiny leaks. (And don't forget to cut off both ends of the suspect tubing where they stretch over their fittings.) Any over or under pressure of a device can ruin it, so know what you are doing. Easier and cheaper: Replace the suspect lines.
    Last comment: assure that the length of the tubing after the split to the mechanical and pressure varios are the same and consider lengthening them both by adding a couple of loops to the tubing to diminish the effect of the different flow rates between
    the two types of devices. Good luck!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From krasw@21:1/5 to All on Wed Aug 17 07:28:11 2022
    Sounds like you have problem with mechanical vario. Hard to imagine scenario where static leak would not be visible on both instruments.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Moshe Braner@21:1/5 to krasw on Wed Aug 17 10:41:18 2022
    On 8/17/2022 10:28 AM, krasw wrote:
    Sounds like you have problem with mechanical vario. Hard to imagine scenario where static leak would not be visible on both instruments.


    Yup. I can't think of any point in the system where just an air leak
    would explain the behavior we're seeing. Unless the e-vario pumps air
    out of its TE port the whole time you're cruising... Would be nice to
    have an hypothesis on what COULD be the problem. Otherwise it's
    shooting in the dark. Perhaps we should start by inserting a different mechanical vario into the same air lines and compare the behavior?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Galloway@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Wed Aug 17 08:27:19 2022
    On Wednesday, 17 August 2022 at 15:18:00 UTC+1, [email protected] wrote:
    On Wednesday, August 17, 2022 at 9:15:30 AM UTC-4, john firth wrote:
    On Wednesday, August 17, 2022 at 8:31:41 AM UTC-4, Hank Nixon wrote:
    On Tuesday, August 16, 2022 at 10:18:26 PM UTC-4, Moshe Braner wrote:
    So we have this plain mechanical vario in a glider, connected to a TE probe and a flask. The TE probe is also connected to an electronic vario with a pressure sensor, which is not ideal for the electronic vario, but shouldn't affect the mechanical one much. While thermaling, the mechanical vario shows lift, varying similarly to what the electronic one shows. But while cruising, the mechanical vario is continuously PEGGED DOWN. Well sometimes for a little while it is not quite pegged, but still way down, around -8 knots. At the same time the
    electronic one (if the Speed Control function is turned off) is showing
    reasonable and varying sink rates. What could cause that behavior?
    Don't outthink this one.
    1)Never connect varios in series.
    2) If using a common TE source connect as far away from variometers as possible.
    3) Leak check circuits independently.
    4) Verify correct connections.
    UH
    Check for vario case leaks; glass seal.
    JMF
    IMHO "checking for leaks" without the right equipment and knowing exactly where leaks can occur is an exercise in futility. At a minimum, you need a combo pressure-vacuum gauge, designed plugs, syringe, valve, and several hours of watching time to
    detect tiny leaks. (And don't forget to cut off both ends of the suspect tubing where they stretch over their fittings.) Any over or under pressure of a device can ruin it, so know what you are doing. Easier and cheaper: Replace the suspect lines. Last
    comment: assure that the length of the tubing after the split to the mechanical and pressure varios are the same and consider lengthening them both by adding a couple of loops to the tubing to diminish the effect of the different flow rates between the
    two types of devices. Good luck!

    I don't use all that equipment to check for leaks big enough to affect function. Observing the caveats about isolating the relevant tube from other instruments etc. just block off the source end (e.g. TE probe, static, pitot etc) then suck on the
    other end and plug it with your tongue. If your tongue stays stuck for 20 seconds then it is OK. As recommended by ESA Systems probe manufacturers for checking TE systems for leaks.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Eric Greenwell@21:1/5 to Moshe Braner on Wed Aug 17 09:23:42 2022
    On 8/17/2022 7:41 AM, Moshe Braner wrote:
    On 8/17/2022 10:28 AM, krasw wrote:
    Sounds like you have problem with mechanical vario. Hard to imagine scenario where
    static leak would not be visible on both instruments.


    Yup.  I can't think of any point in the system where just an air leak would explain the
    behavior we're seeing.  Unless the e-vario pumps air out of its TE port the whole time
    you're cruising...  Would be nice to have an hypothesis on what COULD be the problem.
    Otherwise it's shooting in the dark.  Perhaps we should start by inserting a different
    mechanical vario into the same air lines and compare the behavior?

    Does TE seem to work? Can you duplicate the problem on the ground?

    My guess is the mechanical vario has a leak. Substitute another mechanical vario, and test
    again.

    You might be able to test the vario without flying, by blocking the port to the flask with
    short, plugged piece of tubing, and gently blowing on a tube connected to the TE/Static
    port. The needle on a leaky vario will show sink; the needle on a good vario should remain
    still.

    --
    Eric Greenwell - USA
    - "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation"
    https://sites.google.com/site/motorgliders/publications

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Hank Nixon@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Wed Aug 17 10:14:24 2022
    On Wednesday, August 17, 2022 at 10:18:00 AM UTC-4, [email protected] wrote:
    On Wednesday, August 17, 2022 at 9:15:30 AM UTC-4, john firth wrote:
    On Wednesday, August 17, 2022 at 8:31:41 AM UTC-4, Hank Nixon wrote:
    On Tuesday, August 16, 2022 at 10:18:26 PM UTC-4, Moshe Braner wrote:
    So we have this plain mechanical vario in a glider, connected to a TE probe and a flask. The TE probe is also connected to an electronic vario with a pressure sensor, which is not ideal for the electronic vario, but shouldn't affect the mechanical one much. While thermaling, the mechanical vario shows lift, varying similarly to what the electronic one shows. But while cruising, the mechanical vario is continuously PEGGED DOWN. Well sometimes for a little while it is not quite pegged, but still way down, around -8 knots. At the same time the
    electronic one (if the Speed Control function is turned off) is showing
    reasonable and varying sink rates. What could cause that behavior?
    Don't outthink this one.
    1)Never connect varios in series.
    2) If using a common TE source connect as far away from variometers as possible.
    3) Leak check circuits independently.
    4) Verify correct connections.
    UH
    Check for vario case leaks; glass seal.
    JMF
    IMHO "checking for leaks" without the right equipment and knowing exactly where leaks can occur is an exercise in futility. At a minimum, you need a combo pressure-vacuum gauge, designed plugs, syringe, valve, and several hours of watching time to
    detect tiny leaks. (And don't forget to cut off both ends of the suspect tubing where they stretch over their fittings.) Any over or under pressure of a device can ruin it, so know what you are doing. Easier and cheaper: Replace the suspect lines. Last
    comment: assure that the length of the tubing after the split to the mechanical and pressure varios are the same and consider lengthening them both by adding a couple of loops to the tubing to diminish the effect of the different flow rates between the
    two types of devices. Good luck!

    Every glider comes with a pressure gage that will work for trouble shooting. It is known as an ASI. With some tubing and a couple of tees the whole system can be leak checked. Care must be taken not to over pressure. Alternatively a piece of tubing and
    a stick to hold it vertical makes a useful manometer.
    Be careful applying pressure to mechanical varios.
    I have found the connection fittings on the back of Winter varios loose on more than one occasion.
    UH

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From kinsell@21:1/5 to Moshe Braner on Wed Aug 17 10:36:32 2022
    On 8/17/22 08:41, Moshe Braner wrote:
    On 8/17/2022 10:28 AM, krasw wrote:
    Sounds like you have problem with mechanical vario. Hard to imagine
    scenario where static leak would not be visible on both instruments.


    Yup.  I can't think of any point in the system where just an air leak
    would explain the behavior we're seeing.  Unless the e-vario pumps air
    out of its TE port the whole time you're cruising...  Would be nice to
    have an hypothesis on what COULD be the problem.  Otherwise it's
    shooting in the dark.  Perhaps we should start by inserting a different mechanical vario into the same air lines and compare the behavior?


    I'd replumb it to eliminate the electronic vario temporarily. It's most
    likely a problem inside the mechanical vario or flask, and this would
    help narrow it down.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Moshe Braner@21:1/5 to Eric Greenwell on Wed Aug 17 13:42:12 2022
    On 8/17/2022 12:23 PM, Eric Greenwell wrote:
    On 8/17/2022 7:41 AM, Moshe Braner wrote:
    On 8/17/2022 10:28 AM, krasw wrote:
    Sounds like you have problem with mechanical vario. Hard to imagine
    scenario where static leak would not be visible on both instruments.


    Yup.  I can't think of any point in the system where just an air leak
    would explain the behavior we're seeing.  Unless the e-vario pumps air
    out of its TE port the whole time you're cruising...  Would be nice to
    have an hypothesis on what COULD be the problem. Otherwise it's
    shooting in the dark.  Perhaps we should start by inserting a
    different mechanical vario into the same air lines and compare the
    behavior?

    Does TE seem to work? Can you duplicate the problem on the ground?

    My guess is the mechanical vario has a leak. Substitute another
    mechanical vario, and test again.

    You might be able to test the vario without flying, by blocking the port
    to the flask with short, plugged piece of tubing, and gently blowing on
    a tube connected to the TE/Static port. The needle on a leaky vario will
    show sink; the needle on a good vario should remain still.


    Right. But if instead you could SUCK on the TE/Static port, the leaky
    vario would show LIFT. In flight, the pressure from the TE probe is
    LOWER than the static, or cabin pressure. I.e., a leaky vario, or
    flask, or connection to flask, should cause the instrument to show LIFT.
    Why is the vario in question showing massive SINK (pegged down)? And
    why only in cruise? It is showing reasonable lift while circling in a
    thermal.

    I suppose we should carefully try a slow cruise, at speeds used in
    thermaling, and see if what determines the vario's "cruise" behavior is
    the air speed. But so far we haven't noticed a relationship to
    airspeed. So perhaps what causes the instrument to peg down "in cruise"
    is the fact that it is in sink at all? Could the instrument be
    defective in a way that causes the needle deflection to be much too
    large in sink, but normal (or not very large) in lift?

    To be specific, it is a standard Winter brand 80mm mechanical vario, and
    it is probably some 40 years old.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Eric Greenwell@21:1/5 to Moshe Braner on Wed Aug 17 10:53:27 2022
    On 8/17/2022 10:42 AM, Moshe Braner wrote:
    On 8/17/2022 12:23 PM, Eric Greenwell wrote:
    On 8/17/2022 7:41 AM, Moshe Braner wrote:
    On 8/17/2022 10:28 AM, krasw wrote:
    Sounds like you have problem with mechanical vario. Hard to imagine scenario where
    static leak would not be visible on both instruments.


    Yup.  I can't think of any point in the system where just an air leak would explain the
    behavior we're seeing.  Unless the e-vario pumps air out of its TE port the whole time
    you're cruising...  Would be nice to have an hypothesis on what COULD be the problem.
    Otherwise it's shooting in the dark.  Perhaps we should start by inserting a different
    mechanical vario into the same air lines and compare the behavior?

    Does TE seem to work? Can you duplicate the problem on the ground?

    My guess is the mechanical vario has a leak. Substitute another mechanical vario, and
    test again.

    You might be able to test the vario without flying, by blocking the port to the flask
    with short, plugged piece of tubing, and gently blowing on a tube connected to the
    TE/Static port. The needle on a leaky vario will show sink; the needle on a good vario
    should remain still.


    Right.  But if instead you could SUCK on the TE/Static port, the leaky vario would show
    LIFT.  In flight, the pressure from the TE probe is LOWER than the static, or cabin
    pressure.  I.e., a leaky vario, or flask, or connection to flask, should cause the
    instrument to show LIFT.  Why is the vario in question showing massive SINK (pegged
    down)?  And why only in cruise?  It is showing reasonable lift while circling in a thermal.

    I suppose we should carefully try a slow cruise, at speeds used in thermaling, and see if
    what determines the vario's "cruise" behavior is the air speed.  But so far we haven't
    noticed a relationship to airspeed.  So perhaps what causes the instrument to peg down "in
    cruise" is the fact that it is in sink at all?  Could the instrument be defective in a way
    that causes the needle deflection to be much too large in sink, but normal (or not very
    large) in lift?

    To be specific, it is a standard Winter brand 80mm mechanical vario, and it is probably
    some 40 years old.

    The difference in behavior between thermalling and cruise might be due to cockpit
    pressure, which might affect a leak.

    --
    Eric Greenwell - USA
    - "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation"
    https://sites.google.com/site/motorgliders/publications

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mark Mocho@21:1/5 to All on Wed Aug 17 11:09:41 2022
    Mike Borgelt of Borgelt Instruments has a good overview about pneumatic leaks in glider instruments. It covers detection, diagnosis and repair of leaks. The article can be found here: http://www.borgeltinstruments.com/?page_id=252. Additionally, Lee
    Kuhlke had an article in Soaring magazine from around 2005 that covered the same topic. I have referred to both when chasing down problems in several gliders.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rakel@21:1/5 to Mark Mocho on Wed Aug 17 17:18:20 2022
    On Wednesday, August 17, 2022 at 2:09:43 PM UTC-4, Mark Mocho wrote:
    Mike Borgelt of Borgelt Instruments has a good overview about pneumatic leaks in glider instruments. It covers detection, diagnosis and repair of leaks. The article can be found here: http://www.borgeltinstruments.com/?page_id=252. Additionally, Lee
    Kuhlke had an article in Soaring magazine from around 2005 that covered the same topic. I have referred to both when chasing down problems in several gliders.
    Caution with this link. I got a security alert.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steve Leonard@21:1/5 to Rakel on Fri Aug 19 09:30:01 2022
    On Wednesday, August 17, 2022 at 7:18:22 PM UTC-5, Rakel wrote:
    On Wednesday, August 17, 2022 at 2:09:43 PM UTC-4, Mark Mocho wrote:
    Mike Borgelt of Borgelt Instruments has a good overview about pneumatic leaks in glider instruments. It covers detection, diagnosis and repair of leaks. The article can be found here: http://www.borgeltinstruments.com/?page_id=252. Additionally, Lee
    Kuhlke had an article in Soaring magazine from around 2005 that covered the same topic. I have referred to both when chasing down problems in several gliders.
    Caution with this link. I got a security alert.

    Rakel, you may want to try a second time. Using Chrome, and a Windows 10 machine, the first time I selected the link Mark provided, I was taken to some other site asking me to "allow" it to "show notifications". I blocked, closed, and selected the link
    a second time, and it went to the Borgelt page. Computers are weird! Especially if running Chrome on Windows 10!

    Steve Leonard

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Darren Braun@21:1/5 to All on Tue Aug 23 12:09:05 2022
    mmm. It's actually that the webserver at www.borgeltinstruments.com does not support encryption so technically packets transmitted and received are exposed and not private. I would not send any personal information etc, ..certainly not buy anything
    from the site directly. Just be aware if you choose to visit the page.
    Darren

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Moshe Braner@21:1/5 to Eric Greenwell on Mon Sep 12 19:22:02 2022
    On 8/17/2022 1:53 PM, Eric Greenwell wrote:
    On 8/17/2022 10:42 AM, Moshe Braner wrote:
    On 8/17/2022 12:23 PM, Eric Greenwell wrote:
    On 8/17/2022 7:41 AM, Moshe Braner wrote:
    On 8/17/2022 10:28 AM, krasw wrote:
    Sounds like you have problem with mechanical vario. Hard to imagine
    scenario where static leak would not be visible on both instruments. >>>>>

    Yup.  I can't think of any point in the system where just an air
    leak would explain the behavior we're seeing.  Unless the e-vario
    pumps air out of its TE port the whole time you're cruising...
    Would be nice to have an hypothesis on what COULD be the problem.
    Otherwise it's shooting in the dark.  Perhaps we should start by
    inserting a different mechanical vario into the same air lines and
    compare the behavior?

    Does TE seem to work? Can you duplicate the problem on the ground?

    My guess is the mechanical vario has a leak. Substitute another
    mechanical vario, and test again.

    You might be able to test the vario without flying, by blocking the
    port to the flask with short, plugged piece of tubing, and gently
    blowing on a tube connected to the TE/Static port. The needle on a
    leaky vario will show sink; the needle on a good vario should remain
    still.


    Right.  But if instead you could SUCK on the TE/Static port, the leaky
    vario would show LIFT.  In flight, the pressure from the TE probe is
    LOWER than the static, or cabin pressure.  I.e., a leaky vario, or
    flask, or connection to flask, should cause the instrument to show
    LIFT.  Why is the vario in question showing massive SINK (pegged
    down)?  And why only in cruise?  It is showing reasonable lift while
    circling in a thermal.

    I suppose we should carefully try a slow cruise, at speeds used in
    thermaling, and see if what determines the vario's "cruise" behavior
    is the air speed.  But so far we haven't noticed a relationship to
    airspeed.  So perhaps what causes the instrument to peg down "in
    cruise" is the fact that it is in sink at all?  Could the instrument
    be defective in a way that causes the needle deflection to be much too
    large in sink, but normal (or not very large) in lift?

    To be specific, it is a standard Winter brand 80mm mechanical vario,
    and it is probably some 40 years old.

    The difference in behavior between thermalling and cruise might be due
    to cockpit pressure, which might affect a leak.


    Followup: We replaced the mechanical vario with another mechanical
    vario we had on hand, using the existing TE probe, flask, and plumbing.
    In flight it correctly showed lift and sink, the same as the
    electronic vario. The TE compensation seems good.

    So presumably the old vario itself is faulty. I wonder how it's built
    inside, and what internal malfunction would make it work normally for
    lift but greatly over-react to sink.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Moshe Braner@21:1/5 to Mark Mocho on Mon Sep 12 21:47:36 2022
    On 9/12/2022 9:40 PM, Mark Mocho wrote:

    Followup: We replaced the mechanical vario with another mechanical
    vario we had on hand, using the existing TE probe, flask, and plumbing.
    In flight it correctly showed lift and sink, the same as the
    electronic vario. The TE compensation seems good.

    So presumably the old vario itself is faulty. I wonder how it's built
    inside, and what internal malfunction would make it work normally for
    lift but greatly over-react to sink.

    I would inspect the gasket sealing the glass to the bezel. Variometers are dependent on the case being sealed from the outside air pressure. Assuming the fittings are sound and the case is not cracked, the glass to bezel seal is suspect.


    Why would that affect the reading asymmetrically, with the ups showing
    normally and the downs greatly amplified?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mark Mocho@21:1/5 to All on Mon Sep 12 18:40:09 2022
    Followup: We replaced the mechanical vario with another mechanical
    vario we had on hand, using the existing TE probe, flask, and plumbing.
    In flight it correctly showed lift and sink, the same as the
    electronic vario. The TE compensation seems good.

    So presumably the old vario itself is faulty. I wonder how it's built
    inside, and what internal malfunction would make it work normally for
    lift but greatly over-react to sink.

    I would inspect the gasket sealing the glass to the bezel. Variometers are dependent on the case being sealed from the outside air pressure. Assuming the fittings are sound and the case is not cracked, the glass to bezel seal is suspect.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mark Mocho@21:1/5 to All on Mon Sep 12 19:12:05 2022
    Why would that affect the reading asymmetrically, with the ups showing normally and the downs greatly amplified?

    It is possible that a broken gasket could "flap" in one direction on inflow to the case and seal when the airflow direction is reversed. At some point, there comes a time that old instruments just need to be retired. Nothing lasts forever, with the
    possible exceptions of Model A Fords, DC-3s. 1-26s and Volkswagens. But they take a lot of dedicated maintenance from some certifiably insane people.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Moshe Braner@21:1/5 to Hank Nixon on Tue Sep 13 09:06:29 2022
    On 9/13/2022 8:42 AM, Hank Nixon wrote:
    On Monday, September 12, 2022 at 9:47:38 PM UTC-4, Moshe Braner wrote:
    On 9/12/2022 9:40 PM, Mark Mocho wrote:

    Followup: We replaced the mechanical vario with another mechanical
    vario we had on hand, using the existing TE probe, flask, and plumbing. >>>> In flight it correctly showed lift and sink, the same as the
    electronic vario. The TE compensation seems good.

    So presumably the old vario itself is faulty. I wonder how it's built
    inside, and what internal malfunction would make it work normally for
    lift but greatly over-react to sink.

    I would inspect the gasket sealing the glass to the bezel. Variometers are dependent on the case being sealed from the outside air pressure. Assuming the fittings are sound and the case is not cracked, the glass to bezel seal is suspect.

    Why would that affect the reading asymmetrically, with the ups showing
    normally and the downs greatly amplified?

    One possibility is that it was worked on by someone. Mechanical variometers, such as Winter varios, have a light spring that centers them that is connected to the needle assembly and an adjustment disc. It is used to center the instrument at assembly.
    Over time the needle can become lighter, due to drying out of the paint, and even flaking off. Rotating the adjustment disc can re center the instrument but it unbalances the response. Holding the instrument face up will indicate if the adjustment is
    off. if it changes when going to face vertical it is an indication that the needle weight is not balanced. Correction is to center with the face up and then add a small amount of weight to the needle. I use a tiny drop of epoxy. Iyt is delicate work ,
    but can be done. The other choice is use as wall decoration.
    Also while doing all of this is make sure there are no case leaks.
    UH


    Thank you UH. Indeed, now that I have the instrument in hand out of the glider, the needle is very close to zero when the face is vertical, but
    holding it face-up makes the needle show -3.5 knots. I suppose there's
    no harm in trying to fix it rather than retiring it. Would nail polish
    work instead of epoxy?

    I also tried this: attached a short hose to one port, blow on it gently,
    the needle moves. Using one port it moves up some. Using the other
    port it moves down a lot more for the same strength of blowing (not
    precise, but convincing). As for case leaks, blowing on the hose while plugging the other port, the needle does not move at all. In both
    directions.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Hank Nixon@21:1/5 to Moshe Braner on Tue Sep 13 05:42:55 2022
    On Monday, September 12, 2022 at 9:47:38 PM UTC-4, Moshe Braner wrote:
    On 9/12/2022 9:40 PM, Mark Mocho wrote:

    Followup: We replaced the mechanical vario with another mechanical
    vario we had on hand, using the existing TE probe, flask, and plumbing. >> In flight it correctly showed lift and sink, the same as the
    electronic vario. The TE compensation seems good.

    So presumably the old vario itself is faulty. I wonder how it's built
    inside, and what internal malfunction would make it work normally for
    lift but greatly over-react to sink.

    I would inspect the gasket sealing the glass to the bezel. Variometers are dependent on the case being sealed from the outside air pressure. Assuming the fittings are sound and the case is not cracked, the glass to bezel seal is suspect.

    Why would that affect the reading asymmetrically, with the ups showing normally and the downs greatly amplified?

    One possibility is that it was worked on by someone. Mechanical variometers, such as Winter varios, have a light spring that centers them that is connected to the needle assembly and an adjustment disc. It is used to center the instrument at assembly.
    Over time the needle can become lighter, due to drying out of the paint, and even flaking off. Rotating the adjustment disc can re center the instrument but it unbalances the response. Holding the instrument face up will indicate if the adjustment is off.
    if it changes when going to face vertical it is an indication that the needle weight is not balanced. Correction is to center with the face up and then add a small amount of weight to the needle. I use a tiny drop of epoxy. Iyt is delicate work , but
    can be done. The other choice is use as wall decoration.
    Also while doing all of this is make sure there are no case leaks.
    UH

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From kevin anderson@21:1/5 to All on Sun Sep 18 10:24:12 2022
    I have a friend that has sent several back to Winter to be rebuilt, but I do not know the cost of the work.

    Kevin
    92

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to kevin anderson on Sun Sep 18 18:42:00 2022
    On Sunday, September 18, 2022 at 1:24:14 PM UTC-4, kevin anderson wrote:
    I have a friend that has sent several back to Winter to be rebuilt, but I do not know the cost of the work.

    Kevin
    92
    I had a 57mm overhauled & new case 2 years ago. Can't find the exact amount but it was cheaper than buying a replacement. I subsequently found someone selling a used one for about the same price but was happy to get mine back with new papers🤷‍♂️

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Moshe Braner@21:1/5 to Tony on Mon Sep 19 09:13:21 2022
    On 9/18/2022 9:42 PM, Tony wrote:
    I had a 57mm overhauled & new case 2 years ago. Can't find the exact amount but it was cheaper than buying a replacement. I subsequently found someone selling a used one for about the same price but was happy to get mine back with new papers🤷�♂�



    And, as they say, we've had this same ax in our family for 5
    generations. We've replaced the handle twice, and the head once, but
    it's still the same ax. :-)

    Meanwhile, we've apparently fixed the vario using the method UH
    mentioned. Will report after testing it in flight.

    Also, while the face glass was off the instrument, found that blowing
    air (gently!) in the "up" direction (into the flask port) showed an
    indication, but it did not respond to blowing in the "down" direction
    (into the TE probe port). I interpret that to mean that the main air
    space inside the instrument is on the TE probe side of the air flow
    path. Thus, a leaky case would degrade the TE compensation, by mixing
    it somewhat with "cabin static", but would not affect the operation
    otherwise. It should still indicate almost-correct vertical speed
    (whether ascending and descending) as long as the horizontal speed is
    constant.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Moshe Braner@21:1/5 to Moshe Braner on Mon Oct 3 16:00:16 2022
    On 9/19/2022 9:13 AM, Moshe Braner wrote:

    Meanwhile, we've apparently fixed the vario using the method UH
    mentioned.  Will report after testing it in flight.


    Worked fine in an actual flight. Yay!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?Q?John_DeRosa_OHM_=E2=84=A6@21:1/5 to Moshe Braner on Tue Oct 4 08:02:48 2022
    On Monday, October 3, 2022 at 3:00:20 PM UTC-5, Moshe Braner wrote:
    On 9/19/2022 9:13 AM, Moshe Braner wrote:

    Meanwhile, we've apparently fixed the vario using the method UH
    mentioned. Will report after testing it in flight.
    Worked fine in an actual flight. Yay!


    On Monday, October 3, 2022 at 3:00:20 PM UTC-5, Moshe Braner wrote:
    On 9/19/2022 9:13 AM, Moshe Braner wrote:

    Meanwhile, we've apparently fixed the vario using the method UH
    mentioned. Will report after testing it in flight.
    Worked fine in an actual flight. Yay!
    I'm late in this conversation. Glad that this problem was fixed.

    I put together some accumulated knowledge in my
    pneumatic air line presentation you can find at Http://aviation.derosaweb.net/presentations/#airlines

    Let me know of any comments, additions, or dunder-headed corrections.

    - John (OHM)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)