• Moon - US plan to put a nuclear reactor on the lunar surface by 2030

    From a425couple@21:1/5 to All on Thu Aug 7 08:31:50 2025
    XPost: alt.astronomy, sci.military.naval, soc.history.war.misc
    XPost: alt.economics, or.politics

    from

    'We want to get there first and claim that for America': NASA chief
    explains push for nuclear reactor on the moon (video)
    News
    By Brett Tingley published 21 hours ago
    "If we're going to engage in the race to the moon and the race to Mars,
    we have to get our act together."







    Comments (12)
    When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here’s how it works.

    Click here for more Space.com videos...
    NASA's interim administrator says his call for the United States to put
    a nuclear reactor on the lunar surface by 2030 is part of a new race to
    the moon.

    Agency chief Sean Duffy made the remarks during a press conference
    titled "Unleashing American Drone Dominance" hosted by the U.S.
    Department of Transportation (which Duffy also runs) on Aug. 5.
    According to Duffy, the reactor is part of a new space race, one with
    the ultimate goal of establishing a sustained human presence on the moon.

    "We're in a race to the moon, in a race with China to the moon. And to
    have a base on the moon, we need energy," Duffy told reporters in
    response to a question about reports that surfaced earlier in the week
    about his ambitious directive to launch a 100-kilowatt nuclear reactor
    to the moon by 2030. Such a reactor would produce roughly the same
    amount of energy as an average U.S. household uses every 3.5 days.

    a man in a blue suit speaks in front of a plaque reading "united states department of transportation"

    Sean Duffy, U.S. Secretary of Transportation, speaks during a news
    conference in Washington, DC, US, on Tuesday, Aug. 5, 2025. (Image
    credit: Kent Nishimura/Bloomberg via Getty Images)
    Duffy went further than simply saying he wants the United States to beat
    China to the moon, however. The acting NASA chief said that he wants the
    U.S. to claim the "best" part of the moon for itself.

    You may like
    An illustration of people on a moon base with a red flag.
    China signs deal with Russia to build a power plant on the moon —
    potentially leaving the US in the dust
    Use of the Earth's moon is on the agenda of multiple nations.
    Can we actually build a thriving economy on and around the moon?
    A full-scale prototype of the Interlune excavator, which was developed
    in partnership with Vermeer. The excavator will harvest helium-3 on the
    moon, if all goes according to plan.
    Moon mining machine: Interlune unveils helium-3 harvester prototype (photo) "There's a certain part of the moon that everyone knows is the best,"
    Duffy said. "We have ice there. We have sunlight there. We want to get
    there first and claim that for America."

    Because the moon rotates so slowly, the lunar surface experiences two
    weeks of darkness at at a time. That means solar power won't be
    efficient to power a crewed outpost  — most robotic lunar rovers can't
    even survive the lunar night.

    In addition, NASA and other international space agencies are interested
    in establishing bases in the moon's south polar region, near permanently shadowed craters where water ice is thought to be abundant. But because
    these areas are permanently dark, solar power won't cut it. Having
    another source of energy production could enable human explorers to
    venture into new areas where the sun literally doesn't shine.

    Duffy was quick to point out that putting a nuclear reactor on the moon
    doesn't mean launching an active reactor atop a rocket. "We're not
    launching this live. That's obviously  — if you have any questions about that, no, we're not launching it live," Duffy pointed out.

    Get the Space.com Newsletter
    Breaking space news, the latest updates on rocket launches, skywatching
    events and more!

    Your Email Address
    Contact me with news and offers from other Future brands
    Receive email from us on behalf of our trusted partners or sponsors
    By submitting your information you agree to the Terms & Conditions and
    Privacy Policy and are aged 16 or over.
    Related Stories:
    — NASA aiming to build nuclear reactor on the moon by 2030

    — Nuclear power on the moon: NASA wraps up 1st phase of ambitious
    reactor project

    — 'We're in a space race.' NASA chief says US 'better watch out' for
    China's moon goals

    NASA plans on returning human explorers to the surface of the moon with
    its Artemis 3 mission, currently scheduled for no earlier than mid-2027.
    That mission will see a yet-to-be-named crew land near the moon's south
    pole for a six-day stay on the lunar surface  — twice as long as the
    Apollo astronauts spent on the moon.

    The interim NASA administrator went on to compare the two moon
    exploration programs, downplaying the public reach of his agency's own
    Artemis program. "A lot of people don't know even what Artemis is.
    Everyone knew what Apollo was. We all knew. The whole world knew what
    Apollo was. We were going to the moon; Artemis is, we're going back."

    Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions,
    night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment,
    let us know at: [email protected].

    Brett Tingley
    Brett Tingley
    Managing Editor, Space.com
    Brett is curious about emerging aerospace technologies, alternative
    launch concepts, military space developments and uncrewed aircraft
    systems. Brett's work has appeared on Scientific American, The War Zone, Popular Science, the History Channel, Science Discovery and more. Brett
    has English degrees from Clemson University and the University of North Carolina at Charlotte. In his free time, Brett enjoys skywatching
    throughout the dark skies of the Appalachian mountains.

    Load more comments
    Conversation
    Follow this conversation to be notified when new comments are postedfollow
    Log in|Sign up
    Please follow our community guidelines.


    Jump to log in or sign Up

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)