• =?UTF-8?Q?New_York_Times_columnist_admits_scientists_=E2=80=98badly?= =

    From a425couple@21:1/5 to All on Wed Mar 19 10:14:25 2025
    XPost: or.politics, seattle.politics, ca.politics
    XPost: fl.politics, alt.economics

    from https://nypost.com/2025/03/17/media/scientists-badly-misled-public-on-covid-19-origins-new-york-times-columnist/


    New York Times columnist admits scientists ‘badly misled’ public on COVID-19: ‘Five years too late’
    By Taylor Herzlich
    Published March 17, 2025, 2:16 p.m. ET

    99 Comments
    Keep Watching
    6
    Chris Cuomo called out Anderson Cooper as a 'fool' after CNN anchor told
    former NH Gov. Chris Sununu 'Don't be a d–k'Chris Cuomo called out
    Anderson Cooper as a 'fool' after CNN anchor told former NH Gov. Chris
    Sununu 'Don't be a d–k'
    The New York Times finally ran a column by a scientist who said the
    public was “badly misled” about the origins of COVID-19 — triggering backlash from readers who say the admission comes five years too late.

    In an opinion piece published Sunday, Zeynep Tufecki, a sociology
    professor at Princeton University, argued that officials and scientists
    hid facts, misled a Times journalist and colluded on campaigns to bury
    the possibility of a research lab leak in Wuhan, China.

    It has emerged that safety precautions at the Wuhan lab in question
    “might have been terrifyingly lax,” Tufecki wrote in her column, titled “We Were Badly Misled About the Event That Changed Our Lives.”

    Zeynep Tufecki at a media trade fair in Bavaria, Munich on Oct. 23, 2019.
    4
    Zeynep Tufecki argued in a new opinion piece for the New York Times that scientists “badly misled” the public on the origins of COVID-19. dpa/picture alliance via Getty Images
    Social media users were quick to accuse the Gray Lady of hypocrisy,
    circulating photos of a now-deleted 2021 post from Times journalist
    Apoorva Mandavilli that claimed the “lab leak theory” had “racist roots.”

    00:01
    04:33

    “Five years too late,” one user wrote about Tufecki’s article in a post that garnered 10,000 likes.

    “Remember when the NYT would call you a misinformation spreader, and
    social media platforms would ban you for believing COVID-19 originated
    in a lab?”

    Explore More

    CNN's Scott Jennings slams 'condescending' ex-Biden official in heated
    on-air exchange: 'Let me educate you'

    Voice of America goes silent as Trump signs executive order gutting
    network's parent agency
    Rep. Seth Moulton, D-Mass., warned Monday that his party needs to change
    course and stop alienating allies with far-left ideological litmus tests.
    Dem rep calls out own party for being 'out of touch' and alienating allies Another user wrote: “Any so-called COVID reckoning from the Times that
    fails to confront its own relentless lies isn’t a reckoning at all.”

    Meanwhile, some loyal left-leaning Times subscribers slammed the
    broadsheet for backtracking on its earlier COVID-19 articles.

    “The New York Times has intensely pursued every theory and lead on the origins of Covid-19, documented the political debate, funding,
    influence, and shifts in thinking among the scientific community, and
    reported on China’s censorship campaign that has stifled the search for truth,” a New York Times spokesperson told The Post in a statement.

    “The Times has helped readers navigate the coronavirus pandemic through independent, verified reporting, and any insinuation that we have not thoroughly pursued leads is false,” they added.

    For years, the CIA claimed it had insufficient evidence to determine
    whether the pandemic that shut down the country stemmed from a wet
    market in Wuhan or a research lab there.

    The New York Times logo above a doorway of their corporate headquarters
    on April 29, 2023.
    4
    Social media users were quick to accuse the New York Times of hypocrisy.
    Getty Images
    But the agency recently updated its assessment to favor the lab leak
    theory, albeit with “low confidence,” meaning it has incomplete evidence.

    The Department of Energy, which runs sophisticated labs, and the FBI had
    moved to back the theory in 2023.

    Tufecki acknowledged that “perhaps we were misled on purpose” about the virus’s origins.

    She took aim at a 2020 research paper in the journal Nature Medicine
    written by five prominent journalists — Kristian Andersen, Andrew
    Rambaut, W. Ian Lipkin, Edward Holmes and Robert Garry.

    Keep up with today's most important news

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)