1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. REC.AUTOS.MAKERS.FORD.MUS

  • '99 mustangs are ugly - COUNTERPOINT

    From [email protected]@21:1/5 to All on Fri Nov 13 13:21:20 2015
    On Thursday, March 4, 1999 at 12:00:00 AM UTC-8, NoOption5L wrote:
    In article <7bh26n$[email protected]>, lx50@*ix.netcom.com (Randy)
    writes:

    I think it looks like a cross between the Fox and the previous Mustang.

    Thats exactly what I've thought since the first time I saw one.
    I like it better then the SN95.

    It is a SN95 just a little different body panels on it than the 94-98...

    A little more horsepower a little more handling a little more money.

    A LOT faster, better handling, better ride, better braking, and a little more money.

    Patrick

    '93 Cobra (track numbers will be posted soon)
    '95 Accord EX (faster than a LX...an Accord LX)
    '87 5 liter 5 speed LX - SOLD! (14.2 @ 98 stock, 13.8 @ 101 lightly modded)

    I think that the new Mustang looks odd. It doesn't look muscular, but then again Mustangs haven't looked Muscular since the 70s. Although I think it will do fine, it looks like a great platform that most will mod to their liking. Who knows, in 2004-05
    the Mustangs might look even uglier....and then again in 2014-15....but that's light years away.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David@21:1/5 to All on Sat Nov 14 22:04:06 2015
    At Fri, 13 Nov 2015 13:21:20 -0800, hatakilla916 rearranged some electrons
    to write:


    I think that the new Mustang looks odd. It doesn't look muscular, but
    then again Mustangs haven't looked Muscular since the 70s. Although I
    think it will do fine, it looks like a great platform that most will mod
    to their liking. Who knows, in 2004-05 the Mustangs might look even uglier....and then again in 2014-15....but that's light years away.

    You're replying to a 15 year old post.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)