After the farce of last season I had given up on watch the highlights
of F1.
I made the mistake of settling down to watch today's, having
studiously avoided getting to know the result.
How many races a season are determined by mechanical failure or driver
error of the lower teams?
Alpha Tauri should be ashamed of themselves (well done Red Bull on
that play).
Perhaps take a leaf out of the Elimination Bicycle race where the last
drops out. Start at half way through the race and elimate the last
car every 4 laps getting rid of the "rubbish".
How many F1 races have you actually attended?
After the farce of last season I had given up on watch the highlights
of F1.
<snip>
I might look in again next season to see if anything has improved.
Still seething? :^)
OK. See you next season.
OK. See you next season.
After the farce of last season I had given up on watch the highlights
of F1.
I made the mistake of settling down to watch today's, having
studiously avoided getting to know the result.
How many races a season are determined by mechanical failure or driver
error of the lower teams?
Alpha Tauri should be ashamed of themselves (well done Red Bull on
that play).
Perhaps take a leaf out of the Elimination Bicycle race where the last
drops out. Start at half way through the race and elimate the last
car every 4 laps getting rid of the "rubbish".
Well done George on the call for softs, why didn't HAM/his team do the
same when it seemed so appropriate.
Alternativatly have a chance pack of cards and after qualifying the
cards are turned over one by one, eg car 4 hits car 5, or car 8 spins.
Oh and Ferrari. How many mistakes can you make in one race (after a
series of errors every race for the past few seasons) and still keep
your job. Knackers yard for the crippled horse.
I might look in again next season to see if anything has improved.
--I don't entirely disagree that I don't like the "lottery" element of race outcomes; when a team has done everything right and then something
AnthonyL
Why ever wait to finish a job before starting the next?
On 09/04/2022 01:48 PM, AnthonyL wrote:
After the farce of last season I had given up on watch the highlights
of F1.
I made the mistake of settling down to watch today's, having
studiously avoided getting to know the result.
How many races a season are determined by mechanical failure or driver
error of the lower teams?
Alpha Tauri should be ashamed of themselves (well done Red Bull on
that play).
Perhaps take a leaf out of the Elimination Bicycle race where the last
drops out. Start at half way through the race and elimate the last
car every 4 laps getting rid of the "rubbish".
How many F1 races have you actually attended?
Many fans would not be pleased when you had reduced the
field down to only 9 cars.
On Sunday, 4 September 2022 at 21:48:49 UTC+1, AnthonyL wrote:
After the farce of last season I had given up on watch the highlightsI don't entirely disagree that I don't like the "lottery" element of race outcomes; when a team has done everything right and then something
of F1.
I made the mistake of settling down to watch today's, having
studiously avoided getting to know the result.
How many races a season are determined by mechanical failure or driver
error of the lower teams?
Alpha Tauri should be ashamed of themselves (well done Red Bull on
that play).
Perhaps take a leaf out of the Elimination Bicycle race where the last
drops out. Start at half way through the race and elimate the last
car every 4 laps getting rid of the "rubbish".
Well done George on the call for softs, why didn't HAM/his team do the
same when it seemed so appropriate.
Alternativatly have a chance pack of cards and after qualifying the
cards are turned over one by one, eg car 4 hits car 5, or car 8 spins.
Oh and Ferrari. How many mistakes can you make in one race (after a
series of errors every race for the past few seasons) and still keep
your job. Knackers yard for the crippled horse.
I might look in again next season to see if anything has improved.
--
AnthonyL
Why ever wait to finish a job before starting the next?
utterly unconnected to their race causes them to lose out.
But on the flip side, it is a rare event where the outcome wouldn't otherwise be entirely predictable without something random happening.
Zaandvoort would have been one of those rare races where the pre-race expectations could have been misplaced as Ferrari underperformed,
Merc over-performed and had a great alternative strategy etc.
Had Ham taken the softs at the SC period he'd probably have banked second place, that's true. But the team gambled that he'd want a win or nothing, so left him with the only option that would see him starting the re-start with track position. Russell was lucky that he could free-stop without losing a top
three place and made the right call.
On Sun, 4 Sep 2022 14:58:04 -0700, a425couple <[email protected]>
wrote:
On 09/04/2022 01:48 PM, AnthonyL wrote:
After the farce of last season I had given up on watch the highlights
of F1.
I made the mistake of settling down to watch today's, having
studiously avoided getting to know the result.
How many races a season are determined by mechanical failure or driver
error of the lower teams?
Alpha Tauri should be ashamed of themselves (well done Red Bull on
that play).
Perhaps take a leaf out of the Elimination Bicycle race where the last
drops out. Start at half way through the race and elimate the last
car every 4 laps getting rid of the "rubbish".
How many F1 races have you actually attended?
I haven't. Telly makes more sense.
Many fans would not be pleased when you had reduced the
field down to only 9 cars.
I think many fans would be pleased to see a better standard of racing,
else may as well go to stock car races. Oh, don't tell me that F1
fans go for the thrills and spills and walk away disappointed if
no-one has flipped over.
Arrange it so that there should be 10 finishes. Give tenths of a
point so that 11th gets 0.9 etc. Cut down on poor cars/poor
drivers/poor teams have a misproportionate say in the outcome of the
top ten.
On Mon, 05 Sep 2022 11:52:47 GMT, [email protected]d (AnthonyL)
wrote:
On Sun, 4 Sep 2022 14:58:04 -0700, a425couple <[email protected]>
wrote:
On 09/04/2022 01:48 PM, AnthonyL wrote:
After the farce of last season I had given up on watch the highlights
of F1.
I made the mistake of settling down to watch today's, having
studiously avoided getting to know the result.
How many races a season are determined by mechanical failure or driver >>>> error of the lower teams?
Alpha Tauri should be ashamed of themselves (well done Red Bull on
that play).
Perhaps take a leaf out of the Elimination Bicycle race where the last >>>> drops out. Start at half way through the race and elimate the last
car every 4 laps getting rid of the "rubbish".
How many F1 races have you actually attended?
I haven't. Telly makes more sense.
Many fans would not be pleased when you had reduced the
field down to only 9 cars.
I think many fans would be pleased to see a better standard of racing,
else may as well go to stock car races. Oh, don't tell me that F1
fans go for the thrills and spills and walk away disappointed if
no-one has flipped over.
Arrange it so that there should be 10 finishes. Give tenths of a
point so that 11th gets 0.9 etc. Cut down on poor cars/poor
drivers/poor teams have a misproportionate say in the outcome of the
top ten.
Well fortunately I wasn't around to try and waste any time with the
Monza Grand Prix so where was Riccardo when he ruined the race?
AnthonyL <[email protected]d> wrote:
On Mon, 05 Sep 2022 11:52:47 GMT, [email protected]d (AnthonyL)
wrote:
<[email protected]> >> wrote:On Sun, 4 Sep 2022 14:58:04 -0700, a425couple
highlights >>>> of F1.
On 09/04/2022 01:48 PM, AnthonyL wrote:
After the farce of last season I had given up on watch the
driver >>>> error of the lower teams?
I made the mistake of settling down to watch today's, having
studiously avoided getting to know the result.
How many races a season are determined by mechanical failure or
on >>>> that play).
Alpha Tauri should be ashamed of themselves (well done Red Bull
the last >>>> drops out. Start at half way through the race and
Perhaps take a leaf out of the Elimination Bicycle race where
elimate the last >>>> car every 4 laps getting rid of the "rubbish".
racing, >> else may as well go to stock car races. Oh, don't tell me
How many F1 races have you actually attended?
I haven't. Telly makes more sense.
Many fans would not be pleased when you had reduced the
field down to only 9 cars.
I think many fans would be pleased to see a better standard of
that F1 >> fans go for the thrills and spills and walk away
disappointed if >> no-one has flipped over.
the >> top ten.
Arrange it so that there should be 10 finishes. Give tenths of a
point so that 11th gets 0.9 etc. Cut down on poor cars/poor
drivers/poor teams have a misproportionate say in the outcome of
Well fortunately I wasn't around to try and waste any time with the
Monza Grand Prix so where was Riccardo when he ruined the race?
Acting as a cork in the bottle.
On Mon, 05 Sep 2022 11:52:47 GMT, [email protected]d (AnthonyL)
wrote:
On Sun, 4 Sep 2022 14:58:04 -0700, a425couple <[email protected]>
wrote:
On 09/04/2022 01:48 PM, AnthonyL wrote:
After the farce of last season I had given up on watch the highlights
of F1.
I made the mistake of settling down to watch today's, having
studiously avoided getting to know the result.
How many races a season are determined by mechanical failure or driver >>>> error of the lower teams?
Alpha Tauri should be ashamed of themselves (well done Red Bull on
that play).
Perhaps take a leaf out of the Elimination Bicycle race where the last >>>> drops out. Start at half way through the race and elimate the last
car every 4 laps getting rid of the "rubbish".
How many F1 races have you actually attended?
I haven't. Telly makes more sense.
Many fans would not be pleased when you had reduced the
field down to only 9 cars.
I think many fans would be pleased to see a better standard of racing,
else may as well go to stock car races. Oh, don't tell me that F1
fans go for the thrills and spills and walk away disappointed if
no-one has flipped over.
Arrange it so that there should be 10 finishes. Give tenths of a
point so that 11th gets 0.9 etc. Cut down on poor cars/poor
drivers/poor teams have a misproportionate say in the outcome of the
top ten.
Well fortunately I wasn't around to try and waste any time with the
Monza Grand Prix so where was Riccardo when he ruined the race?
On 12/09/2022 3:00 am, AnthonyL wrote:
On Mon, 05 Sep 2022 11:52:47 GMT, [email protected]d (AnthonyL)
wrote:
On Sun, 4 Sep 2022 14:58:04 -0700, a425couple <[email protected]>
wrote:
On 09/04/2022 01:48 PM, AnthonyL wrote:
After the farce of last season I had given up on watch the highlights >>>> of F1.
I made the mistake of settling down to watch today's, having
studiously avoided getting to know the result.
How many races a season are determined by mechanical failure or driver >>>> error of the lower teams?
Alpha Tauri should be ashamed of themselves (well done Red Bull on
that play).
Perhaps take a leaf out of the Elimination Bicycle race where the last >>>> drops out. Start at half way through the race and elimate the last
car every 4 laps getting rid of the "rubbish".
How many F1 races have you actually attended?
I haven't. Telly makes more sense.
Many fans would not be pleased when you had reduced the
field down to only 9 cars.
I think many fans would be pleased to see a better standard of racing,
else may as well go to stock car races. Oh, don't tell me that F1
fans go for the thrills and spills and walk away disappointed if
no-one has flipped over.
Arrange it so that there should be 10 finishes. Give tenths of a
point so that 11th gets 0.9 etc. Cut down on poor cars/poor
drivers/poor teams have a misproportionate say in the outcome of the
top ten.
Well fortunately I wasn't around to try and waste any time with the
Monza Grand Prix so where was Riccardo when he ruined the race?
On the side of the track.Why we can't trust the best drivers in the world, on a dry track, under (say) waved yellows
geoff
On Sunday, 11 September 2022 at 23:16:51 UTC+1, geoff wrote:
On 12/09/2022 3:00 am, AnthonyL wrote:Why we can't trust the best drivers in the world, on a dry track, under (say) waved yellows
On Mon, 05 Sep 2022 11:52:47 GMT, [email protected]d (AnthonyL)On the side of the track.
wrote:
On Sun, 4 Sep 2022 14:58:04 -0700, a425couple <[email protected]>
wrote:
On 09/04/2022 01:48 PM, AnthonyL wrote:
After the farce of last season I had given up on watch the highlights >>>>>> of F1.
I made the mistake of settling down to watch today's, having
studiously avoided getting to know the result.
How many races a season are determined by mechanical failure or driver >>>>>> error of the lower teams?
Alpha Tauri should be ashamed of themselves (well done Red Bull on >>>>>> that play).
Perhaps take a leaf out of the Elimination Bicycle race where the last >>>>>> drops out. Start at half way through the race and elimate the last >>>>>> car every 4 laps getting rid of the "rubbish".
How many F1 races have you actually attended?
I haven't. Telly makes more sense.
Many fans would not be pleased when you had reduced the
field down to only 9 cars.
I think many fans would be pleased to see a better standard of racing, >>>> else may as well go to stock car races. Oh, don't tell me that F1
fans go for the thrills and spills and walk away disappointed if
no-one has flipped over.
Arrange it so that there should be 10 finishes. Give tenths of a
point so that 11th gets 0.9 etc. Cut down on poor cars/poor
drivers/poor teams have a misproportionate say in the outcome of the
top ten.
Well fortunately I wasn't around to try and waste any time with the
Monza Grand Prix so where was Riccardo when he ruined the race?
geoff
to pass a stationary car by the side of the track is a little beyond me.
Why we can't trust the best drivers in the world, on a dry track, under (say) waved yellows
to pass a stationary car by the side of the track is a little beyond me.
Agree entirely - the danger car is grossly overused.
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]d
says...
Why we can't trust the best drivers in the world, on a dry track, under (say) waved yellows
to pass a stationary car by the side of the track is a little beyond me.
Agree entirely - the danger car is grossly overused.
I think the death of Jules Bianchi has a lot to do with it.
One death in F1 since 1994 and it involved an off track car crashing
earlier. Yes, big differences in circumstances (recovery truck present, weather conditions etc), but you have to be seen to be doing something.
VSC came as a result of that accident too.
--Yes, agreed and the lessons from Bianchi's death were significant and
Alan LeHun
On Monday, 12 September 2022 at 22:27:54 UTC+1, Alan LeHun wrote:
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]d
says...
Why we can't trust the best drivers in the world, on a dry track, under (say) waved yellows
to pass a stationary car by the side of the track is a little beyond me.
Agree entirely - the danger car is grossly overused.
I think the death of Jules Bianchi has a lot to do with it.
One death in F1 since 1994 and it involved an off track car crashing earlier. Yes, big differences in circumstances (recovery truck present, weather conditions etc), but you have to be seen to be doing something.
VSC came as a result of that accident too.
I know this is a sim model, but I suppose this is the sort of crash they are mitigating--Yes, agreed and the lessons from Bianchi's death were significant and shouldn't be overlooked.
Alan LeHun
But on a dry track, on a zone that isn't in a run off area, in great visibility,
supported by appropriately marshalled flags etc?
The Bianchi incident was about a car hitting a recovery vehicle in soaking wet conditions with poor visbility in a run off area. Still a freak accident, but definitely factors there which could be foreseeable.
Has anyone ever crashed into the barriers between lesmo 1 and 2 without
being part of an active overtake?
On Tuesday, 13 September 2022 at 09:09:54 UTC+1, Matt Larkin wrote:
On Monday, 12 September 2022 at 22:27:54 UTC+1, Alan LeHun wrote:I know this is a sim model, but I suppose this is the sort of crash they are mitigating
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]dYes, agreed and the lessons from Bianchi's death were significant and
says...
I think the death of Jules Bianchi has a lot to do with it.Why we can't trust the best drivers in the world, on a dry track, under (say) waved yellows
to pass a stationary car by the side of the track is a little beyond me. >>>>>
Agree entirely - the danger car is grossly overused.
One death in F1 since 1994 and it involved an off track car crashing
earlier. Yes, big differences in circumstances (recovery truck present,
weather conditions etc), but you have to be seen to be doing something.
VSC came as a result of that accident too.
--
Alan LeHun
shouldn't be overlooked.
But on a dry track, on a zone that isn't in a run off area, in great visibility,
supported by appropriately marshalled flags etc?
The Bianchi incident was about a car hitting a recovery vehicle in soaking >> wet conditions with poor visbility in a run off area. Still a freak accident,
but definitely factors there which could be foreseeable.
Has anyone ever crashed into the barriers between lesmo 1 and 2 without
being part of an active overtake?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zxrMWVtjNUA&ab_channel=MarcusRacing
On Monday, 12 September 2022 at 22:27:54 UTC+1, Alan LeHun wrote:
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]dYes, agreed and the lessons from Bianchi's death were significant and shouldn't be overlooked.
says...
I think the death of Jules Bianchi has a lot to do with it.Why we can't trust the best drivers in the world, on a dry track, under (say) waved yellows
to pass a stationary car by the side of the track is a little beyond me. >>>>
Agree entirely - the danger car is grossly overused.
One death in F1 since 1994 and it involved an off track car crashing
earlier. Yes, big differences in circumstances (recovery truck present,
weather conditions etc), but you have to be seen to be doing something.
VSC came as a result of that accident too.
--
Alan LeHun
But on a dry track, on a zone that isn't in a run off area, in great visibility,
supported by appropriately marshalled flags etc?
The Bianchi incident was about a car hitting a recovery vehicle in soaking wet conditions with poor visbility in a run off area. Still a freak accident,
but definitely factors there which could be foreseeable.
Has anyone ever crashed into the barriers between lesmo 1 and 2 without
being part of an active overtake?
On 13/09/2022 8:09 pm, Matt Larkin wrote:
On Monday, 12 September 2022 at 22:27:54 UTC+1, Alan LeHun wrote:
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]dYes, agreed and the lessons from Bianchi's death were significant and
says...
I think the death of Jules Bianchi has a lot to do with it.Why we can't trust the best drivers in the world, on a dry track,
under (say) waved yellows
to pass a stationary car by the side of the track is a little
beyond me.
Agree entirely - the danger car is grossly overused.
One death in F1 since 1994 and it involved an off track car crashing
earlier. Yes, big differences in circumstances (recovery truck present,
weather conditions etc), but you have to be seen to be doing something.
VSC came as a result of that accident too.
--
Alan LeHun
shouldn't be overlooked.
But on a dry track, on a zone that isn't in a run off area, in great
visibility,
supported by appropriately marshalled flags etc?
On a straight where cars wanting to attempt overtakes ...
The Bianchi incident was about a car hitting a recovery vehicle in
soaking
wet conditions with poor visbility in a run off area. Still a freak
accident,
but definitely factors there which could be foreseeable.
Has anyone ever crashed into the barriers between lesmo 1 and 2 without
being part of an active overtake?
Like I said.
Should have been immediate Red Flag, then finish the race properly.
geoff
That's a pretty classic sort of crash, yeah.
On 2022-09-13 01:16, Matt Larkin wrote:At racing speed, yes. But if there were waved yellows before the
On Tuesday, 13 September 2022 at 09:09:54 UTC+1, Matt Larkin wrote:
On Monday, 12 September 2022 at 22:27:54 UTC+1, Alan LeHun wrote:I know this is a sim model, but I suppose this is the sort of crash they are
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]dYes, agreed and the lessons from Bianchi's death were significant and
says...
I think the death of Jules Bianchi has a lot to do with it.Why we can't trust the best drivers in the world, on a dry track, under (say) waved yellows
to pass a stationary car by the side of the track is a little beyond me.
Agree entirely - the danger car is grossly overused.
One death in F1 since 1994 and it involved an off track car crashing
earlier. Yes, big differences in circumstances (recovery truck present, >>> weather conditions etc), but you have to be seen to be doing something. >>>
VSC came as a result of that accident too.
--
Alan LeHun
shouldn't be overlooked.
But on a dry track, on a zone that isn't in a run off area, in great visibility,
supported by appropriately marshalled flags etc?
The Bianchi incident was about a car hitting a recovery vehicle in soaking >> wet conditions with poor visbility in a run off area. Still a freak accident,
but definitely factors there which could be foreseeable.
Has anyone ever crashed into the barriers between lesmo 1 and 2 without
being part of an active overtake?
mitigating
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zxrMWVtjNUA&ab_channel=MarcusRacingThat's a pretty classic sort of crash, yeah.
Drop one or two wheels off onto a lower traction surface...
...the car oversteers and slows (a little)...
...and when the car hooks up again, it launches to the INSIDE of the corner.
At racing speed, yes. But if there were waved yellows before the
corner, only the most idiotic F1 pilot should be having that sort of crash surely?
On Tuesday, 13 September 2022 at 09:25:27 UTC+1, Alan wrote:
On 2022-09-13 01:16, Matt Larkin wrote:At racing speed, yes. But if there were waved yellows before the
On Tuesday, 13 September 2022 at 09:09:54 UTC+1, Matt Larkin wrote:That's a pretty classic sort of crash, yeah.
On Monday, 12 September 2022 at 22:27:54 UTC+1, Alan LeHun wrote:I know this is a sim model, but I suppose this is the sort of crash they are
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]dYes, agreed and the lessons from Bianchi's death were significant and
says...
I think the death of Jules Bianchi has a lot to do with it.Why we can't trust the best drivers in the world, on a dry track, under (say) waved yellows
to pass a stationary car by the side of the track is a little beyond me.
Agree entirely - the danger car is grossly overused.
One death in F1 since 1994 and it involved an off track car crashing >>>>> earlier. Yes, big differences in circumstances (recovery truck present, >>>>> weather conditions etc), but you have to be seen to be doing something. >>>>>
VSC came as a result of that accident too.
--
Alan LeHun
shouldn't be overlooked.
But on a dry track, on a zone that isn't in a run off area, in great visibility,
supported by appropriately marshalled flags etc?
The Bianchi incident was about a car hitting a recovery vehicle in soaking >>>> wet conditions with poor visbility in a run off area. Still a freak accident,
but definitely factors there which could be foreseeable.
Has anyone ever crashed into the barriers between lesmo 1 and 2 without >>>> being part of an active overtake?
mitigating
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zxrMWVtjNUA&ab_channel=MarcusRacing
Drop one or two wheels off onto a lower traction surface...
...the car oversteers and slows (a little)...
...and when the car hooks up again, it launches to the INSIDE of the corner.
corner, only the most idiotic F1 pilot should be having that sort of crash surely?
Is it unlikely? Sure.
But:
Is it unlikely? Sure.
But:
On 2022-09-16 01:33, Matt Larkin wrote:
On Tuesday, 13 September 2022 at 09:25:27 UTC+1, Alan wrote:
almost immediately
almost immediately
Singapore - and so the soap opera drama continues:
<quote bbc>
Even Verstappen asked: "Are you sure?" when he was told he was
champion, reflecting the historical precedent that reduced points are
awarded in such circumstances.
But it seems that this protocol was inadvertently left out of the
rules when they were rewritten over last winter following the
controversial Belgian Grand Prix, when a result was declared despite
no racing taking place.
</quote>
Can't the FIA afford professionals?
After the farce of last season I had given up on watch the highlights
of F1.
I made the mistake of settling down to watch today's, having
studiously avoided getting to know the result.
How many races a season are determined by mechanical failure or driver
error of the lower teams?
Alpha Tauri should be ashamed of themselves (well done Red Bull on
that play).
Perhaps take a leaf out of the Elimination Bicycle race where the last
drops out. Start at half way through the race and elimate the last
car every 4 laps getting rid of the "rubbish".
Well done George on the call for softs, why didn't HAM/his team do the
same when it seemed so appropriate.
Alternativatly have a chance pack of cards and after qualifying the
cards are turned over one by one, eg car 4 hits car 5, or car 8 spins.
Oh and Ferrari. How many mistakes can you make in one race (after a
series of errors every race for the past few seasons) and still keep
your job. Knackers yard for the crippled horse.
I might look in again next season to see if anything has improved.
On Sun, 09 Oct 2022 10:10:54 GMT, [email protected]d (AnthonyL)
wrote:
Singapore - and so the soap opera drama continues:
<quote bbc>
Even Verstappen asked: "Are you sure?" when he was told he was
champion, reflecting the historical precedent that reduced points
are awarded in such circumstances.
But it seems that this protocol was inadvertently left out of the
rules when they were rewritten over last winter following the
controversial Belgian Grand Prix, when a result was declared despite
no racing taking place.
</quote>
Can't the FIA afford professionals?
Oh, and the tractor:
<quote>
Alex Wurz, the chairman of the Grand Prix Drivers' Association, said:
"We need to discuss a tractor on track... We can keep it short: this
must not happen, guys."
</quote>
On Sun, 04 Sep 2022 20:48:49 GMT, [email protected]d (AnthonyL)
wrote:
After the farce of last season I had given up on watch the
highlights of F1.
I made the mistake of settling down to watch today's, having
studiously avoided getting to know the result.
How many races a season are determined by mechanical failure or
driver error of the lower teams?
Alpha Tauri should be ashamed of themselves (well done Red Bull on
that play).
Perhaps take a leaf out of the Elimination Bicycle race where the
last drops out. Start at half way through the race and elimate the
last car every 4 laps getting rid of the "rubbish".
Well done George on the call for softs, why didn't HAM/his team do
the same when it seemed so appropriate.
Alternativatly have a chance pack of cards and after qualifying the
cards are turned over one by one, eg car 4 hits car 5, or car 8
spins.
Oh and Ferrari. How many mistakes can you make in one race (after a
series of errors every race for the past few seasons) and still keep
your job. Knackers yard for the crippled horse.
I might look in again next season to see if anything has improved.
Singapore - and so the soap opera drama continues:
<quote bbc>
Even Verstappen asked: "Are you sure?" when he was told he was
champion, reflecting the historical precedent that reduced points are
awarded in such circumstances.
But it seems that this protocol was inadvertently left out of the
rules when they were rewritten over last winter following the
controversial Belgian Grand Prix, when a result was declared despite
no racing taking place.
</quote>
Can't the FIA afford professionals?
On Sun, 04 Sep 2022 20:48:49 GMT, [email protected]d (AnthonyL)
wrote:
Can't the FIA afford professionals?
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 715 |
| Nodes: | 16 (3 / 13) |
| Uptime: | 19:42:11 |
| Calls: | 12,104 |
| Calls today: | 4 |
| Files: | 15,004 |
| Messages: | 6,518,093 |