On 10/5/23 9:47 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Thursday, October 5, 2023 at 9:16:00 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 10/5/23 10:35 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Thursday, October 5, 2023 at 5:21:22 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 10/4/23 10:14 PM, ScottW wrote:
Companies added 89,000 jobs last month, below the 153,000
gain that economists surveyed by Refinitiv predicted. That is
also much lower than the revised 180,000 increase recorded in
August.
I can see why you didn't cite the source as the BLS jobs report
comes out tomorrow.
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/10/03/business/economy/jolts-job-openings-layoffs.html
Openings don't mean shit. I've seen reqs approved but not funded.
Your company must suck.
They all do in some ways.
They show as job openings but are corp internal placement only.
You guys are desperately grasping at any "good news" straw you
can find.
Says the guy grasping at any bad news he can find. You just blamed
Joe for your hot water not being hot enough! And for any bump in
gasoline prices. (I just paid $3.11/gallon, btw.)
When the BLS report comes out, we'll see if it hits the estimate or
not, pending revision.
We'll have to wait for the revision of the revision to get anything
close to correct from this propagandizing admin.
That's just because you hate anything that can credibly contradict you.
The jobs report is in: jobs added about twice the number expected and unemployment steady.
https://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm
Goldman called it: "We do not place much weight on the ADP miss because
of ADP’s negative correlation with BLS private payrolls since the introduction of the new methodology ... We left our nonfarm payroll
forecast unchanged at +200k ahead of Friday’s release."
Yes, the leftist propagandists of Goldman Sachs.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)