1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. REC.AUDIO.OPINION

  • 10 takeaways from a report most of you will

    From ScottW@21:1/5 to All on Thu May 18 10:26:10 2023
    gouge your eyes out with a red hot poker before reading.

    https://justthenews.com/government/federal-agencies/holdtop-10-takeaways-durham-report

    ScottW

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mINE109@21:1/5 to ScottW on Thu May 18 15:20:52 2023
    On 5/18/23 12:26 PM, ScottW wrote:
    gouge your eyes out with a red hot poker before reading.

    https://justthenews.com/government/federal-agencies/holdtop-10-takeaways-durham-report

    Anything in there not already in the Senate Report or the IG findings?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ScottW@21:1/5 to All on Thu May 18 19:55:24 2023
    On Thursday, May 18, 2023 at 1:20:55 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 5/18/23 12:26 PM, ScottW wrote:
    gouge your eyes out with a red hot poker before reading.

    https://justthenews.com/government/federal-agencies/holdtop-10-takeaways-durham-report
    Anything in there not already in the Senate Report or the IG findings?

    I don't know. Did they note that British Intel wanted nothing to do with crossfire hurricane?

    United Kingdom intelligence service officials were unwilling to aid in the investigation, contending that it was devoid of predicating evidence.
    "Later in the Fall of 2016, UK ALAT-1 was at FBI Headquarters with some of his British Intelligence Service-I counterparts," Durham notes, referencing a UK intelligence official. "While there, members of the Crossfire Hurricane team played the audio/
    visual recordings of CHS-1 's August 20, 2016 meeting with Carter Page. UK ALAT-1 said the effect on the British Intelligence Service-I personnel was not positive because of the lack of any evidence corning out of the conversation."
    "UK ALAT-1 told the OIG that after watching the video one of his British colleagues said, 'For [expletive] sake, man. You went through a lot of trouble to get him to say nothing,'" Durham continued. "At a later point in time, after the Mueller Special
    Counsel team was in place, UK ALAT-1 said that 'the Brits finally had enough,' and in response to a request for some assistance '[a British Intelligence Service-I person] basically said there was no [expletive] way in hell they were going to do it.'"

    That's our number 1 ally and partner in the five eyes group telling our DOJ....No FUCKING WAY IN HELL were they going to assist the Mueller team.

    I don't recall that. It's kind of memorable.

    ScottW

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mINE109@21:1/5 to ScottW on Fri May 19 09:40:09 2023
    On 5/18/23 9:55 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Thursday, May 18, 2023 at 1:20:55 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 5/18/23 12:26 PM, ScottW wrote:
    gouge your eyes out with a red hot poker before reading.

    https://justthenews.com/government/federal-agencies/holdtop-10-takeaways-durham-report


    Anything in there not already in the Senate Report or the IG findings?

    I don't know.

    Get back to me.

    Did they note that British Intel wanted nothing to do with crossfire hurricane?

    Wouldn't that be in the Mueller Report?

    United Kingdom intelligence service officials were unwilling to aid
    in the investigation, contending that it was devoid of predicating
    evidence.

    Durham says there was predicating evidence so that's an odd thing to
    point to.

    "Later in the Fall of 2016, UK ALAT-1 was at FBI Headquarters with
    some of his British Intelligence Service-I counterparts," Durham
    notes, referencing a UK intelligence official. "While there, members
    of the Crossfire Hurricane team played the audio/visual recordings of
    CHS-1 's August 20, 2016 meeting with Carter Page. UK ALAT-1 said the
    effect on the British Intelligence Service-I personnel was not
    positive because of the lack of any evidence corning out of the conversation." "UK ALAT-1 told the OIG that after watching the video
    one of his British colleagues said, 'For [expletive] sake, man. You
    went through a lot of trouble to get him to say nothing,'" Durham
    continued. "At a later point in time, after the Mueller Special
    Counsel team was in place, UK ALAT-1 said that 'the Brits finally had enough,' and in response to a request for some assistance '[a British Intelligence Service-I person] basically said there was no
    [expletive] way in hell they were going to do it.'"

    That's our number 1 ally and partner in the five eyes group telling
    our DOJ....No FUCKING WAY IN HELL were they going to assist the
    Mueller team.

    I don't recall that. It's kind of memorable.

    Sounds like an opinion of that interview, not the investigation.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ScottW@21:1/5 to All on Fri May 19 16:10:00 2023
    On Friday, May 19, 2023 at 7:40:15 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 5/18/23 9:55 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Thursday, May 18, 2023 at 1:20:55 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 5/18/23 12:26 PM, ScottW wrote:
    gouge your eyes out with a red hot poker before reading.

    https://justthenews.com/government/federal-agencies/holdtop-10-takeaways-durham-report


    Anything in there not already in the Senate Report or the IG findings?

    I don't know.
    Get back to me.
    Did they note that British Intel wanted nothing to do with crossfire hurricane?
    Wouldn't that be in the Mueller Report?

    Since it's pretty embarrassing to the Mueller team...I kind of doubt it.

    But get back to me on that.

    United Kingdom intelligence service officials were unwilling to aid
    in the investigation, contending that it was devoid of predicating evidence.
    Durham says there was predicating evidence so that's an odd thing to
    point to.

    LoL....no, he said at that point they all knew the predication was fabricated BS.
    But they lingered on to sway an election and impede the Trump agenda.

    You're becoming as delusionally stupid as Trevor.

    ScottW

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mINE109@21:1/5 to ScottW on Sat May 20 10:15:48 2023
    On 5/19/23 6:10 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Friday, May 19, 2023 at 7:40:15 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 5/18/23 9:55 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Thursday, May 18, 2023 at 1:20:55 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 5/18/23 12:26 PM, ScottW wrote:
    gouge your eyes out with a red hot poker before reading.

    https://justthenews.com/government/federal-agencies/holdtop-10-takeaways-durham-report

    Anything in there not already in the Senate Report or the IG findings?

    I don't know.
    Get back to me.
    Did they note that British Intel wanted nothing to do with crossfire
    hurricane?
    Wouldn't that be in the Mueller Report?

    Since it's pretty embarrassing to the Mueller team...I kind of doubt it.

    I don't think the Mueller team would give a flip about some Brits.
    Durham chose to quote it for the entertainment value.
    But get back to me on that.

    In your quote it says, "UK ALAT-1 told the OIG." so this isn't new. In addition, Durham omits to mention his and Barr's European goose chases
    based on the Papadopoulos testimony.

    United Kingdom intelligence service officials were unwilling to aid
    in the investigation, contending that it was devoid of predicating
    evidence.
    Durham says there was predicating evidence so that's an odd thing to
    point to.

    LoL....no, he said at that point they all knew the predication was fabricated BS.

    Then why does he say it called for a preliminary investigation?

    But they lingered on to sway an election and impede the Trump agenda.

    Trump won that election and there's now more evidence FBI included MAGA.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ScottW@21:1/5 to All on Sat May 20 20:44:33 2023
    On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 8:15:51 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 5/19/23 6:10 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Friday, May 19, 2023 at 7:40:15 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 5/18/23 9:55 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Thursday, May 18, 2023 at 1:20:55 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 5/18/23 12:26 PM, ScottW wrote:
    gouge your eyes out with a red hot poker before reading.

    https://justthenews.com/government/federal-agencies/holdtop-10-takeaways-durham-report

    Anything in there not already in the Senate Report or the IG findings? >>
    I don't know.
    Get back to me.
    Did they note that British Intel wanted nothing to do with crossfire
    hurricane?
    Wouldn't that be in the Mueller Report?

    Since it's pretty embarrassing to the Mueller team...I kind of doubt it.
    I don't think the Mueller team would give a flip about some Brits.
    Durham chose to quote it for the entertainment value.
    But get back to me on that.
    In your quote it says, "UK ALAT-1 told the OIG." so this isn't new. In addition, Durham omits to mention his and Barr's European goose chases
    based on the Papadopoulos testimony.
    United Kingdom intelligence service officials were unwilling to aid
    in the investigation, contending that it was devoid of predicating
    evidence.
    Durham says there was predicating evidence so that's an odd thing to
    point to.

    LoL....no, he said at that point they all knew the predication was fabricated BS.
    Then why does he say it called for a preliminary investigation?

    Is that what Mueller was doing? GMAFB....stop being a total deuchebag for just one thread.

    ScottW

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Art Sackman@21:1/5 to All on Sat May 20 21:39:25 2023
    I
    GMAFB....stop being a total deuchebag for just one thread.

    It fits Stevie's identity

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mINE109@21:1/5 to ScottW on Sun May 21 07:29:16 2023
    On 5/20/23 10:44 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 8:15:51 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 5/19/23 6:10 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Friday, May 19, 2023 at 7:40:15 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 5/18/23 9:55 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Thursday, May 18, 2023 at 1:20:55 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 5/18/23 12:26 PM, ScottW wrote:
    gouge your eyes out with a red hot poker before reading.

    https://justthenews.com/government/federal-agencies/holdtop-10-takeaways-durham-report

    Anything in there not already in the Senate Report or the IG findings? >>>>
    I don't know.
    Get back to me.
    Did they note that British Intel wanted nothing to do with crossfire >>>>> hurricane?
    Wouldn't that be in the Mueller Report?

    Since it's pretty embarrassing to the Mueller team...I kind of doubt it.
    I don't think the Mueller team would give a flip about some Brits.
    Durham chose to quote it for the entertainment value.
    But get back to me on that.
    In your quote it says, "UK ALAT-1 told the OIG." so this isn't new. In
    addition, Durham omits to mention his and Barr's European goose chases
    based on the Papadopoulos testimony.
    United Kingdom intelligence service officials were unwilling to aid
    in the investigation, contending that it was devoid of predicating
    evidence.
    Durham says there was predicating evidence so that's an odd thing to
    point to.

    LoL....no, he said at that point they all knew the predication was fabricated BS.
    Then why does he say it called for a preliminary investigation?

    Is that what Mueller was doing? GMAFB....stop being a total deuchebag for just one thread.

    That's Durham's conclusion concerning Crossfire Hurricane.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ScottW@21:1/5 to All on Sun May 21 17:31:38 2023
    On Sunday, May 21, 2023 at 5:29:19 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 5/20/23 10:44 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 8:15:51 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 5/19/23 6:10 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Friday, May 19, 2023 at 7:40:15 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 5/18/23 9:55 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Thursday, May 18, 2023 at 1:20:55 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 5/18/23 12:26 PM, ScottW wrote:
    gouge your eyes out with a red hot poker before reading.

    https://justthenews.com/government/federal-agencies/holdtop-10-takeaways-durham-report

    Anything in there not already in the Senate Report or the IG findings?

    I don't know.
    Get back to me.
    Did they note that British Intel wanted nothing to do with crossfire >>>>> hurricane?
    Wouldn't that be in the Mueller Report?

    Since it's pretty embarrassing to the Mueller team...I kind of doubt it. >> I don't think the Mueller team would give a flip about some Brits.
    Durham chose to quote it for the entertainment value.
    But get back to me on that.
    In your quote it says, "UK ALAT-1 told the OIG." so this isn't new. In
    addition, Durham omits to mention his and Barr's European goose chases
    based on the Papadopoulos testimony.
    United Kingdom intelligence service officials were unwilling to aid >>>>> in the investigation, contending that it was devoid of predicating >>>>> evidence.
    Durham says there was predicating evidence so that's an odd thing to >>>> point to.

    LoL....no, he said at that point they all knew the predication was fabricated BS.
    Then why does he say it called for a preliminary investigation?

    Is that what Mueller was doing? GMAFB....stop being a total deuchebag for just one thread.
    That's Durham's conclusion concerning Crossfire Hurricane.

    Yes...it should have never passed the preliminary investigation phase.
    That means no FISA warrants and it sure as hell means no special prosecutor. But we got all of the above.

    ScottW

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mINE109@21:1/5 to ScottW on Mon May 22 07:59:52 2023
    On 5/21/23 7:31 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Sunday, May 21, 2023 at 5:29:19 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 5/20/23 10:44 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 8:15:51 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 5/19/23 6:10 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Friday, May 19, 2023 at 7:40:15 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 5/18/23 9:55 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Thursday, May 18, 2023 at 1:20:55 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote: >>>>>>>> On 5/18/23 12:26 PM, ScottW wrote:
    gouge your eyes out with a red hot poker before reading.

    https://justthenews.com/government/federal-agencies/holdtop-10-takeaways-durham-report

    Anything in there not already in the Senate Report or the IG findings? >>>>>>
    I don't know.
    Get back to me.
    Did they note that British Intel wanted nothing to do with crossfire >>>>>>> hurricane?
    Wouldn't that be in the Mueller Report?

    Since it's pretty embarrassing to the Mueller team...I kind of doubt it. >>>> I don't think the Mueller team would give a flip about some Brits.
    Durham chose to quote it for the entertainment value.
    But get back to me on that.
    In your quote it says, "UK ALAT-1 told the OIG." so this isn't new. In >>>> addition, Durham omits to mention his and Barr's European goose chases >>>> based on the Papadopoulos testimony.
    United Kingdom intelligence service officials were unwilling to aid >>>>>>> in the investigation, contending that it was devoid of predicating >>>>>>> evidence.
    Durham says there was predicating evidence so that's an odd thing to >>>>>> point to.

    LoL....no, he said at that point they all knew the predication was fabricated BS.
    Then why does he say it called for a preliminary investigation?

    Is that what Mueller was doing? GMAFB....stop being a total deuchebag for just one thread.
    That's Durham's conclusion concerning Crossfire Hurricane.

    Yes...it should have never passed the preliminary investigation phase.

    He said a preliminary investigation was warranted.

    That means no FISA warrants and it sure as hell means no special prosecutor. But we got all of the above.

    You're conflating Carter Page with the Papadopoulos. And Mueller was got results, including convictions.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)