1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. REC.AUDIO.OPINION

  • Now it's a coverup

    From ScottW@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jan 20 15:13:34 2023
    New York Times reporters Michael D. Shear, Peter Baker and Katie Rogers detailed Friday how the White House thought they would manage to cover up the ongoing scandal of President Joe Biden’s classified documents.


    Tucker's taking the position that the deep state is taking Joe out before the 2024 election is interesting.

    https://www.foxnews.com/video/6318947449112

    Can't find it but if you can you should see his monologue that preceded this piece....giving a very different perspective on the removal of Nixon from office....and why.

    ScottW

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Art Sackman@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jan 20 15:31:47 2023
    New York Times reporters Michael D. Shear, Peter Baker and Katie Rogers detailed Friday how the White House thought they would
    manage to cover up the ongoing scandal of President Joe Biden’s classified documents.


    Tucker's taking the position that the deep state is taking Joe out before the 2024 election is interesting.

    https://www.foxnews.com/video/6318947449112

    Can't find it but if you can you should see his monologue that preceded this piece....giving a very different perspective on the removal of oNixon from office....and why.

    ScottW

    not sure tus link will work


    https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/20/us/politics/biden-classified-documents.html?name=styln-biden-documents&region=TOP_BANNER&block=storyline_menu_recirc&action=click&pgtype=Article&variant=show&is_new=false

    my take is too many team members knew, and one leaked it


    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ScottW@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Fri Jan 20 15:53:32 2023
    On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 3:31:49 PM UTC-8, [email protected] wrote:
    New York Times reporters Michael D. Shear, Peter Baker and Katie Rogers detailed Friday how the White House thought they would
    manage to cover up the ongoing scandal of President Joe Biden’s classified documents.


    Tucker's taking the position that the deep state is taking Joe out before the 2024 election is interesting.

    https://www.foxnews.com/video/6318947449112

    Can't find it but if you can you should see his monologue that preceded this piece....giving a very different perspective on the removal of oNixon from office....and why.

    ScottW

    not sure tus link will work


    https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/20/us/politics/biden-classified-documents.html?name=styln-biden-documents&region=TOP_BANNER&block=storyline_menu_recirc&action=click&pgtype=Article&variant=show&is_new=false

    my take is too many team members knew, and one leaked it

    The question is why. And why CBS ran it rather than bury it?
    And why the WH Press corp. is no longer buying KJP's lines of BS.

    Joe will be crying, "Why isn't the media kissing my ass?
    I'm a Biden for crying out loud."

    It's gotten so bad CNN is running clips of one of his brothers pushing his private charter schools and promising the school board he can deliver federal dollars
    if they support him.
    Their gov't ethics pundit called it "outrageous".

    It's like a light came on and all the roaches are caught exposed.

    ScottW

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mINE109@21:1/5 to ScottW on Fri Jan 20 18:41:50 2023
    On 1/20/23 5:13 PM, ScottW wrote:

    https://www.foxnews.com/video/6318947449112

    Can't find it but if you can you should see his monologue that
    preceded this piece....giving a very different perspective on the
    removal of Nixon from office....and why.

    There's a page devoted to his transcripts. Let's take a look...

    He's wrong about Biden's tax returns...Saying Sheila Jackson Lee is
    "shrieking" is misogynistic and/or racist...No, Hunter isn't subsidizing
    Joe and Trump didn't "have the goods" on the President.

    Didn't see it, but I imagine it's as nuts as the rest of his output. Oh,
    well, this is why mediamatters exists:

    https://www.mediamatters.org/tucker-carlson/tucker-carlson-claims-richard-nixon-was-removed-questioning-deep-state

    Responded with silence? Perhaps not to provoke a volatile and
    alcohol-fueled superior. Nixon was removed for his crimes against
    democracy. It would take a deep state to keep him in office.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ScottW@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jan 20 22:57:56 2023
    On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 4:41:53 PM UTC-8, MINe109 wrote:
    On 1/20/23 5:13 PM, ScottW wrote:

    https://www.foxnews.com/video/6318947449112

    Can't find it but if you can you should see his monologue that
    preceded this piece....giving a very different perspective on the
    removal of Nixon from office....and why.
    There's a page devoted to his transcripts. Let's take a look...

    He's wrong about Biden's tax returns...Saying Sheila Jackson Lee is "shrieking" is misogynistic and/or racist...No, Hunter isn't subsidizing
    Joe and Trump didn't "have the goods" on the President.

    Didn't see it, but I imagine it's as nuts as the rest of his output. Oh, well, this is why mediamatters exists:

    https://www.mediamatters.org/tucker-carlson/tucker-carlson-claims-richard-nixon-was-removed-questioning-deep-state

    Responded with silence? Perhaps not to provoke a volatile and
    alcohol-fueled superior. Nixon was removed for his crimes against
    democracy. It would take a deep state to keep him in office.

    I guess you missed the part about his record reelection margin.
    Then again...you miss a lot.

    ScottW

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mINE109@21:1/5 to ScottW on Sat Jan 21 09:31:07 2023
    On 1/21/23 12:57 AM, ScottW wrote:
    On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 4:41:53 PM UTC-8, MINe109 wrote:

    https://www.mediamatters.org/tucker-carlson/tucker-carlson-claims-richard-nixon-was-removed-questioning-deep-state

    Responded with silence? Perhaps not to provoke a volatile and
    alcohol-fueled superior. Nixon was removed for his crimes against
    democracy. It would take a deep state to keep him in office.

    I guess you missed the part about his record reelection margin.

    Things went downhill after that.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)