On 11/15/22 11:54 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Tuesday, November 15, 2022 at 11:04:59 AM UTC-8, MINe109 wrote:
On 11/15/22 10:02 AM, ScottW wrote:
https://redstate.com/jenvanlaar/2022/11/15/auto-draft-61-n659144
It's all about Ca. Totally dem run.
And lacking any ballot security whatsoever.
Voter must sign the ballot envelope.
Someone must sign it. But FYI...
The law presumes that the signature is valid and does not require an
exact match; it says that “similar characteristics” should match to determine if a signature is valid.
Yes, because valid signatures can vary for many reasons, including age,
health, etc.
and still... 49,816 were not accepted because of nonmatching
signatures.
System works!
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2021/02/16/fact-check-california-requires-mail-ballot-signature-verification/6770483002/
Getting your news from Kevin Sorbo?
Would you consider this proof of attempt voter fraud?
https://www.calvoter.org/content/report-finds-17-percent-california-vote-mail-ballots-rejected-average
Apparently the youngs aren't used to signing signatures. Fraud isn't
even mentioned as a probable cause for rejection.
Of course, rejection as such is not enough evidence to be "proof."
https://www.sos.ca.gov/administration/news-releases-and-advisories/2021-news-releases-and-advisories/js21001
https://files.constantcontact.com/c1d64240601/e55c2824-dee7-419f-b6a8-b4f6e8490f1b.pdf
Bad handwriting is more probable than widespread and ignored voter fraud.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/is-cursive-writing-dead/
Think of it as an inverse of those high frequency tones kids use because
adults can't hear them but for writing stuff kids can't read.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)