Over The Hedge: Watson, the Lame-O IBM Supercomputer Comedian
https://www.gocomics.com/overthehedge/2021/11/18
I am beginning to think that he is not going to run in 2024.
On Thu, 18 Nov 2021 13:31:54 -0600, Lynn McGuire
<[email protected]> wrote:
Over The Hedge: Watson, the Lame-O IBM Supercomputer Comedian
https://www.gocomics.com/overthehedge/2021/11/18
I am beginning to think that he is not going to run in 2024.
Sadly, I have not seen anything to suggest that.
Well, unless he convinces himself that, having actually won in 2020,
he has had his two terms.
I wonder if he realizes that his lawyers, in disputing Biden's
decision to not allow him to claim Executive Privilege on a set of
documents /admitted/ that Trump was the /former/ President, and Biden
the /current/ President.
I suspect not, as, if he did, he would no doubt fire them. Publicly.
In article <[email protected]>,
Paul S Person <[email protected]d> wrote:
On Thu, 18 Nov 2021 13:31:54 -0600, Lynn McGuire
<[email protected]> wrote:
Over The Hedge: Watson, the Lame-O IBM Supercomputer Comedian
https://www.gocomics.com/overthehedge/2021/11/18
I am beginning to think that he is not going to run in 2024.
Sadly, I have not seen anything to suggest that.
Well, unless he convinces himself that, having actually won in 2020,
he has had his two terms.
I wonder if he realizes that his lawyers, in disputing Biden's
decision to not allow him to claim Executive Privilege on a set of
documents /admitted/ that Trump was the /former/ President, and Biden
the /current/ President.
I suspect not, as, if he did, he would no doubt fire them. Publicly.
Hope on, hope ever: maybe within two years he'll be a
long-term guest of a different branch of the Federal Government.
Or maybe he'll just ugly himself to death.
On 11/19/2021 2:11 PM, Dorothy J Heydt wrote:
In article <[email protected]>,
Paul S Person <[email protected]d> wrote:
On Thu, 18 Nov 2021 13:31:54 -0600, Lynn McGuire
<[email protected]> wrote:
Over The Hedge: Watson, the Lame-O IBM Supercomputer Comedian
https://www.gocomics.com/overthehedge/2021/11/18
I am beginning to think that he is not going to run in 2024.
Sadly, I have not seen anything to suggest that.
Well, unless he convinces himself that, having actually won in 2020,
he has had his two terms.
I wonder if he realizes that his lawyers, in disputing Biden's
decision to not allow him to claim Executive Privilege on a set of
documents /admitted/ that Trump was the /former/ President, and Biden
the /current/ President.
I suspect not, as, if he did, he would no doubt fire them. Publicly.
Hope on, hope ever: maybe within two years he'll be a
long-term guest of a different branch of the Federal Government.
Or maybe he'll just ugly himself to death.
Putting former presidents in jail for political crimes is a very bad
habit to start. Most people label that country a banana republic then.
Lynn McGuire <[email protected]> writes:
On 11/19/2021 2:11 PM, Dorothy J Heydt wrote:
In article <[email protected]>,
Paul S Person <[email protected]d> wrote:
On Thu, 18 Nov 2021 13:31:54 -0600, Lynn McGuire
<[email protected]> wrote:
Over The Hedge: Watson, the Lame-O IBM Supercomputer Comedian
https://www.gocomics.com/overthehedge/2021/11/18
I am beginning to think that he is not going to run in 2024.
Sadly, I have not seen anything to suggest that.
Well, unless he convinces himself that, having actually won in 2020,
he has had his two terms.
I wonder if he realizes that his lawyers, in disputing Biden's
decision to not allow him to claim Executive Privilege on a set of
documents /admitted/ that Trump was the /former/ President, and Biden
the /current/ President.
I suspect not, as, if he did, he would no doubt fire them. Publicly.
Hope on, hope ever: maybe within two years he'll be a
long-term guest of a different branch of the Federal Government.
Or maybe he'll just ugly himself to death.
Putting former presidents in jail for political crimes is a very bad
habit to start. Most people label that country a banana republic then.
Not putting former presidents in jail for criminal crimes is a very
bad precedent. Nobody is above the law. Insurrection is not a political crime, it's a criminal act.
On 2021-11-23 6:34 a.m., Scott Lurndal wrote:
Lynn McGuire <[email protected]> writes:
On 11/19/2021 2:11 PM, Dorothy J Heydt wrote:
In article <[email protected]>,
Paul S Person <[email protected]d> wrote:
On Thu, 18 Nov 2021 13:31:54 -0600, Lynn McGuire
<[email protected]> wrote:
Over The Hedge: Watson, the Lame-O IBM Supercomputer Comedian
https://www.gocomics.com/overthehedge/2021/11/18
I am beginning to think that he is not going to run in 2024.
Sadly, I have not seen anything to suggest that.
Well, unless he convinces himself that, having actually won in 2020, >>>>> he has had his two terms.
I wonder if he realizes that his lawyers, in disputing Biden's
decision to not allow him to claim Executive Privilege on a set of
documents /admitted/ that Trump was the /former/ President, and Biden >>>>> the /current/ President.
I suspect not, as, if he did, he would no doubt fire them. Publicly.
Hope on, hope ever: maybe within two years he'll be a
long-term guest of a different branch of the Federal Government.
Or maybe he'll just ugly himself to death.
Putting former presidents in jail for political crimes is a very bad
habit to start. Most people label that country a banana republic then.
Not putting former presidents in jail for criminal crimes is a very
bad precedent. Nobody is above the law. Insurrection is not a political >> crime, it's a criminal act.
The Trumpists really want to ignore that bit.
There was an election and they lost...
...then some of them tried to overturn that election with violence and
the threat of violence.
Now that that plan has failed they want to claim it was just a
"political" crime.
On Tue, 23 Nov 2021 09:00:18 -0800, Alan <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2021-11-23 6:34 a.m., Scott Lurndal wrote:
Lynn McGuire <[email protected]> writes:The Trumpists really want to ignore that bit.
On 11/19/2021 2:11 PM, Dorothy J Heydt wrote:
In article <[email protected]>,
Paul S Person <[email protected]d> wrote:
On Thu, 18 Nov 2021 13:31:54 -0600, Lynn McGuire
<[email protected]> wrote:
Over The Hedge: Watson, the Lame-O IBM Supercomputer Comedian
https://www.gocomics.com/overthehedge/2021/11/18
I am beginning to think that he is not going to run in 2024.
Sadly, I have not seen anything to suggest that.
Well, unless he convinces himself that, having actually won in
2020, he has had his two terms.
I wonder if he realizes that his lawyers, in disputing Biden's
decision to not allow him to claim Executive Privilege on a set of >>>>>> documents /admitted/ that Trump was the /former/ President, and
Biden the /current/ President.
I suspect not, as, if he did, he would no doubt fire them.
Publicly.
Hope on, hope ever: maybe within two years he'll be a long-term
guest of a different branch of the Federal Government.
Or maybe he'll just ugly himself to death.
Putting former presidents in jail for political crimes is a very bad
habit to start. Most people label that country a banana republic
then.
Not putting former presidents in jail for criminal crimes is a very
bad precedent. Nobody is above the law. Insurrection is not a
political crime, it's a criminal act.
There was an election and they lost...
...then some of them tried to overturn that election with violence and
the threat of violence.
Now that that plan has failed they want to claim it was just a
"political" crime.
Some of them seem to actually believe that claiming something is
"political" some how makes it A-OK (if they do it) and Utterly Evil (if anyone else does it).
The question here is, /when/ does something that could be political slip
over into something people can be held accountable for?
And I don't mean at the ballot box. I mean in court, civil or criminal,
or both.
On Wed, 24 Nov 2021 08:48:10 -0800, Paul S Person wrote:
On Tue, 23 Nov 2021 09:00:18 -0800, Alan <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2021-11-23 6:34 a.m., Scott Lurndal wrote:
Lynn McGuire <[email protected]> writes:The Trumpists really want to ignore that bit.
On 11/19/2021 2:11 PM, Dorothy J Heydt wrote:
In article <[email protected]>,
Paul S Person <[email protected]d> wrote:
On Thu, 18 Nov 2021 13:31:54 -0600, Lynn McGuire
<[email protected]> wrote:
Over The Hedge: Watson, the Lame-O IBM Supercomputer Comedian
https://www.gocomics.com/overthehedge/2021/11/18
I am beginning to think that he is not going to run in 2024.
Sadly, I have not seen anything to suggest that.
Well, unless he convinces himself that, having actually won in
2020, he has had his two terms.
I wonder if he realizes that his lawyers, in disputing Biden's
decision to not allow him to claim Executive Privilege on a set of >>>>>>> documents /admitted/ that Trump was the /former/ President, and
Biden the /current/ President.
I suspect not, as, if he did, he would no doubt fire them.
Publicly.
Hope on, hope ever: maybe within two years he'll be a long-term
guest of a different branch of the Federal Government.
Or maybe he'll just ugly himself to death.
Putting former presidents in jail for political crimes is a very bad >>>>> habit to start. Most people label that country a banana republic
then.
Not putting former presidents in jail for criminal crimes is a very
bad precedent. Nobody is above the law. Insurrection is not a
political crime, it's a criminal act.
There was an election and they lost...
...then some of them tried to overturn that election with violence and >>>the threat of violence.
Now that that plan has failed they want to claim it was just a >>>"political" crime.
Some of them seem to actually believe that claiming something is
"political" some how makes it A-OK (if they do it) and Utterly Evil (if
anyone else does it).
The question here is, /when/ does something that could be political slip
over into something people can be held accountable for?
And I don't mean at the ballot box. I mean in court, civil or criminal,
or both.
Well if you look at the number of peaceful protesters and Union
soldiers(at least they seem to think they are with the attacks on any
hint of the Confederacy) who walked away from felonies it all comes down
to which party controls the DA, law be damn.
On Wed, 24 Nov 2021 08:48:10 -0800, Paul S Person wrote:
Some of them seem to actually believe that claiming something is
"political" some how makes it A-OK (if they do it) and Utterly Evil (if
anyone else does it).
The question here is, /when/ does something that could be political slip
over into something people can be held accountable for?
And I don't mean at the ballot box. I mean in court, civil or criminal,
or both.
Well if you look at the number of peaceful protesters and Union
soldiers(at least they seem to think they are with the attacks on any
hint of the Confederacy) who walked away from felonies it all comes down
to which party controls the DA, law be damn.
On Wed, 24 Nov 2021 20:13:20 -0000 (UTC), Magewolf
<[email protected]> wrote:
On Wed, 24 Nov 2021 08:48:10 -0800, Paul S Person wrote:
Some of them seem to actually believe that claiming something is
"political" some how makes it A-OK (if they do it) and Utterly Evil (if
anyone else does it).
The question here is, /when/ does something that could be political slip >>> over into something people can be held accountable for?
And I don't mean at the ballot box. I mean in court, civil or criminal,
or both.
Well if you look at the number of peaceful protesters and Union
soldiers(at least they seem to think they are with the attacks on any
hint of the Confederacy) who walked away from felonies it all comes down
to which party controls the DA, law be damn.
Seems like the people who fought in a war generally have a better
attitude toward the other side than do their descendants.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 714 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 137:15:36 |
| Calls: | 12,087 |
| Files: | 14,997 |
| Messages: | 6,517,386 |