• Re: Noel Clarke not cleared

    From The Doctor@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Fri Aug 22 11:07:10 2025
    In article <1089e3u$1ftu1$[email protected]>,
    solar penguin <[email protected]> wrote:
    Noel Clarke (who played Mickey) has lost his sexual-harassment libel
    case against The Guardian newspaper.

    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/noel-clarke-loses-guardian-libel-case-b2812335.html


    not good news for Noel .

    --
    solar penguin


    --
    Member - Liberal International This is [email protected] Ici [email protected]
    Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
    All I want to hear from JEsus Christ is WEll done Good and Faithful servant

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Doctor@21:1/5 to Blueshirt on Fri Aug 22 11:43:15 2025
    In article <[email protected]>,
    Blueshirt <[email protected]> wrote:
    solar penguin wrote:

    Noel Clarke (who played Mickey) has lost his sexual-harassment
    libel case against The Guardian newspaper.

    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/noel-clarke-loses-guardian-libel-case-b2812335.html

    It's not like we will be seeing the tin dog in Doctor Who
    again anyway... the BBC wouldn't want the negative publicity.
    It's only really about Noel Clarke's reputation in the business
    now.

    And that is looking sullied.
    --
    Member - Liberal International This is [email protected] Ici [email protected]
    Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
    All I want to hear from JEsus Christ is WEll done Good and Faithful servant

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Blueshirt@21:1/5 to solar penguin on Fri Aug 22 12:18:55 2025
    solar penguin wrote:

    Noel Clarke (who played Mickey) has lost his sexual-harassment
    libel case against The Guardian newspaper.


    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/noel-clarke-loses-guardian-libel-case-b2812335.html

    It's not like we will be seeing the tin dog in Doctor Who
    again anyway... the BBC wouldn't want the negative publicity.
    It's only really about Noel Clarke's reputation in the business
    now.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Blueshirt@21:1/5 to solar penguin on Fri Aug 22 12:47:01 2025
    solar penguin wrote:


    Binky bleated:

    In article <1089e3u$1ftu1$[email protected]>,
    solar penguin <[email protected]> wrote:
    Noel Clarke (who played Mickey) has lost his
    sexual-harassment libel case against The
    Guardian newspaper.


    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/noel-clarke-loses-guardian-libel-case-b2812335.html

    not good news for Noel .

    True.

    And he’s a really talented actor. Shame he had to throw it all
    away like this.

    He was badly advised to sue a national newspaper when there were
    so many different women prepared to come forward and testify in
    court against him... these cases do attract bandwagon jumpers
    but it's highly unlikely twenty women were all making up or
    exaggerating stories against him... and the theory it was all
    done to stop him getting a BAFTA seems a bit delusional...

    As far as Doctor Who goes Mickey Smith, like Captain Jack, is
    part of the show's history, not its future.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Doctor@21:1/5 to Blueshirt on Fri Aug 22 12:10:58 2025
    In article <[email protected]>,
    Blueshirt <[email protected]> wrote:
    solar penguin wrote:


    Binky bleated:

    In article <1089e3u$1ftu1$[email protected]>,
    solar penguin <[email protected]> wrote:
    Noel Clarke (who played Mickey) has lost his
    sexual-harassment libel case against The
    Guardian newspaper.

    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/noel-clarke-loses-guardian-libel-case-b2812335.html

    not good news for Noel .

    True.

    And he’s a really talented actor. Shame he had to throw it all
    away like this.

    He was badly advised to sue a national newspaper when there were
    so many different women prepared to come forward and testify in
    court against him... these cases do attract bandwagon jumpers
    but it's highly unlikely twenty women were all making up or
    exaggerating stories against him... and the theory it was all
    done to stop him getting a BAFTA seems a bit delusional...

    As far as Doctor Who goes Mickey Smith, like Captain Jack, is
    part of the show's history, not its future.


    Sad but true.
    --
    Member - Liberal International This is [email protected] Ici [email protected]
    Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
    All I want to hear from JEsus Christ is WEll done Good and Faithful servant

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The True Doctor@21:1/5 to solar penguin on Fri Aug 22 14:33:06 2025
    On 22/08/2025 10:43, solar penguin wrote:
    Noel Clarke (who played Mickey) has lost his sexual-harassment libel
    case against The Guardian newspaper.

    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/noel-clarke-loses-guardian-libel-case-b2812335.html


    He shouldn't have tried to use the excuse of people conspiring to bring
    him down after he was given a BAFTA membership as a defence for exposing himself to women, and he should have opted for a jury trial.

    --
    The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw

    "To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
    stands for." --William Shatner

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Your Name@21:1/5 to Melissa Hollingsworth on Sat Aug 23 10:16:26 2025
    On 2025-08-22 13:39:57 +0000, Melissa Hollingsworth said:
    Verily, in article <1089j0u$iab$[email protected]>, did [email protected] deliver unto us this message:

    In article <1089e3u$1ftu1$[email protected]>,
    solar penguin <[email protected]> wrote:
    Noel Clarke (who played Mickey) has lost his sexual-harassment libel
    case against The Guardian newspaper.

    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/noel-clarke-loses-guardian-libel-case-b2812335.html


    not good news for Noel .

    The article says that he claimed there was a conspiracy of people
    conspiring to lie because they couldn't stand to see him get a BAFTA.

    The judge had difficulty believing that 20+ people with no relation to
    each other were conspiring against poor Noel. Yes, I also have trouble believing that.

    Last night I watched "Sexual Healing," a South Park episode about
    celebrity sex scandals. They make some good points, most notably that
    men have always done this when given power,

    It's not just men. For example, in yesterday's newspaper there was an
    article about a female teacher who has been convicted of sex offences
    against her 15 year old student.



    so what do we expect exactly? That's true, but it doesn't excuse people
    like Clarke being aggressive at the uninterested.

    Some stories are true. Some stories are bandwagon jumpers. Some stories
    are gold-diggers trying to get money out of someone rich. Some stories
    are morons trying to get their names in the paper / publicity. Some
    stories are groupies who got what they were hoping for, and then
    changed their minds afterwards. etc., etc.

    None of it is news nor worth reporting in the news media in the over-sensationalised way they do.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Hornplayer9599@21:1/5 to Melissa Hollingsworth on Fri Aug 22 19:19:25 2025
    On 8/22/2025 18:10, Melissa Hollingsworth wrote:
    Verily, in article <108aq7p$1qs28$[email protected]>, did
    [email protected] deliver unto us this message:

    On 2025-08-22 13:39:57 +0000, Melissa Hollingsworth said:
    Verily, in article <1089j0u$iab$[email protected]>, did
    [email protected] deliver unto us this message:

    In article <1089e3u$1ftu1$[email protected]>,
    solar penguin <[email protected]> wrote:
    Noel Clarke (who played Mickey) has lost his sexual-harassment libel >>>>> case against The Guardian newspaper.

    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/noel-clarke-loses-guardian-libel-case-b2812335.html


    not good news for Noel .

    The article says that he claimed there was a conspiracy of people
    conspiring to lie because they couldn't stand to see him get a BAFTA.

    The judge had difficulty believing that 20+ people with no relation to
    each other were conspiring against poor Noel. Yes, I also have trouble
    believing that.

    Last night I watched "Sexual Healing," a South Park episode about
    celebrity sex scandals. They make some good points, most notably that
    men have always done this when given power,

    It's not just men.

    True. Men seem more prone, but on the other hand, it's only recently
    that women have had any real amount of power.


    None of it is news nor worth reporting in the news media in the
    over-sensationalised way they do.

    Interesting take, but if people want to hear about it, reporters will
    report on it. They live and die on clicks.




    Yes...it reinforces the adage, "If it bleeds...it leads".

    --

    Intelligence is no guarantee against being dead wrong.
    --Carl Sagan

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Doctor@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Sat Aug 23 02:27:50 2025
    In article <108aq7p$1qs28$[email protected]>,
    Your Name <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 2025-08-22 13:39:57 +0000, Melissa Hollingsworth said:
    Verily, in article <1089j0u$iab$[email protected]>, did
    [email protected] deliver unto us this message:

    In article <1089e3u$1ftu1$[email protected]>,
    solar penguin <[email protected]> wrote:
    Noel Clarke (who played Mickey) has lost his sexual-harassment libel
    case against The Guardian newspaper.

    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/noel-clarke-loses-guardian-libel-case-b2812335.html


    not good news for Noel .

    The article says that he claimed there was a conspiracy of people
    conspiring to lie because they couldn't stand to see him get a BAFTA.

    The judge had difficulty believing that 20+ people with no relation to
    each other were conspiring against poor Noel. Yes, I also have trouble
    believing that.

    Last night I watched "Sexual Healing," a South Park episode about
    celebrity sex scandals. They make some good points, most notably that
    men have always done this when given power,

    It's not just men. For example, in yesterday's newspaper there was an
    article about a female teacher who has been convicted of sex offences
    against her 15 year old student.



    so what do we expect exactly? That's true, but it doesn't excuse people
    like Clarke being aggressive at the uninterested.

    Some stories are true. Some stories are bandwagon jumpers. Some stories
    are gold-diggers trying to get money out of someone rich. Some stories
    are morons trying to get their names in the paper / publicity. Some
    stories are groupies who got what they were hoping for, and then
    changed their minds afterwards. etc., etc.

    None of it is news nor worth reporting in the news media in the >over-sensationalised way they do.



    Sick!
    --
    Member - Liberal International This is [email protected] Ici [email protected]
    Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
    All I want to hear from JEsus Christ is WEll done Good and Faithful servant

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Doctor@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Sat Aug 23 02:30:13 2025
    In article <[email protected]>,
    Melissa Hollingsworth <[email protected]> wrote:
    Verily, in article <108aq7p$1qs28$[email protected]>, did
    [email protected] deliver unto us this message:

    On 2025-08-22 13:39:57 +0000, Melissa Hollingsworth said:
    Verily, in article <1089j0u$iab$[email protected]>, did
    [email protected] deliver unto us this message:

    In article <1089e3u$1ftu1$[email protected]>,
    solar penguin <[email protected]> wrote:
    Noel Clarke (who played Mickey) has lost his sexual-harassment libel
    case against The Guardian newspaper.

    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/noel-clarke-loses-guardian-libel-case-b2812335.html


    not good news for Noel .

    The article says that he claimed there was a conspiracy of people
    conspiring to lie because they couldn't stand to see him get a BAFTA.

    The judge had difficulty believing that 20+ people with no relation to
    each other were conspiring against poor Noel. Yes, I also have trouble
    believing that.

    Last night I watched "Sexual Healing," a South Park episode about
    celebrity sex scandals. They make some good points, most notably that
    men have always done this when given power,

    It's not just men.

    True. Men seem more prone, but on the other hand, it's only recently
    that women have had any real amount of power.


    None of it is news nor worth reporting in the news media in the
    over-sensationalised way they do.

    Interesting take, but if people want to hear about it, reporters will
    report on it. They live and die on clicks.


    And then there are militants.


    --
    A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always
    depend on the support of Paul.
    --George Bernard Shaw


    --
    Member - Liberal International This is [email protected] Ici [email protected]
    Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
    All I want to hear from JEsus Christ is WEll done Good and Faithful servant

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Doctor@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Sat Aug 23 02:31:33 2025
    In article <hO7qQ.8237$[email protected]>,
    Hornplayer9599 <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 8/22/2025 18:10, Melissa Hollingsworth wrote:
    Verily, in article <108aq7p$1qs28$[email protected]>, did
    [email protected] deliver unto us this message:

    On 2025-08-22 13:39:57 +0000, Melissa Hollingsworth said:
    Verily, in article <1089j0u$iab$[email protected]>, did
    [email protected] deliver unto us this message:

    In article <1089e3u$1ftu1$[email protected]>,
    solar penguin <[email protected]> wrote:
    Noel Clarke (who played Mickey) has lost his sexual-harassment libel >>>>>> case against The Guardian newspaper.

    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/noel-clarke-loses-guardian-libel-case-b2812335.html


    not good news for Noel .

    The article says that he claimed there was a conspiracy of people
    conspiring to lie because they couldn't stand to see him get a BAFTA.

    The judge had difficulty believing that 20+ people with no relation to >>>> each other were conspiring against poor Noel. Yes, I also have trouble >>>> believing that.

    Last night I watched "Sexual Healing," a South Park episode about
    celebrity sex scandals. They make some good points, most notably that
    men have always done this when given power,

    It's not just men.

    True. Men seem more prone, but on the other hand, it's only recently
    that women have had any real amount of power.


    None of it is news nor worth reporting in the news media in the
    over-sensationalised way they do.

    Interesting take, but if people want to hear about it, reporters will
    report on it. They live and die on clicks.




    Yes...it reinforces the adage, "If it bleeds...it leads".

    --

    Intelligence is no guarantee against being dead wrong.
    --Carl Sagan

    Suck!
    --
    Member - Liberal International This is [email protected] Ici [email protected]
    Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
    All I want to hear from JEsus Christ is WEll done Good and Faithful servant

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Your Name@21:1/5 to Melissa Hollingsworth on Sat Aug 23 14:36:54 2025
    On 2025-08-22 23:10:54 +0000, Melissa Hollingsworth said:
    Verily, in article <108aq7p$1qs28$[email protected]>, did
    [email protected] deliver unto us this message:
    On 2025-08-22 13:39:57 +0000, Melissa Hollingsworth said:
    Verily, in article <1089j0u$iab$[email protected]>, did
    [email protected] deliver unto us this message:
    In article <1089e3u$1ftu1$[email protected]>,
    solar penguin <[email protected]> wrote:
    Noel Clarke (who played Mickey) has lost his sexual-harassment libel >>>>> case against The Guardian newspaper.

    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/noel-clarke-loses-guardian-libel-case-b2812335.html


    not good news for Noel .

    The article says that he claimed there was a conspiracy of people
    conspiring to lie because they couldn't stand to see him get a BAFTA.

    The judge had difficulty believing that 20+ people with no relation to
    each other were conspiring against poor Noel. Yes, I also have trouble
    believing that.

    Last night I watched "Sexual Healing," a South Park episode about
    celebrity sex scandals. They make some good points, most notably that
    men have always done this when given power,

    It's not just men.

    True. Men seem more prone, but on the other hand, it's only recently
    that women have had any real amount of power.

    Sort of. Women have always had power to some degree. In some places it
    is women who have been the leaders.



    None of it is news nor worth reporting in the news media in the
    over-sensationalised way they do.

    Interesting take, but if people want to hear about it, reporters will
    report on it. They live and die on clicks.

    For some people (not just these types of cases), it is noteriety that
    they want, so reporting, especially in over-sensationistic style, is
    exactly what they want. Such scum shouldn't get publicity, nor be
    allowed ot publish books about their "experience". They should simply
    be jailed and forgotten about.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Doctor@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Sat Aug 23 11:47:44 2025
    In article <108b9g5$1u3s2$[email protected]>,
    Your Name <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 2025-08-22 23:10:54 +0000, Melissa Hollingsworth said:
    Verily, in article <108aq7p$1qs28$[email protected]>, did
    [email protected] deliver unto us this message:
    On 2025-08-22 13:39:57 +0000, Melissa Hollingsworth said:
    Verily, in article <1089j0u$iab$[email protected]>, did
    [email protected] deliver unto us this message:
    In article <1089e3u$1ftu1$[email protected]>,
    solar penguin <[email protected]> wrote:
    Noel Clarke (who played Mickey) has lost his sexual-harassment libel >>>>>> case against The Guardian newspaper.

    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/noel-clarke-loses-guardian-libel-case-b2812335.html


    not good news for Noel .

    The article says that he claimed there was a conspiracy of people
    conspiring to lie because they couldn't stand to see him get a BAFTA.

    The judge had difficulty believing that 20+ people with no relation to >>>> each other were conspiring against poor Noel. Yes, I also have trouble >>>> believing that.

    Last night I watched "Sexual Healing," a South Park episode about
    celebrity sex scandals. They make some good points, most notably that
    men have always done this when given power,

    It's not just men.

    True. Men seem more prone, but on the other hand, it's only recently
    that women have had any real amount of power.

    Sort of. Women have always had power to some degree. In some places it
    is women who have been the leaders.



    None of it is news nor worth reporting in the news media in the
    over-sensationalised way they do.

    Interesting take, but if people want to hear about it, reporters will
    report on it. They live and die on clicks.

    For some people (not just these types of cases), it is noteriety that
    they want, so reporting, especially in over-sensationistic style, is
    exactly what they want. Such scum shouldn't get publicity, nor be
    allowed ot publish books about their "experience". They should simply
    be jailed and forgotten about.



    Similar to Stalin and Dawkins.
    --
    Member - Liberal International This is [email protected] Ici [email protected]
    Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
    All I want to hear from JEsus Christ is WEll done Good and Faithful servant

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)