Verily, in article <107u69o$fhc$[email protected]>, did >[email protected] deliver unto us this message:
In article <[email protected]>,
Melissa Hollingsworth <[email protected]> wrote:
Verily, in article <107t87g$2nqf$[email protected]>, did
[email protected] deliver unto us this message:
I imagine the Watcher turning up, and Nyssa saying that she's happy to
go with him but just needs to pack a few things first... and the Watcher
stands there like "WTF? This has never happened before," but his face
glows so Nyssa can't tell.
Just that how did the Watcher get to Traken then Logopolis.
That's a good question. We never saw much about the Watcher on the show, >though the other media developed it a little more. Some say that Cho-Je,
from Planet of the Spiders, was also a Watcher.
Perhaps the simplest way to think of Watchers is as a sort of overlap
between reincarnations. Ideally one incarnation should appear as the
previous one fades, almost like a phoenix, but better an overlap than a
gap.
--
A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always
depend on the support of Paul.
--George Bernard Shaw
Verily, in article <107vebs$1bek$[email protected]>, did [email protected] deliver unto us this message:
But ony 1 TARDIs.
TARDISes don't regenerate, no matter what RTD implied in "The
Giggle."
Verily, in article <[email protected]>, did [email protected] deliver unto us this message:
Melissa Hollingsworth wrote:
Verily, in article <107vebs$1bek$[email protected]>, did
[email protected] deliver unto us this message:
But ony 1 TARDIs.
TARDISes don't regenerate, no matter what RTD implied in "The
Giggle."
I think the term is bi-generate... as there became two of
them... one of them even had a wheelchair ramp... the one
that was created by the bang of a big hammer... how great
was that?
I don't quite understand how "bigeneration" makes another TARDIS. I
don't think RTD did either, frankly.
Verily, in article <107vebs$1bek$[email protected]>, did >[email protected] deliver unto us this message:
Perhaps the simplest way to think of Watchers is as a sort of overlap
between reincarnations. Ideally one incarnation should appear as the
previous one fades, almost like a phoenix, but better an overlap than a
gap.
But ony 1 TARDIs.
TARDISes don't regenerate, no matter what RTD implied in "The Giggle."
--
A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always
depend on the support of Paul.
--George Bernard Shaw
Melissa Hollingsworth wrote:
Verily, in article <107vebs$1bek$[email protected]>, did
[email protected] deliver unto us this message:
But ony 1 TARDIs.
TARDISes don't regenerate, no matter what RTD implied in "The
Giggle."
I think the term is bi-generate... as there became two of
them... one of them even had a wheelchair ramp... the one
that was created by the bang of a big hammer... how great
was that?
Verily, in article <[email protected]>, did [email protected] deliver unto us this message:
Melissa Hollingsworth wrote:
Verily, in article <107vebs$1bek$[email protected]>, did [email protected] deliver unto us this message:
But ony 1 TARDIs.
TARDISes don't regenerate, no matter what RTD implied in
"The Giggle."
I think the term is bi-generate... as there became two of
them... one of them even had a wheelchair ramp... the one
that was created by the bang of a big hammer... how great
was that?
I don't quite understand how "bigeneration" makes another
TARDIS. I don't think RTD did either, frankly.
Melissa Hollingsworth wrote:
Verily, in article <[email protected]>, did
[email protected] deliver unto us this message:
Melissa Hollingsworth wrote:
Verily, in article <107vebs$1bek$[email protected]>, did
[email protected] deliver unto us this message:
But ony 1 TARDIs.
TARDISes don't regenerate, no matter what RTD implied in
"The Giggle."
I think the term is bi-generate... as there became two of
them... one of them even had a wheelchair ramp... the one
that was created by the bang of a big hammer... how great
was that?
I don't quite understand how "bigeneration" makes another
TARDIS. I don't think RTD did either, frankly.
Everyone's a cynic! I'm sure in RTD's world if you can create
two Doctor's from one Doctor by pulling one out of the other's
body, and that makes sense to you... then [bang a hammer and]
creating a second TARDIS is just as rational... it's fantasy
writing 101. (aka making it up as you go along.)
:-)
Melissa Hollingsworth wrote:
Verily, in article <[email protected]>, did
[email protected] deliver unto us this message:
Melissa Hollingsworth wrote:
Verily, in article <107vebs$1bek$[email protected]>, did
[email protected] deliver unto us this message:
But ony 1 TARDIs.
TARDISes don't regenerate, no matter what RTD implied in
"The Giggle."
I think the term is bi-generate... as there became two of
them... one of them even had a wheelchair ramp... the one
that was created by the bang of a big hammer... how great
was that?
I don't quite understand how "bigeneration" makes another
TARDIS. I don't think RTD did either, frankly.
Everyone's a cynic! I'm sure in RTD's world if you can create
two Doctor's from one Doctor by pulling one out of the other's
body, and that makes sense to you... then [bang a hammer and]
creating a second TARDIS is just as rational... it's fantasy
writing 101. (aka making it up as you go along.)
:-)
On 19/08/2025 10:05, Blueshirt wrote:
Melissa Hollingsworth wrote:
Verily, in article <[email protected]>, did
[email protected] deliver unto us this message:
Melissa Hollingsworth wrote:
Verily, in article <107vebs$1bek$[email protected]>, did
[email protected] deliver unto us this message:
But ony 1 TARDIs.
TARDISes don't regenerate, no matter what RTD implied in
"The Giggle."
I think the term is bi-generate... as there became two of
them... one of them even had a wheelchair ramp... the one
that was created by the bang of a big hammer... how great
was that?
I don't quite understand how "bigeneration" makes another
TARDIS. I don't think RTD did either, frankly.
Everyone's a cynic! I'm sure in RTD's world if you can create
two Doctor's from one Doctor by pulling one out of the other's
body, and that makes sense to you... then [bang a hammer and]
creating a second TARDIS is just as rational... it's fantasy
writing 101. (aka making it up as you go along.)
:-)
It's infantile writing 101. Even fantasy has to follow a set of
consistent logical rules which make sense.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
Patially.
The Binky Doctor wrote:^^^^^<-PAedophile talker noted
Patially.
You illiterate fuckwit.
https://postimg.cc/YvcdRMFx
Verily, in article <185d3d51bed07c3f$33175$1592711 >$[email protected]>, did [email protected] deliver unto us
this message:
You illiterate fuckwit.
https://postimg.cc/YvcdRMFx
That could not look any faker if you went over it with an electric make- >it-look-fake machine.
--
A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always
depend on the support of Paul.
--George Bernard Shaw
In article <[email protected]>,
Melissa Hollingsworth <[email protected]> wrote:
Verily, in article <185d3d51bed07c3f$33175$1592711
$[email protected]>, did [email protected] deliver unto us
this message:
>
You illiterate fuckwit.
https://postimg.cc/YvcdRMFx
That could not look any faker if you went over it with an electric make-
it-look-fake machine.
Rudy is overall fake.
Verily, in article <185d3d51bed07c3f$33175$1592711 $[email protected]>, did [email protected] deliver unto us
this message:
>
You illiterate fuckwit.
https://postimg.cc/YvcdRMFx
That could not look any faker if you went over it with an electric make- it-look-fake machine.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 715 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 27:28:34 |
| Calls: | 12,106 |
| Calls today: | 6 |
| Files: | 15,006 |
| Messages: | 6,518,211 |