The sick, degenerate, perverted incel Ncuti Gatwa could only get 1.86
million viewers to watch him cry once again and make disgusting
unsolicited sexual advances towards men that didn't want to sleep with
him and suggest that his companion's mum whistles up his arse. I am not >joking.
These are the second worst viewing figures of all time.
Meanwhile, Planet of the Incels, now the third worst rating episode of
all time could only get 3.36 million people to witness being attacked
and insulted by the sick, degenerate, sex obsessed pervert of a writer >Russell T Davies over 7 days, and 3.57 million including iPlayer and
mobile devices.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
The sick, degenerate, perverted incel Ncuti Gatwa could only get 1.86
million viewers to watch him cry once again and make disgusting
unsolicited sexual advances towards men that didn't want to sleep with
him and suggest that his companion's mum whistles up his arse. I am not joking.
On 4/27/2025 04:38, The True Doctor wrote:
The sick, degenerate, perverted incel Ncuti Gatwa could only get 1.86
million viewers to watch him cry once again and make disgusting
unsolicited sexual advances towards men that didn't want to sleep with
him and suggest that his companion's mum whistles up his arse. I am
not joking.
No, you are not joking....you are spewing so much bullshit that the
mound is now higher than Mt. Everest. Other than crying, nothing you
said happened took place in that episode. The only other accurate thing
you said was the overnights. Why must you lie?
On 27/04/2025 17:37, Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 4/27/2025 04:38, The True Doctor wrote:
The sick, degenerate, perverted incel Ncuti Gatwa could only get 1.86
million viewers to watch him cry once again and make disgusting
unsolicited sexual advances towards men that didn't want to sleep with
him and suggest that his companion's mum whistles up his arse. I am
not joking.
No, you are not joking....you are spewing so much bullshit that the
mound is now higher than Mt. Everest. Other than crying, nothing you
said happened took place in that episode. The only other accurate thing
you said was the overnights. Why must you lie?
You obviously didn't watch the episode and a lying.
What do you think "babes" was? It was an unsolicited sexual advance by
this pervert towards others which he repeated on multiple occasions
despite being told not to. If a man had said that to every woman he'd
met it would be denounced as sexual harassment.
Did you not hear the disgusting pervert also say "and your mum can
whistle up my behind", to Belinda? Again the pervert is engaged in
sexual harassment and is encouraging sexual abuse towards others.
This is degenerate woke double standards for you. Sick, sick, sick!
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
On 4/27/2025 04:38, The True Doctor wrote:
The sick, degenerate, perverted incel Ncuti Gatwa could only get 1.86
million viewers to watch him cry once again and make disgusting
unsolicited sexual advances towards men that didn't want to sleep with
him and suggest that his companion's mum whistles up his arse. I am
not joking.
No, you are not joking....you are spewing so much bullshit that the
mound is now higher than Mt. Everest. Other than crying, nothing you
said happened took place in that episode. The only other accurate thing
you said was the overnights. Why must you lie?
Idlehands wrote:
On 2025-04-27 10:37 a.m., Hornplayer9599 wrote:who else would wonder why a guy likes arses
On 4/27/2025 04:38, The True Doctor wrote:
The sick, degenerate, perverted incel Ncuti Gatwa could only get 1.86
million viewers to watch him cry once again and make disgusting
unsolicited sexual advances towards men that didn't want to sleep
with him and suggest that his companion's mum whistles up his arse. I
am not joking.
No, you are not joking....you are spewing so much bullshit that the
mound is now higher than Mt. Everest. Other than crying, nothing you
said happened took place in that episode. The only other accurate
thing you said was the overnights. Why must you lie?
So 1.86 million people viewed the episode despite Aggy's "sacrifice" of
watching it so others didn't have to.
Could it be that he does not speak for the "majority" of the Earth or
could it be no one reads his reviews other than the regulars here?
He sure is obsessed with arses, I wonder why?
On 2025-04-27 10:37 a.m., Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 4/27/2025 04:38, The True Doctor wrote:
The sick, degenerate, perverted incel Ncuti Gatwa could only get 1.86
million viewers to watch him cry once again and make disgusting
unsolicited sexual advances towards men that didn't want to sleep
with him and suggest that his companion's mum whistles up his arse. I
am not joking.
No, you are not joking....you are spewing so much bullshit that the
mound is now higher than Mt. Everest. Other than crying, nothing you
said happened took place in that episode. The only other accurate
thing you said was the overnights. Why must you lie?
So 1.86 million people viewed the episode despite Aggy's "sacrifice" of watching it so others didn't have to.
Could it be that he does not speak for the "majority" of the Earth or
could it be no one reads his reviews other than the regulars here?
He sure is obsessed with arses, I wonder why?
On 4/27/2025 21:59, Idlehands wrote:
On 2025-04-27 10:37 a.m., Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 4/27/2025 04:38, The True Doctor wrote:
The sick, degenerate, perverted incel Ncuti Gatwa could only get 1.86
million viewers to watch him cry once again and make disgusting
unsolicited sexual advances towards men that didn't want to sleep
with him and suggest that his companion's mum whistles up his arse. I
am not joking.
No, you are not joking....you are spewing so much bullshit that the
mound is now higher than Mt. Everest. Other than crying, nothing you
said happened took place in that episode. The only other accurate
thing you said was the overnights. Why must you lie?
So 1.86 million people viewed the episode despite Aggy's "sacrifice" of
watching it so others didn't have to.
So much for his martyr play.
Could it be that he does not speak for the "majority" of the Earth or
could it be no one reads his reviews other than the regulars here?
Perhaps both. Add in that what he puts in his "reviews" are basically >misquotes and other views taken out of context (classic example of
outcome bias) from other people...and then he just tries to parrot what
they said while claiming that "everyone agrees with me" (delusion of >grandeur).
He sure is obsessed with arses, I wonder why?
You don't remember? About 10 or so years ago, we had a discussion about >Aggy's "obsession" here and we pretty much all came to the same
conclusion. Aggy became so unhinged that he tried to Killfile all of
Usenet.
--
Intelligence is no guarantee against being dead wrong.
--Carl Sagan
On 4/27/2025 21:59, Idlehands wrote:
On 2025-04-27 10:37 a.m., Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 4/27/2025 04:38, The True Doctor wrote:
The sick, degenerate, perverted incel Ncuti Gatwa could only get
1.86 million viewers to watch him cry once again and make disgusting
unsolicited sexual advances towards men that didn't want to sleep
with him and suggest that his companion's mum whistles up his arse.
I am not joking.
No, you are not joking....you are spewing so much bullshit that the
mound is now higher than Mt. Everest. Other than crying, nothing you
said happened took place in that episode. The only other accurate
thing you said was the overnights. Why must you lie?
So 1.86 million people viewed the episode despite Aggy's "sacrifice"
of watching it so others didn't have to.
So much for his martyr play.
Could it be that he does not speak for the "majority" of the Earth or
could it be no one reads his reviews other than the regulars here?
Perhaps both. Add in that what he puts in his "reviews" are basically misquotes and other views taken out of context (classic example of
outcome bias) from other people...and then he just tries to parrot what
they said while claiming that "everyone agrees with me" (delusion of grandeur).
He sure is obsessed with arses, I wonder why?
You don't remember? About 10 or so years ago, we had a discussion about Aggy's "obsession" here and we pretty much all came to the same
conclusion. Aggy became so unhinged that he tried to Killfile all of Usenet.
On 4/27/2025 21:59, Idlehands wrote:
On 2025-04-27 10:37 a.m., Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 4/27/2025 04:38, The True Doctor wrote:
The sick, degenerate, perverted incel Ncuti Gatwa could only get
1.86 million viewers to watch him cry once again and make disgusting
unsolicited sexual advances towards men that didn't want to sleep
with him and suggest that his companion's mum whistles up his arse.
I am not joking.
No, you are not joking....you are spewing so much bullshit that the
mound is now higher than Mt. Everest. Other than crying, nothing you
said happened took place in that episode. The only other accurate
thing you said was the overnights. Why must you lie?
So 1.86 million people viewed the episode despite Aggy's "sacrifice"
of watching it so others didn't have to.
So much for his martyr play.
Could it be that he does not speak for the "majority" of the Earth or
could it be no one reads his reviews other than the regulars here?
Perhaps both. Add in that what he puts in his "reviews" are basically misquotes and other views taken out of context (classic example of
outcome bias) from other people...and then he just tries to parrot what
they said while claiming that "everyone agrees with me" (delusion of grandeur).
He sure is obsessed with arses, I wonder why?
You don't remember? About 10 or so years ago, we had a discussion about Aggy's "obsession" here and we pretty much all came to the same
conclusion. Aggy became so unhinged that he tried to Killfile all of Usenet.
On 28/04/2025 12:42, Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 4/27/2025 21:59, Idlehands wrote:
On 2025-04-27 10:37 a.m., Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 4/27/2025 04:38, The True Doctor wrote:
The sick, degenerate, perverted incel Ncuti Gatwa could only get
1.86 million viewers to watch him cry once again and make disgusting >>>>> unsolicited sexual advances towards men that didn't want to sleep
with him and suggest that his companion's mum whistles up his arse.
I am not joking.
No, you are not joking....you are spewing so much bullshit that the
mound is now higher than Mt. Everest. Other than crying, nothing you >>>> said happened took place in that episode. The only other accurate
thing you said was the overnights. Why must you lie?
So 1.86 million people viewed the episode despite Aggy's "sacrifice"
of watching it so others didn't have to.
So much for his martyr play.
Look at all the lies and dissembling going on like the conmen trying to
sell the Emperor and invisible set of clothes for his birthday.
1.86 million is the second lowest overnight rating in the show's entier >history. 5/6 of the shows audience has left or been driven away by woke >bigotry and attacks.
Since 1.5 million people are always tuned to BBC1 no matter what's one
it, the actual audience that watched the last episode rather than having
the TV switched on in the back ground was only 360,000. In the previous >episode the show could only manage 80,000.
Could it be that he does not speak for the "majority" of the Earth or
could it be no one reads his reviews other than the regulars here?
Perhaps both. Add in that what he puts in his "reviews" are basically
misquotes and other views taken out of context (classic example of
outcome bias) from other people...and then he just tries to parrot what
they said while claiming that "everyone agrees with me" (delusion of
grandeur).
And the sick degenerate woke apologists continue to lie, and lie, and
lie in the face of direct quotes and the actual evidence.
Do you deny that the lead character was written to sexually harass other >characters by repeatedly calling them 'babes' despite being told to
desist? Do you think that this kind of behaviour is a suitable example
to set to viewers? Do you think that children should call other children >'babes'? What do you believe that this kind of behaviour would imply?
Do you deny that the lead character suggested that his companion's mum
should be allowed to whistle up his behind? The direct quote from the >episodes is "and your mum can whistle up my behind". This can easily be
found in the iPlayer recording so anyone can check and confirm it?
Do you not believe that this also constitutes sexual harassment of the >companion and their mother?
Do you think that this kind of disgusting behaviour should be portrayed
on television, especially in a family TV show directed at children?
Would you encourage a child you are responsible for to call others 'babes'?
Would you encourage a child you are responsible for to suggest to others
that they should whistle up or even at their behinds?
What do you think that engaging in such behaviour would result in,
especially if a female child carried it out towards an adult male?
Do you think that this kind of behaviour even by an adult, behaviour
which amounts to sexual harassment, and child abuse, is acceptable?
Do you think the degenerate perverted writers that wrote this disgusting >dialogue and encouraged this kind of disgusting behaviour should keep
their jobs? Do you not think that they should be sacked? If not why not?
He sure is obsessed with arses, I wonder why?
You don't remember? About 10 or so years ago, we had a discussion about
Aggy's "obsession" here and we pretty much all came to the same
conclusion. Aggy became so unhinged that he tried to Killfile all of
Usenet.
You have become so unhinged that you condone systematic and repeated
sexual harassment and child abuse including the sexual grooming of
children, and make up lies in order to try to pretend it did not happen
when anyone can watch the actual episode on iPlayer and confirm it for >themselves.
Just like all the woke you are a sick disgusting hypocritical pervert!
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
On 2025-04-28 5:42 a.m., Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 4/27/2025 21:59, Idlehands wrote:
On 2025-04-27 10:37 a.m., Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 4/27/2025 04:38, The True Doctor wrote:
The sick, degenerate, perverted incel Ncuti Gatwa could only get
1.86 million viewers to watch him cry once again and make
disgusting unsolicited sexual advances towards men that didn't want
to sleep with him and suggest that his companion's mum whistles up
his arse. I am not joking.
No, you are not joking....you are spewing so much bullshit that the
mound is now higher than Mt. Everest. Other than crying, nothing
you said happened took place in that episode. The only other
accurate thing you said was the overnights. Why must you lie?
So 1.86 million people viewed the episode despite Aggy's "sacrifice"
of watching it so others didn't have to.
So much for his martyr play.
Could it be that he does not speak for the "majority" of the Earth or
could it be no one reads his reviews other than the regulars here?
Perhaps both. Add in that what he puts in his "reviews" are basically
misquotes and other views taken out of context (classic example of
outcome bias) from other people...and then he just tries to parrot
what they said while claiming that "everyone agrees with me" (delusion
of grandeur).
He sure is obsessed with arses, I wonder why?
You don't remember? About 10 or so years ago, we had a discussion
about Aggy's "obsession" here and we pretty much all came to the same
conclusion. Aggy became so unhinged that he tried to Killfile all of
Usenet.
I guess I missed that one, He was probably in my kill file back then
like today. Will check out the archives.
On 4/28/2025 07:59, Idlehands wrote:
On 2025-04-28 5:42 a.m., Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 4/27/2025 21:59, Idlehands wrote:
On 2025-04-27 10:37 a.m., Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 4/27/2025 04:38, The True Doctor wrote:
The sick, degenerate, perverted incel Ncuti Gatwa could only get
1.86 million viewers to watch him cry once again and make
disgusting unsolicited sexual advances towards men that didn't
want to sleep with him and suggest that his companion's mum
whistles up his arse. I am not joking.
No, you are not joking....you are spewing so much bullshit that the
mound is now higher than Mt. Everest. Other than crying, nothing
you said happened took place in that episode. The only other
accurate thing you said was the overnights. Why must you lie?
So 1.86 million people viewed the episode despite Aggy's "sacrifice"
of watching it so others didn't have to.
So much for his martyr play.
Could it be that he does not speak for the "majority" of the Earth
or could it be no one reads his reviews other than the regulars here?
Perhaps both. Add in that what he puts in his "reviews" are
basically misquotes and other views taken out of context (classic
example of outcome bias) from other people...and then he just tries
to parrot what they said while claiming that "everyone agrees with
me" (delusion of grandeur).
He sure is obsessed with arses, I wonder why?
You don't remember? About 10 or so years ago, we had a discussion
about Aggy's "obsession" here and we pretty much all came to the same
conclusion. Aggy became so unhinged that he tried to Killfile all of
Usenet.
I guess I missed that one, He was probably in my kill file back then
like today. Will check out the archives.
Yep...the more he listens to the voices in his head, the more unhinged
he becomes, the more hilarious he is. Of course, one can only take so
much of him no matter how much he implodes...I've sent him back to "time out".
On 4/28/2025 07:59, Idlehands wrote:
On 2025-04-28 5:42 a.m., Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 4/27/2025 21:59, Idlehands wrote:
On 2025-04-27 10:37 a.m., Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 4/27/2025 04:38, The True Doctor wrote:
The sick, degenerate, perverted incel Ncuti Gatwa could only get
1.86 million viewers to watch him cry once again and make
disgusting unsolicited sexual advances towards men that didn't want >>>>>> to sleep with him and suggest that his companion's mum whistles up >>>>>> his arse. I am not joking.
No, you are not joking....you are spewing so much bullshit that the
mound is now higher than Mt. Everest. Other than crying, nothing
you said happened took place in that episode. The only other
accurate thing you said was the overnights. Why must you lie?
So 1.86 million people viewed the episode despite Aggy's "sacrifice"
of watching it so others didn't have to.
So much for his martyr play.
Could it be that he does not speak for the "majority" of the Earth or
could it be no one reads his reviews other than the regulars here?
Perhaps both. Add in that what he puts in his "reviews" are basically
misquotes and other views taken out of context (classic example of
outcome bias) from other people...and then he just tries to parrot
what they said while claiming that "everyone agrees with me" (delusion
of grandeur).
He sure is obsessed with arses, I wonder why?
You don't remember? About 10 or so years ago, we had a discussion
about Aggy's "obsession" here and we pretty much all came to the same
conclusion. Aggy became so unhinged that he tried to Killfile all of
Usenet.
I guess I missed that one, He was probably in my kill file back then
like today. Will check out the archives.
Yep...the more he listens to the voices in his head, the more unhinged
he becomes, the more hilarious he is. Of course, one can only take so
much of him no matter how much he implodes...I've sent him back to "time >out".
--
Intelligence is no guarantee against being dead wrong.
--Carl Sagan
On 29/04/2025 03:46, Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 4/28/2025 07:59, Idlehands wrote:
On 2025-04-28 5:42 a.m., Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 4/27/2025 21:59, Idlehands wrote:
On 2025-04-27 10:37 a.m., Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 4/27/2025 04:38, The True Doctor wrote:
The sick, degenerate, perverted incel Ncuti Gatwa could only get >>>>>>> 1.86 million viewers to watch him cry once again and make
disgusting unsolicited sexual advances towards men that didn't
want to sleep with him and suggest that his companion's mum
whistles up his arse. I am not joking.
No, you are not joking....you are spewing so much bullshit that the >>>>>> mound is now higher than Mt. Everest. Other than crying, nothing >>>>>> you said happened took place in that episode. The only other
accurate thing you said was the overnights. Why must you lie?
So 1.86 million people viewed the episode despite Aggy's "sacrifice" >>>>> of watching it so others didn't have to.
So much for his martyr play.
Could it be that he does not speak for the "majority" of the Earth
or could it be no one reads his reviews other than the regulars here? >>>>>
Perhaps both. Add in that what he puts in his "reviews" are
basically misquotes and other views taken out of context (classic
example of outcome bias) from other people...and then he just tries
to parrot what they said while claiming that "everyone agrees with
me" (delusion of grandeur).
He sure is obsessed with arses, I wonder why?
You don't remember? About 10 or so years ago, we had a discussion
about Aggy's "obsession" here and we pretty much all came to the same
conclusion. Aggy became so unhinged that he tried to Killfile all of >>>> Usenet.
I guess I missed that one, He was probably in my kill file back then
like today. Will check out the archives.
Yep...the more he listens to the voices in his head, the more unhinged
he becomes, the more hilarious he is. Of course, one can only take so
much of him no matter how much he implodes...I've sent him back to "time
out".
Too scared to answer my questions you sick degenerate pervert.
Do you deny that the lead character was written to sexually harass other >characters by repeatedly calling them 'babes' despite being told to
desist? Do you think that this kind of behaviour is a suitable example
to set to viewers? Do you think that children should call other children >'babes'? What do you believe that this kind of behaviour would imply?
Do you deny that the lead character suggested that his companion's mum
should be allowed to whistle up his behind? The direct quote from the >episodes is "and your mum can whistle up my behind". This can easily be
found in the iPlayer recording so anyone can check and confirm it?
Do you not believe that this also constitutes sexual harassment of the >companion and their mother?
Do you think that this kind of disgusting behaviour should be portrayed
on television, especially in a family TV show directed at children?
Would you encourage a child you are responsible for to call others 'babes'?
Would you encourage a child you are responsible for to suggest to others
that they should whistle up or even at their behinds?
What do you think that engaging in such behaviour would result in,
especially if a female child carried it out towards an adult male?
Do you think that this kind of behaviour even by an adult, behaviour
which amounts to sexual harassment, and child abuse, is acceptable?
Do you think the degenerate perverted writers that wrote this disgusting >dialogue and encouraged this kind of disgusting behaviour should keep
their jobs? Do you not think that they should be sacked? If not why not?
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
Too scared to answer my questions you sick degenerate pervert.
Do you deny that the lead character was written to sexually harass other characters by repeatedly calling them 'babes' despite being told to
desist? Do you think that this kind of behaviour is a suitable example
to set to viewers? Do you think that children should call other children 'babes'? What do you believe that this kind of behaviour would imply?
Do you deny that the lead character suggested that his companion's mum
should be allowed to whistle up his behind? The direct quote from the episodes is "and your mum can whistle up my behind". This can easily be
found in the iPlayer recording so anyone can check and confirm it?
Do you not believe that this also constitutes sexual harassment of the companion and their mother?
Do you think that this kind of disgusting behaviour should be portrayed
on television, especially in a family TV show directed at children?
Would you encourage a child you are responsible for to call others 'babes'?
Would you encourage a child you are responsible for to suggest to others
that they should whistle up or even at their behinds?
What do you think that engaging in such behaviour would result in,
especially if a female child carried it out towards an adult male?
Do you think that this kind of behaviour even by an adult, behaviour
which amounts to sexual harassment, and child abuse, is acceptable?
Do you think the degenerate perverted writers that wrote this disgusting dialogue and encouraged this kind of disgusting behaviour should keep
their jobs? Do you not think that they should be sacked? If not why not?
Isn't this (just about) a direct re-post of a previous post by YOU,
Aggy?? Is YOUR memory failing YOU, Aggy??
On 29/04/2025 12:59 pm, The True Doctor wrote:
<Snip<
Too scared to answer my questions you sick degenerate pervert.Isn't this (just about) a direct re-post of a previous post by YOU,
Do you deny that the lead character was written to sexually harass
other characters by repeatedly calling them 'babes' despite being told
to desist? Do you think that this kind of behaviour is a suitable
example to set to viewers? Do you think that children should call
other children 'babes'? What do you believe that this kind of
behaviour would imply?
Do you deny that the lead character suggested that his companion's mum
should be allowed to whistle up his behind? The direct quote from the
episodes is "and your mum can whistle up my behind". This can easily
be found in the iPlayer recording so anyone can check and confirm it?
Do you not believe that this also constitutes sexual harassment of the
companion and their mother?
Do you think that this kind of disgusting behaviour should be
portrayed on television, especially in a family TV show directed at
children?
Would you encourage a child you are responsible for to call others
'babes'?
Would you encourage a child you are responsible for to suggest to
others that they should whistle up or even at their behinds?
What do you think that engaging in such behaviour would result in,
especially if a female child carried it out towards an adult male?
Do you think that this kind of behaviour even by an adult, behaviour
which amounts to sexual harassment, and child abuse, is acceptable?
Do you think the degenerate perverted writers that wrote this
disgusting dialogue and encouraged this kind of disgusting behaviour
should keep their jobs? Do you not think that they should be sacked?
If not why not?
Aggy?? Is YOUR memory failing YOU, Aggy??
On 4/29/2025 04:39, Daniel70 wrote:
On 29/04/2025 12:59 pm, The True Doctor wrote:
[Snip]
Do you think that this kind of behaviour even by an adult,
behaviour which amounts to sexual harassment, and child
abuse, is acceptable?
Do you think the degenerate perverted writers that wrote
this disgusting dialogue and encouraged this kind of
disgusting behaviour should keep their jobs? Do you not
think that they should be sacked? If not why not?
Isn't this (just about) a direct re-post of a previous post
by YOU, Aggy?? Is YOUR memory failing YOU, Aggy??
No...he's just moved on from delusions of grandeur to
delusions of persecution.
On 29/04/2025 12:59 pm, The True Doctor wrote:
Too scared to answer my questions you sick degenerate
pervert.
[Snip]
Do you think the degenerate perverted writers that wrote
this disgusting dialogue and encouraged this kind of
disgusting behaviour should keep their jobs? Do you not
think that they should be sacked? If not why not?
Isn't this (just about) a direct re-post of a previous post by
YOU, Aggy?? Is YOUR memory failing YOU, Aggy??
On 4/29/2025 04:39, Daniel70 wrote:
Isn't this (just about) a direct re-post of a previous post
by YOU, Aggy?? Is YOUR memory failing YOU, Aggy??
No, this is typical Aggy methodology. When he's challenged,
and proven wrong repeatedly by everybody, he repeats the same
thing over and over as if that's going to change anything.
Remember the saying, "Insanity is doing the same thing over
and over and expecting a different result".
Daniel70 wrote:
On 29/04/2025 12:59 pm, The True Doctor wrote:
Too scared to answer my questions you sick degenerateIsn't this (just about) a direct re-post of a previous post by
pervert.
[Snip]
Do you think the degenerate perverted writers that wrote
this disgusting dialogue and encouraged this kind of
disgusting behaviour should keep their jobs? Do you not
think that they should be sacked? If not why not?
YOU, Aggy?? Is YOUR memory failing YOU, Aggy??
Maybe it's all AI generated?
Instead of Chat-GPT us lucky readers of RADW have AGA-GPT...
In article <[email protected]>,
Blueshirt <[email protected]> wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
Isn't this (just about) a direct re-post of a previous post
by YOU, Aggy?? Is YOUR memory failing YOU, Aggy??
Maybe it's all AI generated?
Instead of Chat-GPT us lucky readers of RADW have AGA-GPT...
Stoking flames yet again!
Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 4/29/2025 04:39, Daniel70 wrote:
Isn't this (just about) a direct re-post of a previous post
by YOU, Aggy?? Is YOUR memory failing YOU, Aggy??
No, this is typical Aggy methodology. When he's challenged,
and proven wrong repeatedly by everybody, he repeats the same
thing over and over as if that's going to change anything.
Remember the saying, "Insanity is doing the same thing over
and over and expecting a different result".
The thing is, no matter how often anyone posts any opinion on
Doctor Who, nobody is going to change their point of view based
on some post on Usenet.
Agamemnon has his 'unique' take on the show, which he is fully
entitled to... but no matter how often he bangs on about
perversion and sexual grooming, nobody else is going to be
converted to his point of view. So he might as well save his
time and not bother repeating himself all the time.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <[email protected]>,
Blueshirt <[email protected]> wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
Isn't this (just about) a direct re-post of a previous post
by YOU, Aggy?? Is YOUR memory failing YOU, Aggy??
Maybe it's all AI generated?
Instead of Chat-GPT us lucky readers of RADW have AGA-GPT...
Stoking flames yet again!
In fairness, Agamemnon's AI generated posts have a lot more
reading content than yours!
I like to sit down with my tea and be entertained... your posts
wouldn't entertain a gnat.
On 4/29/2025 04:39, Daniel70 wrote:
Isn't this (just about) a direct re-post of a previous post by YOU,
Aggy?? Is YOUR memory failing YOU, Aggy??
No, this is typical Aggy methodology. When he's challenged, and proven
wrong repeatedly by everybody, he repeats the same thing over and over
as if that's going to change anything. Remember the saying, "Insanity
is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result".
Daniel70 wrote:
On 29/04/2025 12:59 pm, The True Doctor wrote:
Too scared to answer my questions you sick degenerateIsn't this (just about) a direct re-post of a previous post by
pervert.
[Snip]
Do you think the degenerate perverted writers that wrote
this disgusting dialogue and encouraged this kind of
disgusting behaviour should keep their jobs? Do you not
think that they should be sacked? If not why not?
YOU, Aggy?? Is YOUR memory failing YOU, Aggy??
Maybe it's all AI generated?
Instead of Chat-GPT us lucky readers of RADW have AGA-GPT...
Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 4/29/2025 04:39, Daniel70 wrote:
Isn't this (just about) a direct re-post of a previous post
by YOU, Aggy?? Is YOUR memory failing YOU, Aggy??
No, this is typical Aggy methodology. When he's challenged,
and proven wrong repeatedly by everybody, he repeats the same
thing over and over as if that's going to change anything.
Remember the saying, "Insanity is doing the same thing over
and over and expecting a different result".
The thing is, no matter how often anyone posts any opinion on
Doctor Who, nobody is going to change their point of view based
on some post on Usenet.
Agamemnon has his 'unique' take on the show, which he is fully
entitled to... but no matter how often he bangs on about
perversion and sexual grooming, nobody else is going to be
converted to his point of view. So he might as well save his
time and not bother repeating himself all the time.
On 29/04/2025 14:11, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 29/04/2025 12:59 pm, The True Doctor wrote:
Too scared to answer my questions you sick degenerateIsn't this (just about) a direct re-post of a previous post by
pervert.
[Snip]
Do you think the degenerate perverted writers that wrote
this disgusting dialogue and encouraged this kind of
disgusting behaviour should keep their jobs? Do you not
think that they should be sacked? If not why not?
YOU, Aggy?? Is YOUR memory failing YOU, Aggy??
Maybe it's all AI generated?
Instead of Chat-GPT us lucky readers of RADW have AGA-GPT...
And still the woke degenerates refuse to answer clear questions
concerning morality, because they know their perverted ideology which >sanctions the actions of child molesters cannot be defended.
Do you deny that the lead character was written to sexually harass other >characters by repeatedly calling them 'babes' despite being told to
desist? Do you think that this kind of behaviour is a suitable example
to set to viewers? Do you think that children should call other children >'babes'? What do you believe that this kind of behaviour would imply?
Do you deny that the lead character suggested that his companion's mum
should be allowed to whistle up his behind? The direct quote from the >episodes is "and your mum can whistle up my behind". This can easily be
found in the iPlayer recording so anyone can check and confirm it?
Do you not believe that this also constitutes sexual harassment of the >companion and their mother?
Do you think that this kind of disgusting behaviour should be portrayed
on television, especially in a family TV show directed at children?
Would you encourage a child you are responsible for to call others 'babes'?
Would you encourage a child you are responsible for to suggest to others
that they should whistle up or even at their behinds?
What do you think that engaging in such behaviour would result in,
especially if a female child carried it out towards an adult male?
Do you think that this kind of behaviour even by an adult, behaviour
which amounts to sexual harassment, and child abuse, is acceptable?
Do you think the degenerate perverted writers that wrote this disgusting >dialogue and encouraged this kind of disgusting behaviour should keep
their jobs? Do you not think that they should be sacked? If not why not?
If you didn't answer each question with the truth then you've lost the >argument.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
On 29/04/2025 11:16 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
Hornplayer9599 wrote:
No, this is typical Aggy methodology. When he's
challenged, and proven wrong repeatedly by everybody, he
repeats the same thing over and over as if that's going to
change anything. Remember the saying, "Insanity is doing
the same thing over and over and expecting a different
result".
The thing is, no matter how often anyone posts any opinion on
Doctor Who, nobody is going to change their point of view
based on some post on Usenet.
Agamemnon has his 'unique' take on the show, which he is
fully entitled to... but no matter how often he bangs on
about perversion and sexual grooming, nobody else is going
to be converted to his point of view. So he might as well
save his time and not bother repeating himself all the time.
I suppose, to a greater or lessor extent, the same could be
typed about all of us!!
On 29/04/2025 14:16, Blueshirt wrote:
Agamemnon has his 'unique' take on the show, which he is
fully entitled to... but no matter how often he bangs on
about perversion and sexual grooming, nobody else is going
to be converted to his point of view. So he might as well
save his time and not bother repeating himself all the time.
And Ukraine should just give up all of it's territory to
Putin, except for the mines which it should give to Trump.
That is the sick degenerate mindset of the woke. That's how
perverts like Huw Edwards and Jimmy Saville were allowed to
carry out their crimes at the BBC with out it batting an
eyelid.
[Predictable AGA-GPT generated word salad snipped]
If you didn't answer each question with the truth then you've
lost the argument.
Blueshirt loves to stoke flames.
On 29/04/2025 14:11, Blueshirt wrote:
Maybe it's all AI generated?
Instead of Chat-GPT us lucky readers of RADW have AGA-GPT...
And still the woke degenerates refuse to answer clear
questions concerning morality, because they know their
perverted ideology which sanctions the actions of child
molesters cannot be defended.
Do you deny that the lead character was written to sexually
harass other characters by repeatedly calling them 'babes'
despite being told to desist? Do you think that this kind of
behaviour is a suitable example to set to viewers? Do you
think that children should call other children 'babes'? What
do you believe that this kind of behaviour would imply?
Do you deny that the lead character suggested that his
companion's mum should be allowed to whistle up his behind?
The direct quote from the episodes is "and your mum can
whistle up my behind". This can easily be found in the iPlayer
recording so anyone can check and confirm it?
Do you not believe that this also constitutes sexual
harassment of the companion and their mother?
Do you think that this kind of disgusting behaviour should be
portrayed on television, especially in a family TV show
directed at children?
Would you encourage a child you are responsible for to call
others 'babes'?
Would you encourage a child you are responsible for to suggest
to others that they should whistle up or even at their behinds?
What do you think that engaging in such behaviour would result
in, especially if a female child carried it out towards an
adult male?
Do you think that this kind of behaviour even by an adult,
behaviour which amounts to sexual harassment, and child abuse,
is acceptable?
Do you think the degenerate perverted writers that wrote this
disgusting dialogue and encouraged this kind of disgusting
behaviour should keep their jobs? Do you not think that they
should be sacked? If not why not?
If you didn't answer each question with the truth then you've
lost the argument.
On 29/04/2025 11:16 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
Hornplayer9599 wrote:I suppose, to a greater or lessor extent, the same could be typed about
On 4/29/2025 04:39, Daniel70 wrote:
Isn't this (just about) a direct re-post of a previous post
by YOU, Aggy?? Is YOUR memory failing YOU, Aggy??
No, this is typical Aggy methodology. When he's challenged,
and proven wrong repeatedly by everybody, he repeats the same
thing over and over as if that's going to change anything.
Remember the saying, "Insanity is doing the same thing over
and over and expecting a different result".
The thing is, no matter how often anyone posts any opinion on
Doctor Who, nobody is going to change their point of view based
on some post on Usenet.
Agamemnon has his 'unique' take on the show, which he is fully
entitled to... but no matter how often he bangs on about
perversion and sexual grooming, nobody else is going to be
converted to his point of view. So he might as well save his
time and not bother repeating himself all the time.
all of us!!
The True Doctor wrote:
[Predictable AGA-GPT generated word salad snipped]
If you didn't answer each question with the truth then you've
lost the argument.
There is no argument, there is your opinion... and there is
everyone else's. You represent the minority viewpoint here. Your
'take' on modern "Doctor Who" is an extreme take that nobody
else I know shares... and I know a lot of Doctor Who fans.
You are too busy trying to pull apart every single line in every
single scene of every single episode that you can't actually sit
down and enjoy the show. You are a hater who wants to see the
show cancelled, which makes you part of the woke brigade. "I
don't like this - it needs to be cancelled."
Ironical eh? You are what you criticise!
On 4/29/2025 09:23, Daniel70 wrote:
On 29/04/2025 11:16 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
Agamemnon has his 'unique' take on the show, which he is
fully entitled to... but no matter how often he bangs on
about perversion and sexual grooming, nobody else is going
to be converted to his point of view. So he might as well
save his time and not bother repeating himself all the
time.
I suppose, to a greater or lessor extent, the same could be
typed about all of us!!
True, but I would say "lessor" for everyone here, save one. I
mean...just how many of us constantly go off the rails about...everything...and have been doing so for years?
Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 4/29/2025 09:23, Daniel70 wrote:
On 29/04/2025 11:16 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
I suppose, to a greater or lessor extent, the same could be
Agamemnon has his 'unique' take on the show, which he is
fully entitled to... but no matter how often he bangs on
about perversion and sexual grooming, nobody else is going
to be converted to his point of view. So he might as well
save his time and not bother repeating himself all the
time.
typed about all of us!!
True, but I would say "lessor" for everyone here, save one. I
mean...just how many of us constantly go off the rails
about...everything...and have been doing so for years?
We all have opinions but we don't generally get too over excited
about them...
If a TV show bothered me to the extent that it seems to bother
some, I just wouldn't watch it anymore. Life is too short...
The True Doctor wrote:
On 29/04/2025 14:11, Blueshirt wrote:
Maybe it's all AI generated?
Instead of Chat-GPT us lucky readers of RADW have AGA-GPT...
And still the woke degenerates refuse to answer clear
questions concerning morality, because they know their
perverted ideology which sanctions the actions of child
molesters cannot be defended.
You say ideology, others might say it's just entertainment.
Do you deny that the lead character was written to sexually
harass other characters by repeatedly calling them 'babes'
despite being told to desist? Do you think that this kind of
behaviour is a suitable example to set to viewers? Do you
think that children should call other children 'babes'? What
do you believe that this kind of behaviour would imply?
Well Babes it's like this... you think there is a sexual element
behind everything about modern "Doctor Who". The reality is it's
very likely it's just a story and the writer writes things they
think sound fun or works within the story. It's a "Doctor Who"
script not a Gospel or a documentary.
You are free to dislike anything about any story but personally
Babes I think you read too much in to everything. Maybe make a
cup of tea for yourself and go for a lay down on the couch...
Do you deny that the lead character suggested that his
companion's mum should be allowed to whistle up his behind?
The direct quote from the episodes is "and your mum can
whistle up my behind". This can easily be found in the iPlayer
recording so anyone can check and confirm it?
Do you not believe that this also constitutes sexual
harassment of the companion and their mother?
No, I think it constitutes what the writer considers humour...
not my kind of humour mind you, as it wouldn't be a phrase we'd
use here. But I don't see it as anything to get worked up over.
If "Doctor Who" bothers you THAT much, switch it off.
Do you think that this kind of disgusting behaviour should be
portrayed on television, especially in a family TV show
directed at children?
Well Babes, you claim nobody is watching "Doctor Who" so who can
get harmed by it?
The only people watching "Doctor Who" are the ones that have
BBC1 on while they do other things around the house, so if that
is the case it doesn't matter what is in the script!
Would you encourage a child you are responsible for to call
others 'babes'?
No Babes. Although maybe my son calls his girlfriend "Babes"
behind closed doors? Maybe my son-in-law uses the term too? Who
knows? I don't ask as I don't care. There are a lot worse words
out there!
Would you encourage a child you are responsible for to suggest
to others that they should whistle up or even at their behinds?
What do you think that engaging in such behaviour would result
in, especially if a female child carried it out towards an
adult male?
Do you think that this kind of behaviour even by an adult,
behaviour which amounts to sexual harassment, and child abuse,
is acceptable?
Stop with the child abuse shit. I know people who have been
fucking abused when they were young... and it wasn't by a
fictional TV show that they could avoid by switching it off!
Do you think the degenerate perverted writers that wrote this
disgusting dialogue and encouraged this kind of disgusting
behaviour should keep their jobs? Do you not think that they
should be sacked? If not why not?
No they shouldn't be sacked. They might end up working on the
next lot of BBC Agatha Christie adaptations... and we
wouldn't want that now Babes, would we?
If you didn't answer each question with the truth then you've
lost the argument.
You want the truth? You can't handle the truth!!!
But if you continue to watch "Doctor Who" every week then you
get what you deserve.
On 29/04/2025 20:32, Blueshirt wrote:
Ironical eh? You are what you criticise!
Ironical that you won't answer clear questions concerning
morality, because you know the perverted woke ideology which
sanctions the actions of child molesters cannot be defended.
Do you deny that the lead character was written to sexually
harass other characters by repeatedly calling them 'babes'
despite being told to desist?
On 29/04/2025 21:18, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
If you didn't answer each question with the truth then
you've lost the argument.
You want the truth? You can't handle the truth!!!
Your truth, the truth of the woke is acting as an apologist
for the indefensible.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 29/04/2025 20:32, Blueshirt wrote:
Ironical eh? You are what you criticise!
Ironical that you won't answer clear questions concerning
morality, because you know the perverted woke ideology which
sanctions the actions of child molesters cannot be defended.
Do you deny that the lead character was written to sexually
harass other characters by repeatedly calling them 'babes'
despite being told to desist?
No, I do not believe that. I also do not believe that any viewer
of a TV show takes the minutia of a script as seriously as you
do. You see things that are not there and trust me, you are in a
minority! A vocal minority obviously, but a minority none the
less. My belief is the majority of people do not continually
watch TV shows that they do not like.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 29/04/2025 21:18, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
If you didn't answer each question with the truth then
you've lost the argument.
You want the truth? You can't handle the truth!!!
Your truth, the truth of the woke is acting as an apologist
for the indefensible.
You definitely need a nice cup of tea... might I recommend a
good Earl Grey? Or is your choice a bit stronger?
You also seem to have had a sense of humour bypass... I'm only
filling time here between the Arsenal game earlier and the Maple
Leafs at midnight. This is only Usenet, not a University debate.
There are no right or wrongs, just opinions.
Lighten up. You'll give yourself high blood pressure.
Daniel70 wrote:
On 29/04/2025 11:16 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
Hornplayer9599 wrote:I suppose, to a greater or lessor extent, the same could be
No, this is typical Aggy methodology. When he's
challenged, and proven wrong repeatedly by everybody, he
repeats the same thing over and over as if that's going to
change anything. Remember the saying, "Insanity is doing
the same thing over and over and expecting a different
result".
The thing is, no matter how often anyone posts any opinion on
Doctor Who, nobody is going to change their point of view
based on some post on Usenet.
Agamemnon has his 'unique' take on the show, which he is
fully entitled to... but no matter how often he bangs on
about perversion and sexual grooming, nobody else is going
to be converted to his point of view. So he might as well
save his time and not bother repeating himself all the time.
typed about all of us!!
Everyone in the whole world probably!
The Doctor wrote:
Blueshirt loves to stoke flames.
Blueshirt likes to do his best to keep RADW alive...when it was
left to you and Tim you had everyone driven away with your
spamming, as that's all you are good for... spamming and
trolling RADW and not contributing to any discussion here
whatsoever, except the odd inane one line comment.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 29/04/2025 14:16, Blueshirt wrote:
Agamemnon has his 'unique' take on the show, which he is
fully entitled to... but no matter how often he bangs on
about perversion and sexual grooming, nobody else is going
to be converted to his point of view. So he might as well
save his time and not bother repeating himself all the time.
And Ukraine should just give up all of it's territory to
Putin, except for the mines which it should give to Trump.
That is the sick degenerate mindset of the woke. That's how
perverts like Huw Edwards and Jimmy Saville were allowed to
carry out their crimes at the BBC with out it batting an
eyelid.
Do you have any favourite subject apart from fighting the woke
Brigade and sexual perversion in the BBC? You know, like
football? Rugby? Jigsaws? Collecting things?
There is more to life yer know! I think you need to get out a
bit more...
The True Doctor wrote:
On 29/04/2025 21:18, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
If you didn't answer each question with the truth then
you've lost the argument.
You want the truth? You can't handle the truth!!!
Your truth, the truth of the woke is acting as an apologist
for the indefensible.
You definitely need a nice cup of tea... might I recommend a
good Earl Grey? Or is your choice a bit stronger?
You also seem to have had a sense of humour bypass... I'm only
filling time here between the Arsenal game earlier and the Maple
Leafs at midnight. This is only Usenet, not a University debate.
There are no right or wrongs, just opinions.
Lighten up. You'll give yourself high blood pressure.
On 4/29/2025 16:49, Blueshirt wrote:
Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 4/29/2025 09:23, Daniel70 wrote:
On 29/04/2025 11:16 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
I suppose, to a greater or lessor extent, the same could be
Agamemnon has his 'unique' take on the show, which he is
fully entitled to... but no matter how often he bangs on
about perversion and sexual grooming, nobody else is going
to be converted to his point of view. So he might as well
save his time and not bother repeating himself all the
time.
typed about all of us!!
True, but I would say "lessor" for everyone here, save one. I
mean...just how many of us constantly go off the rails
about...everything...and have been doing so for years?
We all have opinions but we don't generally get too over excited
about them...
If a TV show bothered me to the extent that it seems to bother
some, I just wouldn't watch it anymore. Life is too short...
Agreed.
If you didn't answer each question with the truth then you've lost the argument.
Chat-GPT likes me
The Doctor wrote:
Blueshirt loves to stoke flames.
Blueshirt likes to do his best to keep RADW alive...when it was
left to you and Tim you had everyone driven away with your
spamming, as that's all you are good for... spamming and
trolling RADW and not contributing to any discussion here
whatsoever, except the odd inane one line comment.
In article <[email protected]>, Blueshirt <[email protected]> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Blueshirt loves to stoke flames.
Blueshirt likes to do his best to keep RADW alive...when it was
left to you and Tim you had everyone driven away with your
spamming, as that's all you are good for... spamming and trolling
RADW and not contributing to any discussion here whatsoever, except
the odd inane one line comment.
So do I.
Blueshirt brought forth:
The True Doctor wrote:
Do you deny that the lead character suggested that his
companion's mum should be allowed to whistle up his behind?
The direct quote from the episodes is "and your mum can
whistle up my behind". This can easily be found in the iPlayer
recording so anyone can check and confirm it?
Do you not believe that this also constitutes sexual
harassment of the companion and their mother?
No, I think it constitutes what the writer considers humour...
not my kind of humour mind you, as it wouldn't be a phrase we'd
use here. But I don't see it as anything to get worked up over.
If "Doctor Who" bothers you THAT much, switch it off.
Personally I thought it was a pun on the phrase “Whistle up the
wind,” only in this case the wind is blowing from his behind. In
other words, Belinda’s musician mother would be playing a tune
while the Doctor accompanies her with Le Pétomane-style musical
farts.
But maybe that’s just me?
--
solar penguin
On 30/04/2025 2:05 am, The True Doctor wrote:
<Snip>
If you didn't answer each question with the truth then you've lost the.... and WHO would adjudicate on IF someone were to "answer each
argument.
question with the truth", Aggy??
YOU!! Don't make me/us laugh.
--
Daniel70
On 30/04/2025 5:26 am, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:CORRECT!!
Blueshirt loves to stoke flames.
Blueshirt likes to do his best to keep RADW alive...when it was
left to you and Tim you had everyone driven away with your
spamming, as that's all you are good for... spamming and
trolling RADW and not contributing to any discussion here
whatsoever, except the odd inane one line comment.
--
Daniel70
On 30/04/2025 9:44 am, The Doctor wrote:^^^^^<-PAedophile talker noted
In article <[email protected]>, BlueshirtYes, Binky, YOU SURE did "you and Tim you had everyone driven away with
<[email protected]> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Blueshirt loves to stoke flames.
Blueshirt likes to do his best to keep RADW alive...when it was
left to you and Tim you had everyone driven away with your
spamming, as that's all you are good for... spamming and trolling
RADW and not contributing to any discussion here whatsoever, except
the odd inane one line comment.
So do I.
your spamming, as that's all you are good for... spamming and trolling
RADW and not contributing to any discussion here whatsoever, except the
odd inane one line comment."!!
--
Daniel70
Daniel70 wrote:^^^^^<-PAedophile talker noted
On 30/04/2025 9:44 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <[email protected]>, BlueshirtYes, Binky, YOU SURE did "you and Tim you had everyone driven away with
<[email protected]> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Blueshirt loves to stoke flames.
Blueshirt likes to do his best to keep RADW alive...when it was left
to you and Tim you had everyone driven away with your spamming, as
that's all you are good for... spamming and trolling
RADW and not contributing to any discussion here whatsoever, except
the odd inane one line comment.
So do I.
your spamming, as that's all you are good for... spamming and trollingso
RADW and not contributing to any discussion here whatsoever, except the
odd inane one line comment."!!
On 30/04/2025 2:05 am, The True Doctor wrote:
<Snip>
If you didn't answer each question with the truth then you've lost the.... and WHO would adjudicate on IF someone were to "answer each
argument.
question with the truth", Aggy??
YOU!! Don't make me/us laugh.
On 29/04/2025 22:56, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
Do you deny that the lead character was written to sexually
harass other characters by repeatedly calling them 'babes'
despite being told to desist?
No, I do not believe that. I also do not believe that any
viewer
This is not a question of belief. It's a question pertaining
to absolute facts.
On 30/04/2025 12:27, Daniel70 wrote:
On 30/04/2025 2:05 am, The True Doctor wrote:
<Snip>
If you didn't answer each question with the truth then
you've lost the argument.
.... and WHO would adjudicate on IF someone were to "answer
each question with the truth", Aggy??
YOU!! Don't make me/us laugh.
The ideal form of absolute truth would adjudicate. Read Plato.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 29/04/2025 22:56, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
Do you deny that the lead character was written to sexually
harass other characters by repeatedly calling them 'babes'
despite being told to desist?
No, I do not believe that. I also do not believe that any
viewer
This is not a question of belief. It's a question pertaining
to absolute facts.
It is only a fact to you... and more so, only an opinion of what
constitutes a fact. You asked me a question. I answered it.
Do you understand free choice? You are free to not watch "Doctor
Who" if you don't like it that much. Others watch it because they
like watching it. They do not watch it be be sexually groomed as
that thought wouldn't even enter their heads. "Doctor Who" is a
TV show, not a party political broadcast on behalf of the Sexual
Perverts Woke Party like you seem to believe. Nobody examines TV
shows the way you do unless they already have an agenda and are
looking to find stuff to moan about.
The problem is, you are moaning to [approx] twenty-five people
here on RADW who generally couldn't give a toss about what you
think as they've heard it all before, many times... that's if
they actually SEE your posts in the first place.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 30/04/2025 12:27, Daniel70 wrote:
On 30/04/2025 2:05 am, The True Doctor wrote:
<Snip>
If you didn't answer each question with the truth then.... and WHO would adjudicate on IF someone were to "answer
you've lost the argument.
each question with the truth", Aggy??
YOU!! Don't make me/us laugh.
The ideal form of absolute truth would adjudicate. Read Plato.
I think you'll find that believing "Doctor Who" is produced by
perverts to sexually groom children is not an absolute truth. In
reality it is just your opinion based on your view of the world
we live in today.
We can all have opinions about life and what we believe is right
or wrong, but our opinions don't mean everybody else has to
agree with that point of view. If things don't concern you, why
do you let them bother you so much? Nobody forces you, or
anyone, to watch "Doctor Who". You say nobody is watching
"Doctor Who" anyway, so what is the issue? If you want to avoid
seeing woke perversion on you computer monitor, switch channelsHow about the BBC takes acting to stop facilitating the agendas of child molesters. Turning a blind eye to their vile obscenities is tantamount
and watch something else or open Steam and play a video game.
On 30/04/2025 20:09, Blueshirt wrote:
We can all have opinions about life and what we believe is
right or wrong, but our opinions don't mean everybody else
has to agree with that point of view. If things don't
concern you, why do you let them bother you so much? Nobody
forces you, or anyone, to watch "Doctor Who". You say nobody
is watching "Doctor Who" anyway, so what is the issue? If
you want to avoid seeing woke perversion on you computer
monitor, switch channels and watch something else or open
Steam and play a video game.
The issue is that perverted monstrosity that replaced Doctor
Who after 2017 is being used to pervert the natural
development and sexually groom children.
How about the BBC takes acting to stop facilitating the
agendas of child molesters. Turning a blind eye to their vile
obscenities is tantamount to condoning them.
Stats for April coming soon.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 30/04/2025 20:09, Blueshirt wrote:
We can all have opinions about life and what we believe is
right or wrong, but our opinions don't mean everybody else
has to agree with that point of view. If things don't
concern you, why do you let them bother you so much? Nobody
forces you, or anyone, to watch "Doctor Who". You say nobody
is watching "Doctor Who" anyway, so what is the issue? If
you want to avoid seeing woke perversion on you computer
monitor, switch channels and watch something else or open
Steam and play a video game.
The issue is that perverted monstrosity that replaced Doctor
Who after 2017 is being used to pervert the natural
development and sexually groom children.
How about the BBC takes acting to stop facilitating the
agendas of child molesters. Turning a blind eye to their vile
obscenities is tantamount to condoning them.
An e-mail to the BBC listing your complaints might get a better
response than a post on RADW...
It's a bit like the boy who cried wolf... if/when you do have a
valid complaint it will still end up in people's killfiles with
the rest of your opinions.
Do the BBC still do "Points of View" or something similar where
its viewers can express their opinions?
The True Doctor wrote:
On 29/04/2025 23:10, Blueshirt wrote:
This is Usenet, not a University debate. There are
no right or wrongs, just opinions.
There is absolute right and absolute wrong. What the
disgusting pervert Russell T Davies is doing is absolute wrong.
In your opinion.
Others think differently. How many people do you see here
agreeing with you? Your opinion is the minority opinion here and
your only real friend is the resident 'village idiot'. That's
how right your are! <rolls eyes>
So there are only opinions about what people deem to be right or
wrong. You have one point of view and [shock, horror] some other
people have a different point of view. It is allowed you know.
We are all different. You don't have to agree with me, I can
live with that... and I'll happily engage with you discussing
things. You OTOH seem to think your opinion is the only one that
counts and you are always right. Breaking news: It isn't, and
you're not!
The True Doctor wrote:
On 29/04/2025 22:56, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
Do you deny that the lead character was written to sexually
harass other characters by repeatedly calling them 'babes'
despite being told to desist?
No, I do not believe that. I also do not believe that any
viewer
This is not a question of belief. It's a question pertaining
to absolute facts.
It is only a fact to you... and more so, only an opinion of what
constitutes a fact. You asked me a question. I answered it.
Do you understand free choice? You are free to not watch "Doctor
Who" if you don't like it that much. Others watch it because they
like watching it. They do not watch it be be sexually groomed as
that thought wouldn't even enter their heads. "Doctor Who" is a
TV show, not a party political broadcast on behalf of the Sexual
Perverts Woke Party like you seem to believe. Nobody examines TV
shows the way you do unless they already have an agenda and are
looking to find stuff to moan about.
The problem is, you are moaning to [approx] twenty-five people
here on RADW who generally couldn't give a toss about what you
think as they've heard it all before, many times... that's if
they actually SEE your posts in the first place.
An e-mail to the BBC listing your complaints might get a better
response than a post on RADW...
The Doctor wrote:
Stats for April coming soon.
Why? What will it prove? It'll just be another [edited - so
meaningless] list of posters here and you will, surprise
surprise, be listed as the top poster on RADW... for the three
hundredth and twenty seventh month running (or whatever).
Whoopee! How exciting... I hope you've your change of underwear
ready.
On 4/30/2025 17:21, Blueshirt wrote:
An e-mail to the BBC listing your complaints might get a better
response than a post on RADW...
I don't think that will end well if he did. There was a time when Aggy
was here ranting and raving about a DOG (Digital Overlay Graphic...we
call them "watermarks" in the US) on one of BBC's channels (BBC 3 I
think...I don't remember, this was a while ago). In Aggy's rants, he
claimed that the DOG was so large that he couldn't watch the channel.
He stated that--instead of just mentally erasing the DOG like people
with intelligence do--he was forced to wrap his screen with tin foil
until he could cover the DOG...which he claimed caused so much of his
screen to be covered in tin foil that only a small patch of screen was >visible.
Aggy then decided to do as you suggest, he emailed the BBC. He copy and >pasted the email he sent here...and guess what? It was written in the
same ranting lunacy that we get here on a regular basis. I'm pretty
sure that the BBC didn't give his email a second thought as they deleted
it. A new email to the BBC listing his complaints probably isn't going
to get any more traction than the last one did.
--
Intelligence is no guarantee against being dead wrong.
--Carl Sagan
On 4/30/2025 17:21, Blueshirt wrote:
An e-mail to the BBC listing your complaints might get a better
response than a post on RADW...
I don't think that will end well if he did. There was a time when Aggy
was here ranting and raving about a DOG (Digital Overlay Graphic...we
call them "watermarks" in the US) on one of BBC's channels (BBC 3 I
think...I don't remember, this was a while ago). In Aggy's rants, he claimed that the DOG was so large that he couldn't watch the channel. He stated that--instead of just mentally erasing the DOG like people with intelligence do--he was forced to wrap his screen with tin foil until he could cover the DOG...which he claimed caused so much of his screen to
be covered in tin foil that only a small patch of screen was visible.
Aggy then decided to do as you suggest, he emailed the BBC. He copy and pasted the email he sent here...and guess what? It was written in the
same ranting lunacy that we get here on a regular basis. I'm pretty
sure that the BBC didn't give his email a second thought as they deleted it. A new email to the BBC listing his complaints probably isn't going
to get any more traction than the last one did.
On 01/05/2025 02:07, Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 4/30/2025 17:21, Blueshirt wrote:
An e-mail to the BBC listing your complaints might get a better
response than a post on RADW...
I don't think that will end well if he did. There was a time when Aggy
was here ranting and raving about a DOG (Digital Overlay Graphic...we
call them "watermarks" in the US) on one of BBC's channels (BBC 3 I
think...I don't remember, this was a while ago). In Aggy's rants, he
claimed that the DOG was so large that he couldn't watch the channel. He
stated that--instead of just mentally erasing the DOG like people with
intelligence do--he was forced to wrap his screen with tin foil until he
could cover the DOG...which he claimed caused so much of his screen to
be covered in tin foil that only a small patch of screen was visible.
Aggy then decided to do as you suggest, he emailed the BBC. He copy and
pasted the email he sent here...and guess what? It was written in the
same ranting lunacy that we get here on a regular basis. I'm pretty
sure that the BBC didn't give his email a second thought as they deleted
it. A new email to the BBC listing his complaints probably isn't going
to get any more traction than the last one did.
I wasn't the only one complaining about the huge revolting pink DOG that
was plastered over my screen that was brighter than the sun. Almost
everyone else that watched Torchwood complained to and the BBC was force
to reduce the size and dim it down.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
In article <vuunoo$1opm2$[email protected]>,
The True Doctor <[email protected]_SPAM> wrote:
On 01/05/2025 02:07, Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 4/30/2025 17:21, Blueshirt wrote:
An e-mail to the BBC listing your complaints might get a better
response than a post on RADW...
I don't think that will end well if he did. There was a time when Aggy >>> was here ranting and raving about a DOG (Digital Overlay Graphic...we
call them "watermarks" in the US) on one of BBC's channels (BBC 3 I
think...I don't remember, this was a while ago). In Aggy's rants, he >>> claimed that the DOG was so large that he couldn't watch the channel. He >>> stated that--instead of just mentally erasing the DOG like people with
intelligence do--he was forced to wrap his screen with tin foil until he >>> could cover the DOG...which he claimed caused so much of his screen to
be covered in tin foil that only a small patch of screen was visible.
Aggy then decided to do as you suggest, he emailed the BBC. He copy and >>> pasted the email he sent here...and guess what? It was written in the >>> same ranting lunacy that we get here on a regular basis. I'm pretty
sure that the BBC didn't give his email a second thought as they deleted >>> it. A new email to the BBC listing his complaints probably isn't going >>> to get any more traction than the last one did.
I wasn't the only one complaining about the huge revolting pink DOG that
was plastered over my screen that was brighter than the sun. Almost
everyone else that watched Torchwood complained to and the BBC was force
to reduce the size and dim it down.
with chibnall in charge of TW S!, he should have taken charge of DW!
In article <vut1n7$66op$[email protected]>,
Daniel70 <[email protected]> wrote:
On 30/04/2025 9:44 am, The Doctor wrote:^^^^^<-PAedophile talker noted
In article <[email protected]>, BlueshirtYes, Binky, YOU SURE did "you and Tim you had everyone driven away with
<[email protected]> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Blueshirt loves to stoke flames.
Blueshirt likes to do his best to keep RADW alive...when it was
left to you and Tim you had everyone driven away with your
spamming, as that's all you are good for... spamming and trolling
RADW and not contributing to any discussion here whatsoever, except
the odd inane one line comment.
So do I.
your spamming, as that's all you are good for... spamming and trolling
RADW and not contributing to any discussion here whatsoever, except the
odd inane one line comment."!!
But Tim is no longer here, like the rest of the Gogole Trolls.
On 1/05/2025 9:38 pm, The Doctor wrote:^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
In article <vuunoo$1opm2$[email protected]>,
The True Doctor <[email protected]_SPAM> wrote:
On 01/05/2025 02:07, Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 4/30/2025 17:21, Blueshirt wrote:
An e-mail to the BBC listing your complaints might get a better
response than a post on RADW...
I don't think that will end well if he did. There was a time when Aggy >>>> was here ranting and raving about a DOG (Digital Overlay Graphic...we
call them "watermarks" in the US) on one of BBC's channels (BBC 3 I
think...I don't remember, this was a while ago). In Aggy's rants, he >>>> claimed that the DOG was so large that he couldn't watch the channel. He >>>> stated that--instead of just mentally erasing the DOG like people with >>>> intelligence do--he was forced to wrap his screen with tin foil until he >>>> could cover the DOG...which he claimed caused so much of his screen to >>>> be covered in tin foil that only a small patch of screen was visible.
Aggy then decided to do as you suggest, he emailed the BBC. He copy and
pasted the email he sent here...and guess what? It was written in the >>>> same ranting lunacy that we get here on a regular basis. I'm pretty >>>> sure that the BBC didn't give his email a second thought as they deleted >>>> it. A new email to the BBC listing his complaints probably isn't going >>>> to get any more traction than the last one did.
I wasn't the only one complaining about the huge revolting pink DOG that >>> was plastered over my screen that was brighter than the sun. Almost
everyone else that watched Torchwood complained to and the BBC was force >>> to reduce the size and dim it down.
with chibnall in charge of TW S!, he should have taken charge of DW!
Sorry!! WHAT?? Sorry to inform YOU, Binky, but Chris Chibnall DID TAKE
OVER "Doctor Who", Binky.^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
Is YOUR memory failing YOU, Binky??^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
--
Daniel70
There is absolute right and absolute wrong. What the disgusting pervert Russell T Davies is doing is absolute wrong.
On 4/30/2025 17:21, Blueshirt wrote:
An e-mail to the BBC listing your complaints might get a
better response than a post on RADW...
I don't think that will end well if he did. There was a time
when Aggy was here ranting and raving about a DOG (Digital
Overlay Graphic...we call them "watermarks" in the US) on one
of BBC's channels (BBC 3 I think...I don't remember, this was
a while ago).
On 30/04/2025 19:42, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
There is absolute right and absolute wrong. What the
disgusting pervert Russell T Davies is doing is absolute
wrong.
In your opinion.
Others think differently. How many people do you see here
agreeing with you? Your opinion is the minority opinion here
and your only real friend is the resident 'village idiot'.
That's how right your are! <rolls eyes>
So there are only opinions about what people deem to be
right or wrong. You have one point of view and [shock,
horror] some other people have a different point of view. It
is allowed you know. We are all different. You don't have
to agree with me, I can live with that... and I'll happily
engage with you discussing things. You OTOH seem to think
your opinion is the only one that counts and you are always
right. Breaking news: It isn't, and you're not!
Do you think it is right to sexually harass someone?
Do you think it is right to sexually harass them in order to
force them to accept your authority?
Do you think it is right to continue to sexually harass them
when they ask you to stop harassing them and then start
systematically bullying them an double, triple, and quadruple
down you your sexual harassment?
What example do you think this sets to young children?
One plus One equals Two .... absolutely right i.e. FACT
One plus Two equals Three .... absolutely right i.e. FACT
Night follows Day follows Night ..... absolutely right i.e.
FACT
Today was a beautiful Day ..... may or may not be correct ....
DEPENDING ON VIEWPOINT!! So NOT a FACT.
On 30/04/2025 9:02 am, The True Doctor wrote:
<Snip>
There is absolute right and absolute wrong. What the disgustingOne plus One equals Two .... absolutely right i.e. *FACT*
pervert Russell T Davies is doing is absolute wrong.
One plus Two equals Three .... absolutely right i.e. *FACT*
Night follows Day follows Night ..... absolutely right i.e. *FACT*
Today was a beautiful Day ..... may or may not be correct .... DEPENDING
ON VIEWPOINT!! So *NOT* a FACT.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 30/04/2025 19:42, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
There is absolute right and absolute wrong. What the
disgusting pervert Russell T Davies is doing is absolute
wrong.
In your opinion.
Others think differently. How many people do you see here
agreeing with you? Your opinion is the minority opinion here
and your only real friend is the resident 'village idiot'.
That's how right your are! <rolls eyes>
So there are only opinions about what people deem to be
right or wrong. You have one point of view and [shock,
horror] some other people have a different point of view. It
is allowed you know. We are all different. You don't have
to agree with me, I can live with that... and I'll happily
engage with you discussing things. You OTOH seem to think
your opinion is the only one that counts and you are always
right. Breaking news: It isn't, and you're not!
Do you think it is right to sexually harass someone?
Do you think it is right to sexually harass them in order to
force them to accept your authority?
Do you think it is right to continue to sexually harass them
when they ask you to stop harassing them and then start
systematically bullying them an double, triple, and quadruple
down you your sexual harassment?
What example do you think this sets to young children?
Doctor Who IS A TV SHOW - not a documentary series about real
life.
Your opinion is based on your view of the world, which may or
may not be correct, but either way it is an opinion that few
here seem to share.
You [continually] saying that the 15th Doctor was sexually
harassing someone and/or bullying them, doesn't make it a fact
that he was. It was just lines in a script that the writer(s)
thought worked for that scene. Ncuti Gatwa was ACTING.
Continually saying that RTD is a pervert is also your opinion,
which again, may be right or wrong. It's not five and five
equals ten.
How can you know what RTD is or isn't? But
regardless of what people think of RTD, nobody seriously
believes that he produces Doctor Who to sexually groom children.
Nobody is watching Doctor Who anyway so in the big scheme ofNobody is watching this sick perverted pile of shit except maybe
things it's all irrelevant surely? So why do you get so worked
up over it?
On 30/04/2025 9:02 am, The True Doctor wrote:
<Snip>
There is absolute right and absolute wrong. What the disgusting pervertOne plus One equals Two .... absolutely right i.e. *FACT*
Russell T Davies is doing is absolute wrong.
One plus Two equals Three .... absolutely right i.e. *FACT*
Night follows Day follows Night ..... absolutely right i.e. *FACT*
Today was a beautiful Day ..... may or may not be correct .... DEPENDING
ON VIEWPOINT!! So *NOT* a FACT.
--
Daniel70
Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 4/30/2025 17:21, Blueshirt wrote:
An e-mail to the BBC listing your complaints might get a
better response than a post on RADW...
I don't think that will end well if he did. There was a time
when Aggy was here ranting and raving about a DOG (Digital
Overlay Graphic...we call them "watermarks" in the US) on one
of BBC's channels (BBC 3 I think...I don't remember, this was
a while ago).
I do remember the moaning here and on other NG's about DOG's on
tv screens, usually channel identity logos. That and shrinking
credits were an issue for some people on quite a few groups that
covered television TV shows many years ago. As I had come back
from New York where anything goes in regards to water-marks,
logos, show previews and advert strips on parts of television
screens. (Even adverts during live sports games!) I never saw it
as a big issue... a bit annoying but easily ignored. However, it
was a new-ish thing for British television at the time.
Daniel70 wrote:
One plus One equals Two .... absolutely right i.e. FACT
One plus Two equals Three .... absolutely right i.e. FACT
Night follows Day follows Night ..... absolutely right i.e.
FACT
Today was a beautiful Day ..... may or may not be correct ....
DEPENDING ON VIEWPOINT!! So NOT a FACT.
On RADW:
Anything Agamemnon posts ... absolutely right i.e. fact... even
though it may not be correct.
Anything anyone else posts... absolutely not right i.e. wrong...
even though it may be correct.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 30/04/2025 19:42, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
There is absolute right and absolute wrong. What the
disgusting pervert Russell T Davies is doing is absolute
wrong.
In your opinion.
Others think differently. How many people do you see here
agreeing with you? Your opinion is the minority opinion here
and your only real friend is the resident 'village idiot'.
That's how right your are! <rolls eyes>
So there are only opinions about what people deem to be
right or wrong. You have one point of view and [shock,
horror] some other people have a different point of view. It
is allowed you know. We are all different. You don't have
to agree with me, I can live with that... and I'll happily
engage with you discussing things. You OTOH seem to think
your opinion is the only one that counts and you are always
right. Breaking news: It isn't, and you're not!
Do you think it is right to sexually harass someone?
Do you think it is right to sexually harass them in order to
force them to accept your authority?
Do you think it is right to continue to sexually harass them
when they ask you to stop harassing them and then start
systematically bullying them an double, triple, and quadruple
down you your sexual harassment?
What example do you think this sets to young children?
Doctor Who IS A TV SHOW - not a documentary series about real
life.
Your opinion is based on your view of the world, which may or
may not be correct, but either way it is an opinion that few
here seem to share.
You [continually] saying that the 15th Doctor was sexually
harassing someone and/or bullying them, doesn't make it a fact
that he was. It was just lines in a script that the writer(s)
thought worked for that scene. Ncuti Gatwa was ACTING.
Continually saying that RTD is a pervert is also your opinion,
which again, may be right or wrong. It's not five and five
equals ten. How can you know what RTD is or isn't? But
regardless of what people think of RTD, nobody seriously
believes that he produces Doctor Who to sexually groom children.
Nobody is watching Doctor Who anyway so in the big scheme of
things it's all irrelevant surely? So why do you get so worked
up over it?
In article <[email protected]>,
Blueshirt <[email protected]> wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
One plus One equals Two .... absolutely right i.e. FACT
One plus Two equals Three .... absolutely right i.e. FACT
Night follows Day follows Night ..... absolutely right i.e.
FACT
Today was a beautiful Day ..... may or may not be correct
... DEPENDING ON VIEWPOINT!! So NOT a FACT.
On RADW:
Anything Agamemnon posts ... absolutely right i.e. fact...
even though it may not be correct.
Anything anyone else posts... absolutely not right i.e.
wrong... even though it may be correct.
Flame stoking noted.
In article <[email protected]>,
Blueshirt <[email protected]> wrote:
I do remember the moaning here and on other NG's about DOG's
on tv screens, usually channel identity logos. That and
shrinking credits were an issue for some people on quite a
few groups that covered television shows many years ago.
As I had come back from New York where anything goes in
regards to water-marks, logos, show previews and advert
strips on parts of television screens. (Even adverts during
live sports games!) I never saw it as a big issue... a bit
annoying but easily ignored. However, it was a new-ish thing
for British television at the time.
some things do not change.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <[email protected]>,
Blueshirt <[email protected]> wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
One plus One equals Two .... absolutely right i.e. FACT
One plus Two equals Three .... absolutely right i.e. FACT
Night follows Day follows Night ..... absolutely right i.e.
FACT
Today was a beautiful Day ..... may or may not be correct
... DEPENDING ON VIEWPOINT!! So NOT a FACT.
On RADW:
Anything Agamemnon posts ... absolutely right i.e. fact...
even though it may not be correct.
Anything anyone else posts... absolutely not right i.e.
wrong... even though it may be correct.
Flame stoking noted.
Oh, I forgot...
Anything Dave Yadallee posts ... absolute gobbledygook i.e.
nonsense... and rarely correct.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <[email protected]>,
Blueshirt <[email protected]> wrote:
I do remember the moaning here and on other NG's about DOG's
on tv screens, usually channel identity logos. That and
shrinking credits were an issue for some people on quite a
few groups that covered television shows many years ago.
As I had come back from New York where anything goes in
regards to water-marks, logos, show previews and advert
strips on parts of television screens. (Even adverts during
live sports games!) I never saw it as a big issue... a bit
annoying but easily ignored. However, it was a new-ish thing
for British television at the time.
some things do not change.
Irish and British TV is still quite tame compared to all the
s*t that the US shows have plastered across their screens during
programmes over there. - Especially live sports.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 716 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 52:48:21 |
| Calls: | 12,115 |
| Calls today: | 6 |
| Files: | 15,010 |
| Messages: | 6,518,594 |
| Posted today: | 1 |