On 28/01/2025 1:31 am, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 27/01/2025 3:03 am, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:DoctorBill ... White ... Start to Finish!!
Melody Pond a.k.a. River Song "black"?? Really??
Yes, Melody Pond at one stage had black skin...
Surely you knew that Time Lords can change their skin colour?
Have you been living in a cave?!
DoctorPat .... White ... Start to Finish!!
DoctorJon .... White ... Start to Finish!!
DoctorTom .... White ... Start to Finish!!
DoctorPeter .. White ... Start to Finish!!
DoctorColin .. White ... Start to Finish!!
DoctorPaul ... White ... Start to Finish!!
DoctorDavid .. White ... Start to Finish!!
DoctorMatt ... White ... Start to Finish!!
DoctorPeter .. White ... Start to Finish!!
JodieDoctor .. White ... Start to Finish!!
All The Doctors that I've seen have been White .... and I
don't recall ANY of them changing their Skin Colour.
1) Melody Pond isn't the Doctor.
Correct! Who ever suggested she was?? But it might be that she was
Conceived with-in The TARDIS .... whilst with-in The Timestream, maybe
.... so has/had some TimeLord capabilities!!
2) The fact that the current Doctor has a different skin colour
to the ones you list (Doctor Who fans love lists don't they?)
clearly means your point is irrelevant.
I haven't seen him (??) .... so, therefore, He doesn't exist.
You guys have all just experienced a Group Hallucination!!
That's my story ....
3) Just because you haven't seen (or remembered) something from
a Doctor Who episode doesn't mean that it didn't happen!
4) There is no No.4... but lists are cool.
Sorry! What's wrong with DoctorTom ... who's 90th Birthday we have just
seen posts about.
Daniel70Maybe DoctorNcuti has that ability .... but I wouldn't know!!
;-P
We might get to find out at the beginning of S3/16!
Well, the people who get to watch the show anyway... ;-)
--
On 28/01/2025 8:41 am, Your Name wrote:
On 2025-01-27 11:51:19 +0000, Daniel70 said:WOW!! Haven't you got something really worthwhile to be doing, Your
On 27/01/2025 11:26 am, The Doctor wrote:
<Snip>
Adam is suffering from serious midrot."midrot"?? Is that rot of the Stomach or something??
According to Mr Google, midrot is a word in the Dragon Language for the
game series "The Elder Scrolls" ...
Midrot: n. loyalty; oath, vow; sworn word
<https://www.thuum.org/word.php?w=964>
So that must mean Adam has seriously loyalty, presumably to Doctor Who.
;-)
Name?? ;-P
--
Daniel70
Daniel70 wrote:
On 28/01/2025 7:07 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
BEFORE!!
[Snip]
Nobody has mentioned the Fugitive Doctor yet either. So, in
the spirit of Daniel;
DoctorJo ... Black ... Start to Finish!!
But where does she go on our list? Before "DoctorBill" or
around "DoctorJodie"?
Before DoctorBill? BEFORE?!!! Cough...splutter... steady on
there old chap, are you trying to imply that there are
pre-Hartnell Doctors? <shocked face>
You do know that you will awaken 'the beast' with outrageous
statements like that don't you?
Repeat after me... there are no pre-Hartnell Doctors! (Even if
the TV show implies that there were.) It's just another one of
our group hallucinations. We have never seen them.
Daniel70 wrote:
On 28/01/2025 1:31 am, Blueshirt wrote:
1) Melody Pond isn't the Doctor.
Correct! Who ever suggested she was?? But it might be that she
was Conceived with-in The TARDIS .... whilst with-in The
Timestream, maybe .... so has/had some TimeLord capabilities!!
Changing her skin colour being one of them obviously!
2) The fact that the current Doctor has a different skin
colour to the ones you list (Doctor Who fans love lists
don't they?) clearly means your point is irrelevant.
I haven't seen him (??) .... so, therefore, He doesn't exist.
I'm sure there's quite a few people in fandom that wished
Ncuti's Doctor didn't exist.
3) Just because you haven't seen (or remembered) something
from a Doctor Who episode doesn't mean that it didn't happen!
You guys have all just experienced a Group Hallucination!!
That's my story ....
If only some of his non-fans could just put it down to a
hallucination and move on this would be a much quieter place.
Spot on!4) There is no No.4... but lists are cool.
Sorry! What's wrong with DoctorTom ... who's 90th Birthday we
have just seen posts about.
I think you'll find it was his 91st birthday we just celebrated,
so you've lost a year somewhere!!!
:-)
On 28/01/2025 10:35 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 28/01/2025 7:07 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
BEFORE!!
[Snip]
Nobody has mentioned the Fugitive Doctor yet either. So, in
the spirit of Daniel;
DoctorJo ... Black ... Start to Finish!!
But where does she go on our list? Before "DoctorBill" or
around "DoctorJodie"?
Before DoctorBill? BEFORE?!!! Cough...splutter... steady on
there old chap, are you trying to imply that there are
pre-Hartnell Doctors? <shocked face>
But!! But!! But my T.V. tells me so!! ;-P
You do know that you will awaken 'the beast' with outrageous
statements like that don't you?
A bit of extra (On Topic) posting around here could be nice!
Repeat after me... there are no pre-Hartnell Doctors! (Even ifBut .... NO!! I can't!! My EYEs don't deceive me!! I HAVE SEEN,
the TV show implies that there were.) It's just another one of
our group hallucinations. We have never seen them.
THEREFORE .....
--
Daniel70
On 28/01/2025 10:35 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 28/01/2025 7:07 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
[Snip]
Nobody has mentioned the Fugitive Doctor yet either. So,
in the spirit of Daniel;
DoctorJo ... Black ... Start to Finish!!
But where does she go on our list? Before "DoctorBill" or
around "DoctorJodie"?
BEFORE!!
Before DoctorBill? BEFORE?!!! Cough...splutter... steady on
there old chap, are you trying to imply that there are
pre-Hartnell Doctors? <shocked face>
But!! But!! But my T.V. tells me so!! ;-P
You do know that you will awaken 'the beast' with outrageous
statements like that don't you?
A bit of extra (On Topic) posting around here could be nice!
Repeat after me... there are no pre-Hartnell Doctors! (Even
if the TV show implies that there were.) It's just another
one of our group hallucinations. We have never seen them.
But .... NO!! I can't!! My EYEs don't deceive me!! I HAVE
SEEN, THEREFORE .....
On 28/01/2025 8:41 am, Your Name wrote:
On 2025-01-27 11:51:19 +0000, Daniel70 said:
On 27/01/2025 11:26 am, The Doctor wrote:
<Snip>
Adam is suffering from serious midrot."midrot"?? Is that rot of the Stomach or something??
According to Mr Google, midrot is a word in the Dragon Language for the
game series "The Elder Scrolls" ...
�� Midrot: n. loyalty; oath, vow; sworn word
�� <https://www.thuum.org/word.php?w=964>
So that must mean Adam has seriously loyalty, presumably to Doctor Who. ;-)
WOW!! Haven't you got something really worthwhile to be doing, Your Name?? ;-P
On 28/01/2025 8:44 am, Your Name wrote:
On 2025-01-27 11:40:57 +0000, Daniel70 said:
<Snip>
All The Doctors that I've seen have been White .... and I don't recall
ANY of them changing their Skin Colour.
Technically, I have seen one or two of them turn red when embarassed,
and possibly even green when feeling sick.� ;-)
What!! TARDIS travelers getting a bit green around the gills!!
Do we need to change the TimeSTREAM into the TimeSEA so they can be SEA sick?? ;-P
On 2025-01-28 11:09:27 +0000, Daniel70 said:
On 28/01/2025 8:41 am, Your Name wrote:
On 2025-01-27 11:51:19 +0000, Daniel70 said:
On 27/01/2025 11:26 am, The Doctor wrote:
<Snip>
Adam is suffering from serious midrot."midrot"?? Is that rot of the Stomach or something??
According to Mr Google, midrot is a word in the Dragon Language for the
game series "The Elder Scrolls" ...
�� Midrot: n. loyalty; oath, vow; sworn word
�� <https://www.thuum.org/word.php?w=964>
So that must mean Adam has seriously loyalty, presumably to Doctor Who. ;-)
WOW!! Haven't you got something really worthwhile to be doing, Your Name?? ;-P
Nope. I was filling in a few minutes before dinner was ready. :-)
Daniel70 wrote:
On 28/01/2025 10:35 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 28/01/2025 7:07 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
BEFORE!!
[Snip]
Nobody has mentioned the Fugitive Doctor yet either. So,
in the spirit of Daniel;
DoctorJo ... Black ... Start to Finish!!
But where does she go on our list? Before "DoctorBill" or
around "DoctorJodie"?
Before DoctorBill? BEFORE?!!! Cough...splutter... steady on
there old chap, are you trying to imply that there are
pre-Hartnell Doctors? <shocked face>
But!! But!! But my T.V. tells me so!! ;-P
You do know that you will awaken 'the beast' with outrageous
statements like that don't you?
A bit of extra (On Topic) posting around here could be nice!
Be careful what you wish for!
Repeat after me... there are no pre-Hartnell Doctors! (EvenBut .... NO!! I can't!! My EYEs don't deceive me!! I HAVE
if the TV show implies that there were.) It's just another
one of our group hallucinations. We have never seen them.
SEEN, THEREFORE .....
But... what if Ncuti's Doctor steps out of the shower [naked and
crying obviously] and it turns out that DoctorJo - aka the
Fugitive Doctor - was just part of a bad dream? What then?
In article <tq5EiOBWyJmnFwAB@jhall_nospamxx.co.uk>,
John Hall <[email protected]> wrote:
In message <vn8u45$18ghe$[email protected]>, Your Name
<[email protected]> writes
If some of the people using that newsgroup don't like Doctor Who (or
whatever show) posted there, then that's their problem. I don't like
90% of the shows they post about either, but they're certainly allowed
to post about them and they are far more on topic than all the silly
political posts that infest rec.arts.tv
Never having followed rec.arts.tv, I couldn't comment on that.
Well it should encompass DW!
Daniel70 wrote:
On 28/01/2025 10:35 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 28/01/2025 7:07 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
BEFORE!!
[Snip]
Nobody has mentioned the Fugitive Doctor yet either. So,
in the spirit of Daniel;
DoctorJo ... Black ... Start to Finish!!
But where does she go on our list? Before "DoctorBill" or
around "DoctorJodie"?
Before DoctorBill? BEFORE?!!! Cough...splutter... steady on
there old chap, are you trying to imply that there are
pre-Hartnell Doctors? <shocked face>
But!! But!! But my T.V. tells me so!! ;-P
You do know that you will awaken 'the beast' with outrageous
statements like that don't you?
A bit of extra (On Topic) posting around here could be nice!
Be careful what you wish for!
Repeat after me... there are no pre-Hartnell Doctors! (EvenBut .... NO!! I can't!! My EYEs don't deceive me!! I HAVE
if the TV show implies that there were.) It's just another
one of our group hallucinations. We have never seen them.
SEEN, THEREFORE .....
But... what if Ncuti's Doctor steps out of the shower [naked and
crying obviously] and it turns out that DoctorJo - aka the
Fugitive Doctor - was just part of a bad dream? What then?
In article <vnacoc$1pagn$[email protected]>,
Daniel70 <[email protected]> wrote:
On 27/01/2025 10:43 pm, Daniel70 wrote:
On 27/01/2025 10:40 pm, Daniel70 wrote:
On 27/01/2025 3:03 am, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:DoctorBill ... White ... Start to Finish!!
On 12/01/2025 3:45 pm, Your Name wrote:
Near bottom of first column ... "Young Melody was black while
Amy J Williams obituary: <https://i.imgur.com/H4aG24S.jpeg>
her adoptive parents were white"??
Melody Pond a.k.a. River Song "black"?? Really??
Yes, Melody Pond at one stage had black skin...
Surely you knew that Time Lords can change their skin colour?
Have you been living in a cave?!
DoctorPat .... White ... Start to Finish!!
DoctorJon .... White ... Start to Finish!!
DoctorTom .... White ... Start to Finish!!
DoctorPeter .. White ... Start to Finish!!
DoctorColin .. White ... Start to Finish!!
DoctorPaul ... White ... Start to Finish!!
DoctorDavid .. White ... Start to Finish!!
DoctorMatt ... White ... Start to Finish!!
DoctorPeter .. White ... Start to Finish!!
JodieDoctor .. White ... Start to Finish!!
All The Doctors that I've seen have been White .... and I don't recall >>>> ANY of them changing their Skin Colour.
Maybe DoctorNcuti has that ability .... but I wouldn't know!! ;-P
Opps forgot ....
DoctorChris .. White ... Start to Finish!!
Opps!! Opps'er!! I also forgot ....
DoctorSly .... White ... Start to Finish!!
Noted!
On 29/01/2025 2:45 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <tq5EiOBWyJmnFwAB@jhall_nospamxx.co.uk>,
John Hall <[email protected]> wrote:
In message <vn8u45$18ghe$[email protected]>, Your Name
<[email protected]> writes
<Snip>
If some of the people using that newsgroup don't like
Doctor Who (or whatever show) posted there, then that's
their problem. I don't like 90% of the shows they post
about either, but they're certainly allowed to post
about them and they are far more on topic than all the
silly political posts that infest rec.arts.tv
Never having followed rec.arts.tv, I couldn't comment on
that.
Well it should encompass DW!
I would tend to disagree .... rec.arts.tv should be the group
for ALL T.V. shows for which there isn't a more specific
newsgroup.
Doctor Who has specific newsgroups, so there shouldn't, as a
normal thing, be posts about Doctor Who in rec.arts.tv.
Startrek has specific newsgroups, so there shouldn't, as a
normal thing, be posts about Startrek in rec.arts.tv.
Babylon5 has specific newsgroups, so there shouldn't, as a
normal thing, be posts about Babylon5 in rec.arts.tv.
Etc., Etc., Etc..
On 29/01/2025 2:46 am, The Doctor wrote:^^^^^<-PAedophile talker noted
In article <vnacoc$1pagn$[email protected]>,
Daniel70 <[email protected]> wrote:
On 27/01/2025 10:43 pm, Daniel70 wrote:
On 27/01/2025 10:40 pm, Daniel70 wrote:
On 27/01/2025 3:03 am, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:DoctorBill ... White ... Start to Finish!!
On 12/01/2025 3:45 pm, Your Name wrote:
Near bottom of first column ... "Young Melody was black while
Amy J Williams obituary: <https://i.imgur.com/H4aG24S.jpeg>
her adoptive parents were white"??
Melody Pond a.k.a. River Song "black"?? Really??
Yes, Melody Pond at one stage had black skin...
Surely you knew that Time Lords can change their skin colour?
Have you been living in a cave?!
DoctorPat .... White ... Start to Finish!!
DoctorJon .... White ... Start to Finish!!
DoctorTom .... White ... Start to Finish!!
DoctorPeter .. White ... Start to Finish!!
DoctorColin .. White ... Start to Finish!!
DoctorPaul ... White ... Start to Finish!!
DoctorDavid .. White ... Start to Finish!!
DoctorMatt ... White ... Start to Finish!!
DoctorPeter .. White ... Start to Finish!!
JodieDoctor .. White ... Start to Finish!!
All The Doctors that I've seen have been White .... and I don't recall >>>>> ANY of them changing their Skin Colour.
Maybe DoctorNcuti has that ability .... but I wouldn't know!! ;-P
Opps forgot ....
DoctorChris .. White ... Start to Finish!!
Opps!! Opps'er!! I also forgot ....
DoctorSly .... White ... Start to Finish!!
Noted!
But WHY, oh, Why didn't YOU, Binky, notice it first time around ..... I
mean YOU, Binky do call YOURSELF *The Doctor* No one else does!!^^^^^<-PAedophile talker noted
--
Daniel70
On 29/01/2025 2:45 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <tq5EiOBWyJmnFwAB@jhall_nospamxx.co.uk>,
John Hall <[email protected]> wrote:
In message <vn8u45$18ghe$[email protected]>, Your Name
<[email protected]> writes
<Snip>
If some of the people using that newsgroup don't like Doctor Who (or
whatever show) posted there, then that's their problem. I don't like
90% of the shows they post about either, but they're certainly allowed >>>> to post about them and they are far more on topic than all the silly
political posts that infest rec.arts.tv
Never having followed rec.arts.tv, I couldn't comment on that.
Well it should encompass DW!
I would tend to disagree .... rec.arts.tv should be the group for ALL
T.V. shows for which there isn't a more specific newsgroup.
Doctor Who has specific newsgroups, so there shouldn't, as a normal
thing, be posts about Doctor Who in rec.arts.tv.
Startrek has specific newsgroups, so there shouldn't, as a normal thing,
be posts about Startrek in rec.arts.tv.
Babylon5 has specific newsgroups, so there shouldn't, as a normal thing,
be posts about Babylon5 in rec.arts.tv.
Etc., Etc., Etc..
--
Daniel70
Daniel70 wrote:
On 29/01/2025 2:45 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <tq5EiOBWyJmnFwAB@jhall_nospamxx.co.uk>,
John Hall <[email protected]> wrote:
In message <vn8u45$18ghe$[email protected]>, Your Name
<[email protected]> writes
<Snip>
If some of the people using that newsgroup don't like
Doctor Who (or whatever show) posted there, then that's
their problem. I don't like 90% of the shows they post
about either, but they're certainly allowed to post
about them and they are far more on topic than all the
silly political posts that infest rec.arts.tv
Never having followed rec.arts.tv, I couldn't comment on
that.
Well it should encompass DW!
I would tend to disagree .... rec.arts.tv should be the group
for ALL T.V. shows for which there isn't a more specific
newsgroup.
Doctor Who has specific newsgroups, so there shouldn't, as a
normal thing, be posts about Doctor Who in rec.arts.tv.
Startrek has specific newsgroups, so there shouldn't, as a
normal thing, be posts about Startrek in rec.arts.tv.
Babylon5 has specific newsgroups, so there shouldn't, as a
normal thing, be posts about Babylon5 in rec.arts.tv.
Etc., Etc., Etc..
And there's a logical argument from the other point of view...
See Adam, that's how discussions are supposed to go!
On 29/01/2025 2:45 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <tq5EiOBWyJmnFwAB@jhall_nospamxx.co.uk>,
John Hall <[email protected]> wrote:
In message <vn8u45$18ghe$[email protected]>, Your Name
<[email protected]> writes
<Snip>
If some of the people using that newsgroup don't like Doctor Who (or
whatever show) posted there, then that's their problem. I don't like
90% of the shows they post about either, but they're certainly allowed >>>> to post about them and they are far more on topic than all the silly
political posts that infest rec.arts.tv
Never having followed rec.arts.tv, I couldn't comment on that.
Well it should encompass DW!
I would tend to disagree .... rec.arts.tv should be the group for ALL
T.V. shows for which there isn't a more specific newsgroup.
Doctor Who has specific newsgroups, so there shouldn't, as a normal
thing, be posts about Doctor Who in rec.arts.tv.
Startrek has specific newsgroups, so there shouldn't, as a normal
thing, be posts about Startrek in rec.arts.tv.
Babylon5 has specific newsgroups, so there shouldn't, as a normal
thing, be posts about Babylon5 in rec.arts.tv.
Etc., Etc., Etc..
On 2025-01-29 12:44:08 +0000, Daniel70 said:
On 29/01/2025 2:45 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <tq5EiOBWyJmnFwAB@jhall_nospamxx.co.uk>,
John Hall <[email protected]> wrote:
In message <vn8u45$18ghe$[email protected]>, Your Name
<[email protected]> writes
<Snip>
If some of the people using that newsgroup don't like Doctor Who (or >>>>> whatever show) posted there, then that's their problem. I don't like >>>>> 90% of the shows they post about either, but they're certainly allowed >>>>> to post about them and they are far more on topic than all the silly >>>>> political posts that infest rec.arts.tv
Never having followed rec.arts.tv, I couldn't comment on that.
Well it should encompass DW!
I would tend to disagree .... rec.arts.tv should be the group for ALL
T.V. shows for which there isn't a more specific newsgroup.
Doctor Who has specific newsgroups, so there shouldn't, as a normal
thing, be posts about Doctor Who in rec.arts.tv.
Startrek has specific newsgroups, so there shouldn't, as a normal
thing, be posts about Startrek in rec.arts.tv.
Babylon5 has specific newsgroups, so there shouldn't, as a normal
thing, be posts about Babylon5 in rec.arts.tv.
Etc., Etc., Etc..
It doesn't work that way though. If you go to pretty much any general
TV news website, they have posts about any show. They don't leave shows
out because there is already other Doctor Who, Star Trek, etc. specific >websites. :-)
Some people just aren't interested in subscribing to hundreds separate >newsgroups when only one main one would do. Other people prefer to
subscribe to the separate ones.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vne6ne$2idno$[email protected]>,its time for the stats
Your Name <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2025-01-29 12:44:08 +0000, Daniel70 said:
On 29/01/2025 2:45 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <tq5EiOBWyJmnFwAB@jhall_nospamxx.co.uk>,
John Hall <[email protected]> wrote:
In message <vn8u45$18ghe$[email protected]>, Your Name
<[email protected]> writes
<Snip>
If some of the people using that newsgroup don't like Doctor Who (or >>>>>>> whatever show) posted there, then that's their problem. I don't like >>>>>>> 90% of the shows they post about either, but they're certainly allowed >>>>>>> to post about them and they are far more on topic than all the silly >>>>>>> political posts that infest rec.arts.tv
Never having followed rec.arts.tv, I couldn't comment on that.
Well it should encompass DW!
I would tend to disagree .... rec.arts.tv should be the group for ALL
T.V. shows for which there isn't a more specific newsgroup.
Doctor Who has specific newsgroups, so there shouldn't, as a normal
thing, be posts about Doctor Who in rec.arts.tv.
Startrek has specific newsgroups, so there shouldn't, as a normal
thing, be posts about Startrek in rec.arts.tv.
Babylon5 has specific newsgroups, so there shouldn't, as a normal
thing, be posts about Babylon5 in rec.arts.tv.
Etc., Etc., Etc..
It doesn't work that way though. If you go to pretty much any general
TV news website, they have posts about any show. They don't leave shows
out because there is already other Doctor Who, Star Trek, etc. specific
websites. :-)
Some people just aren't interested in subscribing to hundreds separate
newsgroups when only one main one would do. Other people prefer to
subscribe to the separate ones.
I love variety.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <[email protected]>,well i can't do it
% <[email protected]> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vne6ne$2idno$[email protected]>,its time for the stats
Your Name <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2025-01-29 12:44:08 +0000, Daniel70 said:
On 29/01/2025 2:45 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <tq5EiOBWyJmnFwAB@jhall_nospamxx.co.uk>,
John Hall <[email protected]> wrote:
In message <vn8u45$18ghe$[email protected]>, Your Name
<[email protected]> writes
<Snip>
If some of the people using that newsgroup don't like Doctor Who (or >>>>>>>>> whatever show) posted there, then that's their problem. I don't like >>>>>>>>> 90% of the shows they post about either, but they're certainly allowed
to post about them and they are far more on topic than all the silly >>>>>>>>> political posts that infest rec.arts.tv
Never having followed rec.arts.tv, I couldn't comment on that.
Well it should encompass DW!
I would tend to disagree .... rec.arts.tv should be the group for ALL >>>>>> T.V. shows for which there isn't a more specific newsgroup.
Doctor Who has specific newsgroups, so there shouldn't, as a normal >>>>>> thing, be posts about Doctor Who in rec.arts.tv.
Startrek has specific newsgroups, so there shouldn't, as a normal
thing, be posts about Startrek in rec.arts.tv.
Babylon5 has specific newsgroups, so there shouldn't, as a normal
thing, be posts about Babylon5 in rec.arts.tv.
Etc., Etc., Etc..
It doesn't work that way though. If you go to pretty much any general >>>>> TV news website, they have posts about any show. They don't leave shows >>>>> out because there is already other Doctor Who, Star Trek, etc. specific >>>>> websites. :-)
Some people just aren't interested in subscribing to hundreds separate >>>>> newsgroups when only one main one would do. Other people prefer to
subscribe to the separate ones.
I love variety.
Well ...
The Doctor wrote:
In article <[email protected]>,certainly allowed
% <[email protected]> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <[email protected]>,
% <[email protected]> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vne6ne$2idno$[email protected]>,
Your Name <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2025-01-29 12:44:08 +0000, Daniel70 said:
On 29/01/2025 2:45 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <tq5EiOBWyJmnFwAB@jhall_nospamxx.co.uk>,
John Hall <[email protected]> wrote:
In message <vn8u45$18ghe$[email protected]>, Your Name
<[email protected]> writes
<Snip>
If some of the people using that newsgroup don't like Doctor Who (or
whatever show) posted there, then that's their problem. I don't like
90% of the shows they post about either, but they're
the stats won't change nowwell i can't do itits time for the statsWell it should encompass DW!to post about them and they are far more on topic than all the silly
political posts that infest rec.arts.tv
Never having followed rec.arts.tv, I couldn't comment on that. >>>>>>>>>
I would tend to disagree .... rec.arts.tv should be the group for ALL >>>>>>>> T.V. shows for which there isn't a more specific newsgroup.
Doctor Who has specific newsgroups, so there shouldn't, as a normal >>>>>>>> thing, be posts about Doctor Who in rec.arts.tv.
Startrek has specific newsgroups, so there shouldn't, as a normal >>>>>>>> thing, be posts about Startrek in rec.arts.tv.
Babylon5 has specific newsgroups, so there shouldn't, as a normal >>>>>>>> thing, be posts about Babylon5 in rec.arts.tv.
Etc., Etc., Etc..
It doesn't work that way though. If you go to pretty much any general >>>>>>> TV news website, they have posts about any show. They don't leave shows >>>>>>> out because there is already other Doctor Who, Star Trek, etc. specific >>>>>>> websites. :-)
Some people just aren't interested in subscribing to hundreds separate >>>>>>> newsgroups when only one main one would do. Other people prefer to >>>>>>> subscribe to the separate ones.
I love variety.
Well ...
End of month comes within 72 hurs.
On 2025-01-29 12:44:08 +0000, Daniel70 said:
On 29/01/2025 2:45 am, The Doctor wrote:
Well it should encompass DW!
I would tend to disagree .... rec.arts.tv should be the
group for ALL T.V. shows for which there isn't a more
specific newsgroup.
Doctor Who has specific newsgroups, so there shouldn't, as a
normal thing, be posts about Doctor Who in rec.arts.tv.
Startrek has specific newsgroups, so there shouldn't, as a
normal thing, be posts about Startrek in rec.arts.tv.
Babylon5 has specific newsgroups, so there shouldn't, as a
normal thing, be posts about Babylon5 in rec.arts.tv.
Etc., Etc., Etc..
It doesn't work that way though. If you go to pretty much any
general TV news website, they have posts about any show. They
don't leave shows out because there is already other Doctor
Who, Star Trek, etc. specific websites. :-)
Some people just aren't interested in subscribing to hundreds
separate newsgroups when only one main one would do. Other
people prefer to subscribe to the separate ones.
its time for the stats
In article <vnd7qr$2cmec$[email protected]>, Daniel70 <[email protected]> wrote:
On 29/01/2025 2:45 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <tq5EiOBWyJmnFwAB@jhall_nospamxx.co.uk>, John Hall
<[email protected]> wrote:
In message <vn8u45$18ghe$[email protected]>, Your Name
<[email protected]> writes
<Snip>
If some of the people using that newsgroup don't like Doctor
Who (or whatever show) posted there, then that's their
problem. I don't like 90% of the shows they post about
either, but they're certainly allowed to post about them and
they are far more on topic than all the silly political posts
that infest rec.arts.tv
Never having followed rec.arts.tv, I couldn't comment on that.
Well it should encompass DW!
I would tend to disagree .... rec.arts.tv should be the group for
ALL T.V. shows for which there isn't a more specific newsgroup.
Doctor Who has specific newsgroups, so there shouldn't, as a
normal thing, be posts about Doctor Who in rec.arts.tv.
Startrek has specific newsgroups, so there shouldn't, as a normal
thing, be posts about Startrek in rec.arts.tv.
Babylon5 has specific newsgroups, so there shouldn't, as a normal
thing, be posts about Babylon5 in rec.arts.tv.
Etc., Etc., Etc..
IYIO.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <[email protected]>,
% <[email protected]> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
well i can't do itI love variety.its time for the stats
Well ...
The Doctor wrote:
In article <[email protected]>,
% <[email protected]> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <[email protected]>,
% <[email protected]> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <[email protected]>,
% <[email protected]> wrote:
you'll win i'll be second but that means i really win so i winthe stats won't change nowwell i can't do itits time for the stats
Well ...
End of month comes within 72 hurs.
Oh?
The Doctor wrote:
In article <[email protected]>,Doctor Who (or
% <[email protected]> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <[email protected]>,
% <[email protected]> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <[email protected]>,
% <[email protected]> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vne6ne$2idno$[email protected]>,
Your Name <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2025-01-29 12:44:08 +0000, Daniel70 said:
On 29/01/2025 2:45 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <tq5EiOBWyJmnFwAB@jhall_nospamxx.co.uk>,
John Hall <[email protected]> wrote:
In message <vn8u45$18ghe$[email protected]>, Your Name
<[email protected]> writes
<Snip>
If some of the people using that newsgroup don't like
don't likewhatever show) posted there, then that's their problem. I
the sillycertainly allowed90% of the shows they post about either, but they're
to post about them and they are far more on topic than all
you'll win i'll be second but that means i really win so i winthe stats won't change nowwell i can't do itits time for the statsWell it should encompass DW!political posts that infest rec.arts.tv
Never having followed rec.arts.tv, I couldn't comment on that. >>>>>>>>>>>
I would tend to disagree .... rec.arts.tv should be the group for ALL
T.V. shows for which there isn't a more specific newsgroup. >>>>>>>>>>
Doctor Who has specific newsgroups, so there shouldn't, as a normal >>>>>>>>>> thing, be posts about Doctor Who in rec.arts.tv.
Startrek has specific newsgroups, so there shouldn't, as a normal >>>>>>>>>> thing, be posts about Startrek in rec.arts.tv.
Babylon5 has specific newsgroups, so there shouldn't, as a normal >>>>>>>>>> thing, be posts about Babylon5 in rec.arts.tv.
Etc., Etc., Etc..
It doesn't work that way though. If you go to pretty much any general >>>>>>>>> TV news website, they have posts about any show. They don't leave shows
out because there is already other Doctor Who, Star Trek, etc. specific
websites. :-)
Some people just aren't interested in subscribing to hundreds separate
newsgroups when only one main one would do. Other people prefer to >>>>>>>>> subscribe to the separate ones.
I love variety.
Well ...
End of month comes within 72 hurs.
Oh?
Your Name wrote:
On 2025-01-29 12:44:08 +0000, Daniel70 said:
On 29/01/2025 2:45 am, The Doctor wrote:
Well it should encompass DW!
I would tend to disagree .... rec.arts.tv should be the
group for ALL T.V. shows for which there isn't a more
specific newsgroup.
Doctor Who has specific newsgroups, so there shouldn't, as a
normal thing, be posts about Doctor Who in rec.arts.tv.
Startrek has specific newsgroups, so there shouldn't, as a
normal thing, be posts about Startrek in rec.arts.tv.
Babylon5 has specific newsgroups, so there shouldn't, as a
normal thing, be posts about Babylon5 in rec.arts.tv.
Etc., Etc., Etc..
It doesn't work that way though. If you go to pretty much any
general TV news website, they have posts about any show. They
don't leave shows out because there is already other Doctor
Who, Star Trek, etc. specific websites. :-)
Some people just aren't interested in subscribing to hundreds
separate newsgroups when only one main one would do. Other
people prefer to subscribe to the separate ones.
Yeah, I think I'd agree with that. Each to their own and all
that...
If people on generalised newsgroups don't like something their
killfile is an easy option... as is, just ignoring the post and
moving on to the next one.
Life on Usenet is as simple as its users want to make it.
On 30/01/2025 12:49 am, The Doctor wrote:^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted >Informed Opinion!!
In article <vnd7qr$2cmec$[email protected]>, Daniel70
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 29/01/2025 2:45 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <tq5EiOBWyJmnFwAB@jhall_nospamxx.co.uk>, John Hall
<[email protected]> wrote:
In message <vn8u45$18ghe$[email protected]>, Your Name
<[email protected]> writes
<Snip>
If some of the people using that newsgroup don't like Doctor
Who (or whatever show) posted there, then that's their
problem. I don't like 90% of the shows they post about
either, but they're certainly allowed to post about them and
they are far more on topic than all the silly political posts
that infest rec.arts.tv
Never having followed rec.arts.tv, I couldn't comment on that.
Well it should encompass DW!
I would tend to disagree .... rec.arts.tv should be the group for
ALL T.V. shows for which there isn't a more specific newsgroup.
Doctor Who has specific newsgroups, so there shouldn't, as a
normal thing, be posts about Doctor Who in rec.arts.tv.
Startrek has specific newsgroups, so there shouldn't, as a normal
thing, be posts about Startrek in rec.arts.tv.
Babylon5 has specific newsgroups, so there shouldn't, as a normal
thing, be posts about Babylon5 in rec.arts.tv.
Etc., Etc., Etc..
IYIO.
As I was the one who expressed that opinion, Binky, YES, it is MY
--
Daniel70
On 30/01/2025 9:34 am, % wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <[email protected]>,
% <[email protected]> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
<Snip>
well i can't do itI love variety.its time for the stats
Well ...
Why not?? I mean you will win, but still .......
--
Daniel70
On 30/01/2025 2:29 pm, % wrote:^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted!
The Doctor wrote:
In article <[email protected]>,
% <[email protected]> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <[email protected]>,
% <[email protected]> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <[email protected]>,
% <[email protected]> wrote:
<Snip>
you'll win i'll be second but that means i really win so i winthe stats won't change nowwell i can't do itits time for the stats
Well ...
End of month comes within 72 hurs.
Oh?
Ah!! So THAT'S your logic ..... Binky might post the most but
Binky doesn't count so you WIN!!^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted!
Makes sense to me!!
--
Daniel70
% wrote:
its time for the stats
What? No, not the stats!
In article <vnfk5j$2ta26$[email protected]>,
Daniel70 <[email protected]> wrote:
On 30/01/2025 12:49 am, The Doctor wrote:
IYIO.
As I was the one who expressed that opinion, Binky, YES, it
is MY Informed Opinion!!
The second I stands for Important, not Informed.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vnfk5j$2ta26$[email protected]>,
Daniel70 <[email protected]> wrote:
On 30/01/2025 12:49 am, The Doctor wrote:
IYIO.
As I was the one who expressed that opinion, Binky, YES, it
is MY Informed Opinion!!
The second I stands for Important, not Informed.
IYIO !
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vnfk5j$2ta26$[email protected]>,
Daniel70 <[email protected]> wrote:
On 30/01/2025 12:49 am, The Doctor wrote:
IYIO.
As I was the one who expressed that opinion, Binky, YES, it
is MY Informed Opinion!!
The second I stands for Important, not Informed.
IYIO !
On 2025-01-30 12:09:50 +0000, Blueshirt said:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vnfk5j$2ta26$[email protected]>,
Daniel70 <[email protected]> wrote:
On 30/01/2025 12:49 am, The Doctor wrote:
IYIO.
As I was the one who expressed that opinion, Binky, YES, it
is MY Informed Opinion!!
The second I stands for Important, not Informed.
IYIO !
Depends on who you are replying to. The second "I" can also stand for >"Idiotic" or "Imbecilic" or "Inane". :-p
Blueshirt wrote:
% wrote:yep , stat time
its time for the stats
What? No, not the stats!
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 715 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 37:11:46 |
| Calls: | 12,109 |
| Files: | 15,006 |
| Messages: | 6,518,370 |
