• Re: (Big Hair Big Guns) The Integral Trees by Larry Niven

    From Robert Woodward@21:1/5 to Cryptoengineer on Thu Aug 7 21:44:54 2025
    In article <1073n36$d5th$[email protected]>,
    Cryptoengineer <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 8/7/2025 8:53 AM, James Nicoll wrote:
    The Integral Trees (Integral Trees, volume 1) by Larry Niven

    Climate change provides a tribal leader a pretext to dispatch his least favourite tribe members on an ill-fated expedition from which none will return.

    https://jamesdavisnicoll.com/review/your-sanctuary

    Allow me to get super picky, and comment on a comment:

    Jacob Haller wrote:
    I would happily gloss over things like there not being any reason to
    think that integral-shaped trees bobbing around in a vacuum would have
    a stable orientation.

    In this case Jacob's wrong, and Niven was right.

    Elongated objects in orbit tend to assume a position with the longest
    axis pointed towards to center of the orbit, due to gravity gradients.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravity-gradient_stabilization

    There's a lot of very bad physics in the book, but that at least
    is right.


    I have a vague recollection of Niven mentioning that Robert L. Forward
    did some of the world-building, which means that I am reluctant to use
    the phrase "bad physics".

    --
    "We have advanced to new and surprising levels of bafflement."
    Imperial Auditor Miles Vorkosigan describes progress in _Komarr_. —-----------------------------------------------------
    Robert Woodward [email protected]

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From James Nicoll@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Fri Aug 8 14:00:19 2025
    In article <[email protected]>,
    Robert Woodward <[email protected]> wrote:
    In article <1073n36$d5th$[email protected]>,
    Cryptoengineer <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 8/7/2025 8:53 AM, James Nicoll wrote:
    The Integral Trees (Integral Trees, volume 1) by Larry Niven

    Climate change provides a tribal leader a pretext to dispatch his least
    favourite tribe members on an ill-fated expedition from which none will
    return.

    https://jamesdavisnicoll.com/review/your-sanctuary

    Allow me to get super picky, and comment on a comment:

    Jacob Haller wrote:
    I would happily gloss over things like there not being any reason to
    think that integral-shaped trees bobbing around in a vacuum would have
    a stable orientation.

    In this case Jacob's wrong, and Niven was right.

    Elongated objects in orbit tend to assume a position with the longest
    axis pointed towards to center of the orbit, due to gravity gradients.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravity-gradient_stabilization

    There's a lot of very bad physics in the book, but that at least
    is right.


    I have a vague recollection of Niven mentioning that Robert L. Forward
    did some of the world-building, which means that I am reluctant to use
    the phrase "bad physics".


    Remember that Forward's work then got filtered through Niven.


    --
    My reviews can be found at http://jamesdavisnicoll.com/
    My tor pieces at https://www.tor.com/author/james-davis-nicoll/
    My Dreamwidth at https://james-davis-nicoll.dreamwidth.org/
    My patreon is at https://www.patreon.com/jamesdnicoll

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Robert Woodward@21:1/5 to James Nicoll on Fri Aug 8 21:55:23 2025
    In article <1074vti$msc$[email protected]>,
    [email protected] (James Nicoll) wrote:

    In article <[email protected]>,
    Robert Woodward <[email protected]> wrote:
    In article <1073n36$d5th$[email protected]>,
    Cryptoengineer <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 8/7/2025 8:53 AM, James Nicoll wrote:
    The Integral Trees (Integral Trees, volume 1) by Larry Niven

    Climate change provides a tribal leader a pretext to dispatch his least >> > favourite tribe members on an ill-fated expedition from which none will >> > return.

    https://jamesdavisnicoll.com/review/your-sanctuary

    Allow me to get super picky, and comment on a comment:

    Jacob Haller wrote:
    I would happily gloss over things like there not being any reason to
    think that integral-shaped trees bobbing around in a vacuum would have >> > a stable orientation.

    In this case Jacob's wrong, and Niven was right.

    Elongated objects in orbit tend to assume a position with the longest
    axis pointed towards to center of the orbit, due to gravity gradients.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravity-gradient_stabilization

    There's a lot of very bad physics in the book, but that at least
    is right.


    I have a vague recollection of Niven mentioning that Robert L. Forward
    did some of the world-building, which means that I am reluctant to use
    the phrase "bad physics".


    Remember that Forward's work then got filtered through Niven.

    The dedication for _Integral Trees_ says that Forward worked on the
    parameters of the Smoke Ring. I will point out that the diagrams at the
    start of that book specify the radius of the mid point of the Smoke Ring
    and other numbers. I wonder where they came from.

    --
    "We have advanced to new and surprising levels of bafflement."
    Imperial Auditor Miles Vorkosigan describes progress in _Komarr_. �-----------------------------------------------------
    Robert Woodward [email protected]

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)