On Sat, 5 Oct 2024 11:36:30 -0400, Ahasuerus <
[email protected]>
wrote:
On 10/4/2024 10:13 PM, Chris Buckley wrote:
On 2024-10-04, The Doctor <[email protected]> wrote:
A question for discussion.
It's bee happening for a couple of years already. Why should it stop
now that the AI is better?>
NY Times 2/23/2023
And now, it seems, it's happening in real life. The editors of three
science fiction magazines � Clarkesworld, The Magazine of Fantasy &
Science Fiction, and Asimov's Science Fiction � said this week that
they had been flooded by submissions of works of fiction generated
by A.I. chatbots.
According to Neil Clarke's (the editor of _Clarkesworld_) post on
February 15, 2023 (https://neil-clarke.com/a-concerning-trend/):
I�m not going to detail how I know these stories are �AI� spam or
outline any of the data I have collected from these submissions.
There are some very obvious patterns [snip]
I guess we could rephrase the original question: "Can CHATGPT or Google >Gemini write SF that is not obviously AI-generated? And if they can't do
it now, what about 1-3-5-10 years from now?" As Clarke wrote in his post:
the technology is only going to get better, so detection will become
more challenging
I believe there is work being done on that -- that is, leaving
clues/marks that something is generated by AI.
Of course, the only effect if this is doable and accepted at all will
be two classes of AI: those that conform (and, if appropriate, are
legal) and those that don't (and, if appropriate, are illegal).
--
"Here lies the Tuscan poet Aretino,
Who evil spoke of everyone but God,
Giving as his excuse, 'I never knew him.'"
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)