• Relevant - Plate Tectonics Might Only Occur on 0.003% of Planets. That

    From a425couple@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jul 4 09:54:50 2024
    XPost: alt.fan.heinlein

    Big DEAL !!
    So many times greats like Heinlein and Silverberg have written
    about us going to exoplanets, and it being like Earth.
    Sorry,,,, NO!

    from https://www.universetoday.com/167659/plate-tectonics-might-only-occur-on-0-003-of-planets-that-makes-earth-very-special-indeed/

    Plate tectonics: Image Credit: NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center
    Scientific Visualization Studio
    POSTED ONJULY 2, 2024 BY SCOTT ALAN JOHNSTON

    Plate Tectonics Might Only Occur on 0.003% of Planets. That Makes Earth
    Very Special Indeed.
    Plate tectonics, oceans, and continents might just be the secret
    ingredients for complex life on Earth. And if these geological features
    are rare elsewhere in the universe, then perhaps that explains why we
    haven’t yet discovered intelligent alien life. New research from
    American and Swiss Earth scientists suggests that these ingredients
    represent missing variables in the famous Drake equation, devised more
    than half a century ago to estimate the chances of finding advanced civilizations in our galaxy. Including these new variables could
    completely rewrite the probability of detecting intelligent life in the
    Milky Way.

    Go to the citation for the rest ----.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dimensional Traveler@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jul 4 12:33:02 2024
    XPost: alt.fan.heinlein

    On 7/4/2024 9:54 AM, a425couple wrote:
    Big DEAL !!
    So many times greats like Heinlein and Silverberg have written
    about us going to exoplanets, and it being like Earth.
    Sorry,,,, NO!

    from https://www.universetoday.com/167659/plate-tectonics-might-only-occur-on-0-003-of-planets-that-makes-earth-very-special-indeed/

    Plate tectonics: Image Credit: NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center
    Scientific Visualization Studio
    POSTED ONJULY 2, 2024 BY SCOTT ALAN JOHNSTON

    Plate Tectonics Might Only Occur on 0.003% of Planets. That Makes Earth
    Very Special Indeed.
    Plate tectonics, oceans, and continents might just be the secret
    ingredients for complex life on Earth. And if these geological features
    are rare elsewhere in the universe, then perhaps that explains why we haven’t yet discovered intelligent alien life. New research from
    American and Swiss Earth scientists suggests that these ingredients
    represent missing variables in the famous Drake equation, devised more
    than half a century ago to estimate the chances of finding advanced civilizations in our galaxy. Including these new variables could
    completely rewrite the probability of detecting intelligent life in the
    Milky Way.

    Go to the citation for the rest ----.

    I went to the citation but couldn't find if that 0.003% is of ALL
    exo-planets or just the Terrestrial/Super-Terrestrial types.

    --
    I've done good in this world. Now I'm tired and just want to be a cranky
    dirty old man.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From a425couple@21:1/5 to Dimensional Traveler on Thu Jul 4 16:49:05 2024
    XPost: alt.fan.heinlein

    On 7/4/24 12:33, Dimensional Traveler wrote:
    On 7/4/2024 9:54 AM, a425couple wrote:
    Big DEAL !!
    So many times greats like Heinlein and Silverberg have written
    about us going to exoplanets, and it being like Earth.
    Sorry,,,, NO!

    from
    https://www.universetoday.com/167659/plate-tectonics-might-only-occur-on-0-003-of-planets-that-makes-earth-very-special-indeed/

    Plate tectonics: Image Credit: NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center
    Scientific Visualization Studio
    POSTED ONJULY 2, 2024 BY SCOTT ALAN JOHNSTON

    -----------snip-------

    Go to the citation for the rest ----.

    I went to the citation but couldn't find if that 0.003% is of ALL
    exo-planets or just the Terrestrial/Super-Terrestrial types.


    "the rest" of the citation, did not give a lot of specific information. Hopefully we will see a lot more on this research in the future.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dimensional Traveler@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jul 4 19:25:30 2024
    XPost: alt.fan.heinlein

    On 7/4/2024 4:49 PM, a425couple wrote:
    On 7/4/24 12:33, Dimensional Traveler wrote:
    On 7/4/2024 9:54 AM, a425couple wrote:
    Big DEAL !!
    So many times greats like Heinlein and Silverberg have written
    about us going to exoplanets, and it being like Earth.
    Sorry,,,, NO!

    from
    https://www.universetoday.com/167659/plate-tectonics-might-only-occur-on-0-003-of-planets-that-makes-earth-very-special-indeed/

    Plate tectonics: Image Credit: NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center
    Scientific Visualization Studio
    POSTED ONJULY 2, 2024 BY SCOTT ALAN JOHNSTON

    -----------snip-------

    Go to the citation for the rest ----.

    I went to the citation but couldn't find if that 0.003% is of ALL
    exo-planets or just the Terrestrial/Super-Terrestrial types.


    "the rest" of the citation, did not give a lot of specific information. Hopefully we will see a lot more on this research in the future.

    I also think there's a flaw in their basic assumptions. If you have a
    rocky planet with a liquid core/mantle, you are going to have plate
    tectonics.

    --
    I've done good in this world. Now I'm tired and just want to be a cranky
    dirty old man.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Savard@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jul 5 07:22:54 2024
    I remember back in the day it being claimed that Earth's very unique
    giant Moon may have been essential for the development of life on
    Earth along the lines it took.

    So this claim about plate tectonics reminds me of that.

    But I don't see this as bad news, if it were true. It would just mean
    that we don't life in the kind of claustrophobically overcrowded
    Univese that we see on the TV show Star Trek, and I would be glad of
    that.

    By building O'Neill-type space habitats, or through terraforming, we
    could still establish a human presence on star systems which have
    rocky planets, even though those planets are all lifeless and don't
    have breathable atmospheres. It's to the better that, if we gain the
    ability to travel among the stars, that we won't find that every place
    to which we might expand is already taken... and to the better that we
    aren't going to be conquered, enslaved, or destroyed by vastly
    superior aliens as soon as we start to get ourselves noticed.

    Which TV and FM radio might already have done.

    John Savard

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul S Person@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jul 5 08:18:09 2024
    XPost: alt.fan.heinlein

    On Thu, 4 Jul 2024 09:54:50 -0700, a425couple <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    Big DEAL !!
    So many times greats like Heinlein and Silverberg have written
    about us going to exoplanets, and it being like Earth.
    Sorry,,,, NO!

    from >https://www.universetoday.com/167659/plate-tectonics-might-only-occur-on-0-003-of-planets-that-makes-earth-very-special-indeed/

    Plate tectonics: Image Credit: NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center
    Scientific Visualization Studio
    POSTED ONJULY 2, 2024 BY SCOTT ALAN JOHNSTON

    Plate Tectonics Might Only Occur on 0.003% of Planets. That Makes Earth
    Very Special Indeed.
    Plate tectonics, oceans, and continents might just be the secret
    ingredients for complex life on Earth. And if these geological features
    are rare elsewhere in the universe, then perhaps that explains why we >haven�t yet discovered intelligent alien life. New research from
    American and Swiss Earth scientists suggests that these ingredients >represent missing variables in the famous Drake equation, devised more
    than half a century ago to estimate the chances of finding advanced >civilizations in our galaxy. Including these new variables could
    completely rewrite the probability of detecting intelligent life in the >Milky Way.

    Go to the citation for the rest ----.

    Note the sequence here:

    1. Certain people believe -- firmly, passionately, and religiously
    believe -- that We Are Not Alone. This /must/ be true, they say, it
    just /must/ be true.
    2. The problem is, no actual evidence of this has been found.
    3. Indeed, no actual evidence is likely to be found until we /go out
    into the universe and see/.
    4. Since the radio frequencies /we have decided/ are the ones that
    would be used to communicate with us are silent, they are desperate
    for excuses. They, of course, call them "explanations".
    5. Lack of Plate Tectonics is simply the latest excuse.

    What I /wouldn't/ find if I bothered to read the article:
    a detailed discussion of, say, 500 planets (or even of 1 extrasolar
    planet) which we have travelled to and investigated thoroughly and how
    many of them had plate tectonics, a large natural satellite, an
    absence of Dark Matter, archaeological evidence of past (and now gone)
    Alien Civilizations, or any of the other excuses that have been
    offered.

    I wouldn't find that because the only planets we have visited are in
    our own Solar System -- and, even so, we haven't actually explored
    them enough to know for certain that a past civilization did not
    exist. All we can say is that /by the criteria we decided on
    ourselves, which may or may not be adequate/ there isn't any life on
    any of them. At least, not any that we have found to date.
    --
    "Here lies the Tuscan poet Aretino,
    Who evil spoke of everyone but God,
    Giving as his excuse, 'I never knew him.'"

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From a425couple@21:1/5 to John Savard on Fri Jul 5 14:01:44 2024
    XPost: alt.astronomy

    On 7/5/24 06:22, John Savard wrote:
    I remember back in the day it being claimed that Earth's very unique
    giant Moon may have been essential for the development of life on
    Earth along the lines it took.

    So this claim about plate tectonics reminds me of that.


    OK
    Rare Earth: Why Complex Life is Uncommon in the Universe
    Paperback – December 10, 2003
    by Peter D. Ward (Author), Donald Brownlee

    both the book, and the wiki, you can see more at https://www.amazon.com/Rare-Earth-Complex-Uncommon-Universe/dp/0387952896
    and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rare_Earth:_Why_Complex_Life_Is_Uncommon_in_the_Universe

    is a very informative and important book on the subject.
    Yes, the Moon, and plate tectonics are very important,
    as are a big complex of other factors like Jupiter,
    Goldilocks Zone, the right kind of star, etc.

    But I don't see this as bad news, if it were true.

    OK.
    I am not sure that your "superior aliens" are necessarily
    bad, but yeah, they might not be good for us.

    You might look up earlier mentioned book "Saturn Run".

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From a425couple@21:1/5 to Dimensional Traveler on Fri Jul 5 13:40:20 2024
    XPost: alt.fan.heinlein, alt.astronomy

    On 7/4/24 19:25, Dimensional Traveler wrote:
    On 7/4/2024 4:49 PM, a425couple wrote:
    On 7/4/24 12:33, Dimensional Traveler wrote:
    On 7/4/2024 9:54 AM, a425couple wrote:
    Big DEAL !!
    So many times greats like Heinlein and Silverberg have written
    about us going to exoplanets, and it being like Earth.
    Sorry,,,, NO!

    from
    https://www.universetoday.com/167659/plate-tectonics-might-only-occur-on-0-003-of-planets-that-makes-earth-very-special-indeed/

    Plate tectonics: Image Credit: NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center
    Scientific Visualization Studio
    POSTED ONJULY 2, 2024 BY SCOTT ALAN JOHNSTON

    -----------snip-------

    Go to the citation for the rest ----.

    I went to the citation but couldn't find if that 0.003% is of ALL
    exo-planets or just the Terrestrial/Super-Terrestrial types.


    "the rest" of the citation, did not give a lot of specific information.
    Hopefully we will see a lot more on this research in the future.

    I also think there's a flaw in their basic assumptions.  If you have a
    rocky planet with a liquid core/mantle, you are going to have plate tectonics.

    resending----

    Ahhh,,,, ??
    I do not know about that. Needs to get more detailed.
    Take Mars, the closest and most explored example.
    It has pretty much lost internal movement,
    thus magnetic waves that protect it from
    solar waves, and the solar wind has wiped off
    most atmosphere, and water.

    Question Does Mars have plate tectonics?

    Mars, it seems, once had active tectonic plates spreading away from
    long, narrow volcanic rifts, according to two reports in tomorrow's
    Science (pp.
    https://www.science.org › content › article › past-tecton...
    Past Tectonics on Mars? | Science | AAAS

    Why doesn't Mars have plate tectonics?
    Shaping the Planets: Tectonism
    Like Earth, Venus and Mars are believed to have hot interiors. This
    means that they are continuing to lose heat. While their surfaces show
    evidence of recent deformation — tectonism — neither planet has plate tectonic activity because neither planet has a surface divided into plates.

    Shaping the Planets: Tectonism - Lunar and Planetary Institute
    Lunar and Planetary Institute

    What planets have plate tectonics?

    Why Earth is the only planet with plate tectonics - Big Think
    Here in our Solar System, of all the known planets, only Earth — not
    Mercury, not Venus, and not Mars — is known to possess plate
    tectonics.Mar 27, 2023

    How Mars Lost Its Magnetic Field—and Then Its Oceans - JSTOR Daily
    JSTOR Daily
    https://daily.jstor.org › how-mars-lost-its-magnetic-field-...
    Search for: Why did Mars lose its magnetic field?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Savard@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jul 5 15:20:26 2024
    On Fri, 5 Jul 2024 14:01:44 -0700, a425couple <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    On 7/5/24 06:22, John Savard wrote:
    I remember back in the day it being claimed that Earth's very unique
    giant Moon may have been essential for the development of life on
    Earth along the lines it took.

    So this claim about plate tectonics reminds me of that.


    OK
    Rare Earth: Why Complex Life is Uncommon in the Universe
    Paperback � December 10, 2003
    by Peter D. Ward (Author), Donald Brownlee

    both the book, and the wiki, you can see more at >https://www.amazon.com/Rare-Earth-Complex-Uncommon-Universe/dp/0387952896
    and >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rare_Earth:_Why_Complex_Life_Is_Uncommon_in_the_Universe

    is a very informative and important book on the subject.
    Yes, the Moon, and plate tectonics are very important,
    as are a big complex of other factors like Jupiter,
    Goldilocks Zone, the right kind of star, etc.

    But I don't see this as bad news, if it were true.

    OK.
    I am not sure that your "superior aliens" are necessarily
    bad, but yeah, they might not be good for us.

    You might look up earlier mentioned book "Saturn Run".

    Ah, yes. Rare Earth brings in another factor: there may be a habitable
    zone in galazies, with those systems further out not having enough
    asteroids to shake things up and speed up evolution, and those in the
    center of the galaxy being so metal rich as to have constant asteroid
    impacts.

    And I agree with Arthur C. Clarke, that advanced aliens are more
    likely to be benificent. However, in a crowded Universe, there would
    be so many races that some might be exceptions to that rule.

    John Savard

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Savard@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Fri Jul 5 15:33:40 2024
    On Fri, 05 Jul 2024 08:18:09 -0700, Paul S Person
    <[email protected]d> wrote:

    1. Certain people believe -- firmly, passionately, and religiously
    believe -- that We Are Not Alone. This /must/ be true, they say, it
    just /must/ be true.

    That's not _too_ unreasonable a belief. After all, _we_ exist.
    Therefore, it is possible for intelligent life to evolve, it is
    possible for life to originate on a planet.

    So, if this is possible to happen naturally here, it's possible
    elsewhere.

    And the Universe is a very big place.

    It's just that we have no way to know just _how_ "not alone" we are.
    Are there hundreds of civilizations in the typical galaxy... or is our civilization the only one, not only in this galaxy, but also for
    hundreds of galaxies?

    And in the latter case, if it's also true that faster-than-light
    travel is utterly impossible... first contact may be a long way off.

    John Savard

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Titus G@21:1/5 to Paul S Person on Sat Jul 6 10:24:52 2024
    Much snippage.

    On 6/07/24 03:18, Paul S Person wrote:
    1. Certain people believe -- firmly, passionately, and religiously
    believe -- that We Are Not Alone. This /must/ be true, they say, it
    just /must/ be true.

    You seem to be implying that all such people are nutters but my general understanding is that many credible believers do so because of
    statistics, the incomprehensible, to me, number of planets possible. Restricting that to a further three in a thousand will not change that
    belief.

    Adam Roberts addresses and solves the Fermi Paradox in the final part of
    Jack Glass.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From a425couple@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jul 5 16:34:27 2024
    XPost: alt.fan.heinlein

    On 7/4/24 09:54, a425couple wrote:
    Big DEAL !!
    So many times greats like Heinlein and Silverberg have written
    about us going to exoplanets, and it being like Earth.
    Sorry,,,, NO!

    from https://www.universetoday.com/167659/plate-tectonics-might-only-occur-on-0-003-of-planets-that-makes-earth-very-special-indeed/

    Or, in summary

    “Two possibilities exist: either we are alone in the Universe
    or we are not. Both are equally terrifying.”
    ― Arthur C. Clarke

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dimensional Traveler@21:1/5 to Cryptoengineer on Fri Jul 5 17:57:31 2024
    XPost: alt.fan.heinlein

    On 7/5/2024 11:00 AM, Cryptoengineer wrote:
    On 7/4/2024 10:25 PM, Dimensional Traveler wrote:
    On 7/4/2024 4:49 PM, a425couple wrote:
    On 7/4/24 12:33, Dimensional Traveler wrote:
    On 7/4/2024 9:54 AM, a425couple wrote:
    Big DEAL !!
    So many times greats like Heinlein and Silverberg have written
    about us going to exoplanets, and it being like Earth.
    Sorry,,,, NO!

    from
    https://www.universetoday.com/167659/plate-tectonics-might-only-occur-on-0-003-of-planets-that-makes-earth-very-special-indeed/

    Plate tectonics: Image Credit: NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center
    Scientific Visualization Studio
    POSTED ONJULY 2, 2024 BY SCOTT ALAN JOHNSTON

    -----------snip-------

    Go to the citation for the rest ----.

    I went to the citation but couldn't find if that 0.003% is of ALL
    exo-planets or just the Terrestrial/Super-Terrestrial types.


    "the rest" of the citation, did not give a lot of specific information.
    Hopefully we will see a lot more on this research in the future.

    I also think there's a flaw in their basic assumptions.  If you have a
    rocky planet with a liquid core/mantle, you are going to have plate
    tectonics.

    Venus, Mars, and Mercury suggest otherwise.

    I believe Mars and Mercury's cores have solidified. Venus has ... other
    issues but does have active vulcanism. And considering how many it has
    may make up for the locked crustal plates.

    My impression is that the existance of a (relatively shallow)
    water ocean is critical. There's also a suggestion that a major
    meteor impact may have been involved in starting the process.

    Theia was a bit more than a meteor and yes, liquefying the entire planet
    a second time might have an effect.

    --
    I've done good in this world. Now I'm tired and just want to be a cranky
    dirty old man.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul S Person@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Sat Jul 6 09:26:15 2024
    On Fri, 05 Jul 2024 15:33:40 -0600, John Savard
    <[email protected]d> wrote:

    On Fri, 05 Jul 2024 08:18:09 -0700, Paul S Person ><[email protected]d> wrote:

    1. Certain people believe -- firmly, passionately, and religiously
    believe -- that We Are Not Alone. This /must/ be true, they say, it
    just /must/ be true.

    That's not _too_ unreasonable a belief. After all, _we_ exist.
    Therefore, it is possible for intelligent life to evolve, it is
    possible for life to originate on a planet.

    Life exists. Whether any of it deserves to be called "intelligent" is
    a different question.

    It is an assumption (OK, an hypothesis) that life originated on a
    planet. That two different theories of what the initial conditions on
    Earth were have been tested and shown to produce amino acids (or
    whatever) shows only that it is possible to produce a theory that can
    survive a laboratory test. That the initial conditions can be
    different and the result the same suggests that we have no real idea
    of what is needed at all.

    So, if this is possible to happen naturally here, it's possible
    elsewhere.

    And the Universe is a very big place.

    It's just that we have no way to know just _how_ "not alone" we are.
    Are there hundreds of civilizations in the typical galaxy... or is our >civilization the only one, not only in this galaxy, but also for
    hundreds of galaxies?

    And in the latter case, if it's also true that faster-than-light
    travel is utterly impossible... first contact may be a long way off.

    Actual first contact is a long way off even if our own galaxy is
    packed with space aliens. That's why we've cleverly decided which
    radio frequency they are using to try to advise us of their presence.
    Too bad nobody's using it.
    --
    "Here lies the Tuscan poet Aretino,
    Who evil spoke of everyone but God,
    Giving as his excuse, 'I never knew him.'"

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul S Person@21:1/5 to Titus G on Sat Jul 6 09:37:59 2024
    On Sat, 6 Jul 2024 10:24:52 +1200, Titus G <[email protected]> wrote:

    Much snippage.

    On 6/07/24 03:18, Paul S Person wrote:
    1. Certain people believe -- firmly, passionately, and religiously
    believe -- that We Are Not Alone. This /must/ be true, they say, it
    just /must/ be true.

    You seem to be implying that all such people are nutters but my general >understanding is that many credible believers do so because of
    statistics, the incomprehensible, to me, number of planets possible. >Restricting that to a further three in a thousand will not change that >belief.

    They /are/ nutters. They literally have no idea at all what they are
    talking about. It is all smoke and mirrors.

    I once sparked a never-ending thread "Jesus Holds the Atoms Together"
    on another newsgroup while working my way through an early "proof"
    that we only exist because a certain set of constants have the values
    they have by observing that a term denoting "probability that
    universes in which the values would not allow life but life
    nonetheless exists" appeared in a /denominator/. Since the value of
    that should be "0", this blew up the entire argument (the value of the
    term it was in was now "undefined" since that is what division by 0
    gets you, and so everything it was connected to was also "undefined").
    The thread explored the theory that such universes /do/ exist and we
    are in one. We exist (the theory continued) because God Himself forces
    each and every one of the constants into a value (and a set of values collectively) that allows life to exist.

    Nutters are nutters. They are everywhere. Most of them are quite
    harmless. Many are a having lot of fun. Some are not.

    We now have nutters that support terrorism and hate Jews on /both/
    ends of the political spectrum. Those are not harmless.

    But nutters desperately looking for reasons why, in a Universe
    allegedly teeming with life, we hare having such a hard time finding
    it, are harmless.

    Adam Roberts addresses and solves the Fermi Paradox in the final part of
    Jack Glass.
    --
    "Here lies the Tuscan poet Aretino,
    Who evil spoke of everyone but God,
    Giving as his excuse, 'I never knew him.'"

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul S Person@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Sun Jul 7 08:48:12 2024
    XPost: alt.fan.heinlein

    On Sat, 6 Jul 2024 13:37:04 -0400, Cryptoengineer
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 7/6/2024 12:36 PM, Cryptoengineer wrote:
    On 7/4/2024 10:25 PM, Dimensional Traveler wrote:
    On 7/4/2024 4:49 PM, a425couple wrote:
    On 7/4/24 12:33, Dimensional Traveler wrote:
    On 7/4/2024 9:54 AM, a425couple wrote:
    Big DEAL !!
    So many times greats like Heinlein and Silverberg have written
    about us going to exoplanets, and it being like Earth.
    Sorry,,,, NO!

    from
    https://www.universetoday.com/167659/plate-tectonics-might-only-occur-on-0-003-of-planets-that-makes-earth-very-special-indeed/

    Plate tectonics: Image Credit: NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center
    Scientific Visualization Studio
    POSTED ONJULY 2, 2024 BY SCOTT ALAN JOHNSTON

    -----------snip-------

    Go to the citation for the rest ----.

    I went to the citation but couldn't find if that 0.003% is of ALL
    exo-planets or just the Terrestrial/Super-Terrestrial types.


    "the rest" of the citation, did not give a lot of specific information. >>>> Hopefully we will see a lot more on this research in the future.

    I also think there's a flaw in their basic assumptions.� If you have a
    rocky planet with a liquid core/mantle, you are going to have plate
    tectonics.

    Neither Mercury, Venus, nor Mars have plate tectonics. That's 3/4
    of the rocky planets with a liquid core/mantel, that we know about.


    Bizzare. Thunderbird (or Eternal-September) is messing up. I didn't mean
    to duplicate the post, but I put up the same info yesterday, but didn't
    see it the first time I opened TB today, so reposted.

    I don't seem to have that problem with Agent 8 and Eternal September,
    so perhaps Thunderbird needs investigation.
    --
    "Here lies the Tuscan poet Aretino,
    Who evil spoke of everyone but God,
    Giving as his excuse, 'I never knew him.'"

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Kualinar@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jul 8 12:32:01 2024
    XPost: alt.fan.heinlein, alt.astronomy

    Le 2024-07-05 à 16:40, a425couple a écrit :
    On 7/4/24 19:25, Dimensional Traveler wrote:
    On 7/4/2024 4:49 PM, a425couple wrote:
    On 7/4/24 12:33, Dimensional Traveler wrote:
    On 7/4/2024 9:54 AM, a425couple wrote:
    Big DEAL !!
    So many times greats like Heinlein and Silverberg have written
    about us going to exoplanets, and it being like Earth.
    Sorry,,,, NO!

    from
    https://www.universetoday.com/167659/plate-tectonics-might-only-occur-on-0-003-of-planets-that-makes-earth-very-special-indeed/

    Plate tectonics: Image Credit: NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center
    Scientific Visualization Studio
    POSTED ONJULY 2, 2024 BY SCOTT ALAN JOHNSTON

    -----------snip-------

    Go to the citation for the rest ----.

    I went to the citation but couldn't find if that 0.003% is of ALL
    exo-planets or just the Terrestrial/Super-Terrestrial types.


    "the rest" of the citation, did not give a lot of specific information.
    Hopefully we will see a lot more on this research in the future.

    I also think there's a flaw in their basic assumptions.  If you have a
    rocky planet with a liquid core/mantle, you are going to have plate
    tectonics.

    resending----

    Ahhh,,,, ??
    I do not know about that.  Needs to get more detailed.
    Take Mars, the closest and most explored example.
    It has pretty much lost internal movement,
    thus magnetic waves that protect it from
    solar waves, and the solar wind has wiped off
    most atmosphere, and water.

    Question Does Mars have plate tectonics?

    Mars, it seems, once had active tectonic plates spreading away from
    long, narrow volcanic rifts, according to two reports in tomorrow's
    Science (pp.
    https://www.science.org › content › article › past-tecton...
    Past Tectonics on Mars? | Science | AAAS

    Why doesn't Mars have plate tectonics?
    Shaping the Planets: Tectonism
    Like Earth, Venus and Mars are believed to have hot interiors. This
    means that they are continuing to lose heat. While their surfaces show evidence of recent deformation — tectonism — neither planet has plate tectonic activity because neither planet has a surface divided into plates.

    Shaping the Planets: Tectonism - Lunar and Planetary Institute
    Lunar and Planetary Institute

    What planets have plate tectonics?

    Why Earth is the only planet with plate tectonics - Big Think
    Here in our Solar System, of all the known planets, only Earth — not Mercury, not Venus, and not Mars — is known to possess plate
    tectonics.Mar 27, 2023

    How Mars Lost Its Magnetic Field—and Then Its Oceans - JSTOR Daily
    JSTOR Daily
    https://daily.jstor.org › how-mars-lost-its-magnetic-field-...
    Search for: Why did Mars lose its magnetic field?

    Mars have about the same average density as the Earth, BUT, the radius
    of Mars is about 0.6 Earth radius.
    That mean about 0.216 Earth mass and about 0.36 of the surface. This
    resulted in a much faster cooling. It should be noted that the initial temperature of the inside of Mars was probably lower as it accumulated
    less energy during it's accretion. That also mean a lot less heat from
    nuclear decay. So, it's interior cooled, causing the core to become
    thick, thus stopping the magnetic field generating process.
    The loss of it's magnetic field only accelerated the loss of it's
    atmosphere. Remember that the Martian escape velocity is about a third
    of Earth's escape velocity. That alone mean loosing it's atmosphere.

    For Earth, we now have reasons to think that plate tectonics got
    initiated by the collision that formed the Moon. Then, the tidal pull
    from the Moon may have helped kipping it running.
    Venus seems to never experience such a collision, so, nothing to kick
    start it's plate tectonics. The Venusian crust it possibly thinner than
    Earth's crust, as the insulation provided by it's very thick atmosphere
    must slow down it's cooling.

    There is a model where Mercury would be the core of an Uranus like
    planet that evaporated due to it's proximity to the Sun.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Joy Beeson@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Mon Aug 19 21:31:52 2024
    On Fri, 05 Jul 2024 15:20:26 -0600, John Savard
    <[email protected]d> wrote:

    And I agree with Arthur C. Clarke, that advanced aliens are more
    likely to be benificent.

    According to *their* ideas of beneficent.

    --
    Joy Beeson
    joy beeson at centurylink dot net

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Robert Woodward@21:1/5 to Joy Beeson on Mon Aug 19 21:45:04 2024
    In article <[email protected]>,
    Joy Beeson <[email protected]d> wrote:

    On Fri, 05 Jul 2024 15:20:26 -0600, John Savard <[email protected]d> wrote:

    And I agree with Arthur C. Clarke, that advanced aliens are more
    likely to be benificent.

    According to *their* ideas of beneficent.

    A quote from _The Termopylae Protocol_ by Weber and Holo:

    "... you and I were both historians. When's the last time large-scale
    contact between two societies--one significantly less advanced than the other--ended well for the little guys?"
    "Um..."
    "Yeah. My point exactly."

    --
    "We have advanced to new and surprising levels of bafflement."
    Imperial Auditor Miles Vorkosigan describes progress in _Komarr_. -------------------------------------------------------
    Robert Woodward [email protected]

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bobbie Sellers@21:1/5 to All on Thu Sep 5 21:08:32 2024
    On 7/4/24 09:54, a425couple wrote:
    Big DEAL !!
    So many times greats like Heinlein and Silverberg have written
    about us going to exoplanets, and it being like Earth.
    Sorry,,,, NO!

    from https://www.universetoday.com/167659/plate-tectonics-might-only-occur-on-0-003-of-planets-that-makes-earth-very-special-indeed/

    Plate tectonics: Image Credit: NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center
    Scientific Visualization Studio
    POSTED ONJULY 2, 2024 BY SCOTT ALAN JOHNSTON

    Plate Tectonics Might Only Occur on 0.003% of Planets. That Makes Earth
    Very Special Indeed.
    Plate tectonics, oceans, and continents might just be the secret
    ingredients for complex life on Earth. And if these geological features
    are rare elsewhere in the universe, then perhaps that explains why we haven’t yet discovered intelligent alien life. New research from
    American and Swiss Earth scientists suggests that these ingredients
    represent missing variables in the famous Drake equation, devised more
    than half a century ago to estimate the chances of finding advanced civilizations in our galaxy. Including these new variables could
    completely rewrite the probability of detecting intelligent life in the
    Milky Way.

    Go to the citation for the rest ----.

    Life is likely everywhere liquid water is found but it won't
    be necessarily intelligent or complex. Remember that a Mars-sized
    planet had to hit the earth to create the Moon. When it did that
    it may have kicked up the abyssal ancient prokaryotic cells which
    on finding themselves in a very strange environment formed the
    bacterial mats which led to the first great extinction by producing oxygen.
    Without the higher biological energies produced and enabled
    by the presence of Oxygen we might not have gotten far enough to
    spoil it with tailpipe emissions.
    Not to mention the presence of the Moon which with its tides
    may have given rise to life on land.
    I think PBS has one show or series entitled "Disaster Planet"
    and without disasters we might not have grown, an overly large perhaps,
    brain.

    bliss

    --
    b l i s s - S F 4 e v e r at D S L E x t r e m e dot com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)