• (WFC) The Truth of the Aleke by Moses Ose Utomi

    From James Nicoll@21:1/5 to All on Fri May 17 13:16:25 2024
    The Truth of the Aleke (Forever Desert, volume 2) by Moses Ose Utomi

    In the tradition of too many heroes to name individually, a determined
    young man ignores the admonitions of his hidebound elders to do that
    which the young man is certain must be right.

    https://jamesdavisnicoll.com/review/face-the-truth
    --
    My reviews can be found at http://jamesdavisnicoll.com/
    My tor pieces at https://www.tor.com/author/james-davis-nicoll/
    My Dreamwidth at https://james-davis-nicoll.dreamwidth.org/
    My patreon is at https://www.patreon.com/jamesdnicoll

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Savard@21:1/5 to Nicoll on Mon May 20 11:11:44 2024
    On Fri, 17 May 2024 13:16:25 -0000 (UTC), [email protected] (James
    Nicoll) wrote:

    The Truth of the Aleke (Forever Desert, volume 2) by Moses Ose Utomi

    In the tradition of too many heroes to name individually, a determined
    young man ignores the admonitions of his hidebound elders to do that
    which the young man is certain must be right.

    https://jamesdavisnicoll.com/review/face-the-truth

    From reading the review, it seemed as if he was acting entirely at the
    behest of his elders... after the earlier incident which set up the
    main story.

    Not having read the book, my first guess was that he would find out
    that that his side was the aggressor, and the Cult were the good guys.

    But since this starts off with a cruel attack on peaceful people, that
    seemed unlikely.

    Instead, the review seems to suggest that the problem is that even
    with the power of a God's Eye, killing the Aleke and destroying the
    Cult thereby was just too big a mission for any one man, even the
    protagonist, given that the author is focused on realism instead of
    escapism.

    Even perhaps more fitting - and even potentially relevant to
    contemporary politics - would be if he were to find that fulfilling
    his mission would create such chaos that the outcome would be worse
    for his people than the current status quo. Some things in the review
    suggest this possibility.

    I presume this book was written for an African audience, and unlike
    Americans, these people don't have the feeling of security that comes
    with having one's country's currency as the world's reserve currency,
    and having a history of stable democracy of over two centuries, and of
    having unparalleled industrial and military might, including nuclear
    armaments and a credible second-strike capability.

    Such an audience might well have a different standard for what
    constitutes the necessary level of gritty realism in a story to remove
    it from the category of unrealistic over-optimistic wish-fulfillment
    fantasy than an American audience.

    Perhaps more... instructive... to Western audiences would be African
    SF that met with the approval of an African John W. Campbell. That is,
    stories in the "Africa conquers the world" vein. In contrast, a story
    like _The Truth of the Aleke_ seems likely to be dismissed as a
    peculiar thing from a strange culture, but lacking in entertainment
    value. But not necessarily; if it was well-written enough to merit a
    review by James Nicoll, maybe its value as literature, in things like
    how its protagonist is characterized, will earn it recognition.

    John Savard

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Savard@21:1/5 to All on Mon May 20 11:42:34 2024
    After using James Nicoll's review of a novel which I have not read or
    even seen as a psychological projective test, I was going to further
    compound my sins by discussing Dhalgren by Samuel R. Delaney.

    However, I hadn't managed to slog through the entire work, so I was
    going to just discuss what I vividly remembered from the part that I
    had read. (I was going to avoid naming the book or the author,
    although I believe it would have been recognizable.)

    Having, however, first looked at the Wikipedia article on the book, I
    learned two things.

    I had not read enough of the book to connect to what its primary plot
    was.

    And that its author, Samuel R. Delaney, was black. As that materially
    impacts the scathing comments I was going to make about the book, what
    I might have posted is no longer relevant.

    Instead, I will limit myself to incredulity that a black author would
    choose to perpetuate one of the most vicious and evil stereotypes
    about black people in existence. (A defense exists: that the
    stereotype has some basis in truth, _but only because black people are
    human_ - yes, some black people do bad things, but no more so than
    anyone else would, particularly under similar circumstances. The
    riposte is, of course, but did you really think white readers would be sophisticated enough to understand that?)

    John Savard

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)