Starting with [https://www.washingtonpost.com/doonesbury/strip/archive/2024/2/27]It shows 1900 when I bring it up. And it is part of a continuing series.
we appear to be seeing a /new/ daily sequence!
Note: that link works here, which is a big surprise since a firewall
usually appears, but if you get a firewall, try [https://www.washingtonpost.com/doonesbury/] for today's strip.
Note that the current strip shows no date. The archived strips show
[1900] -- which is a bit old, even for Doonesbury.
On 2/29/24 08:26, Paul S Person wrote:
Starting withIt shows 1900 when I bring it up. And it is part of a continuing series.
[https://www.washingtonpost.com/doonesbury/strip/archive/2024/2/27]
we appear to be seeing a /new/ daily sequence!
Note: that link works here, which is a big surprise since a firewall
usually appears, but if you get a firewall, try
[https://www.washingtonpost.com/doonesbury/] for today's strip.
Note that the current strip shows no date. The archived strips show
[1900] -- which is a bit old, even for Doonesbury.
On Fri, 1 Mar 2024 16:05:17 -0800, BCFD 36 <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2/29/24 08:26, Paul S Person wrote:firewall >> usually appears, but if you get a firewall, try
Starting with
[https://www.washingtonpost.com/doonesbury/strip/archive/2024/2/27]
we appear to be seeing a new daily sequence!
Note: that link works here, which is a big surprise since a
[https://www.washingtonpost.com/doonesbury/] for today's strip.It shows 1900 when I bring it up. And it is part of a continuing
Note that the current strip shows no date. The archived strips show
[1900] -- which is a bit old, even for Doonesbury.
series.
The current one references "President Clinton", so apparently it's not
new, just not dated properly.
Paul S Person wrote:
On Fri, 1 Mar 2024 16:05:17 -0800, BCFD 36 <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2/29/24 08:26, Paul S Person wrote:firewall >> usually appears, but if you get a firewall, try
Starting with
[https://www.washingtonpost.com/doonesbury/strip/archive/2024/2/27]
we appear to be seeing a new daily sequence!
Note: that link works here, which is a big surprise since a
[https://www.washingtonpost.com/doonesbury/] for today's strip.It shows 1900 when I bring it up. And it is part of a continuing
Note that the current strip shows no date. The archived strips show
[1900] -- which is a bit old, even for Doonesbury.
series.
The current one references "President Clinton", so apparently it's not
new, just not dated properly.
The original was from 2000:
https://www.gocomics.com/doonesbury/2000/11/21
On Tue, 5 Mar 2024 07:33:54 -0000 (UTC), "Default User" <[email protected]> wrote:
The original was from 2000:
https://www.gocomics.com/doonesbury/2000/11/21
Thanks for confirming this.
I guess they've stopped marking them with the original publication
date.
Or I've imagined them so marking them all these years since Trudeau
stopped doing new daily strips.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 715 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 29:57:44 |
| Calls: | 12,108 |
| Calls today: | 8 |
| Files: | 15,006 |
| Messages: | 6,518,256 |