XPost: alt.arts.poetry.comments, alt.poetry
On Tue, 14 Jan 2025 14:26:13 +0000, George J. Dance wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jan 2025 19:39:39 +0000, Michael Monkey Peabrain aka
"HarryLime" wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jan 2025 14:14:13 +0000, George J. Dance wrote:
Penny's Blog (s 16)
page 59, The Parterre, Passing away,
The Passing of Summer, The Passing of the Year,
Passion, The Passionate Shepherd to His Love,
A Pastoral, The Pastoral Pilgrim, A Patch of Old Snow,
[...]
https://gdancesbetty.blogspot.com/2025/01/pennys-blog-s-16.html
OMFG!
You're writing a "poem" consisting of the first lines of each of the
poems that you've posted on your blog???
No, Michael. First, those are called "titles". The title isn't actually
a line in the poem. (When a poem is untitled or numbered, I will use the actual first line, but there's none of that in the quote. Second,
version 1.0 of the poem (the print version) is already written; I'm just posting it over the month.
I'm sorry, George. I was giving you the benefit of the doubt.
I'm reminded of an episode of "The Honeymooners" where Ralph records an
apology to Alice. At a loss for words, Norton passes him a series of
records, so that he can read of the title of each.
Oh well. What can one do, except to throw in another record title: "To
Each His Own."
I don't know whether one should look on this as an example of morbid
self-conceit, a profound anal-retentive pettiness, or a disturbing
mixture of both.
Well, you're the "armchair psychologist," so pick one. Flip a coin, or whatever it is that armchair psychologists do.
Even armchair var. psychologists are wary of drawing rash conclusions.
I will say that I'm leaning toward Door Number Three.
I realize that your Donkey has been obediently braying that it is
"interesting" (Mr. Donkey's go-to word for anything he doesn't
understand), but are you so far gone that you're assigning any value to
his words... er, word?
Sorry, Michael, but I really don't want to play Monkey/Donkey with you
on this thread.
Interesting...
I can't imagine how anyone could choose to engage in such a pointless
waste of time.
Well, I admit it's no "Slurp Puppet" - but then I couldn't imagine
anyone in their right mind spending the time to write something like
that, either.
The "Slurp Puppet" poem was an enjoyable exercise, wherein the
participants where able to hone their poetic skills. NancyGene would
write several verses a day, which I would continue/expand on. We were
pushing one another to come up with witty (or, at least, funny) lines on
a daily basis.
I feel that I benefited from it immensely.
You really should consult a therapist. Canada must
provide free, or at least affordable, mental health services.
Perhaps your armchair colleague can fly in to Toronto again. Maybe this
time their balloon won't end up in the Yukon and get shot down.
I'm afraid that I don't recognize your reference. Was this some
"humorous" scenario you'd made up about Dr. NancyGene in the past?
--
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)