On Tue, 29 Jul 2025 18:10:22 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701 <[email protected]>
wrote:
So Sydney Sweeney made an ad for American Eagle where she fixes and drives >> cars in a pair of their blue genes while showing off the assets that she's >> known for. The voiceover says, "Sydney Sweeney has great jeans":
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1950185359188336640/vid/avc1/720x1280/CQiTj3CTYsoK0yka.mp4?tag=21
Get it? The play on words where they conflate the comfort and look of the
jeans with the genes that gave her that cleavage, figure, and amazing ass. >>
Pretty clever ad and certainly eye-catching.
But to the leftist pundit-sphere and the frothing reactionaries on the
exTwitters and the Facebooks, this ad is nothing short of literal Nazi white >> supremacy propaganda. You see, the ad wasn't referring to Sweeney's
cantaloupes when it said she has good jeans, they breathlessly inform us.
They
were talking about how being white, blonde, and blue-eyed is beautiful and >> (of
course) any kind of pride or praise for someone experiencing the horrible
condition of whiteness is nazism! Nazism, I say!
Of course, if the women pictured below made a similar ad and extolled the
benefits of 'good genes', no one would say it's 'Nazi' and 'fascist'.
https://ibb.co/MxHFVNrQ
Just another example of "It's only bad when white people do it".
If weren't for double standards, the Left would have no standards at all.
The world has completely lost its mind.
On 2025-07-29 18:24:45 +0000, shawn said:
I can easily see that the people behind the commercial never considered
how their message would match up with the Nazi message or they would
have changed it.
Even if you were born 60 years after Hitler's time like these ad
copywriters probably were you'd have to be pretty clueless not to
realize the possible repercussions of a "good jeans/genes" double
entendre.
shawn <[email protected]> wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jul 2025 22:39:15 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman"
<[email protected]> wrote:
Rhino <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2025-07-30 6:14 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
shawn <[email protected]> wrote:
Wed, 30 Jul 2025 14:23:41 -0500, super70s <[email protected]d>: >>>>>>>2025-07-29 18:24:45 +0000, shawn said:
I can easily see that the people behind the commercial never considered >>>>>>>>how their message would match up with the Nazi message or they would >>>>>>>>have changed it.
Even if you were born 60 years after Hitler's time like these ad >>>>>>>copywriters probably were you'd have to be pretty clueless not to >>>>>>>realize the possible repercussions of a "good jeans/genes" double >>>>>>>entendre.
Given that we have people who are suggesting the holocaust never >>>>>>happened. They truly have convinced themselves it didn't happen. This >>>>>>seems especially prevalent amongst the youngest adults so I could see >>>>>>people who never made the connection between "good genes' and a >>>>>>potential Nazi connection.
Until I read thread thread, I had made no connection whatsoever between >>>>>the use of puns and the fact that the Nazis invented eugenics.
According to Wikipedia, the "science" of eugenics was not invented by >>>>the Nazis.
I didn't say that they had. (Nazi propoganda said the Nazis invented >>>everything.) I'm saying that this thread proves that making of puns was >>>an evil the Nazis perpetrated on the world because of their association >>>with eugenics.
They point out claims in Plutarch that said the Spartans were
the first practitioners and that other Greeks *did* practice infanticide. >>>
Apparently the modern founder of eugenics, and the man who coined the >>>>term, was a Brit named Francis Galton, a half-cousin of Charles Darwin.
There were plenty of elites in science and medicine who considered that >>>for the good of humanity the species could be improved through selective >>>breeding and assination. Please consider the research papers of Gilbert >>>and Sullivan.
Therefore, blaming it on the Nazis is quite inaccurate.
I am claiming that I learned how puns were weaponized.
By the way, I
understand that American Margaret Sanger was also quite enthusiastic >>>>about eugenics before WWII.
Ir's hard to name an elite who should have known better who hadn't
jumped on the bandwagon.
Do you think support for eugenics has gone away? We get ever closer to >>>making the technology practical. Someone will force its implimentation.
The difference being that instead of improving the species through
killing people it may be that we improve the species by making gene
editing available to everyone (though clearly starting with the rich.)
Difference without meaning, shawn. If you believe there are no long-term >negative consequences from eugenics, read pretty much any science
fiction novel exploring the concept.
On 2025-07-30 6:14 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
shawn <[email protected]> wrote:
Wed, 30 Jul 2025 14:23:41 -0500, super70s <[email protected]d>:
2025-07-29 18:24:45 +0000, shawn said:
I can easily see that the people behind the commercial never considered >>>>> how their message would match up with the Nazi message or they would >>>>> have changed it.
Even if you were born 60 years after Hitler's time like these ad
copywriters probably were you'd have to be pretty clueless not to
realize the possible repercussions of a "good jeans/genes" double
entendre.
Given that we have people who are suggesting the holocaust never
happened. They truly have convinced themselves it didn't happen. This
seems especially prevalent amongst the youngest adults so I could see
people who never made the connection between "good genes' and a
potential Nazi connection.
Until I read thread thread, I had made no connection whatsoever between
the use of puns and the fact that the Nazis invented eugenics.
According to Wikipedia, the "science" of eugenics was not invented by
the Nazis. They point out claims in Plutarch that said the Spartans were
the first practitioners and that other Greeks *did* practice infanticide.
Apparently the modern founder of eugenics, and the man who coined the
term, was a Brit named Francis Galton, a half-cousin of Charles Darwin.
Therefore, blaming it on the Nazis is quite inaccurate. By the way, I >understand that American Margaret Sanger was also quite enthusiastic
about eugenics before WWII.
On Jul 30, 2025 at 4:22:30 AM PDT, "NoBody" <[email protected]> wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jul 2025 18:10:22 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701 <[email protected]>
wrote:
So Sydney Sweeney made an ad for American Eagle where she fixes and drives >>> cars in a pair of their blue genes while showing off the assets that she's >>> known for. The voiceover says, "Sydney Sweeney has great jeans":
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1950185359188336640/vid/avc1/720x1280/CQiTj3CTYsoK0yka.mp4?tag=21
Get it? The play on words where they conflate the comfort and look of the >>> jeans with the genes that gave her that cleavage, figure, and amazing ass. >>>
Pretty clever ad and certainly eye-catching.
But to the leftist pundit-sphere and the frothing reactionaries on the
exTwitters and the Facebooks, this ad is nothing short of literal Nazi white
supremacy propaganda. You see, the ad wasn't referring to Sweeney's
cantaloupes when it said she has good jeans, they breathlessly inform us. >>> They
were talking about how being white, blonde, and blue-eyed is beautiful and >>> (of
course) any kind of pride or praise for someone experiencing the horrible >>> condition of whiteness is nazism! Nazism, I say!
Of course, if the women pictured below made a similar ad and extolled the >>> benefits of 'good genes', no one would say it's 'Nazi' and 'fascist'.
https://ibb.co/MxHFVNrQ
Just another example of "It's only bad when white people do it".
If weren't for double standards, the Left would have no standards at all. >>>
The world has completely lost its mind.
Sweeney should have just leaned into it with something like this:
https://ibb.co/S476XYbN
Then watched half the leftist intelligentsia seize up and stroke out.
Rhino <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2025-07-30 6:14 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
shawn <[email protected]> wrote:
Wed, 30 Jul 2025 14:23:41 -0500, super70s <[email protected]d>: >>>>> 2025-07-29 18:24:45 +0000, shawn said:
I can easily see that the people behind the commercial never considered >>>>>> how their message would match up with the Nazi message or they would >>>>>> have changed it.
Even if you were born 60 years after Hitler's time like these ad
copywriters probably were you'd have to be pretty clueless not to
realize the possible repercussions of a "good jeans/genes" double
entendre.
Given that we have people who are suggesting the holocaust never
happened. They truly have convinced themselves it didn't happen. This
seems especially prevalent amongst the youngest adults so I could see
people who never made the connection between "good genes' and a
potential Nazi connection.
Until I read thread thread, I had made no connection whatsoever between
the use of puns and the fact that the Nazis invented eugenics.
According to Wikipedia, the "science" of eugenics was not invented by
the Nazis.
I didn't say that they had. (Nazi propoganda said the Nazis invented everything.) I'm saying that this thread proves that making of puns was
an evil the Nazis perpetrated on the world because of their association
with eugenics.
They point out claims in Plutarch that said the Spartans were
the first practitioners and that other Greeks *did* practice infanticide.
Apparently the modern founder of eugenics, and the man who coined the
term, was a Brit named Francis Galton, a half-cousin of Charles Darwin.
There were plenty of elites in science and medicine who considered that
for the good of humanity the species could be improved through selective breeding and assination.
On Jul 30, 2025 at 3:39:15 PM PDT, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <[email protected]> wrote:
Rhino <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2025-07-30 6:14 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
shawn <[email protected]> wrote:
Wed, 30 Jul 2025 14:23:41 -0500, super70s <[email protected]d>: >>>>>> 2025-07-29 18:24:45 +0000, shawn said:
I can easily see that the people behind the commercial never considered >>>>>>> how their message would match up with the Nazi message or they would >>>>>>> have changed it.
Even if you were born 60 years after Hitler's time like these ad
copywriters probably were you'd have to be pretty clueless not to
realize the possible repercussions of a "good jeans/genes" double
entendre.
Given that we have people who are suggesting the holocaust never
happened. They truly have convinced themselves it didn't happen. This >>>>> seems especially prevalent amongst the youngest adults so I could see >>>>> people who never made the connection between "good genes' and a
potential Nazi connection.
Until I read thread thread, I had made no connection whatsoever between >>>> the use of puns and the fact that the Nazis invented eugenics.
According to Wikipedia, the "science" of eugenics was not invented by
the Nazis.
I didn't say that they had. (Nazi propoganda said the Nazis invented
everything.) I'm saying that this thread proves that making of puns was
an evil the Nazis perpetrated on the world because of their association
with eugenics.
They point out claims in Plutarch that said the Spartans were
the first practitioners and that other Greeks *did* practice infanticide. >>
Apparently the modern founder of eugenics, and the man who coined the
term, was a Brit named Francis Galton, a half-cousin of Charles Darwin.
There were plenty of elites in science and medicine who considered that
for the good of humanity the species could be improved through selective
breeding and assination.
I have often wondered why it's both scientifically proven and common practice in the agriculture and ranching world that selective breeding *does* improve all manner of species-- from cattle to corn to race horses-- but for some reason it's been decreed to not work with humans and we're never to speak about it.
On Thu, 31 Jul 2025 05:36:21 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701 <[email protected]>
wrote:
On Jul 30, 2025 at 4:22:30 AM PDT, "NoBody" <[email protected]> wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jul 2025 18:10:22 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701 <[email protected]>
wrote:
So Sydney Sweeney made an ad for American Eagle where she fixes and drivesThe world has completely lost its mind.
cars in a pair of their blue genes while showing off the assets that she's
known for. The voiceover says, "Sydney Sweeney has great jeans":
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1950185359188336640/vid/avc1/720x1280/CQiTj3CTYsoK0yka.mp4?tag=21
Get it? The play on words where they conflate the comfort and look of the >>>> jeans with the genes that gave her that cleavage, figure, and amazing ass.
Pretty clever ad and certainly eye-catching.
But to the leftist pundit-sphere and the frothing reactionaries on the >>>> exTwitters and the Facebooks, this ad is nothing short of literal Nazi white
supremacy propaganda. You see, the ad wasn't referring to Sweeney's
cantaloupes when it said she has good jeans, they breathlessly inform us. >>>> They were talking about how being white, blonde, and blue-eyed is
beautiful and
(of course) any kind of pride or praise for someone experiencing the
horrible
condition of whiteness is nazism! Nazism, I say!
Of course, if the women pictured below made a similar ad and extolled the >>>> benefits of 'good genes', no one would say it's 'Nazi' and 'fascist'. >>>>
https://ibb.co/MxHFVNrQ
Just another example of "It's only bad when white people do it".
If weren't for double standards, the Left would have no standards at all. >>>>
Sweeney should have just leaned into it with something like this:
https://ibb.co/S476XYbN
Then watched half the leftist intelligentsia seize up and stroke out.
Change the race and the New York Times would have advocated for
exactly this.
On 7/31/2025 1:26 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Jul 30, 2025 at 3:39:15 PM PDT, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <[email protected]>
wrote:
Rhino <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2025-07-30 6:14 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
shawn <[email protected]> wrote:
Wed, 30 Jul 2025 14:23:41 -0500, super70s <[email protected]d>: >>>>>>> 2025-07-29 18:24:45 +0000, shawn said:
I can easily see that the people behind the commercial never considered
how their message would match up with the Nazi message or they would >>>>>>>> have changed it.
Even if you were born 60 years after Hitler's time like these ad >>>>>>> copywriters probably were you'd have to be pretty clueless not to >>>>>>> realize the possible repercussions of a "good jeans/genes" double >>>>>>> entendre.
Given that we have people who are suggesting the holocaust never
happened. They truly have convinced themselves it didn't happen. This >>>>>> seems especially prevalent amongst the youngest adults so I could see >>>>>> people who never made the connection between "good genes' and a
potential Nazi connection.
Until I read thread thread, I had made no connection whatsoever between >>>>> the use of puns and the fact that the Nazis invented eugenics.
According to Wikipedia, the "science" of eugenics was not invented by >>>> the Nazis.
I didn't say that they had. (Nazi propoganda said the Nazis invented
everything.) I'm saying that this thread proves that making of puns was >>> an evil the Nazis perpetrated on the world because of their association >>> with eugenics.
They point out claims in Plutarch that said the Spartans wereThere were plenty of elites in science and medicine who considered that >>> for the good of humanity the species could be improved through selective >>> breeding and assination.
the first practitioners and that other Greeks *did* practice infanticide. >>>
Apparently the modern founder of eugenics, and the man who coined the >>>> term, was a Brit named Francis Galton, a half-cousin of Charles Darwin. >>>
I have often wondered why it's both scientifically proven and common
practice
in the agriculture and ranching world that selective breeding *does* improve
all manner of species-- from cattle to corn to race horses-- but for some >> reason it's been decreed to not work with humans and we're never to speak >> about it.
It's because speaking about it leads to doing it, and we have a
religious conviction that that's wrong,
On Wed, 30 Jul 2025 14:23:41 -0500, super70s
<[email protected]d> wrote:
On 2025-07-29 18:24:45 +0000, shawn said:
I can easily see that the people behind the commercial never considered >>> how their message would match up with the Nazi message or they would
have changed it.
Even if you were born 60 years after Hitler's time like these ad
copywriters probably were you'd have to be pretty clueless not to
realize the possible repercussions of a "good jeans/genes" double
entendre.
Laughter!
Are you so clueless as to not know that "good genes" has been used as
a term for next to forever? It has zippo to do with Nazis.
On Jul 31, 2025 at 12:55:09 PM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote:
On 7/31/2025 1:26 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Jul 30, 2025 at 3:39:15 PM PDT, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <[email protected]>
wrote:
Rhino <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2025-07-30 6:14 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
shawn <[email protected]> wrote:
Wed, 30 Jul 2025 14:23:41 -0500, super70s <[email protected]d>: >>>>>>>> 2025-07-29 18:24:45 +0000, shawn said:
I can easily see that the people behind the commercial never considered
how their message would match up with the Nazi message or they would >>>>>>>>> have changed it.
Even if you were born 60 years after Hitler's time like these ad >>>>>>>> copywriters probably were you'd have to be pretty clueless not to >>>>>>>> realize the possible repercussions of a "good jeans/genes" double >>>>>>>> entendre.
Given that we have people who are suggesting the holocaust never >>>>>>> happened. They truly have convinced themselves it didn't happen. This >>>>>>> seems especially prevalent amongst the youngest adults so I could see >>>>>>> people who never made the connection between "good genes' and a
potential Nazi connection.
Until I read thread thread, I had made no connection whatsoever between >>>>>> the use of puns and the fact that the Nazis invented eugenics.
According to Wikipedia, the "science" of eugenics was not invented by >>>>> the Nazis.
I didn't say that they had. (Nazi propoganda said the Nazis invented
everything.) I'm saying that this thread proves that making of puns was >>>> an evil the Nazis perpetrated on the world because of their association >>>> with eugenics.
They point out claims in Plutarch that said the Spartans wereThere were plenty of elites in science and medicine who considered that >>>> for the good of humanity the species could be improved through selective >>>> breeding and assination.
the first practitioners and that other Greeks *did* practice infanticide. >>>>
Apparently the modern founder of eugenics, and the man who coined the >>>>> term, was a Brit named Francis Galton, a half-cousin of Charles Darwin. >>>>
I have often wondered why it's both scientifically proven and common
practice
in the agriculture and ranching world that selective breeding *does* improve
all manner of species-- from cattle to corn to race horses-- but for some >>> reason it's been decreed to not work with humans and we're never to speak >>> about it.
It's because speaking about it leads to doing it, and we have a
religious conviction that that's wrong,
What about those of us that aren't religious?
On Jul 31, 2025 at 12:55:09 PM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote:
On 7/31/2025 1:26 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Jul 30, 2025 at 3:39:15 PM PDT, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <[email protected]> >>> wrote:
Rhino <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2025-07-30 6:14 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
shawn <[email protected]> wrote:
Wed, 30 Jul 2025 14:23:41 -0500, super70s <[email protected]d>:
2025-07-29 18:24:45 +0000, shawn said:
I can easily see that the people behind the commercial never considered
how their message would match up with the Nazi message or they would
have changed it.
Even if you were born 60 years after Hitler's time like these ad >>>>>>>> copywriters probably were you'd have to be pretty clueless not to >>>>>>>> realize the possible repercussions of a "good jeans/genes" double >>>>>>>> entendre.
Given that we have people who are suggesting the holocaust never >>>>>>> happened. They truly have convinced themselves it didn't happen. This >>>>>>> seems especially prevalent amongst the youngest adults so I could see >>>>>>> people who never made the connection between "good genes' and a >>>>>>> potential Nazi connection.
Until I read thread thread, I had made no connection whatsoever between
the use of puns and the fact that the Nazis invented eugenics.
According to Wikipedia, the "science" of eugenics was not invented by >>>>> the Nazis.
I didn't say that they had. (Nazi propoganda said the Nazis invented >>>> everything.) I'm saying that this thread proves that making of puns was >>>> an evil the Nazis perpetrated on the world because of their association >>>> with eugenics.
They point out claims in Plutarch that said the Spartans wereThere were plenty of elites in science and medicine who considered that >>>> for the good of humanity the species could be improved through selective >>>> breeding and assination.
the first practitioners and that other Greeks *did* practice infanticide.
Apparently the modern founder of eugenics, and the man who coined the >>>>> term, was a Brit named Francis Galton, a half-cousin of Charles Darwin. >>>>
I have often wondered why it's both scientifically proven and common
practice
in the agriculture and ranching world that selective breeding *does* improve
all manner of species-- from cattle to corn to race horses-- but for some >>> reason it's been decreed to not work with humans and we're never to speak >>> about it.
It's because speaking about it leads to doing it, and we have a
religious conviction that that's wrong,
What about those of us that aren't religious?
On Jul 30, 2025 at 3:39:15 PM PDT, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <[email protected]> wrote:
Rhino <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2025-07-30 6:14 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
shawn <[email protected]> wrote:
Wed, 30 Jul 2025 14:23:41 -0500, super70s <[email protected]d>: >>>>>> 2025-07-29 18:24:45 +0000, shawn said:
I can easily see that the people behind the commercial never considered >>>>>>> how their message would match up with the Nazi message or they would >>>>>>> have changed it.
Even if you were born 60 years after Hitler's time like these ad
copywriters probably were you'd have to be pretty clueless not to
realize the possible repercussions of a "good jeans/genes" double
entendre.
Given that we have people who are suggesting the holocaust never
happened. They truly have convinced themselves it didn't happen. This >>>>> seems especially prevalent amongst the youngest adults so I could see >>>>> people who never made the connection between "good genes' and a
potential Nazi connection.
Until I read thread thread, I had made no connection whatsoever between >>>> the use of puns and the fact that the Nazis invented eugenics.
According to Wikipedia, the "science" of eugenics was not invented by
the Nazis.
I didn't say that they had. (Nazi propoganda said the Nazis invented
everything.) I'm saying that this thread proves that making of puns was
an evil the Nazis perpetrated on the world because of their association
with eugenics.
They point out claims in Plutarch that said the Spartans were
the first practitioners and that other Greeks *did* practice infanticide. >>
Apparently the modern founder of eugenics, and the man who coined the
term, was a Brit named Francis Galton, a half-cousin of Charles Darwin.
There were plenty of elites in science and medicine who considered that
for the good of humanity the species could be improved through selective
breeding and assination.
I have often wondered why it's both scientifically proven and common practice >in the agriculture and ranching world that selective breeding *does* improve >all manner of species-- from cattle to corn to race horses-- but for some >reason it's been decreed to not work with humans and we're never to speak >about it.
. . .
I just saw a version of the ad that I hadn’t seen up to this
point. Sweeney is hugging a dog while talking about her great jeans. The
dog is a GERMAN SHEPHERD!!! A blonde girl with milky-white skin, whose >initials are SS and petting German Shepherd?!?! How much more blatant
can their call for the return of the Reich be?!?!?
BTR1701 <[email protected]> wrote:
On Jul 30, 2025 at 3:39:15 PM PDT, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <[email protected]> wrote: >>
Rhino <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2025-07-30 6:14 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
shawn <[email protected]> wrote:
Wed, 30 Jul 2025 14:23:41 -0500, super70s <[email protected]d>: >>>>>>> 2025-07-29 18:24:45 +0000, shawn said:
I can easily see that the people behind the commercial never considered
how their message would match up with the Nazi message or they would >>>>>>>> have changed it.
Even if you were born 60 years after Hitler's time like these ad >>>>>>> copywriters probably were you'd have to be pretty clueless not to >>>>>>> realize the possible repercussions of a "good jeans/genes" double >>>>>>> entendre.
Given that we have people who are suggesting the holocaust never
happened. They truly have convinced themselves it didn't happen. This >>>>>> seems especially prevalent amongst the youngest adults so I could see >>>>>> people who never made the connection between "good genes' and a
potential Nazi connection.
Until I read thread thread, I had made no connection whatsoever between >>>>> the use of puns and the fact that the Nazis invented eugenics.
According to Wikipedia, the "science" of eugenics was not invented by
the Nazis.
I didn't say that they had. (Nazi propoganda said the Nazis invented
everything.) I'm saying that this thread proves that making of puns was
an evil the Nazis perpetrated on the world because of their association
with eugenics.
They point out claims in Plutarch that said the Spartans wereThere were plenty of elites in science and medicine who considered that
the first practitioners and that other Greeks *did* practice infanticide. >>>
Apparently the modern founder of eugenics, and the man who coined the
term, was a Brit named Francis Galton, a half-cousin of Charles Darwin. >>>
for the good of humanity the species could be improved through selective >>> breeding and assination.
I have often wondered why it's both scientifically proven and common practice >>in the agriculture and ranching world that selective breeding *does* improve >>all manner of species-- from cattle to corn to race horses-- but for some >>reason it's been decreed to not work with humans and we're never to speak >>about it.
You've read the same novels I have.
Adam H. Kerman <[email protected]> wrote:
BTR1701 <[email protected]> wrote:
On Jul 30, 2025 at 3:39:15 PM PDT, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <[email protected]> wrote:
Rhino <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2025-07-30 6:14 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
shawn <[email protected]> wrote:
Wed, 30 Jul 2025 14:23:41 -0500, super70s <[email protected]d>: >>>>>>>> 2025-07-29 18:24:45 +0000, shawn said:
I can easily see that the people behind the commercial never considered
how their message would match up with the Nazi message or they would >>>>>>>>> have changed it.
Even if you were born 60 years after Hitler's time like these ad >>>>>>>> copywriters probably were you'd have to be pretty clueless not to >>>>>>>> realize the possible repercussions of a "good jeans/genes" double >>>>>>>> entendre.
Given that we have people who are suggesting the holocaust never >>>>>>> happened. They truly have convinced themselves it didn't happen. This >>>>>>> seems especially prevalent amongst the youngest adults so I could see >>>>>>> people who never made the connection between "good genes' and a
potential Nazi connection.
Until I read thread thread, I had made no connection whatsoever between >>>>>> the use of puns and the fact that the Nazis invented eugenics.
According to Wikipedia, the "science" of eugenics was not invented by >>>>> the Nazis.
I didn't say that they had. (Nazi propoganda said the Nazis invented
everything.) I'm saying that this thread proves that making of puns was >>>> an evil the Nazis perpetrated on the world because of their association >>>> with eugenics.
They point out claims in Plutarch that said the Spartans wereThere were plenty of elites in science and medicine who considered that >>>> for the good of humanity the species could be improved through selective >>>> breeding and assination.
the first practitioners and that other Greeks *did* practice infanticide. >>>>
Apparently the modern founder of eugenics, and the man who coined the >>>>> term, was a Brit named Francis Galton, a half-cousin of Charles Darwin. >>>>
I have often wondered why it's both scientifically proven and common practice
in the agriculture and ranching world that selective breeding *does* improve >>>all manner of species-- from cattle to corn to race horses-- but for some >>>reason it's been decreed to not work with humans and we're never to speak >>>about it.
You've read the same novels I have.
You can't have forgotten that we lived through the Eugenics Wars three >decades ago.
On Jul 31, 2025 at 4:27:02 AM PDT, "NoBody" <[email protected]> wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jul 2025 05:36:21 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701 <[email protected]>
wrote:
On Jul 30, 2025 at 4:22:30 AM PDT, "NoBody" <[email protected]> wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jul 2025 18:10:22 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701 <[email protected]>
wrote:
So Sydney Sweeney made an ad for American Eagle where she fixes and drivesThe world has completely lost its mind.
cars in a pair of their blue genes while showing off the assets that she's
known for. The voiceover says, "Sydney Sweeney has great jeans":
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1950185359188336640/vid/avc1/720x1280/CQiTj3CTYsoK0yka.mp4?tag=21
Get it? The play on words where they conflate the comfort and look of the
jeans with the genes that gave her that cleavage, figure, and amazing ass.
Pretty clever ad and certainly eye-catching.
But to the leftist pundit-sphere and the frothing reactionaries on the >>>>> exTwitters and the Facebooks, this ad is nothing short of literal Nazi white
supremacy propaganda. You see, the ad wasn't referring to Sweeney's >>>>> cantaloupes when it said she has good jeans, they breathlessly inform us.
They were talking about how being white, blonde, and blue-eyed is
beautiful and
(of course) any kind of pride or praise for someone experiencing the >>>>> horrible
condition of whiteness is nazism! Nazism, I say!
Of course, if the women pictured below made a similar ad and extolled the
benefits of 'good genes', no one would say it's 'Nazi' and 'fascist'. >>>>>
https://ibb.co/MxHFVNrQ
Just another example of "It's only bad when white people do it".
If weren't for double standards, the Left would have no standards at all.
Sweeney should have just leaned into it with something like this:
https://ibb.co/S476XYbN
Then watched half the leftist intelligentsia seize up and stroke out.
Change the race and the New York Times would have advocated for
exactly this.
According to the Groks, 0.017% of the world�s population has blue eyes and >blonde hair. So that makes them an extreme minority. I thought the Left was >all about more minorities in advertising.
On 7/31/2025 1:26 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Jul 30, 2025 at 3:39:15 PM PDT, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <[email protected]> wrote:
Rhino <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2025-07-30 6:14 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
shawn <[email protected]> wrote:
Wed, 30 Jul 2025 14:23:41 -0500, super70s <[email protected]d>: >>>>>>> 2025-07-29 18:24:45 +0000, shawn said:
I can easily see that the people behind the commercial never considered
how their message would match up with the Nazi message or they would >>>>>>>> have changed it.
Even if you were born 60 years after Hitler's time like these ad >>>>>>> copywriters probably were you'd have to be pretty clueless not to >>>>>>> realize the possible repercussions of a "good jeans/genes" double >>>>>>> entendre.
Given that we have people who are suggesting the holocaust never
happened. They truly have convinced themselves it didn't happen. This >>>>>> seems especially prevalent amongst the youngest adults so I could see >>>>>> people who never made the connection between "good genes' and a
potential Nazi connection.
Until I read thread thread, I had made no connection whatsoever between >>>>> the use of puns and the fact that the Nazis invented eugenics.
According to Wikipedia, the "science" of eugenics was not invented by
the Nazis.
I didn't say that they had. (Nazi propoganda said the Nazis invented
everything.) I'm saying that this thread proves that making of puns was
an evil the Nazis perpetrated on the world because of their association
with eugenics.
They point out claims in Plutarch that said the Spartans wereThere were plenty of elites in science and medicine who considered that
the first practitioners and that other Greeks *did* practice infanticide. >>>
Apparently the modern founder of eugenics, and the man who coined the
term, was a Brit named Francis Galton, a half-cousin of Charles Darwin. >>>
for the good of humanity the species could be improved through selective >>> breeding and assination.
I have often wondered why it's both scientifically proven and common practice
in the agriculture and ranching world that selective breeding *does* improve >> all manner of species-- from cattle to corn to race horses-- but for some
reason it's been decreed to not work with humans and we're never to speak
about it.
It's because speaking about it leads to doing it, and we have a
religious conviction that that's wrong,
On 7/31/2025 4:34 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Jul 31, 2025 at 12:55:09 PM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On 7/31/2025 1:26 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
I have often wondered why it's both scientifically proven and common
practice in the agriculture and ranching world that selective breeding >>>> *does* improve all manner of species-- from cattle to corn to race
horses-- but for some reason it's been decreed to not work with humans >>>> and we're never to speak about it.
It's because speaking about it leads to doing it, and we have a
religious conviction that that's wrong,
What about those of us that aren't religious?
If you don't like 'religious', choose a better word for 'evidence-free
moral certainty'.
On Jul 31, 2025 at 4:21:15 AM PDT, "NoBody" <[email protected]> wrote:
super70s <[email protected]d> wrote:
On 2025-07-29 18:24:45 +0000, shawn said:
I can easily see that the people behind the commercial never considered >>>> how their message would match up with the Nazi message or they would
have changed it.
Even if you were born 60 years after Hitler's time like these ad
copywriters probably were you'd have to be pretty clueless not to
realize the possible repercussions of a "good jeans/genes" double
entendre.
Laughter!
Are you so clueless as to not know that "good genes" has been used as
a term for next to forever? It has zippo to do with Nazis.
I just saw a version of the ad that I hadn't seen up to this point. Sweeney >is hugging a dog while talking about her great jeans. The dog is a GERMAN >SHEPHERD!!! A blonde girl with milky-white skin, whose initials are SS and >petting German Shepherd?!?! How much more blatant can their call for the >return of the Reich be?!?!?
BTR1701 <[email protected]> wrote:
I just saw a version of the ad that I hadn’t seen up to this
point. Sweeney is hugging a dog while talking about her great jeans. The >>dog is a GERMAN SHEPHERD!!! A blonde girl with milky-white skin, whose >>initials are SS and petting German Shepherd?!?! How much more blatant
can their call for the return of the Reich be?!?!?
If a black woman has a pleasing figure, does she have good genes and is
she trying to resurrect Hitler?
On Thu, 31 Jul 2025 15:55:09 -0400, moviePig <[email protected]>
wrote:
On 7/31/2025 1:26 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Jul 30, 2025 at 3:39:15 PM PDT, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <[email protected]> wrote:
Rhino <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2025-07-30 6:14 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
shawn <[email protected]> wrote:
Wed, 30 Jul 2025 14:23:41 -0500, super70s <[email protected]d>: >>>>>>>> 2025-07-29 18:24:45 +0000, shawn said:
I can easily see that the people behind the commercial never considered
how their message would match up with the Nazi message or they would >>>>>>>>> have changed it.
Even if you were born 60 years after Hitler's time like these ad >>>>>>>> copywriters probably were you'd have to be pretty clueless not to >>>>>>>> realize the possible repercussions of a "good jeans/genes" double >>>>>>>> entendre.
Given that we have people who are suggesting the holocaust never >>>>>>> happened. They truly have convinced themselves it didn't happen. This >>>>>>> seems especially prevalent amongst the youngest adults so I could see >>>>>>> people who never made the connection between "good genes' and a
potential Nazi connection.
Until I read thread thread, I had made no connection whatsoever between >>>>>> the use of puns and the fact that the Nazis invented eugenics.
According to Wikipedia, the "science" of eugenics was not invented by >>>>> the Nazis.
I didn't say that they had. (Nazi propoganda said the Nazis invented
everything.) I'm saying that this thread proves that making of puns was >>>> an evil the Nazis perpetrated on the world because of their association >>>> with eugenics.
They point out claims in Plutarch that said the Spartans wereThere were plenty of elites in science and medicine who considered that >>>> for the good of humanity the species could be improved through selective >>>> breeding and assination.
the first practitioners and that other Greeks *did* practice infanticide. >>>>
Apparently the modern founder of eugenics, and the man who coined the >>>>> term, was a Brit named Francis Galton, a half-cousin of Charles Darwin. >>>>
I have often wondered why it's both scientifically proven and common practice
in the agriculture and ranching world that selective breeding *does* improve
all manner of species-- from cattle to corn to race horses-- but for some >>> reason it's been decreed to not work with humans and we're never to speak >>> about it.
It's because speaking about it leads to doing it, and we have a
religious conviction that that's wrong,
<eyeroll> Yeah a hot girl selling jeans is causing selective
breeding...
So Sydney Sweeney made an ad for American Eagle where she fixes and drives cars in a pair of their blue genes while showing off the assets that she's known for. The voiceover says, "Sydney Sweeney has great jeans":
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1950185359188336640/vid/avc1/720x1280/CQiTj3CTYsoK0yka.mp4?tag=21
Get it? The play on words where they conflate the comfort and look of the jeans with the genes that gave her that cleavage, figure, and amazing ass.
Pretty clever ad and certainly eye-catching.
But to the leftist pundit-sphere and the frothing reactionaries on the exTwitters and the Facebooks, this ad is nothing short of literal Nazi white supremacy propaganda. You see, the ad wasn't referring to Sweeney's cantaloupes when it said she has good jeans, they breathlessly inform us. They
were talking about how being white, blonde, and blue-eyed is beautiful and (of
course) any kind of pride or praise for someone experiencing the horrible condition of whiteness is nazism! Nazism, I say!
Of course, if the women pictured below made a similar ad and extolled the benefits of 'good genes', no one would say it's 'Nazi' and 'fascist'.
https://ibb.co/MxHFVNrQ
Just another example of "It's only bad when white people do it".
If weren't for double standards, the Left would have no standards at all.
On Jul 29, 2025 at 11:10:22 AM PDT, "BTR1701" <[email protected]> wrote:
So Sydney Sweeney made an ad for American Eagle where she fixes and drives >> cars in a pair of their blue genes while showing off the assets that she's >> known for. The voiceover says, "Sydney Sweeney has great jeans":
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1950185359188336640/vid/avc1/720x1280/CQiTj3CTYsoK0yka.mp4?tag=21
Get it? The play on words where they conflate the comfort and look of the
jeans with the genes that gave her that cleavage, figure, and amazing ass. >>
Pretty clever ad and certainly eye-catching.
But to the leftist pundit-sphere and the frothing reactionaries on the
exTwitters and the Facebooks, this ad is nothing short of literal Nazi white >> supremacy propaganda. You see, the ad wasn't referring to Sweeney's
cantaloupes when it said she has good jeans, they breathlessly inform us.
They
were talking about how being white, blonde, and blue-eyed is beautiful and >> (of
course) any kind of pride or praise for someone experiencing the horrible
condition of whiteness is nazism! Nazism, I say!
Of course, if the women pictured below made a similar ad and extolled the
benefits of 'good genes', no one would say it's 'Nazi' and 'fascist'.
https://ibb.co/MxHFVNrQ
Just another example of "It's only bad when white people do it".
If weren't for double standards, the Left would have no standards at all.
Comedians are getting in on the bandwagon. Here’s an Asian girl who does >stand-up, who used AI to put herself in a Sweeney ad.
https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1951005941106716672/pu/vid/avc1/1280x720/SA4U4aH0l0ILeMdr.mp4?tag=12
On Fri, 1 Aug 2025 19:34:05 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701 <[email protected]>
wrote:
On Jul 29, 2025 at 11:10:22 AM PDT, "BTR1701" <[email protected]> wrote:
So Sydney Sweeney made an ad for American Eagle where she fixes and drives >>> cars in a pair of their blue genes while showing off the assets that she's >>> known for. The voiceover says, "Sydney Sweeney has great jeans":Comedians are getting in on the bandwagon. Here’s an Asian girl who does >> stand-up, who used AI to put herself in a Sweeney ad.
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1950185359188336640/vid/avc1/720x1280/CQiTj3CTYsoK0yka.mp4?tag=21
Get it? The play on words where they conflate the comfort and look of the >>> jeans with the genes that gave her that cleavage, figure, and amazing ass. >>>
Pretty clever ad and certainly eye-catching.
But to the leftist pundit-sphere and the frothing reactionaries on the
exTwitters and the Facebooks, this ad is nothing short of literal Nazi white
supremacy propaganda. You see, the ad wasn't referring to Sweeney's
cantaloupes when it said she has good jeans, they breathlessly inform us. >>> They
were talking about how being white, blonde, and blue-eyed is beautiful and >>> (of
course) any kind of pride or praise for someone experiencing the horrible >>> condition of whiteness is nazism! Nazism, I say!
Of course, if the women pictured below made a similar ad and extolled the >>> benefits of 'good genes', no one would say it's 'Nazi' and 'fascist'.
https://ibb.co/MxHFVNrQ
Just another example of "It's only bad when white people do it".
If weren't for double standards, the Left would have no standards at all. >>
https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1951005941106716672/pu/vid/avc1/1280x720/SA4U4aH0l0ILeMdr.mp4?tag=12
https://www.instagram.com/p/DMtppRNO1W3/
On Jul 29, 2025 at 11:10:22 AM PDT, "BTR1701" <[email protected]> wrote:
So Sydney Sweeney made an ad for American Eagle where she fixes and drives >> cars in a pair of their blue genes while showing off the assets that she's >> known for. The voiceover says, "Sydney Sweeney has great jeans":
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1950185359188336640/vid/avc1/720x1280/CQiTj3CTYsoK0yka.mp4?tag=21
Get it? The play on words where they conflate the comfort and look of the
jeans with the genes that gave her that cleavage, figure, and amazing ass. >>
Pretty clever ad and certainly eye-catching.
But to the leftist pundit-sphere and the frothing reactionaries on the
exTwitters and the Facebooks, this ad is nothing short of literal Nazi white >> supremacy propaganda. You see, the ad wasn't referring to Sweeney's
cantaloupes when it said she has good jeans, they breathlessly inform us.
They
were talking about how being white, blonde, and blue-eyed is beautiful and >> (of
course) any kind of pride or praise for someone experiencing the horrible
condition of whiteness is nazism! Nazism, I say!
Of course, if the women pictured below made a similar ad and extolled the
benefits of 'good genes', no one would say it's 'Nazi' and 'fascist'.
https://ibb.co/MxHFVNrQ
Just another example of "It's only bad when white people do it".
If weren't for double standards, the Left would have no standards at all.
Comedians are getting in on the bandwagon. Here’s an Asian girl who does stand-up, who used AI to put herself in a Sweeney ad.
https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1951005941106716672/pu/vid/avc1/1280x720/SA4U4aH0l0ILeMdr.mp4?tag=12
That said there were always going to be people complaining about such
a campaign. If they hadn't had the Nazi angle perhaps they would have >complained because Sweeney isn't a plus sized model and so American
Eagle didn't want plus sized customers.
Back in the day, Hitler's Minister of Propaganda decided to put out some
Nazi postcards showing Aryan people and one of them was to feature a
handsome young blonde-haired blue-eyed young boy, a perfect Aryan. The >casting people looked around and came up with the perfect candidate who >epitomized exactly what they wanted. They took the pictures, distributed
the post cards and only later discovered that they boy they'd
photographed was Jewish....
On 2025-07-29 18:24:45 +0000, shawn said:
I can easily see that the people behind the commercial never considered
how their message would match up with the Nazi message or they would
have changed it.
Even if you were born 60 years after Hitler's time like these ad
copywriters probably were you'd have to be pretty clueless not to
realize the possible repercussions of a "good jeans/genes" double
entendre.
According to the Groks, 0.017% of the world�s population has blue eyes and >>blonde hair. So that makes them an extreme minority. I thought the Left was >>all about more minorities in advertising.
It has to be the "correct" minorities.
Given that we have people who are suggesting the holocaust never
happened. They truly have convinced themselves it didn't happen. This
seems especially prevalent amongst the youngest adults so I could see
people who never made the connection between "good genes' and a
potential Nazi connection.
On 8/1/2025 7:28 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jul 2025 15:55:09 -0400, moviePig <[email protected]>
wrote:
On 7/31/2025 1:26 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Jul 30, 2025 at 3:39:15 PM PDT, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <[email protected]> wrote:
Rhino <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2025-07-30 6:14 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
shawn <[email protected]> wrote:
Wed, 30 Jul 2025 14:23:41 -0500, super70s <[email protected]d>: >>>>>>>>> 2025-07-29 18:24:45 +0000, shawn said:
I can easily see that the people behind the commercial never considered
how their message would match up with the Nazi message or they would >>>>>>>>>> have changed it.
Even if you were born 60 years after Hitler's time like these ad >>>>>>>>> copywriters probably were you'd have to be pretty clueless not to >>>>>>>>> realize the possible repercussions of a "good jeans/genes" double >>>>>>>>> entendre.
Given that we have people who are suggesting the holocaust never >>>>>>>> happened. They truly have convinced themselves it didn't happen. This >>>>>>>> seems especially prevalent amongst the youngest adults so I could see >>>>>>>> people who never made the connection between "good genes' and a >>>>>>>> potential Nazi connection.
Until I read thread thread, I had made no connection whatsoever between >>>>>>> the use of puns and the fact that the Nazis invented eugenics.
According to Wikipedia, the "science" of eugenics was not invented by >>>>>> the Nazis.
I didn't say that they had. (Nazi propoganda said the Nazis invented >>>>> everything.) I'm saying that this thread proves that making of puns was >>>>> an evil the Nazis perpetrated on the world because of their association >>>>> with eugenics.
They point out claims in Plutarch that said the Spartans wereThere were plenty of elites in science and medicine who considered that >>>>> for the good of humanity the species could be improved through selective >>>>> breeding and assination.
the first practitioners and that other Greeks *did* practice infanticide.
Apparently the modern founder of eugenics, and the man who coined the >>>>>> term, was a Brit named Francis Galton, a half-cousin of Charles Darwin. >>>>>
I have often wondered why it's both scientifically proven and common practice
in the agriculture and ranching world that selective breeding *does* improve
all manner of species-- from cattle to corn to race horses-- but for some >>>> reason it's been decreed to not work with humans and we're never to speak >>>> about it.
It's because speaking about it leads to doing it, and we have a
religious conviction that that's wrong,
<eyeroll> Yeah a hot girl selling jeans is causing selective
breeding...
The question was why are we never to speak about it.
So Sydney Sweeney made an ad for American Eagle where she fixes and drives >cars in a pair of their blue genes while showing off the assets that she's >known for. The voiceover says, "Sydney Sweeney has great jeans":
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1950185359188336640/vid/avc1/720x1280/CQiTj3CTYsoK0yka.mp4?tag=21
Get it? The play on words where they conflate the comfort and look of the >jeans with the genes that gave her that cleavage, figure, and amazing ass.
Pretty clever ad and certainly eye-catching.
But to the leftist pundit-sphere and the frothing reactionaries on the >exTwitters and the Facebooks, this ad is nothing short of literal Nazi
white supremacy propaganda. You see, the ad wasn't referring to Sweeney's >cantaloupes when it said she has good jeans, they breathlessly inform
us. They were talking about how being white, blonde, and blue-eyed
is beautiful and (of course) any kind of pride or praise for someone >experiencing the horrible condition of whiteness is nazism! Nazism, I say!
Of course, if the women pictured below made a similar ad and extolled the >benefits of 'good genes', no one would say it's 'Nazi' and 'fascist'.
https://ibb.co/MxHFVNrQ
Just another example of "It's only bad when white people do it".
If weren't for double standards, the Left would have no standards at all.
On Fri, 1 Aug 2025 12:24:34 -0400, moviePig <[email protected]>
wrote:
On 8/1/2025 7:28 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jul 2025 15:55:09 -0400, moviePig <[email protected]>
wrote:
On 7/31/2025 1:26 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Jul 30, 2025 at 3:39:15 PM PDT, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <[email protected]> wrote:
Rhino <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2025-07-30 6:14 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
shawn <[email protected]> wrote:
Wed, 30 Jul 2025 14:23:41 -0500, super70s <[email protected]d>:
2025-07-29 18:24:45 +0000, shawn said:
I can easily see that the people behind the commercial never considered
how their message would match up with the Nazi message or they would
have changed it.
Even if you were born 60 years after Hitler's time like these ad >>>>>>>>>> copywriters probably were you'd have to be pretty clueless not to >>>>>>>>>> realize the possible repercussions of a "good jeans/genes" double >>>>>>>>>> entendre.
Given that we have people who are suggesting the holocaust never >>>>>>>>> happened. They truly have convinced themselves it didn't happen. This >>>>>>>>> seems especially prevalent amongst the youngest adults so I could see >>>>>>>>> people who never made the connection between "good genes' and a >>>>>>>>> potential Nazi connection.
Until I read thread thread, I had made no connection whatsoever between
the use of puns and the fact that the Nazis invented eugenics.
According to Wikipedia, the "science" of eugenics was not invented by >>>>>>> the Nazis.
I didn't say that they had. (Nazi propoganda said the Nazis invented >>>>>> everything.) I'm saying that this thread proves that making of puns was >>>>>> an evil the Nazis perpetrated on the world because of their association >>>>>> with eugenics.
They point out claims in Plutarch that said the Spartans wereThere were plenty of elites in science and medicine who considered that >>>>>> for the good of humanity the species could be improved through selective >>>>>> breeding and assination.
the first practitioners and that other Greeks *did* practice infanticide.
Apparently the modern founder of eugenics, and the man who coined the >>>>>>> term, was a Brit named Francis Galton, a half-cousin of Charles Darwin. >>>>>>
I have often wondered why it's both scientifically proven and common practice
in the agriculture and ranching world that selective breeding *does* improve
all manner of species-- from cattle to corn to race horses-- but for some >>>>> reason it's been decreed to not work with humans and we're never to speak >>>>> about it.
It's because speaking about it leads to doing it, and we have a
religious conviction that that's wrong,
<eyeroll> Yeah a hot girl selling jeans is causing selective
breeding...
The question was why are we never to speak about it.
Because it's stupid??
On 8/2/2025 9:25 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Fri, 1 Aug 2025 12:24:34 -0400, moviePig <[email protected]>
wrote:
On 8/1/2025 7:28 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jul 2025 15:55:09 -0400, moviePig <[email protected]>
wrote:
On 7/31/2025 1:26 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Jul 30, 2025 at 3:39:15 PM PDT, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <[email protected]> wrote:
Rhino <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2025-07-30 6:14 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
shawn <[email protected]> wrote:
Wed, 30 Jul 2025 14:23:41 -0500, super70s <[email protected]d>:
2025-07-29 18:24:45 +0000, shawn said:
I can easily see that the people behind the commercial never considered
how their message would match up with the Nazi message or they would
have changed it.
Even if you were born 60 years after Hitler's time like these ad >>>>>>>>>>> copywriters probably were you'd have to be pretty clueless not to >>>>>>>>>>> realize the possible repercussions of a "good jeans/genes" double >>>>>>>>>>> entendre.
Given that we have people who are suggesting the holocaust never >>>>>>>>>> happened. They truly have convinced themselves it didn't happen. This
seems especially prevalent amongst the youngest adults so I could see
people who never made the connection between "good genes' and a >>>>>>>>>> potential Nazi connection.
Until I read thread thread, I had made no connection whatsoever betweenAccording to Wikipedia, the "science" of eugenics was not invented by >>>>>>>> the Nazis.
the use of puns and the fact that the Nazis invented eugenics. >>>>>>>
I didn't say that they had. (Nazi propoganda said the Nazis invented >>>>>>> everything.) I'm saying that this thread proves that making of puns was >>>>>>> an evil the Nazis perpetrated on the world because of their association >>>>>>> with eugenics.
They point out claims in Plutarch that said the Spartans were
the first practitioners and that other Greeks *did* practice infanticide.
Apparently the modern founder of eugenics, and the man who coined the >>>>>>>> term, was a Brit named Francis Galton, a half-cousin of Charles Darwin.
There were plenty of elites in science and medicine who considered that >>>>>>> for the good of humanity the species could be improved through selective
breeding and assination.
I have often wondered why it's both scientifically proven and common practice
in the agriculture and ranching world that selective breeding *does* improve
all manner of species-- from cattle to corn to race horses-- but for some
reason it's been decreed to not work with humans and we're never to speak
about it.
It's because speaking about it leads to doing it, and we have a
religious conviction that that's wrong,
<eyeroll> Yeah a hot girl selling jeans is causing selective
breeding...
The question was why are we never to speak about it.
Because it's stupid??
'It' is 'selective breeding'.
BTR1701 <[email protected]> wrote:
So Sydney Sweeney made an ad for American Eagle where she fixes and drives >>cars in a pair of their blue genes while showing off the assets that she's >>known for. The voiceover says, "Sydney Sweeney has great jeans":
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1950185359188336640/vid/avc1/720x1280/CQiTj3CTYsoK0yka.mp4?tag=21
Get it? The play on words where they conflate the comfort and look of the >>jeans with the genes that gave her that cleavage, figure, and amazing ass.
Pretty clever ad and certainly eye-catching.
But to the leftist pundit-sphere and the frothing reactionaries on the >>exTwitters and the Facebooks, this ad is nothing short of literal Nazi >>white supremacy propaganda. You see, the ad wasn't referring to Sweeney's >>cantaloupes when it said she has good jeans, they breathlessly inform
us. They were talking about how being white, blonde, and blue-eyed
is beautiful and (of course) any kind of pride or praise for someone >>experiencing the horrible condition of whiteness is nazism! Nazism, I say!
Of course, if the women pictured below made a similar ad and extolled the >>benefits of 'good genes', no one would say it's 'Nazi' and 'fascist'.
https://ibb.co/MxHFVNrQ
Just another example of "It's only bad when white people do it".
If weren't for double standards, the Left would have no standards at all.
I tracked down an erotic scene from The Voyeurs (2021). Sydney Sweeney
isn't wearing jeans. She and Ben Hardy aren't having much of a discussion
at all in it. But yes, it's absolutely clear that eugenics is being
implied.
On Sat, 2 Aug 2025 12:54:21 -0400, moviePig <[email protected]>
wrote:
On 8/2/2025 9:25 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Fri, 1 Aug 2025 12:24:34 -0400, moviePig <[email protected]>
wrote:
On 8/1/2025 7:28 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jul 2025 15:55:09 -0400, moviePig <[email protected]>
wrote:
On 7/31/2025 1:26 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Jul 30, 2025 at 3:39:15 PM PDT, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <[email protected]> wrote:
Rhino <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2025-07-30 6:14 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
shawn <[email protected]> wrote:
Wed, 30 Jul 2025 14:23:41 -0500, super70s <[email protected]d>:
2025-07-29 18:24:45 +0000, shawn said:
I can easily see that the people behind the commercial never considered
how their message would match up with the Nazi message or they would
have changed it.
Even if you were born 60 years after Hitler's time like these ad >>>>>>>>>>>> copywriters probably were you'd have to be pretty clueless not to >>>>>>>>>>>> realize the possible repercussions of a "good jeans/genes" double >>>>>>>>>>>> entendre.
Given that we have people who are suggesting the holocaust never >>>>>>>>>>> happened. They truly have convinced themselves it didn't happen. This
seems especially prevalent amongst the youngest adults so I could see
people who never made the connection between "good genes' and a >>>>>>>>>>> potential Nazi connection.
Until I read thread thread, I had made no connection whatsoever betweenAccording to Wikipedia, the "science" of eugenics was not invented by >>>>>>>>> the Nazis.
the use of puns and the fact that the Nazis invented eugenics. >>>>>>>>
I didn't say that they had. (Nazi propoganda said the Nazis invented >>>>>>>> everything.) I'm saying that this thread proves that making of puns was
an evil the Nazis perpetrated on the world because of their association
with eugenics.
They point out claims in Plutarch that said the Spartans were >>>>>>>>> the first practitioners and that other Greeks *did* practice infanticide.
Apparently the modern founder of eugenics, and the man who coined the >>>>>>>>> term, was a Brit named Francis Galton, a half-cousin of Charles Darwin.
There were plenty of elites in science and medicine who considered that
for the good of humanity the species could be improved through selective
breeding and assination.
I have often wondered why it's both scientifically proven and common practice
in the agriculture and ranching world that selective breeding *does* improve
all manner of species-- from cattle to corn to race horses-- but for some
reason it's been decreed to not work with humans and we're never to speak
about it.
It's because speaking about it leads to doing it, and we have a
religious conviction that that's wrong,
<eyeroll> Yeah a hot girl selling jeans is causing selective
breeding...
The question was why are we never to speak about it.
Because it's stupid??
'It' is 'selective breeding'.
Noting that one has good genes is not advocating selective breeding. I
heard people say that years ago when I was a kid.
Damn you folks are always just waiting for something to be outraged
about.
I tracked down an erotic scene from The Voyeurs (2021). Sydney Sweeney >>isn't wearing jeans. She and Ben Hardy aren't having much of a discussion >>at all in it. But yes, it's absolutely clear that eugenics is being >>implied.
Laughter!
Any reference to having good genes is eugenics???
On Sat, 2 Aug 2025 15:30:41 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman"
<[email protected]> wrote:
BTR1701 <[email protected]> wrote:
So Sydney Sweeney made an ad for American Eagle where she fixes and drives >>> cars in a pair of their blue genes while showing off the assets that she's >>> known for. The voiceover says, "Sydney Sweeney has great jeans":I tracked down an erotic scene from The Voyeurs (2021). Sydney Sweeney
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1950185359188336640/vid/avc1/720x1280/CQiTj3CTYsoK0yka.mp4?tag=21
Get it? The play on words where they conflate the comfort and look of the >>> jeans with the genes that gave her that cleavage, figure, and amazing ass. >>
Pretty clever ad and certainly eye-catching.
But to the leftist pundit-sphere and the frothing reactionaries on the
exTwitters and the Facebooks, this ad is nothing short of literal Nazi
white supremacy propaganda. You see, the ad wasn't referring to Sweeney's >>> cantaloupes when it said she has good jeans, they breathlessly inform
us. They were talking about how being white, blonde, and blue-eyed
is beautiful and (of course) any kind of pride or praise for someone
experiencing the horrible condition of whiteness is nazism! Nazism, I say! >>
Of course, if the women pictured below made a similar ad and extolled the >>> benefits of 'good genes', no one would say it's 'Nazi' and 'fascist'.
https://ibb.co/MxHFVNrQ
Just another example of "It's only bad when white people do it".
If weren't for double standards, the Left would have no standards at all. >>
isn't wearing jeans. She and Ben Hardy aren't having much of a discussion
at all in it. But yes, it's absolutely clear that eugenics is being
implied.
Laughter!
Any reference to having good genes is eugenics???
On 8/3/2025 9:24 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Sat, 2 Aug 2025 15:30:41 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman"
<[email protected]> wrote:
BTR1701 <[email protected]> wrote:
So Sydney Sweeney made an ad for American Eagle where she fixes and drives >>>> cars in a pair of their blue genes while showing off the assets that she's >>>> known for. The voiceover says, "Sydney Sweeney has great jeans":I tracked down an erotic scene from The Voyeurs (2021). Sydney Sweeney
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1950185359188336640/vid/avc1/720x1280/CQiTj3CTYsoK0yka.mp4?tag=21
Get it? The play on words where they conflate the comfort and look of the >>>> jeans with the genes that gave her that cleavage, figure, and amazing ass. >>>
Pretty clever ad and certainly eye-catching.
But to the leftist pundit-sphere and the frothing reactionaries on the >>>> exTwitters and the Facebooks, this ad is nothing short of literal Nazi >>>> white supremacy propaganda. You see, the ad wasn't referring to Sweeney's >>>> cantaloupes when it said she has good jeans, they breathlessly inform
us. They were talking about how being white, blonde, and blue-eyed
is beautiful and (of course) any kind of pride or praise for someone
experiencing the horrible condition of whiteness is nazism! Nazism, I say! >>>
Of course, if the women pictured below made a similar ad and extolled the >>>> benefits of 'good genes', no one would say it's 'Nazi' and 'fascist'.
https://ibb.co/MxHFVNrQ
Just another example of "It's only bad when white people do it".
If weren't for double standards, the Left would have no standards at all. >>>
isn't wearing jeans. She and Ben Hardy aren't having much of a discussion >>> at all in it. But yes, it's absolutely clear that eugenics is being
implied.
Laughter!
Any reference to having good genes is eugenics???
Yes, afaik. Etymologically.
On 8/3/2025 9:24 AM, NoBody wrote:
"Adam H. Kerman" <[email protected]> wrote:
BTR1701 <[email protected]> wrote:
So Sydney Sweeney made an ad for American Eagle where she fixes andI tracked down an erotic scene from The Voyeurs (2021). Sydney Sweeney
drives cars in a pair of their blue genes while showing off the assets >>>> that she's known for. The voiceover says, "Sydney Sweeney has great
jeans":
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1950185359188336640/vid/avc1/720x1280/CQiTj3CTYsoK0yka.mp4
Get it? The play on words where they conflate the comfort and look of the >>>> jeans with the genes that gave her that cleavage, figure, and amazing ass. >>>>
Pretty clever ad and certainly eye-catching.
But to the leftist pundit-sphere and the frothing reactionaries on the >>>> exTwitters and the Facebooks, this ad is nothing short of literal Nazi >>>> white supremacy propaganda. You see, the ad wasn't referring to Sweeney's >>>> cantaloupes when it said she has good jeans, they breathlessly inform
us. They were talking about how being white, blonde, and blue-eyed
is beautiful and (of course) any kind of pride or praise for someone
experiencing the horrible condition of whiteness is nazism! Nazism, I say! >>>>
Of course, if the women pictured below made a similar ad and extolled the >>>> benefits of 'good genes', no one would say it's 'Nazi' and 'fascist'.
https://ibb.co/MxHFVNrQ
Just another example of "It's only bad when white people do it".
If weren't for double standards, the Left would have no standards at all. >>>
isn't wearing jeans. She and Ben Hardy aren't having much of a discussion >>> at all in it. But yes, it's absolutely clear that eugenics is being
implied.
Laughter!
Any reference to having good genes is eugenics???
Yes, afaik. Etymologically.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 715 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 23:56:44 |
| Calls: | 12,105 |
| Calls today: | 5 |
| Files: | 15,006 |
| Messages: | 6,518,155 |