On one of my newer systems I was suddenly having trouble getting >eternal-september to refresh the messages the past couple of days.
So I went to eternal-september.org and checked the settings. Turns out >they're different from the settings I had for
reader-eternal-september.org and news.eternal-september.org -- they
have been changed.
The correct server for reader.eternal-september.org is now >reader80.eternal-september.org, port 80, no SSL.
The correct server for news.eternal-september.org is still >news.eternal-september.org, but port 110, no SSL.
At least that's what works for me now. Maybe you should check your ES >settings in case you run into trouble like I did.
Strangely, on my older system and newsreader (MT NewsWatcher) both of
those servers work normally, without making any of the above changes.
Which are reader.eternal-september.org, port 119
and news.eternal-september.org, port 119.
Go figure.
super70s <[email protected]d> wrote:
On one of my newer systems I was suddenly having trouble getting >>eternal-september to refresh the messages the past couple of days.
So I went to eternal-september.org and checked the settings. Turns out >>they're different from the settings I had for
reader-eternal-september.org and news.eternal-september.org -- they
have been changed.
The correct server for reader.eternal-september.org is now >>reader80.eternal-september.org, port 80, no SSL.
The name of the host has been reader80 for years.
There's also
reader443.eternal-september.org, port 443 for NNTPS using a modern TLS,
not SSL.
The correct server for news.eternal-september.org is still >>news.eternal-september.org, but port 110, no SSL.
This is wrong. It's port 119.
For NNTPS using a modern TLS, use port 563.
At least that's what works for me now. Maybe you should check your ES >>settings in case you run into trouble like I did.
Strangely, on my older system and newsreader (MT NewsWatcher) both of
those servers work normally, without making any of the above changes.
Which are reader.eternal-september.org, port 119
This doesn't make any sense unless it's somehow saved a redirect to
reader80. Why not change it to the correct host?
and news.eternal-september.org, port 119.
Go figure.
super70s <[email protected]d> wrote:
On one of my newer systems I was suddenly having trouble getting
eternal-september to refresh the messages the past couple of days.
So I went to eternal-september.org and checked the settings. Turns out
they're different from the settings I had for
reader-eternal-september.org and news.eternal-september.org -- they
have been changed.
The correct server for reader.eternal-september.org is now
reader80.eternal-september.org, port 80, no SSL.
The name of the host has been reader80 for years.
There's also
reader443.eternal-september.org, port 443 for NNTPS using a modern TLS,
not SSL.
The correct server for news.eternal-september.org is still
news.eternal-september.org, but port 110, no SSL.
This is wrong. It's port 119.
At least that's what works for me now. Maybe you should check your ES
settings in case you run into trouble like I did.
Strangely, on my older system and newsreader (MT NewsWatcher) both of
those servers work normally, without making any of the above changes.
Which are reader.eternal-september.org, port 119
This doesn't make any sense unless it's somehow saved a redirect to
reader80. Why not change it to the correct host?
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 715 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 40:06:50 |
| Calls: | 12,109 |
| Files: | 15,006 |
| Messages: | 6,518,395 |