• [OT] 12 year old British born girl punished for celebrating British cul

    From Rhino@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jul 16 18:33:02 2025
    Her entire school had a Cultural Diversity Day and all students were
    told to wear something celebrating her own culture instead of the usual
    school uniforms so she wore a dress that was essentially a British flag.
    She was an A student but found herself punished for her choice of
    clothing - along with other students - and her parents were called to
    pick her up early.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PE2jV5qxE4g [8 minutes]

    Her parents were not at all happy and her community was very agitated as
    well. The school gave an after-the-fact "apology" where they promised to reconsider how the event was run the next year. I'll believe that when I
    see it!

    --
    Rhino

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Adam H. Kerman@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jul 16 23:56:31 2025
    Rhino <[email protected]> wrote:

    Rhino, can I please point out that you are discussing a video and
    therefore this is on topic discussion? There's no reason to tag this off
    topic.

    Her entire school had a Cultural Diversity Day and all students were
    told to wear something celebrating her own culture instead of the usual >school uniforms so she wore a dress that was essentially a British flag.
    She was an A student but found herself punished for her choice of
    clothing - along with other students - and her parents were called to
    pick her up early.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PE2jV5qxE4g [8 minutes]

    She's such a sweet child. How can any teacher wish to punish her?

    This is such a sad story. The girl actually liked school and was
    thriving. I hope she learned her lesson but I have no idea what it might
    be.

    Her parents were not at all happy and her community was very agitated as >well. The school gave an after-the-fact "apology" where they promised to >reconsider how the event was run the next year. I'll believe that when I
    see it!

    A lawsuit needs to be filed against the school administration banning
    them from every being within 50 feet of a child.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rhino@21:1/5 to Adam H. Kerman on Wed Jul 16 20:24:11 2025
    On 2025-07-16 7:56 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
    Rhino <[email protected]> wrote:

    Rhino, can I please point out that you are discussing a video and
    therefore this is on topic discussion? There's no reason to tag this off topic.

    I've always assumed that YouTube videos don't count as TV and have
    always marked them as off-topic. No one has ever challenged that
    understanding until now and it's been years....

    Her entire school had a Cultural Diversity Day and all students were
    told to wear something celebrating her own culture instead of the usual
    school uniforms so she wore a dress that was essentially a British flag.
    She was an A student but found herself punished for her choice of
    clothing - along with other students - and her parents were called to
    pick her up early.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PE2jV5qxE4g [8 minutes]

    She's such a sweet child. How can any teacher wish to punish her?

    This is such a sad story. The girl actually liked school and was
    thriving. I hope she learned her lesson but I have no idea what it might
    be.

    That the school systems in Western countries has been infiltrated by wrong-headed political activists acting to utterly destroy the existing
    culture in favour of some form of neo-Marxism?

    Her parents were not at all happy and her community was very agitated as
    well. The school gave an after-the-fact "apology" where they promised to
    reconsider how the event was run the next year. I'll believe that when I
    see it!

    A lawsuit needs to be filed against the school administration banning
    them from every being within 50 feet of a child.

    A lot of the commenters would agree with you. They seem to be equally
    torn between suing the school and firing the headmistress and/or
    teachers. I'd be happy with either or both.

    --
    Rhino

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From anim8rfsk@21:1/5 to Rhino on Wed Jul 16 19:02:00 2025
    Rhino <[email protected]> wrote:
    Her entire school had a Cultural Diversity Day and all students were
    told to wear something celebrating her own culture instead of the usual school uniforms so she wore a dress that was essentially a British flag.
    She was an A student but found herself punished for her choice of
    clothing - along with other students - and her parents were called to
    pick her up early.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PE2jV5qxE4g [8 minutes]

    Her parents were not at all happy and her community was very agitated as well. The school gave an after-the-fact "apology" where they promised to reconsider how the event was run the next year. I'll believe that when I
    see it!


    I’ve seen that and it wasn’t clear to me if maybe she got punished under a flag rule. When I was her age, it was illegal to wear clothing made from
    the American flag.

    --
    The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rhino@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jul 16 22:48:38 2025
    On 2025-07-16 10:02 PM, anim8rfsk wrote:
    Rhino <[email protected]> wrote:
    Her entire school had a Cultural Diversity Day and all students were
    told to wear something celebrating her own culture instead of the usual
    school uniforms so she wore a dress that was essentially a British flag.
    She was an A student but found herself punished for her choice of
    clothing - along with other students - and her parents were called to
    pick her up early.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PE2jV5qxE4g [8 minutes]

    Her parents were not at all happy and her community was very agitated as
    well. The school gave an after-the-fact "apology" where they promised to
    reconsider how the event was run the next year. I'll believe that when I
    see it!


    I’ve seen that and it wasn’t clear to me if maybe she got punished under a
    flag rule. When I was her age, it was illegal to wear clothing made from
    the American flag.

    There's no information in the video that suggests that it is illegal to
    wear clothing containing the British flag. If it is, there are millions
    of T-shirts that are in violation of that law. I've seen plenty of
    T-shirts celebrating one British band or another over the years that
    featured a British flag worn proudly by fans of the band in question.

    Here is a Google images search of T-shirts with the British flag on them:

    https://www.google.ca/search?q=t-shirts+containing+flag+of+britain&udm=2

    There's a Beatles one near the top and a Def Leppard one somewhat
    farther down. I'm pretty sure the shirt that said "The Who - Maximum
    R&B" also contains a British flag but I haven't scrolled far enough to
    see that. (Of course most of these shirts are not about bands but are
    just general tourist souvenir - and proud Brit - clothing.)

    Of course, wearing clothing that featured the *English* flag is a whole different kettle of fish! The flag that we see all the time representing
    the UK is an amalgamation of the flags of England, Scotland and Wales
    when they were separate countries (that sometimes went to war with one
    another) but when they settled all those disputes (more or less) and
    merged into the same country, the flag was a merger of the flags of
    England, Scotland and Wales. Flying the old flag of England - the St.
    George flag - is "problematic" in the UK these days. "Progressives" see
    it as representing a coarse nationalism steeped in racism.

    I don't know if it is actually illegal to fly the English flag but I
    would expect AT LEAST to be soundly scorned by neighbours and passersby
    if you do.

    Hmm, just out of curiousity, I did another image search for T-shirts
    with the *English* flag and got this:

    https://www.google.ca/search?q=t-shirts+containing+flag+of+england&udm=2

    A *lot* of those pictures are actually showing the UK flag, not the
    English flag, but there are some of the English flag too so it is
    presumably not illegal to have a shirt with that flag either. Here is
    just one:

    https://www.ebay.ca/itm/125623805527

    I gather it is still a provocative flag to fly (and presumably wear)
    though.

    Here is a VERY short video about that, just over a minute long:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gLLZ3kkKHqU

    --
    Rhino

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From moviePig@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jul 16 22:39:40 2025
    On 7/16/2025 10:02 PM, anim8rfsk wrote:
    Rhino <[email protected]> wrote:
    Her entire school had a Cultural Diversity Day and all students were
    told to wear something celebrating her own culture instead of the usual
    school uniforms so she wore a dress that was essentially a British flag.
    She was an A student but found herself punished for her choice of
    clothing - along with other students - and her parents were called to
    pick her up early.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PE2jV5qxE4g [8 minutes]

    Her parents were not at all happy and her community was very agitated as
    well. The school gave an after-the-fact "apology" where they promised to
    reconsider how the event was run the next year. I'll believe that when I
    see it!


    I’ve seen that and it wasn’t clear to me if maybe she got punished under a
    flag rule. When I was her age, it was illegal to wear clothing made from
    the American flag.

    In today's (and yesterday's, and the day before's...) political climate,
    it's also possible that she was brandishing an anti-diversity sentiment.
    Even if she wasn't, I'd guess someone assumed she was.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Your Name@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jul 17 15:36:59 2025
    On 2025-07-17 02:02:00 +0000, anim8rfsk said:
    Rhino <[email protected]> wrote:
    Her entire school had a Cultural Diversity Day and all students were
    told to wear something celebrating her own culture instead of the usual
    school uniforms so she wore a dress that was essentially a British flag.
    She was an A student but found herself punished for her choice of
    clothing - along with other students - and her parents were called to
    pick her up early.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PE2jV5qxE4g [8 minutes]

    Her parents were not at all happy and her community was very agitated as
    well. The school gave an after-the-fact "apology" where they promised to
    reconsider how the event was run the next year. I'll believe that when I
    see it!

    I’ve seen that and it wasn’t clear to me if maybe she got punished under a
    flag rule. When I was her age, it was illegal to wear clothing made from
    the American flag.

    No such rule in the UK. The Spice Girls' Ginger Spice has famously worn
    a Union Jack dress (two or three different ones) on a few occasions.
    Even Union Jack underwear is easily buyable in UK shops.

    Reportedly the school also sent home other pupils who had St George's
    and Welsh flags. Apparently it is not Politically Correct to display
    your country's flag because it might upset some idiot.

    BUT the school in the news story above has now been forced to apologise
    to the girl and her family (and presumably the other students) and is "reviewing their policies and strentghening staff training". <https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/school-apologises-after-girl-12-punished-for-wearing-union-jack-dress-to-culture-day/ar-AA1IEv8L>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BTR1701@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jul 17 05:13:51 2025
    On Jul 16, 2025 at 3:33:02 PM PDT, "Rhino" <[email protected]> wrote:

    Her entire school had a Cultural Diversity Day and all students were
    told to wear something celebrating her own culture instead of the usual school uniforms so she wore a dress that was essentially a British flag.
    She was an A student but found herself punished for her choice of
    clothing - along with other students - and her parents were called to
    pick her up early.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PE2jV5qxE4g [8 minutes]

    Her parents were not at all happy and her community was very agitated as well. The school gave an after-the-fact "apology" where they promised to reconsider how the event was run the next year. I'll believe that when I
    see it!

    Oh, I'm sure they are truly reconsidering how the event will be run in the future. This time around, the flyer with the instructions for the event said
    to come dressed in a manner expressing your nationality or family heritage,
    and didn't exclude white native-born British nationality and heritage.

    After reconsideration, I'm sure they'll conclude that where they went wrong
    was not making it clear from the start that the event doesn't include white people and/or British history or culture. Next year's flyer will be sure to make that explicit, with instructions to the white kids to just wear their normal school uniforms while everyone else dresses up.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BTR1701@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jul 17 05:25:09 2025
    On Jul 16, 2025 at 7:48:38 PM PDT, "Rhino" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 2025-07-16 10:02 PM, anim8rfsk wrote:
    Rhino <[email protected]> wrote:

    Her entire school had a Cultural Diversity Day and all students were
    told to wear something celebrating her own culture instead of the usual >>> school uniforms so she wore a dress that was essentially a British flag. >>> She was an A student but found herself punished for her choice of
    clothing - along with other students - and her parents were called to
    pick her up early.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PE2jV5qxE4g [8 minutes]

    Her parents were not at all happy and her community was very agitated as >>> well. The school gave an after-the-fact "apology" where they promised to >>> reconsider how the event was run the next year. I'll believe that when I >>> see it!

    I’ve seen that and it wasn’t clear to me if maybe she got punished under a
    flag rule. When I was her age, it was illegal to wear clothing made from
    the American flag.

    There's no information in the video that suggests that it is illegal to
    wear clothing containing the British flag. If it is, there are millions
    of T-shirts that are in violation of that law. I've seen plenty of
    T-shirts celebrating one British band or another over the years that
    featured a British flag worn proudly by fans of the band in question.

    Speaking of bands and politics, I just saw this today:

    https://ibb.co/j9VVvXpn

    The Steve Miller Band has canceled all dates for its 2025 North American tour due to the general trend of climate change-induced weather disasters:

    "The combination of extreme heat, unpredictable flooding, tornadoes, hurricanes, and massive forest fires make these risks for you, our audience, the band, and the crew unacceptable."

    So basically the band has effectively played their last concert and retired because there's never going to be day in the future where storms and wildfires don't exist, even if 'climate change' was somehow solved.'

    But it's not a cult...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BTR1701@21:1/5 to moviePig on Thu Jul 17 05:18:46 2025
    On Jul 16, 2025 at 7:39:40 PM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 7/16/2025 10:02 PM, anim8rfsk wrote:
    Rhino <[email protected]> wrote:

    Her entire school had a Cultural Diversity Day and all students were
    told to wear something celebrating her own culture instead of the usual >>> school uniforms so she wore a dress that was essentially a British flag. >>> She was an A student but found herself punished for her choice of
    clothing - along with other students - and her parents were called to
    pick her up early.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PE2jV5qxE4g [8 minutes]

    Her parents were not at all happy and her community was very agitated as >>> well. The school gave an after-the-fact "apology" where they promised to >>> reconsider how the event was run the next year. I'll believe that when I >>> see it!


    I’ve seen that and it wasn’t clear to me if maybe she got punished under a
    flag rule. When I was her age, it was illegal to wear clothing made from
    the American flag.

    In today's (and yesterday's, and the day before's...) political climate,
    it's also possible that she was brandishing an anti-diversity sentiment.

    Which in a country with a 1st Amendment and a robust protection of free speech can and should never be grounds for discipline. People, even school children, are allowed to have an opinion on issues of public concern that are contrary
    to those of the strutting martinets who run the school.

    (Yes, I know this was England and they don't have a 1st Amendment, though they do claim to value free speech in theory, even if less and less in practice as time goes on.)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From anim8rfsk@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Thu Jul 17 04:21:52 2025
    BTR1701 <[email protected]> wrote:
    On Jul 16, 2025 at 7:48:38 PM PDT, "Rhino" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 2025-07-16 10:02 PM, anim8rfsk wrote:
    Rhino <[email protected]> wrote:

    Her entire school had a Cultural Diversity Day and all students were
    told to wear something celebrating her own culture instead of the usual >>>> school uniforms so she wore a dress that was essentially a British flag. >>>> She was an A student but found herself punished for her choice of
    clothing - along with other students - and her parents were called to
    pick her up early.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PE2jV5qxE4g [8 minutes]

    Her parents were not at all happy and her community was very agitated as >>>> well. The school gave an after-the-fact "apology" where they promised to >>>> reconsider how the event was run the next year. I'll believe that when I >>>> see it!

    I’ve seen that and it wasn’t clear to me if maybe she got punished under a
    flag rule. When I was her age, it was illegal to wear clothing made from >>> the American flag.

    There's no information in the video that suggests that it is illegal to
    wear clothing containing the British flag. If it is, there are millions
    of T-shirts that are in violation of that law. I've seen plenty of
    T-shirts celebrating one British band or another over the years that
    featured a British flag worn proudly by fans of the band in question.

    Speaking of bands and politics, I just saw this today:

    https://ibb.co/j9VVvXpn

    The Steve Miller Band has canceled all dates for its 2025 North American tour due to the general trend of climate change-induced weather disasters:

    "The combination of extreme heat, unpredictable flooding, tornadoes, hurricanes, and massive forest fires make these risks for you, our audience, the band, and the crew unacceptable."

    So basically the band has effectively played their last concert and retired because there's never going to be day in the future where storms and wildfires
    don't exist, even if 'climate change' was somehow solved.'

    But it's not a cult...

    Time keeps on slippin', slippin', slippin'
    Into the future
    Time keeps on slippin', slippin', slippin'
    Into the future
    Time keeps on slippin', slippin', slippin'
    Into the future
    Time keeps on slippin', slippin', slippin'
    Into the future



    --
    The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From moviePig@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jul 17 11:14:18 2025
    On 7/17/2025 1:18 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 16, 2025 at 7:39:40 PM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 7/16/2025 10:02 PM, anim8rfsk wrote:
    Rhino <[email protected]> wrote:

    Her entire school had a Cultural Diversity Day and all students were >>>> told to wear something celebrating her own culture instead of the usual >>>> school uniforms so she wore a dress that was essentially a British flag. >>>> She was an A student but found herself punished for her choice of
    clothing - along with other students - and her parents were called to >>>> pick her up early.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PE2jV5qxE4g [8 minutes]

    Her parents were not at all happy and her community was very agitated as >>>> well. The school gave an after-the-fact "apology" where they promised to >>>> reconsider how the event was run the next year. I'll believe that when I >>>> see it!


    I’ve seen that and it wasn’t clear to me if maybe she got punished under a
    flag rule. When I was her age, it was illegal to wear clothing made from >>> the American flag.

    In today's (and yesterday's, and the day before's...) political climate,
    it's also possible that she was brandishing an anti-diversity sentiment.

    Which in a country with a 1st Amendment and a robust protection of free speech
    can and should never be grounds for discipline. People, even school children, are allowed to have an opinion on issues of public concern that are contrary to those of the strutting martinets who run the school.

    (Yes, I know this was England and they don't have a 1st Amendment, though they
    do claim to value free speech in theory, even if less and less in practice as time goes on.)

    Yes, but I continue to hope for a difference between speech to inform
    and speech to injure.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rhino@21:1/5 to moviePig on Thu Jul 17 12:00:16 2025
    On 2025-07-16 10:39 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 7/16/2025 10:02 PM, anim8rfsk wrote:
    Rhino <[email protected]> wrote:
    Her entire school had a Cultural Diversity Day and all students were
    told to wear something celebrating her own culture instead of the usual
    school uniforms so she wore a dress that was essentially a British flag. >>> She was an A student but found herself punished for her choice of
    clothing - along with other students - and her parents were called to
    pick her up early.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PE2jV5qxE4g [8 minutes]

    Her parents were not at all happy and her community was very agitated as >>> well. The school gave an after-the-fact "apology" where they promised to >>> reconsider how the event was run the next year. I'll believe that when I >>> see it!


    I’ve seen that and it wasn’t clear to me if maybe she got punished
    under a
    flag rule. When I was her age, it was illegal to wear clothing made from
    the American flag.

    In today's (and yesterday's, and the day before's...) political climate,
    it's also possible that she was brandishing an anti-diversity sentiment.
     Even if she wasn't, I'd guess someone assumed she was.


    Did you actually watch the fucking video? They show what she wore and it shouldn't have been "problematic" to anyone unless they had a hate on
    for the UK. Leo also read the speech which she had planned to give which totally embraced diversity and all the other cultures represented at the school. Anyone who found some kind of racism in either is completely
    demented.

    --
    Rhino

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rhino@21:1/5 to Your Name on Thu Jul 17 12:04:02 2025
    On 2025-07-16 11:36 PM, Your Name wrote:
    On 2025-07-17 02:02:00 +0000, anim8rfsk said:
    Rhino <[email protected]> wrote:
    Her entire school had a Cultural Diversity Day and all students were
    told to wear something celebrating her own culture instead of the usual
    school uniforms so she wore a dress that was essentially a British flag. >>> She was an A student but found herself punished for her choice of
    clothing - along with other students - and her parents were called to
    pick her up early.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PE2jV5qxE4g [8 minutes]

    Her parents were not at all happy and her community was very agitated as >>> well. The school gave an after-the-fact "apology" where they promised to >>> reconsider how the event was run the next year. I'll believe that when I >>> see it!

    I’ve seen that and it wasn’t clear to me if maybe she got punished
    under a
    flag rule. When I was her age, it was illegal to wear clothing made from
    the American flag.

    No such rule in the UK. The Spice Girls' Ginger Spice has famously worn
    a Union Jack dress (two or three different ones) on a few occasions.
    Even Union Jack underwear is easily buyable in UK shops.

    Reportedly the school also sent home other pupils who had St George's
    and Welsh flags. Apparently it is not Politically Correct to display
    your country's flag because it might upset some idiot.

    BUT the school in the news story above has now been forced to apologise
    to the girl and her family (and presumably the other students) and is "reviewing their policies and strentghening staff training". <https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/school-apologises-after-girl-12- punished-for-wearing-union-jack-dress-to-culture-day/ar-AA1IEv8L>


    This "review" does NOT mean they'll do things differently the next time
    they have this event: they could easily decide that they did exactly the
    right thing this time and do it exactly the same way the next time.


    --
    Rhino

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rhino@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jul 17 12:08:45 2025
    On 2025-07-17 1:25 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 16, 2025 at 7:48:38 PM PDT, "Rhino" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 2025-07-16 10:02 PM, anim8rfsk wrote:
    Rhino <[email protected]> wrote:

    Her entire school had a Cultural Diversity Day and all students were >>>> told to wear something celebrating her own culture instead of the usual >>>> school uniforms so she wore a dress that was essentially a British flag. >>>> She was an A student but found herself punished for her choice of
    clothing - along with other students - and her parents were called to >>>> pick her up early.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PE2jV5qxE4g [8 minutes]

    Her parents were not at all happy and her community was very agitated as >>>> well. The school gave an after-the-fact "apology" where they promised to >>>> reconsider how the event was run the next year. I'll believe that when I >>>> see it!

    I’ve seen that and it wasn’t clear to me if maybe she got punished under a
    flag rule. When I was her age, it was illegal to wear clothing made from >>> the American flag.

    There's no information in the video that suggests that it is illegal to
    wear clothing containing the British flag. If it is, there are millions
    of T-shirts that are in violation of that law. I've seen plenty of
    T-shirts celebrating one British band or another over the years that
    featured a British flag worn proudly by fans of the band in question.

    Speaking of bands and politics, I just saw this today:

    https://ibb.co/j9VVvXpn

    The Steve Miller Band has canceled all dates for its 2025 North American tour due to the general trend of climate change-induced weather disasters:

    "The combination of extreme heat, unpredictable flooding, tornadoes, hurricanes, and massive forest fires make these risks for you, our audience, the band, and the crew unacceptable."

    So basically the band has effectively played their last concert and retired because there's never going to be day in the future where storms and wildfires
    don't exist, even if 'climate change' was somehow solved.'

    But it's not a cult...


    Sounds to me like a fake excuse for cancelling the tour. I'm betting
    ticket sales were awful - the Steve Miller Band wasn't very good in
    their heyday and it's been decades since then so who's going to lay out hundreds of dollars a ticket to see them? - but rather than admit they
    were past their "best before date", they decided to go out with some
    serious virtue-signalling about "climate change".

    --
    Rhino

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BTR1701@21:1/5 to moviePig on Thu Jul 17 16:58:51 2025
    On Jul 17, 2025 at 8:14:18 AM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 7/17/2025 1:18 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 16, 2025 at 7:39:40 PM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote: >>
    On 7/16/2025 10:02 PM, anim8rfsk wrote:
    Rhino <[email protected]> wrote:

    Her entire school had a Cultural Diversity Day and all students were >>>>> told to wear something celebrating her own culture instead of the usual
    school uniforms so she wore a dress that was essentially a British flag.
    She was an A student but found herself punished for her choice of >>>>> clothing - along with other students - and her parents were called to >>>>> pick her up early.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PE2jV5qxE4g [8 minutes]

    Her parents were not at all happy and her community was very agitated as
    well. The school gave an after-the-fact "apology" where they promised to
    reconsider how the event was run the next year. I'll believe that when I
    see it!


    I’ve seen that and it wasn’t clear to me if maybe she got punished under a
    flag rule. When I was her age, it was illegal to wear clothing made from
    the American flag.

    In today's (and yesterday's, and the day before's...) political climate, >>> it's also possible that she was brandishing an anti-diversity sentiment. >>
    Which in a country with a 1st Amendment and a robust protection of free
    speech
    can and should never be grounds for discipline. People, even school
    children,
    are allowed to have an opinion on issues of public concern that are contrary
    to those of the strutting martinets who run the school.

    (Yes, I know this was England and they don't have a 1st Amendment, though >> they
    do claim to value free speech in theory, even if less and less in practice >> as
    time goes on.)

    Yes, but I continue to hope for a difference between speech to inform
    and speech to injure.

    And the distinction between the two will be left to the aforementioned martinets to determine, yes?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From moviePig@21:1/5 to Rhino on Thu Jul 17 13:48:37 2025
    On 7/17/2025 12:00 PM, Rhino wrote:
    On 2025-07-16 10:39 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 7/16/2025 10:02 PM, anim8rfsk wrote:
    Rhino <[email protected]> wrote:
    Her entire school had a Cultural Diversity Day and all students were
    told to wear something celebrating her own culture instead of the usual >>>> school uniforms so she wore a dress that was essentially a British
    flag.
    She was an A student but found herself punished for her choice of
    clothing - along with other students - and her parents were called to
    pick her up early.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PE2jV5qxE4g [8 minutes]

    Her parents were not at all happy and her community was very
    agitated as
    well. The school gave an after-the-fact "apology" where they
    promised to
    reconsider how the event was run the next year. I'll believe that
    when I
    see it!


    I’ve seen that and it wasn’t clear to me if maybe she got punished
    under a
    flag rule. When I was her age, it was illegal to wear clothing made from >>> the American flag.

    In today's (and yesterday's, and the day before's...) political
    climate, it's also possible that she was brandishing an anti-diversity
    sentiment.   Even if she wasn't, I'd guess someone assumed she was.


    Did you actually watch the fucking video? They show what she wore and it shouldn't have been "problematic" to anyone unless they had a hate on
    for the UK. Leo also read the speech which she had planned to give which totally embraced diversity and all the other cultures represented at the school. Anyone who found some kind of racism in either is completely demented.

    No, I didn't watch the (fucking) video. It wasn't germane to my point.
    Taking your word here for what's it shows, yes, the school
    administrators suck ...quelle surprise.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From moviePig@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jul 17 13:45:06 2025
    On 7/17/2025 12:58 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 17, 2025 at 8:14:18 AM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 7/17/2025 1:18 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 16, 2025 at 7:39:40 PM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>
    On 7/16/2025 10:02 PM, anim8rfsk wrote:
    Rhino <[email protected]> wrote:

    Her entire school had a Cultural Diversity Day and all students were >>>>>> told to wear something celebrating her own culture instead of the usual
    school uniforms so she wore a dress that was essentially a British flag.
    She was an A student but found herself punished for her choice of >>>>>> clothing - along with other students - and her parents were called to
    pick her up early.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PE2jV5qxE4g [8 minutes]

    Her parents were not at all happy and her community was very agitated as
    well. The school gave an after-the-fact "apology" where they promised to
    reconsider how the event was run the next year. I'll believe that when I
    see it!


    I’ve seen that and it wasn’t clear to me if maybe she got punished under a
    flag rule. When I was her age, it was illegal to wear clothing made from
    the American flag.

    In today's (and yesterday's, and the day before's...) political climate, >>>> it's also possible that she was brandishing an anti-diversity sentiment. >>>
    Which in a country with a 1st Amendment and a robust protection of free >>> speech
    can and should never be grounds for discipline. People, even school
    children,
    are allowed to have an opinion on issues of public concern that are contrary
    to those of the strutting martinets who run the school.

    (Yes, I know this was England and they don't have a 1st Amendment, though >>> they
    do claim to value free speech in theory, even if less and less in practice
    as
    time goes on.)

    Yes, but I continue to hope for a difference between speech to inform
    and speech to injure.

    And the distinction between the two will be left to the aforementioned martinets to determine, yes?

    Not sure why you'd think such judges harder to find than any others.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Horny Goat@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Fri Jul 18 02:17:56 2025
    On Wed, 16 Jul 2025 23:56:31 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman"
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    This is such a sad story. The girl actually liked school and was
    thriving. I hope she learned her lesson but I have no idea what it might
    be.

    The trouble is in the UK the "lesson" is more and more becoming that
    there's one rule for immigrants (especially Muslim immigrants) and
    native Brits.

    And god help the Brit who insists on a difference between properly
    landed immigrants and those who just take a boat from France without
    legal entrnace to Britain.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Horny Goat@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Fri Jul 18 02:15:35 2025
    On Wed, 16 Jul 2025 18:33:02 -0400, Rhino
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    Her entire school had a Cultural Diversity Day and all students were
    told to wear something celebrating her own culture instead of the usual >school uniforms so she wore a dress that was essentially a British flag.
    She was an A student but found herself punished for her choice of
    clothing - along with other students - and her parents were called to
    pick her up early.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PE2jV5qxE4g [8 minutes]

    Her parents were not at all happy and her community was very agitated as >well. The school gave an after-the-fact "apology" where they promised to >reconsider how the event was run the next year. I'll believe that when I
    see it!

    Yeah I heard about that one too and it seemed to me yet another
    example of "Two Tier".

    I'd love to have my daughter's opinion on this (she lives in southern
    England) but she'd probably think I was making politics and she
    disagrees with almost all my political opinions.

    She >IS< very pleased to live in one of the two electoral districts
    (Rhino - I'd normally just say "ridings" but that would confuse
    everyone but you and me) in the UK that has a Green party MP.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Horny Goat@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jul 18 02:24:49 2025
    On Thu, 17 Jul 2025 05:18:46 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701 <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    (Yes, I know this was England and they don't have a 1st Amendment, though they >do claim to value free speech in theory, even if less and less in practice as >time goes on.)

    The problem in the UK (and Canada) is not so much "free speech" but
    rather whether or not a particular type of speech is OK depending on
    what group the observer thinks you belong to.

    On the other hand, at least 2 Jewish Canadian MPs are fighting to have
    Canada Immigration deny Bob Vylan an entry visa after his UK "Death
    deth to the IDF" rant in Britain. (I happen to agree with them as it's
    not legal in Canada to call for the death of another person)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Horny Goat@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jul 18 02:20:16 2025
    On Wed, 16 Jul 2025 19:02:00 -0700, anim8rfsk <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    I’ve seen that and it wasn’t clear to me if maybe she got punished under a >flag rule. When I was her age, it was illegal to wear clothing made from
    the American flag.

    For sure she would have been tarred and feathered if she had appeared
    in an English flag (e.g. the cross of St George) as opposed to the UK
    flag. I saw a photo of her and she looked fairly good in the outfit.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Horny Goat@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Fri Jul 18 02:26:03 2025
    On Thu, 17 Jul 2025 12:00:16 -0400, Rhino
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    Did you actually watch the fucking video? They show what she wore and it >shouldn't have been "problematic" to anyone unless they had a hate on
    for the UK. Leo also read the speech which she had planned to give which >totally embraced diversity and all the other cultures represented at the >school. Anyone who found some kind of racism in either is completely >demented.

    Or more likely a political axe to grind.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Horny Goat@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jul 18 02:38:39 2025
    On Thu, 17 Jul 2025 05:13:51 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701 <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    After reconsideration, I'm sure they'll conclude that where they went wrong >was not making it clear from the start that the event doesn't include white >people and/or British history or culture. Next year's flyer will be sure to >make that explicit, with instructions to the white kids to just wear their >normal school uniforms while everyone else dresses up.

    What are you saying? That white folks or native Brits don't have a
    culture?

    Because when I heard the interview with the school that seemed to be
    exactly what they were claiming. To which I say "Bollocks!"

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Horny Goat@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Fri Jul 18 02:36:03 2025
    On Thu, 17 Jul 2025 12:08:45 -0400, Rhino
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    Her entire school had a Cultural Diversity Day and all students were >>>>> told to wear something celebrating her own culture instead of the usual >>>>> school uniforms so she wore a dress that was essentially a British flag.
    She was an A student but found herself punished for her choice of
    clothing - along with other students - and her parents were called to >>>>> pick her up early.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PE2jV5qxE4g [8 minutes]

    Her parents were not at all happy and her community was very agitated as
    well. The school gave an after-the-fact "apology" where they promised to
    reconsider how the event was run the next year. I'll believe that when I
    see it!

    And if the school had said "you can't wear a flag that way!" you
    wouldn't have heard that story - but they didn't and claimed it was anti-everybody NOT born in the UK - and that DID make it a news story.

    I saw the picture of her and thought she wore it quite well - and
    wasn't at all making it a parody (or a slur against those not British
    born) as some have claimed.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Horny Goat@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Fri Jul 18 02:31:47 2025
    On Wed, 16 Jul 2025 22:48:38 -0400, Rhino
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    Of course, wearing clothing that featured the *English* flag is a whole >different kettle of fish! The flag that we see all the time representing
    the UK is an amalgamation of the flags of England, Scotland and Wales
    when they were separate countries (that sometimes went to war with one >another) but when they settled all those disputes (more or less) and
    merged into the same country, the flag was a merger of the flags of
    England, Scotland and Wales. Flying the old flag of England - the St.
    George flag - is "problematic" in the UK these days. "Progressives" see
    it as representing a coarse nationalism steeped in racism.

    I don't know if it is actually illegal to fly the English flag but I
    would expect AT LEAST to be soundly scorned by neighbours and passersby
    if you do.

    Hmm, just out of curiousity, I did another image search for T-shirts
    with the *English* flag and got this:

    https://www.google.ca/search?q=t-shirts+containing+flag+of+england&udm=2

    Except of course in international competitions where in many sports
    the various British nationalities field separate teams. We were in
    London in June 2016 when the EuroCup soccer tournament was going on
    and both England and Northern Ireland had separate teams. In the bar
    near our hotel they had about 15 TVs showing the games and I got asked
    who I was cheering for - and the questioner CLEARLY wanted me to say
    "England". He did it aggressively enough I WASN'T going to come hell
    or high water so I said "well actually I'm from Canada and don't
    really follow football" but he persisted so I finally said "Northern
    Ireland I suppose". He was surprised and asked why - to which I made
    him happy by saying "well both my mother's parents were from
    Belfast...."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Adam H. Kerman@21:1/5 to The Horny Goat on Fri Jul 18 17:36:21 2025
    The Horny Goat <[email protected]> wrote:
    Thu, 17 Jul 2025 05:18:46 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701 <[email protected]>:

    (Yes, I know this was England and they don't have a 1st Amendment,
    though they do claim to value free speech in theory, even if less and
    less in practice as time goes on.)

    The problem in the UK (and Canada) is not so much "free speech" but
    rather whether or not a particular type of speech is OK depending on
    what group the observer thinks you belong to.

    I don't know what you are talking about. If speech may be censored
    depending on what the listener believes, then that's not freedom of
    speech in American law and something the UK and Canada both lack.

    On the other hand, at least 2 Jewish Canadian MPs are fighting to have
    Canada Immigration deny Bob Vylan an entry visa after his UK "Death
    deth to the IDF" rant in Britain. (I happen to agree with them as it's
    not legal in Canada to call for the death of another person)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BTR1701@21:1/5 to The Horny Goat on Fri Jul 18 20:11:22 2025
    On Jul 18, 2025 at 2:17:56 AM PDT, "The Horny Goat" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On Wed, 16 Jul 2025 23:56:31 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman"
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    This is such a sad story. The girl actually liked school and was
    thriving. I hope she learned her lesson but I have no idea what it might
    be.

    The trouble is in the UK the "lesson" is more and more becoming that
    there's one rule for immigrants (especially Muslim immigrants) and
    native Brits.

    And god help the Brit who insists on a difference between properly
    landed immigrants and those who just take a boat from France without
    legal entrnace to Britain.

    Douglas Murray pointed out that you're damned if you do and damned if you
    don't with these things. If the girl shows up dressed honoring her own
    culture, she's a white supremacist. If she shows up dressed as another
    culture, she'd be condemned for cultural appropriation.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BTR1701@21:1/5 to The Horny Goat on Fri Jul 18 20:13:21 2025
    On Jul 18, 2025 at 2:36:03 AM PDT, "The Horny Goat" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On Thu, 17 Jul 2025 12:08:45 -0400, Rhino
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    Her entire school had a Cultural Diversity Day and all students were >>>>>> told to wear something celebrating her own culture instead of the usual
    school uniforms so she wore a dress that was essentially a British flag.
    She was an A student but found herself punished for her choice of >>>>>> clothing - along with other students - and her parents were called to >>>>>> pick her up early.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PE2jV5qxE4g [8 minutes]

    Her parents were not at all happy and her community was very agitated as
    well. The school gave an after-the-fact "apology" where they promised to
    reconsider how the event was run the next year. I'll believe that when I
    see it!

    And if the school had said "you can't wear a flag that way!" you
    wouldn't have heard that story - but they didn't and claimed it was anti-everybody NOT born in the UK - and that DID make it a news story.

    If she'd showed up wearing a dress modeled after the Palestinian flag and chanting, "From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free!", they'd have probably given her a "Student of the Month" award.

    I saw the picture of her and thought she wore it quite well - and
    wasn't at all making it a parody (or a slur against those not British
    born) as some have claimed.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BTR1701@21:1/5 to The Horny Goat on Fri Jul 18 20:16:16 2025
    On Jul 18, 2025 at 2:38:39 AM PDT, "The Horny Goat" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On Thu, 17 Jul 2025 05:13:51 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701 <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    After reconsideration, I'm sure they'll conclude that where they went wrong >> was not making it clear from the start that the event doesn't include white >> people and/or British history or culture. Next year's flyer will be sure to >> make that explicit, with instructions to the white kids to just wear their >> normal school uniforms while everyone else dresses up.

    What are you saying? That white folks or native Brits don't have a
    culture?

    No, I'm saying that the 'progressive' leftists running the school want to pretend that Britain doesn't have a culture or at least not one worth celebrating.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From moviePig@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jul 18 16:42:19 2025
    On 7/17/2025 1:13 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 16, 2025 at 3:33:02 PM PDT, "Rhino" <[email protected]> wrote:

    Her entire school had a Cultural Diversity Day and all students were
    told to wear something celebrating her own culture instead of the usual
    school uniforms so she wore a dress that was essentially a British flag.
    She was an A student but found herself punished for her choice of
    clothing - along with other students - and her parents were called to
    pick her up early.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PE2jV5qxE4g [8 minutes]

    Her parents were not at all happy and her community was very agitated as
    well. The school gave an after-the-fact "apology" where they promised to
    reconsider how the event was run the next year. I'll believe that when I
    see it!

    Oh, I'm sure they are truly reconsidering how the event will be run in the future. This time around, the flyer with the instructions for the event said to come dressed in a manner expressing your nationality or family heritage, and didn't exclude white native-born British nationality and heritage.

    After reconsideration, I'm sure they'll conclude that where they went wrong was not making it clear from the start that the event doesn't include white people and/or British history or culture. Next year's flyer will be sure to make that explicit, with instructions to the white kids to just wear their normal school uniforms while everyone else dresses up.

    Or... they could say that, since everyone at the school is daily
    surrounded by British culture, the event is meant to showcase a variety
    of others.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BTR1701@21:1/5 to moviePig on Fri Jul 18 20:54:17 2025
    On Jul 18, 2025 at 1:42:19 PM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 7/17/2025 1:13 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 16, 2025 at 3:33:02 PM PDT, "Rhino" <[email protected]> >> wrote:

    Her entire school had a Cultural Diversity Day and all students were
    told to wear something celebrating her own culture instead of the usual >>> school uniforms so she wore a dress that was essentially a British flag. >>> She was an A student but found herself punished for her choice of
    clothing - along with other students - and her parents were called to
    pick her up early.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PE2jV5qxE4g [8 minutes]

    Her parents were not at all happy and her community was very agitated as >>> well. The school gave an after-the-fact "apology" where they promised to >>> reconsider how the event was run the next year. I'll believe that when I >>> see it!

    Oh, I'm sure they are truly reconsidering how the event will be run in the >> future. This time around, the flyer with the instructions for the event said
    to come dressed in a manner expressing your nationality or family heritage, >> and didn't exclude white native-born British nationality and heritage.

    After reconsideration, I'm sure they'll conclude that where they went wrong >> was not making it clear from the start that the event doesn't include white >> people and/or British history or culture. Next year's flyer will be sure to >> make that explicit, with instructions to the white kids to just wear their >> normal school uniforms while everyone else dresses up.

    Or... they could say that, since everyone at the school is daily
    surrounded by British culture, the event is meant to showcase a variety
    of others.

    You'd make a wonderful school administrator.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Adam H. Kerman@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Fri Jul 18 21:20:28 2025
    BTR1701 <[email protected]> wrote:
    On Jul 18, 2025 at 1:42:19 PM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 7/17/2025 1:13 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 16, 2025 at 3:33:02 PM PDT, "Rhino" <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    Her entire school had a Cultural Diversity Day and all students were
    told to wear something celebrating her own culture instead of the usual >>>> school uniforms so she wore a dress that was essentially a British flag. >>>> She was an A student but found herself punished for her choice of
    clothing - along with other students - and her parents were called to >>>> pick her up early.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PE2jV5qxE4g [8 minutes]

    Her parents were not at all happy and her community was very agitated as >>>> well. The school gave an after-the-fact "apology" where they promised to >>>> reconsider how the event was run the next year. I'll believe that when I >>>> see it!

    Oh, I'm sure they are truly reconsidering how the event will be run in the >>> future. This time around, the flyer with the instructions for the event said
    to come dressed in a manner expressing your nationality or family heritage,
    and didn't exclude white native-born British nationality and heritage.

    After reconsideration, I'm sure they'll conclude that where they went wrong
    was not making it clear from the start that the event doesn't include white
    people and/or British history or culture. Next year's flyer will be sure to
    make that explicit, with instructions to the white kids to just wear their >>> normal school uniforms while everyone else dresses up.

    Or... they could say that, since everyone at the school is daily
    surrounded by British culture, the event is meant to showcase a variety
    of others.

    You'd make a wonderful school administrator.

    Oh! That's mean.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From moviePig@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jul 18 17:36:07 2025
    On 7/18/2025 4:54 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 18, 2025 at 1:42:19 PM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 7/17/2025 1:13 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 16, 2025 at 3:33:02 PM PDT, "Rhino" <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    Her entire school had a Cultural Diversity Day and all students were >>>> told to wear something celebrating her own culture instead of the usual >>>> school uniforms so she wore a dress that was essentially a British flag. >>>> She was an A student but found herself punished for her choice of
    clothing - along with other students - and her parents were called to >>>> pick her up early.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PE2jV5qxE4g [8 minutes]

    Her parents were not at all happy and her community was very agitated as >>>> well. The school gave an after-the-fact "apology" where they promised to >>>> reconsider how the event was run the next year. I'll believe that when I >>>> see it!

    Oh, I'm sure they are truly reconsidering how the event will be run in the
    future. This time around, the flyer with the instructions for the event said
    to come dressed in a manner expressing your nationality or family heritage,
    and didn't exclude white native-born British nationality and heritage. >>>
    After reconsideration, I'm sure they'll conclude that where they went wrong
    was not making it clear from the start that the event doesn't include white
    people and/or British history or culture. Next year's flyer will be sure to
    make that explicit, with instructions to the white kids to just wear their
    normal school uniforms while everyone else dresses up.

    Or... they could say that, since everyone at the school is daily
    surrounded by British culture, the event is meant to showcase a variety
    of others.

    You'd make a wonderful school administrator.

    I'll be sure to give you as a reference.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From moviePig@21:1/5 to Adam H. Kerman on Fri Jul 18 17:37:47 2025
    On 7/18/2025 5:20 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
    BTR1701 <[email protected]> wrote:
    On Jul 18, 2025 at 1:42:19 PM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 7/17/2025 1:13 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 16, 2025 at 3:33:02 PM PDT, "Rhino" <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    Her entire school had a Cultural Diversity Day and all students were >>>>> told to wear something celebrating her own culture instead of the usual >>>>> school uniforms so she wore a dress that was essentially a British flag.
    She was an A student but found herself punished for her choice of
    clothing - along with other students - and her parents were called to >>>>> pick her up early.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PE2jV5qxE4g [8 minutes]

    Her parents were not at all happy and her community was very agitated as
    well. The school gave an after-the-fact "apology" where they promised to
    reconsider how the event was run the next year. I'll believe that when I
    see it!

    Oh, I'm sure they are truly reconsidering how the event will be run in the
    future. This time around, the flyer with the instructions for the event said
    to come dressed in a manner expressing your nationality or family heritage,
    and didn't exclude white native-born British nationality and heritage. >>>>
    After reconsideration, I'm sure they'll conclude that where they went wrong
    was not making it clear from the start that the event doesn't include white
    people and/or British history or culture. Next year's flyer will be sure to
    make that explicit, with instructions to the white kids to just wear their
    normal school uniforms while everyone else dresses up.

    Or... they could say that, since everyone at the school is daily
    surrounded by British culture, the event is meant to showcase a variety
    of others.

    You'd make a wonderful school administrator.

    Oh! That's mean.

    And *that's* obscene...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Your Name@21:1/5 to The Horny Goat on Sat Jul 19 15:31:09 2025
    On 2025-07-18 09:38:39 +0000, The Horny Goat said:
    On Thu, 17 Jul 2025 05:13:51 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701 <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    After reconsideration, I'm sure they'll conclude that where they went wrong >> was not making it clear from the start that the event doesn't include white >> people and/or British history or culture. Next year's flyer will be sure to >> make that explicit, with instructions to the white kids to just wear their >> normal school uniforms while everyone else dresses up.

    What are you saying? That white folks or native Brits don't have a
    culture?

    Because when I heard the interview with the school that seemed to be
    exactly what they were claiming. To which I say "Bollocks!"

    I doubt there are actually any "native Brits", at least none who are
    100% 'British'. The UK has been invaded throughout history by the
    Norwegians, the Danish, the Romans, etc. Then there are the more
    peaceful migrations with people travelling between England, Wales,
    Scotland, and Ireland, and the rest of Europe. More modern times
    includes people from numerous other countries (both legally and
    illegally). Even the British Royal family comes from German ancestry.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Your Name@21:1/5 to The Horny Goat on Sat Jul 19 15:42:18 2025
    On 2025-07-18 09:36:03 +0000, The Horny Goat said:
    On Thu, 17 Jul 2025 12:08:45 -0400, Rhino
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    Her entire school had a Cultural Diversity Day and all students were >>>>>> told to wear something celebrating her own culture instead of the usual >>>>>> school uniforms so she wore a dress that was essentially a British >>>>>> flag. She was an A student but found herself punished for her choice of >>>>>> clothing - along with other students - and her parents were called to >>>>>> pick her up early.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PE2jV5qxE4g [8 minutes]

    Her parents were not at all happy and her community was very agitated >>>>>> as well. The school gave an after-the-fact "apology" where they
    promised to reconsider how the event was run the next year. I'll
    believe that when I see it!

    And if the school had said "you can't wear a flag that way!" you
    wouldn't have heard that story - but they didn't and claimed it was anti-everybody NOT born in the UK - and that DID make it a news story.

    I saw the picture of her and thought she wore it quite well - and
    wasn't at all making it a parody (or a slur against those not British
    born) as some have claimed.

    Not really a problem of being a slur or a parody, but simply that flags themselves are seen by a small number of Politically Correct nutters as
    having bad symbolism.

    For the UK's flag, they stupidly see a sign of the oppression native
    people in various countries that the British Empire controlled
    centuries ago. Similarly, in America the Confederate flag is stupidly
    seen by small number of loud-mouthed nutters as being a symbol of
    slavery, so forcing it to be removed from various places, including
    replicas of the "Dukes of Hazard" General Lee car (no doubt they also
    whined on about the naming of that car).

    There are also people who complain about countries like New Zealand and Australia having the Union Jack in the corner of their flag, and trying
    to get the flags changed (at one point wasting huge amounts of
    tax-payer money on a stupid referrendum vote in New Zealand, which
    resulted unsurprisingly in NOT changing the flag, but still fools keep
    trying to push for a change). Then of course there is the complete
    opposite, where the Hawaiian flag has a Union Jack in the corner
    depsite now being part of the United States.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Your Name@21:1/5 to The Horny Goat on Sat Jul 19 15:32:42 2025
    On 2025-07-18 09:26:03 +0000, The Horny Goat said:
    On Thu, 17 Jul 2025 12:00:16 -0400, Rhino
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    Did you actually watch the fucking video? They show what she wore and it
    shouldn't have been "problematic" to anyone unless they had a hate on
    for the UK. Leo also read the speech which she had planned to give which
    totally embraced diversity and all the other cultures represented at the
    school. Anyone who found some kind of racism in either is completely
    demented.

    Or more likely a political axe to grind.

    Even more likely, simply trying to appease the Politically Correct
    nutters and over-reacted.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BTR1701@21:1/5 to Your Name on Sat Jul 19 06:39:14 2025
    On Jul 18, 2025 at 8:42:18 PM PDT, "Your Name" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 2025-07-18 09:36:03 +0000, The Horny Goat said:
    On Thu, 17 Jul 2025 12:08:45 -0400, Rhino
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    Her entire school had a Cultural Diversity Day and all students were >>>>>>> told to wear something celebrating her own culture instead of the usual
    school uniforms so she wore a dress that was essentially a British >>>>>>> flag. She was an A student but found herself punished for her choice of
    clothing - along with other students - and her parents were called to >>>>>>> pick her up early.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PE2jV5qxE4g [8 minutes]

    Her parents were not at all happy and her community was very agitated >>>>>>> as well. The school gave an after-the-fact "apology" where they >>>>>>> promised to reconsider how the event was run the next year. I'll >>>>>>> believe that when I see it!

    And if the school had said "you can't wear a flag that way!" you
    wouldn't have heard that story - but they didn't and claimed it was
    anti-everybody NOT born in the UK - and that DID make it a news story.

    I saw the picture of her and thought she wore it quite well - and
    wasn't at all making it a parody (or a slur against those not British
    born) as some have claimed.

    Not really a problem of being a slur or a parody, but simply that flags themselves are seen by a small number of Politically Correct nutters as having bad symbolism.

    For the UK's flag, they stupidly see a sign of the oppression native
    people in various countries that the British Empire controlled
    centuries ago. Similarly, in America the Confederate flag is stupidly
    seen by small number of loud-mouthed nutters as being a symbol of
    slavery, so forcing it to be removed from various places, including
    replicas of the "Dukes of Hazard" General Lee car (no doubt they also
    whined on about the naming of that car).

    They not only removed it from replicas of the General Lee, they removed it
    from the *actual* General Lee.

    If you take the VIP studio tour at Warner Bros., one of the stops is a display of various picture cars used in movies and TV shows over the years--
    everything from the many incarnations of the Batmobile, to the Scooby Doo Mystery Machine and Austin Powers' Mini Cooper. They also have one of the original DUKES OF HAZZARD General Lees on display,** but with no Confederate flag on the roof, which prompted another guy on the tour to doubt its authenticity. The tour guide told us that he'd been officially instructed to tell people that it was never actually there (even though you can still see hints of it beneath the orange paint) but that the real reason is that studio bowed to political correctness when some guests claimed to be offended by it and decided to rewrite that bit of TV history.

    (**There were actually dozens of General Lees used in the show, most of which were destroyed in the various stunts. The one in the museum is the 'hero' car that was kept pristine for closeups.)

    So to all those like FPP who claimed they weren't about sanitizing history and that such things like the Confederate flag are fine if confined to a museums, here's an example of how even museums are pressured to (and cave to) political correctness.

    I'm surprised that even in re-runs of the show itself, they haven't CGI-d- the flag off the car's roof (or even worse, replaced it with a rainbow flag).

    There are also people who complain about countries like New Zealand and Australia having the Union Jack in the corner of their flag, and trying
    to get the flags changed (at one point wasting huge amounts of
    tax-payer money on a stupid referendum vote in New Zealand, which
    resulted unsurprisingly in NOT changing the flag, but still fools keep
    trying to push for a change). Then of course there is the complete
    opposite, where the Hawaiian flag has a Union Jack in the corner
    depsite now being part of the United States.

    A couple of years ago Minnesota decided to change its state flag for the first time since it was admitted as a state.

    Here's the old flag:

    https://ibb.co/bjPhytNB

    Here's the new flag:

    https://ibb.co/nNtkJCwg

    A lot of people have remarked how similar the new flag is to the flag of Somalia:

    https://ibb.co/k2jVGLZ7

    ...and how coincidental that is considering how large the Somali immigrant population is in Minnesota and how Ilhan Omar (the congressional
    representative for Somalia) is nominally from Minnesota.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From NoBody@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jul 19 10:23:57 2025
    On Fri, 18 Jul 2025 20:11:22 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701 <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    On Jul 18, 2025 at 2:17:56 AM PDT, "The Horny Goat" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On Wed, 16 Jul 2025 23:56:31 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman"
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    This is such a sad story. The girl actually liked school and was
    thriving. I hope she learned her lesson but I have no idea what it might >>> be.

    The trouble is in the UK the "lesson" is more and more becoming that
    there's one rule for immigrants (especially Muslim immigrants) and
    native Brits.

    And god help the Brit who insists on a difference between properly
    landed immigrants and those who just take a boat from France without
    legal entrnace to Britain.

    Douglas Murray pointed out that you're damned if you do and damned if you >don't with these things. If the girl shows up dressed honoring her own >culture, she's a white supremacist. If she shows up dressed as another >culture, she'd be condemned for cultural appropriation.


    Let's call it what it is: No free speach for white people. We're
    going down some very dark hallways.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From moviePig@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jul 19 12:27:22 2025
    On 7/19/2025 2:39 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 18, 2025 at 8:42:18 PM PDT, "Your Name" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 2025-07-18 09:36:03 +0000, The Horny Goat said:
    On Thu, 17 Jul 2025 12:08:45 -0400, Rhino
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    Her entire school had a Cultural Diversity Day and all students were >>>>>>>> told to wear something celebrating her own culture instead of the usual
    school uniforms so she wore a dress that was essentially a British >>>>>>>> flag. She was an A student but found herself punished for her choice of
    clothing - along with other students - and her parents were called to
    pick her up early.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PE2jV5qxE4g [8 minutes]

    Her parents were not at all happy and her community was very agitated
    as well. The school gave an after-the-fact "apology" where they >>>>>>>> promised to reconsider how the event was run the next year. I'll >>>>>>>> believe that when I see it!

    And if the school had said "you can't wear a flag that way!" you
    wouldn't have heard that story - but they didn't and claimed it was
    anti-everybody NOT born in the UK - and that DID make it a news story. >>>
    I saw the picture of her and thought she wore it quite well - and
    wasn't at all making it a parody (or a slur against those not British
    born) as some have claimed.

    Not really a problem of being a slur or a parody, but simply that flags
    themselves are seen by a small number of Politically Correct nutters as
    having bad symbolism.

    For the UK's flag, they stupidly see a sign of the oppression native
    people in various countries that the British Empire controlled
    centuries ago. Similarly, in America the Confederate flag is stupidly
    seen by small number of loud-mouthed nutters as being a symbol of
    slavery, so forcing it to be removed from various places, including
    replicas of the "Dukes of Hazard" General Lee car (no doubt they also
    whined on about the naming of that car).

    They not only removed it from replicas of the General Lee, they removed it from the *actual* General Lee.

    If you take the VIP studio tour at Warner Bros., one of the stops is a display
    of various picture cars used in movies and TV shows over the years-- everything from the many incarnations of the Batmobile, to the Scooby Doo Mystery Machine and Austin Powers' Mini Cooper. They also have one of the original DUKES OF HAZZARD General Lees on display,** but with no Confederate flag on the roof, which prompted another guy on the tour to doubt its authenticity. The tour guide told us that he'd been officially instructed to tell people that it was never actually there (even though you can still see hints of it beneath the orange paint) but that the real reason is that studio bowed to political correctness when some guests claimed to be offended by it and decided to rewrite that bit of TV history.

    (**There were actually dozens of General Lees used in the show, most of which were destroyed in the various stunts. The one in the museum is the 'hero' car that was kept pristine for closeups.)

    So to all those like FPP who claimed they weren't about sanitizing history and
    that such things like the Confederate flag are fine if confined to a museums, here's an example of how even museums are pressured to (and cave to) political
    correctness.

    I'm surprised that even in re-runs of the show itself, they haven't CGI-d- the
    flag off the car's roof (or even worse, replaced it with a rainbow flag).

    There are also people who complain about countries like New Zealand and
    Australia having the Union Jack in the corner of their flag, and trying
    to get the flags changed (at one point wasting huge amounts of
    tax-payer money on a stupid referendum vote in New Zealand, which
    resulted unsurprisingly in NOT changing the flag, but still fools keep
    trying to push for a change). Then of course there is the complete
    opposite, where the Hawaiian flag has a Union Jack in the corner
    depsite now being part of the United States.

    A couple of years ago Minnesota decided to change its state flag for the first
    time since it was admitted as a state.

    Here's the old flag:

    https://ibb.co/bjPhytNB

    Here's the new flag:

    https://ibb.co/nNtkJCwg

    A lot of people have remarked how similar the new flag is to the flag of Somalia:

    https://ibb.co/k2jVGLZ7

    ...and how coincidental that is considering how large the Somali immigrant population is in Minnesota and how Ilhan Omar (the congressional representative for Somalia) is nominally from Minnesota.

    Today, the closest verbalization of flag-flying is: "Proud To Be A...",
    where the thing one's proud to be was neither earned nor even avoidable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rhino@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jul 19 18:21:41 2025
    On 2025-07-18 4:16 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 18, 2025 at 2:38:39 AM PDT, "The Horny Goat" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On Thu, 17 Jul 2025 05:13:51 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701 <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    After reconsideration, I'm sure they'll conclude that where they went wrong >>> was not making it clear from the start that the event doesn't include white >>> people and/or British history or culture. Next year's flyer will be sure to >>> make that explicit, with instructions to the white kids to just wear their >>> normal school uniforms while everyone else dresses up.

    What are you saying? That white folks or native Brits don't have a
    culture?

    No, I'm saying that the 'progressive' leftists running the school want to pretend that Britain doesn't have a culture or at least not one worth celebrating.


    I expect the people organizing the event would be delighted if the
    British-born whites wore clothes demonstrating their contempt for
    slavery and colonialism and glossed over the fact that Britain led the
    fight against slavery and spent staggering amounts of many and many
    lives in that effort. Clothes with rainbow motifs would probably win the students some brownie points too.

    --
    Rhino

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rhino@21:1/5 to moviePig on Sat Jul 19 18:16:27 2025
    On 2025-07-19 12:27 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 7/19/2025 2:39 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 18, 2025 at 8:42:18 PM PDT, "Your Name" <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    On 2025-07-18 09:36:03 +0000, The Horny Goat said:
      On Thu, 17 Jul 2025 12:08:45 -0400, Rhino
      <[email protected]> wrote:
      Her entire school had a Cultural Diversity Day and all
    students were
      told to wear something celebrating her own culture instead of >>>>>>>>> the usual
      school uniforms so she wore a dress that was essentially a >>>>>>>>> British
      flag. She was an A student but found herself punished for her >>>>>>>>> choice of
      clothing - along with other students - and her parents were >>>>>>>>> called to
      pick her up early.
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PE2jV5qxE4g [8 minutes]
      Her parents were not at all happy and her community was very >>>>>>>>> agitated
      as well. The school gave an after-the-fact "apology" where they >>>>>>>>>   promised to reconsider how the event was run the next year. I'll >>>>>>>>>   believe that when I see it!
      And if the school had said "you can't wear a flag that way!" you
      wouldn't have heard that story - but they didn't and claimed it was >>>>   anti-everybody NOT born in the UK - and that DID make it a news
    story.
      I saw the picture of her and thought she wore it quite well - and
      wasn't at all making it a parody (or a slur against those not British >>>>   born) as some have claimed.

    Not really a problem of being a slur or a parody, but simply that flags
    themselves are seen by a small number of Politically Correct nutters as
    having bad symbolism.

    For the UK's flag, they stupidly see a sign of the oppression native
    people in various countries that the British Empire controlled
    centuries ago. Similarly, in America the Confederate flag is stupidly
    seen by small number of loud-mouthed nutters as being a symbol of
    slavery, so forcing it to be removed from various places, including
    replicas of the "Dukes of Hazard" General Lee car (no doubt they also
    whined on about the naming of that car).

    They not only removed it from replicas of the General Lee, they
    removed it
    from the *actual* General Lee.

    If you take the VIP studio tour at Warner Bros., one of the stops is a
    display
    of various picture cars used in movies and TV shows over the years--
    everything from the many incarnations of the Batmobile, to the Scooby Doo
    Mystery Machine and Austin Powers' Mini Cooper. They also have one of the
    original DUKES OF HAZZARD General Lees on display,** but with no
    Confederate
    flag on the roof, which prompted another guy on the tour to doubt its
    authenticity. The tour guide told us that he'd been officially
    instructed to
    tell people that it was never actually there (even though you can
    still see
    hints of it beneath the orange paint) but that the real reason is that
    studio
    bowed to political correctness when some guests claimed to be offended
    by it
    and decided to rewrite that bit of TV history.

    (**There were actually dozens of General Lees used in the show, most
    of which
    were destroyed in the various stunts. The one in the museum is the
    'hero' car
    that was kept pristine for closeups.)

    So to all those like FPP who claimed they weren't about sanitizing
    history and
    that such things like the Confederate flag are fine if confined to a
    museums,
    here's an example of how even museums are pressured to (and cave to)
    political
    correctness.

    I'm surprised that even in re-runs of the show itself, they haven't
    CGI-d- the
    flag off the car's roof (or even worse, replaced it with a rainbow flag).

    There are also people who complain about countries like New Zealand and
    Australia having the Union Jack in the corner of their flag, and trying
    to get the flags changed (at one point wasting huge amounts of
    tax-payer money on a stupid referendum vote in New Zealand, which
    resulted unsurprisingly in NOT changing the flag, but still fools keep
    trying to push for a change). Then of course there is the complete
    opposite, where the Hawaiian flag has a Union Jack in the corner
    depsite now being part of the United States.

    A couple of years ago Minnesota decided to change its state flag for
    the first
    time since it was admitted as a state.

    Here's the old flag:

    https://ibb.co/bjPhytNB

    Here's the new flag:

    https://ibb.co/nNtkJCwg

    A lot of people have remarked how similar the new flag is to the flag of
    Somalia:

    https://ibb.co/k2jVGLZ7

    ...and how coincidental that is considering how large the Somali
    immigrant
    population is in Minnesota and how Ilhan Omar (the congressional
    representative for Somalia) is nominally from Minnesota.

    Today, the closest verbalization of flag-flying is: "Proud To Be A...",
    where the thing one's proud to be was neither earned nor even avoidable.


    Once again, you interject an observation that is not on topic or even comprehensible to normal people. I don't know where you come up with
    these. I can only assume this is some bizarre way of proving how wise
    and worldly you think you are.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rhino@21:1/5 to The Horny Goat on Sat Jul 19 18:26:17 2025
    On 2025-07-18 5:15 AM, The Horny Goat wrote:
    On Wed, 16 Jul 2025 18:33:02 -0400, Rhino
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    Her entire school had a Cultural Diversity Day and all students were
    told to wear something celebrating her own culture instead of the usual
    school uniforms so she wore a dress that was essentially a British flag.
    She was an A student but found herself punished for her choice of
    clothing - along with other students - and her parents were called to
    pick her up early.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PE2jV5qxE4g [8 minutes]

    Her parents were not at all happy and her community was very agitated as
    well. The school gave an after-the-fact "apology" where they promised to
    reconsider how the event was run the next year. I'll believe that when I
    see it!

    Yeah I heard about that one too and it seemed to me yet another
    example of "Two Tier".

    I'd love to have my daughter's opinion on this (she lives in southern England) but she'd probably think I was making politics and she
    disagrees with almost all my political opinions.

    She >IS< very pleased to live in one of the two electoral districts
    (Rhino - I'd normally just say "ridings" but that would confuse
    everyone but you and me) in the UK that has a Green party MP.

    A proud supporter of the Watermelon Party? (Green on the outside, Red on
    the inside). Oh dear, my condolences.....

    --
    Rhino

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rhino@21:1/5 to moviePig on Sat Jul 19 18:23:28 2025
    On 2025-07-18 4:42 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 7/17/2025 1:13 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 16, 2025 at 3:33:02 PM PDT, "Rhino"
    <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    Her entire school had a Cultural Diversity Day and all students were
    told to wear something celebrating her own culture instead of the usual
    school uniforms so she wore a dress that was essentially a British flag. >>> She was an A student but found herself punished for her choice of
    clothing - along with other students - and her parents were called to
    pick her up early.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PE2jV5qxE4g [8 minutes]

    Her parents were not at all happy and her community was very agitated as >>> well. The school gave an after-the-fact "apology" where they promised to >>> reconsider how the event was run the next year. I'll believe that when I >>> see it!

    Oh, I'm sure they are truly reconsidering how the event will be run in
    the
    future. This time around, the flyer with the instructions for the
    event said
    to come dressed in a manner expressing your nationality or family
    heritage,
    and didn't exclude white native-born British nationality and heritage.

    After reconsideration, I'm sure they'll conclude that where they went
    wrong
    was not making it clear from the start that the event doesn't include
    white
    people and/or British history or culture. Next year's flyer will be
    sure to
    make that explicit, with instructions to the white kids to just wear
    their
    normal school uniforms while everyone else dresses up.

    Or... they could say that, since everyone at the school is daily
    surrounded by British culture, the event is meant to showcase a variety
    of others.


    So, every culture is to be celebrated EXCEPT that of the host country
    which welcomed all the others to their country.

    --
    Rhino

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Your Name@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jul 20 11:00:52 2025
    On 7/19/2025 2:39 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 18, 2025 at 8:42:18 PM PDT, "Your Name" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 2025-07-18 09:36:03 +0000, The Horny Goat said:
    On Thu, 17 Jul 2025 12:08:45 -0400, Rhino
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    Her entire school had a Cultural Diversity Day and all students were >>>>>>>> told to wear something celebrating her own culture instead of the usual
    school uniforms so she wore a dress that was essentially a British >>>>>>>> flag. She was an A student but found herself punished for her choice of
    clothing - along with other students - and her parents were called to >>>>>>>> pick her up early.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PE2jV5qxE4g [8 minutes]

    Her parents were not at all happy and her community was very agitated >>>>>>>> as well. The school gave an after-the-fact "apology" where they >>>>>>>> promised to reconsider how the event was run the next year. I'll >>>>>>>> believe that when I see it!

    And if the school had said "you can't wear a flag that way!" you
    wouldn't have heard that story - but they didn't and claimed it was
    anti-everybody NOT born in the UK - and that DID make it a news story.

    I saw the picture of her and thought she wore it quite well - and
    wasn't at all making it a parody (or a slur against those not British
    born) as some have claimed.

    Not really a problem of being a slur or a parody, but simply that flags
    themselves are seen by a small number of Politically Correct nutters as
    having bad symbolism.

    For the UK's flag, they stupidly see a sign of the oppression native
    people in various countries that the British Empire controlled
    centuries ago. Similarly, in America the Confederate flag is stupidly
    seen by small number of loud-mouthed nutters as being a symbol of
    slavery, so forcing it to be removed from various places, including
    replicas of the "Dukes of Hazard" General Lee car (no doubt they also
    whined on about the naming of that car).

    They not only removed it from replicas of the General Lee, they removed it from the *actual* General Lee.

    If you take the VIP studio tour at Warner Bros., one of the stops is a display
    of various picture cars used in movies and TV shows over the years-- everything from the many incarnations of the Batmobile, to the Scooby Doo Mystery Machine and Austin Powers' Mini Cooper. They also have one of the original DUKES OF HAZZARD General Lees on display,** but with no Confederate flag on the roof, which prompted another guy on the tour to doubt its authenticity. The tour guide told us that he'd been officially instructed to tell people that it was never actually there (even though you can still see hints of it beneath the orange paint) but that the real reason is that studio bowed to political correctness when some guests claimed to be offended by it and decided to rewrite that bit of TV history.

    (**There were actually dozens of General Lees used in the show, most of which were destroyed in the various stunts. The one in the museum is the 'hero' car that was kept pristine for closeups.)

    So to all those like FPP who claimed they weren't about sanitizing history and
    that such things like the Confederate flag are fine if confined to a museums, here's an example of how even museums are pressured to (and cave to) political
    correctness.

    I'm surprised that even in re-runs of the show itself, they haven't CGI-d- the
    flag off the car's roof (or even worse, replaced it with a rainbow flag).

    They did: <https://southinpopculture.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/11403081_10204903151883828_3598410428185521451_n1.jpg>


    ;-)



    There are also people who complain about countries like New Zealand and
    Australia having the Union Jack in the corner of their flag, and trying
    to get the flags changed (at one point wasting huge amounts of
    tax-payer money on a stupid referendum vote in New Zealand, which
    resulted unsurprisingly in NOT changing the flag, but still fools keep
    trying to push for a change). Then of course there is the complete
    opposite, where the Hawaiian flag has a Union Jack in the corner
    depsite now being part of the United States.

    A couple of years ago Minnesota decided to change its state flag for the first
    time since it was admitted as a state.

    Here's the old flag:

    https://ibb.co/bjPhytNB

    Here's the new flag:

    https://ibb.co/nNtkJCwg

    A lot of people have remarked how similar the new flag is to the flag of Somalia:

    https://ibb.co/k2jVGLZ7

    ...and how coincidental that is considering how large the Somali immigrant population is in Minnesota and how Ilhan Omar (the congressional representative for Somalia) is nominally from Minnesota.

    They've had competitions here to design a new New Zealand flag, usually
    the same old rubbish of a silver fern, a kiwi (the bird, no the
    kiwifruit), or various versions of a koru (a Maori sylished version of
    a curled fern frond).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rhino@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jul 19 20:35:08 2025
    On 2025-07-18 4:11 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 18, 2025 at 2:17:56 AM PDT, "The Horny Goat" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On Wed, 16 Jul 2025 23:56:31 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman"
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    This is such a sad story. The girl actually liked school and was
    thriving. I hope she learned her lesson but I have no idea what it might >>> be.

    The trouble is in the UK the "lesson" is more and more becoming that
    there's one rule for immigrants (especially Muslim immigrants) andE
    native Brits.

    And god help the Brit who insists on a difference between properly
    landed immigrants and those who just take a boat from France without
    legal entrnace to Britain.

    Douglas Murray pointed out that you're damned if you do and damned if you don't with these things. If the girl shows up dressed honoring her own culture, she's a white supremacist. If she shows up dressed as another culture, she'd be condemned for cultural appropriation.


    Exactly.

    It's amazing how the immigrants who Britain allowed in have somehow
    transformed themselves so that THEY are the ones setting all the rules.
    And all their rules insult the British at every opportunity!

    It's really not surprising that so many Brits express their frustration
    towards ungrateful immigrants whose focus seems to be trashing their
    hosts.

    As "Bob Vylan" told concert-goers at this year's Glastonbury festival
    (along with leading them in a chant of "Death death to the IDF!") "So
    you want your country back? Well it's not going to happen!" This was
    broadcast live on the BBC and caused such a furore that the BBC
    apologized for airing it. But of course the BBC champions that sort of statement so it's hard to take their apology seriously.


    --
    Rhino

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BTR1701@21:1/5 to Your Name on Sun Jul 20 04:48:38 2025
    On Jul 19, 2025 at 4:00:52 PM PDT, "Your Name" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 7/19/2025 2:39 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 18, 2025 at 8:42:18 PM PDT, "Your Name" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 2025-07-18 09:36:03 +0000, The Horny Goat said:
    On Thu, 17 Jul 2025 12:08:45 -0400, Rhino
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    Her entire school had a Cultural Diversity Day and all students were >>>>>>>>> told to wear something celebrating her own culture instead of the usual
    school uniforms so she wore a dress that was essentially a British >>>>>>>>> flag. She was an A student but found herself punished for her choice of
    clothing - along with other students - and her parents were called to
    pick her up early.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PE2jV5qxE4g [8 minutes]

    Her parents were not at all happy and her community was very agitated
    as well. The school gave an after-the-fact "apology" where they >>>>>>>>> promised to reconsider how the event was run the next year. I'll >>>>>>>>> believe that when I see it!

    And if the school had said "you can't wear a flag that way!" you
    wouldn't have heard that story - but they didn't and claimed it was
    anti-everybody NOT born in the UK - and that DID make it a news story. >>>>
    I saw the picture of her and thought she wore it quite well - and
    wasn't at all making it a parody (or a slur against those not British >>>> born) as some have claimed.

    Not really a problem of being a slur or a parody, but simply that flags >>> themselves are seen by a small number of Politically Correct nutters as >>> having bad symbolism.

    For the UK's flag, they stupidly see a sign of the oppression native
    people in various countries that the British Empire controlled
    centuries ago. Similarly, in America the Confederate flag is stupidly
    seen by small number of loud-mouthed nutters as being a symbol of
    slavery, so forcing it to be removed from various places, including
    replicas of the "Dukes of Hazard" General Lee car (no doubt they also
    whined on about the naming of that car).

    They not only removed it from replicas of the General Lee, they removed it >> from the *actual* General Lee.

    If you take the VIP studio tour at Warner Bros., one of the stops is a
    display
    of various picture cars used in movies and TV shows over the years--
    everything from the many incarnations of the Batmobile, to the Scooby Doo >> Mystery Machine and Austin Powers' Mini Cooper. They also have one of the >> original DUKES OF HAZZARD General Lees on display,** but with no Confederate
    flag on the roof, which prompted another guy on the tour to doubt its
    authenticity. The tour guide told us that he'd been officially instructed to
    tell people that it was never actually there (even though you can still see >> hints of it beneath the orange paint) but that the real reason is that
    studio
    bowed to political correctness when some guests claimed to be offended by it
    and decided to rewrite that bit of TV history.

    (**There were actually dozens of General Lees used in the show, most of
    which
    were destroyed in the various stunts. The one in the museum is the 'hero' >> car
    that was kept pristine for closeups.)

    So to all those like FPP who claimed they weren't about sanitizing history >> and
    that such things like the Confederate flag are fine if confined to a
    museums,
    here's an example of how even museums are pressured to (and cave to)
    political
    correctness.

    I'm surprised that even in re-runs of the show itself, they haven't CGI-d- >> the
    flag off the car's roof (or even worse, replaced it with a rainbow flag).

    They did:

    <https://southinpopculture.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/11403081_10204903151883828_3598410428185521451_n1.jpg>


    ;-)

    Dear sweet jeebus, no!

    There are also people who complain about countries like New Zealand and >>> Australia having the Union Jack in the corner of their flag, and trying >>> to get the flags changed (at one point wasting huge amounts of
    tax-payer money on a stupid referendum vote in New Zealand, which
    resulted unsurprisingly in NOT changing the flag, but still fools keep
    trying to push for a change). Then of course there is the complete
    opposite, where the Hawaiian flag has a Union Jack in the corner
    depsite now being part of the United States.

    A couple of years ago Minnesota decided to change its state flag for the
    first
    time since it was admitted as a state.

    Here's the old flag:

    https://ibb.co/bjPhytNB

    Here's the new flag:

    https://ibb.co/nNtkJCwg

    A lot of people have remarked how similar the new flag is to the flag of
    Somalia:

    https://ibb.co/k2jVGLZ7

    ...and how coincidental that is considering how large the Somali immigrant >> population is in Minnesota and how Ilhan Omar (the congressional
    representative for Somalia) is nominally from Minnesota.

    They've had competitions here to design a new New Zealand flag, usually
    the same old rubbish of a silver fern, a kiwi (the bird, no the
    kiwifruit), or various versions of a koru (a Maori sylished version of
    a curled fern frond).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From moviePig@21:1/5 to Rhino on Sun Jul 20 11:08:39 2025
    On 7/19/2025 6:16 PM, Rhino wrote:
    On 2025-07-19 12:27 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 7/19/2025 2:39 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 18, 2025 at 8:42:18 PM PDT, "Your Name" <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    On 2025-07-18 09:36:03 +0000, The Horny Goat said:
      On Thu, 17 Jul 2025 12:08:45 -0400, Rhino
      <[email protected]> wrote:
      Her entire school had a Cultural Diversity Day and all
    students were
      told to wear something celebrating her own culture instead >>>>>>>>>> of the usual
      school uniforms so she wore a dress that was essentially a >>>>>>>>>> British
      flag. She was an A student but found herself punished for >>>>>>>>>> her choice of
      clothing - along with other students - and her parents were >>>>>>>>>> called to
      pick her up early.
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PE2jV5qxE4g [8 minutes] >>>>>>>>>>   Her parents were not at all happy and her community was very >>>>>>>>>> agitated
      as well. The school gave an after-the-fact "apology" where they >>>>>>>>>>   promised to reconsider how the event was run the next year. >>>>>>>>>> I'll
      believe that when I see it!
      And if the school had said "you can't wear a flag that way!" you
      wouldn't have heard that story - but they didn't and claimed it was >>>>>   anti-everybody NOT born in the UK - and that DID make it a news
    story.
      I saw the picture of her and thought she wore it quite well - and >>>>>   wasn't at all making it a parody (or a slur against those not
    British
      born) as some have claimed.

    Not really a problem of being a slur or a parody, but simply that flags >>>> themselves are seen by a small number of Politically Correct nutters as >>>> having bad symbolism.

    For the UK's flag, they stupidly see a sign of the oppression native
    people in various countries that the British Empire controlled
    centuries ago. Similarly, in America the Confederate flag is stupidly
    seen by small number of loud-mouthed nutters as being a symbol of
    slavery, so forcing it to be removed from various places, including
    replicas of the "Dukes of Hazard" General Lee car (no doubt they also
    whined on about the naming of that car).

    They not only removed it from replicas of the General Lee, they
    removed it
    from the *actual* General Lee.

    If you take the VIP studio tour at Warner Bros., one of the stops is
    a display
    of various picture cars used in movies and TV shows over the years--
    everything from the many incarnations of the Batmobile, to the Scooby
    Doo
    Mystery Machine and Austin Powers' Mini Cooper. They also have one of
    the
    original DUKES OF HAZZARD General Lees on display,** but with no
    Confederate
    flag on the roof, which prompted another guy on the tour to doubt its
    authenticity. The tour guide told us that he'd been officially
    instructed to
    tell people that it was never actually there (even though you can
    still see
    hints of it beneath the orange paint) but that the real reason is
    that studio
    bowed to political correctness when some guests claimed to be
    offended by it
    and decided to rewrite that bit of TV history.

    (**There were actually dozens of General Lees used in the show, most
    of which
    were destroyed in the various stunts. The one in the museum is the
    'hero' car
    that was kept pristine for closeups.)

    So to all those like FPP who claimed they weren't about sanitizing
    history and
    that such things like the Confederate flag are fine if confined to a
    museums,
    here's an example of how even museums are pressured to (and cave to)
    political
    correctness.

    I'm surprised that even in re-runs of the show itself, they haven't
    CGI-d- the
    flag off the car's roof (or even worse, replaced it with a rainbow
    flag).

    There are also people who complain about countries like New Zealand and >>>> Australia having the Union Jack in the corner of their flag, and trying >>>> to get the flags changed (at one point wasting huge amounts of
    tax-payer money on a stupid referendum vote in New Zealand, which
    resulted unsurprisingly in NOT changing the flag, but still fools keep >>>> trying to push for a change). Then of course there is the complete
    opposite, where the Hawaiian flag has a Union Jack in the corner
    depsite now being part of the United States.

    A couple of years ago Minnesota decided to change its state flag for
    the first
    time since it was admitted as a state.

    Here's the old flag:

    https://ibb.co/bjPhytNB

    Here's the new flag:

    https://ibb.co/nNtkJCwg

    A lot of people have remarked how similar the new flag is to the flag of >>> Somalia:

    https://ibb.co/k2jVGLZ7

    ...and how coincidental that is considering how large the Somali
    immigrant
    population is in Minnesota and how Ilhan Omar (the congressional
    representative for Somalia) is nominally from Minnesota.

    Today, the closest verbalization of flag-flying is: "Proud To Be
    A...", where the thing one's proud to be was neither earned nor even
    avoidable.


    Once again, you interject an observation that is not on topic or even comprehensible to normal people. I don't know where you come up with
    these. I can only assume this is some bizarre way of proving how wise
    and worldly you think you are.

    Example: Someone who's "proud to be an American" likely had little
    choice in the matter and thus has little basis for pride.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From moviePig@21:1/5 to Rhino on Sun Jul 20 11:19:53 2025
    On 7/19/2025 6:23 PM, Rhino wrote:
    On 2025-07-18 4:42 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 7/17/2025 1:13 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 16, 2025 at 3:33:02 PM PDT, "Rhino"
    <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    Her entire school had a Cultural Diversity Day and all students were
    told to wear something celebrating her own culture instead of the usual >>>> school uniforms so she wore a dress that was essentially a British
    flag.
    She was an A student but found herself punished for her choice of
    clothing - along with other students - and her parents were called to
    pick her up early.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PE2jV5qxE4g [8 minutes]

    Her parents were not at all happy and her community was very
    agitated as
    well. The school gave an after-the-fact "apology" where they
    promised to
    reconsider how the event was run the next year. I'll believe that
    when I
    see it!

    Oh, I'm sure they are truly reconsidering how the event will be run
    in the
    future. This time around, the flyer with the instructions for the
    event said
    to come dressed in a manner expressing your nationality or family
    heritage,
    and didn't exclude white native-born British nationality and heritage.

    After reconsideration, I'm sure they'll conclude that where they went
    wrong
    was not making it clear from the start that the event doesn't include
    white
    people and/or British history or culture. Next year's flyer will be
    sure to
    make that explicit, with instructions to the white kids to just wear
    their
    normal school uniforms while everyone else dresses up.

    Or... they could say that, since everyone at the school is daily
    surrounded by British culture, the event is meant to showcase a
    variety of others.

    So, every culture is to be celebrated EXCEPT that of the host country
    which welcomed all the others to their country.

    The issue was "where they went wrong". I proposed a reframing that's
    less obdurately jingoist than BTR's strawman.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BTR1701@21:1/5 to moviePig on Sun Jul 20 17:37:21 2025
    On Jul 20, 2025 at 8:08:39 AM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 7/19/2025 6:16 PM, Rhino wrote:
    On 2025-07-19 12:27 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 7/19/2025 2:39 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 18, 2025 at 8:42:18 PM PDT, "Your Name" <[email protected]> >>>> wrote:

    On 2025-07-18 09:36:03 +0000, The Horny Goat said:
      On Thu, 17 Jul 2025 12:08:45 -0400, Rhino
      <[email protected]> wrote:
      Her entire school had a Cultural Diversity Day and all >>>>>>>>>>> students were
      told to wear something celebrating her own culture instead >>>>>>>>>>> of the usual
      school uniforms so she wore a dress that was essentially a >>>>>>>>>>> British
      flag. She was an A student but found herself punished for >>>>>>>>>>> her choice of
      clothing - along with other students - and her parents were >>>>>>>>>>> called to
      pick her up early.
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PE2jV5qxE4g [8 minutes] >>>>>>>>>>>   Her parents were not at all happy and her community was very >>>>>>>>>>> agitated
      as well. The school gave an after-the-fact "apology" where they >>>>>>>>>>>   promised to reconsider how the event was run the next year. >>>>>>>>>>> I'll
      believe that when I see it!
      And if the school had said "you can't wear a flag that way!" you >>>>>>   wouldn't have heard that story - but they didn't and claimed it was >>>>>>   anti-everybody NOT born in the UK - and that DID make it a news >>>>>> story.
      I saw the picture of her and thought she wore it quite well - and >>>>>>   wasn't at all making it a parody (or a slur against those not
    British
      born) as some have claimed.

    Not really a problem of being a slur or a parody, but simply that flags >>>>> themselves are seen by a small number of Politically Correct nutters as >>>>> having bad symbolism.

    For the UK's flag, they stupidly see a sign of the oppression native >>>>> people in various countries that the British Empire controlled
    centuries ago. Similarly, in America the Confederate flag is stupidly >>>>> seen by small number of loud-mouthed nutters as being a symbol of
    slavery, so forcing it to be removed from various places, including >>>>> replicas of the "Dukes of Hazard" General Lee car (no doubt they also >>>>> whined on about the naming of that car).

    They not only removed it from replicas of the General Lee, they
    removed it
    from the *actual* General Lee.

    If you take the VIP studio tour at Warner Bros., one of the stops is
    a display
    of various picture cars used in movies and TV shows over the years--
    everything from the many incarnations of the Batmobile, to the Scooby >>>> Doo
    Mystery Machine and Austin Powers' Mini Cooper. They also have one of >>>> the
    original DUKES OF HAZZARD General Lees on display,** but with no
    Confederate
    flag on the roof, which prompted another guy on the tour to doubt its >>>> authenticity. The tour guide told us that he'd been officially
    instructed to
    tell people that it was never actually there (even though you can
    still see
    hints of it beneath the orange paint) but that the real reason is
    that studio
    bowed to political correctness when some guests claimed to be
    offended by it
    and decided to rewrite that bit of TV history.

    (**There were actually dozens of General Lees used in the show, most
    of which
    were destroyed in the various stunts. The one in the museum is the
    'hero' car
    that was kept pristine for closeups.)

    So to all those like FPP who claimed they weren't about sanitizing
    history and
    that such things like the Confederate flag are fine if confined to a
    museums,
    here's an example of how even museums are pressured to (and cave to)
    political
    correctness.

    I'm surprised that even in re-runs of the show itself, they haven't
    CGI-d- the
    flag off the car's roof (or even worse, replaced it with a rainbow
    flag).

    There are also people who complain about countries like New Zealand and >>>>> Australia having the Union Jack in the corner of their flag, and trying >>>>> to get the flags changed (at one point wasting huge amounts of
    tax-payer money on a stupid referendum vote in New Zealand, which
    resulted unsurprisingly in NOT changing the flag, but still fools keep >>>>> trying to push for a change). Then of course there is the complete
    opposite, where the Hawaiian flag has a Union Jack in the corner
    depsite now being part of the United States.

    A couple of years ago Minnesota decided to change its state flag for
    the first
    time since it was admitted as a state.

    Here's the old flag:

    https://ibb.co/bjPhytNB

    Here's the new flag:

    https://ibb.co/nNtkJCwg

    A lot of people have remarked how similar the new flag is to the flag of >>>> Somalia:

    https://ibb.co/k2jVGLZ7

    ...and how coincidental that is considering how large the Somali
    immigrant
    population is in Minnesota and how Ilhan Omar (the congressional
    representative for Somalia) is nominally from Minnesota.

    Today, the closest verbalization of flag-flying is: "Proud To Be
    A...", where the thing one's proud to be was neither earned nor even
    avoidable.


    Once again, you interject an observation that is not on topic or even
    comprehensible to normal people. I don't know where you come up with
    these. I can only assume this is some bizarre way of proving how wise
    and worldly you think you are.

    Example: Someone who's "proud to be an American" likely had little
    choice in the matter and thus has little basis for pride.

    Of course they have a choice. No one's stopping anyone from leaving and renouncing their citizenship.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From moviePig@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jul 20 14:20:16 2025
    On 7/20/2025 1:37 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 20, 2025 at 8:08:39 AM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 7/19/2025 6:16 PM, Rhino wrote:
    On 2025-07-19 12:27 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 7/19/2025 2:39 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 18, 2025 at 8:42:18 PM PDT, "Your Name" <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote:

    On 2025-07-18 09:36:03 +0000, The Horny Goat said:
      On Thu, 17 Jul 2025 12:08:45 -0400, Rhino
      <[email protected]> wrote:
      Her entire school had a Cultural Diversity Day and all >>>>>>>>>>>> students were
      told to wear something celebrating her own culture instead >>>>>>>>>>>> of the usual
      school uniforms so she wore a dress that was essentially a >>>>>>>>>>>> British
      flag. She was an A student but found herself punished for >>>>>>>>>>>> her choice of
      clothing - along with other students - and her parents were >>>>>>>>>>>> called to
      pick her up early.
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PE2jV5qxE4g [8 minutes] >>>>>>>>>>>>   Her parents were not at all happy and her community was very >>>>>>>>>>>> agitated
      as well. The school gave an after-the-fact "apology" where they
      promised to reconsider how the event was run the next year. >>>>>>>>>>>> I'll
      believe that when I see it!
      And if the school had said "you can't wear a flag that way!" you >>>>>>>   wouldn't have heard that story - but they didn't and claimed it was
      anti-everybody NOT born in the UK - and that DID make it a news >>>>>>> story.
      I saw the picture of her and thought she wore it quite well - and >>>>>>>   wasn't at all making it a parody (or a slur against those not >>>>>>> British
      born) as some have claimed.

    Not really a problem of being a slur or a parody, but simply that flags
    themselves are seen by a small number of Politically Correct nutters as
    having bad symbolism.

    For the UK's flag, they stupidly see a sign of the oppression native >>>>>> people in various countries that the British Empire controlled
    centuries ago. Similarly, in America the Confederate flag is stupidly >>>>>> seen by small number of loud-mouthed nutters as being a symbol of >>>>>> slavery, so forcing it to be removed from various places, including >>>>>> replicas of the "Dukes of Hazard" General Lee car (no doubt they also >>>>>> whined on about the naming of that car).

    They not only removed it from replicas of the General Lee, they
    removed it
    from the *actual* General Lee.

    If you take the VIP studio tour at Warner Bros., one of the stops is >>>>> a display
    of various picture cars used in movies and TV shows over the years-- >>>>> everything from the many incarnations of the Batmobile, to the Scooby >>>>> Doo
    Mystery Machine and Austin Powers' Mini Cooper. They also have one of >>>>> the
    original DUKES OF HAZZARD General Lees on display,** but with no
    Confederate
    flag on the roof, which prompted another guy on the tour to doubt its >>>>> authenticity. The tour guide told us that he'd been officially
    instructed to
    tell people that it was never actually there (even though you can
    still see
    hints of it beneath the orange paint) but that the real reason is
    that studio
    bowed to political correctness when some guests claimed to be
    offended by it
    and decided to rewrite that bit of TV history.

    (**There were actually dozens of General Lees used in the show, most >>>>> of which
    were destroyed in the various stunts. The one in the museum is the >>>>> 'hero' car
    that was kept pristine for closeups.)

    So to all those like FPP who claimed they weren't about sanitizing >>>>> history and
    that such things like the Confederate flag are fine if confined to a >>>>> museums,
    here's an example of how even museums are pressured to (and cave to) >>>>> political
    correctness.

    I'm surprised that even in re-runs of the show itself, they haven't >>>>> CGI-d- the
    flag off the car's roof (or even worse, replaced it with a rainbow >>>>> flag).

    There are also people who complain about countries like New Zealand and
    Australia having the Union Jack in the corner of their flag, and trying
    to get the flags changed (at one point wasting huge amounts of
    tax-payer money on a stupid referendum vote in New Zealand, which >>>>>> resulted unsurprisingly in NOT changing the flag, but still fools keep >>>>>> trying to push for a change). Then of course there is the complete >>>>>> opposite, where the Hawaiian flag has a Union Jack in the corner >>>>>> depsite now being part of the United States.

    A couple of years ago Minnesota decided to change its state flag for >>>>> the first
    time since it was admitted as a state.

    Here's the old flag:

    https://ibb.co/bjPhytNB

    Here's the new flag:

    https://ibb.co/nNtkJCwg

    A lot of people have remarked how similar the new flag is to the flag of
    Somalia:

    https://ibb.co/k2jVGLZ7

    ...and how coincidental that is considering how large the Somali
    immigrant
    population is in Minnesota and how Ilhan Omar (the congressional
    representative for Somalia) is nominally from Minnesota.

    Today, the closest verbalization of flag-flying is: "Proud To Be
    A...", where the thing one's proud to be was neither earned nor even >>>> avoidable.


    Once again, you interject an observation that is not on topic or even
    comprehensible to normal people. I don't know where you come up with
    these. I can only assume this is some bizarre way of proving how wise
    and worldly you think you are.

    Example: Someone who's "proud to be an American" likely had little
    choice in the matter and thus has little basis for pride.

    Of course they have a choice. No one's stopping anyone from leaving and renouncing their citizenship.

    "...had..."




    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BTR1701@21:1/5 to moviePig on Sun Jul 20 18:21:55 2025
    On Jul 20, 2025 at 11:20:16 AM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 7/20/2025 1:37 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 20, 2025 at 8:08:39 AM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote: >>
    On 7/19/2025 6:16 PM, Rhino wrote:
    On 2025-07-19 12:27 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 7/19/2025 2:39 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 18, 2025 at 8:42:18 PM PDT, "Your Name" <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote:

    On 2025-07-18 09:36:03 +0000, The Horny Goat said:
      On Thu, 17 Jul 2025 12:08:45 -0400, Rhino
      <[email protected]> wrote:
      Her entire school had a Cultural Diversity Day and all >>>>>>>>>>>>> students were
      told to wear something celebrating her own culture instead >>>>>>>>>>>>> of the usual
      school uniforms so she wore a dress that was essentially a >>>>>>>>>>>>> British
      flag. She was an A student but found herself punished for >>>>>>>>>>>>> her choice of
      clothing - along with other students - and her parents were >>>>>>>>>>>>> called to
      pick her up early.
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PE2jV5qxE4g [8 minutes] >>>>>>>>>>>>>   Her parents were not at all happy and her community was very
    agitated
      as well. The school gave an after-the-fact "apology" where they
      promised to reconsider how the event was run the next year. >>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll
      believe that when I see it!
      And if the school had said "you can't wear a flag that way!" you >>>>>>>>   wouldn't have heard that story - but they didn't and claimed it was
      anti-everybody NOT born in the UK - and that DID make it a news >>>>>>>> story.
      I saw the picture of her and thought she wore it quite well - and
      wasn't at all making it a parody (or a slur against those not >>>>>>>> British
      born) as some have claimed.

    Not really a problem of being a slur or a parody, but simply that flags
    themselves are seen by a small number of Politically Correct nutters as
    having bad symbolism.

    For the UK's flag, they stupidly see a sign of the oppression native >>>>>>> people in various countries that the British Empire controlled >>>>>>> centuries ago. Similarly, in America the Confederate flag is stupidly
    seen by small number of loud-mouthed nutters as being a symbol of >>>>>>> slavery, so forcing it to be removed from various places, including >>>>>>> replicas of the "Dukes of Hazard" General Lee car (no doubt they also
    whined on about the naming of that car).

    They not only removed it from replicas of the General Lee, they >>>>>> removed it
    from the *actual* General Lee.

    If you take the VIP studio tour at Warner Bros., one of the stops is >>>>>> a display
    of various picture cars used in movies and TV shows over the years-- >>>>>> everything from the many incarnations of the Batmobile, to the Scooby >>>>>> Doo
    Mystery Machine and Austin Powers' Mini Cooper. They also have one of >>>>>> the
    original DUKES OF HAZZARD General Lees on display,** but with no >>>>>> Confederate
    flag on the roof, which prompted another guy on the tour to doubt its >>>>>> authenticity. The tour guide told us that he'd been officially
    instructed to
    tell people that it was never actually there (even though you can >>>>>> still see
    hints of it beneath the orange paint) but that the real reason is >>>>>> that studio
    bowed to political correctness when some guests claimed to be
    offended by it
    and decided to rewrite that bit of TV history.

    (**There were actually dozens of General Lees used in the show, most >>>>>> of which
    were destroyed in the various stunts. The one in the museum is the >>>>>> 'hero' car
    that was kept pristine for closeups.)

    So to all those like FPP who claimed they weren't about sanitizing >>>>>> history and
    that such things like the Confederate flag are fine if confined to a >>>>>> museums,
    here's an example of how even museums are pressured to (and cave to) >>>>>> political
    correctness.

    I'm surprised that even in re-runs of the show itself, they haven't >>>>>> CGI-d- the
    flag off the car's roof (or even worse, replaced it with a rainbow >>>>>> flag).

    There are also people who complain about countries like New Zealand and
    Australia having the Union Jack in the corner of their flag, and trying
    to get the flags changed (at one point wasting huge amounts of >>>>>>> tax-payer money on a stupid referendum vote in New Zealand, which >>>>>>> resulted unsurprisingly in NOT changing the flag, but still fools keep
    trying to push for a change). Then of course there is the complete >>>>>>> opposite, where the Hawaiian flag has a Union Jack in the corner >>>>>>> depsite now being part of the United States.

    A couple of years ago Minnesota decided to change its state flag for >>>>>> the first
    time since it was admitted as a state.

    Here's the old flag:

    https://ibb.co/bjPhytNB

    Here's the new flag:

    https://ibb.co/nNtkJCwg

    A lot of people have remarked how similar the new flag is to the flag of
    Somalia:

    https://ibb.co/k2jVGLZ7

    ...and how coincidental that is considering how large the Somali >>>>>> immigrant
    population is in Minnesota and how Ilhan Omar (the congressional >>>>>> representative for Somalia) is nominally from Minnesota.

    Today, the closest verbalization of flag-flying is: "Proud To Be
    A...", where the thing one's proud to be was neither earned nor even >>>>> avoidable.


    Once again, you interject an observation that is not on topic or even >>>> comprehensible to normal people. I don't know where you come up with >>>> these. I can only assume this is some bizarre way of proving how wise >>>> and worldly you think you are.

    Example: Someone who's "proud to be an American" likely had little
    choice in the matter and thus has little basis for pride.

    Of course they have a choice. No one's stopping anyone from leaving and
    renouncing their citizenship.

    "...had..."

    No one was stopping anyone from leaving and renouncing their citizenship in
    the past, either.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Adam H. Kerman@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Sun Jul 20 18:31:20 2025
    BTR1701 <[email protected]> wrote:
    Jul 20, 2025 at 8:08:39 AM PDT, moviePig <[email protected]> wrote:

    . . .

    Example: Someone who's "proud to be an American" likely had little
    choice in the matter and thus has little basis for pride.

    Of course they have a choice. No one's stopping anyone from leaving and >renouncing their citizenship.

    moviePig should be living with his Russian counterpart who is proud of
    his country for having invaded and started a war with Ukraine. Of
    course, he has no Russian counterpart. There's no free media. The war
    isn't being discussed publicly and the vast majority of Russians are
    unaware of its full extent.

    Having pride does not flow from having been born somewhere.

    I wonder why so many people emigrate from their homelands to immigrate
    here. Perhaps they aren't so proud of the places they were born.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From moviePig@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jul 20 16:03:36 2025
    On 7/20/2025 2:21 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 20, 2025 at 11:20:16 AM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 7/20/2025 1:37 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 20, 2025 at 8:08:39 AM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>
    On 7/19/2025 6:16 PM, Rhino wrote:
    On 2025-07-19 12:27 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 7/19/2025 2:39 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 18, 2025 at 8:42:18 PM PDT, "Your Name" <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    On 2025-07-18 09:36:03 +0000, The Horny Goat said:
      On Thu, 17 Jul 2025 12:08:45 -0400, Rhino
      <[email protected]> wrote:
      Her entire school had a Cultural Diversity Day and all >>>>>>>>>>>>>> students were
      told to wear something celebrating her own culture instead
    of the usual
      school uniforms so she wore a dress that was essentially a
    British
      flag. She was an A student but found herself punished for >>>>>>>>>>>>>> her choice of
      clothing - along with other students - and her parents were
    called to
      pick her up early.
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PE2jV5qxE4g [8 minutes] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   Her parents were not at all happy and her community was very
    agitated
      as well. The school gave an after-the-fact "apology" where they
      promised to reconsider how the event was run the next year.
    I'll
      believe that when I see it!
      And if the school had said "you can't wear a flag that way!" you
      wouldn't have heard that story - but they didn't and claimed it was
      anti-everybody NOT born in the UK - and that DID make it a news
    story.
      I saw the picture of her and thought she wore it quite well - and
      wasn't at all making it a parody (or a slur against those not >>>>>>>>> British
      born) as some have claimed.

    Not really a problem of being a slur or a parody, but simply that flags
    themselves are seen by a small number of Politically Correct nutters as
    having bad symbolism.

    For the UK's flag, they stupidly see a sign of the oppression native
    people in various countries that the British Empire controlled >>>>>>>> centuries ago. Similarly, in America the Confederate flag is stupidly
    seen by small number of loud-mouthed nutters as being a symbol of >>>>>>>> slavery, so forcing it to be removed from various places, including
    replicas of the "Dukes of Hazard" General Lee car (no doubt they also
    whined on about the naming of that car).

    They not only removed it from replicas of the General Lee, they >>>>>>> removed it
    from the *actual* General Lee.

    If you take the VIP studio tour at Warner Bros., one of the stops is
    a display
    of various picture cars used in movies and TV shows over the years--
    everything from the many incarnations of the Batmobile, to the Scooby
    Doo
    Mystery Machine and Austin Powers' Mini Cooper. They also have one of
    the
    original DUKES OF HAZZARD General Lees on display,** but with no >>>>>>> Confederate
    flag on the roof, which prompted another guy on the tour to doubt its
    authenticity. The tour guide told us that he'd been officially >>>>>>> instructed to
    tell people that it was never actually there (even though you can >>>>>>> still see
    hints of it beneath the orange paint) but that the real reason is >>>>>>> that studio
    bowed to political correctness when some guests claimed to be >>>>>>> offended by it
    and decided to rewrite that bit of TV history.

    (**There were actually dozens of General Lees used in the show, most
    of which
    were destroyed in the various stunts. The one in the museum is the >>>>>>> 'hero' car
    that was kept pristine for closeups.)

    So to all those like FPP who claimed they weren't about sanitizing >>>>>>> history and
    that such things like the Confederate flag are fine if confined to a
    museums,
    here's an example of how even museums are pressured to (and cave to)
    political
    correctness.

    I'm surprised that even in re-runs of the show itself, they haven't >>>>>>> CGI-d- the
    flag off the car's roof (or even worse, replaced it with a rainbow >>>>>>> flag).

    There are also people who complain about countries like New Zealand and
    Australia having the Union Jack in the corner of their flag, and trying
    to get the flags changed (at one point wasting huge amounts of >>>>>>>> tax-payer money on a stupid referendum vote in New Zealand, which >>>>>>>> resulted unsurprisingly in NOT changing the flag, but still fools keep
    trying to push for a change). Then of course there is the complete >>>>>>>> opposite, where the Hawaiian flag has a Union Jack in the corner >>>>>>>> depsite now being part of the United States.

    A couple of years ago Minnesota decided to change its state flag for
    the first
    time since it was admitted as a state.

    Here's the old flag:

    https://ibb.co/bjPhytNB

    Here's the new flag:

    https://ibb.co/nNtkJCwg

    A lot of people have remarked how similar the new flag is to the flag of
    Somalia:

    https://ibb.co/k2jVGLZ7

    ...and how coincidental that is considering how large the Somali >>>>>>> immigrant
    population is in Minnesota and how Ilhan Omar (the congressional >>>>>>> representative for Somalia) is nominally from Minnesota.

    Today, the closest verbalization of flag-flying is: "Proud To Be >>>>>> A...", where the thing one's proud to be was neither earned nor even >>>>>> avoidable.


    Once again, you interject an observation that is not on topic or even >>>>> comprehensible to normal people. I don't know where you come up with >>>>> these. I can only assume this is some bizarre way of proving how wise >>>>> and worldly you think you are.

    Example: Someone who's "proud to be an American" likely had little
    choice in the matter and thus has little basis for pride.

    Of course they have a choice. No one's stopping anyone from leaving and >>> renouncing their citizenship.

    "...had..."

    No one was stopping anyone from leaving and renouncing their citizenship in the past, either.

    Says little about pride. Most live in the state where they were born.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BTR1701@21:1/5 to moviePig on Sun Jul 20 20:22:02 2025
    moviePig <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 7/20/2025 2:21 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 20, 2025 at 11:20:16 AM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote: >>
    On 7/20/2025 1:37 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 20, 2025 at 8:08:39 AM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>
    On 7/19/2025 6:16 PM, Rhino wrote:
    On 2025-07-19 12:27 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 7/19/2025 2:39 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 18, 2025 at 8:42:18 PM PDT, "Your Name" <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> wrote:

    On 2025-07-18 09:36:03 +0000, The Horny Goat said:
    � On Thu, 17 Jul 2025 12:08:45 -0400, Rhino
    � <[email protected]> wrote:
    � Her entire school had a Cultural Diversity Day and all >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> students were
    � told to wear something celebrating her own culture instead >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the usual
    � school uniforms so she wore a dress that was essentially a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> British
    � flag. She was an A student but found herself punished for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> her choice of
    � clothing - along with other students - and her parents were >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> called to
    � pick her up early.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PE2jV5qxE4g [8 minutes] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> � Her parents were not at all happy and her community was very >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agitated
    � as well. The school gave an after-the-fact "apology" where they
    � promised to reconsider how the event was run the next year. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll
    � believe that when I see it!
    � And if the school had said "you can't wear a flag that way!" you >>>>>>>>>> � wouldn't have heard that story - but they didn't and claimed it was
    � anti-everybody NOT born in the UK - and that DID make it a news >>>>>>>>>> story.
    � I saw the picture of her and thought she wore it quite well - and >>>>>>>>>> � wasn't at all making it a parody (or a slur against those not >>>>>>>>>> British
    � born) as some have claimed.

    Not really a problem of being a slur or a parody, but simply that flags
    themselves are seen by a small number of Politically Correct nutters as
    having bad symbolism.

    For the UK's flag, they stupidly see a sign of the oppression native >>>>>>>>> people in various countries that the British Empire controlled >>>>>>>>> centuries ago. Similarly, in America the Confederate flag is stupidly >>>>>>>>> seen by small number of loud-mouthed nutters as being a symbol of >>>>>>>>> slavery, so forcing it to be removed from various places, including >>>>>>>>> replicas of the "Dukes of Hazard" General Lee car (no doubt they also >>>>>>>>> whined on about the naming of that car).

    They not only removed it from replicas of the General Lee, they >>>>>>>> removed it
    from the *actual* General Lee.

    If you take the VIP studio tour at Warner Bros., one of the stops is >>>>>>>> a display
    of various picture cars used in movies and TV shows over the years-- >>>>>>>> everything from the many incarnations of the Batmobile, to the Scooby >>>>>>>> Doo
    Mystery Machine and Austin Powers' Mini Cooper. They also have one of >>>>>>>> the
    original DUKES OF HAZZARD General Lees on display,** but with no >>>>>>>> Confederate
    flag on the roof, which prompted another guy on the tour to doubt its >>>>>>>> authenticity. The tour guide told us that he'd been officially >>>>>>>> instructed to
    tell people that it was never actually there (even though you can >>>>>>>> still see
    hints of it beneath the orange paint) but that the real reason is >>>>>>>> that studio
    bowed to political correctness when some guests claimed to be
    offended by it
    and decided to rewrite that bit of TV history.

    (**There were actually dozens of General Lees used in the show, most >>>>>>>> of which
    were destroyed in the various stunts. The one in the museum is the >>>>>>>> 'hero' car
    that was kept pristine for closeups.)

    So to all those like FPP who claimed they weren't about sanitizing >>>>>>>> history and
    that such things like the Confederate flag are fine if confined to a >>>>>>>> museums,
    here's an example of how even museums are pressured to (and cave to) >>>>>>>> political
    correctness.

    I'm surprised that even in re-runs of the show itself, they haven't >>>>>>>> CGI-d- the
    flag off the car's roof (or even worse, replaced it with a rainbow >>>>>>>> flag).

    There are also people who complain about countries like New Zealand and
    Australia having the Union Jack in the corner of their flag, and trying
    to get the flags changed (at one point wasting huge amounts of >>>>>>>>> tax-payer money on a stupid referendum vote in New Zealand, which >>>>>>>>> resulted unsurprisingly in NOT changing the flag, but still fools keep
    trying to push for a change). Then of course there is the complete >>>>>>>>> opposite, where the Hawaiian flag has a Union Jack in the corner >>>>>>>>> depsite now being part of the United States.

    A couple of years ago Minnesota decided to change its state flag for >>>>>>>> the first
    time since it was admitted as a state.

    Here's the old flag:

    https://ibb.co/bjPhytNB

    Here's the new flag:

    https://ibb.co/nNtkJCwg

    A lot of people have remarked how similar the new flag is to the flag of
    Somalia:

    https://ibb.co/k2jVGLZ7

    ...and how coincidental that is considering how large the Somali >>>>>>>> immigrant
    population is in Minnesota and how Ilhan Omar (the congressional >>>>>>>> representative for Somalia) is nominally from Minnesota.

    Today, the closest verbalization of flag-flying is: "Proud To Be >>>>>>> A...", where the thing one's proud to be was neither earned nor even >>>>>>> avoidable.


    Once again, you interject an observation that is not on topic or even >>>>>> comprehensible to normal people. I don't know where you come up with >>>>>> these. I can only assume this is some bizarre way of proving how wise >>>>>> and worldly you think you are.

    Example: Someone who's "proud to be an American" likely had little
    choice in the matter and thus has little basis for pride.

    Of course they have a choice. No one's stopping anyone from leaving and >>>> renouncing their citizenship.

    "...had..."

    No one was stopping anyone from leaving and renouncing their citizenship in >> the past, either.

    Says little about pride. Most live in the state where they were born.

    That doesn't mean they have no choice in the matter.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From moviePig@21:1/5 to Adam H. Kerman on Sun Jul 20 16:20:20 2025
    On 7/20/2025 2:31 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
    BTR1701 <[email protected]> wrote:
    Jul 20, 2025 at 8:08:39 AM PDT, moviePig <[email protected]> wrote:

    . . .

    Example: Someone who's "proud to be an American" likely had little
    choice in the matter and thus has little basis for pride.

    Of course they have a choice. No one's stopping anyone from leaving and
    renouncing their citizenship.

    moviePig should be living with his Russian counterpart who is proud of
    his country for having invaded and started a war with Ukraine. Of
    course, he has no Russian counterpart. There's no free media. The war
    isn't being discussed publicly and the vast majority of Russians are
    unaware of its full extent.

    Having pride does not flow from having been born somewhere.

    Not does it flow from having conveniently remained there.

    > I wonder why so many people emigrate from their homelands to immigrate
    here. Perhaps they aren't so proud of the places they were born.
    Perhaps they haven't the luxury of affectations such as empty pride.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BTR1701@21:1/5 to moviePig on Sun Jul 20 21:08:45 2025
    On Jul 20, 2025 at 1:54:01 PM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 7/20/2025 4:22 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    moviePig <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 7/20/2025 2:21 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 20, 2025 at 11:20:16 AM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 7/20/2025 1:37 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 20, 2025 at 8:08:39 AM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 7/19/2025 6:16 PM, Rhino wrote:


    Once again, you interject an observation that is not on topic or even >>>>>>>> comprehensible to normal people. I don't know where you come up with >>>>>>>> these. I can only assume this is some bizarre way of proving how wise >>>>>>>> and worldly you think you are.

    Example: Someone who's "proud to be an American" likely had little >>>>>>> choice in the matter and thus has little basis for pride.

    Of course they have a choice. No one's stopping anyone from leaving and >>>>>> renouncing their citizenship.

    "...had..."

    No one was stopping anyone from leaving and renouncing their citizenship in
    the past, either.

    Says little about pride. Most live in the state where they were born.

    That doesn't mean they have no choice in the matter.

    True, if I tell you at gunpoint to eat wasps, you still have a choice...

    Yes, because people are being held at gunpoint and prevented from leaving
    their state of birth.

    Great analogy!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From moviePig@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jul 20 16:54:01 2025
    On 7/20/2025 4:22 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    moviePig <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 7/20/2025 2:21 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 20, 2025 at 11:20:16 AM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>
    On 7/20/2025 1:37 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 20, 2025 at 8:08:39 AM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>
    On 7/19/2025 6:16 PM, Rhino wrote:
    On 2025-07-19 12:27 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 7/19/2025 2:39 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 18, 2025 at 8:42:18 PM PDT, "Your Name" <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>> wrote:

    On 2025-07-18 09:36:03 +0000, The Horny Goat said:
      On Thu, 17 Jul 2025 12:08:45 -0400, Rhino
      <[email protected]> wrote:
      Her entire school had a Cultural Diversity Day and all >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> students were
      told to wear something celebrating her own culture instead >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the usual
      school uniforms so she wore a dress that was essentially a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> British
      flag. She was an A student but found herself punished for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> her choice of
      clothing - along with other students - and her parents were
    called to
      pick her up early.
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PE2jV5qxE4g [8 minutes] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   Her parents were not at all happy and her community was very
    agitated
      as well. The school gave an after-the-fact "apology" where they
      promised to reconsider how the event was run the next year.
    I'll
      believe that when I see it!
      And if the school had said "you can't wear a flag that way!" you
      wouldn't have heard that story - but they didn't and claimed it was
      anti-everybody NOT born in the UK - and that DID make it a news >>>>>>>>>>> story.
      I saw the picture of her and thought she wore it quite well - and
      wasn't at all making it a parody (or a slur against those not >>>>>>>>>>> British
      born) as some have claimed.

    Not really a problem of being a slur or a parody, but simply that flags
    themselves are seen by a small number of Politically Correct nutters as
    having bad symbolism.

    For the UK's flag, they stupidly see a sign of the oppression native >>>>>>>>>> people in various countries that the British Empire controlled >>>>>>>>>> centuries ago. Similarly, in America the Confederate flag is stupidly
    seen by small number of loud-mouthed nutters as being a symbol of >>>>>>>>>> slavery, so forcing it to be removed from various places, including >>>>>>>>>> replicas of the "Dukes of Hazard" General Lee car (no doubt they also
    whined on about the naming of that car).

    They not only removed it from replicas of the General Lee, they >>>>>>>>> removed it
    from the *actual* General Lee.

    If you take the VIP studio tour at Warner Bros., one of the stops is >>>>>>>>> a display
    of various picture cars used in movies and TV shows over the years-- >>>>>>>>> everything from the many incarnations of the Batmobile, to the Scooby >>>>>>>>> Doo
    Mystery Machine and Austin Powers' Mini Cooper. They also have one of >>>>>>>>> the
    original DUKES OF HAZZARD General Lees on display,** but with no >>>>>>>>> Confederate
    flag on the roof, which prompted another guy on the tour to doubt its >>>>>>>>> authenticity. The tour guide told us that he'd been officially >>>>>>>>> instructed to
    tell people that it was never actually there (even though you can >>>>>>>>> still see
    hints of it beneath the orange paint) but that the real reason is >>>>>>>>> that studio
    bowed to political correctness when some guests claimed to be >>>>>>>>> offended by it
    and decided to rewrite that bit of TV history.

    (**There were actually dozens of General Lees used in the show, most >>>>>>>>> of which
    were destroyed in the various stunts. The one in the museum is the >>>>>>>>> 'hero' car
    that was kept pristine for closeups.)

    So to all those like FPP who claimed they weren't about sanitizing >>>>>>>>> history and
    that such things like the Confederate flag are fine if confined to a >>>>>>>>> museums,
    here's an example of how even museums are pressured to (and cave to) >>>>>>>>> political
    correctness.

    I'm surprised that even in re-runs of the show itself, they haven't >>>>>>>>> CGI-d- the
    flag off the car's roof (or even worse, replaced it with a rainbow >>>>>>>>> flag).

    There are also people who complain about countries like New Zealand and
    Australia having the Union Jack in the corner of their flag, and trying
    to get the flags changed (at one point wasting huge amounts of >>>>>>>>>> tax-payer money on a stupid referendum vote in New Zealand, which >>>>>>>>>> resulted unsurprisingly in NOT changing the flag, but still fools keep
    trying to push for a change). Then of course there is the complete >>>>>>>>>> opposite, where the Hawaiian flag has a Union Jack in the corner >>>>>>>>>> depsite now being part of the United States.

    A couple of years ago Minnesota decided to change its state flag for >>>>>>>>> the first
    time since it was admitted as a state.

    Here's the old flag:

    https://ibb.co/bjPhytNB

    Here's the new flag:

    https://ibb.co/nNtkJCwg

    A lot of people have remarked how similar the new flag is to the flag of
    Somalia:

    https://ibb.co/k2jVGLZ7

    ...and how coincidental that is considering how large the Somali >>>>>>>>> immigrant
    population is in Minnesota and how Ilhan Omar (the congressional >>>>>>>>> representative for Somalia) is nominally from Minnesota.

    Today, the closest verbalization of flag-flying is: "Proud To Be >>>>>>>> A...", where the thing one's proud to be was neither earned nor even >>>>>>>> avoidable.


    Once again, you interject an observation that is not on topic or even >>>>>>> comprehensible to normal people. I don't know where you come up with >>>>>>> these. I can only assume this is some bizarre way of proving how wise >>>>>>> and worldly you think you are.

    Example: Someone who's "proud to be an American" likely had little >>>>>> choice in the matter and thus has little basis for pride.

    Of course they have a choice. No one's stopping anyone from leaving and >>>>> renouncing their citizenship.

    "...had..."

    No one was stopping anyone from leaving and renouncing their citizenship in >>> the past, either.

    Says little about pride. Most live in the state where they were born.

    That doesn't mean they have no choice in the matter.

    True, if I tell you at gunpoint to eat wasps, you still have a choice...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From moviePig@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jul 21 11:54:31 2025
    On 7/20/2025 5:08 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 20, 2025 at 1:54:01 PM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 7/20/2025 4:22 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    moviePig <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 7/20/2025 2:21 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 20, 2025 at 11:20:16 AM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 7/20/2025 1:37 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 20, 2025 at 8:08:39 AM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 7/19/2025 6:16 PM, Rhino wrote:


    Once again, you interject an observation that is not on topic or even
    comprehensible to normal people. I don't know where you come up with
    these. I can only assume this is some bizarre way of proving how wise
    and worldly you think you are.

    Example: Someone who's "proud to be an American" likely had little >>>>>>>> choice in the matter and thus has little basis for pride.

    Of course they have a choice. No one's stopping anyone from leaving and
    renouncing their citizenship.

    "...had..."

    No one was stopping anyone from leaving and renouncing their citizenship in
    the past, either.

    Says little about pride. Most live in the state where they were born. >>>
    That doesn't mean they have no choice in the matter.

    True, if I tell you at gunpoint to eat wasps, you still have a choice...

    Yes, because people are being held at gunpoint and prevented from leaving their state of birth.

    Great analogy!

    If I'd intended an analogy, "gunpoint" would refer to the enormous inconvenience and stress surrounding a change of citizenship ...enough, incidentally, that overcoming it might be a source of pride.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BTR1701@21:1/5 to moviePig on Mon Jul 21 16:20:11 2025
    On Jul 21, 2025 at 8:54:31 AM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 7/20/2025 5:08 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 20, 2025 at 1:54:01 PM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote: >>
    On 7/20/2025 4:22 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    moviePig <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 7/20/2025 2:21 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 20, 2025 at 11:20:16 AM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 7/20/2025 1:37 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 20, 2025 at 8:08:39 AM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 7/19/2025 6:16 PM, Rhino wrote:


    Once again, you interject an observation that is not on topic or even
    comprehensible to normal people. I don't know where you come up with
    these. I can only assume this is some bizarre way of proving how wise
    and worldly you think you are.

    Example: Someone who's "proud to be an American" likely had little
    choice in the matter and thus has little basis for pride.

    Of course they have a choice. No one's stopping anyone from leaving and
    renouncing their citizenship.

    "...had..."

    No one was stopping anyone from leaving and renouncing their
    citizenship in
    the past, either.

    Says little about pride. Most live in the state where they were born. >>>>
    That doesn't mean they have no choice in the matter.

    True, if I tell you at gunpoint to eat wasps, you still have a choice... >>
    Yes, because people are being held at gunpoint and prevented from leaving >> their state of birth.

    Great analogy!

    If I'd intended an analogy, "gunpoint" would refer to the enormous inconvenience and stress surrounding a change of citizenship ...

    So people decide to stay where they because they can't bother. Not because they're forced to.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From moviePig@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jul 21 12:56:53 2025
    On 7/21/2025 12:20 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 21, 2025 at 8:54:31 AM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 7/20/2025 5:08 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 20, 2025 at 1:54:01 PM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>
    On 7/20/2025 4:22 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    moviePig <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 7/20/2025 2:21 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 20, 2025 at 11:20:16 AM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 7/20/2025 1:37 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 20, 2025 at 8:08:39 AM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 7/19/2025 6:16 PM, Rhino wrote:


    Once again, you interject an observation that is not on topic or even
    comprehensible to normal people. I don't know where you come up with
    these. I can only assume this is some bizarre way of proving how wise
    and worldly you think you are.

    Example: Someone who's "proud to be an American" likely had little
    choice in the matter and thus has little basis for pride. >>>>>>>>>
    Of course they have a choice. No one's stopping anyone from leaving and
    renouncing their citizenship.

    "...had..."

    No one was stopping anyone from leaving and renouncing their >>>>>>> citizenship in
    the past, either.

    Says little about pride. Most live in the state where they were born.

    That doesn't mean they have no choice in the matter.

    True, if I tell you at gunpoint to eat wasps, you still have a choice... >>>
    Yes, because people are being held at gunpoint and prevented from leaving >>> their state of birth.

    Great analogy!

    If I'd intended an analogy, "gunpoint" would refer to the enormous
    inconvenience and stress surrounding a change of citizenship ...

    So people decide to stay where they because they can't bother. Not because they're forced to.

    What would it take to "force" them to?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BTR1701@21:1/5 to moviePig on Mon Jul 21 18:31:41 2025
    On Jul 21, 2025 at 9:56:53 AM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 7/21/2025 12:20 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 21, 2025 at 8:54:31 AM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote: >>
    On 7/20/2025 5:08 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 20, 2025 at 1:54:01 PM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 7/20/2025 4:22 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    moviePig <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 7/20/2025 2:21 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 20, 2025 at 11:20:16 AM PDT, "moviePig"
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 7/20/2025 1:37 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 20, 2025 at 8:08:39 AM PDT, "moviePig"
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 7/19/2025 6:16 PM, Rhino wrote:


    Once again, you interject an observation that is not on topic or even
    comprehensible to normal people. I don't know where you come up with
    these. I can only assume this is some bizarre way of proving how wise
    and worldly you think you are.

    Example: Someone who's "proud to be an American" likely had little
    choice in the matter and thus has little basis for pride. >>>>>>>>>>
    Of course they have a choice. No one's stopping anyone from leaving and
    renouncing their citizenship.

    "...had..."

    No one was stopping anyone from leaving and renouncing their >>>>>>>> citizenship in
    the past, either.

    Says little about pride. Most live in the state where they were born.

    That doesn't mean they have no choice in the matter.

    True, if I tell you at gunpoint to eat wasps, you still have a choice...

    Yes, because people are being held at gunpoint and prevented from leaving
    their state of birth.

    Great analogy!

    If I'd intended an analogy, "gunpoint" would refer to the enormous
    inconvenience and stress surrounding a change of citizenship ...

    So people decide to stay where they because they can't bother. Not because >> they're forced to.

    What would it take to "force" them to?

    Um... force?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From moviePig@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jul 21 15:39:41 2025
    On 7/21/2025 2:31 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 21, 2025 at 9:56:53 AM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 7/21/2025 12:20 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 21, 2025 at 8:54:31 AM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>
    On 7/20/2025 5:08 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 20, 2025 at 1:54:01 PM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 7/20/2025 4:22 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    moviePig <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 7/20/2025 2:21 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 20, 2025 at 11:20:16 AM PDT, "moviePig"
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 7/20/2025 1:37 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 20, 2025 at 8:08:39 AM PDT, "moviePig"
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 7/19/2025 6:16 PM, Rhino wrote:


    Once again, you interject an observation that is not on topic or even
    comprehensible to normal people. I don't know where you come up with
    these. I can only assume this is some bizarre way of proving how wise
    and worldly you think you are.

    Example: Someone who's "proud to be an American" likely had little
    choice in the matter and thus has little basis for pride. >>>>>>>>>>>
    Of course they have a choice. No one's stopping anyone from leaving and
    renouncing their citizenship.

    "...had..."

    No one was stopping anyone from leaving and renouncing their >>>>>>>>> citizenship in
    the past, either.

    Says little about pride. Most live in the state where they were born.

    That doesn't mean they have no choice in the matter.

    True, if I tell you at gunpoint to eat wasps, you still have a choice...

    Yes, because people are being held at gunpoint and prevented from leaving
    their state of birth.

    Great analogy!

    If I'd intended an analogy, "gunpoint" would refer to the enormous
    inconvenience and stress surrounding a change of citizenship ...

    So people decide to stay where they because they can't bother. Not because
    they're forced to.

    What would it take to "force" them to?

    Um... force?

    Such as?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BTR1701@21:1/5 to moviePig on Mon Jul 21 20:13:18 2025
    On Jul 21, 2025 at 12:39:41 PM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 7/21/2025 2:31 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 21, 2025 at 9:56:53 AM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote: >>
    On 7/21/2025 12:20 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 21, 2025 at 8:54:31 AM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 7/20/2025 5:08 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 20, 2025 at 1:54:01 PM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote:

    On 7/20/2025 4:22 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    moviePig <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 7/20/2025 2:21 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 20, 2025 at 11:20:16 AM PDT, "moviePig"
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 7/20/2025 1:37 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 20, 2025 at 8:08:39 AM PDT, "moviePig"
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 7/19/2025 6:16 PM, Rhino wrote:


    Once again, you interject an observation that is not on topic or even
    comprehensible to normal people. I don't know where you come up with
    these. I can only assume this is some bizarre way of proving how wise
    and worldly you think you are.

    Example: Someone who's "proud to be an American" likely had little
    choice in the matter and thus has little basis for pride. >>>>>>>>>>>>
    Of course they have a choice. No one's stopping anyone from >>>>>>>>>>>> leaving and
    renouncing their citizenship.

    "...had..."

    No one was stopping anyone from leaving and renouncing their >>>>>>>>>> citizenship in
    the past, either.

    Says little about pride. Most live in the state where they were born.

    That doesn't mean they have no choice in the matter.

    True, if I tell you at gunpoint to eat wasps, you still have a choice...

    Yes, because people are being held at gunpoint and prevented from >>>>>> leaving
    their state of birth.

    Great analogy!

    If I'd intended an analogy, "gunpoint" would refer to the enormous >>>>> inconvenience and stress surrounding a change of citizenship ...

    So people decide to stay where they because they can't bother. Not because
    they're forced to.

    What would it take to "force" them to?

    Um... force?

    Such as?

    Such as the force the government typically uses: laws, rules, regulations, statutes, ordinances, and by-laws backed up with men in uniforms with guns.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Your Name@21:1/5 to moviePig on Tue Jul 22 09:27:07 2025
    On 2025-07-21 19:39:41 +0000, moviePig said:
    On 7/21/2025 2:31 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 21, 2025 at 9:56:53 AM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On 7/21/2025 12:20 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 21, 2025 at 8:54:31 AM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> On 7/20/2025 5:08 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 20, 2025 at 1:54:01 PM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 7/20/2025 4:22 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    moviePig <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 7/20/2025 2:21 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 20, 2025 at 11:20:16 AM PDT, "moviePig"
    <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 7/20/2025 1:37 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 20, 2025 at 8:08:39 AM PDT, "moviePig"
    <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 7/19/2025 6:16 PM, Rhino wrote:

    Once again, you interject an observation that is not on topic or even
    comprehensible to normal people. I don't know where you come up with
    these. I can only assume this is some bizarre way of proving how wise
    and worldly you think you are.

    Example: Someone who's "proud to be an American" likely had little
    choice in the matter and thus has little basis for pride. >>>>>>>>>>>>
    Of course they have a choice. No one's stopping anyone from leaving and
    renouncing their citizenship.

    "...had..."

    No one was stopping anyone from leaving and renouncing their >>>>>>>>>> citizenship in the past, either.

    Says little about pride. Most live in the state where they were born.

    That doesn't mean they have no choice in the matter.

    True, if I tell you at gunpoint to eat wasps, you still have a choice...

    Yes, because people are being held at gunpoint and prevented from
    leaving their state of birth.

    Great analogy!

    If I'd intended an analogy, "gunpoint" would refer to the enormous
    inconvenience and stress surrounding a change of citizenship ...

    So people decide to stay where they because they can't bother. Not
    because they're forced to.

    What would it take to "force" them to?

    Um... force?

    Such as?

    North Korea and the Berlin Wall would be two examples where people are
    / were forced to stay in one place, although a few still managed to
    escape and some died trying. Some people with criminal records often
    have limited choices due to other countries not allowing them in.

    On the flip side, many people have of course been forced to leave where
    they lived due to various reasons (wars, famines, etc.).

    There have were two newspaper stories llast week. First, Ellen
    DeGeneres saying how the UK is great (having left the US because of
    Trump). The second was a UK billionaire who is selling up and leaving
    because the UK is such a mess. Two polar opposite views of the same
    country. Obviously you can't please all the people all the time. :-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From moviePig@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jul 21 17:22:16 2025
    On 7/21/2025 4:13 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 21, 2025 at 12:39:41 PM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 7/21/2025 2:31 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 21, 2025 at 9:56:53 AM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>
    On 7/21/2025 12:20 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 21, 2025 at 8:54:31 AM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 7/20/2025 5:08 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 20, 2025 at 1:54:01 PM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    On 7/20/2025 4:22 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    moviePig <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 7/20/2025 2:21 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 20, 2025 at 11:20:16 AM PDT, "moviePig"
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 7/20/2025 1:37 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 20, 2025 at 8:08:39 AM PDT, "moviePig" >>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 7/19/2025 6:16 PM, Rhino wrote:


    Once again, you interject an observation that is not on topic or even
    comprehensible to normal people. I don't know where you come up with
    these. I can only assume this is some bizarre way of proving how wise
    and worldly you think you are.

    Example: Someone who's "proud to be an American" likely had little
    choice in the matter and thus has little basis for pride.

    Of course they have a choice. No one's stopping anyone from
    leaving and
    renouncing their citizenship.

    "...had..."

    No one was stopping anyone from leaving and renouncing their
    citizenship in
    the past, either.

    Says little about pride. Most live in the state where they were born.

    That doesn't mean they have no choice in the matter.

    True, if I tell you at gunpoint to eat wasps, you still have a choice...

    Yes, because people are being held at gunpoint and prevented from >>>>>>> leaving
    their state of birth.

    Great analogy!

    If I'd intended an analogy, "gunpoint" would refer to the enormous >>>>>> inconvenience and stress surrounding a change of citizenship ... >>>>>
    So people decide to stay where they because they can't bother. Not because
    they're forced to.

    What would it take to "force" them to?

    Um... force?

    Such as?

    Such as the force the government typically uses: laws, rules, regulations, statutes, ordinances, and by-laws backed up with men in uniforms with guns.

    Those still leave a choice.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Horny Goat@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Mon Jul 21 19:14:35 2025
    On Sun, 20 Jul 2025 21:08:45 +0000, BTR1701 <[email protected]> wrote:

    Yes, because people are being held at gunpoint and prevented from leaving >their state of birth.

    Most people who leave their state of birth are taken to the new state
    by their parents - I had 3 such moves before I entered first grade.
    Any speculation on how much say I had in the matter? (Ditto my first
    born who was born in Ontario but raised in BC)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Horny Goat@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jul 21 19:11:16 2025
    On Sun, 20 Jul 2025 11:08:39 -0400, moviePig <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    Example: Someone who's "proud to be an American" likely had little
    choice in the matter and thus has little basis for pride.

    Sure we do - but the English girl who turned up for school in the
    Union Jack dress would have been even more badly in trouble if she had
    turned up in a burka since that would be "appropriating" someone else.

    I was born in Canada but as I reached majority could have gone south -
    after all, my most distant relatives I've been able to trace were part
    of the American invasion of Canada (with the NY state militia) in
    1812....my daughter was keen to have me take US citizenship until she
    found out that my claim didn't go to her...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Horny Goat@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Mon Jul 21 19:17:15 2025
    On Mon, 21 Jul 2025 18:31:41 +0000, BTR1701 <[email protected]> wrote:

    So people decide to stay where they because they can't bother. Not because >>> they're forced to.

    What would it take to "force" them to?

    Um... force?

    In my father in law's case, they emigrated from eastern Poland to
    Canada in August 1939 - having to go through Germany, Belgium and
    Britain to get there.

    His home town had a pre-war population of 5000 and a post-war
    population of 450. I'd say his parents made the right choice even if
    you don't count the survivors "privilege" of Soviet rule.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)