With just days to go before the release of "Original Sin" -- a book exploring former President Joe Biden's obvious cognitive decline from Jake Tapper (CNN) and Alex Thompson (Axios) -- everyone on the Sunday political shows was talking about Biden, who knew what, and when they knew it.
For those who don't spend their Sunday mornings glued to the television -- and their Sunday afternoons attempting to dig through a week's worth of network and cable news media spin -- The Daily Wire has compiled a short summary of what you may have missed.
If one were to simply watch those interviews cold, not having lived through four years of a Biden presidency or seen dozens of speeches and interviews even from midway through his single term, one might be inclined to believe the pundits and elected Democrats when they insisted that Biden was absolutely fine at least until his disaster of a televised debate with President Donald Trump -- and, according to at least one, he might even still be fine.
But Democrats and pundits said those things to an audience made up of Americans who did watch Biden as he repeatedly got lost on stage, tripped up the stairs of Air Force One, alternately shouted and whispered at awkward times, and lost his train of thought on a regular basis. Still, they committed to the narrative -- Biden was definitely at his best until maybe the debate, and there was no reason for anyone to suggest otherwise or believe that anyone was covering up Biden's condition.
On ABC's "This Week," Rep. Ro Khanna insisted that there was no cover-up, but also said that the people who had been closest to President Biden during the last year or so of his presidency owed the American people "an explanation -- but he did not clarify why they needed to explain if they were not covering anything up.
"It's painfully obvious President Biden should not have run," Khanna said.
"It's painfully obvious President Biden should not have run."
Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna said there wasn't a cover-up of former
Pres. Biden mental fitness ahead of the 2024 election, but added
those close to Biden and his advisers "owe an explanation."
https://t.co/MTbOVJxR88 pic.twitter.com/9UJQqpL4gF
-- This Week (@ThisWeekABC) May 18, 2025
During a panel discussion later on in the broadcast, former Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Donna Brazile claimed that since she had lost a step or two with age, it was totally fine for the same thing to have happened to Biden.
"I'm going to stick by Joe Biden. And look, we all -- I don't have the pep in my step that I used to have," she said.
On questions of former Pres. Biden's mental fitness ahead of the 2024
election, former DNC chair @DonnaBrazile says, "I'm going to stick
by Joe Biden. And look, we all -- I don't have the pep in my step
that I used to have."https://t.co/KJmZwLyqkW
pic.twitter.com/yPGHteC3gZ
-- This Week (@ThisWeekABC) May 18, 2025
Former Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus pushed back, noting that conservatives had been repeatedly mocked and gaslighted -- not to mention shut down by legacy media hosts -- when they stated the obvious about the president's declining faculties.
"People were put to shame -- me and others out there -- that talked about Joe Biden's mental acuity ... The fact is they were managing his decline in a nursing home in the White House," he said.
Former RNC chair @Reince Priebus: "People were put to shame -- me and
others out there -- that talked about Joe Biden's mental acuity ...
The fact is they were managing his decline in a nursing home in the
White House." https://t.co/mEq24OQYpx pic.twitter.com/glQtYP9iwY
-- This Week (@ThisWeekABC) May 18, 2025
On CBS News' "Face the Nation," Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-MD) took time out from defending criminal illegal alien gang members to address the recently released audio from Biden's interview with former Special Counsel Robert Hur -- which he said shed light on a problem that no one had been aware of at the time.
"Obviously, if we could redo this tape and play it over again, we would do things differently," Van Hollen said. "I think we can acknowledge that this was a -- people overlooked a serious problem or were just not aware."
"Hindsight is 20/20," Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-MD) says of the audio
tapes that have been released of then-President Biden's interview
with special counsel Robert Hur, highlighting Biden's memory lapses
at the time.
"Obviously, if we could redo this tape and play it over again,...
pic.twitter.com/iITJ2PC9aH
-- Face The Nation (@FaceTheNation) May 18, 2025
Sen. Chris Murphy (D-CT) took a similar approach on NBC's "Meet the Press," saying that Democrats might have encouraged Biden to exit the 2024 presidential race sooner if only they had known. Murphy also said that Democrats had been wrong to brush off voters' concerns about Biden's acuity during the 2024 election cycle.
In an exclusive interview with Meet the Press, Sen. Chris Murphy
(D-Conn.) says that former President Biden should have exited the
2024 race earlier as newly released audio tapes renew concerns over
Biden's health and fitness while in office. https://t.co/KU1cqLKcHR
pic.twitter.com/mTJHsYG5rI
-- Meet the Press (@MeetThePress) May 18, 2025
Rep. James Clyburn took things to a whole different level on CNN's "State of the Union," telling anchor Jake Tapper that he wasn't even sure Biden would be incapable of serving a second term in the White House.
"Yes, I thought [he could serve another term] back then. I still think that, but I don't know that," he said.
.@RepJamesClyburn on whether he still believes President Biden could
have served another term: "Yes, I thought that back then. I still
think that, but I don't know that." pic.twitter.com/hfRtH5REyl
-- State of the Union (@CNNSOTU) May 18, 2025
As to Biden's disastrous debate performance, Clyburn continued to play defense. "Whether or not that was just an incident or whether that was a condition that was being kept from people, we have no way of knowing which one was true," he claimed.
.@RepJamesClyburn reflects on Biden's disastrous 2024 debate
performance: "Whether or not that was just an incident or whether
that was a condition that was being kept from people, we have no way
of knowing which one was true." pic.twitter.com/Sso7mSltX0
-- State of the Union (@CNNSOTU) May 18, 2025
Van Jones and David Axelrod were less magnanimous to Biden, his White House, and the party that enabled him.
"There are people who knew and said nothing, and that is a crime against this Republic," Jones said.
"I blame the people around him," Axelrod added. "Real loyalty demanded that they say, 'Mr. President, it's just not there and it's not in your interest' [to run again]."
Longtime Democratic strategists react to new reporting that top
Biden aides hid signs of decline from the public.@VanJones68: "There
are people who knew and said nothing, and that is a crime against
this Republic."@davidaxelrod: "I blame the people around him... real
loyalty... pic.twitter.com/Obz2wpk3Jm
-- State of the Union (@CNNSOTU) May 18, 2025
On 2025-05-19 5:02 AM, Ubiquitous wrote:
With just days to go before the release of "Original Sin" -- a book exploring >>former President Joe Biden's obvious cognitive decline from Jake Tapper (CNN) >>and Alex Thompson (Axios) -- everyone on the Sunday political shows was >>talking about Biden, who knew what, and when they knew it.
For those who don't spend their Sunday mornings glued to the television -- >>and their Sunday afternoons attempting to dig through a week's worth of >>network and cable news media spin -- The Daily Wire has compiled a short >>summary of what you may have missed.
. . .
Rep. James Clyburn took things to a whole different level on CNN's "State of >>the Union," telling anchor Jake Tapper that he wasn't even sure Biden would >>be incapable of serving a second term in the White House.
"Yes, I thought [he could serve another term] back then. I still think that, >>but I don't know that," he said.
.@RepJamesClyburn on whether he still believes President Biden could
have served another term: "Yes, I thought that back then. I still
think that, but I don't know that." pic.twitter.com/hfRtH5REyl
-- State of the Union (@CNNSOTU) May 18, 2025
As to Biden's disastrous debate performance, Clyburn continued to play >>defense. "Whether or not that was just an incident or whether that was a >>condition that was being kept from people, we have no way of knowing which >>one was true," he claimed.
.@RepJamesClyburn reflects on Biden's disastrous 2024 debate
performance: "Whether or not that was just an incident or whether
that was a condition that was being kept from people, we have no way
of knowing which one was true." pic.twitter.com/Sso7mSltX0
-- State of the Union (@CNNSOTU) May 18, 2025
. . .
Is it too late to charge Dr. Jill with elder abuse?
I don't suppose there's anything that can be done legally about the
media lies about Biden being sharp as a tack but that probably doesn't >matter. We know now that they are shameless liars and their credibility
has suffered a well-earned decline. They are surely aware of that as
their ratings/sales fall ever further.
I don't see much of an effort to clean up their acts either: they still
seem determined to gaslight the public with yet more of the same
hysteria that they greeted every word and action uttered by Trump and
his people in his first term. They only calm down when a Democrat is in
the White House and they can go into full-time fluffer mode.
It's fine though. They are destroying themselves so here's hoping
they're completely irrelevant in the near future.
Crosspost to newsgroups Ubi doesn't read cut
Rhino <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2025-05-19 5:02 AM, Ubiquitous wrote:
Here's the citation to the story that Ubi the shithead plagarized.
Spin Cycle: The Fix Is In, And There Was No Fix:
They committed to the narrative...
By Virginia Kruta
The Daily Wire
May 19, 2025 https://www.dailywire.com/news/spin-cycle-the-fix-is-in-and-there-was-no-fix
With just days to go before the release of "Original Sin" -- a book exploring
former President Joe Biden's obvious cognitive decline from Jake Tapper (CNN)
and Alex Thompson (Axios) -- everyone on the Sunday political shows was
talking about Biden, who knew what, and when they knew it.
For those who don't spend their Sunday mornings glued to the television -- >>> and their Sunday afternoons attempting to dig through a week's worth of
network and cable news media spin -- The Daily Wire has compiled a short >>> summary of what you may have missed.
. . .
Rep. James Clyburn took things to a whole different level on CNN's "State of
the Union," telling anchor Jake Tapper that he wasn't even sure Biden would >>> be incapable of serving a second term in the White House.
"Yes, I thought [he could serve another term] back then. I still think that,
but I don't know that," he said.
.@RepJamesClyburn on whether he still believes President Biden could >>> have served another term: "Yes, I thought that back then. I still
think that, but I don't know that." pic.twitter.com/hfRtH5REyl
-- State of the Union (@CNNSOTU) May 18, 2025
As to Biden's disastrous debate performance, Clyburn continued to play
defense. "Whether or not that was just an incident or whether that was a >>> condition that was being kept from people, we have no way of knowing which >>> one was true," he claimed.
.@RepJamesClyburn reflects on Biden's disastrous 2024 debate
performance: "Whether or not that was just an incident or whether
that was a condition that was being kept from people, we have no way >>> of knowing which one was true." pic.twitter.com/Sso7mSltX0
-- State of the Union (@CNNSOTU) May 18, 2025
. . .
Is it too late to charge Dr. Jill with elder abuse?
I don't suppose there's anything that can be done legally about the
media lies about Biden being sharp as a tack but that probably doesn't
matter. We know now that they are shameless liars and their credibility
has suffered a well-earned decline. They are surely aware of that as
their ratings/sales fall ever further.
I don't see much of an effort to clean up their acts either: they still
seem determined to gaslight the public with yet more of the same
hysteria that they greeted every word and action uttered by Trump and
his people in his first term. They only calm down when a Democrat is in
the White House and they can go into full-time fluffer mode.
It's fine though. They are destroying themselves so here's hoping
they're completely irrelevant in the near future.
You might have noticed that America works poorly with two irrelevant
national political parties.
You're not going to learn anything about the book from those talking
heads. They're the target of the book. I listened to radio interviews
with the authors. It was quite disturbing. David Plouffe spoke on record;
no one else did. Most recently, he managed Kamala's campaign.
The "original sin" of the title was not letting Biden have his choice
for running mate -- Gretchen Whitmer -- after the death of George Floyd.
No one in his administration wanted to work with Kamala and no one
thought she was ready to be president nor win an election.
On 2025-05-19 1:03 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
Crosspost to newsgroups Ubi doesn't read cut
Rhino <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2025-05-19 5:02 AM, Ubiquitous wrote:
Here's the citation to the story that Ubi the shithead plagarized.
Spin Cycle: The Fix Is In, And There Was No Fix:
They committed to the narrative...
By Virginia Kruta
The Daily Wire
May 19, 2025
https://www.dailywire.com/news/spin-cycle-the-fix-is-in-and-there-was-no-fix >>
With just days to go before the release of "Original Sin" -- a book
exploring
former President Joe Biden's obvious cognitive decline from Jake
Tapper (CNN)
and Alex Thompson (Axios) -- everyone on the Sunday political shows was >>>> talking about Biden, who knew what, and when they knew it.
For those who don't spend their Sunday mornings glued to the
television --
and their Sunday afternoons attempting to dig through a week's worth of >>>> network and cable news media spin -- The Daily Wire has compiled a
short
summary of what you may have missed.
. . .
Rep. James Clyburn took things to a whole different level on CNN's
"State of
the Union," telling anchor Jake Tapper that he wasn't even sure
Biden would
be incapable of serving a second term in the White House.
"Yes, I thought [he could serve another term] back then. I still
think that,
but I don't know that," he said.
.@RepJamesClyburn on whether he still believes President Biden >>>> could
have served another term: "Yes, I thought that back then. I still >>>> think that, but I don't know that." pic.twitter.com/hfRtH5REyl
-- State of the Union (@CNNSOTU) May 18, 2025
As to Biden's disastrous debate performance, Clyburn continued to play >>>> defense. "Whether or not that was just an incident or whether that
was a
condition that was being kept from people, we have no way of knowing
which
one was true," he claimed.
.@RepJamesClyburn reflects on Biden's disastrous 2024 debate
performance: "Whether or not that was just an incident or whether >>>> that was a condition that was being kept from people, we have no >>>> way
of knowing which one was true." pic.twitter.com/Sso7mSltX0
-- State of the Union (@CNNSOTU) May 18, 2025
. . .
Is it too late to charge Dr. Jill with elder abuse?
I don't suppose there's anything that can be done legally about the
media lies about Biden being sharp as a tack but that probably doesn't
matter. We know now that they are shameless liars and their credibility
has suffered a well-earned decline. They are surely aware of that as
their ratings/sales fall ever further.
I don't see much of an effort to clean up their acts either: they still
seem determined to gaslight the public with yet more of the same
hysteria that they greeted every word and action uttered by Trump and
his people in his first term. They only calm down when a Democrat is in
the White House and they can go into full-time fluffer mode.
It's fine though. They are destroying themselves so here's hoping
they're completely irrelevant in the near future.
You might have noticed that America works poorly with two irrelevant
national political parties.
You're not going to learn anything about the book from those talking
heads. They're the target of the book. I listened to radio interviews
with the authors. It was quite disturbing. David Plouffe spoke on record;
no one else did. Most recently, he managed Kamala's campaign.
The "original sin" of the title was not letting Biden have his choice
for running mate -- Gretchen Whitmer -- after the death of George Floyd.
No one in his administration wanted to work with Kamala and no one
thought she was ready to be president nor win an election.
But Harris was "black" so that seemed like an obvious vote-getter with
the Democrats' traditional base, even though a lot of blacks see her as
more South Asian than one of them. Either way, lots of obvious virtue-signalling points for including Harris on the ticket. Too bad she
was such an unlikable candidate. In any case, America really dodged a
bullet when she failed to excite the electorate.
The Dems have only themselves to blame for their president parlous
state. They ended up running Biden when he was well past his prime
because he was the only one who had a chance against Comrade Bernie and
then saddled him with Harris who was much more an anchor than a sail.
They must have seen how depleted Biden was because they hid him away as
much as they could and counted on their allies in the media to deny his decline. Then they staged that first debate with Trump months earlier
than usual and finally EVERYONE could see that Biden didn't have another
term in him.
Personally, I think that debate happened so early because the people
pulling his strings were certain he was too far gone to run again but
hadn't been able to convince him - and Dr. Jill - that he was done so
they had the debate BECAUSE they knew he would shit the bed AND BE SEEN
TO HAVE DONE SO. It was so bad that they were finally able to get the
House and Senate to (largely) abandon him. Finally, Biden understood
that he was done and stepped aside.
But then, rather than having a proper convention to choose a new
candidate from among several prospects, they essentially appointed
Harris. I don't really understand how that happened and can only
speculate that none of the other potential candidates thought they had a chance of winning from a start that close to Election Day and just
decided to give it to Harris unopposed. They raised a bunch of money and
gave it to her, she blew it all, but failed to impress as a candidate.
The Democrats messed up all the way along by not building a bench of potential candidates going back to Obama's time in office. Everything
else follows from that.
Crosspost to newsgroups Ubi doesn't read cut
Rhino <[email protected]> wrote:
Is it too late to charge Dr. Jill with elder abuse?
I don't suppose there's anything that can be done legally about the
media lies about Biden being sharp as a tack but that probably doesn't
matter. We know now that they are shameless liars and their credibility
has suffered a well-earned decline. They are surely aware of that as
their ratings/sales fall ever further.
I don't see much of an effort to clean up their acts either: they still
seem determined to gaslight the public with yet more of the same
hysteria that they greeted every word and action uttered by Trump and
his people in his first term. They only calm down when a Democrat is in
the White House and they can go into full-time fluffer mode.
It's fine though. They are destroying themselves so here's hoping
they're completely irrelevant in the near future.
You might have noticed that America works poorly with two irrelevant
national political parties.
You're not going to learn anything about the book from those talking
heads. They're the target of the book. I listened to radio interviews
with the authors. It was quite disturbing. David Plouffe spoke on record;
no one else did. Most recently, he managed Kamala's campaign.
The "original sin" of the title was not letting Biden have his choice
for running mate -- Gretchen Whitmer -- after the death of George Floyd.
No one in his administration wanted to work with Kamala and no one
thought she was ready to be president nor win an election.
On 5/19/2025 10:52 AM, Rhino wrote:
On 2025-05-19 1:03 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
Crosspost to newsgroups Ubi doesn't read cut
Rhino <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2025-05-19 5:02 AM, Ubiquitous wrote:
Here's the citation to the story that Ubi the shithead plagarized.
Spin Cycle: The Fix Is In, And There Was No Fix:
They committed to the narrative...
By Virginia Kruta
The Daily Wire
May 19, 2025
https://www.dailywire.com/news/spin-cycle-the-fix-is-in-and-there-was-no-fix
With just days to go before the release of "Original Sin" -- a book >>>>> exploring
former President Joe Biden's obvious cognitive decline from Jake
Tapper (CNN)
and Alex Thompson (Axios) -- everyone on the Sunday political shows was >>>>> talking about Biden, who knew what, and when they knew it.
For those who don't spend their Sunday mornings glued to the
television --
and their Sunday afternoons attempting to dig through a week's worth of >>>>> network and cable news media spin -- The Daily Wire has compiled a
short
summary of what you may have missed.
. . .
Rep. James Clyburn took things to a whole different level on CNN's
"State of
the Union," telling anchor Jake Tapper that he wasn't even sure
Biden would
be incapable of serving a second term in the White House.
"Yes, I thought [he could serve another term] back then. I still
think that,
but I don't know that," he said.
.@RepJamesClyburn on whether he still believes President Biden >>>>> could
have served another term: "Yes, I thought that back then. I still
think that, but I don't know that." pic.twitter.com/hfRtH5REyl >>>
-- State of the Union (@CNNSOTU) May 18, 2025
As to Biden's disastrous debate performance, Clyburn continued to play >>>>> defense. "Whether or not that was just an incident or whether that
was a
condition that was being kept from people, we have no way of knowing >>>>> which
one was true," he claimed.
.@RepJamesClyburn reflects on Biden's disastrous 2024 debate >>>>> performance: "Whether or not that was just an incident or whether
that was a condition that was being kept from people, we have no >>>>> way
of knowing which one was true." pic.twitter.com/Sso7mSltX0
-- State of the Union (@CNNSOTU) May 18, 2025
. . .
Is it too late to charge Dr. Jill with elder abuse?
For the record, Dr Jill is a PHD, not an MD. So there's nothing to
charge her with.
On May 19, 2025 at 11:22:51 AM PDT, "suzeeq" <[email protected]> wrote:
On 5/19/2025 10:52 AM, Rhino wrote:
On 2025-05-19 1:03 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
Crosspost to newsgroups Ubi doesn't read cut
Rhino <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2025-05-19 5:02 AM, Ubiquitous wrote:
Here's the citation to the story that Ubi the shithead plagarized.
Spin Cycle: The Fix Is In, And There Was No Fix:
They committed to the narrative...
By Virginia Kruta
The Daily Wire
May 19, 2025
https://www.dailywire.com/news/spin-cycle-the-fix-is-in-and-there-was-no-fix
With just days to go before the release of "Original Sin" -- a book >>>>>> exploring
former President Joe Biden's obvious cognitive decline from Jake >>>>>> Tapper (CNN)
and Alex Thompson (Axios) -- everyone on the Sunday political shows was
talking about Biden, who knew what, and when they knew it.
For those who don't spend their Sunday mornings glued to the
television --
and their Sunday afternoons attempting to dig through a week's worth of
network and cable news media spin -- The Daily Wire has compiled a >>>>>> short
summary of what you may have missed.
. . .
Rep. James Clyburn took things to a whole different level on CNN's >>>>>> "State of
the Union," telling anchor Jake Tapper that he wasn't even sure
Biden would
be incapable of serving a second term in the White House.
"Yes, I thought [he could serve another term] back then. I still >>>>>> think that,
but I don't know that," he said.
.@RepJamesClyburn on whether he still believes President Biden >>>>>> could
have served another term: "Yes, I thought that back then. I still
think that, but I don't know that." pic.twitter.com/hfRtH5REyl >>>>
-- State of the Union (@CNNSOTU) May 18, 2025
As to Biden's disastrous debate performance, Clyburn continued to play >>>>>> defense. "Whether or not that was just an incident or whether that >>>>>> was a
condition that was being kept from people, we have no way of knowing >>>>>> which
one was true," he claimed.
.@RepJamesClyburn reflects on Biden's disastrous 2024 debate >>>>>> performance: "Whether or not that was just an incident or whether
that was a condition that was being kept from people, we have no
way
of knowing which one was true." pic.twitter.com/Sso7mSltX0 >>>>
-- State of the Union (@CNNSOTU) May 18, 2025
. . .
Is it too late to charge Dr. Jill with elder abuse?
For the record, Dr Jill is a PHD, not an MD. So there's nothing to
charge her with.
Even people without college degrees can be charged with elder abuse.
On 2025-05-19 1:03 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
Rhino <[email protected]> wrote:
2025-05-19 5:02 AM, Ubiquitous wrote:
Here's the citation to the story that Ubi the shithead plagarized.
Spin Cycle: The Fix Is In, And There Was No Fix:
They committed to the narrative...
By Virginia Kruta
The Daily Wire
May 19, 2025 >>https://www.dailywire.com/news/spin-cycle-the-fix-is-in-and-there-was-no-fix
With just days to go before the release of "Original Sin" -- a book >>>>exploring former President Joe Biden's obvious cognitive decline from >>>>Jake Tapper (CNN) and Alex Thompson (Axios) -- everyone on the Sunday >>>>political shows was talking about Biden, who knew what, and when they >>>>knew it.
For those who don't spend their Sunday mornings glued to the television -- >>>>and their Sunday afternoons attempting to dig through a week's worth of >>>>network and cable news media spin -- The Daily Wire has compiled a short >>>>summary of what you may have missed.
. . .
Rep. James Clyburn took things to a whole different level on CNN's >>>>"State of the Union," telling anchor Jake Tapper that he wasn't
even sure Biden would be incapable of serving a second term in the >>>>White House.
think that, but I don't know that," he said.
.@RepJamesClyburn on whether he still believes President Biden could >>>> have served another term: "Yes, I thought that back then. I still
think that, but I don't know that." pic.twitter.com/hfRtH5REyl
-- State of the Union (@CNNSOTU) May 18, 2025
As to Biden's disastrous debate performance, Clyburn continued to
play defense. "Whether or not that was just an incident or whether
that was a condition that was being kept from people, we have no way
of knowing which one was true," he claimed.
.@RepJamesClyburn reflects on Biden's disastrous 2024 debate
performance: "Whether or not that was just an incident or whether
that was a condition that was being kept from people, we have no way >>>> of knowing which one was true." pic.twitter.com/Sso7mSltX0
-- State of the Union (@CNNSOTU) May 18, 2025
. . .
Is it too late to charge Dr. Jill with elder abuse?
I don't suppose there's anything that can be done legally about the
media lies about Biden being sharp as a tack but that probably doesn't >>>matter. We know now that they are shameless liars and their credibility >>>has suffered a well-earned decline. They are surely aware of that as >>>their ratings/sales fall ever further.
I don't see much of an effort to clean up their acts either: they still >>>seem determined to gaslight the public with yet more of the same
hysteria that they greeted every word and action uttered by Trump and
his people in his first term. They only calm down when a Democrat is in >>>the White House and they can go into full-time fluffer mode.
It's fine though. They are destroying themselves so here's hoping
they're completely irrelevant in the near future.
You might have noticed that America works poorly with two irrelevant >>national political parties.
You're not going to learn anything about the book from those talking
heads. They're the target of the book. I listened to radio interviews
with the authors. It was quite disturbing. David Plouffe spoke on record; >>no one else did. Most recently, he managed Kamala's campaign.
The "original sin" of the title was not letting Biden have his choice
for running mate -- Gretchen Whitmer -- after the death of George Floyd.
No one in his administration wanted to work with Kamala and no one
thought she was ready to be president nor win an election.
But Harris was "black" so that seemed like an obvious vote-getter with
the Democrats' traditional base, even though a lot of blacks see her as
more South Asian than one of them.
Either way, lots of obvious virtue-signalling points for including Harris
on the ticket. Too bad she was such an unlikable candidate. In any case, >America really dodged a bullet when she failed to excite the electorate.
The Dems have only themselves to blame for their president parlous
state. They ended up running Biden when he was well past his prime
because he was the only one who had a chance against Comrade Bernie and
then saddled him with Harris who was much more an anchor than a sail.
They must have seen how depleted Biden was because they hid him away as
much as they could and counted on their allies in the media to deny his >decline. Then they staged that first debate with Trump months earlier
than usual and finally EVERYONE could see that Biden didn't have another
term in him.
Personally, I think that debate happened so early because the people
pulling his strings were certain he was too far gone to run again but
hadn't been able to convince him - and Dr. Jill - that he was done so
they had the debate BECAUSE they knew he would shit the bed AND BE SEEN
TO HAVE DONE SO. It was so bad that they were finally able to get the
House and Senate to (largely) abandon him. Finally, Biden understood
that he was done and stepped aside.
But then, rather than having a proper convention to choose a new
candidate from among several prospects, they essentially appointed
Harris. I don't really understand how that happened and can only
speculate that none of the other potential candidates thought they had a >chance of winning from a start that close to Election Day and just
decided to give it to Harris unopposed. They raised a bunch of money and
gave it to her, she blew it all, but failed to impress as a candidate.
The Democrats messed up all the way along by not building a bench of >potential candidates going back to Obama's time in office. Everything
else follows from that.
On 2025-05-19 1:03 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
Crosspost to newsgroups Ubi doesn't read cut
Rhino <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2025-05-19 5:02 AM, Ubiquitous wrote:
Here's the citation to the story that Ubi the shithead plagarized.
Spin Cycle: The Fix Is In, And There Was No Fix:
They committed to the narrative...
By Virginia Kruta
The Daily Wire
May 19, 2025
https://www.dailywire.com/news/spin-cycle-the-fix-is-in-and-there-was-no-fix >>
With just days to go before the release of "Original Sin" -- a book exploring
former President Joe Biden's obvious cognitive decline from Jake Tapper (CNN)
and Alex Thompson (Axios) -- everyone on the Sunday political shows was >>>> talking about Biden, who knew what, and when they knew it.
For those who don't spend their Sunday mornings glued to the television -- >>>> and their Sunday afternoons attempting to dig through a week's worth of >>>> network and cable news media spin -- The Daily Wire has compiled a short >>>> summary of what you may have missed.
. . .
Rep. James Clyburn took things to a whole different level on CNN's "State of
the Union," telling anchor Jake Tapper that he wasn't even sure Biden would
be incapable of serving a second term in the White House.
"Yes, I thought [he could serve another term] back then. I still think that,
but I don't know that," he said.
.@RepJamesClyburn on whether he still believes President Biden could >>>> have served another term: "Yes, I thought that back then. I still
think that, but I don't know that." pic.twitter.com/hfRtH5REyl
-- State of the Union (@CNNSOTU) May 18, 2025
As to Biden's disastrous debate performance, Clyburn continued to play >>>> defense. "Whether or not that was just an incident or whether that was a >>>> condition that was being kept from people, we have no way of knowing which >>>> one was true," he claimed.
.@RepJamesClyburn reflects on Biden's disastrous 2024 debate
performance: "Whether or not that was just an incident or whether
that was a condition that was being kept from people, we have no way >>>> of knowing which one was true." pic.twitter.com/Sso7mSltX0
-- State of the Union (@CNNSOTU) May 18, 2025
. . .
Is it too late to charge Dr. Jill with elder abuse?
I don't suppose there's anything that can be done legally about the
media lies about Biden being sharp as a tack but that probably doesn't
matter. We know now that they are shameless liars and their credibility
has suffered a well-earned decline. They are surely aware of that as
their ratings/sales fall ever further.
I don't see much of an effort to clean up their acts either: they still
seem determined to gaslight the public with yet more of the same
hysteria that they greeted every word and action uttered by Trump and
his people in his first term. They only calm down when a Democrat is in
the White House and they can go into full-time fluffer mode.
It's fine though. They are destroying themselves so here's hoping
they're completely irrelevant in the near future.
You might have noticed that America works poorly with two irrelevant
national political parties.
You're not going to learn anything about the book from those talking
heads. They're the target of the book. I listened to radio interviews
with the authors. It was quite disturbing. David Plouffe spoke on record;
no one else did. Most recently, he managed Kamala's campaign.
The "original sin" of the title was not letting Biden have his choice
for running mate -- Gretchen Whitmer -- after the death of George Floyd.
No one in his administration wanted to work with Kamala and no one
thought she was ready to be president nor win an election.
But Harris was "black" so that seemed like an obvious vote-getter with
the Democrats' traditional base, even though a lot of blacks see her as
more South Asian than one of them. Either way, lots of obvious >virtue-signalling points for including Harris on the ticket. Too bad she
was such an unlikable candidate. In any case, America really dodged a
bullet when she failed to excite the electorate.
The Dems have only themselves to blame for their president parlous
state. They ended up running Biden when he was well past his prime
because he was the only one who had a chance against Comrade Bernie and
then saddled him with Harris who was much more an anchor than a sail.
But then, rather than having a proper convention to choose a new
candidate from among several prospects, they essentially appointed
Harris. I don't really understand how that happened and can only
speculate that none of the other potential candidates thought they had a >chance of winning from a start that close to Election Day and just
decided to give it to Harris unopposed. They raised a bunch of money and
gave it to her, she blew it all, but failed to impress as a candidate.
The Democrats messed up all the way along by not building a bench of >potential candidates going back to Obama's time in office. Everything
else follows from that.
On 5/19/2025 10:52 AM, Rhino wrote:
On 2025-05-19 1:03 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
Crosspost to newsgroups Ubi doesn't read cut
Rhino <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2025-05-19 5:02 AM, Ubiquitous wrote:
Here's the citation to the story that Ubi the shithead plagarized.
Spin Cycle: The Fix Is In, And There Was No Fix:
They committed to the narrative...
By Virginia Kruta
The Daily Wire
May 19, 2025
https://www.dailywire.com/news/spin-cycle-the-fix-is-in-and-there-
was-no-fix
With just days to go before the release of "Original Sin" -- a book
exploring
former President Joe Biden's obvious cognitive decline from Jake
Tapper (CNN)
and Alex Thompson (Axios) -- everyone on the Sunday political shows
was
talking about Biden, who knew what, and when they knew it.
For those who don't spend their Sunday mornings glued to the
television --
and their Sunday afternoons attempting to dig through a week's
worth of
network and cable news media spin -- The Daily Wire has compiled a
short
summary of what you may have missed.
. . .
Rep. James Clyburn took things to a whole different level on CNN's
"State of
the Union," telling anchor Jake Tapper that he wasn't even sure
Biden would
be incapable of serving a second term in the White House.
"Yes, I thought [he could serve another term] back then. I still
think that,
but I don't know that," he said.
.@RepJamesClyburn on whether he still believes President Biden >>>>> could
have served another term: "Yes, I thought that back then. I still >>>>> think that, but I don't know that." pic.twitter.com/hfRtH5REyl >>>
-- State of the Union (@CNNSOTU) May 18, 2025
As to Biden's disastrous debate performance, Clyburn continued to play >>>>> defense. "Whether or not that was just an incident or whether that
was a
condition that was being kept from people, we have no way of
knowing which
one was true," he claimed.
.@RepJamesClyburn reflects on Biden's disastrous 2024 debate >>>>> performance: "Whether or not that was just an incident or whether >>>>> that was a condition that was being kept from people, we have >>>>> no way
of knowing which one was true." pic.twitter.com/Sso7mSltX0
-- State of the Union (@CNNSOTU) May 18, 2025
. . .
Is it too late to charge Dr. Jill with elder abuse?
For the record, Dr Jill is a PHD, not an MD.
So there's nothing to
charge her with.
I don't suppose there's anything that can be done legally about the
media lies about Biden being sharp as a tack but that probably doesn't >>>> matter. We know now that they are shameless liars and their credibility >>>> has suffered a well-earned decline. They are surely aware of that as
their ratings/sales fall ever further.
I don't see much of an effort to clean up their acts either: they still >>>> seem determined to gaslight the public with yet more of the same
hysteria that they greeted every word and action uttered by Trump and
his people in his first term. They only calm down when a Democrat is in >>>> the White House and they can go into full-time fluffer mode.
It's fine though. They are destroying themselves so here's hoping
they're completely irrelevant in the near future.
You might have noticed that America works poorly with two irrelevant
national political parties.
You're not going to learn anything about the book from those talking
heads. They're the target of the book. I listened to radio interviews
with the authors. It was quite disturbing. David Plouffe spoke on
record;
no one else did. Most recently, he managed Kamala's campaign.
The "original sin" of the title was not letting Biden have his choice
for running mate -- Gretchen Whitmer -- after the death of George Floyd. >>> No one in his administration wanted to work with Kamala and no one
thought she was ready to be president nor win an election.
But Harris was "black" so that seemed like an obvious vote-getter with
the Democrats' traditional base, even though a lot of blacks see her
as more South Asian than one of them. Either way, lots of obvious
virtue-signalling points for including Harris on the ticket. Too bad
she was such an unlikable candidate. In any case, America really
dodged a bullet when she failed to excite the electorate.
The Dems have only themselves to blame for their president parlous
state. They ended up running Biden when he was well past his prime
because he was the only one who had a chance against Comrade Bernie
and then saddled him with Harris who was much more an anchor than a
sail. They must have seen how depleted Biden was because they hid him
away as much as they could and counted on their allies in the media to
deny his decline. Then they staged that first debate with Trump months
earlier than usual and finally EVERYONE could see that Biden didn't
have another term in him.
Personally, I think that debate happened so early because the people
pulling his strings were certain he was too far gone to run again but
hadn't been able to convince him - and Dr. Jill - that he was done so
they had the debate BECAUSE they knew he would shit the bed AND BE
SEEN TO HAVE DONE SO. It was so bad that they were finally able to get
the House and Senate to (largely) abandon him. Finally, Biden
understood that he was done and stepped aside.
But then, rather than having a proper convention to choose a new
candidate from among several prospects, they essentially appointed
Harris. I don't really understand how that happened and can only
speculate that none of the other potential candidates thought they had
a chance of winning from a start that close to Election Day and just
decided to give it to Harris unopposed. They raised a bunch of money
and gave it to her, she blew it all, but failed to impress as a
candidate.
The Democrats messed up all the way along by not building a bench of
potential candidates going back to Obama's time in office. Everything
else follows from that.
On 5/19/2025 11:32 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
On May 19, 2025 at 11:22:51 AM PDT, "suzeeq" <[email protected]> wrote:Donnie Jr's post seemed to imply that she was a medical doctor who
On 5/19/2025 10:52 AM, Rhino wrote:
On 2025-05-19 1:03 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
Crosspost to newsgroups Ubi doesn't read cut
Rhino <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2025-05-19 5:02 AM, Ubiquitous wrote:
Here's the citation to the story that Ubi the shithead plagarized. >>>>>
Spin Cycle: The Fix Is In, And There Was No Fix:
They committed to the narrative...
By Virginia Kruta
The Daily Wire
May 19, 2025
https://www.dailywire.com/news/spin-cycle-the-fix-is-in-and-there-
was-no-fix
With just days to go before the release of "Original Sin" -- a >>>>>>> book
exploring
former President Joe Biden's obvious cognitive decline from Jake >>>>>>> Tapper (CNN)
and Alex Thompson (Axios) -- everyone on the Sunday political >>>>>>> shows was
talking about Biden, who knew what, and when they knew it.
For those who don't spend their Sunday mornings glued to the
television --
and their Sunday afternoons attempting to dig through a week's >>>>>>> worth of
network and cable news media spin -- The Daily Wire has compiled a >>>>>>> short
summary of what you may have missed.
. . .
Rep. James Clyburn took things to a whole different level on CNN's >>>>>>> "State of
the Union," telling anchor Jake Tapper that he wasn't even sure >>>>>>> Biden would
be incapable of serving a second term in the White House.
"Yes, I thought [he could serve another term] back then. I still >>>>>>> think that,
but I don't know that," he said.
.@RepJamesClyburn on whether he still believes President Biden
could
have served another term: "Yes, I thought that back then. I >>>>>>> still
think that, but I don't know that." pic.twitter.com/hfRtH5REyl
-- State of the Union (@CNNSOTU) May 18, 2025
As to Biden's disastrous debate performance, Clyburn continued >>>>>>> to play
defense. "Whether or not that was just an incident or whether that >>>>>>> was a
condition that was being kept from people, we have no way of
knowing
which
one was true," he claimed.
.@RepJamesClyburn reflects on Biden's disastrous 2024 debate >>>>>>> performance: "Whether or not that was just an incident or >>>>>>> whether
that was a condition that was being kept from people, we >>>>>>> have no
way
of knowing which one was true." pic.twitter.com/Sso7mSltX0 >>>>>
-- State of the Union (@CNNSOTU) May 18, 2025
. . .
Is it too late to charge Dr. Jill with elder abuse?
For the record, Dr Jill is a PHD, not an MD. So there's nothing to
charge her with.
Even people without college degrees can be charged with elder abuse.
should have seen the symptoms. A wife, with or without a degree, likely
would not.
On Mon, 19 May 2025 13:52:59 -0400, Rhino
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 2025-05-19 1:03 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
Crosspost to newsgroups Ubi doesn't read cut
Rhino <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2025-05-19 5:02 AM, Ubiquitous wrote:
Here's the citation to the story that Ubi the shithead plagarized.
Spin Cycle: The Fix Is In, And There Was No Fix:
They committed to the narrative...
By Virginia Kruta
The Daily Wire
May 19, 2025
https://www.dailywire.com/news/spin-cycle-the-fix-is-in-and-there-was-no-fix
With just days to go before the release of "Original Sin" -- a book exploring
former President Joe Biden's obvious cognitive decline from Jake Tapper (CNN)
and Alex Thompson (Axios) -- everyone on the Sunday political shows was >>>>> talking about Biden, who knew what, and when they knew it.
For those who don't spend their Sunday mornings glued to the television --
and their Sunday afternoons attempting to dig through a week's worth of >>>>> network and cable news media spin -- The Daily Wire has compiled a short >>>>> summary of what you may have missed.
. . .
Rep. James Clyburn took things to a whole different level on CNN's "State of
the Union," telling anchor Jake Tapper that he wasn't even sure Biden would
be incapable of serving a second term in the White House.
"Yes, I thought [he could serve another term] back then. I still think that,
but I don't know that," he said.
.@RepJamesClyburn on whether he still believes President Biden could >>>>> have served another term: "Yes, I thought that back then. I still
think that, but I don't know that." pic.twitter.com/hfRtH5REyl
-- State of the Union (@CNNSOTU) May 18, 2025
As to Biden's disastrous debate performance, Clyburn continued to play >>>>> defense. "Whether or not that was just an incident or whether that was a >>>>> condition that was being kept from people, we have no way of knowing which
one was true," he claimed.
.@RepJamesClyburn reflects on Biden's disastrous 2024 debate
performance: "Whether or not that was just an incident or whether
that was a condition that was being kept from people, we have no way >>>>> of knowing which one was true." pic.twitter.com/Sso7mSltX0
-- State of the Union (@CNNSOTU) May 18, 2025
. . .
Is it too late to charge Dr. Jill with elder abuse?
I don't suppose there's anything that can be done legally about the
media lies about Biden being sharp as a tack but that probably doesn't >>>> matter. We know now that they are shameless liars and their credibility >>>> has suffered a well-earned decline. They are surely aware of that as
their ratings/sales fall ever further.
I don't see much of an effort to clean up their acts either: they still >>>> seem determined to gaslight the public with yet more of the same
hysteria that they greeted every word and action uttered by Trump and
his people in his first term. They only calm down when a Democrat is in >>>> the White House and they can go into full-time fluffer mode.
It's fine though. They are destroying themselves so here's hoping
they're completely irrelevant in the near future.
You might have noticed that America works poorly with two irrelevant
national political parties.
You're not going to learn anything about the book from those talking
heads. They're the target of the book. I listened to radio interviews
with the authors. It was quite disturbing. David Plouffe spoke on record; >>> no one else did. Most recently, he managed Kamala's campaign.
The "original sin" of the title was not letting Biden have his choice
for running mate -- Gretchen Whitmer -- after the death of George Floyd. >>> No one in his administration wanted to work with Kamala and no one
thought she was ready to be president nor win an election.
But Harris was "black" so that seemed like an obvious vote-getter with
the Democrats' traditional base, even though a lot of blacks see her as
more South Asian than one of them. Either way, lots of obvious
virtue-signalling points for including Harris on the ticket. Too bad she
was such an unlikable candidate. In any case, America really dodged a
bullet when she failed to excite the electorate.
She was but then Whitmer was also female so I don't know why she
wasn't allowed to be chosen as running mate or even who is going to
have that power.
The Dems have only themselves to blame for their president parlous
state. They ended up running Biden when he was well past his prime
because he was the only one who had a chance against Comrade Bernie and
then saddled him with Harris who was much more an anchor than a sail.
It's not clear to me that the fault lies with the Democrats in power
as some of what I've read suggested that it was the inner core around
Biden who did their utmost to keep any weaknesses of Biden hidden from everyone, not just the public. It's too bad they couldn't get Biden to
step aside so the Dems could have had a real race for the Presidency
to get a good candidate.
But then, rather than having a proper convention to choose a new
candidate from among several prospects, they essentially appointed
Harris. I don't really understand how that happened and can only
speculate that none of the other potential candidates thought they had a
chance of winning from a start that close to Election Day and just
decided to give it to Harris unopposed. They raised a bunch of money and
gave it to her, she blew it all, but failed to impress as a candidate.
The timing is why I always assumed they went with Harris. She already
had a campaign set up for her by taking over the Biden campaign. If
Biden had stepped aside months earlier I think they would have had a
proper convention to choose another candidate.
The Democrats messed up all the way along by not building a bench of
potential candidates going back to Obama's time in office. Everything
else follows from that.
True, and I can't say the Republicans are doing any better. There are
clearly no standout replacements for Trump when you have people
strongly suggest Vance should be his replacement.
On Mon, 19 May 2025 13:52:59 -0400, Rhino
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 2025-05-19 1:03 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
But then, rather than having a proper convention to choose a new
candidate from among several prospects, they essentially appointed
Harris. I don't really understand how that happened and can only
speculate that none of the other potential candidates thought they had a
chance of winning from a start that close to Election Day and just
decided to give it to Harris unopposed. They raised a bunch of money and
gave it to her, she blew it all, but failed to impress as a candidate.
The timing is why I always assumed they went with Harris. She already
had a campaign set up for her by taking over the Biden campaign.
On 2025-05-19 3:52 PM, shawn wrote:
On Mon, 19 May 2025 13:52:59 -0400, Rhino
<[email protected]> wrote:
The Democrats messed up all the way along by not building a bench of
potential candidates going back to Obama's time in office. Everything
else follows from that.
True, and I can't say the Republicans are doing any better. There are
clearly no standout replacements for Trump when you have people
strongly suggest Vance should be his replacement.
I've heard definite enthusiasm for both Vance and Rubio as Trump's successors. I don't know if any of the rest of his cabinet or major appointments is similarly favoured.
Personally, I've always preferred Ted Cruz over Trump
On May 19, 2025 at 10:03:29 AM PDT, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <[email protected]> wrote:
Crosspost to newsgroups Ubi doesn't read cut
Rhino <[email protected]> wrote:
Is it too late to charge Dr. Jill with elder abuse?
I don't suppose there's anything that can be done legally about the
media lies about Biden being sharp as a tack but that probably doesn't
matter. We know now that they are shameless liars and their credibility
has suffered a well-earned decline. They are surely aware of that as
their ratings/sales fall ever further.
I don't see much of an effort to clean up their acts either: they still
seem determined to gaslight the public with yet more of the same
hysteria that they greeted every word and action uttered by Trump and
his people in his first term. They only calm down when a Democrat is in
the White House and they can go into full-time fluffer mode.
It's fine though. They are destroying themselves so here's hoping
they're completely irrelevant in the near future.
You might have noticed that America works poorly with two irrelevant
national political parties.
You're not going to learn anything about the book from those talking
heads. They're the target of the book. I listened to radio interviews
with the authors. It was quite disturbing. David Plouffe spoke on record;
no one else did. Most recently, he managed Kamala's campaign.
The "original sin" of the title was not letting Biden have his choice
for running mate -- Gretchen Whitmer -- after the death of George Floyd.
No one in his administration wanted to work with Kamala and no one
thought she was ready to be president nor win an election.
And yet it looks like the powers-that-be are maneuvering her to be the next governor of California. If that happens, Illinois can just give up. It'll never catch California in the race to the bottom.
On May 19, 2025 at 2:02:32 PM PDT, "Rhino" <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2025-05-19 3:52 PM, shawn wrote:
On Mon, 19 May 2025 13:52:59 -0400, Rhino
<[email protected]> wrote:
The Democrats messed up all the way along by not building a bench of >>>> potential candidates going back to Obama's time in office. Everything >>>> else follows from that.
True, and I can't say the Republicans are doing any better. There are
clearly no standout replacements for Trump when you have people
strongly suggest Vance should be his replacement.
I've heard definite enthusiasm for both Vance and Rubio as Trump's
successors. I don't know if any of the rest of his cabinet or major
appointments is similarly favoured.
Personally, I've always preferred Ted Cruz over Trump
Ted Cruz is great but he's been unfortunately saddled with resembling a grown-up Eddie Munster, which in this TV world where appearance matters as much (if not more) than substance will leave him forever aspiring to higher office but never achieving it.
On May 19, 2025 at 12:52:27 PM PDT, "shawn" <[email protected]> wrote:
On Mon, 19 May 2025 13:52:59 -0400, Rhino
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 2025-05-19 1:03 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
But then, rather than having a proper convention to choose a new
candidate from among several prospects, they essentially appointed
Harris. I don't really understand how that happened and can only
speculate that none of the other potential candidates thought they had a >>> chance of winning from a start that close to Election Day and just
decided to give it to Harris unopposed. They raised a bunch of money and >>> gave it to her, she blew it all, but failed to impress as a candidate.
She (and the Democrats) seem to believe that being the candidate celebrities like is what wins you elections. No one I know gives a shit who George Clooney
or Oprah or Taylor Swift is voting for when they step into the voting booth to
fill out their ballots. If they think of celebrities at all, it's usually as a
red flag about who *not* to vote for.
The timing is why I always assumed they went with Harris. She already
had a campaign set up for her by taking over the Biden campaign.Good
And she was the only one who could legally take the millions in the Biden war chest. Anyone else would have had to start out from scratch fundraising.
On 2025-05-19 5:07 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On May 19, 2025 at 2:02:32 PM PDT, "Rhino" <[email protected]> >> wrote:There was talk at one point of putting him on the Supreme Court. I like
On 2025-05-19 3:52 PM, shawn wrote:
On Mon, 19 May 2025 13:52:59 -0400, Rhino
<[email protected]> wrote:
The Democrats messed up all the way along by not building a bench of >>>>> potential candidates going back to Obama's time in office. Everything >>>>> else follows from that.
True, and I can't say the Republicans are doing any better. There are >>>> clearly no standout replacements for Trump when you have people
strongly suggest Vance should be his replacement.
I've heard definite enthusiasm for both Vance and Rubio as Trump's
successors. I don't know if any of the rest of his cabinet or major
appointments is similarly favoured.
Personally, I've always preferred Ted Cruz over Trump
Ted Cruz is great but he's been unfortunately saddled with resembling a
grown-up Eddie Munster, which in this TV world where appearance matters as >> much (if not more) than substance will leave him forever aspiring to higher >> office but never achieving it.
that idea. He could do a lot of good there.
On May 19, 2025 at 2:12:49 PM PDT, "Rhino" <[email protected]> >wrote:
On 2025-05-19 5:07 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On May 19, 2025 at 2:02:32 PM PDT, "Rhino" <[email protected]>There was talk at one point of putting him on the Supreme Court. I like
wrote:
On 2025-05-19 3:52 PM, shawn wrote:
On Mon, 19 May 2025 13:52:59 -0400, Rhino
<[email protected]> wrote:
The Democrats messed up all the way along by not building a bench of >>>>>> potential candidates going back to Obama's time in office. Everything >>>>>> else follows from that.
True, and I can't say the Republicans are doing any better. There are >>>>> clearly no standout replacements for Trump when you have people
strongly suggest Vance should be his replacement.
I've heard definite enthusiasm for both Vance and Rubio as Trump's
successors. I don't know if any of the rest of his cabinet or major
appointments is similarly favoured.
Personally, I've always preferred Ted Cruz over Trump
Ted Cruz is great but he's been unfortunately saddled with resembling a >>> grown-up Eddie Munster, which in this TV world where appearance matters as >>> much (if not more) than substance will leave him forever aspiring to higher
office but never achieving it.
that idea. He could do a lot of good there.
Yep, that would be a good fit.
On May 19, 2025 at 12:52:27 PM PDT, "shawn" <[email protected]> wrote:
On Mon, 19 May 2025 13:52:59 -0400, Rhino
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 2025-05-19 1:03 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
But then, rather than having a proper convention to choose a new
candidate from among several prospects, they essentially appointed
Harris. I don't really understand how that happened and can only
speculate that none of the other potential candidates thought they had a >>> chance of winning from a start that close to Election Day and just
decided to give it to Harris unopposed. They raised a bunch of money and >>> gave it to her, she blew it all, but failed to impress as a candidate.
She (and the Democrats) seem to believe that being the candidate celebrities like is what wins you elections. No one I know gives a shit who George Clooney
or Oprah or Taylor Swift is voting for when they step into the voting booth to
fill out their ballots. If they think of celebrities at all, it's usually as a
red flag about who *not* to vote for.
The timing is why I always assumed they went with Harris. She already
had a campaign set up for her by taking over the Biden campaign.
And she was the only one who could legally take the millions in the Biden war chest. Anyone else would have had to start out from scratch fundraising.
On May 19, 2025 at 10:03:29 AM PDT, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <[email protected]> wrote:
Crosspost to newsgroups Ubi doesn't read cut
Rhino <[email protected]> wrote:
Is it too late to charge Dr. Jill with elder abuse?
I don't suppose there's anything that can be done legally about the
media lies about Biden being sharp as a tack but that probably doesn't
matter. We know now that they are shameless liars and their credibility
has suffered a well-earned decline. They are surely aware of that as
their ratings/sales fall ever further.
I don't see much of an effort to clean up their acts either: they still
seem determined to gaslight the public with yet more of the same
hysteria that they greeted every word and action uttered by Trump and
his people in his first term. They only calm down when a Democrat is in
the White House and they can go into full-time fluffer mode.
It's fine though. They are destroying themselves so here's hoping
they're completely irrelevant in the near future.
You might have noticed that America works poorly with two irrelevant
national political parties.
You're not going to learn anything about the book from those talking
heads. They're the target of the book. I listened to radio interviews
with the authors. It was quite disturbing. David Plouffe spoke on record;
no one else did. Most recently, he managed Kamala's campaign.
The "original sin" of the title was not letting Biden have his choice
for running mate -- Gretchen Whitmer -- after the death of George Floyd.
No one in his administration wanted to work with Kamala and no one
thought she was ready to be president nor win an election.
And yet it looks like the powers-that-be are maneuvering her to be the next governor of California. If that happens, Illinois can just give up. It'll never catch California in the race to the bottom.
On 2025-05-19 2:55 PM, suzeeq wrote:
On 5/19/2025 11:32 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
On May 19, 2025 at 11:22:51 AM PDT, "suzeeq" <[email protected]> wrote:Donnie Jr's post seemed to imply that she was a medical doctor who
On 5/19/2025 10:52 AM, Rhino wrote:
On 2025-05-19 1:03 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
Crosspost to newsgroups Ubi doesn't read cut
Rhino <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2025-05-19 5:02 AM, Ubiquitous wrote:
Here's the citation to the story that Ubi the shithead plagarized. >>>>>>
Spin Cycle: The Fix Is In, And There Was No Fix:
They committed to the narrative...
By Virginia Kruta
The Daily Wire
May 19, 2025
https://www.dailywire.com/news/spin-cycle-the-fix-is-in-and-there- >>>>>> was-no-fix
With just days to go before the release of "Original Sin" -- a >>>>>>>> book
exploring
former President Joe Biden's obvious cognitive decline from Jake >>>>>>>> Tapper (CNN)
and Alex Thompson (Axios) -- everyone on the Sunday political >>>>>>>> shows was
talking about Biden, who knew what, and when they knew it.
For those who don't spend their Sunday mornings glued to the >>>>>>>> television --
and their Sunday afternoons attempting to dig through a week's >>>>>>>> worth of
network and cable news media spin -- The Daily Wire has
compiled a
short
summary of what you may have missed.
. . .
Rep. James Clyburn took things to a whole different level on >>>>>>>> CNN's
"State of
the Union," telling anchor Jake Tapper that he wasn't even sure >>>>>>>> Biden would
be incapable of serving a second term in the White House.
"Yes, I thought [he could serve another term] back then. I still >>>>>>>> think that,
but I don't know that," he said.
.@RepJamesClyburn on whether he still believes President >>>>>>>> Biden
could
have served another term: "Yes, I thought that back then. >>>>>>>> I still
think that, but I don't know that."
pic.twitter.com/hfRtH5REyl
-- State of the Union (@CNNSOTU) May 18, 2025
As to Biden's disastrous debate performance, Clyburn continued >>>>>>>> to play
defense. "Whether or not that was just an incident or whether >>>>>>>> that
was a
condition that was being kept from people, we have no way of >>>>>>>> knowing
which
one was true," he claimed.
.@RepJamesClyburn reflects on Biden's disastrous 2024 debate
performance: "Whether or not that was just an incident or >>>>>>>> whether
that was a condition that was being kept from people, we >>>>>>>> have no
way
of knowing which one was true." pic.twitter.com/Sso7mSltX0 >>>>>>
-- State of the Union (@CNNSOTU) May 18, 2025
. . .
Is it too late to charge Dr. Jill with elder abuse?
For the record, Dr Jill is a PHD, not an MD. So there's nothing to
charge her with.
Even people without college degrees can be charged with elder abuse.
should have seen the symptoms. A wife, with or without a degree,
likely would not.
Donnie Jr. isn't in this thread. Do you mean me?
On 5/19/25 11:28 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
On May 19, 2025 at 10:03:29 AM PDT, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <[email protected]>
wrote:
Crosspost to newsgroups Ubi doesn't read cut
Rhino <[email protected]> wrote:
Is it too late to charge Dr. Jill with elder abuse?
I don't suppose there's anything that can be done legally about the
media lies about Biden being sharp as a tack but that probably doesn't >>>> matter. We know now that they are shameless liars and their credibility >>>> has suffered a well-earned decline. They are surely aware of that as
their ratings/sales fall ever further.
I don't see much of an effort to clean up their acts either: they still >>>> seem determined to gaslight the public with yet more of the same
hysteria that they greeted every word and action uttered by Trump and
his people in his first term. They only calm down when a Democrat is in >>>> the White House and they can go into full-time fluffer mode.
It's fine though. They are destroying themselves so here's hoping
they're completely irrelevant in the near future.
You might have noticed that America works poorly with two irrelevant
national political parties.
You're not going to learn anything about the book from those talking
heads. They're the target of the book. I listened to radio interviews
with the authors. It was quite disturbing. David Plouffe spoke on record; >>> no one else did. Most recently, he managed Kamala's campaign.
The "original sin" of the title was not letting Biden have his choice
for running mate -- Gretchen Whitmer -- after the death of George Floyd. >>> No one in his administration wanted to work with Kamala and no one
thought she was ready to be president nor win an election.
And yet it looks like the powers-that-be are maneuvering her to be the next >> governor of California. If that happens, Illinois can just give up. It'll
never catch California in the race to the bottom.
You're right - that will beat Adam in one move.
Crosspost to newsgroups Ubi doesn't read
Rhino <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2025-05-19 5:02 AM, Ubiquitous wrote:
Here's the citation to the story that Ubi the shithead plagarized.
On 5/19/2025 10:52 AM, Rhino wrote:
On 2025-05-19 1:03 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
Rhino <[email protected]> wrote:
Is it too late to charge Dr. Jill with elder abuse?
For the record, Dr Jill is a PHD, not an MD. So there's nothing to
charge her with.
On 5/19/2025 10:52 AM, Rhino wrote:
On 2025-05-19 1:03 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
Crosspost to newsgroups Ubi doesn't read cut
Rhino <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2025-05-19 5:02 AM, Ubiquitous wrote:
Here's the citation to the story that Ubi the shithead
plagarized.
Spin Cycle: The Fix Is In, And There Was No Fix:
They committed to the narrative...
By Virginia Kruta
The Daily Wire
May 19, 2025
https://www.dailywire.com/news/spin-cycle-the-fix-is-in-and-there-was-no-fix
With just days to go before the release of "Original
Sin" -- a book exploring
former President Joe Biden's obvious cognitive decline
from Jake Tapper (CNN)
and Alex Thompson (Axios) -- everyone on the Sunday
political shows was talking about Biden, who knew
what, and when they knew it.
For those who don't spend their Sunday mornings glued
to the television --
and their Sunday afternoons attempting to dig through
a week's worth of network and cable news media spin --
The Daily Wire has compiled a short
summary of what you may have missed.
. . .
Rep. James Clyburn took things to a whole different
level on CNN's "State of
the Union," telling anchor Jake Tapper that he wasn't
even sure Biden would
be incapable of serving a second term in the White
House.
"Yes, I thought [he could serve another term] back
then. I still think that,
but I don't know that," he said.
.@RepJamesClyburn on whether he still believes
President Biden could
have served another term: "Yes, I thought that back
then. I still think that, but I don't know that."
pic.twitter.com/hfRtH5REyl
-- State of the Union (@CNNSOTU) May 18, 2025
As to Biden's disastrous debate performance, Clyburn
continued to play defense. "Whether or not that was
just an incident or whether that was a
condition that was being kept from people, we have no
way of knowing which
one was true," he claimed.
.@RepJamesClyburn reflects on Biden's disastrous 2024
debate performance: "Whether or not that was just an
incident or whether that was a condition that was
being kept from people, we have no way
of knowing which one was true."
pic.twitter.com/Sso7mSltX0
-- State of the Union (@CNNSOTU) May 18, 2025
. . .
Is it too late to charge Dr. Jill with elder abuse?
For the record, Dr Jill is a PHD, not an MD. So there's
nothing to charge her with.
On 5/19/2025 11:32 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
On May 19, 2025 at 11:22:51 AM PDT, "suzeeq" <[email protected]> wrote:
On 5/19/2025 10:52 AM, Rhino wrote:
On 2025-05-19 1:03 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
Rhino <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2025-05-19 5:02 AM, Ubiquitous wrote:
Donnie Jr's post seemed to imply that she was a medical doctor whoWith just days to go before the release of "Original Sin" -- a book exploring
former President Joe Biden's obvious cognitive decline from Jake Tapper (CNN)
and Alex Thompson (Axios) -- everyone on the Sunday political shows was >>>>>>> talking about Biden, who knew what, and when they knew it.
For those who don't spend their Sunday mornings glued to the television --
and their Sunday afternoons attempting to dig through a week's worth of >>>>>>> network and cable news media spin -- The Daily Wire has compiled a short
summary of what you may have missed.
If one were to simply watch those interviews cold, not having lived through
four years of a Biden presidency or seen dozens of speeches and interviews
even from midway through his single term, one might be inclined to believe
the pundits and elected Democrats when they insisted that Biden was >>>>>>> absolutely fine at least until his disaster of a televised debate with >>>>>>> President Donald Trump -- and, according to at least one, he might even still
be fine.
But Democrats and pundits said those things to an audience made up of >>>>>>> Americans who did watch Biden as he repeatedly got lost on stage, tripped up
the stairs of Air Force One, alternately shouted and whispered at awkward
times, and lost his train of thought on a regular basis. Still, they >>>>>>> committed to the narrative -- Biden was definitely at his best until maybe
the debate, and there was no reason for anyone to suggest otherwise or >>>>>>> believe that anyone was covering up Biden's condition.
On ABC's "This Week," Rep. Ro Khanna insisted that there was no cover-up, but
also said that the people who had been closest to President Biden during the
last year or so of his presidency owed the American people "an explanation --
but he did not clarify why they needed to explain if they were not covering
anything up.
"It's painfully obvious President Biden should not have run," Khanna said.
"It's painfully obvious President Biden should not have run." >>>>>>>
Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna said there wasn't a cover-up of former >>>>>>> Pres. Biden mental fitness ahead of the 2024 election, but added >>>>>>> those close to Biden and his advisers "owe an explanation." >>>>>>> https://t.co/MTbOVJxR88 pic.twitter.com/9UJQqpL4gF
-- This Week (@ThisWeekABC) May 18, 2025
During a panel discussion later on in the broadcast, former Democratic >>>>>>> National Committee Chairwoman Donna Brazile claimed that since she had lost a
step or two with age, it was totally fine for the same thing to have happened
to Biden.
"I'm going to stick by Joe Biden. And look, we all -- I don't have the pep in
my step that I used to have," she said.
On questions of former Pres. Biden's mental fitness ahead of the 2024
election, former DNC chair @DonnaBrazile says, "I'm going to stick
by Joe Biden. And look, we all -- I don't have the pep in my step
that I used to have."https://t.co/KJmZwLyqkW
pic.twitter.com/yPGHteC3gZ
-- This Week (@ThisWeekABC) May 18, 2025
Former Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus pushed back,
noting that conservatives had been repeatedly mocked and gaslighted -- not to
mention shut down by legacy media hosts -- when they stated the obvious about
the president's declining faculties.
"People were put to shame -- me and others out there -- that talked about Joe
Biden's mental acuity ... The fact is they were managing his decline in a
nursing home in the White House," he said.
Former RNC chair @Reince Priebus: "People were put to shame -- me and
others out there -- that talked about Joe Biden's mental acuity ...
The fact is they were managing his decline in a nursing home in the
White House." https://t.co/mEq24OQYpx pic.twitter.com/glQtYP9iwY >>>>>>>
-- This Week (@ThisWeekABC) May 18, 2025
On CBS News' "Face the Nation," Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-MD) took time out
from defending criminal illegal alien gang members to address the recently
released audio from Biden's interview with former Special Counsel Robert Hur
-- which he said shed light on a problem that no one had been aware of at the
time.
"Obviously, if we could redo this tape and play it over again, we would do
things differently," Van Hollen said. "I think we can acknowledge that this
was a -- people overlooked a serious problem or were just not aware." >>>>>>>
"Hindsight is 20/20," Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-MD) says of the audio
tapes that have been released of then-President Biden's interview
with special counsel Robert Hur, highlighting Biden's memory lapses
at the time.
"Obviously, if we could redo this tape and play it over again,...
pic.twitter.com/iITJ2PC9aH
-- Face The Nation (@FaceTheNation) May 18, 2025
Sen. Chris Murphy (D-CT) took a similar approach on NBC's "Meet the Press,"
saying that Democrats might have encouraged Biden to exit the 2024 >>>>>>> presidential race sooner if only they had known. Murphy also said that >>>>>>> Democrats had been wrong to brush off voters' concerns about Biden's acuity
during the 2024 election cycle.
In an exclusive interview with Meet the Press, Sen. Chris Murphy >>>>>>> (D-Conn.) says that former President Biden should have exited the
2024 race earlier as newly released audio tapes renew concerns over
Biden's health and fitness while in office. https://t.co/KU1cqLKcHR
pic.twitter.com/mTJHsYG5rI
-- Meet the Press (@MeetThePress) May 18, 2025
Rep. James Clyburn took things to a whole different level on CNN's "State of
the Union," telling anchor Jake Tapper that he wasn't even sure Biden would
be incapable of serving a second term in the White House.
"Yes, I thought [he could serve another term] back then. I still think that,
but I don't know that," he said.
.@RepJamesClyburn on whether he still believes President Biden could
have served another term: "Yes, I thought that back then. I still
think that, but I don't know that." pic.twitter.com/hfRtH5REyl >>>>>>>
-- State of the Union (@CNNSOTU) May 18, 2025
As to Biden's disastrous debate performance, Clyburn continued to play >>>>>>> defense. "Whether or not that was just an incident or whether that was a
condition that was being kept from people, we have no way of knowing which
one was true," he claimed.
.@RepJamesClyburn reflects on Biden's disastrous 2024 debate >>>>>>> performance: "Whether or not that was just an incident or whether
that was a condition that was being kept from people, we have no way
of knowing which one was true." pic.twitter.com/Sso7mSltX0 >>>>>>>
-- State of the Union (@CNNSOTU) May 18, 2025
Van Jones and David Axelrod were less magnanimous to Biden, his White House,
and the party that enabled him.
"There are people who knew and said nothing, and that is a crime against this
Republic," Jones said.
"I blame the people around him," Axelrod added. "Real loyalty demanded that
they say, 'Mr. President, it's just not there and it's not in your interest'
[to run again]."
Longtime Democratic strategists react to new reporting that top >>>>>>> Biden aides hid signs of decline from the public.@VanJones68: "There
are people who knew and said nothing, and that is a crime against
this Republic."@davidaxelrod: "I blame the people around him... real
loyalty... pic.twitter.com/Obz2wpk3Jm
-- State of the Union (@CNNSOTU) May 18, 2025
Is it too late to charge Dr. Jill with elder abuse?
For the record, Dr Jill is a PHD, not an MD. So there's nothing to
charge her with.
Even people without college degrees can be charged with elder abuse.
should have seen the symptoms. A wife, with or without a degree, likely
would not.
Ian J. Ball <[email protected]d> wrote:
On 5/19/25 11:28 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
On May 19, 2025 at 10:03:29 AM PDT, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <[email protected]>
wrote:
Crosspost to newsgroups Ubi doesn't read cut
Rhino <[email protected]> wrote:
Is it too late to charge Dr. Jill with elder abuse?
I don't suppose there's anything that can be done legally about the
media lies about Biden being sharp as a tack but that probably doesn't >>>>> matter. We know now that they are shameless liars and their credibility >>>>> has suffered a well-earned decline. They are surely aware of that as >>>>> their ratings/sales fall ever further.
I don't see much of an effort to clean up their acts either: they still >>>>> seem determined to gaslight the public with yet more of the same
hysteria that they greeted every word and action uttered by Trump and >>>>> his people in his first term. They only calm down when a Democrat is in >>>>> the White House and they can go into full-time fluffer mode.
It's fine though. They are destroying themselves so here's hoping
they're completely irrelevant in the near future.
You might have noticed that America works poorly with two irrelevant
national political parties.
You're not going to learn anything about the book from those talking
heads. They're the target of the book. I listened to radio interviews
with the authors. It was quite disturbing. David Plouffe spoke on record; >>>> no one else did. Most recently, he managed Kamala's campaign.
The "original sin" of the title was not letting Biden have his choice
for running mate -- Gretchen Whitmer -- after the death of George Floyd. >>>> No one in his administration wanted to work with Kamala and no one
thought she was ready to be president nor win an election.
And yet it looks like the powers-that-be are maneuvering her to be the next >>> governor of California. If that happens, Illinois can just give up. It'll >>> never catch California in the race to the bottom.
You're right - that will beat Adam in one move.
Yeah, 'cuz it's possible that my state could run out of politicians who
will act against the interest of contituents.
Adam H. Kerman <[email protected]> wrote:
Ian J. Ball <[email protected]d> wrote:
On 5/19/25 11:28 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
On May 19, 2025 at 10:03:29 AM PDT, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <[email protected]> >>>> wrote:
Crosspost to newsgroups Ubi doesn't read cut
Rhino <[email protected]> wrote:
Is it too late to charge Dr. Jill with elder abuse?
I don't suppose there's anything that can be done legally about the >>>>>> media lies about Biden being sharp as a tack but that probably doesn't >>>>>> matter. We know now that they are shameless liars and their credibility >>>>>> has suffered a well-earned decline. They are surely aware of that as >>>>>> their ratings/sales fall ever further.
I don't see much of an effort to clean up their acts either: they still >>>>>> seem determined to gaslight the public with yet more of the same
hysteria that they greeted every word and action uttered by Trump and >>>>>> his people in his first term. They only calm down when a Democrat is in >>>>>> the White House and they can go into full-time fluffer mode.
It's fine though. They are destroying themselves so here's hoping >>>>>> they're completely irrelevant in the near future.
You might have noticed that America works poorly with two irrelevant >>>>> national political parties.
You're not going to learn anything about the book from those talking >>>>> heads. They're the target of the book. I listened to radio interviews >>>>> with the authors. It was quite disturbing. David Plouffe spoke on record;
no one else did. Most recently, he managed Kamala's campaign.
The "original sin" of the title was not letting Biden have his choice >>>>> for running mate -- Gretchen Whitmer -- after the death of George Floyd. >>>>> No one in his administration wanted to work with Kamala and no one
thought she was ready to be president nor win an election.
And yet it looks like the powers-that-be are maneuvering her to be the next
governor of California. If that happens, Illinois can just give up. It'll >>>> never catch California in the race to the bottom.
You're right - that will beat Adam in one move.
Yeah, 'cuz it's possible that my state could run out of politicians who
will act against the interest of contituents.
Kamala! Kamala! Kamala!
The political tremors will set off actual tremors in the San Andrea
Fault! Lex Luthor's evil real estate development scheme is coming to fruition!
https://apnews.com/article/kamala-harris-2028-democrats-california-president-governor-6d3b5bef946b9c51c8096328865d3a84
May 22, 2025 at 9:44:53 PM PDT, Adam H. Kerman <[email protected]> wrote:
Adam H. Kerman <[email protected]> wrote:
Ian J. Ball <[email protected]d> wrote:
5/19/25 11:28 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
May 19, 2025 at 10:03:29 AM PDT, Adam H. Kerman <[email protected]>:
. . .
The "original sin" of the title was not letting Biden have his choice >>>>>>for running mate -- Gretchen Whitmer -- after the death of George Floyd. >>>>>>No one in his administration wanted to work with Kamala and no one >>>>>>thought she was ready to be president nor win an election.
And yet it looks like the powers-that-be are maneuvering her to be >>>>>the next governor of California. If that happens, Illinois can just >>>>>give up. It'll never catch California in the race to the bottom.
You're right - that will beat Adam in one move.
Yeah, 'cuz it's possible that my state could run out of politicians who >>>will act against the interest of contituents.
Kamala! Kamala! Kamala!
The political tremors will set off actual tremors in the San Andrea
Fault! Lex Luthor's evil real estate development scheme is coming to >>fruition!
https://apnews.com/article/kamala-harris-2028-democrats-california-president-governor-6d3b5bef946b9c51c8096328865d3a84
It's telling that all their "pros" and "cons" are in relation to
her. What's good for her, what's not good for her. Not what's good for
the country or the state of California.
BTR1701 <[email protected]> wrote:
May 22, 2025 at 9:44:53 PM PDT, Adam H. Kerman <[email protected]> wrote:
Adam H. Kerman <[email protected]> wrote:
Ian J. Ball <[email protected]d> wrote:
5/19/25 11:28 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
May 19, 2025 at 10:03:29 AM PDT, Adam H. Kerman <[email protected]>:
. . .
The "original sin" of the title was not letting Biden have his choice >>>>>>> for running mate -- Gretchen Whitmer -- after the death of George Floyd.
No one in his administration wanted to work with Kamala and no one >>>>>>> thought she was ready to be president nor win an election.
And yet it looks like the powers-that-be are maneuvering her to be >>>>>> the next governor of California. If that happens, Illinois can just >>>>>> give up. It'll never catch California in the race to the bottom.
You're right - that will beat Adam in one move.
Yeah, 'cuz it's possible that my state could run out of politicians who >>>> will act against the interest of contituents.
Kamala! Kamala! Kamala!
The political tremors will set off actual tremors in the San Andrea
Fault! Lex Luthor's evil real estate development scheme is coming to
fruition!
https://apnews.com/article/kamala-harris-2028-democrats-california-president-governor-6d3b5bef946b9c51c8096328865d3a84
It's telling that all their "pros" and "cons" are in relation to
her. What's good for her, what's not good for her. Not what's good for
the country or the state of California.
Keeping her in California and never letting her leave is good for the country. The national media is providing a public service here.
It's retaliation for inflicting someone who grew up in San Francisco
politics mentored by Mayor Willie Brown
seemingly without learning too
many lessons from politics, upon the rest of the nation. I will never
forgive her for those 2020 debate tactics attacking Joe Biden as a
racist for opposing school busing decades ago, that somehow made her an acceptable candidate for vice president 'cuz she'd been, er, politically vetted for she made me feel sympathy for Biden.
Revenge REVENGE!
Oh! I forgot. BUILD THE WALL
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 715 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 21:53:51 |
| Calls: | 12,104 |
| Calls today: | 4 |
| Files: | 15,004 |
| Messages: | 6,518,115 |