• Re: [OT] Liberal MP proposes turning in his Conservative rival to China

    From BTR1701@21:1/5 to moviePig on Tue Apr 1 04:52:05 2025
    On Mar 31, 2025 at 2:55:42 PM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 3/31/2025 5:13 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Mar 31, 2025 at 2:02:23 PM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote: >>
    On 3/31/2025 2:57 PM, Rhino wrote:
    On 2025-03-31 1:51 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
    Rhino <[email protected]> wrote:

    A Liberal MP made a very controversial statement recently that has him
    in hot water, at least with the opposition, during the current federal
    election.

    Paul Chiang, a sitting Liberal MP running for re-election, wrote a >>>>>> comment in Chinese media, that his Conservative opponent, Joe Tay, a >>>>>> city councillor, should be turned in to the Chinese consulate in Toronto
    for a bounty. Tay is originally from Hong Kong where he ran afoul of the
    local authorities for his anti-Beijing activism.

    https://vancouversun.com/news/federal_election/transnational-
    repression-jenny-kwan-weighs-in-on-liberal-mps-chinese-bounty-quip >>>>>
    Liberals are apparently insisting that Chiang's remark was just a joke
    but the opposition parties, Conservative and NDP alike, are calling for
    Chiang to step down and get replaced by another candidate. Mark Carney,
    the new Liberal leader, has the power to dump candidates but is >>>>>> resisting demands to dump Chiang.

    Given the media's love of Liberals, I'm expecting this story to die >>>>>> quickly. I was surprised to learn that Chiang was a cop for 28 years. >>>>>
    Ok. I'm a defender of the use of off-color jokes and bitter sarcasm in >>>>> public speech to make a point, and condemn those who infer racist or >>>>> hate speech, taking the remarks out of context.

    If he were contrasting Canada as a free society with China, he could >>>>> have said that he'd be subject to arrest in China, but in Canada, he's >>>>> perfectly free to run against an incumbant.

    But a bounty? I can't imagine a scenario in which that's funny. He needs
    to apologize. What a jerk.

    Proposing to turn in Tay to the Chinese, when his native Hong Kong
    actually HAS a bounty on him of $153K for his pro-democracy activism is >>>> pretty damned ominous in my opinion.

    Apparently Chiang *has* apologized and that's enough for Carney but not >>>> for the opposition parties. I'm not sure it's enough for me either. The >>>> opposition parties may well be pushing this to see if it can hurt Chiang
    and/or Carney. I'm concerned that Chiang may actually be serious.

    Personally, many of us here are concerned about foreign powers
    manipulating our elections by helping candidates they favour and making >>>> it more difficult for candidates that they see as hostile to them. I >>>> don't want our MPs chosen by the CCP, Putin or the USA!

    We had a major inquiry into this matter just a year or two back,
    although I never heard a final report. I don't know if the inquiry is >>>> still mulling things over or if the guilty parties have somehow kept it >>>> from reporting. Maybe I just missed the news when it came out.

    You're concerned he might seriously try to bounty-hunt his opponent?

    Seriously?

    Were you concerned that Sarah Palin was seriously planning to have a sniper >> shoot Democrat congressional candidates in the districts her website labeled
    with crosshairs?

    Ummm ...no?

    Well, most of the Democrat establishment certainly claimed to be after the Loughner shooting.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BTR1701@21:1/5 to moviePig on Tue Apr 1 04:53:17 2025
    On Mar 31, 2025 at 3:06:25 PM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 3/31/2025 5:25 PM, Rhino wrote:
    On 2025-03-31 5:02 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 3/31/2025 2:57 PM, Rhino wrote:
    On 2025-03-31 1:51 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
    Rhino <[email protected]> wrote:

    A Liberal MP made a very controversial statement recently that has him >>>>>> in hot water, at least with the opposition, during the current federal >>>>>> election.

    Paul Chiang, a sitting Liberal MP running for re-election, wrote a >>>>>> comment in Chinese media, that his Conservative opponent, Joe Tay, a >>>>>> city councillor, should be turned in to the Chinese consulate in
    Toronto
    for a bounty. Tay is originally from Hong Kong where he ran afoul >>>>>> of the
    local authorities for his anti-Beijing activism.

    https://vancouversun.com/news/federal_election/transnational-
    repression-jenny-kwan-weighs-in-on-liberal-mps-chinese-bounty-quip >>>>>
    Liberals are apparently insisting that Chiang's remark was just a joke >>>>>> but the opposition parties, Conservative and NDP alike, are calling >>>>>> for
    Chiang to step down and get replaced by another candidate. Mark
    Carney,
    the new Liberal leader, has the power to dump candidates but is
    resisting demands to dump Chiang.

    Given the media's love of Liberals, I'm expecting this story to die >>>>>> quickly. I was surprised to learn that Chiang was a cop for 28 years. >>>>>
    Ok. I'm a defender of the use of off-color jokes and bitter sarcasm in >>>>> public speech to make a point, and condemn those who infer racist or >>>>> hate speech, taking the remarks out of context.

    If he were contrasting Canada as a free society with China, he could >>>>> have said that he'd be subject to arrest in China, but in Canada, he's >>>>> perfectly free to run against an incumbant.

    But a bounty? I can't imagine a scenario in which that's funny. He
    needs
    to apologize. What a jerk.

    Proposing to turn in Tay to the Chinese, when his native Hong Kong
    actually HAS a bounty on him of $153K for his pro-democracy activism
    is pretty damned ominous in my opinion.

    Apparently Chiang *has* apologized and that's enough for Carney but
    not for the opposition parties. I'm not sure it's enough for me
    either. The opposition parties may well be pushing this to see if it
    can hurt Chiang and/or Carney. I'm concerned that Chiang may actually >>>> be serious.

    Personally, many of us here are concerned about foreign powers
    manipulating our elections by helping candidates they favour and
    making it more difficult for candidates that they see as hostile to
    them. I don't want our MPs chosen by the CCP, Putin or the USA!

    We had a major inquiry into this matter just a year or two back,
    although I never heard a final report. I don't know if the inquiry is >>>> still mulling things over or if the guilty parties have somehow kept
    it from reporting. Maybe I just missed the news when it came out.

    You're concerned he might seriously try to bounty-hunt his opponent?

    Seriously?


    Probably not personally but he was proposing that others in the
    "community" do so and there are a LOT of Chinese-Canadians in that area.
    Some of them certainly have more loyalty to the CCP than Canada if their
    participation if pro-China demonstrations are any guide.

    A reward of at least $183,000 gives anyone a lot of incentive to bring
    Mr. Tay to the Chinese consulate or one of their secret police stations.

    Then I'll concede that it seems at least in clumsy bad taste ...though
    I'm surprised to hear that CCP loyalists abound in North America.

    Not only abound, but have some famous Americans among their ranks, not the least of which have the surname Biden.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From moviePig@21:1/5 to All on Tue Apr 1 10:53:53 2025
    On 4/1/2025 12:52 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Mar 31, 2025 at 2:55:42 PM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 3/31/2025 5:13 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Mar 31, 2025 at 2:02:23 PM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>
    On 3/31/2025 2:57 PM, Rhino wrote:
    On 2025-03-31 1:51 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
    Rhino <[email protected]> wrote:

    A Liberal MP made a very controversial statement recently that has him
    in hot water, at least with the opposition, during the current federal
    election.

    Paul Chiang, a sitting Liberal MP running for re-election, wrote a >>>>>>> comment in Chinese media, that his Conservative opponent, Joe Tay, a
    city councillor, should be turned in to the Chinese consulate in Toronto
    for a bounty. Tay is originally from Hong Kong where he ran afoul of the
    local authorities for his anti-Beijing activism.

    https://vancouversun.com/news/federal_election/transnational- >>>>>>> repression-jenny-kwan-weighs-in-on-liberal-mps-chinese-bounty-quip >>>>>>
    Liberals are apparently insisting that Chiang's remark was just a joke
    but the opposition parties, Conservative and NDP alike, are calling for
    Chiang to step down and get replaced by another candidate. Mark Carney,
    the new Liberal leader, has the power to dump candidates but is >>>>>>> resisting demands to dump Chiang.

    Given the media's love of Liberals, I'm expecting this story to die >>>>>>> quickly. I was surprised to learn that Chiang was a cop for 28 years.

    Ok. I'm a defender of the use of off-color jokes and bitter sarcasm in
    public speech to make a point, and condemn those who infer racist or >>>>>> hate speech, taking the remarks out of context.

    If he were contrasting Canada as a free society with China, he could >>>>>> have said that he'd be subject to arrest in China, but in Canada, he's
    perfectly free to run against an incumbant.

    But a bounty? I can't imagine a scenario in which that's funny. He needs
    to apologize. What a jerk.

    Proposing to turn in Tay to the Chinese, when his native Hong Kong >>>>> actually HAS a bounty on him of $153K for his pro-democracy activism is
    pretty damned ominous in my opinion.

    Apparently Chiang *has* apologized and that's enough for Carney but not
    for the opposition parties. I'm not sure it's enough for me either. The
    opposition parties may well be pushing this to see if it can hurt Chiang
    and/or Carney. I'm concerned that Chiang may actually be serious. >>>>>
    Personally, many of us here are concerned about foreign powers
    manipulating our elections by helping candidates they favour and making
    it more difficult for candidates that they see as hostile to them. I >>>>> don't want our MPs chosen by the CCP, Putin or the USA!

    We had a major inquiry into this matter just a year or two back, >>>>> although I never heard a final report. I don't know if the inquiry is >>>>> still mulling things over or if the guilty parties have somehow kept it
    from reporting. Maybe I just missed the news when it came out.

    You're concerned he might seriously try to bounty-hunt his opponent? >>>>
    Seriously?

    Were you concerned that Sarah Palin was seriously planning to have a sniper
    shoot Democrat congressional candidates in the districts her website labeled
    with crosshairs?

    Ummm ...no?

    Well, most of the Democrat establishment certainly claimed to be after the Loughner shooting.

    The same "establishment" who claimed Dick Cheney didn't miss?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From moviePig@21:1/5 to All on Tue Apr 1 10:50:44 2025
    On 4/1/2025 12:53 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Mar 31, 2025 at 3:06:25 PM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 3/31/2025 5:25 PM, Rhino wrote:
    On 2025-03-31 5:02 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 3/31/2025 2:57 PM, Rhino wrote:
    On 2025-03-31 1:51 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
    Rhino <[email protected]> wrote:

    A Liberal MP made a very controversial statement recently that has him
    in hot water, at least with the opposition, during the current federal
    election.

    Paul Chiang, a sitting Liberal MP running for re-election, wrote a >>>>>>> comment in Chinese media, that his Conservative opponent, Joe Tay, a >>>>>>> city councillor, should be turned in to the Chinese consulate in >>>>>>> Toronto
    for a bounty. Tay is originally from Hong Kong where he ran afoul >>>>>>> of the
    local authorities for his anti-Beijing activism.

    https://vancouversun.com/news/federal_election/transnational-
    repression-jenny-kwan-weighs-in-on-liberal-mps-chinese-bounty-quip >>>>>>
    Liberals are apparently insisting that Chiang's remark was just a joke
    but the opposition parties, Conservative and NDP alike, are calling >>>>>>> for
    Chiang to step down and get replaced by another candidate. Mark >>>>>>> Carney,
    the new Liberal leader, has the power to dump candidates but is >>>>>>> resisting demands to dump Chiang.

    Given the media's love of Liberals, I'm expecting this story to die >>>>>>> quickly. I was surprised to learn that Chiang was a cop for 28 years. >>>>>>
    Ok. I'm a defender of the use of off-color jokes and bitter sarcasm in >>>>>> public speech to make a point, and condemn those who infer racist or >>>>>> hate speech, taking the remarks out of context.

    If he were contrasting Canada as a free society with China, he could >>>>>> have said that he'd be subject to arrest in China, but in Canada, he's >>>>>> perfectly free to run against an incumbant.

    But a bounty? I can't imagine a scenario in which that's funny. He >>>>>> needs
    to apologize. What a jerk.

    Proposing to turn in Tay to the Chinese, when his native Hong Kong >>>>> actually HAS a bounty on him of $153K for his pro-democracy activism >>>>> is pretty damned ominous in my opinion.

    Apparently Chiang *has* apologized and that's enough for Carney but >>>>> not for the opposition parties. I'm not sure it's enough for me
    either. The opposition parties may well be pushing this to see if it >>>>> can hurt Chiang and/or Carney. I'm concerned that Chiang may actually >>>>> be serious.

    Personally, many of us here are concerned about foreign powers
    manipulating our elections by helping candidates they favour and
    making it more difficult for candidates that they see as hostile to >>>>> them. I don't want our MPs chosen by the CCP, Putin or the USA!

    We had a major inquiry into this matter just a year or two back,
    although I never heard a final report. I don't know if the inquiry is >>>>> still mulling things over or if the guilty parties have somehow kept >>>>> it from reporting. Maybe I just missed the news when it came out.

    You're concerned he might seriously try to bounty-hunt his opponent? >>>>
    Seriously?


    Probably not personally but he was proposing that others in the
    "community" do so and there are a LOT of Chinese-Canadians in that area. >>> Some of them certainly have more loyalty to the CCP than Canada if their >>> participation if pro-China demonstrations are any guide.

    A reward of at least $183,000 gives anyone a lot of incentive to bring >>> Mr. Tay to the Chinese consulate or one of their secret police stations. >>
    Then I'll concede that it seems at least in clumsy bad taste ...though
    I'm surprised to hear that CCP loyalists abound in North America.

    Not only abound, but have some famous Americans among their ranks, not the least of which have the surname Biden.

    In trying to Google that, I encountered the following website:

    United States House Committee on Oversight and Accountability

    ( https://oversight.house.gov )

    Strange times...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BTR1701@21:1/5 to moviePig on Tue Apr 1 18:51:31 2025
    On Apr 1, 2025 at 7:53:53 AM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 4/1/2025 12:52 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Mar 31, 2025 at 2:55:42 PM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote: >>
    On 3/31/2025 5:13 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Mar 31, 2025 at 2:02:23 PM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 3/31/2025 2:57 PM, Rhino wrote:
    On 2025-03-31 1:51 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
    Rhino <[email protected]> wrote:

    A Liberal MP made a very controversial statement recently that has him
    in hot water, at least with the opposition, during the current federal
    election.

    Paul Chiang, a sitting Liberal MP running for re-election, wrote a
    comment in Chinese media, that his Conservative opponent, Joe Tay, a
    city councillor, should be turned in to the Chinese consulate in Toronto
    for a bounty. Tay is originally from Hong Kong where he ran afoul of the
    local authorities for his anti-Beijing activism.

    https://vancouversun.com/news/federal_election/transnational- >>>>>>>> repression-jenny-kwan-weighs-in-on-liberal-mps-chinese-bounty-quip

    Liberals are apparently insisting that Chiang's remark was just a joke
    but the opposition parties, Conservative and NDP alike, are calling for
    Chiang to step down and get replaced by another candidate. Mark Carney,
    the new Liberal leader, has the power to dump candidates but is >>>>>>>> resisting demands to dump Chiang.

    Given the media's love of Liberals, I'm expecting this story to die
    quickly. I was surprised to learn that Chiang was a cop for 28 years.

    Ok. I'm a defender of the use of off-color jokes and bitter sarcasm in
    public speech to make a point, and condemn those who infer racist or
    hate speech, taking the remarks out of context.

    If he were contrasting Canada as a free society with China, he could
    have said that he'd be subject to arrest in China, but in Canada, he's
    perfectly free to run against an incumbant.

    But a bounty? I can't imagine a scenario in which that's funny. He needs
    to apologize. What a jerk.

    Proposing to turn in Tay to the Chinese, when his native Hong Kong >>>>>> actually HAS a bounty on him of $153K for his pro-democracy activism is
    pretty damned ominous in my opinion.

    Apparently Chiang *has* apologized and that's enough for Carney but not
    for the opposition parties. I'm not sure it's enough for me either. The
    opposition parties may well be pushing this to see if it can hurt Chiang
    and/or Carney. I'm concerned that Chiang may actually be serious. >>>>>>
    Personally, many of us here are concerned about foreign powers >>>>>> manipulating our elections by helping candidates they favour and making
    it more difficult for candidates that they see as hostile to them. I
    don't want our MPs chosen by the CCP, Putin or the USA!

    We had a major inquiry into this matter just a year or two back, >>>>>> although I never heard a final report. I don't know if the inquiry is
    still mulling things over or if the guilty parties have somehow kept it
    from reporting. Maybe I just missed the news when it came out. >>>>>
    You're concerned he might seriously try to bounty-hunt his opponent? >>>>>
    Seriously?

    Were you concerned that Sarah Palin was seriously planning to have a >>>> sniper
    shoot Democrat congressional candidates in the districts her website >>>> labeled
    with crosshairs?

    Ummm ...no?

    Well, most of the Democrat establishment certainly claimed to be after the >> Loughner shooting.

    The same "establishment" who claimed Dick Cheney didn't miss?

    Perhaps. But even to this day, Democrats like Debbie Wasserman-Schultz claim Loughner was inspired by the bullseyes on Palin's website to commit his crime, despite all the independent law enforcement investigations into the incident showing that Loughner was not political in any way.

    So do you believe the Democrat mantra that "violent speech and imagery
    inspires violence against politicians" or are the Democrats full of shit?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From moviePig@21:1/5 to All on Tue Apr 1 16:03:17 2025
    On 4/1/2025 2:51 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Apr 1, 2025 at 7:53:53 AM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 4/1/2025 12:52 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Mar 31, 2025 at 2:55:42 PM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>
    On 3/31/2025 5:13 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Mar 31, 2025 at 2:02:23 PM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 3/31/2025 2:57 PM, Rhino wrote:
    On 2025-03-31 1:51 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
    Rhino <[email protected]> wrote:

    A Liberal MP made a very controversial statement recently that has him
    in hot water, at least with the opposition, during the current federal
    election.

    Paul Chiang, a sitting Liberal MP running for re-election, wrote a
    comment in Chinese media, that his Conservative opponent, Joe Tay, a
    city councillor, should be turned in to the Chinese consulate in Toronto
    for a bounty. Tay is originally from Hong Kong where he ran afoul of the
    local authorities for his anti-Beijing activism.

    https://vancouversun.com/news/federal_election/transnational- >>>>>>>>> repression-jenny-kwan-weighs-in-on-liberal-mps-chinese-bounty-quip

    Liberals are apparently insisting that Chiang's remark was just a joke
    but the opposition parties, Conservative and NDP alike, are calling for
    Chiang to step down and get replaced by another candidate. Mark Carney,
    the new Liberal leader, has the power to dump candidates but is >>>>>>>>> resisting demands to dump Chiang.

    Given the media's love of Liberals, I'm expecting this story to die
    quickly. I was surprised to learn that Chiang was a cop for 28 years.

    Ok. I'm a defender of the use of off-color jokes and bitter sarcasm in
    public speech to make a point, and condemn those who infer racist or
    hate speech, taking the remarks out of context.

    If he were contrasting Canada as a free society with China, he could
    have said that he'd be subject to arrest in China, but in Canada, he's
    perfectly free to run against an incumbant.

    But a bounty? I can't imagine a scenario in which that's funny. He needs
    to apologize. What a jerk.

    Proposing to turn in Tay to the Chinese, when his native Hong Kong
    actually HAS a bounty on him of $153K for his pro-democracy activism is
    pretty damned ominous in my opinion.

    Apparently Chiang *has* apologized and that's enough for Carney but not
    for the opposition parties. I'm not sure it's enough for me either. The
    opposition parties may well be pushing this to see if it can hurt Chiang
    and/or Carney. I'm concerned that Chiang may actually be serious. >>>>>>>
    Personally, many of us here are concerned about foreign powers >>>>>>> manipulating our elections by helping candidates they favour and making
    it more difficult for candidates that they see as hostile to them. I
    don't want our MPs chosen by the CCP, Putin or the USA!

    We had a major inquiry into this matter just a year or two back, >>>>>>> although I never heard a final report. I don't know if the inquiry is
    still mulling things over or if the guilty parties have somehow kept it
    from reporting. Maybe I just missed the news when it came out. >>>>>>
    You're concerned he might seriously try to bounty-hunt his opponent? >>>>>>
    Seriously?

    Were you concerned that Sarah Palin was seriously planning to have a >>>>> sniper
    shoot Democrat congressional candidates in the districts her website >>>>> labeled
    with crosshairs?

    Ummm ...no?

    Well, most of the Democrat establishment certainly claimed to be after the
    Loughner shooting.

    The same "establishment" who claimed Dick Cheney didn't miss?

    Perhaps. But even to this day, Democrats like Debbie Wasserman-Schultz claim Loughner was inspired by the bullseyes on Palin's website to commit his crime,
    despite all the independent law enforcement investigations into the incident showing that Loughner was not political in any way.

    So do you believe the Democrat mantra that "violent speech and imagery inspires violence against politicians" or are the Democrats full of shit?

    I believe that "violent speech and imagery against politicians" doesn't
    help, but that's it's far from being a critical factor (though I can't
    say the same for a general normalization of gunplay). Meanwhile, are
    you really asking if Democrats, like Republicans, are full of shit?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BTR1701@21:1/5 to moviePig on Tue Apr 1 21:36:16 2025
    On Apr 1, 2025 at 1:03:17 PM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 4/1/2025 2:51 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Apr 1, 2025 at 7:53:53 AM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 4/1/2025 12:52 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Mar 31, 2025 at 2:55:42 PM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 3/31/2025 5:13 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Mar 31, 2025 at 2:02:23 PM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote:

    On 3/31/2025 2:57 PM, Rhino wrote:
    On 2025-03-31 1:51 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
    Rhino <[email protected]> wrote:

    A Liberal MP made a very controversial statement recently that has him
    in hot water, at least with the opposition, during the current federal
    election.

    Paul Chiang, a sitting Liberal MP running for re-election, wrote a
    comment in Chinese media, that his Conservative opponent, Joe Tay, a
    city councillor, should be turned in to the Chinese consulate >>>>>>>>>> in Toronto
    for a bounty. Tay is originally from Hong Kong where he ran >>>>>>>>>> afoul of the
    local authorities for his anti-Beijing activism.

    https://vancouversun.com/news/federal_election/transnational- >>>>>>>>>> repression-jenny-kwan-weighs-in-on-liberal-mps-chinese-bounty-quip

    Liberals are apparently insisting that Chiang's remark was just a joke
    but the opposition parties, Conservative and NDP alike, are >>>>>>>>>> calling for
    Chiang to step down and get replaced by another candidate. >>>>>>>>>> Mark Carney,
    the new Liberal leader, has the power to dump candidates but is
    resisting demands to dump Chiang.

    Given the media's love of Liberals, I'm expecting this story to die
    quickly. I was surprised to learn that Chiang was a cop for 28 years.

    Ok. I'm a defender of the use of off-color jokes and bitter sarcasm in
    public speech to make a point, and condemn those who infer racist or
    hate speech, taking the remarks out of context.

    If he were contrasting Canada as a free society with China, he could
    have said that he'd be subject to arrest in China, but in Canada, he's
    perfectly free to run against an incumbant.

    But a bounty? I can't imagine a scenario in which that's >>>>>>>>> funny. He needs
    to apologize. What a jerk.

    Proposing to turn in Tay to the Chinese, when his native Hong Kong
    actually HAS a bounty on him of $153K for his pro-democracy >>>>>>>> activism is
    pretty damned ominous in my opinion.

    Apparently Chiang *has* apologized and that's enough for Carney >>>>>>>> but not
    for the opposition parties. I'm not sure it's enough for me >>>>>>>> either. The
    opposition parties may well be pushing this to see if it can >>>>>>>> hurt Chiang
    and/or Carney. I'm concerned that Chiang may actually be serious.

    Personally, many of us here are concerned about foreign powers >>>>>>>> manipulating our elections by helping candidates they favour >>>>>>>> and making
    it more difficult for candidates that they see as hostile to them. I
    don't want our MPs chosen by the CCP, Putin or the USA! >>>>>>>>
    We had a major inquiry into this matter just a year or two back,
    although I never heard a final report. I don't know if the inquiry is
    still mulling things over or if the guilty parties have somehow >>>>>>>> kept it
    from reporting. Maybe I just missed the news when it came out. >>>>>>>
    You're concerned he might seriously try to bounty-hunt his opponent?

    Seriously?

    Were you concerned that Sarah Palin was seriously planning to have a
    sniper
    shoot Democrat congressional candidates in the districts her website
    labeled
    with crosshairs?

    Ummm ...no?

    Well, most of the Democrat establishment certainly claimed to be after the
    Loughner shooting.

    The same "establishment" who claimed Dick Cheney didn't miss?

    Perhaps. But even to this day, Democrats like Debbie Wasserman-Schultz claim
    Loughner was inspired by the bullseyes on Palin's website to commit his
    crime,
    despite all the independent law enforcement investigations into the incident
    showing that Loughner was not political in any way.

    So do you believe the Democrat mantra that "violent speech and imagery
    inspires violence against politicians" or are the Democrats full of shit?

    I believe that "violent speech and imagery against politicians" doesn't
    help, but that's it's far from being a critical factor (though I can't
    say the same for a general normalization of gunplay). Meanwhile, are
    you really asking if Democrats, like Republicans, are full of shit?

    I *know* they're both full of shit. The jury is still out on you.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)