State TV in Sweden (SVT) has produced a big budget series called HISTORY OF SWEDEN.
This is who the government wants its people to believe were are the first Swedes:
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1903440799997796352/vid/avc1/1484x1080/zSkOkYQL6jojG3pq.mp4?tag=16
State TV in Sweden (SVT) has produced a big budget series called HISTORY OF >SWEDEN.
This is who the government wants its people to believe were are the first >Swedes:
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1903440799997796352/vid/avc1/1484x1080/zSkOkYQL6jojG3pq.mp4?tag=16
BTR1701 <[email protected]> wrote:
State TV in Sweden (SVT) has produced a big budget series called HISTORY OF >> SWEDEN.
This is who the government wants its people to believe were are the first
Swedes:
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1903440799997796352/vid/avc1/1484x1080/zSkOkYQL6jojG3pq.mp4?tag=16
No fucking way. Isn't the theory that as primitive man moved further and further north, skin pigmentation lightened? I've never read that skin
lighted after people moved into colder and colder climates.
I'm horrified that they weren't vegetarians.
On 3/22/2025 3:48 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
BTR1701 <[email protected]> wrote:
State TV in Sweden (SVT) has produced a big budget series called HISTORY OF
SWEDEN.
This is who the government wants its people to believe were are the first >>> Swedes:
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1903440799997796352/vid/avc1/1484x1080/zSkOkYQL6jojG3pq.mp4?tag=16
No fucking way. Isn't the theory that as primitive man moved further and
further north, skin pigmentation lightened? I've never read that skin
lighted after people moved into colder and colder climates.
I'm horrified that they weren't vegetarians.
They would be dark-skinned when they arrived, and evolve to
lighter-skinned to maintain Vitamin D levels despite reduced sunlight.
On Mar 22, 2025 at 1:19:42 PM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote:
On 3/22/2025 3:48 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
BTR1701 <[email protected]> wrote:
State TV in Sweden (SVT) has produced a big budget series called HISTORY OF
SWEDEN.
This is who the government wants its people to believe were are the first
Swedes:
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1903440799997796352/vid/avc1/1484x1080/zSkOkYQL6jojG3pq.mp4?tag=16
No fucking way. Isn't the theory that as primitive man moved further and >>> further north, skin pigmentation lightened? I've never read that skin
lighted after people moved into colder and colder climates.
I'm horrified that they weren't vegetarians.
They would be dark-skinned when they arrived, and evolve to
lighter-skinned to maintain Vitamin D levels despite reduced sunlight.
People didn't come directly from Africa to Scandinavia. They'd already evolved
lighter skin by living in Europe for centuries by the time they got to the high northern latitudes.
The early inhabitants of Sweden, dating back to the Bromme culture post-Ice Age (around 12,000 BC) and through the Neolithic and Iron Ages, were overwhelmingly of northern European descent-- hunter-gatherers, farmers, and later Norse populations with light skin, varied eye colors, and genetics tracing back to local European ancestry, not Africa. Genetic studies spanning 2,000 years (as detailed in ScienceDirect's research) show influences from the
eastern Baltic, British-Irish Isles, and southern Europe, but zero indication of direct African migration in Scandinavia during these periods.
On Mar 22, 2025 at 11:41:59 AM PDT, "BTR1701" <[email protected]> wrote:
State TV in Sweden (SVT) has produced a big budget series called HISTORY OF >> SWEDEN.
This is who the government wants its people to believe were are the first
Swedes:
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1903440799997796352/vid/avc1/1484x1080/zSkOkYQL6jojG3pq.mp4?tag=16
Sorry, accidentally hit 'send' too soon.
The SVT series "Historien om Sverige" doesn't just miss the mark—it obliterates any semblance of historical credibility by casting black actors as
early Swedes, a decision so detached from reality it's laughable. There's not a shred of archaeological, genetic, or historical evidence suggesting that sub-Saharan Africans ever set foot in ancient Sweden, let alone ruled it.
The early inhabitants of Sweden, dating back to the Bromme culture post-Ice Age (around 12,000 BC) and through the Neolithic and Iron Ages, were overwhelmingly of northern European descent-- hunter-gatherers, farmers, and later Norse populations with light skin, varied eye colors, and genetics tracing back to local European ancestry, not Africa. Genetic studies spanning 2,000 years (as detailed in ScienceDirect's research) show influences from the
eastern Baltic, British-Irish Isles, and southern Europe, but zero indication of African migration or rulership in Scandinavia during these periods.
This isn't creative license; it's historical malpractice done in service to pushing a modern political agenda. Portraying early Swedes as black is a deliberate erasure of the region's actual past, trading fact for feel-good fiction to appease contemporary diversity quotas.
On Mar 22, 2025 at 1:19:42 PM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote:
On 3/22/2025 3:48 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
BTR1701 <[email protected]> wrote:
State TV in Sweden (SVT) has produced a big budget series called HISTORY OF
SWEDEN.
This is who the government wants its people to believe were are the first
Swedes:
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1903440799997796352/vid/avc1/1484x1080/zSkOkYQL6jojG3pq.mp4?tag=16
No fucking way. Isn't the theory that as primitive man moved further and >>> further north, skin pigmentation lightened? I've never read that skin
lighted after people moved into colder and colder climates.
I'm horrified that they weren't vegetarians.
They would be dark-skinned when they arrived, and evolve to
lighter-skinned to maintain Vitamin D levels despite reduced sunlight.
People didn't come directly from Africa to Scandinavia. They'd already evolved
lighter skin by living in Europe for centuries by the time they got to the high northern latitudes.
The early inhabitants of Sweden, dating back to the Bromme culture post-Ice Age (around 12,000 BC) and through the Neolithic and Iron Ages, were overwhelmingly of northern European descent-- hunter-gatherers, farmers, and later Norse populations with light skin, varied eye colors, and genetics tracing back to local European ancestry, not Africa. Genetic studies spanning 2,000 years (as detailed in ScienceDirect's research) show influences from the
eastern Baltic, British-Irish Isles, and southern Europe, but zero indication of direct African migration in Scandinavia during these periods.
On 3/22/2025 5:41 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Mar 22, 2025 at 1:19:42 PM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote: >>
On 3/22/2025 3:48 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
BTR1701 <[email protected]> wrote:
State TV in Sweden (SVT) has produced a big budget series called
HISTORY OF
SWEDEN.
This is who the government wants its people to believe were are the first
Swedes:
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1903440799997796352/vid/avc1/1484x1080/zSkOkYQL6jojG3pq.mp4?tag=16
No fucking way. Isn't the theory that as primitive man moved further and
further north, skin pigmentation lightened? I've never read that skin >>>> lighted after people moved into colder and colder climates.
I'm horrified that they weren't vegetarians.
They would be dark-skinned when they arrived, and evolve to
lighter-skinned to maintain Vitamin D levels despite reduced sunlight.
People didn't come directly from Africa to Scandinavia. They'd already
evolved
lighter skin by living in Europe for centuries by the time they got to the >> high northern latitudes.
The early inhabitants of Sweden, dating back to the Bromme culture post-Ice >> Age (around 12,000 BC) and through the Neolithic and Iron Ages, were
overwhelmingly of northern European descent-- hunter-gatherers, farmers, and
later Norse populations with light skin, varied eye colors, and genetics
tracing back to local European ancestry, not Africa. Genetic studies
spanning
2,000 years (as detailed in ScienceDirect's research) show influences from >> the
eastern Baltic, British-Irish Isles, and southern Europe, but zero
indication
of direct African migration in Scandinavia during these periods.
Perhaps I should've said they would be *darker* skinned when they
arrived. And they would've stayed darker until the evolutionary
pressure (Vitamin D) worked its magic.
I don't know they'd have been as dark as those actors, and even less do
I know the motives of everyone behind this portrayal. Nevertheless,
afaics, they're supported by at least *some* scientific rationale.
. . .
It's no coincidence that the populace of indigenous white nations across the >globe are all suddenly being told that their countries and cultures were all >really black all along.
This is a coordinated politically-motivated agenda to erase white culture >everywhere it exists and pretend that white people are just some genetic >mistake that needs to be corrected.
On Mar 22, 2025 at 3:29:51 PM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote:
On 3/22/2025 5:41 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Mar 22, 2025 at 1:19:42 PM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>
On 3/22/2025 3:48 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:People didn't come directly from Africa to Scandinavia. They'd already >>> evolved
BTR1701 <[email protected]> wrote:
State TV in Sweden (SVT) has produced a big budget series called >>>>>> HISTORY OF
SWEDEN.
This is who the government wants its people to believe were are the first
Swedes:
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1903440799997796352/vid/avc1/1484x1080/zSkOkYQL6jojG3pq.mp4?tag=16
No fucking way. Isn't the theory that as primitive man moved further and
further north, skin pigmentation lightened? I've never read that skin >>>>> lighted after people moved into colder and colder climates.
I'm horrified that they weren't vegetarians.
They would be dark-skinned when they arrived, and evolve to
lighter-skinned to maintain Vitamin D levels despite reduced sunlight. >>>
lighter skin by living in Europe for centuries by the time they got to the
high northern latitudes.
The early inhabitants of Sweden, dating back to the Bromme culture post-Ice
Age (around 12,000 BC) and through the Neolithic and Iron Ages, were
overwhelmingly of northern European descent-- hunter-gatherers, farmers, and
later Norse populations with light skin, varied eye colors, and genetics >>> tracing back to local European ancestry, not Africa. Genetic studies
spanning
2,000 years (as detailed in ScienceDirect's research) show influences from
the
eastern Baltic, British-Irish Isles, and southern Europe, but zero
indication
of direct African migration in Scandinavia during these periods.
Perhaps I should've said they would be *darker* skinned when they
arrived. And they would've stayed darker until the evolutionary
pressure (Vitamin D) worked its magic.
I don't know they'd have been as dark as those actors, and even less do
I know the motives of everyone behind this portrayal. Nevertheless,
afaics, they're supported by at least *some* scientific rationale.
It's no coincidence that the populace of indigenous white nations across the globe are all suddenly being told that their countries and cultures were all really black all along.
This is a coordinated politically-motivated agenda to erase white culture everywhere it exists and pretend that white people are just some genetic mistake that needs to be corrected.
On 3/22/2025 11:41 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Mar 22, 2025 at 3:29:51 PM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote: >>
On 3/22/2025 5:41 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Mar 22, 2025 at 1:19:42 PM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote:
On 3/22/2025 3:48 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:People didn't come directly from Africa to Scandinavia. They'd already >>>> evolved
BTR1701 <[email protected]> wrote:
State TV in Sweden (SVT) has produced a big budget series called >>>>>>> HISTORY OF
SWEDEN.
This is who the government wants its people to believe were are >>>>>>> the first
Swedes:
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1903440799997796352/vid/avc1/1484x1080/zSkOkYQL6jojG3pq.mp4?tag=16
No fucking way. Isn't the theory that as primitive man moved further and
further north, skin pigmentation lightened? I've never read that skin
lighted after people moved into colder and colder climates.
I'm horrified that they weren't vegetarians.
They would be dark-skinned when they arrived, and evolve to
lighter-skinned to maintain Vitamin D levels despite reduced sunlight. >>>>
lighter skin by living in Europe for centuries by the time they got to the
high northern latitudes.
The early inhabitants of Sweden, dating back to the Bromme culture
post-Ice
Age (around 12,000 BC) and through the Neolithic and Iron Ages, were >>>> overwhelmingly of northern European descent-- hunter-gatherers,
farmers, and
later Norse populations with light skin, varied eye colors, and genetics
tracing back to local European ancestry, not Africa. Genetic studies >>>> spanning
2,000 years (as detailed in ScienceDirect's research) show influences from
the
eastern Baltic, British-Irish Isles, and southern Europe, but zero
indication
of direct African migration in Scandinavia during these periods.
Perhaps I should've said they would be *darker* skinned when they
arrived. And they would've stayed darker until the evolutionary
pressure (Vitamin D) worked its magic.
I don't know they'd have been as dark as those actors, and even less do >>> I know the motives of everyone behind this portrayal. Nevertheless,
afaics, they're supported by at least *some* scientific rationale.
It's no coincidence that the populace of indigenous white nations across the
globe are all suddenly being told that their countries and cultures were all
really black all along.
This is a coordinated politically-motivated agenda to erase white culture >> everywhere it exists and pretend that white people are just some genetic
mistake that needs to be corrected.
I'm wondering what (desirable) bits of 'white culture' are being erased.
On Mar 23, 2025 at 9:05:27 AM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote:
On 3/22/2025 11:41 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Mar 22, 2025 at 3:29:51 PM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>
On 3/22/2025 5:41 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Mar 22, 2025 at 1:19:42 PM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote:
On 3/22/2025 3:48 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
BTR1701 <[email protected]> wrote:
State TV in Sweden (SVT) has produced a big budget series called >>>>>>>> HISTORY OF
SWEDEN.
This is who the government wants its people to believe were are >>>>>>>> the first
Swedes:
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1903440799997796352/vid/avc1/1484x1080/zSkOkYQL6jojG3pq.mp4?tag=16
No fucking way. Isn't the theory that as primitive man moved further and
further north, skin pigmentation lightened? I've never read that skin
lighted after people moved into colder and colder climates. >>>>>>>
I'm horrified that they weren't vegetarians.
They would be dark-skinned when they arrived, and evolve to
lighter-skinned to maintain Vitamin D levels despite reduced sunlight.
People didn't come directly from Africa to Scandinavia. They'd already
evolved
lighter skin by living in Europe for centuries by the time they got to the
high northern latitudes.
The early inhabitants of Sweden, dating back to the Bromme culture >>>>> post-Ice
Age (around 12,000 BC) and through the Neolithic and Iron Ages, were >>>>> overwhelmingly of northern European descent-- hunter-gatherers,
farmers, and
later Norse populations with light skin, varied eye colors, and genetics
tracing back to local European ancestry, not Africa. Genetic studies >>>>> spanning
2,000 years (as detailed in ScienceDirect's research) show influences from
the
eastern Baltic, British-Irish Isles, and southern Europe, but zero >>>>> indication
of direct African migration in Scandinavia during these periods.
Perhaps I should've said they would be *darker* skinned when they
arrived. And they would've stayed darker until the evolutionary
pressure (Vitamin D) worked its magic.
I don't know they'd have been as dark as those actors, and even less do >>>> I know the motives of everyone behind this portrayal. Nevertheless, >>>> afaics, they're supported by at least *some* scientific rationale.
It's no coincidence that the populace of indigenous white nations across the
globe are all suddenly being told that their countries and cultures were all
really black all along.
This is a coordinated politically-motivated agenda to erase white culture >>> everywhere it exists and pretend that white people are just some genetic >>> mistake that needs to be corrected.
I'm wondering what (desirable) bits of 'white culture' are being erased.
I'm wondering what you find undesirable that's unique to white people.
On 3/23/2025 12:56 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Mar 23, 2025 at 9:05:27 AM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote: >>
On 3/22/2025 11:41 PM, BTR1701 wrote:I'm wondering what you find undesirable that's unique to white people.
On Mar 22, 2025 at 3:29:51 PM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote:
On 3/22/2025 5:41 PM, BTR1701 wrote:It's no coincidence that the populace of indigenous white nations
On Mar 22, 2025 at 1:19:42 PM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote:Perhaps I should've said they would be *darker* skinned when they >>>>> arrived. And they would've stayed darker until the evolutionary
On 3/22/2025 3:48 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
BTR1701 <[email protected]> wrote:
State TV in Sweden (SVT) has produced a big budget series called
HISTORY OF
SWEDEN.
This is who the government wants its people to believe were are
the first
Swedes:
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1903440799997796352/vid/avc1/1484x1080/zSkOkYQL6jojG3pq.mp4?tag=16
No fucking way. Isn't the theory that as primitive man moved >>>>>>>> further and
further north, skin pigmentation lightened? I've never read that skin
lighted after people moved into colder and colder climates. >>>>>>>>
I'm horrified that they weren't vegetarians.
They would be dark-skinned when they arrived, and evolve to >>>>>>> lighter-skinned to maintain Vitamin D levels despite reduced sunlight.
People didn't come directly from Africa to Scandinavia. They'd already
evolved
lighter skin by living in Europe for centuries by the time they got >>>>>> to the
high northern latitudes.
The early inhabitants of Sweden, dating back to the Bromme culture >>>>>> post-Ice
Age (around 12,000 BC) and through the Neolithic and Iron Ages, were
overwhelmingly of northern European descent-- hunter-gatherers, >>>>>> farmers, and
later Norse populations with light skin, varied eye colors, and genetics
tracing back to local European ancestry, not Africa. Genetic studies
spanning
2,000 years (as detailed in ScienceDirect's research) show
influences from
the
eastern Baltic, British-Irish Isles, and southern Europe, but zero >>>>>> indication
of direct African migration in Scandinavia during these periods. >>>>>
pressure (Vitamin D) worked its magic.
I don't know they'd have been as dark as those actors, and even less do
I know the motives of everyone behind this portrayal. Nevertheless, >>>>> afaics, they're supported by at least *some* scientific rationale. >>>>
across the
globe are all suddenly being told that their countries and cultures >>>> were all
really black all along.
This is a coordinated politically-motivated agenda to erase white culture
everywhere it exists and pretend that white people are just some genetic
mistake that needs to be corrected.
I'm wondering what (desirable) bits of 'white culture' are being erased. >>
What does your 'white culture' consist of ...that I can choose among?
On Mar 23, 2025 at 11:47:15 AM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote:
On 3/23/2025 12:56 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Mar 23, 2025 at 9:05:27 AM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>
On 3/22/2025 11:41 PM, BTR1701 wrote:I'm wondering what you find undesirable that's unique to white people.
On Mar 22, 2025 at 3:29:51 PM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote:
On 3/22/2025 5:41 PM, BTR1701 wrote:It's no coincidence that the populace of indigenous white nations >>>>> across the
On Mar 22, 2025 at 1:19:42 PM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]>Perhaps I should've said they would be *darker* skinned when they >>>>>> arrived. And they would've stayed darker until the evolutionary >>>>>> pressure (Vitamin D) worked its magic.
wrote:
On 3/22/2025 3:48 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
BTR1701 <[email protected]> wrote:
State TV in Sweden (SVT) has produced a big budget series called
HISTORY OF
SWEDEN.
This is who the government wants its people to believe were are
the first
Swedes:
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1903440799997796352/vid/avc1/1484x1080/zSkOkYQL6jojG3pq.mp4?tag=16
No fucking way. Isn't the theory that as primitive man moved >>>>>>>>> further and
further north, skin pigmentation lightened? I've never read that skin
lighted after people moved into colder and colder climates. >>>>>>>>>
I'm horrified that they weren't vegetarians.
They would be dark-skinned when they arrived, and evolve to >>>>>>>> lighter-skinned to maintain Vitamin D levels despite reduced sunlight.
People didn't come directly from Africa to Scandinavia. They'd already
evolved
lighter skin by living in Europe for centuries by the time they got
to the
high northern latitudes.
The early inhabitants of Sweden, dating back to the Bromme culture
post-Ice
Age (around 12,000 BC) and through the Neolithic and Iron Ages, were
overwhelmingly of northern European descent-- hunter-gatherers, >>>>>>> farmers, and
later Norse populations with light skin, varied eye colors, and genetics
tracing back to local European ancestry, not Africa. Genetic studies
spanning
2,000 years (as detailed in ScienceDirect's research) show >>>>>>> influences from
the
eastern Baltic, British-Irish Isles, and southern Europe, but zero
indication
of direct African migration in Scandinavia during these periods. >>>>>>
I don't know they'd have been as dark as those actors, and even less do
I know the motives of everyone behind this portrayal. Nevertheless, >>>>>> afaics, they're supported by at least *some* scientific rationale. >>>>>
globe are all suddenly being told that their countries and cultures >>>>> were all
really black all along.
This is a coordinated politically-motivated agenda to erase white culture
everywhere it exists and pretend that white people are just some genetic
mistake that needs to be corrected.
I'm wondering what (desirable) bits of 'white culture' are being erased. >>>
What does your 'white culture' consist of ...that I can choose among?
I think you've just shown us the root of your problem.
On 3/23/2025 3:21 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Mar 23, 2025 at 11:47:15 AM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote: >>
On 3/23/2025 12:56 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Mar 23, 2025 at 9:05:27 AM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote:What does your 'white culture' consist of ...that I can choose among?
On 3/22/2025 11:41 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Mar 22, 2025 at 3:29:51 PM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote:
On 3/22/2025 5:41 PM, BTR1701 wrote:It's no coincidence that the populace of indigenous white nations >>>>>> across the
On Mar 22, 2025 at 1:19:42 PM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]>
wrote:
On 3/22/2025 3:48 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
BTR1701 <[email protected]> wrote:
State TV in Sweden (SVT) has produced a big budget series called
HISTORY OF
SWEDEN.
This is who the government wants its people to believe were are
the first
Swedes:
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1903440799997796352/vid/avc1/1484x1080/zSkOkYQL6jojG3pq.mp4?tag=16
No fucking way. Isn't the theory that as primitive man moved
further and
further north, skin pigmentation lightened? I've never read >>>>>>>>>> that skin
lighted after people moved into colder and colder climates. >>>>>>>>>>
I'm horrified that they weren't vegetarians.
They would be dark-skinned when they arrived, and evolve to >>>>>>>>> lighter-skinned to maintain Vitamin D levels despite reduced sunlight.
People didn't come directly from Africa to Scandinavia. They'd already
evolved
lighter skin by living in Europe for centuries by the time they got
to the
high northern latitudes.
The early inhabitants of Sweden, dating back to the Bromme culture
post-Ice
Age (around 12,000 BC) and through the Neolithic and Iron Ages, were
overwhelmingly of northern European descent-- hunter-gatherers, >>>>>>>> farmers, and
later Norse populations with light skin, varied eye colors, and >>>>>>>> genetics
tracing back to local European ancestry, not Africa. Genetic studies
spanning
2,000 years (as detailed in ScienceDirect's research) show >>>>>>>> influences from
the
eastern Baltic, British-Irish Isles, and southern Europe, but zero
indication
of direct African migration in Scandinavia during these periods.
Perhaps I should've said they would be *darker* skinned when they >>>>>>> arrived. And they would've stayed darker until the evolutionary >>>>>>> pressure (Vitamin D) worked its magic.
I don't know they'd have been as dark as those actors, and even less do
I know the motives of everyone behind this portrayal. Nevertheless,
afaics, they're supported by at least *some* scientific rationale. >>>>>>
globe are all suddenly being told that their countries and cultures >>>>>> were all
really black all along.
This is a coordinated politically-motivated agenda to erase white >>>>>> culture
everywhere it exists and pretend that white people are just some genetic
mistake that needs to be corrected.
I'm wondering what (desirable) bits of 'white culture' are being erased.
I'm wondering what you find undesirable that's unique to white people. >>>
I think you've just shown us the root of your problem.
That I'm unsure what you meant by 'white culture'? Do elaborate...
On Mar 23, 2025 at 2:06:45 PM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote:
On 3/23/2025 3:21 PM, BTR1701 wrote:<[email protected]> wrote:
On Mar 23, 2025 at 11:47:15 AM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>
On 3/23/2025 12:56 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Mar 23, 2025 at 9:05:27 AM PDT, "moviePig"
believe were are
On 3/22/2025 11:41 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Mar 22, 2025 at 3:29:51 PM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote:
On 3/22/2025 5:41 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Mar 22, 2025 at 1:19:42 PM PDT, "moviePig" ><[email protected]>
wrote:
On 3/22/2025 3:48 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
BTR1701 <[email protected]> wrote:
State TV in Sweden (SVT) has produced a big budget >series called
HISTORY OF
SWEDEN.
This is who the government wants its people to
reduced sunlight.the first
Swedes:
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1903440799997796352/vid/avc1/1484x1080/zSkOkYQL6jojG3pq.mp4?tag=16
No fucking way. Isn't the theory that as primitive man moved
further and
further north, skin pigmentation lightened? I've never read
that skin
lighted after people moved into colder and colder climates.
I'm horrified that they weren't vegetarians.
They would be dark-skinned when they arrived, and evolve to >>>>>>>>>> lighter-skinned to maintain Vitamin D levels despite
time they got
People didn't come directly from Africa to Scandinavia. >They'd already
evolved
lighter skin by living in Europe for centuries by the
Bromme cultureto the
high northern latitudes.
The early inhabitants of Sweden, dating back to the
Iron Ages, werepost-Ice
Age (around 12,000 BC) and through the Neolithic and
Genetic studiesoverwhelmingly of northern European descent-- hunter-gatherers,
farmers, and
later Norse populations with light skin, varied eye colors, and
genetics
tracing back to local European ancestry, not Africa.
Europe, but zerospanning
2,000 years (as detailed in ScienceDirect's research) show >>>>>>>>> influences from
the
eastern Baltic, British-Irish Isles, and southern
even less doindication
of direct African migration in Scandinavia during these periods.
Perhaps I should've said they would be *darker* skinned when they >>>>>>>> arrived. And they would've stayed darker until the evolutionary >>>>>>>> pressure (Vitamin D) worked its magic.
I don't know they'd have been as dark as those actors, and
some geneticI know the motives of everyone behind this portrayal. >Nevertheless,
afaics, they're supported by at least *some* scientific rationale.
It's no coincidence that the populace of indigenous white nations >>>>>>> across the
globe are all suddenly being told that their countries and cultures
were all
really black all along.
This is a coordinated politically-motivated agenda to erase white >>>>>>> culture
everywhere it exists and pretend that white people are just
being erased.mistake that needs to be corrected.
I'm wondering what (desirable) bits of 'white culture' are
What does your 'white culture' consist of ...that I can choose among?
I'm wondering what you find undesirable that's unique to white people. >>>>
I think you've just shown us the root of your problem.
That I'm unsure what you meant by 'white culture'? Do elaborate...
That you can't think of a single example of white culture on your own.
On Mar 23, 2025 at 2:06:45 PM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote:
On 3/23/2025 3:21 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Mar 23, 2025 at 11:47:15 AM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote:
On 3/23/2025 12:56 PM, BTR1701 wrote:I think you've just shown us the root of your problem.
On Mar 23, 2025 at 9:05:27 AM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote:
On 3/22/2025 11:41 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Mar 22, 2025 at 3:29:51 PM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]>
wrote:
On 3/22/2025 5:41 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Mar 22, 2025 at 1:19:42 PM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]>
wrote:
On 3/22/2025 3:48 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
BTR1701 <[email protected]> wrote:
State TV in Sweden (SVT) has produced a big budget series called
HISTORY OF
SWEDEN.
This is who the government wants its people to believe were are
the first
Swedes:
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1903440799997796352/vid/avc1/1484x1080/zSkOkYQL6jojG3pq.mp4?tag=16
No fucking way. Isn't the theory that as primitive man moved
further and
further north, skin pigmentation lightened? I've never read
that skin
lighted after people moved into colder and colder climates.
I'm horrified that they weren't vegetarians.
They would be dark-skinned when they arrived, and evolve to >>>>>>>>>> lighter-skinned to maintain Vitamin D levels despite reduced sunlight.
People didn't come directly from Africa to Scandinavia. They'd already
evolved
lighter skin by living in Europe for centuries by the time they got
to the
high northern latitudes.
The early inhabitants of Sweden, dating back to the Bromme culture
post-Ice
Age (around 12,000 BC) and through the Neolithic and Iron Ages, were
overwhelmingly of northern European descent-- hunter-gatherers,
farmers, and
later Norse populations with light skin, varied eye colors, and
genetics
tracing back to local European ancestry, not Africa. Genetic studies
spanning
2,000 years (as detailed in ScienceDirect's research) show >>>>>>>>> influences from
the
eastern Baltic, British-Irish Isles, and southern Europe, but zero
indication
of direct African migration in Scandinavia during these periods.
Perhaps I should've said they would be *darker* skinned when they
arrived. And they would've stayed darker until the evolutionary >>>>>>>> pressure (Vitamin D) worked its magic.
I don't know they'd have been as dark as those actors, and even less do
I know the motives of everyone behind this portrayal. Nevertheless,
afaics, they're supported by at least *some* scientific rationale.
It's no coincidence that the populace of indigenous white nations >>>>>>> across the
globe are all suddenly being told that their countries and cultures
were all
really black all along.
This is a coordinated politically-motivated agenda to erase white >>>>>>> culture
everywhere it exists and pretend that white people are just some genetic
mistake that needs to be corrected.
I'm wondering what (desirable) bits of 'white culture' are being erased.
I'm wondering what you find undesirable that's unique to white people.
What does your 'white culture' consist of ...that I can choose among? >>>
That I'm unsure what you meant by 'white culture'? Do elaborate...
That you can't think of a single example of white culture on your own.
On 3/23/2025 5:20 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Mar 23, 2025 at 2:06:45 PM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote: >>
On 3/23/2025 3:21 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Mar 23, 2025 at 11:47:15 AM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote:
On 3/23/2025 12:56 PM, BTR1701 wrote:I think you've just shown us the root of your problem.
On Mar 23, 2025 at 9:05:27 AM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote:
On 3/22/2025 11:41 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Mar 22, 2025 at 3:29:51 PM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]>
wrote:
On 3/22/2025 5:41 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Mar 22, 2025 at 1:19:42 PM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]>
wrote:
On 3/22/2025 3:48 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
BTR1701 <[email protected]> wrote:They would be dark-skinned when they arrived, and evolve to
State TV in Sweden (SVT) has produced a big budget series called
HISTORY OF
SWEDEN.
This is who the government wants its people to believe were are
the first
Swedes:
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1903440799997796352/vid/avc1/1484x1080/zSkOkYQL6jojG3pq.mp4?tag=16
No fucking way. Isn't the theory that as primitive man moved
further and
further north, skin pigmentation lightened? I've never read
that skin
lighted after people moved into colder and colder climates.
I'm horrified that they weren't vegetarians. >>>>>>>>>>>
lighter-skinned to maintain Vitamin D levels despite >>>>>>>>>>> reduced sunlight.
People didn't come directly from Africa to Scandinavia. >>>>>>>>>> They'd already
evolved
lighter skin by living in Europe for centuries by the time they got
to the
high northern latitudes.
The early inhabitants of Sweden, dating back to the Bromme culture
post-Ice
Age (around 12,000 BC) and through the Neolithic and Iron Ages, were
overwhelmingly of northern European descent-- hunter-gatherers,
farmers, and
later Norse populations with light skin, varied eye colors, and
genetics
tracing back to local European ancestry, not Africa. Genetic studies
spanning
2,000 years (as detailed in ScienceDirect's research) show >>>>>>>>>> influences from
the
eastern Baltic, British-Irish Isles, and southern Europe, but zero
indication
of direct African migration in Scandinavia during these periods.
Perhaps I should've said they would be *darker* skinned when they
arrived. And they would've stayed darker until the evolutionary
pressure (Vitamin D) worked its magic.
I don't know they'd have been as dark as those actors, and >>>>>>>>> even less do
I know the motives of everyone behind this portrayal. Nevertheless,
afaics, they're supported by at least *some* scientific rationale.
It's no coincidence that the populace of indigenous white nations
across the
globe are all suddenly being told that their countries and cultures
were all
really black all along.
This is a coordinated politically-motivated agenda to erase white
culture
everywhere it exists and pretend that white people are just >>>>>>>> some genetic
mistake that needs to be corrected.
I'm wondering what (desirable) bits of 'white culture' are being erased.
I'm wondering what you find undesirable that's unique to white people.
What does your 'white culture' consist of ...that I can choose among? >>>>
That I'm unsure what you meant by 'white culture'? Do elaborate...
That you can't think of a single example of white culture on your own.
Iirc, I've hitherto never used the phrase or concept. You've introduced
it here. Please elucidate what you meant. Or don't.
On Mar 23, 2025 at 3:10:33 PM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote:
On 3/23/2025 5:20 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Mar 23, 2025 at 2:06:45 PM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>
On 3/23/2025 3:21 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Mar 23, 2025 at 11:47:15 AM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote:
On 3/23/2025 12:56 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Mar 23, 2025 at 9:05:27 AM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]>
wrote:
On 3/22/2025 11:41 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Mar 22, 2025 at 3:29:51 PM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]>
wrote:
On 3/22/2025 5:41 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Mar 22, 2025 at 1:19:42 PM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]>
wrote:
On 3/22/2025 3:48 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> BTR1701 <[email protected]> wrote:
They would be dark-skinned when they arrived, and evolve to
State TV in Sweden (SVT) has produced a big budget series called
HISTORY OF
SWEDEN.
This is who the government wants its people to believe were are
the first
Swedes:
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1903440799997796352/vid/avc1/1484x1080/zSkOkYQL6jojG3pq.mp4?tag=16
No fucking way. Isn't the theory that as primitive man moved
further and
further north, skin pigmentation lightened? I've never read
that skin
lighted after people moved into colder and colder climates.
I'm horrified that they weren't vegetarians. >>>>>>>>>>>>
lighter-skinned to maintain Vitamin D levels despite >>>>>>>>>>>> reduced sunlight.
People didn't come directly from Africa to Scandinavia. >>>>>>>>>>> They'd already
evolved
lighter skin by living in Europe for centuries by the time they got
to the
high northern latitudes.
The early inhabitants of Sweden, dating back to the Bromme culture
post-Ice
Age (around 12,000 BC) and through the Neolithic and Iron Ages, were
overwhelmingly of northern European descent-- hunter-gatherers,
farmers, and
later Norse populations with light skin, varied eye colors, and
genetics
tracing back to local European ancestry, not Africa. Genetic studies
spanning
2,000 years (as detailed in ScienceDirect's research) show
influences from
the
eastern Baltic, British-Irish Isles, and southern Europe, but zero
indication
of direct African migration in Scandinavia during these periods.
Perhaps I should've said they would be *darker* skinned when they
arrived. And they would've stayed darker until the evolutionary
pressure (Vitamin D) worked its magic.
I don't know they'd have been as dark as those actors, and >>>>>>>>>> even less do
I know the motives of everyone behind this portrayal. Nevertheless,
afaics, they're supported by at least *some* scientific rationale.
It's no coincidence that the populace of indigenous white nations
across the
globe are all suddenly being told that their countries and cultures
were all
really black all along.
This is a coordinated politically-motivated agenda to erase white
culture
everywhere it exists and pretend that white people are just >>>>>>>>> some genetic
mistake that needs to be corrected.
I'm wondering what (desirable) bits of 'white culture' are being erased.
I'm wondering what you find undesirable that's unique to white people.
What does your 'white culture' consist of ...that I can choose among?
I think you've just shown us the root of your problem.
That I'm unsure what you meant by 'white culture'? Do elaborate...
That you can't think of a single example of white culture on your own.
Iirc, I've hitherto never used the phrase or concept. You've introduced
it here. Please elucidate what you meant. Or don't.
I think I won't because you'd either have to be a moron or playing games not to be able to think of one example of white culture on your own, and since I know you're not a moron, I'll decline to play your game.
On Mar 23, 2025 at 3:10:33 PM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote:
On 3/23/2025 5:20 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Mar 23, 2025 at 2:06:45 PM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>
On 3/23/2025 3:21 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Mar 23, 2025 at 11:47:15 AM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote:
On 3/23/2025 12:56 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Mar 23, 2025 at 9:05:27 AM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]>
wrote:
On 3/22/2025 11:41 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Mar 22, 2025 at 3:29:51 PM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]>
wrote:
On 3/22/2025 5:41 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Mar 22, 2025 at 1:19:42 PM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]>
wrote:
On 3/22/2025 3:48 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> BTR1701 <[email protected]> wrote:
They would be dark-skinned when they arrived, and evolve to
State TV in Sweden (SVT) has produced a big budget series called
HISTORY OF
SWEDEN.
This is who the government wants its people to believe were are
the first
Swedes:
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1903440799997796352/vid/avc1/1484x1080/zSkOkYQL6jojG3pq.mp4?tag=16
No fucking way. Isn't the theory that as primitive man moved
further and
further north, skin pigmentation lightened? I've never read
that skin
lighted after people moved into colder and colder climates.
I'm horrified that they weren't vegetarians. >>>>>>>>>>>>
lighter-skinned to maintain Vitamin D levels despite >>>>>>>>>>>> reduced sunlight.
People didn't come directly from Africa to Scandinavia. >>>>>>>>>>> They'd already
evolved
lighter skin by living in Europe for centuries by the time they got
to the
high northern latitudes.
The early inhabitants of Sweden, dating back to the Bromme culture
post-Ice
Age (around 12,000 BC) and through the Neolithic and Iron >>>>>>>>>>> Ages, were
overwhelmingly of northern European descent-- hunter-gatherers,
farmers, and
later Norse populations with light skin, varied eye colors, and
genetics
tracing back to local European ancestry, not Africa. >>>>>>>>>>> Genetic studies
spanning
2,000 years (as detailed in ScienceDirect's research) show
influences from
the
eastern Baltic, British-Irish Isles, and southern Europe, but zero
indication
of direct African migration in Scandinavia during these periods.
Perhaps I should've said they would be *darker* skinned when they
arrived. And they would've stayed darker until the evolutionary
pressure (Vitamin D) worked its magic.
I don't know they'd have been as dark as those actors, and >>>>>>>>>> even less do
I know the motives of everyone behind this portrayal. Nevertheless,
afaics, they're supported by at least *some* scientific rationale.
It's no coincidence that the populace of indigenous white nations
across the
globe are all suddenly being told that their countries and cultures
were all
really black all along.
This is a coordinated politically-motivated agenda to erase white
culture
everywhere it exists and pretend that white people are just >>>>>>>>> some genetic
mistake that needs to be corrected.
I'm wondering what (desirable) bits of 'white culture' are being >>>>>>>> erased.
I'm wondering what you find undesirable that's unique to white people.
What does your 'white culture' consist of ...that I can choose among?
I think you've just shown us the root of your problem.
That I'm unsure what you meant by 'white culture'? Do elaborate...
That you can't think of a single example of white culture on your own.
Iirc, I've hitherto never used the phrase or concept. You've introduced
it here. Please elucidate what you meant. Or don't.
I think I won't because you'd either have to be a moron or playing games not to be able to think of one example of white culture on your own, and since I know you're not a moron, I'll decline to play your game.
On 3/22/2025 3:48 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
BTR1701 <[email protected]> wrote:
State TV in Sweden (SVT) has produced a big budget series called HISTORY OF >>> SWEDEN.
This is who the government wants its people to believe were are the first >>> Swedes:
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1903440799997796352/vid/avc1/1484x1080/zSkOkYQL6jojG3pq.mp4?tag=16
No fucking way. Isn't the theory that as primitive man moved further and
further north, skin pigmentation lightened? I've never read that skin
lighted after people moved into colder and colder climates.
I'm horrified that they weren't vegetarians.
They would be dark-skinned when they arrived, and evolve to
lighter-skinned to maintain Vitamin D levels despite reduced sunlight.
On 2025-03-22 20:19:42 +0000, moviePig said:
On 3/22/2025 3:48 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
BTR1701 <[email protected]> wrote:
State TV in Sweden (SVT) has produced a big budget series called
HISTORY OF
SWEDEN.
This is who the government wants its people to believe were are the
first
Swedes:
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1903440799997796352/vid/
avc1/1484x1080/zSkOkYQL6jojG3pq.mp4?tag=16
No fucking way. Isn't the theory that as primitive man moved further and >>> further north, skin pigmentation lightened? I've never read that skin
lighted after people moved into colder and colder climates.
I'm horrified that they weren't vegetarians.
They would be dark-skinned when they arrived, and evolve to lighter-
skinned to maintain Vitamin D levels despite reduced sunlight.
The first swede was a turnip that had a genetic issue. ;-)
On Mar 23, 2025 at 4:20:12 PM PDT, "BTR1701" <[email protected]> wrote:
On Mar 23, 2025 at 3:10:33 PM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote:
On 3/23/2025 5:20 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Mar 23, 2025 at 2:06:45 PM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> wrote:Iirc, I've hitherto never used the phrase or concept. You've introduced >>> it here. Please elucidate what you meant. Or don't.
On 3/23/2025 3:21 PM, BTR1701 wrote:That you can't think of a single example of white culture on your own. >>>
On Mar 23, 2025 at 11:47:15 AM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote:
On 3/23/2025 12:56 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Mar 23, 2025 at 9:05:27 AM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]>
wrote:
On 3/22/2025 11:41 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Mar 22, 2025 at 3:29:51 PM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]>
wrote:
On 3/22/2025 5:41 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Mar 22, 2025 at 1:19:42 PM PDT, "moviePig" <[email protected]>
wrote:
On 3/22/2025 3:48 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> BTR1701 <[email protected]> wrote:
They would be dark-skinned when they arrived, and evolve to
State TV in Sweden (SVT) has produced a big budget series called
HISTORY OF
SWEDEN.
This is who the government wants its people to believe were are
the first
Swedes:
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1903440799997796352/vid/avc1/1484x1080/zSkOkYQL6jojG3pq.mp4?tag=16
No fucking way. Isn't the theory that as primitive man moved
further and
further north, skin pigmentation lightened? I've never read
that skin
lighted after people moved into colder and colder climates.
I'm horrified that they weren't vegetarians. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
lighter-skinned to maintain Vitamin D levels despite >>>>>>>>>>>>> reduced sunlight.
People didn't come directly from Africa to Scandinavia. >>>>>>>>>>>> They'd already
evolved
lighter skin by living in Europe for centuries by the time they got
to the
high northern latitudes.
The early inhabitants of Sweden, dating back to the Bromme culture
post-Ice
Age (around 12,000 BC) and through the Neolithic and Iron
Ages, were
overwhelmingly of northern European descent-- hunter-gatherers,
farmers, and
later Norse populations with light skin, varied eye colors, and
genetics
tracing back to local European ancestry, not Africa. >>>>>>>>>>>> Genetic studies
spanning
2,000 years (as detailed in ScienceDirect's research) show
influences from
the
eastern Baltic, British-Irish Isles, and southern Europe, but zero
indication
of direct African migration in Scandinavia during these periods.
Perhaps I should've said they would be *darker* skinned when they
arrived. And they would've stayed darker until the evolutionary
pressure (Vitamin D) worked its magic.
I don't know they'd have been as dark as those actors, and >>>>>>>>>>> even less do
I know the motives of everyone behind this portrayal. Nevertheless,
afaics, they're supported by at least *some* scientific rationale.
It's no coincidence that the populace of indigenous white nations
across the
globe are all suddenly being told that their countries and cultures
were all
really black all along.
This is a coordinated politically-motivated agenda to erase white
culture
everywhere it exists and pretend that white people are just >>>>>>>>>> some genetic
mistake that needs to be corrected.
I'm wondering what (desirable) bits of 'white culture' are being
erased.
I'm wondering what you find undesirable that's unique to white people.
What does your 'white culture' consist of ...that I can choose among?
I think you've just shown us the root of your problem.
That I'm unsure what you meant by 'white culture'? Do elaborate... >>>>
I think I won't because you'd either have to be a moron or playing games not >> to be able to think of one example of white culture on your own, and since I >> know you're not a moron, I'll decline to play your game.
I'd bet my pension that if someone asked you to name an example of black culture, you wouldn't give them the same, "What? I've never even considered the concept before. I have no idea what you mean. Can you help me out here, 'cause I'm at a loss."
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 715 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 00:21:55 |
| Calls: | 12,097 |
| Calls today: | 5 |
| Files: | 15,003 |
| Messages: | 6,517,858 |