• Joy Behar Trashes "Foreign Agent" Elon Musk, Claims He's "Pro-Apartheid

    From Ubiquitous@21:1/5 to All on Sun Mar 2 16:25:41 2025
    XPost: alt.tv.the-view

    Joy Behar trashed billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk during Thursday�s broadcast of �The View,� claiming that he was a �foreign agent� and was �pro-apartheid� and asserting that he was effectively running the
    federal government while President Donald Trump took �a nap.�

    Behar and her cohosts on the ABC News talk show have been critical of
    both Trump and Musk since before the inauguration � often suggesting
    that the latter is actually the one in charge and directing things from
    the sidelines � but on Thursday�s show, Behar took things a step
    further.

    �Elon Musk kisses [Trump�s] butt and strokes his tiny ego, or big ego,
    whatever it is,� Behar began, prompting a smattering of laughter from
    the audience. �And he doesn�t get to do � he can take a nap while the
    guy, who was not born in this country, who was born under apartheid in
    South Africa, so has that mentality going on. He was pro-apartheid, as
    I understand it ��

    �He is a naturalized citizen,� cohost Alyssa Farah Griffin pointed out.

    �He�s a naturalized citizen,� Behar repeated. �Oh, how did he do that?
    Did he come over the border legally?�

    Griffin said she believed he�d come to the United States on an H1B
    Visa, and cohost Sunny Hostin jumped in then to claim that he�d
    overstayed that visa, suggesting that made him an illegal immigrant.

    �This is just perfectly wonderful for Trump,� Behar pivoted back to her original point. �He can take a nap and let this foreigner, foreign
    agent, you know, an enemy of the United States, do his job.�

    Cohost Whoopi Goldberg asked whether anyone else wanted to address the
    topic, and there was a brief pause before Griffin suggested that maybe
    they should �give him a little bit of time� before labeling Musk �an
    enemy of the United States.�

    Fox News commentator Guy Benson pushed back on Behar�s comments,
    saying, �When it�s illegal immigrants, they chant that we are a nation
    of immigrants. When it�s a naturalized citizen they don�t like, this
    ugly nativism rears its head.�

    �At some point, @ABC is going to get sued for something these morons
    say. This may be it,� Pradheep Shanker added.


    Perhaps with an eye toward just such a lawsuit, Behar scrambled to
    water down her claims when the show returned from a commercial break.

    �I don�t really know for sure if he was [pro-apartheid]. He grew up in
    that time when [it] was in full blown � He was around at that time.
    Maybe he was, maybe he wasn�t � don�t be suing me, okay, Elon?� Behar
    said.

    --
    Not a joke! Don't jump!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BTR1701@21:1/5 to Ubiquitous on Sun Mar 2 21:49:48 2025
    XPost: alt.tv.the-view

    On Mar 2, 2025 at 1:25:41 PM PST, "Ubiquitous" <[email protected]> wrote:

    Joy Behar trashed billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk during Thursday's broadcast of THE VIEW, claiming that he was a "foreign agent" and was "pro-apartheid" and asserting that he was effectively running the
    federal government while President Donald Trump took "a nap".

    But you had no problem with Jill Biden running the country for four years-- even leading Cabinet meetings-- while Grandpa Badfinger gummed his pudding and watched the squirrels on the South Lawn, right Joy?

    "Elon Musk kisses [Trump’s] butt and strokes his tiny ego, or big ego, whatever it is," Behar began, prompting a smattering of laughter from
    the audience. "And he doesn’t get to do-- he can take a nap while the
    guy, who was not born in this country who was born under apartheid in
    South Africa, so has that mentality going on. He was pro-apartheid, as
    I understand it--"

    So any white person born in South Africa is de facto pro-apartheid? Every
    white person has "that mentality going on"? Jeezus, Joy. You certainly are letting your bigot flag fly this week, aren't you?

    "He is a naturalized citizen," cohost Alyssa Farah Griffin pointed out.

    "He’s a naturalized citizen," Behar repeated. "Oh, how did he do that?
    Did he come over the border legally?"

    Yes, you disgusting fishwife, he did.

    "This is just perfectly wonderful for Trump," Behar pivoted back to her original point. "He can take a nap and let this foreigner, foreign
    agent, you know, an enemy of the United States, do his job."

    Fox News commentator Guy Benson pushed back on Behar's comments,
    saying, "When it’s illegal aliens, they chant that we are a nation
    of immigrants. When it's a naturalized citizen they don't like, this
    ugly nativism rears its head."

    Bingo. The hypocrisy is so blatant it's amazing that those smooth-brained harridans believe they're fooling anyone.

    "At some point, @ABC is going to get sued for something these morons
    say. This may be it," Pradheep Shanker added.

    Perhaps with an eye toward just such a lawsuit, Behar scrambled to
    water down her claims when the show returned from a commercial break.

    "I don’t really know for sure if he was [pro-apartheid].

    You don't know for sure but you were perfectly comfortable accusing him of it. Fuck off, you appalling hag.

    He grew up in that time when [it] was in full blown... He was around at that time.
    Maybe he was, maybe he wasn't... don't be suing me, okay, Elon?" Behar
    said.

    He should sue the shit out of her and take everything she owns.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ubiquitous@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Mon Mar 3 15:22:30 2025
    XPost: alt.tv.the-view

    In article <vq2jps$umv9$[email protected]>, [email protected] wrote:
    "Ubiquitous" <[email protected]> wrote:

    Joy Behar trashed billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk during Thursday's
    broadcast of THE VIEW, claiming that he was a "foreign agent" and was
    "pro-apartheid" and asserting that he was effectively running the
    federal government while President Donald Trump took "a nap".

    But you had no problem with Jill Biden running the country for four years-- >even leading Cabinet meetings-- while Grandpa Badfinger gummed his pudding >and watched the squirrels on the South Lawn, right Joy?

    "But that's `different`!".

    "Elon Musk kisses [Trump's] butt and strokes his tiny ego, or big ego,
    whatever it is," Behar began, prompting a smattering of laughter from
    the audience. "And he doesn't get to do-- he can take a nap while the
    guy, who was not born in this country who was born under apartheid in
    South Africa, so has that mentality going on. He was pro-apartheid, as
    I understand it--"

    So any white person born in South Africa is de facto pro-apartheid? Every >white person has "that mentality going on"? Jeezus, Joy. You certainly are >letting your bigot flag fly this week, aren't you?

    I am pretty sure this actually qualifies as "racism".

    --
    Not a joke! Don't jump!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BTR1701@21:1/5 to Ubiquitous on Thu Mar 13 22:06:00 2025
    XPost: alt.tv.the-view

    On Mar 3, 2025 at 1:22:30 PM PST, "Ubiquitous" <[email protected]> wrote:

    In article <vq2jps$umv9$[email protected]>, [email protected] wrote:
    "Ubiquitous" <[email protected]> wrote:

    Joy Behar trashed billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk during Thursday's
    broadcast of THE VIEW, claiming that he was a "foreign agent" and was
    "pro-apartheid" and asserting that he was effectively running the
    federal government while President Donald Trump took "a nap".

    But you had no problem with Jill Biden running the country for four years-- >> even leading Cabinet meetings-- while Grandpa Badfinger gummed his pudding >> and watched the squirrels on the South Lawn, right Joy?

    "But that's `different`!".

    "Elon Musk kisses [Trump's] butt and strokes his tiny ego, or big ego,
    whatever it is," Behar began, prompting a smattering of laughter from
    the audience. "And he doesn't get to do-- he can take a nap while the
    guy, who was not born in this country who was born under apartheid in
    South Africa, so has that mentality going on. He was pro-apartheid, as
    I understand it--"

    So any white person born in South Africa is de facto pro-apartheid? Every
    white person has "that mentality going on"? Jeezus, Joy. You certainly are >> letting your bigot flag fly this week, aren't you?

    I am pretty sure this actually qualifies as "racism".

    Her issue with Musk is apparently that he wasn't born in America. Of course this is Left's hypocrisy on full display: full acceptance of open borders for those who will flood the country and reshape the electorate, but hostility toward legal immigrants-- especially those of the hwite kind-- who champion free speech, innovation, and American strength.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dimensional Traveler@21:1/5 to Adam H. Kerman on Thu Mar 13 18:02:16 2025
    On 3/13/2025 5:42 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
    BTR1701 <[email protected]> wrote:

    . . .

    [Joy Behar]

    Her issue with Musk is apparently that he wasn't born in America.

    He's African-American!

    Just like Charlize Theron!

    --
    I've done good in this world. Now I'm tired and just want to be a cranky
    dirty old man.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Adam H. Kerman@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Fri Mar 14 00:42:05 2025
    BTR1701 <[email protected]> wrote:

    . . .

    [Joy Behar]

    Her issue with Musk is apparently that he wasn't born in America.

    He's African-American!

    Of course
    this is Left's hypocrisy on full display: full acceptance of open borders for >those who will flood the country and reshape the electorate, but hostility >toward legal immigrants-- especially those of the hwite kind-- who champion >free speech, innovation, and American strength.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Horny Goat@21:1/5 to All on Tue Mar 25 01:19:13 2025
    On Sun, 02 Mar 2025 16:25:41 -0500, Ubiquitous <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    �I don�t really know for sure if he was [pro-apartheid]. He grew up in
    that time when [it] was in full blown � He was around at that time.
    Maybe he was, maybe he wasn�t � don�t be suing me, okay, Elon?� Behar
    said.

    At least she didn't get confused and call him a Canadian which is a
    citizenship he's entitled to claim (but hasn't) since his mother was a
    Canadian whose father movied his family to South Africa to pursue his
    racial views which were much more sympathetic to the apartheid view of
    things than your average mainstream Canadian view.

    And yes I >DO< think Behar is often as confused as that...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From anim8rfsk@21:1/5 to The Horny Goat on Tue Mar 25 13:32:37 2025
    The Horny Goat <[email protected]> wrote:
    On Sun, 02 Mar 2025 16:25:41 -0500, Ubiquitous <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    “I don’t really know for sure if he was [pro-apartheid]. He grew up in
    that time when [it] was in full blown … He was around at that time.
    Maybe he was, maybe he wasn’t … don’t be suing me, okay, Elon?” Behar
    said.

    At least she didn't get confused and call him a Canadian which is a citizenship he's entitled to claim (but hasn't) since his mother was a Canadian whose father movied his family to South Africa to pursue his
    racial views which were much more sympathetic to the apartheid view of
    things than your average mainstream Canadian view.

    And yes I >DO< think Behar is often as confused as that...


    I don’t think Behar gets confused. I think she’s just a liar.

    --
    The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ubiquitous@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Tue Mar 25 21:34:56 2025
    XPost: alt.tv.the-view

    [email protected] wrote:
    The Horny Goat <[email protected]> wrote:
    Ubiquitous <[email protected]> wrote:

    “I don’t really know for sure if he was [pro-apartheid]. He grew up in >>> that time when [it] was in full blown … He was around at that time.
    Maybe he was, maybe he wasn’t … don’t be suing me, okay, Elon?” Behar >>> said.

    At least she didn't get confused and call him a Canadian which is a
    citizenship he's entitled to claim (but hasn't) since his mother was a
    Canadian whose father movied his family to South Africa to pursue his
    racial views which were much more sympathetic to the apartheid view of
    things than your average mainstream Canadian view.

    And yes I >DO< think Behar is often as confused as that...

    I don't think Behar gets confused. I think she’s just a liar.

    I think she's just stupid.

    --
    Dems & the media want Trump to be more like Obama, but then he'd
    have to audit liberals & wire tap reporters' phones.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Horny Goat@21:1/5 to All on Mon Apr 28 11:38:28 2025
    On Tue, 25 Mar 2025 21:34:56 -0400, Ubiquitous <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    And yes I >DO< think Behar is often as confused as that...

    I don't think Behar gets confused. I think she’s just a liar.

    I think she's just stupid.

    With all due respect "confused", "liar", "stupid" are not mutually
    exclusive <grin>

    Unless I'm horribly mistaken Donald Trump is about to elect the next
    prime minister of Canada - public opinion polls gave a 20 point lead
    to one party before Trump launched into Canadian politics with the
    other party having a 4-5 point lead in the polls today - which is
    election day in Canada.

    What Trump said was as good as an endorsement which is not something
    political leaders should be doing in countries other than their own.

    I'll be watching in 7 1/2 hours when the polls close...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rhino@21:1/5 to The Horny Goat on Mon Apr 28 14:48:16 2025
    On 2025-04-28 2:38 PM, The Horny Goat wrote:
    On Tue, 25 Mar 2025 21:34:56 -0400, Ubiquitous <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    And yes I >DO< think Behar is often as confused as that...

    I don't think Behar gets confused. I think she’s just a liar.

    I think she's just stupid.

    With all due respect "confused", "liar", "stupid" are not mutually
    exclusive <grin>

    Unless I'm horribly mistaken Donald Trump is about to elect the next
    prime minister of Canada - public opinion polls gave a 20 point lead
    to one party before Trump launched into Canadian politics with the
    other party having a 4-5 point lead in the polls today - which is
    election day in Canada.

    What Trump said was as good as an endorsement which is not something political leaders should be doing in countries other than their own.

    I'll be watching in 7 1/2 hours when the polls close...

    I hereby predict that if Carney manages to win, he will never be
    re-elected. It's very clear to me that he's just Trudeau with a resume
    and that this will soon become apparent to everyone else. Carney is also
    a frequent liar. His arrogance is off the charts, which is obvious every
    time he has to answer a hard question from the media: he oozes contempt
    for them. I think his only motivation for wanting the job is the
    prospect of all the money his company, Brookfield, can get from
    government contracts.

    If Carney fails to win, I think he'll be gone in very short order. I
    just don't see him wasting time as an opposition leader when he could be
    making much more money in the private sector.

    --
    Rhino

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From anim8rfsk@21:1/5 to The Horny Goat on Tue Apr 29 10:08:03 2025
    The Horny Goat <[email protected]> wrote:
    On Tue, 25 Mar 2025 21:34:56 -0400, Ubiquitous <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    And yes I >DO< think Behar is often as confused as that...

    I don't think Behar gets confused. I think she’s just a liar.

    I think she's just stupid.

    With all due respect "confused", "liar", "stupid" are not mutually
    exclusive <grin>

    AOC certainly proves your point.



    --
    The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Horny Goat@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Wed May 28 10:26:04 2025
    On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 14:48:16 -0400, Rhino
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    I hereby predict that if Carney manages to win, he will never be
    re-elected. It's very clear to me that he's just Trudeau with a resume
    and that this will soon become apparent to everyone else. Carney is also
    a frequent liar. His arrogance is off the charts, which is obvious every
    time he has to answer a hard question from the media: he oozes contempt
    for them. I think his only motivation for wanting the job is the
    prospect of all the money his company, Brookfield, can get from
    government contracts.

    It should be noted that the chief reason Carney's main rival was
    defeated in the recent Canadian election was that his electoral
    district was targetted by proportional representation advocates whose
    tactic was to register 90+ "candidates" whose names were placed on the
    ballot in Poilevre's electoral district.

    Apparently the ballot in Poilevre's district was more than 3 feet long
    and it's believed many voters were confused even though party
    affiliation is shown on Canadian ballots. (It wasn't always and I
    remember the election when I was in my early teens and there were two candidates in our district with the same surname and that that evening
    when the results were on TV my mother was quite distressed to find she
    had mis-remembered and inadvertently voted Communist....)

    I don't know how you could legally prevent this though Canada does
    have a requirement that candidates file a deposit when filing their
    nomination papers. This deposit is refunded if the candidate gets more
    than a certain percentage (25%? 50%?) of the votes cast for the
    winning candidate. I heard about this years ago when my late
    grandfather was a federal candidate for one of the major parties but
    that was in the 1960s. I know the deposit requirement is still in the
    elections act but have no idea the amount currently. It's high enough
    to discourage most of the nutbars but not serious candidates.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rhino@21:1/5 to The Horny Goat on Wed May 28 14:44:36 2025
    On 2025-05-28 1:26 PM, The Horny Goat wrote:
    On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 14:48:16 -0400, Rhino
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    I hereby predict that if Carney manages to win, he will never be
    re-elected. It's very clear to me that he's just Trudeau with a resume
    and that this will soon become apparent to everyone else. Carney is also
    a frequent liar. His arrogance is off the charts, which is obvious every
    time he has to answer a hard question from the media: he oozes contempt
    for them. I think his only motivation for wanting the job is the
    prospect of all the money his company, Brookfield, can get from
    government contracts.

    It should be noted that the chief reason Carney's main rival was
    defeated in the recent Canadian election was that his electoral
    district was targetted by proportional representation advocates whose
    tactic was to register 90+ "candidates" whose names were placed on the
    ballot in Poilevre's electoral district.

    Apparently the ballot in Poilevre's district was more than 3 feet long
    and it's believed many voters were confused even though party
    affiliation is shown on Canadian ballots. (It wasn't always and I
    remember the election when I was in my early teens and there were two candidates in our district with the same surname and that that evening
    when the results were on TV my mother was quite distressed to find she
    had mis-remembered and inadvertently voted Communist....)

    Ay Caramba! I'd be mortified if I'd voted for a Communist when I meant
    to vote for someone else.

    If I recall correctly, party affiliations ALWAYS appeared on ballots but
    then some bright spark convinced the powers that be to eliminate that
    and so the next election, affiliations were dropped. But they were back
    again the next election (if I recall correctly) so I think there must
    have been more stories like your mother's that prompted them to
    reinstate affiliations.

    I don't know how you could legally prevent this though Canada does
    have a requirement that candidates file a deposit when filing their nomination papers. This deposit is refunded if the candidate gets more
    than a certain percentage (25%? 50%?) of the votes cast for the
    winning candidate. I heard about this years ago when my late
    grandfather was a federal candidate for one of the major parties but
    that was in the 1960s. I know the deposit requirement is still in the elections act but have no idea the amount currently. It's high enough
    to discourage most of the nutbars but not serious candidates.

    Actually, I read a YouTube comment yesterday that said it is no longer necessary to put down a deposit to get on the ballot; this was
    apparently a reform of the Trudeau government some time in the past
    decade. But it was only a YouTube comment with a citation so it may not
    be true. This nonsense with the 3 foot long ballots is probably pretty
    good justification for reinstating the deposit to get on the ballot but
    given that it hurt their enemy Poilievre, it wouldn't surprise me if the Liberals did NOT restore the deposits.


    --
    Rhino

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)