Pedo Retard Elon Lies Again! False claims about USAID funding are sprea
From
Text-Drivers R Killers@21:1/5 to
All on Wed Feb 12 16:25:31 2025
XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.home.repair
False claims about USAID funding are spreading online. Many are not based
on facts
By MELISSA GOLDIN
February 7, 2025
As the Trump administration moves to dismantle the U.S. Agency for International Development, false and misleading information is being
pushed on social media to support the change, much of it spread by the administration and Elon Musk.
The posts raise questions about funding for certain projects and
organizations, often claiming without evidence that the money was used inappropriately.
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said to reporters Tuesday
that USAID had spent �$1.5 million to advance DEI in Serbia�s workplaces; $70,000 for the production of a DEI musical in Ireland; $47,000 for a transgender opera in Colombia, $32,000 for a transgender comic book in
Peru.� Those claims were picked up and spread widely on social media
throughout the week.
Only the grant to a Serbian organization called Grupa Izadji was awarded
by USAID. Its stated aim is to �to advance diversity, equity and
inclusion in Serbia�s workplaces and business communities.�
The rest were awarded by the State Department�s Office of the Under
Secretary for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs. In 2022, it granted
$70,884 to an Irish company for �a live musical event to promote the U.S.
and Irish shared values of diversity, equity, inclusion, and
accessibility.� A grant for $25,000 was awarded in 2021 to a university
in Colombia �to raise awareness and increase the transgender
representation� through the production of an opera, with an additional
$22,020 coming from non-federal funding. And $32,000 awarded in 2022 to a Peruvian organization funded �a tailored-made comic, featuring an LGBTQ+
hero to address social and mental health issues.�
�The information environment about what USAID does and does not do has
gotten to a very difficult place, where there�s a lot of false and
misleading information being circulated,� said Rachel Bonnifield, a
senior fellow at the Center for Global Development. �And I would hope
everybody could hew back to the facts, which are publicly available, and
we can have a good faith discussion about what USAID should and should
not be doing based on those.�
Sean Roberts, a professor of international affairs at George Washington University and director of the school�s international development studies master�s program, explained that it �makes sense� that these programs
were funded by the under secretary�s office.
�They do these small grant programs as outreach to local organizations
and local communities and they�re generally supposed to reflect values of
the United States and the friendship between the countries,� he said. �Sometimes they�re about democracy, in this case they�re about diversity.
But they have nothing to do with USAID.�
Asked about the Trump administration�s portrayal of USAID funding,
including Leavitt�s statement earlier this week, White House deputy press secretary Anna Kelly said, �This waste of taxpayer dollars underscores
why the president paused foreign aid on day one to ensure it aligns with American interests.� She did not address the misrepresented grants cited
above.
What about the media?
Major media outlets are among the organizations that have been singled
out with claims that are false and misleading, including The Associated
Press.
The BBC, for example, was said to have received approximately $3.2
million (2.6 million pounds) during the 2023-2024 financial year. But
that money didn�t go to its news operation. It went to BBC Media Action,
an international charity that is �part of the BBC family,� but
editorially and financially separate from BBC News, the charity said in a statement. It accounted for about 8% of BBC Media Action�s budget that
year.
�We follow the BBC�s editorial standards and values in our support for
public interest media,� reads the statement. �However, all of our funding
goes to our own projects. These are completely separate from the
journalism of BBC News. We have no influence over the editorial decision- making of BBC News. The BBC in the UK is mostly funded by a TV Licence
fee.�
The BBC � not including BBC Media Action, which is a separate entity �
also earns income from the organization�s commercial subsidiaries.
Posts shared widely across social media also falsely claimed that
Politico received at least $8 million from USAID in 2024, with some posts putting that number as high as $34.3 million. That is incorrect. USAID
did pay the news site $44,000 in subscription fees in financial years
2023 and 2024. But additional government payments came from other
entities.
Politico, in a statement to readers from CEO Goli Sheikholeslami and Editor-in-Chief John Harris, said Thursday that it is not getting a
government subsidy.
The Associated Press was among the media outlets said to receive USAID
funding. Although the news wire has been paid $37.5 million by other
government agencies since 2008, none of that came from USAID, according
to a federal government website that tracks its spending. AP spokeswoman
Lauren Easton said that �the U.S. government has long been an AP customer
� through both Democratic and Republican administrations. It licenses
AP�s nonpartisan journalism, just like thousands of news outlets and
customers around the world. It�s quite common for governments to have
contracts with news organizations for their content.�
Values change
Foreign aid experts say that it is normal for an incoming administration
to examine how aid is allocated and make changes based on its values.
�For a new administration to come in and review aid to see if it�s in
line with their view of the American interest and their policy
priorities, their general orientation, in theory this is totally normal
and appropriate. Elections have consequences,� said Bonnifield.
She added, however, that the information being spread on social media
about USAID funding shows a lack of understanding of how the agency
works.
�There are certain motivations being assigned to it that don�t really
seem to square with the facts and people are kind of reaching conclusions without understanding what�s happening,� she said. �That�s not to say necessarily all those expenses are good or should continue, but they�re implying intent that isn�t there.�
Roberts described the Trump administration�s current approach to USAID as �shoot now, ask questions later� in which it is amplifying any funding
data it can by using �incendiary accusations based on nothing.�
�They just tend to obscure any kind of rational discussion about whether
this agency is worthwhile and what its goals are and what�s the purpose
of foreign aid,� he said in reference to recent social media posts about
USAID funding.
Bonnifield and Roberts agreed that further research would be necessary to determine independently from political views whether there are instances
of inappropriate or wasteful spending.
USAID is an independent agency that has provided humanitarian and
development assistance around the world for more than 60 years. According
to its 2023 annual report, the agency worked in more than 100 countries worldwide guided by five areas of focus: promoting global health, support global stability, providing humanitarian assistance, catalyzing
innovation and partnership, and empowering women and girls.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)