• 283 aliens here

    From David Dalton@21:1/5 to All on Tue May 13 21:08:12 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    As I state on the "Waning Clamshell/another reset to pre-judging”
    thread on alt.religion.druid, there are now 283 DNA-based aliens
    in my region, which is basically the Earth Moon system but not
    including deep inside the Earth and the Moon (see that thread
    for an exact description).

    If you happen to know one of the 283, please relay this to them.
    I am also hoping they are scanning the Internet for the number 283.

    As I have posted before, there will be a sudden evolution of
    viruses and DNA-based species in my region.

    The aliens are in four species: a two-spirit one, a four-spirit one,
    a gilled (plus air-breathing) one, and a photosynthesizing one.

    Homo sapiens will split into 60 species, five of which will
    get about an extra 200 years lifespan and 55 of which
    will get an extra 100 years. Those five will be Beothuk
    species (which will be my species after evolution),
    Hain, Vico, Gilled, and Photo, which the aliens, along
    with of course many former homo sapiens, will go into.

    --
    https://www.nfld.com/~dalton/dtales.html Salmon on the Thorns (mystic page) "And the cart is on a wheel; And the wheel is on a hill;
    And the hill is shifting sand; And inside these laws we stand" (Ferron)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From jojo@21:1/5 to JTEM on Wed May 14 15:46:05 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    JTEM wrote:
    On 5/13/25 7:38 PM, David Dalton wrote:
    As I state on the "Waning Clamshell/another reset to pre-judging”
    thread on alt.religion.druid, there are now 283 DNA-based aliens
    in my region, which is basically the Earth Moon system but not
    including deep inside the Earth and the Moon (see that thread
    for an exact description).

    I don't believe that there's any aliens here.

    Oh, aliens have sent tech here, for certain.

    When we search for life on distant worlds what we're actually
    doing is analyzing light.

    Different elements absorb different wavelengths...

    This is how we can be all but certain of life on a world more
    than 100 light years away!

    But, think of this:  We've only been searching for maybe 30 years,
    or a little more.

    That's it.

    In a little more than 30 years we went from finding our very first
    exoplanet to a very STRONG candidate for a life bearing world...

    When did the earth become detectable this way to other worlds?

    BILLIONS of years ago!

    BILLIONS!

    So if once AND ONLY ONCE every million years or so some aliens
    detect the earth, notice that we're life bearing and sent a probe
    to give us a look, there's been 2,0000 alien probes sent toards
    us just since The Great Oxidation Event, the planet's first great
    extinction event.

    If it's just ONCE every million years, there's been over 60 since
    the dinosaurs went extinct...

    There's been two to three since the genus Homo arose -- Humans!

    Again, that's if other civilizations go looking, spot us and send
    a probe ONCE every million years...


    million years is too long, no civilization has cohered for more
    than... 1500 years?? plus technology, an alien society and its
    culture is not going to remain stagnant for a million years, that
    is just absurd!!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew W@21:1/5 to JTEM on Thu May 15 08:59:05 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    "JTEM" wrote in message news:1000t6g$24um9$[email protected]...

    On 5/13/25 7:38 PM, David Dalton wrote:
    As I state on the "Waning Clamshell/another reset to pre-judging”
    thread on alt.religion.druid, there are now 283 DNA-based aliens
    in my region, which is basically the Earth Moon system but not
    including deep inside the Earth and the Moon (see that thread
    for an exact description).

    I don't believe that there's any aliens here.


    That's what governments and mainstream scientists keep claiming. Find out
    why they say that.



    Oh, aliens have sent tech here, for certain.

    When we search for life on distant worlds what we're actually
    doing is analyzing light.

    Different elements absorb different wavelengths...

    This is how we can be all but certain of life on a world more
    than 100 light years away!

    But, think of this: We've only been searching for maybe 30 years,
    or a little more.


    It's been far longer than that.



    That's it.

    In a little more than 30 years we went from finding our very first
    exoplanet to a very STRONG candidate for a life bearing world...


    There's a lot more the gov. are not telling us about.



    When did the earth become detectable this way to other worlds?

    BILLIONS of years ago!

    BILLIONS!

    So if once AND ONLY ONCE every million years or so some aliens
    detect the earth, notice that we're life bearing and sent a probe
    to give us a look, there's been 2,0000 alien probes sent toards
    us just since The Great Oxidation Event, the planet's first great
    extinction event.

    If it's just ONCE every million years, there's been over 60 since
    the dinosaurs went extinct...

    There's been two to three since the genus Homo arose -- Humans!

    Again, that's if other civilizations go looking, spot us and send
    a probe ONCE every million years...



    --
    “We own everyone of any significance in the major media.” CIA Director William Colby
    “We’ll know when our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the
    American people believes is false.” CIA Director William Casey

    Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
    the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew W@21:1/5 to JTEM on Thu May 15 14:38:02 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    "JTEM" wrote in message news:1003qc3$2v43p$[email protected]...

    On 5/14/25 11:46 AM, jojo wrote:

    million years is too long,

    No it isn't.

    You're not thinking clearly, just reacting.

    In all probability probes have been sent towards the earth for the
    last 2 billion years, at least. All I'm saying is if it's a once
    in a million year event, an alien civilization sending a probe,
    there's been over 60 since the dinosaurs, and 2 to 3 since humans,
    the genus Homo, arose.


    And they're too primitive to know how to fold space and come here
    themselves?


    --
    “We own everyone of any significance in the major media.” CIA Director William Colby
    “We’ll know when our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the
    American people believes is false.” CIA Director William Casey

    Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
    the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew W@21:1/5 to JTEM on Thu May 15 14:45:22 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    "JTEM" wrote in message news:1003lm2$2uabk$[email protected]...

    Andrew W wrote:

    "JTEM" wrote in message news:1000t6g$24um9$[email protected]...

    I don't believe that there's any aliens here.


    That's what governments and mainstream scientists keep claiming. Find out
    why they say that.

    They say that because there aren't any here.


    Why such a closed minded definitive response?



    Oh, aliens have sent tech here, for certain.

    When we search for life on distant worlds what we're actually
    doing is analyzing light.

    Different elements absorb different wavelengths...

    This is how we can be all but certain of life on a world more
    than 100 light years away!

    But, think of this: We've only been searching for maybe 30 years,
    or a little more.

    It's been far longer than that.

    No. We hadn't the means to search.


    Governments have been hiding advanced tech from the masses for many decades.



    We didn't find our first exoplanet until the 1990s!


    Um, only according to mainstream scientists who are funded by government grants. They have to keep quiet or they lose their funding and reputations.



    In a little more than 30 years we went from finding our very first
    exoplanet to a very STRONG candidate for a life bearing world...


    There's a lot more the gov. are not telling us about.

    Absolutely. But one of those things is NOT aliens arriving here on
    Earth.


    How do you know that with such certainty?
    Plenty of people have met ETs, even in biblical times and before. Some have been in their craft.


    --
    “We own everyone of any significance in the major media.” CIA Director William Colby
    “We’ll know when our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the
    American people believes is false.” CIA Director William Casey

    Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
    the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Sylvia Else@21:1/5 to David Dalton on Thu May 15 16:57:19 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    On 14-May-25 7:38 am, David Dalton wrote:
    I am also hoping they are scanning the Internet for the number 283.


    Why would they be scanning the Internet for the number of aliens you're
    aware of? How would they even know which number to scan for?

    Sylvia

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott Dorsey@21:1/5 to All on Thu May 15 08:09:53 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    Two Hundred Eighty-Three card-carrying aliens in the State Department!
    --scott
    --
    "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mitchell Holman@21:1/5 to Andrew W on Thu May 15 12:45:53 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in
    news:1003rh6$2v9s5$[email protected]:



    We didn't find our first exoplanet until the 1990s!


    Um, only according to mainstream scientists who are funded by
    government grants. They have to keep quiet or they lose their funding
    and reputations.




    Why would government cover up a scientific
    discovery of an exoplanet?

    Is everything a conspiracy for you?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From jojo@21:1/5 to JTEM on Thu May 15 16:52:47 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    JTEM wrote:
    On 5/15/25 12:38 AM, Andrew W wrote:

    And they're too primitive to know how to fold space and come
    here themselves?

    That's called an "Argument from ignorance."

    "We don't know so, they can do it!"

    Actually, as far as we know it's impossible. As far as we know
    there's no way any civilization no matter how advanced could
    ever do it.

    "But..but...we don't know, so they can!"

    We have to base our conjecture on reality.


    our theory and understanding of the universe is very much
    incomplete, there are too many holes and explanations of observed
    phenomenon that do not conform to our expectations.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From jojo@21:1/5 to JTEM on Thu May 15 16:51:14 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    JTEM wrote:
    On 5/14/25 11:46 AM, jojo wrote:

    million years is too long, no civilization has cohered for more
    than... 1500 years?? plus technology, an alien society and its
    culture is not going to remain stagnant for a million years,
    that is just absurd!!

    I have no idea what you're saying.

    Voyager 2 will pass "close" by the star Ross 248 in a mere 40,000
    years.
    Technology has advanced every day since it's launch and yet it was
    launched.

    Again, I'm saying that no aliens are here, none of attempted the
    trip.
    But they are sending technology just as we are.

    In fact, when the Voyagers were launched he lacked the means to
    detect
    exoplanets!  That would come later. Yet we were already sending deep
    space probes...

    So, if you "Argue" that this sort of thing only happens rarely --
    maybe
    once in a million years -- will ONE and only ONE amongst the
    alien bearing worlds send a probe our way, check out this planet
    with all the
    tell tale signs of life.

    That would STILL allow for over 60 arrivals since the dinosaurs. And
    between 2 and 3 since humans -- the genus Homo -- have arose.


    aliens could be here, they could be non-fleshy ai-like probes,
    possible. my point is even if these aliens sent probes say a
    million years ago, considering the rate of technological
    progress, they will have in.. say 50 or 100 years figured out how
    to outrun that old probe and in another 250 years found ways to
    even go superluminal, so as to render that old probe's speed
    irrelevant.

    i am not assuming that traversing the cosmos will have the
    relativistic speed limit.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Dalton@21:1/5 to Sylvia Else on Thu May 15 19:26:03 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    On May 15, 2025, Sylvia Else wrote
    (in article <[email protected]>):

    On 14-May-25 7:38 am, David Dalton wrote:
    I am also hoping they are scanning the Internet for the number 283.

    Why would they be scanning the Internet for the number of aliens you're
    aware of? How would they even know which number to scan for?

    Sylvia

    If there are actually 283 aliens in the Earth Moon system,
    they might want to know if/when someone is aware of that.

    And I have divined different numbers several times before,
    including an out-of-date one still in the Glossary on my
    mystic page, and if the 283 is indeed accurate that is a
    sign than my global new age onset activation sequence
    is working or will soon.

    But anyway, since Google Groups stopped being updated
    I don’t think new Usenet posts show up in a regular google
    search, though they are probably not restricted to just a
    regular google search.

    --
    https://www.nfld.com/~dalton/dtales.html Salmon on the Thorns (mystic page) "And the cart is on a wheel; And the wheel is on a hill;
    And the hill is shifting sand; And inside these laws we stand" (Ferron)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Dalton@21:1/5 to JTEM on Thu May 15 20:34:25 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    On May 15, 2025, JTEM wrote
    (in article <1005p31$3b04c$[email protected]>):

    On 5/15/25 5:56 PM, David Dalton wrote:

    If there are actually 283 aliens in the Earth Moon system

    Would that be 283 aliens -- like two extended families plus
    their pets -- or do you mean representatives of 283 alien
    species, or "Types" of aliens if you will?

    As I said at the start of the thread, they are of four different
    DNA-based species, a two-spirit transitioning one,
    a four-spirit transitioning one, a gilled (plus air-breathing)
    one, and a photosynthesizing (plus air-breathing) one.
    I don’t know how many are in each of the four.

    They are refugees and the last of their species and
    this is their adopted home, and they will merge
    with many soon former homo sapiens into Hain,
    Vico, Gilled, and Photo species if my attempt at
    instigating sudden evolution ever works.

    There was once a non-DNA-based alien species visiting
    here who were not refugees, and I have divined that
    they have left some technology buried on the moon.
    I cannot divine how long ago they were here.

    --
    https://www.nfld.com/~dalton/dtales.html Salmon on the Thorns (mystic page) "And the cart is on a wheel; And the wheel is on a hill;
    And the hill is shifting sand; And inside these laws we stand" (Ferron)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew W@21:1/5 to JTEM on Fri May 16 09:18:08 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    "JTEM" wrote in message news:1003u8e$2vgag$[email protected]...

    On 5/15/25 12:38 AM, Andrew W wrote:

    And they're too primitive to know how to fold space and come here
    themselves?

    That's called an "Argument from ignorance."

    "We don't know so, they can do it!"


    The top levels of our governments and military do know. You obviously
    haven't heard of the secret space program.



    Actually, as far as we know it's impossible. As far as we know
    there's no way any civilization no matter how advanced could
    ever do it.

    "But..but...we don't know, so they can!"

    We have to base our conjecture on reality.


    It's obvious you've never looked into this subject.


    --
    “We own everyone of any significance in the major media.” CIA Director William Colby
    “We’ll know when our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the
    American people believes is false.” CIA Director William Casey

    Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
    the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew W@21:1/5 to Mitchell Holman on Fri May 16 09:26:45 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message news:[email protected]...

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in
    news:1003rh6$2v9s5$[email protected]:



    We didn't find our first exoplanet until the 1990s!


    Um, only according to mainstream scientists who are funded by
    government grants. They have to keep quiet or they lose their funding
    and reputations.




    Why would government cover up a scientific
    discovery of an exoplanet?


    Simple. Because then the world would find out the earth's and humanity's
    true history, and that would lead to them losing power and profits.



    Is everything a conspiracy for you?


    No. Is everything the MSM and gov. say the truth and fact for you?


    --
    “We own everyone of any significance in the major media.” CIA Director William Colby
    “We’ll know when our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the
    American people believes is false.” CIA Director William Casey

    Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
    the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew W@21:1/5 to JTEM on Fri May 16 09:29:57 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    "JTEM" wrote in message news:1003v7l$2vgag$[email protected]...

    Andrew W wrote:

    Plenty of people have met ETs, even in biblical times and before. Some
    have been in their craft.

    Here's what the Google says you need just to visit another part of the
    earth. No, NOT a strange new planet but just a different part of this
    planet:

    To travel to Nigeria, it's crucial to get vaccinated against several >diseases. Specifically, the CDC and WHO recommend vaccinations for yellow >fever, typhoid, hepatitis A, polio, rabies, hepatitis B, and meningitis. >Additionally, consider getting up-to-date on routine vaccines like measles, >mumps, rubella, chickenpox, and influenza. Passport Health also recommends >considering COVID-19, pneumonia, shingles, and Tdap (tetanus, diphtheria, >pertussis) vaccinations


    Vaxes? How did that become the topic?

    Why do you cling so hard to mainstream science?


    --
    “We own everyone of any significance in the major media.” CIA Director William Colby
    “We’ll know when our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the
    American people believes is false.” CIA Director William Casey

    Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
    the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott Dorsey@21:1/5 to Andrew W on Thu May 15 20:03:46 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    In article <1005tds$3cocb$[email protected]>, Andrew W <[email protected]> wrote: >Vaxes? How did that become the topic?

    If it's not 36 bits, you're not playing with a full DEC.
    --scott

    --
    "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mitchell Holman@21:1/5 to Andrew W on Fri May 16 01:28:32 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in news:1005t7r$3cnf6$[email protected]:

    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message news:[email protected]...

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in
    news:1003rh6$2v9s5$[email protected]:



    We didn't find our first exoplanet until the 1990s!


    Um, only according to mainstream scientists who are funded by
    government grants. They have to keep quiet or they lose their funding
    and reputations.




    Why would government cover up a scientific
    discovery of an exoplanet?


    Simple. Because then the world would find out the earth's and humanity's
    true history, and that would lead to them losing power and profits.



    Has that happened since the discovery
    of hundreds of exoplanets?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew W@21:1/5 to Mitchell Holman on Fri May 16 12:16:47 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message news:[email protected]...

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in news:1005t7r$3cnf6$[email protected]:

    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in >>>news:1003rh6$2v9s5$[email protected]:



    We didn't find our first exoplanet until the 1990s!


    Um, only according to mainstream scientists who are funded by
    government grants. They have to keep quiet or they lose their funding
    and reputations.




    Why would government cover up a scientific
    discovery of an exoplanet?


    Simple. Because then the world would find out the earth's and humanity's
    true history, and that would lead to them losing power and profits.



    Has that happened since the discovery
    of hundreds of exoplanets?


    Discovery of exoplanets is only the first step. They're still not telling
    the people the important details like the earth's true history and who/what else is in this galaxy.


    --
    “We own everyone of any significance in the major media.” CIA Director William Colby
    “We’ll know when our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the
    American people believes is false.” CIA Director William Casey

    Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
    the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bob Casanova@21:1/5 to All on Thu May 15 21:29:09 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    On Fri, 16 May 2025 12:16:47 +1000, the following appeared
    in sci.skeptic, posted by "Andrew W" <[email protected]>:

    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message >news:[email protected]...

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in news:1005t7r$3cnf6$[email protected]: >>
    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>news:1003rh6$2v9s5$[email protected]:



    We didn't find our first exoplanet until the 1990s!


    Um, only according to mainstream scientists who are funded by
    government grants. They have to keep quiet or they lose their funding >>>>> and reputations.




    Why would government cover up a scientific
    discovery of an exoplanet?


    Simple. Because then the world would find out the earth's and humanity's >>> true history, and that would lead to them losing power and profits.



    Has that happened since the discovery
    of hundreds of exoplanets?


    Discovery of exoplanets is only the first step. They're still not telling
    the people the important details like the earth's true history and who/what >else is in this galaxy.

    Just a note...

    MIB was not a documentary. Neither was Encounters of the
    Third Kind.

    The Omen, OTOH...

    --

    Bob C.

    "The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
    the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
    'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"

    - Isaac Asimov

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bob Casanova@21:1/5 to All on Thu May 15 21:26:59 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    On Thu, 15 May 2025 20:03:46 -0400 (EDT), the following
    appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by [email protected] (Scott
    Dorsey):

    In article <1005tds$3cocb$[email protected]>, Andrew W <[email protected]> wrote:
    Vaxes? How did that become the topic?

    If it's not 36 bits, you're not playing with a full DEC.

    :-)

    Well played, sir!

    --

    Bob C.

    "The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
    the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
    'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"

    - Isaac Asimov

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew W@21:1/5 to JTEM on Fri May 16 21:36:47 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    "JTEM" wrote in message news:1006jtj$3k5vh$[email protected]...

    On 5/15/25 7:18 PM, Andrew W wrote:
    "JTEM" wrote in message news:1003u8e$2vgag$[email protected]...

    That's called an "Argument from ignorance."

    "We don't know so, they can do it!"

    The top levels of our governments and military do know.

    Thank goodness for your ESP!


    No, years of research.



    Seeing how you can read their minds, why don't you just tell
    us where these aliens are hiding?


    Mainly in mountainous areas.



    The unspoken lines in this story is how long these aliens
    have been here,

    Hundreds of thousands of years.



    and how many people that necessitates being
    in on the secret without it all getting out...


    Only high ranking people in the military and CIA etc. are privy to all the details.



    It's not even good science fiction, really. More like bad
    fan fiction.


    That's how it sounds like to you because you've been conditioned and
    programmed by society.
    Be brave and step away from the mainstream narrative.


    --
    “We own everyone of any significance in the major media.” CIA Director William Colby
    “We’ll know when our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the
    American people believes is false.” CIA Director William Casey

    Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
    the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mitchell Holman@21:1/5 to Andrew W on Fri May 16 12:48:10 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in
    news:100676l$3i7jt$[email protected]:

    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message news:[email protected]...

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in
    news:1005t7r$3cnf6$[email protected]:

    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>news:1003rh6$2v9s5$[email protected]:



    We didn't find our first exoplanet until the 1990s!


    Um, only according to mainstream scientists who are funded by
    government grants. They have to keep quiet or they lose their
    funding and reputations.




    Why would government cover up a scientific
    discovery of an exoplanet?


    Simple. Because then the world would find out the earth's and
    humanity's true history, and that would lead to them losing power
    and profits.



    Has that happened since the discovery
    of hundreds of exoplanets?


    Discovery of exoplanets is only the first step. They're still not
    telling the people the important details like the earth's true history
    and who/what else is in this galaxy.


    OK, it is a slow news day,
    let's explore that first one.

    What is Earth's "true history"
    that "they" are not telling us?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From jojo@21:1/5 to JTEM on Fri May 16 15:15:03 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    JTEM wrote:
    On 5/15/25 12:51 PM, jojo wrote:

    aliens could be here

    You've confused the theoretically possible for the probable.

    It's theoretically possible that you could Quantum Tunnel right
    through the floor, for example, but it's so improbable that
    multiple universes could exist back to back without ever once
    seeing anything approaching your mass managing to Quantum
    Tunnel through a solid structure.

    This is a an extremely common and quite annoying error that
    people make. You cling to the "Theoretically possibly" label
    while ignoring the "So improbable that you'd have a better
    shot at teaching your goldfish to sing & dance."



    sooo... aliens are a theoretical construct??

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From jojo@21:1/5 to JTEM on Fri May 16 15:21:16 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    JTEM wrote:
    On 5/15/25 12:52 PM, jojo wrote:

    our theory and understanding of the universe is very much
    incomplete

    You're simply illustrating my point:  The argument from ignorance.

    "Well as far as we know there's no way it could happen, so they must
    be doing it all the time."

    No. That's ridiculous.


    i believe i was stating the opposite, that if a technological
    civilization exists which is even 100 years more advanced than
    our current state, we would not be able to even comprehend their
    engineered products.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From jojo@21:1/5 to JTEM on Fri May 16 15:17:49 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    JTEM wrote:
    On 5/15/25 12:51 PM, jojo wrote:

    aliens could be here,

    Again, you're confusing "Possibility" with "Probability."

    It's possible that you could win the Powerball jackpot eight
    times in a row. It's so improbable as to render the idea
    laughable but none the less it is possible.

    There comes a point where probabilities are so minute, things
    are so improbable that it's foolish to entertain them.

    This is reality.

    my point is even if these aliens sent probes say a million
    years ago, considering the rate of technological progress, they
    will have in.. say 50 or 100 years figured out how to outrun
    that old probe and in another 250 years found ways to even go
    superluminal, so as to render that old probe's speed irrelevant.

    We've been sending probes since 1977. By your argument, we haven't.
    Voyager I & II never launched, because we could do better later.

    Or, put another way:  I honestly don't understand what you're
    saying.

    We know you're not raising any issue that would prevent the
    sending of
    a probe, because we ourselves have sent probes even though our tech
    continues to advance.


    i am saying.... for example, our phones have more compute power
    than all of the apollo missions combined.

    if you scale that to traversing the cosmos, something going at
    0.05c will have no impact compared to an effective multiple of c.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From jojo@21:1/5 to Mitchell Holman on Fri May 16 15:29:13 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    Mitchell Holman wrote:
    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in
    news:100676l$3i7jt$[email protected]:

    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in
    news:1005t7r$3cnf6$[email protected]:

    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in
    news:1003rh6$2v9s5$[email protected]:



    We didn't find our first exoplanet until the 1990s!


    Um, only according to mainstream scientists who are funded by
    government grants. They have to keep quiet or they lose their
    funding and reputations.




    Why would government cover up a scientific
    discovery of an exoplanet?


    Simple. Because then the world would find out the earth's and
    humanity's true history, and that would lead to them losing power
    and profits.



    Has that happened since the discovery
    of hundreds of exoplanets?


    Discovery of exoplanets is only the first step. They're still not
    telling the people the important details like the earth's true history
    and who/what else is in this galaxy.


    OK, it is a slow news day,
    let's explore that first one.

    What is Earth's "true history"
    that "they" are not telling us?


    oh that whole pyramid thing and then they just said brb.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott Dorsey@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Fri May 16 11:26:13 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    jojo <[email protected]> wrote:

    i believe i was stating the opposite, that if a technological
    civilization exists which is even 100 years more advanced than
    our current state, we would not be able to even comprehend their
    engineered products.

    Hell, we can't even comprehend our own engineered products half the
    time, and nobody will give you a service manual anymore.
    --scott
    --
    "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Sylvia Else@21:1/5 to David Dalton on Sat May 17 00:35:35 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    On 16-May-25 5:56 am, David Dalton wrote:
    On May 15, 2025, Sylvia Else wrote
    (in article <[email protected]>):

    On 14-May-25 7:38 am, David Dalton wrote:
    I am also hoping they are scanning the Internet for the number 283.

    Why would they be scanning the Internet for the number of aliens you're
    aware of? How would they even know which number to scan for?

    Sylvia

    If there are actually 283 aliens in the Earth Moon system,
    they might want to know if/when someone is aware of that.

    But someone only knows about 282 two of them, that's not a problem?

    Sylvia

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From jojo@21:1/5 to Sylvia Else on Fri May 16 17:09:51 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    Sylvia Else wrote:
    On 16-May-25 5:56 am, David Dalton wrote:
    On May 15, 2025, Sylvia Else wrote
    (in article <[email protected]>):

    On 14-May-25 7:38 am, David Dalton wrote:
    I am also hoping they are scanning the Internet for the
    number 283.

    Why would they be scanning the Internet for the number of
    aliens you're
    aware of? How would they even know which number to scan for?

    Sylvia

    If there are actually 283 aliens in the Earth Moon system,
    they might want to know if/when someone is aware of that.

    But someone only knows about 282 two of them, that's not a problem?

    Sylvia


    i would love to be acquanted with even one of them!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Malte Runz@21:1/5 to All on Fri May 16 19:24:41 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    On Fri, 16 May 2025 12:16:47 +1000, "Andrew W" <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message >news:[email protected]...

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in news:1005t7r$3cnf6$[email protected]: >>
    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>news:1003rh6$2v9s5$[email protected]:



    We didn't find our first exoplanet until the 1990s!


    Um, only according to mainstream scientists who are funded by
    government grants. They have to keep quiet or they lose their funding >>>>> and reputations.




    Why would government cover up a scientific
    discovery of an exoplanet?


    Simple. Because then the world would find out the earth's and humanity's >>> true history, and that would lead to them losing power and profits.



    Has that happened since the discovery
    of hundreds of exoplanets?


    Discovery of exoplanets is only the first step. They're still not telling
    the people the important details like the earth's true history and who/what >else is in this galaxy.

    I take it that you know many of the details. You know Earth's true
    history and a lot of other facts about what goes on in this galaxy.

    But instead of sharing that information, and your sources, with us,
    you'll spend post after post coming up with excuses for not doing it.

    'You're too lazy to do your own research.' 'I can't list all the
    information I've spent decades finding.' 'The deep state has destroyed
    the evidence.' 'You only believe MSM.' 'You're mind controlled by the
    elites.' 'Why do you even need evidence?'

    On and on it goes. We been through this many times before, so unless
    you have some new material, I'll suggest you go fuck yourself. Cool?


    --
    Malte Runz

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From jojo@21:1/5 to Malte Runz on Fri May 16 17:28:34 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    Malte Runz wrote:
    On Fri, 16 May 2025 12:16:47 +1000, "Andrew W" <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in news:1005t7r$3cnf6$[email protected]: >>>
    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in
    news:1003rh6$2v9s5$[email protected]:



    We didn't find our first exoplanet until the 1990s!


    Um, only according to mainstream scientists who are funded by
    government grants. They have to keep quiet or they lose their funding >>>>>> and reputations.




    Why would government cover up a scientific
    discovery of an exoplanet?


    Simple. Because then the world would find out the earth's and humanity's >>>> true history, and that would lead to them losing power and profits.



    Has that happened since the discovery
    of hundreds of exoplanets?


    Discovery of exoplanets is only the first step. They're still not telling
    the people the important details like the earth's true history and who/what >> else is in this galaxy.

    I take it that you know many of the details. You know Earth's true
    history and a lot of other facts about what goes on in this galaxy.

    But instead of sharing that information, and your sources, with us,
    you'll spend post after post coming up with excuses for not doing it.

    'You're too lazy to do your own research.' 'I can't list all the
    information I've spent decades finding.' 'The deep state has destroyed
    the evidence.' 'You only believe MSM.' 'You're mind controlled by the elites.' 'Why do you even need evidence?'

    On and on it goes. We been through this many times before, so unless
    you have some new material, I'll suggest you go fuck yourself. Cool?



    hi malte, which group are you posting from?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bob Casanova@21:1/5 to All on Fri May 16 10:41:02 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    On Fri, 16 May 2025 19:24:41 +0200, the following appeared
    in sci.skeptic, posted by Malte Runz <[email protected]>:

    On Fri, 16 May 2025 12:16:47 +1000, "Andrew W" <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message >>news:[email protected]...

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in news:1005t7r$3cnf6$[email protected]: >>>
    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>news:1003rh6$2v9s5$[email protected]:



    We didn't find our first exoplanet until the 1990s!


    Um, only according to mainstream scientists who are funded by
    government grants. They have to keep quiet or they lose their funding >>>>>> and reputations.




    Why would government cover up a scientific
    discovery of an exoplanet?


    Simple. Because then the world would find out the earth's and humanity's >>>> true history, and that would lead to them losing power and profits.



    Has that happened since the discovery
    of hundreds of exoplanets?


    Discovery of exoplanets is only the first step. They're still not telling >>the people the important details like the earth's true history and who/what >>else is in this galaxy.

    I take it that you know many of the details. You know Earth's true
    history and a lot of other facts about what goes on in this galaxy.

    But instead of sharing that information, and your sources, with us,
    you'll spend post after post coming up with excuses for not doing it.

    'You're too lazy to do your own research.' 'I can't list all the
    information I've spent decades finding.' 'The deep state has destroyed
    the evidence.' 'You only believe MSM.' 'You're mind controlled by the >elites.' 'Why do you even need evidence?'

    You forgot, "I could tell you, but then I'd have to use the
    neuralizer on you."

    On and on it goes. We been through this many times before, so unless
    you have some new material, I'll suggest you go fuck yourself. Cool?

    Works for me.

    And since I'm reading this in sci.skeptic, and since this
    crap is different woo-woo crap and has zip to do with claims
    of the paranormal, I'll sign off this thread.

    --

    Bob C.

    "The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
    the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
    'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"

    - Isaac Asimov

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mitchell Holman@21:1/5 to Malte Runz on Fri May 16 18:00:19 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    Malte Runz <[email protected]> wrote in news:[email protected]:

    On Fri, 16 May 2025 12:16:47 +1000, "Andrew W" <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message >>news:[email protected]...

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in >>>news:1005t7r$3cnf6$[email protected]:

    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>news:1003rh6$2v9s5$[email protected]:



    We didn't find our first exoplanet until the 1990s!


    Um, only according to mainstream scientists who are funded by
    government grants. They have to keep quiet or they lose their
    funding and reputations.




    Why would government cover up a scientific
    discovery of an exoplanet?


    Simple. Because then the world would find out the earth's and
    humanity's true history, and that would lead to them losing power
    and profits.



    Has that happened since the discovery
    of hundreds of exoplanets?


    Discovery of exoplanets is only the first step. They're still not
    telling the people the important details like the earth's true history
    and who/what else is in this galaxy.

    I take it that you know many of the details. You know Earth's true
    history and a lot of other facts about what goes on in this galaxy.

    But instead of sharing that information, and your sources, with us,
    you'll spend post after post coming up with excuses for not doing it.

    'You're too lazy to do your own research.' 'I can't list all the
    information I've spent decades finding.' 'The deep state has destroyed
    the evidence.' 'You only believe MSM.' 'You're mind controlled by the elites.' 'Why do you even need evidence?'

    On and on it goes. We been through this many times before, so unless
    you have some new material, I'll suggest you go fuck yourself. Cool?



    It is depressing there are so many
    conspiracy-behind-everything kooks like
    him. Their lives re so unremarkable and
    enpty they invent a "special knowledge"
    they think elevates them above everyone
    else.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From jojo@21:1/5 to JTEM on Fri May 16 21:52:11 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    JTEM wrote:
    On 5/16/25 11:15 AM, jojo wrote:

    sooo... aliens are a theoretical construct??

    It seems implausible that you could fail so miserably at
    discerning the context. I have to assume that you suffer
    from a narcissistic personality disorder, at the very
    least, and are thus compelled to obfuscate.

    To anyone else:  The claim is that aliens are here, present
    in our solar system, not merely existing.


    okay, super. so its a claim, and not something either
    theoretically possible nor probable? right?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From jojo@21:1/5 to JTEM on Fri May 16 21:54:33 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    JTEM wrote:
    On 5/16/25 11:17 AM, jojo wrote:

    i am saying.... for example, our phones have more compute power
    than all of the apollo missions combined.

    It's meaningless.

    What you were pretending is that aliens couldn't send tech our way
    because so much time would go by before it reached us that,
    undoubtedly, their technology would have greatly exceeded anything
    they sent. Which is crazy, because we launched the Voyager probes
    back in the 1970s and our advancement in tech since then has not
    caused them to vanish, at least not yet.


    vanish? so you are saying our tech will vanish them eventually to
    protect our coordinates?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From jojo@21:1/5 to JTEM on Fri May 16 21:56:25 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    JTEM wrote:
    On 5/16/25 11:21 AM, jojo wrote:

    i believe i was stating the opposite, that if a technological
    civilization exists which is even 100 years more advanced than
    our current state, we would not be able to even comprehend
    their engineered products.

    This is pointless, as well as baseless. It does not even
    align at all with the claim under debate, that aliens are
    present in our solar system and/or the earth itself.

    Smash an iPhone into pieces and send it back in time 100 years.
    If they found any of the pieces, if they went into the hands of
    men of science, they'd know they were artificial, that it was
    some kind of tech. They'd have no idea what they were pieces to
    but they would know that it was fragments of a technology.

    You can think of it like a written language:  You might not be
    able to read it but you can recognize what it is. You know it's
    writing. You just can't read it. Given enough, given some added
    context -- maybe depictions of people or events accompanying
    this language -- you may even eventually translate it. But you
    don't have to translate it to know what it is, and that it
    isn't natural.


    in your opinion, are aliens here or not?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew W@21:1/5 to JTEM on Sat May 17 08:54:47 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    "JTEM" wrote in message news:100856f$3tpqq$[email protected]...

    On 5/16/25 7:36 AM, Andrew W wrote:

    No, years of research.

    Yes, I saw a documentary on this stuff. Apparently the aliens
    have been visiting the earth since at least the paleolithic,
    according to this documentary. It illustrated The Great Gazoo
    interacting with the typical stone age man, his neighbor
    "Barney" and even his dog (dinosaur) named "Dino." It was
    quite revealing.

    I'm not going to ask you how much of your work is based on
    source materials such as this, but it appears to be quite a
    lot of it, based on your remarks.


    Most of those documentaries are based on some truth but then inject ridicule
    to throw people off.
    It's entertainment and a psychological program. There is real research and evidence on this subject that most people never look at for fear of being ridiculed by others.


    --
    “We own everyone of any significance in the major media.” CIA Director William Colby
    “We’ll know when our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the
    American people believes is false.” CIA Director William Casey

    Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
    the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew W@21:1/5 to JTEM on Sat May 17 08:46:53 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    "JTEM" wrote in message news:1006k13$3k5vh$[email protected]...

    On 5/15/25 7:29 PM, Andrew W wrote:
    "JTEM" wrote in message news:1003v7l$2vgag$[email protected]...

    Here's what the Google says you need just to visit another part of the
    earth. No, NOT a strange new planet but just a different part of this
    planet:

    To travel to Nigeria, it's crucial to get vaccinated against several
    diseases. Specifically, the CDC and WHO recommend vaccinations for
    yellow fever, typhoid, hepatitis A, polio, rabies, hepatitis B, and
    meningitis. Additionally, consider getting up-to-date on routine
    vaccines like measles, mumps, rubella, chickenpox, and influenza.
    Passport Health also recommends considering COVID-19, pneumonia,
    shingles, and Tdap (tetanus, diphtheria, pertussis) vaccinations


    Vaxes? How did that become the topic?

    You're trolling. For sure. No question.


    But governments would never mislead you or hold anything back?



    Why do you cling so hard to mainstream science?

    "Why, just look at all the anti-gravity machines flying around!"


    Ah, pivot time.


    --
    “We own everyone of any significance in the major media.” CIA Director William Colby
    “We’ll know when our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the
    American people believes is false.” CIA Director William Casey

    Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
    the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew W@21:1/5 to Mitchell Holman on Sat May 17 09:01:42 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message news:[email protected]...

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in
    news:100676l$3i7jt$[email protected]:

    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in >>>news:1005t7r$3cnf6$[email protected]:

    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>news:1003rh6$2v9s5$[email protected]:



    We didn't find our first exoplanet until the 1990s!


    Um, only according to mainstream scientists who are funded by
    government grants. They have to keep quiet or they lose their
    funding and reputations.




    Why would government cover up a scientific
    discovery of an exoplanet?


    Simple. Because then the world would find out the earth's and
    humanity's true history, and that would lead to them losing power
    and profits.



    Has that happened since the discovery
    of hundreds of exoplanets?


    Discovery of exoplanets is only the first step. They're still not
    telling the people the important details like the earth's true history
    and who/what else is in this galaxy.


    OK, it is a slow news day,
    let's explore that first one.

    What is Earth's "true history"
    that "they" are not telling us?


    You will learn that when you're ready, if you live that long.
    Clue: Humanity has never been alone.


    --
    “We own everyone of any significance in the major media.” CIA Director William Colby
    “We’ll know when our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the
    American people believes is false.” CIA Director William Casey

    Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
    the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew W@21:1/5 to Mitchell Holman on Sat May 17 09:25:55 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message news:[email protected]...

    Malte Runz <[email protected]> wrote in >news:[email protected]:

    On Fri, 16 May 2025 12:16:47 +1000, "Andrew W" <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message >>>news:[email protected]...

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>news:1005t7r$3cnf6$[email protected]:

    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>news:1003rh6$2v9s5$[email protected]:



    We didn't find our first exoplanet until the 1990s!


    Um, only according to mainstream scientists who are funded by
    government grants. They have to keep quiet or they lose their
    funding and reputations.




    Why would government cover up a scientific
    discovery of an exoplanet?


    Simple. Because then the world would find out the earth's and
    humanity's true history, and that would lead to them losing power
    and profits.



    Has that happened since the discovery
    of hundreds of exoplanets?


    Discovery of exoplanets is only the first step. They're still not
    telling the people the important details like the earth's true history >>>and who/what else is in this galaxy.

    I take it that you know many of the details. You know Earth's true
    history and a lot of other facts about what goes on in this galaxy.

    But instead of sharing that information, and your sources, with us,
    you'll spend post after post coming up with excuses for not doing it.

    'You're too lazy to do your own research.' 'I can't list all the
    information I've spent decades finding.' 'The deep state has destroyed
    the evidence.' 'You only believe MSM.' 'You're mind controlled by the
    elites.' 'Why do you even need evidence?'

    On and on it goes. We been through this many times before, so unless
    you have some new material, I'll suggest you go fuck yourself. Cool?



    It is depressing there are so many
    conspiracy-behind-everything kooks like
    him. Their lives re so unremarkable and
    enpty they invent a "special knowledge"
    they think elevates them above everyone
    else.


    But scientists never invent new theories to become prominent and get
    government grants?
    Every ten years or so they throw out most of their theories and make up new ones. But you still trust them that only they have the 'facts'.


    --
    “We own everyone of any significance in the major media.” CIA Director William Colby
    “We’ll know when our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the
    American people believes is false.” CIA Director William Casey

    Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
    the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew W@21:1/5 to Malte Runz on Sat May 17 09:17:46 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    "Malte Runz" wrote in message news:[email protected]...

    On Fri, 16 May 2025 12:16:47 +1000, "Andrew W" <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message >>news:[email protected]...

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in >>>news:1005t7r$3cnf6$[email protected]:

    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>news:1003rh6$2v9s5$[email protected]:



    We didn't find our first exoplanet until the 1990s!


    Um, only according to mainstream scientists who are funded by
    government grants. They have to keep quiet or they lose their funding >>>>>> and reputations.




    Why would government cover up a scientific
    discovery of an exoplanet?


    Simple. Because then the world would find out the earth's and
    humanity's
    true history, and that would lead to them losing power and profits.



    Has that happened since the discovery
    of hundreds of exoplanets?


    Discovery of exoplanets is only the first step. They're still not telling >>the people the important details like the earth's true history and
    who/what
    else is in this galaxy.

    I take it that you know many of the details. You know Earth's true
    history and a lot of other facts about what goes on in this galaxy.

    But instead of sharing that information, and your sources, with us,
    you'll spend post after post coming up with excuses for not doing it.


    Again you want info from me, because you have none of your own. But you're
    not even truly interested in this subject.
    Why would anyone have to go to the trouble of sharing information with jerks like you who think with their emotions and can only handle following authorities?



    'You're too lazy to do your own research.' 'I can't list all the
    information I've spent decades finding.' 'The deep state has destroyed
    the evidence.' 'You only believe MSM.' 'You're mind controlled by the >elites.' 'Why do you even need evidence?'


    All true.



    On and on it goes. We been through this many times before, so unless
    you have some new material, I'll suggest you go fuck yourself. Cool?


    Our governments never have anything new on this subject but you would never dare tell them that. You have never realised that they are full of excuses
    and peanut offerings. You always just point fingers at ordinary people.


    --
    “We own everyone of any significance in the major media.” CIA Director William Colby
    “We’ll know when our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the
    American people believes is false.” CIA Director William Casey

    Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
    the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bobbie Sellers@21:1/5 to Andrew W on Fri May 16 18:19:13 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    On 5/16/25 16:25, Andrew W wrote:
    "Mitchell Holman"  wrote in message news:[email protected]...

    Malte Runz <[email protected]> wrote in
    news:[email protected]:

    On Fri, 16 May 2025 12:16:47 +1000, "Andrew W" <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    "Mitchell Holman"  wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in
    news:1005t7r$3cnf6$[email protected]:

    "Mitchell Holman"  wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in
    news:1003rh6$2v9s5$[email protected]:



    We didn't find our first exoplanet until the 1990s!


    Um, only according to mainstream scientists who are funded by
    government grants. They have to keep quiet or they lose their
    funding and reputations.




    Why would government cover up a scientific
    discovery of an exoplanet?


    Simple. Because then the world would find out the earth's and
    humanity's true history, and that would lead to them losing power
    and profits.



      Has that happened since the discovery
    of hundreds of exoplanets?


    Discovery of exoplanets is only the first step. They're still not
    telling the people the important details like the earth's true history >>>> and who/what else is in this galaxy.

    I take it that you know many of the details. You know Earth's true
    history and a lot of other facts about what goes on in this galaxy.

    But instead of sharing that information, and your sources, with us,
    you'll spend post after post coming up with excuses for not doing it.

    'You're too lazy to do your own research.' 'I can't list all the
    information I've spent decades finding.' 'The deep state has destroyed
    the evidence.' 'You only believe MSM.' 'You're mind controlled by the
    elites.' 'Why do you even need evidence?'

    On and on it goes. We been through this many times before, so unless
    you have some new material, I'll suggest you go fuck yourself. Cool?



       It is depressing there are so many
    conspiracy-behind-everything kooks like
    him.  Their lives re so unremarkable and
    enpty they invent a "special knowledge"
    they think elevates them above everyone
    else.


    But scientists never invent new theories to become prominent and get government grants?
    Every ten years or so they throw out most of their theories and make up
    new ones. But you still trust them that only they have the 'facts'.

    Nonsense! Scientists invent new theories to explain the new facts observed as the instruments they use become better and find
    facts inexplicable in terms of the old theories.

    bliss

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mitchell Holman@21:1/5 to Andrew W on Sat May 17 01:48:04 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in
    news:1008hi7$fig$[email protected]:

    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message news:[email protected]...

    Malte Runz <[email protected]> wrote in >>news:[email protected]:

    On Fri, 16 May 2025 12:16:47 +1000, "Andrew W" <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message >>>>news:[email protected]...

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>news:1005t7r$3cnf6$[email protected]:

    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>>news:1003rh6$2v9s5$[email protected]:



    We didn't find our first exoplanet until the 1990s!


    Um, only according to mainstream scientists who are funded by
    government grants. They have to keep quiet or they lose their
    funding and reputations.




    Why would government cover up a scientific
    discovery of an exoplanet?


    Simple. Because then the world would find out the earth's and
    humanity's true history, and that would lead to them losing power
    and profits.



    Has that happened since the discovery
    of hundreds of exoplanets?


    Discovery of exoplanets is only the first step. They're still not >>>>telling the people the important details like the earth's true
    history and who/what else is in this galaxy.

    I take it that you know many of the details. You know Earth's true
    history and a lot of other facts about what goes on in this galaxy.

    But instead of sharing that information, and your sources, with us,
    you'll spend post after post coming up with excuses for not doing
    it.

    'You're too lazy to do your own research.' 'I can't list all the
    information I've spent decades finding.' 'The deep state has
    destroyed the evidence.' 'You only believe MSM.' 'You're mind
    controlled by the elites.' 'Why do you even need evidence?'

    On and on it goes. We been through this many times before, so unless
    you have some new material, I'll suggest you go fuck yourself. Cool?



    It is depressing there are so many
    conspiracy-behind-everything kooks like
    him. Their lives re so unremarkable and
    enpty they invent a "special knowledge"
    they think elevates them above everyone
    else.


    But scientists never invent new theories to become prominent and get government grants?


    You know that scientific grant requests
    get previewed by other scientists, no?



    Every ten years or so they throw out most of their theories and make
    up new ones. But you still trust them that only they have the 'facts'.


    Bingo. That is where Nobel prizes come
    from, disproving a previously held theory
    with a new one, backed by evidence. We
    thought the world was static, then we
    discovered plate techtonics, we thought
    the moon was dead, then we discoved
    moonquakes, we thought gravity was just
    attractive, then we discovered it can
    repel things. Ain't science grand?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew W@21:1/5 to All on Sat May 17 11:53:58 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    "jojo" wrote in message news:[email protected]...

    JTEM wrote:
    On 5/16/25 11:15 AM, jojo wrote:

    sooo... aliens are a theoretical construct??

    It seems implausible that you could fail so miserably at
    discerning the context. I have to assume that you suffer
    from a narcissistic personality disorder, at the very
    least, and are thus compelled to obfuscate.


    And there's a lot of that that goes on in these groups.



    To anyone else: The claim is that aliens are here, present
    in our solar system, not merely existing.


    okay, super. so its a claim, and not something either theoretically
    possible nor probable? right?


    Only if you look at mainstream media, mainstream science and governments and nothing else.


    --
    “We own everyone of any significance in the major media.” CIA Director William Colby
    “We’ll know when our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the
    American people believes is false.” CIA Director William Casey

    Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
    the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mitchell Holman@21:1/5 to Andrew W on Sat May 17 01:49:32 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in news:1008g4q$8q9$[email protected]:

    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message news:[email protected]...

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in
    news:100676l$3i7jt$[email protected]:

    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>news:1005t7r$3cnf6$[email protected]:

    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>news:1003rh6$2v9s5$[email protected]:



    We didn't find our first exoplanet until the 1990s!


    Um, only according to mainstream scientists who are funded by
    government grants. They have to keep quiet or they lose their
    funding and reputations.




    Why would government cover up a scientific
    discovery of an exoplanet?


    Simple. Because then the world would find out the earth's and
    humanity's true history, and that would lead to them losing power
    and profits.



    Has that happened since the discovery
    of hundreds of exoplanets?


    Discovery of exoplanets is only the first step. They're still not
    telling the people the important details like the earth's true
    history
    and who/what else is in this galaxy.


    OK, it is a slow news day,
    let's explore that first one.

    What is Earth's "true history"
    that "they" are not telling us?


    You will learn that when you're ready, if you live that long.


    I knew you would run away.




    Clue: Humanity has never been alone.


    Who say it was?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew W@21:1/5 to Mitchell Holman on Sat May 17 12:10:34 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message news:[email protected]...

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in news:1008g4q$8q9$[email protected]:

    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in >>>news:100676l$3i7jt$[email protected]:

    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>news:1005t7r$3cnf6$[email protected]:

    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>>news:1003rh6$2v9s5$[email protected]:



    We didn't find our first exoplanet until the 1990s!


    Um, only according to mainstream scientists who are funded by
    government grants. They have to keep quiet or they lose their
    funding and reputations.




    Why would government cover up a scientific
    discovery of an exoplanet?


    Simple. Because then the world would find out the earth's and
    humanity's true history, and that would lead to them losing power
    and profits.



    Has that happened since the discovery
    of hundreds of exoplanets?


    Discovery of exoplanets is only the first step. They're still not
    telling the people the important details like the earth's true
    history
    and who/what else is in this galaxy.


    OK, it is a slow news day,
    let's explore that first one.

    What is Earth's "true history"
    that "they" are not telling us?


    You will learn that when you're ready, if you live that long.


    I knew you would run away.


    Yes every smart person runs away from dumb jerks.





    Clue: Humanity has never been alone.


    Who say it was?


    The governments for many decades. Except for the 'microbes' on Mars they boasted about finding/theorising yonks ago.


    --
    “We own everyone of any significance in the major media.” CIA Director William Colby
    “We’ll know when our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the
    American people believes is false.” CIA Director William Casey

    Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
    the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew W@21:1/5 to Mitchell Holman on Sat May 17 12:19:57 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message news:[email protected]...

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in
    news:1008hi7$fig$[email protected]:

    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...

    Malte Runz <[email protected]> wrote in >>>news:[email protected]:

    On Fri, 16 May 2025 12:16:47 +1000, "Andrew W" <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message >>>>>news:[email protected]...

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>news:1005t7r$3cnf6$[email protected]:

    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...


    Has that happened since the discovery
    of hundreds of exoplanets?


    Discovery of exoplanets is only the first step. They're still not >>>>>telling the people the important details like the earth's true >>>>>history and who/what else is in this galaxy.

    I take it that you know many of the details. You know Earth's true
    history and a lot of other facts about what goes on in this galaxy.

    But instead of sharing that information, and your sources, with us,
    you'll spend post after post coming up with excuses for not doing
    it.

    'You're too lazy to do your own research.' 'I can't list all the
    information I've spent decades finding.' 'The deep state has
    destroyed the evidence.' 'You only believe MSM.' 'You're mind
    controlled by the elites.' 'Why do you even need evidence?'

    On and on it goes. We been through this many times before, so unless
    you have some new material, I'll suggest you go fuck yourself. Cool?



    It is depressing there are so many
    conspiracy-behind-everything kooks like
    him. Their lives re so unremarkable and
    enpty they invent a "special knowledge"
    they think elevates them above everyone
    else.


    But scientists never invent new theories to become prominent and get
    government grants?


    You know that scientific grant requests
    get previewed by other scientists, no?


    And they are more trustworthy and have nothing to gain? It's basically a
    club.




    Every ten years or so they throw out most of their theories and make
    up new ones. But you still trust them that only they have the 'facts'.


    Bingo. That is where Nobel prizes come
    from, disproving a previously held theory
    with a new one, backed by evidence.


    Thin evidence that's open to interpretation. But they get their money. And Nobel prizes are another motivation and fame generator.



    We
    thought the world was static, then we
    discovered plate techtonics, we thought
    the moon was dead, then we discoved
    moonquakes, we thought gravity was just
    attractive, then we discovered it can
    repel things. Ain't science grand?


    So mainstream scientists used to be really dumb. Now they're less dumb.
    Many ancient people knew more about the stars as depicted in wall art than
    many later scientists.


    --
    “We own everyone of any significance in the major media.” CIA Director William Colby
    “We’ll know when our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the
    American people believes is false.” CIA Director William Casey

    Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
    the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Titus G@21:1/5 to Bob Casanova on Sat May 17 16:05:43 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    On 17/05/25 05:41, Bob Casanova wrote:
    snip

    And since I'm reading this in sci.skeptic, and since this
    crap is different woo-woo crap and has zip to do with claims
    of the paranormal, I'll sign off this thread.

    I'm reading from sf.written where there hasn't been a continuous active
    loony troll for a while and I am temporarily fascinated by the woo-woo
    crap. I think the thread will peter out before the kill file will need
    to be employed.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Titus G@21:1/5 to All on Sat May 17 16:06:21 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    On 5/16/25 16:25, Andrew W wrote:
    "Mitchell Holman"  wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    snip
       It is depressing there are so many
    conspiracy-behind-everything kooks like
    him.  Their lives re so unremarkable and
    enpty they invent a "special knowledge"
    they think elevates them above everyone
    else.


    But scientists never invent new theories to become prominent and get
    government grants?

    Yes, of course, but they form clubs, (Physics, Chemistry etc), and spend
    years learning the secret codes disguised as language that are so
    esoteric and complicated that only they can understand them. Obviously a
    long term plan that involved many decades of planning to hold the power
    they have today.

    But self-elevated Kooks just blather on usenet.

    Every ten years or so they throw out most of their theories and make
    up new ones. But you still trust them that only they have the 'facts'.

    As hesitant as I am to question your wisdom and knowledge, will there
    still be exactly 283 aliens here in 10 years time and will future
    governments lie?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Titus G@21:1/5 to Bobbie Sellers on Sat May 17 16:07:21 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    On 17/05/25 13:19, Bobbie Sellers wrote:
    On 5/16/25 16:25, Andrew W wrote:
    snip

    But scientists never invent new theories to become prominent and get
    government grants?
    Every ten years or so they throw out most of their theories and make
    up new ones. But you still trust them that only they have the 'facts'.

        Nonsense! Scientists invent new theories to explain the new facts observed as the instruments they use become better and find
    facts inexplicable in terms of the old theories.

        bliss

    Yes. And there are not a lot of complicated new scientific instruments
    that a small totally self sufficient workforce of 283 aliens in
    mountainous areas can produce every ten years.

    kook

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew W@21:1/5 to Bobbie Sellers on Sat May 17 16:04:56 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    "Bobbie Sellers" wrote in message news:1008o6h$1345$[email protected]...



    On 5/16/25 16:25, Andrew W wrote:
    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...

    Malte Runz <[email protected]> wrote in
    news:[email protected]:

    On Fri, 16 May 2025 12:16:47 +1000, "Andrew W" <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in
    news:1005t7r$3cnf6$[email protected]:

    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in
    news:1003rh6$2v9s5$[email protected]:



    We didn't find our first exoplanet until the 1990s!


    Um, only according to mainstream scientists who are funded by >>>>>>>>> government grants. They have to keep quiet or they lose their >>>>>>>>> funding and reputations.




    Why would government cover up a scientific
    discovery of an exoplanet?


    Simple. Because then the world would find out the earth's and
    humanity's true history, and that would lead to them losing power >>>>>>> and profits.



    Has that happened since the discovery
    of hundreds of exoplanets?


    Discovery of exoplanets is only the first step. They're still not
    telling the people the important details like the earth's true history >>>>> and who/what else is in this galaxy.

    I take it that you know many of the details. You know Earth's true
    history and a lot of other facts about what goes on in this galaxy.

    But instead of sharing that information, and your sources, with us,
    you'll spend post after post coming up with excuses for not doing it.

    'You're too lazy to do your own research.' 'I can't list all the
    information I've spent decades finding.' 'The deep state has destroyed >>>> the evidence.' 'You only believe MSM.' 'You're mind controlled by the
    elites.' 'Why do you even need evidence?'

    On and on it goes. We been through this many times before, so unless
    you have some new material, I'll suggest you go fuck yourself. Cool?



    It is depressing there are so many
    conspiracy-behind-everything kooks like
    him. Their lives re so unremarkable and
    enpty they invent a "special knowledge"
    they think elevates them above everyone
    else.


    But scientists never invent new theories to become prominent and get
    government grants?
    Every ten years or so they throw out most of their theories and make up
    new ones. But you still trust them that only they have the 'facts'.

    Nonsense! Scientists invent new theories to explain the new facts
    observed as the instruments they use become better and find
    facts inexplicable in terms of the old theories.


    A lot of facts some scientists declared in the past were not facts in the
    first place. And a lot of present ones will not be in the future. How do I
    know that? I know human ego and many scientists have been caught passing off lies even recently.


    --
    “We own everyone of any significance in the major media.” CIA Director William Colby
    “We’ll know when our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the
    American people believes is false.” CIA Director William Casey

    Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
    the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Malte Runz@21:1/5 to All on Sat May 17 10:20:53 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    On Sat, 17 May 2025 09:17:46 +1000, "Andrew W" <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    "Malte Runz" wrote in message >news:[email protected]...

    On Fri, 16 May 2025 12:16:47 +1000, "Andrew W" <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message >>>news:[email protected]...

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>news:1005t7r$3cnf6$[email protected]:

    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>news:1003rh6$2v9s5$[email protected]:



    We didn't find our first exoplanet until the 1990s!


    Um, only according to mainstream scientists who are funded by
    government grants. They have to keep quiet or they lose their funding >>>>>>> and reputations.




    Why would government cover up a scientific
    discovery of an exoplanet?


    Simple. Because then the world would find out the earth's and
    humanity's
    true history, and that would lead to them losing power and profits.



    Has that happened since the discovery
    of hundreds of exoplanets?


    Discovery of exoplanets is only the first step. They're still not telling >>>the people the important details like the earth's true history and >>>who/what
    else is in this galaxy.

    I take it that you know many of the details. You know Earth's true
    history and a lot of other facts about what goes on in this galaxy.

    But instead of sharing that information, and your sources, with us,
    you'll spend post after post coming up with excuses for not doing it.


    Again you want info from me, because you have none of your own. ...

    See below:

    'You're too lazy to do your own research.'

    ... But you're
    not even truly interested in this subject.
    Why would anyone have to go to the trouble of sharing information with jerks >like you who think with their emotions and can only handle following >authorities?

    See below:

    'You only believe MSM.'


    'You're too lazy to do your own research.' 'I can't list all the >>information I've spent decades finding.' 'The deep state has destroyed
    the evidence.' 'You only believe MSM.' 'You're mind controlled by the >>elites.' 'Why do you even need evidence?'


    All true.

    I know. It's all you ever had and we've hear your excuses a million
    times.



    On and on it goes. We been through this many times before, so unless
    you have some new material, I'll suggest you go fuck yourself. Cool?


    Our governments never have anything new on this subject but you would never >dare tell them that. You have never realised that they are full of excuses >and peanut offerings. ...

    See above:

    'The deep state has destroyed the evidence.'


    ... You always just point fingers at ordinary people.

    But you're not ordinary, are you?

    --
    Malte Runz

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott Dorsey@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Sat May 17 07:44:21 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    In article <10091ue$6ems$[email protected]>, Titus G <[email protected]> wrote: >On 17/05/25 05:41, Bob Casanova wrote:
    snip

    And since I'm reading this in sci.skeptic, and since this
    crap is different woo-woo crap and has zip to do with claims
    of the paranormal, I'll sign off this thread.

    I'm reading from sf.written where there hasn't been a continuous active
    loony troll for a while and I am temporarily fascinated by the woo-woo
    crap. I think the thread will peter out before the kill file will need
    to be employed.

    I am amused at all the railing against the "mainstream media" in a thread
    about aliens watching television, which is mainstream media at it's finest.

    Gomer Pyle debuted in 1964, sixty-one years ago. This means it is now
    visible to aliens as far away as 6 Ceti. With crap like that on view,
    is it any wonder that they have made no attempt to contact us? And only
    a year later Green Acres came out... just imagine what the folks at
    Sirius and Procyon must think of us.
    --scott
    --
    "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew W@21:1/5 to Malte Runz on Sat May 17 21:35:47 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    "Malte Runz" wrote in message news:[email protected]...

    On Sat, 17 May 2025 09:17:46 +1000, "Andrew W" <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    "Malte Runz" wrote in message >>news:[email protected]...

    On Fri, 16 May 2025 12:16:47 +1000, "Andrew W" <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message >>>>news:[email protected]...

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>news:1005t7r$3cnf6$[email protected]:

    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>>news:1003rh6$2v9s5$[email protected]:



    We didn't find our first exoplanet until the 1990s!


    Um, only according to mainstream scientists who are funded by
    government grants. They have to keep quiet or they lose their
    funding
    and reputations.




    Why would government cover up a scientific
    discovery of an exoplanet?


    Simple. Because then the world would find out the earth's and
    humanity's
    true history, and that would lead to them losing power and profits. >>>>>>


    Has that happened since the discovery
    of hundreds of exoplanets?


    Discovery of exoplanets is only the first step. They're still not >>>>telling
    the people the important details like the earth's true history and >>>>who/what
    else is in this galaxy.

    I take it that you know many of the details. You know Earth's true >>>history and a lot of other facts about what goes on in this galaxy.

    But instead of sharing that information, and your sources, with us, >>>you'll spend post after post coming up with excuses for not doing it.


    Again you want info from me, because you have none of your own. ...

    See below:

    'You're too lazy to do your own research.'

    ... But you're
    not even truly interested in this subject.
    Why would anyone have to go to the trouble of sharing information with >>jerks
    like you who think with their emotions and can only handle following >>authorities?

    See below:

    'You only believe MSM.'


    'You're too lazy to do your own research.' 'I can't list all the >>>information I've spent decades finding.' 'The deep state has destroyed >>>the evidence.' 'You only believe MSM.' 'You're mind controlled by the >>>elites.' 'Why do you even need evidence?'


    All true.

    I know. It's all you ever had and we've hear your excuses a million
    times.


    It's all I ever need with you.
    You see "excuses" but you have nothing to offer.




    On and on it goes. We been through this many times before, so unless
    you have some new material, I'll suggest you go fuck yourself. Cool?


    Our governments never have anything new on this subject but you would
    never
    dare tell them that. You have never realised that they are full of excuses >>and peanut offerings. ...

    See above:

    'The deep state has destroyed the evidence.'


    ... You always just point fingers at ordinary people.

    But you're not ordinary, are you?


    Thinking outside the box and questioning authority, no I guess not.
    In history many who publically questioned the narrative were derided and persecuted. And later they were heralded.


    --
    “We own everyone of any significance in the major media.” CIA Director William Colby
    “We’ll know when our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the
    American people believes is false.” CIA Director William Casey

    Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
    the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mitchell Holman@21:1/5 to Andrew W on Sat May 17 13:08:32 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in news:1008r6v$5ro1$1@dont-
    email.me:

    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message news:[email protected]...

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in news:1008g4q$8q9$1@dont-
    email.me:

    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>news:100676l$3i7jt$[email protected]:

    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>news:1005t7r$3cnf6$[email protected]:

    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>>>news:1003rh6$2v9s5$[email protected]:



    We didn't find our first exoplanet until the 1990s!


    Um, only according to mainstream scientists who are funded by >>>>>>>>> government grants. They have to keep quiet or they lose their >>>>>>>>> funding and reputations.




    Why would government cover up a scientific
    discovery of an exoplanet?


    Simple. Because then the world would find out the earth's and
    humanity's true history, and that would lead to them losing power >>>>>>> and profits.



    Has that happened since the discovery
    of hundreds of exoplanets?


    Discovery of exoplanets is only the first step. They're still not
    telling the people the important details like the earth's true
    history
    and who/what else is in this galaxy.


    OK, it is a slow news day,
    let's explore that first one.

    What is Earth's "true history"
    that "they" are not telling us?


    You will learn that when you're ready, if you live that long.


    I knew you would run away.


    Yes every smart person runs away from dumb jerks.


    "....important details like the earth's
    true history"

    Still waiting.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From jojo@21:1/5 to Andrew W on Sat May 17 16:29:13 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    Andrew W wrote:
    "jojo"  wrote in message news:[email protected]...

    JTEM wrote:
    On 5/16/25 11:15 AM, jojo wrote:

    sooo... aliens are a theoretical construct??

    It seems implausible that you could fail so miserably at
    discerning the context. I have to assume that you suffer
    from a narcissistic personality disorder, at the very
    least, and are thus compelled to obfuscate.


    And there's a lot of that that goes on in these groups.



    To anyone else:  The claim is that aliens are here, present
    in our solar system, not merely existing.


    okay, super. so its a claim, and not something either
    theoretically possible nor probable? right?


    Only if you look at mainstream media, mainstream science and
    governments and nothing else.


    i am a ufo fan, even though elon said that there is no evidence
    and i believe he is in the best position to know, i still feel we
    are not exactly alone here.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mitchell Holman@21:1/5 to Andrew W on Sat May 17 17:51:34 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in
    news:1008q7s$1rnm$[email protected]:

    "jojo" wrote in message news:[email protected]...

    JTEM wrote:
    On 5/16/25 11:15 AM, jojo wrote:

    sooo... aliens are a theoretical construct??

    It seems implausible that you could fail so miserably at
    discerning the context. I have to assume that you suffer
    from a narcissistic personality disorder, at the very
    least, and are thus compelled to obfuscate.


    And there's a lot of that that goes on in these groups.



    To anyone else: The claim is that aliens are here, present
    in our solar system, not merely existing.


    okay, super. so its a claim, and not something either theoretically >>possible nor probable? right?


    Only if you look at mainstream media, mainstream science and
    governments and nothing else.


    What is "non-mainstream" science?

    Creation science?

    Christian science?

    Metaphysical science?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bobbie Sellers@21:1/5 to Andrew W on Sat May 17 10:31:18 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    On 5/16/25 19:19, Andrew W wrote:
    "Mitchell Holman"  wrote in message news:[email protected]...

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in
    news:1008hi7$fig$[email protected]:

    "Mitchell Holman"  wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...

    Malte Runz <[email protected]> wrote in
    news:[email protected]:

    On Fri, 16 May 2025 12:16:47 +1000, "Andrew W" <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    "Mitchell Holman"  wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in
    news:1005t7r$3cnf6$[email protected]:

    "Mitchell Holman"  wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...


      Has that happened since the discovery
    of hundreds of exoplanets?


    Discovery of exoplanets is only the first step. They're still not
    telling the people the important details like the earth's true
    history and who/what else is in this galaxy.

    I take it that you know many of the details. You know Earth's true
    history and a lot of other facts about what goes on in this galaxy.

    But instead of sharing that information, and your sources, with us,
    you'll spend post after post coming up with excuses for not doing
    it.

    'You're too lazy to do your own research.' 'I can't list all the
    information I've spent decades finding.' 'The deep state has
    destroyed the evidence.' 'You only believe MSM.' 'You're mind
    controlled by the elites.' 'Why do you even need evidence?'

    On and on it goes. We been through this many times before, so unless >>>>> you have some new material, I'll suggest you go fuck yourself. Cool?



       It is depressing there are so many
    conspiracy-behind-everything kooks like
    him.  Their lives re so unremarkable and
    enpty they invent a "special knowledge"
    they think elevates them above everyone
    else.


    But scientists never invent new theories to become prominent and get
    government grants?


       You know that scientific grant requests
    get previewed by other scientists, no?


    And they are more trustworthy and have nothing to gain? It's basically a club.

    A very internally competitive club where the scientists try to find flaws in data, its acquistion, and the logic usually mathematical to reject the new theories. What they have to gain is the sharing of possibly accurate data
    and ideas. Generally until an experiment or data acquistion mode is tested
    in another laboratory it is not considered proven or the theory relating to
    it is considered for acceptance.

    Yes it takes years to gain the skills necessary for scientific and/or technological
    research to be done but you would not be sitting whereever you are and
    typ[ng into your computer if poeple did not no devote themselves to such studies. I will remind you or inform you if you did not know that when I
    was young computers were mostly human beings who devoted themselves
    to mathematics.

    Computers then became gigantic electrical machines then electronic machines which materials reseach managed to reduce to much handier
    sizes. You are using the results of scientific research and many
    theoretical
    changes to communicate so yoiu should consider that seriously when
    you come off with your half-baked ideas about science and scientists.

    Every ten years or so they throw out most of their theories and make
    up new ones. But you still trust them that only they have the 'facts'.


       Bingo. That is where Nobel prizes come
    from, disproving a previously held theory
    with a new one, backed by evidence.


    Thin evidence that's open to interpretation. But they get their money.
    And Nobel prizes are another motivation and fame generator.



    We
    thought the world was static, then we
    discovered plate techtonics, we thought
    the moon was dead, then we discoved
    moonquakes, we thought gravity was just
    attractive, then we discovered it can
    repel things. Ain't science grand?


    So mainstream scientists used to be really dumb. Now they're less dumb.
    Many ancient people knew more about the stars as depicted in wall art
    than many later scientists.


    The ancients built non-optical observatories to study the
    heavens with the unaided eye.
    But they had no idea of the nature of the Sun or of other stars as far
    as we know. Some figured out the Earth was more spherical than
    flat but no great knowlege of the stars but the knowlege of their
    obsevation. Mostly they did observations to construct astrological
    charts and to make sure of the Quarter-Days i.e. Eqinoxes and
    Solstices. Which is what a lot of ancient monuments were constructed
    to determine.

    bliss- Dell 7730 Precision- PCLinuxOS 2025.05- Linux 6.6.90- Plasma 5.27.11

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mitchell Holman@21:1/5 to Scott Dorsey on Sat May 17 17:54:08 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    [email protected] (Scott Dorsey) wrote in
    news:1009sql$o2o$[email protected]:

    In article <10091ue$6ems$[email protected]>, Titus G
    <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 17/05/25 05:41, Bob Casanova wrote:
    snip

    And since I'm reading this in sci.skeptic, and since this
    crap is different woo-woo crap and has zip to do with claims
    of the paranormal, I'll sign off this thread.

    I'm reading from sf.written where there hasn't been a continuous
    active loony troll for a while and I am temporarily fascinated by the >>woo-woo crap. I think the thread will peter out before the kill file
    will need to be employed.

    I am amused at all the railing against the "mainstream media" in a
    thread about aliens watching television, which is mainstream media at
    it's finest.

    Gomer Pyle debuted in 1964, sixty-one years ago. This means it is now visible to aliens as far away as 6 Ceti. With crap like that on view,
    is it any wonder that they have made no attempt to contact us? And
    only a year later Green Acres came out... just imagine what the folks
    at Sirius and Procyon must think of us.
    --scott


    At least they get to watch
    Rocky and Bullwinkle and Dobia Gillis.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mitchell Holman@21:1/5 to Andrew W on Sat May 17 17:56:32 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in
    news:10098uc$7vri$[email protected]:




    A lot of facts some scientists declared in the past were not facts in
    the first place. And a lot of present ones will not be in the future.


    You make that sound like a negative.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew W@21:1/5 to Mitchell Holman on Sun May 18 08:39:45 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message news:[email protected]...

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in
    news:1008q7s$1rnm$[email protected]:

    "jojo" wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...

    JTEM wrote:
    On 5/16/25 11:15 AM, jojo wrote:

    sooo... aliens are a theoretical construct??

    It seems implausible that you could fail so miserably at
    discerning the context. I have to assume that you suffer
    from a narcissistic personality disorder, at the very
    least, and are thus compelled to obfuscate.


    And there's a lot of that that goes on in these groups.



    To anyone else: The claim is that aliens are here, present
    in our solar system, not merely existing.


    okay, super. so its a claim, and not something either theoretically >>>possible nor probable? right?


    Only if you look at mainstream media, mainstream science and
    governments and nothing else.


    What is "non-mainstream" science?

    Creation science?


    No


    Christian science?


    Same thing.


    Metaphysical science?


    You are clueless. It's any science that's not suppressed by governments and certain celebrity scientists.
    Some of it is metaphysical yes.


    --
    “We own everyone of any significance in the major media.” CIA Director William Colby
    “We’ll know when our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the
    American people believes is false.” CIA Director William Casey

    Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
    the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew W@21:1/5 to All on Sun May 18 08:35:44 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    "jojo" wrote in message news:[email protected]...

    Andrew W wrote:
    "jojo" wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...

    JTEM wrote:
    On 5/16/25 11:15 AM, jojo wrote:

    sooo... aliens are a theoretical construct??

    It seems implausible that you could fail so miserably at
    discerning the context. I have to assume that you suffer
    from a narcissistic personality disorder, at the very
    least, and are thus compelled to obfuscate.


    And there's a lot of that that goes on in these groups.



    To anyone else: The claim is that aliens are here, present
    in our solar system, not merely existing.


    okay, super. so its a claim, and not something either theoretically
    possible nor probable? right?


    Only if you look at mainstream media, mainstream science and governments
    and nothing else.


    i am a ufo fan, even though elon said that there is no evidence and i
    believe he is in the best position to know, i still feel we are not exactly >alone here.


    No, Elon Musk has never been in space so he can't know. And no ET is going
    to show themselves to his old tech rockets.


    --
    “We own everyone of any significance in the major media.” CIA Director William Colby
    “We’ll know when our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the
    American people believes is false.” CIA Director William Casey

    Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
    the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew W@21:1/5 to Mitchell Holman on Sun May 18 08:43:13 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message news:[email protected]...

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in news:1008r6v$5ro1$1@dont-
    email.me:

    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in news:1008g4q$8q9$1@dont-
    email.me:

    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>news:100676l$3i7jt$[email protected]:

    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>>news:1005t7r$3cnf6$[email protected]:

    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>>>>news:1003rh6$2v9s5$[email protected]:



    We didn't find our first exoplanet until the 1990s!


    Um, only according to mainstream scientists who are funded by >>>>>>>>>> government grants. They have to keep quiet or they lose their >>>>>>>>>> funding and reputations.




    Why would government cover up a scientific
    discovery of an exoplanet?


    Simple. Because then the world would find out the earth's and
    humanity's true history, and that would lead to them losing power >>>>>>>> and profits.



    Has that happened since the discovery
    of hundreds of exoplanets?


    Discovery of exoplanets is only the first step. They're still not
    telling the people the important details like the earth's true >>>history
    and who/what else is in this galaxy.


    OK, it is a slow news day,
    let's explore that first one.

    What is Earth's "true history"
    that "they" are not telling us?


    You will learn that when you're ready, if you live that long.


    I knew you would run away.


    Yes every smart person runs away from dumb jerks.


    "....important details like the earth's
    true history"

    Still waiting.


    Why do you want to know that?


    --
    “We own everyone of any significance in the major media.” CIA Director William Colby
    “We’ll know when our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the
    American people believes is false.” CIA Director William Casey

    Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
    the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew W@21:1/5 to Mitchell Holman on Sun May 18 08:46:33 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message news:[email protected]...

    [email protected] (Scott Dorsey) wrote in
    news:1009sql$o2o$[email protected]:

    In article <10091ue$6ems$[email protected]>, Titus G
    <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 17/05/25 05:41, Bob Casanova wrote:
    snip

    And since I'm reading this in sci.skeptic, and since this
    crap is different woo-woo crap and has zip to do with claims
    of the paranormal, I'll sign off this thread.

    I'm reading from sf.written where there hasn't been a continuous
    active loony troll for a while and I am temporarily fascinated by the >>>woo-woo crap. I think the thread will peter out before the kill file
    will need to be employed.

    I am amused at all the railing against the "mainstream media" in a
    thread about aliens watching television, which is mainstream media at
    it's finest.

    Gomer Pyle debuted in 1964, sixty-one years ago. This means it is now
    visible to aliens as far away as 6 Ceti. With crap like that on view,
    is it any wonder that they have made no attempt to contact us? And
    only a year later Green Acres came out... just imagine what the folks
    at Sirius and Procyon must think of us.
    --scott


    At least they get to watch
    Rocky and Bullwinkle and Dobia Gillis.


    You can't even spell Dobie.


    --
    “We own everyone of any significance in the major media.” CIA Director William Colby
    “We’ll know when our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the
    American people believes is false.” CIA Director William Casey

    Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
    the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew W@21:1/5 to Mitchell Holman on Sun May 18 09:18:15 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message news:[email protected]...

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in
    news:10098uc$7vri$[email protected]:




    A lot of facts some scientists declared in the past were not facts in
    the first place. And a lot of present ones will not be in the future.


    You make that sound like a negative.


    It sounds like you're totally entranced by popular science.


    --
    “We own everyone of any significance in the major media.” CIA Director William Colby
    “We’ll know when our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the
    American people believes is false.” CIA Director William Casey

    Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
    the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew W@21:1/5 to Bobbie Sellers on Sun May 18 09:34:13 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    "Bobbie Sellers" wrote in message news:100ah56$fsq2$[email protected]...



    On 5/16/25 19:19, Andrew W wrote:
    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in
    news:1008hi7$fig$[email protected]:

    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...

    Malte Runz <[email protected]> wrote in
    news:[email protected]:

    On Fri, 16 May 2025 12:16:47 +1000, "Andrew W" <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote:

    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in
    news:1005t7r$3cnf6$[email protected]:

    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...


    Has that happened since the discovery
    of hundreds of exoplanets?


    Discovery of exoplanets is only the first step. They're still not >>>>>>> telling the people the important details like the earth's true
    history and who/what else is in this galaxy.

    I take it that you know many of the details. You know Earth's true >>>>>> history and a lot of other facts about what goes on in this galaxy. >>>>>>
    But instead of sharing that information, and your sources, with us, >>>>>> you'll spend post after post coming up with excuses for not doing
    it.

    'You're too lazy to do your own research.' 'I can't list all the
    information I've spent decades finding.' 'The deep state has
    destroyed the evidence.' 'You only believe MSM.' 'You're mind
    controlled by the elites.' 'Why do you even need evidence?'

    On and on it goes. We been through this many times before, so unless >>>>>> you have some new material, I'll suggest you go fuck yourself. Cool? >>>>>


    It is depressing there are so many
    conspiracy-behind-everything kooks like
    him. Their lives re so unremarkable and
    enpty they invent a "special knowledge"
    they think elevates them above everyone
    else.


    But scientists never invent new theories to become prominent and get
    government grants?


    You know that scientific grant requests
    get previewed by other scientists, no?


    And they are more trustworthy and have nothing to gain? It's basically a
    club.

    A very internally competitive club where the scientists try to find flaws
    in
    data, its acquistion, and the logic usually mathematical to reject the new >theories. What they have to gain is the sharing of possibly accurate data >and ideas. Generally until an experiment or data acquistion mode is tested >in another laboratory it is not considered proven or the theory relating to >it is considered for acceptance.


    Yes that does happen, but what also happens is the establishments deride and suppress discoveries that would ruin their narratives.
    Much of the science debates that go on are also to distract the masses and muddy the waters.



    Yes it takes years to gain the skills necessary for scientific and/or >technological
    research to be done but you would not be sitting whereever you are and
    typ[ng into your computer if poeple did not no devote themselves to such >studies. I will remind you or inform you if you did not know that when I
    was young computers were mostly human beings who devoted themselves
    to mathematics.

    Computers then became gigantic electrical machines then electronic
    machines which materials reseach managed to reduce to much handier
    sizes. You are using the results of scientific research and many
    theoretical
    changes to communicate so yoiu should consider that seriously when
    you come off with your half-baked ideas about science and scientists.


    The establishments allowed computer tech, television tech etc., basically entertainment, mainly to occupy people with crap and video games. Busy
    people don't ask questions. Governments hate questions.



    Every ten years or so they throw out most of their theories and make
    up new ones. But you still trust them that only they have the 'facts'. >>>>

    Bingo. That is where Nobel prizes come
    from, disproving a previously held theory
    with a new one, backed by evidence.


    Thin evidence that's open to interpretation. But they get their money.
    And Nobel prizes are another motivation and fame generator.



    We
    thought the world was static, then we
    discovered plate techtonics, we thought
    the moon was dead, then we discoved
    moonquakes, we thought gravity was just
    attractive, then we discovered it can
    repel things. Ain't science grand?


    So mainstream scientists used to be really dumb. Now they're less dumb.
    Many ancient people knew more about the stars as depicted in wall art
    than many later scientists.


    The ancients built non-optical observatories to study the
    heavens with the unaided eye.
    But they had no idea of the nature of the Sun or of other stars as far
    as we know. Some figured out the Earth was more spherical than
    flat but no great knowlege of the stars but the knowlege of their
    obsevation. Mostly they did observations to construct astrological
    charts and to make sure of the Quarter-Days i.e. Eqinoxes and
    Solstices. Which is what a lot of ancient monuments were constructed
    to determine.


    You don't know that. There is archaeological evidence that ancient humans
    were contacted by advanced ETs who imparted advanced celestial knowledge, including energy generation, healing tech etc.


    --
    “We own everyone of any significance in the major media.” CIA Director William Colby
    “We’ll know when our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the
    American people believes is false.” CIA Director William Casey

    Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
    the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mitchell Holman@21:1/5 to Andrew W on Sun May 18 01:33:51 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in news:100b5fq$kdrl$[email protected]:

    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message news:[email protected]...

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in
    news:10098uc$7vri$[email protected]:




    A lot of facts some scientists declared in the past were not facts in
    the first place. And a lot of present ones will not be in the future.


    You make that sound like a negative.


    It sounds like you're totally entranced by popular science.




    Is there another kind?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mitchell Holman@21:1/5 to Andrew W on Sun May 18 01:36:45 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in
    news:100b37l$jvfs$[email protected]:

    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message news:[email protected]...

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in
    news:1008q7s$1rnm$[email protected]:

    "jojo" wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...

    JTEM wrote:
    On 5/16/25 11:15 AM, jojo wrote:

    sooo... aliens are a theoretical construct??

    It seems implausible that you could fail so miserably at
    discerning the context. I have to assume that you suffer
    from a narcissistic personality disorder, at the very
    least, and are thus compelled to obfuscate.


    And there's a lot of that that goes on in these groups.



    To anyone else: The claim is that aliens are here, present
    in our solar system, not merely existing.


    okay, super. so its a claim, and not something either theoretically >>>>possible nor probable? right?


    Only if you look at mainstream media, mainstream science and
    governments and nothing else.


    What is "non-mainstream" science?

    Creation science?


    No


    Christian science?


    Same thing.


    Metaphysical science?


    You are clueless. It's any science that's not suppressed by
    governments and certain celebrity scientists.



    "Science is being suppressed!"

    "Really? What science?"

    "I can't show you because it is being suppressed!"

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Malte Runz@21:1/5 to All on Sun May 18 10:56:25 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    On Sun, 18 May 2025 09:34:13 +1000, "Andrew W" <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    "Bobbie Sellers" wrote in message news:100ah56$fsq2$[email protected]...



    On 5/16/25 19:19, Andrew W wrote:
    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in
    news:1008hi7$fig$[email protected]:

    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...

    Malte Runz <[email protected]> wrote in
    news:[email protected]:

    On Fri, 16 May 2025 12:16:47 +1000, "Andrew W" <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote:

    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in
    news:1005t7r$3cnf6$[email protected]:

    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...


    Has that happened since the discovery
    of hundreds of exoplanets?


    Discovery of exoplanets is only the first step. They're still not >>>>>>>> telling the people the important details like the earth's true >>>>>>>> history and who/what else is in this galaxy.

    I take it that you know many of the details. You know Earth's true >>>>>>> history and a lot of other facts about what goes on in this galaxy. >>>>>>>
    But instead of sharing that information, and your sources, with us, >>>>>>> you'll spend post after post coming up with excuses for not doing >>>>>>> it.

    'You're too lazy to do your own research.' 'I can't list all the >>>>>>> information I've spent decades finding.' 'The deep state has
    destroyed the evidence.' 'You only believe MSM.' 'You're mind
    controlled by the elites.' 'Why do you even need evidence?'

    On and on it goes. We been through this many times before, so unless >>>>>>> you have some new material, I'll suggest you go fuck yourself. Cool? >>>>>>


    It is depressing there are so many
    conspiracy-behind-everything kooks like
    him. Their lives re so unremarkable and
    enpty they invent a "special knowledge"
    they think elevates them above everyone
    else.


    But scientists never invent new theories to become prominent and get >>>>> government grants?


    You know that scientific grant requests
    get previewed by other scientists, no?


    And they are more trustworthy and have nothing to gain? It's basically a >>> club.

    A very internally competitive club where the scientists try to find flaws >>in
    data, its acquistion, and the logic usually mathematical to reject the new >>theories. What they have to gain is the sharing of possibly accurate data >>and ideas. Generally until an experiment or data acquistion mode is tested >>in another laboratory it is not considered proven or the theory relating to >>it is considered for acceptance.


    Yes that does happen, but what also happens is the establishments deride and >suppress discoveries that would ruin their narratives. ...

    Let me guess. 'Tesla discovered universal free give-away energy for
    nothing, but the globalist deep state elites are hiding it from us,
    because they want to control the masses!!!'

    Much of the science debates that go on are also to distract the masses and >muddy the waters.

    Conspiracy think 1.01.



    Yes it takes years to gain the skills necessary for scientific and/or >>technological
    research to be done but you would not be sitting whereever you are and >>typ[ng into your computer if poeple did not no devote themselves to such >>studies. I will remind you or inform you if you did not know that when I >>was young computers were mostly human beings who devoted themselves
    to mathematics.

    Computers then became gigantic electrical machines then electronic
    machines which materials reseach managed to reduce to much handier
    sizes. You are using the results of scientific research and many >>theoretical
    changes to communicate so yoiu should consider that seriously when
    you come off with your half-baked ideas about science and scientists.


    The establishments allowed computer tech, television tech etc., basically >entertainment, mainly to occupy people with crap and video games. Busy
    people don't ask questions. Governments hate questions.

    'Mr. President, who pays the tariffs?'

    Maybe you can answer that one? I know who pay them, of course, but I
    would like to hear you say it. I don't think you have the moral
    fortitude, though.



    Every ten years or so they throw out most of their theories and make >>>>> up new ones. But you still trust them that only they have the 'facts'. >>>>>

    Bingo. That is where Nobel prizes come
    from, disproving a previously held theory
    with a new one, backed by evidence.


    Thin evidence that's open to interpretation. But they get their money.
    And Nobel prizes are another motivation and fame generator.



    We
    thought the world was static, then we
    discovered plate techtonics, we thought
    the moon was dead, then we discoved
    moonquakes, we thought gravity was just
    attractive, then we discovered it can
    repel things. Ain't science grand?


    So mainstream scientists used to be really dumb. Now they're less dumb.
    Many ancient people knew more about the stars as depicted in wall art
    than many later scientists.


    The ancients built non-optical observatories to study the
    heavens with the unaided eye.
    But they had no idea of the nature of the Sun or of other stars as far
    as we know. Some figured out the Earth was more spherical than
    flat but no great knowlege of the stars but the knowlege of their >>obsevation. Mostly they did observations to construct astrological
    charts and to make sure of the Quarter-Days i.e. Eqinoxes and
    Solstices. Which is what a lot of ancient monuments were constructed
    to determine.


    You don't know that. There is archaeological evidence that ancient humans >were contacted by advanced ETs ...

    Bullshit. Have you been binge watching "Ancient Aliens" again?



    ... who imparted advanced celestial knowledge,
    including energy generation, healing tech etc.

    Absolute bullshit.

    --
    Malte Runz

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew W@21:1/5 to Mitchell Holman on Sun May 18 21:47:47 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message news:[email protected]...

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in
    news:100b37l$jvfs$[email protected]:

    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in >>>news:1008q7s$1rnm$[email protected]:

    "jojo" wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...

    JTEM wrote:
    On 5/16/25 11:15 AM, jojo wrote:

    sooo... aliens are a theoretical construct??

    It seems implausible that you could fail so miserably at
    discerning the context. I have to assume that you suffer
    from a narcissistic personality disorder, at the very
    least, and are thus compelled to obfuscate.


    And there's a lot of that that goes on in these groups.



    To anyone else: The claim is that aliens are here, present
    in our solar system, not merely existing.


    okay, super. so its a claim, and not something either theoretically >>>>>possible nor probable? right?


    Only if you look at mainstream media, mainstream science and
    governments and nothing else.


    What is "non-mainstream" science?

    Creation science?


    No


    Christian science?


    Same thing.


    Metaphysical science?


    You are clueless. It's any science that's not suppressed by
    governments and certain celebrity scientists.



    "Science is being suppressed!"

    "Really? What science?"

    "I can't show you because it is being suppressed!"


    You've had all your life to see what's happening in this world. You must be some kind of zombie.


    --
    “We own everyone of any significance in the major media.” CIA Director William Colby
    “We’ll know when our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the
    American people believes is false.” CIA Director William Casey

    Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
    the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew W@21:1/5 to Mitchell Holman on Sun May 18 21:50:28 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message news:[email protected]...

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in news:100b5fq$kdrl$[email protected]:

    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in >>>news:10098uc$7vri$[email protected]:




    A lot of facts some scientists declared in the past were not facts in
    the first place. And a lot of present ones will not be in the future.


    You make that sound like a negative.


    It sounds like you're totally entranced by popular science.




    Is there another kind?


    Yes. I'm sure you're old enough to figure it out for yourself.


    --
    “We own everyone of any significance in the major media.” CIA Director William Colby
    “We’ll know when our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the
    American people believes is false.” CIA Director William Casey

    Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
    the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew W@21:1/5 to Mitchell Holman on Sun May 18 21:49:17 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message news:[email protected]...

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in news:100b3e4$k17q$1@dont-
    email.me:

    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in news:1008r6v$5ro1$1@dont- >>>email.me:

    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in news:1008g4q$8q9$1@dont- >>>email.me:

    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>>news:100676l$3i7jt$[email protected]:

    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>>>>news:1005t7r$3cnf6$[email protected]:

    "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...

    "Andrew W" <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>news:1003rh6$2v9s5$[email protected]:



    We didn't find our first exoplanet until the 1990s!


    Um, only according to mainstream scientists who are funded by >>>>>>>>>>>> government grants. They have to keep quiet or they lose their >>>>>>>>>>>> funding and reputations.




    Why would government cover up a scientific
    discovery of an exoplanet?


    Simple. Because then the world would find out the earth's and >>>>>>>>>> humanity's true history, and that would lead to them losing
    power
    and profits.



    Has that happened since the discovery
    of hundreds of exoplanets?


    Discovery of exoplanets is only the first step. They're still not >>>>>>>> telling the people the important details like the earth's true >>>>>history
    and who/what else is in this galaxy.


    OK, it is a slow news day,
    let's explore that first one.

    What is Earth's "true history"
    that "they" are not telling us?


    You will learn that when you're ready, if you live that long.


    I knew you would run away.


    Yes every smart person runs away from dumb jerks.


    "....important details like the earth's
    true history"

    Still waiting.


    Why do you want to know that?


    Another day, another claim that
    Andrew runs away from.


    And how many of my questions have you run away from?
    You're just a propagandist and authority follower.


    --
    “We own everyone of any significance in the major media.” CIA Director William Colby
    “We’ll know when our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the
    American people believes is false.” CIA Director William Casey

    Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
    the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Malte Runz@21:1/5 to All on Sun May 18 20:01:38 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    On Sat, 17 May 2025 21:35:47 +1000, "Andrew W" <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    "Malte Runz" wrote in message >news:[email protected]...
    (snip)

    But you're not ordinary, are you?


    Thinking outside the box and questioning authority, no I guess not.


    Claiming to be 'Thinking outside the box' is your way of saying 'I
    don't need evidence to believe'.


    In history many who publically questioned the narrative were derided and >persecuted. And later they were heralded.

    Because their ideas were eventually properly researched, verified and
    peer reviewed. Your claims about space aliens haven't been through
    that process, and until they have, you and your soul mates will be
    treated as kooks.

    --
    Malte Runz

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mitchell Holman@21:1/5 to Malte Runz on Mon May 19 01:58:22 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    Malte Runz <[email protected]> wrote in news:[email protected]:

    On Sun, 18 May 2025 09:34:13 +1000, "Andrew W" <[email protected]>
    wrote:


    You don't know that. There is archaeological evidence that ancient
    humans were contacted by advanced ETs ...

    Bullshit. Have you been binge watching "Ancient Aliens" again?



    ... who imparted advanced celestial knowledge,
    including energy generation, healing tech etc.

    Absolute bullshit.



    All conspiracies end with a
    "someday we will be prove right"
    narrative that never comes to pass.

    Those of us who grew up in
    the John Birch days remember all
    the conspiracies THEY spun about
    the communists behind civil rights
    marches and Jimmy Hoffa and Motown
    music and mini-skirts and "the pill".
    Every controversy in the news was
    proof of a communist plot.

    And so it is with the "aliens
    visitors" rabble.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew W@21:1/5 to Malte Runz on Mon May 19 12:52:41 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    "Malte Runz" wrote in message news:[email protected]...

    On Sat, 17 May 2025 21:35:47 +1000, "Andrew W" <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    "Malte Runz" wrote in message >>news:[email protected]...
    (snip)

    But you're not ordinary, are you?


    Thinking outside the box and questioning authority, no I guess not.


    Claiming to be 'Thinking outside the box' is your way of saying 'I
    don't need evidence to believe'.


    In history many who publically questioned the narrative were derided and >>persecuted. And later they were heralded.


    I think you follow your emotions and authorities more than actual evidence.



    Because their ideas were eventually properly researched, verified and
    peer reviewed. Your claims about space aliens haven't been through
    that process, and until they have, you and your soul mates will be
    treated as kooks.


    Aliens can't be put through that process. It comes down to people's experiences.


    --
    “We own everyone of any significance in the major media.” CIA Director William Colby
    “We’ll know when our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the
    American people believes is false.” CIA Director William Casey

    Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
    the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Titus G@21:1/5 to Malte Runz on Mon May 19 16:25:46 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    On 18/05/25 20:56, Malte Runz wrote:
    On Sun, 18 May 2025 09:34:13 +1000, "Andrew W" <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    SNIP for BREVITY

    ... who imparted advanced celestial knowledge,
    including energy generation, healing tech etc.

    Absolute bullshit.

    I believe it is possible that those cheap supermarket sticking plasters
    were designed by aliens

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Malte Runz@21:1/5 to All on Mon May 19 12:52:17 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    On Mon, 19 May 2025 12:52:41 +1000, "Andrew W" <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    "Malte Runz" wrote in message >news:[email protected]...

    On Sat, 17 May 2025 21:35:47 +1000, "Andrew W" <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    "Malte Runz" wrote in message >>>news:[email protected]...
    (snip)

    But you're not ordinary, are you?


    Thinking outside the box and questioning authority, no I guess not.


    Claiming to be 'Thinking outside the box' is your way of saying 'I
    don't need evidence to believe'.


    In history many who publically questioned the narrative were derided and >>>persecuted. And later they were heralded.


    I think you follow your emotions and authorities more than actual evidence.

    There is no "actual evidence". According to you, as per last year or
    so, photos and videos can be faked, people can, and do, lie about
    their experiences, and the deep state keeps all the physical evidence
    hidden from the public. What's left?



    Because their ideas were eventually properly researched, verified and
    peer reviewed. Your claims about space aliens haven't been through
    that process, and until they have, you and your soul mates will be
    treated as kooks.


    Aliens can't be put through that process. ...

    How convenient!

    ... It comes down to people's
    experiences.

    It comes down to whether one believes the anecdotal evidence or not.
    You do, I don't.

    --
    Malte Runz

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew W@21:1/5 to Malte Runz on Mon May 19 22:06:04 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    "Malte Runz" wrote in message news:[email protected]...

    On Mon, 19 May 2025 12:52:41 +1000, "Andrew W" <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    "Malte Runz" wrote in message >>news:[email protected]...

    On Sat, 17 May 2025 21:35:47 +1000, "Andrew W" <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    "Malte Runz" wrote in message >>>>news:[email protected]...
    (snip)

    But you're not ordinary, are you?


    Thinking outside the box and questioning authority, no I guess not.


    Claiming to be 'Thinking outside the box' is your way of saying 'I
    don't need evidence to believe'.


    In history many who publically questioned the narrative were derided and >>>>persecuted. And later they were heralded.


    I think you follow your emotions and authorities more than actual
    evidence.

    There is no "actual evidence".


    Yes there is but you've never looked for any. You just listen to the public jerks offs and CIA and believe everything they say.



    According to you, as per last year or
    so, photos and videos can be faked, people can, and do, lie about
    their experiences,


    Yeah and governments and some scientists lie frequently, but that's news for you.



    and the deep state keeps all the physical evidence
    hidden from the public. What's left?


    What's left is your action to find out the truth. There's decades of
    research on these phenomena. But you're not interested, but you still want
    to mouth off and be the smart ass.




    Because their ideas were eventually properly researched, verified and >>>peer reviewed. Your claims about space aliens haven't been through
    that process, and until they have, you and your soul mates will be >>>treated as kooks.


    Aliens can't be put through that process. ...

    How convenient!


    And convenience is all you look for.



    ... It comes down to people's
    experiences.

    It comes down to whether one believes the anecdotal evidence or not.
    You do, I don't.


    It's not just about 'anecdotal evidence' and nothing else. There's a lot
    more to it, but you never do any research to determine what happened in the hundreds of cases.


    --
    “We own everyone of any significance in the major media.” CIA Director William Colby
    “We’ll know when our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the
    American people believes is false.” CIA Director William Casey

    Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
    the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott Dorsey@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Mon May 19 15:51:00 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    In article <100ebs2$1eijm$[email protected]>, Titus G <[email protected]> wrote: >On 18/05/25 20:56, Malte Runz wrote:
    On Sun, 18 May 2025 09:34:13 +1000, "Andrew W" <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    SNIP for BREVITY

    ... who imparted advanced celestial knowledge,
    including energy generation, healing tech etc.

    Absolute bullshit.

    I believe it is possible that those cheap supermarket sticking plasters
    were designed by aliens

    Are you implying that they would fit perfectly on my sixth finger or weiox? --scott
    --
    "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Malte Runz@21:1/5 to All on Mon May 19 23:21:59 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    On Mon, 19 May 2025 22:06:04 +1000, "Andrew W" <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    "Malte Runz" wrote in message >news:[email protected]...

    On Mon, 19 May 2025 12:52:41 +1000, "Andrew W" <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    "Malte Runz" wrote in message >>>news:[email protected]...

    On Sat, 17 May 2025 21:35:47 +1000, "Andrew W" <[email protected]> >>>>wrote:

    "Malte Runz" wrote in message >>>>>news:[email protected]...
    (snip)

    But you're not ordinary, are you?


    Thinking outside the box and questioning authority, no I guess not.


    Claiming to be 'Thinking outside the box' is your way of saying 'I >>>>don't need evidence to believe'.


    In history many who publically questioned the narrative were derided and >>>>>persecuted. And later they were heralded.


    I think you follow your emotions and authorities more than actual >>>evidence.

    There is no "actual evidence".

    Here is what I predicted four posts earlier:

    "I take it that you know many of the details. You know Earth's true
    history and a lot of other facts about what goes on in this galaxy.

    But instead of sharing that information, and your sources, with us,
    you'll spend post after post coming up with excuses for not doing it.

    'You're too lazy to do your own research.' 'I can't list all the
    information I've spent decades finding.' 'The deep state has destroyed
    the evidence.' 'You only believe MSM.' 'You're mind controlled by the
    elites.' 'Why do you even need evidence?'

    And what did I get from You?

    Yes there is but you've never looked for any. ...

    "'You're too lazy to do your own research.' "


    ... You just listen to the public
    jerks offs and CIA and believe everything they say.

    "You only believe MSM.'"


    According to you, as per last year or
    so, photos and videos can be faked, people can, and do, lie about
    their experiences,


    Yeah and governments and some scientists lie frequently, but that's news for >you.

    "'The deep state has destroyed the evidence.' "


    and the deep state keeps all the physical evidence
    hidden from the public. What's left?


    What's left is your action to find out the truth. There's decades of
    research on these phenomena. ...

    "'I can't list all the information I've spent decades finding.'"

    ... you're not interested, but you still want
    to mouth off and be the smart ass.

    "'Why do you even need evidence?'"

    I also wrote this in the same post:

    "On and on it goes. We been through this many times before, so unless
    you have some new material, I'll suggest you go fuck yourself. Cool?"

    --
    Malte Runz

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew W@21:1/5 to Malte Runz on Tue May 20 09:59:28 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    "Malte Runz" wrote in message news:[email protected]...

    On Mon, 19 May 2025 22:06:04 +1000, "Andrew W" <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    "Malte Runz" wrote in message >>news:[email protected]...

    On Mon, 19 May 2025 12:52:41 +1000, "Andrew W" <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    "Malte Runz" wrote in message >>>>news:[email protected]...

    On Sat, 17 May 2025 21:35:47 +1000, "Andrew W" <[email protected]> >>>>>wrote:

    "Malte Runz" wrote in message >>>>>>news:[email protected]...
    (snip)

    But you're not ordinary, are you?


    Thinking outside the box and questioning authority, no I guess not.


    Claiming to be 'Thinking outside the box' is your way of saying 'I >>>>>don't need evidence to believe'.


    In history many who publically questioned the narrative were derided >>>>>>and
    persecuted. And later they were heralded.


    I think you follow your emotions and authorities more than actual >>>>evidence.

    There is no "actual evidence".

    Here is what I predicted four posts earlier:

    "I take it that you know many of the details. You know Earth's true
    history and a lot of other facts about what goes on in this galaxy.

    But instead of sharing that information, and your sources, with us,
    you'll spend post after post coming up with excuses for not doing it.


    There's no point in sharing info with ignorant and lazy trolls. When will
    you get this?



    'You're too lazy to do your own research.' 'I can't list all the
    information I've spent decades finding.' 'The deep state has destroyed
    the evidence.' 'You only believe MSM.' 'You're mind controlled by the >elites.' 'Why do you even need evidence?'

    And what did I get from You?


    What do I ever get from you?



    Yes there is but you've never looked for any. ...

    "'You're too lazy to do your own research.' "


    You're parroting your own problem. Is that an attempt to cover it up?



    ... You just listen to the public
    jerks offs and CIA and believe everything they say.

    "You only believe MSM.'"


    Parroting the truth does not help you. It doesn't make you look smarter. Did you think it did?



    According to you, as per last year or
    so, photos and videos can be faked, people can, and do, lie about
    their experiences,


    Yeah and governments and some scientists lie frequently, but that's news >>for
    you.

    "'The deep state has destroyed the evidence.' "


    Correct. Can you address any of these points?



    and the deep state keeps all the physical evidence
    hidden from the public. What's left?


    What's left is your action to find out the truth. There's decades of >>research on these phenomena. ...

    "'I can't list all the information I've spent decades finding.'"


    List your proofs for your sources.



    ... you're not interested, but you still want
    to mouth off and be the smart ass.

    "'Why do you even need evidence?'"

    I also wrote this in the same post:

    "On and on it goes. We been through this many times before, so unless
    you have some new material, I'll suggest you go fuck yourself. Cool?"


    News for you - mud slinging cannot win debates.
    Fact: You have nothing to offer but smart ass troll remarks and crap.


    --
    “We own everyone of any significance in the major media.” CIA Director William Colby
    “We’ll know when our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the
    American people believes is false.” CIA Director William Casey

    Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
    the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Malte Runz@21:1/5 to All on Tue May 20 09:22:38 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    On Tue, 20 May 2025 09:59:28 +1000, "Andrew W" <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    "Malte Runz" wrote in message >news:[email protected]...

    (snip)

    "On and on it goes. We been through this many times before, so unless
    you have some new material, I'll suggest you go fuck yourself. Cool?"

    --
    Malte Runz

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew W@21:1/5 to JTEM on Wed May 21 08:21:37 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    "JTEM" wrote in message news:100g8p0$1qrhd$[email protected]...

    On 5/19/25 6:52 AM, Malte Runz wrote:

    There is no "actual evidence". According to you, as per last year or
    so, photos and videos can be faked, people can, and do, lie about
    their experiences, and the deep state keeps all the physical evidence
    hidden from the public. What's left?

    Is there evidence?

    What kind of evidence?
    Why hide it?

    So the gov and military can retrieve and back engineer the advanced tech for war weapons.



    Who would have access to it?


    Military generals and CIA.



    Knowledge?

    NOT looking for definitive answers but starting points.


    So the truth comes out. You're actually clueless.


    --
    “We own everyone of any significance in the major media.” CIA Director William Colby
    “We’ll know when our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the
    American people believes is false.” CIA Director William Casey

    Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
    the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew W@21:1/5 to JTEM on Wed May 21 15:51:37 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    "JTEM" wrote in message news:100jgc3$2lbgp$[email protected]...

    On 5/20/25 6:21 PM, Andrew W wrote:

    So the gov and military can retrieve and back engineer the advanced tech
    for war weapons.

    This would be inconsistent with the fact that they originated
    the narrative.

    Even all your terms -- UFO and UAP, for example -- you got from
    the government!

    Project Bluebook was not repeat NOT an effort by an assortment
    of Avon Ladies. No, it was the government...


    Cuckoo


    --
    “We own everyone of any significance in the major media.” CIA Director William Colby
    “We’ll know when our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the
    American people believes is false.” CIA Director William Casey

    Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
    the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew W@21:1/5 to JTEM on Sun May 25 10:50:05 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    "JTEM" wrote in message news:100juas$2ne1f$[email protected]...

    Andrew W wrote:

    "JTEM" wrote in message news:100jgc3$2lbgp$[email protected]...

    On 5/20/25 6:21 PM, Andrew W wrote:
    So the gov and military can retrieve and back engineer the advanced
    tech for war weapons.

    This would be inconsistent with the fact that they originated
    the narrative.

    Even all your terms -- UFO and UAP, for example -- you got from
    the government!

    Project Bluebook was not repeat NOT an effort by an assortment
    of Avon Ladies. No, it was the government...

    Cuckoo

    Yes. Yes you are. If you're claiming that anything quoted above
    is the least bit inaccurate, you're full-on nuts.


    You're wrong. UFO encounter data came from experiencers and researchers. Governments are only compelled to tell the people certain things after the fact. That's what governments do.
    Governments making up stuff about earth being visited by ETs is ultimately pointless. It only prompts questions from the masses which the government doesn't want.


    --
    “We own everyone of any significance in the major media.” CIA Director William Colby
    “We’ll know when our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the
    American people believes is false.” CIA Director William Casey

    Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
    the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew W@21:1/5 to JTEM on Sun May 25 11:06:02 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    "JTEM" wrote in message news:100juas$2ne1f$[email protected]...

    Andrew W wrote:

    "JTEM" wrote in message news:100jgc3$2lbgp$[email protected]...

    On 5/20/25 6:21 PM, Andrew W wrote:
    So the gov and military can retrieve and back engineer the advanced
    tech for war weapons.

    This would be inconsistent with the fact that they originated
    the narrative.

    Even all your terms -- UFO and UAP, for example -- you got from
    the government!

    Project Bluebook was not repeat NOT an effort by an assortment
    of Avon Ladies. No, it was the government...

    Cuckoo

    Yes. Yes you are. If you're claiming that anything quoted above
    is the least bit inaccurate, you're full-on nuts.


    So anyone who doesn't agree with the accuracy of your theories is nuts.


    --
    “We own everyone of any significance in the major media.” CIA Director William Colby
    “We’ll know when our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the
    American people believes is false.” CIA Director William Casey

    Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
    the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Dalton@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jun 25 21:19:59 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    On May 13, 2025, David Dalton wrote
    (in article<[email protected]>):

    As I state on the "Waning Clamshell/another reset to pre-judging”
    thread on alt.religion.druid, there are now 283 DNA-based aliens
    in my region, which is basically the Earth Moon system but not
    including deep inside the Earth and the Moon (see that thread
    for an exact description).

    If you happen to know one of the 283, please relay this to them.
    I am also hoping they are scanning the Internet for the number 283.

    As I have posted before, there will be a sudden evolution of
    viruses and DNA-based species in my region.

    The aliens are in four species: a two-spirit one, a four-spirit one,
    a gilled (plus air-breathing) one, and a photosynthesizing one.

    Homo sapiens will split into 60 species, five of which will
    get about an extra 200 years lifespan and 55 of which
    will get an extra 100 years. Those five will be Beothuk
    species (which will be my species after evolution),
    Hain, Vico, Gilled, and Photo, which the aliens, along
    with of course many former homo sapiens, will go into.

    I now think there are 468 aliens in the Earth Moon system,
    not 283.

    --
    https://www.nfld.com/~dalton/dtales.html Salmon on the Thorns (mystic page) “Early morning jubilators, up to no good instigators... Sons of long forgotten races, that the darkest night embraces” (Ron Hynes & D.O'D)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Malte Runz@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jun 26 10:41:43 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 21:19:59 -0230, David Dalton <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    On May 13, 2025, David Dalton wrote
    (in article<[email protected]>):

    As I state on the "Waning Clamshell/another reset to pre-judging�
    thread on alt.religion.druid, there are now 283 DNA-based aliens
    in my region, which is basically the Earth Moon system but not
    including deep inside the Earth and the Moon (see that thread
    for an exact description).

    If you happen to know one of the 283, please relay this to them.
    I am also hoping they are scanning the Internet for the number 283.

    As I have posted before, there will be a sudden evolution of
    viruses and DNA-based species in my region.

    The aliens are in four species: a two-spirit one, a four-spirit one,
    a gilled (plus air-breathing) one, and a photosynthesizing one.

    Homo sapiens will split into 60 species, five of which will
    get about an extra 200 years lifespan and 55 of which
    will get an extra 100 years. Those five will be Beothuk
    species (which will be my species after evolution),
    Hain, Vico, Gilled, and Photo, which the aliens, along
    with of course many former homo sapiens, will go into.

    I now think there are 468 aliens in the Earth Moon system,
    not 283.

    What new information has surfaced that made you adjust your
    assessment?

    --
    Malte Runz

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Dalton@21:1/5 to Malte Runz on Thu Jun 26 16:16:03 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    On Jun 26, 2025, Malte Runz wrote
    (in article<[email protected]>):

    On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 21:19:59 -0230, David Dalton<[email protected]>
    wrote:

    On May 13, 2025, David Dalton wrote
    (in article<[email protected]>)
    :

    As I state on the "Waning Clamshell/another reset to pre-judging” thread on alt.religion.druid, there are now 283 DNA-based aliens
    in my region, which is basically the Earth Moon system but not
    including deep inside the Earth and the Moon (see that thread
    for an exact description).

    If you happen to know one of the 283, please relay this to them.
    I am also hoping they are scanning the Internet for the number 283.

    As I have posted before, there will be a sudden evolution of
    viruses and DNA-based species in my region.

    The aliens are in four species: a two-spirit one, a four-spirit one,
    a gilled (plus air-breathing) one, and a photosynthesizing one.

    Homo sapiens will split into 60 species, five of which will
    get about an extra 200 years lifespan and 55 of which
    will get an extra 100 years. Those five will be Beothuk
    species (which will be my species after evolution),
    Hain, Vico, Gilled, and Photo, which the aliens, along
    with of course many former homo sapiens, will go into.

    I now think there are 468 aliens in the Earth Moon system,
    not 283.

    What new information has surfaced that made you adjust your
    assessment?

    It came about after a new (or perhaps first time) judging of my
    negotiated workings by Goddess, who I define as the ruler
    of the region all/everything and who many call God. I determined
    the new number 468 by perineum click (short period mula bandha)
    divination. However that has been unreliable for me since i
    started doing it 29 years ago, but I hope it was finally correct
    in this case.

    --
    https://www.nfld.com/~dalton/dtales.html Salmon on the Thorns (mystic page) “Early morning jubilators, up to no good instigators... Sons of long forgotten races, that the darkest night embraces” (Ron Hynes & D.O'D)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Dalton@21:1/5 to JTEM on Thu Jun 26 16:13:00 2025
    XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.science, rec.arts.sf.written

    On Jun 26, 2025, JTEM wrote
    (in article <103iddl$38200$[email protected]>):

    On 6/25/25 7:49 PM, David Dalton wrote:

    I now think there are 468 aliens in the Earth Moon system,
    not 283.

    What do they eat? Which has the strangest diet? Where do they
    get their food from, presumably stationed so far away from
    their home planets and with finite storage?

    Do they all breath oxygen? What if any other gases do they breath?

    Any from a water world?

    Are there any for whom oxygen is poisonous?

    Do any practice cannibalism?

    Do any crew members ever die, how do they handle that?

    Do any NOT practice sexual reproduction? Are they reproducing in
    our solar system or only before/after missions?

    Do any communicate with colors or odors?

    How do they handle bodily waste?

    Do they require entertainment and, if so, what is their
    entertainment?

    Do they have any religions?

    Do they have art? Music?

    What most repulses them about humans?

    What do they admire most/find most attractive about humans?

    What is their greatest fear regarding humans?

    What is their greatest hope for humans?

    Did any of them choose to go on a mission to our solar system?

    Did any of them prefer NOT to come here but were compelled?

    I can’t answer most of those questions. But they are refugees
    and the last of their (four species). One of the species is
    gilled and also air (oxygen) breathing. One of the species
    is photosynthesizing and also oxygen breathing, so breaths
    oxygen and may absorb carbon dioxide through the skin.
    Again the other two species are a two-spirit transitioning
    species and a four-spirit transitioning species, as I have
    discussed before.

    --
    https://www.nfld.com/~dalton/dtales.html Salmon on the Thorns (mystic page) “Early morning jubilators, up to no good instigators... Sons of long forgotten races, that the darkest night embraces” (Ron Hynes & D.O'D)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)