• Re: Weather history accuracy

    From It's A Me@21:1/5 to Crash on Fri May 9 13:10:34 2025
    On 2025-05-09 01:04:12 +0000, Crash said:

    It seems that NIWA/Met Service have been caught out:

    https://centrist.nz/ian-wishart-science-minister-reti-niwa-needs-an-intervention/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=newsletter&utm_campaign=9-5-2025&_kx=uBMjkMr2C8pjfBkYE2tMrZxpVu7AAzZhqncqpA4naio.VYfxNg


    I've never seen *ANY* weather forecast that is ever actually accurate.
    It's a near-useless waste of tax-payer and business money.

    Supposedly Auckland was meant to have "heavy rain" and "thunderstorms"
    today ... so far nothing but drizzle, and even that has stopped from
    time to time. Of course, given Auckland's topography, the weather can
    be completely different in neighbouring areas. I've driven along one
    long-ish road and had sun at one end and rain at the other. I've also
    been walking the dog along one road and seen rain on the next parallel
    road.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Crash@21:1/5 to All on Fri May 9 13:04:12 2025
    It seems that NIWA/Met Service have been caught out:

    https://centrist.nz/ian-wishart-science-minister-reti-niwa-needs-an-intervention/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=newsletter&utm_campaign=9-5-2025&_kx=uBMjkMr2C8pjfBkYE2tMrZxpVu7AAzZhqncqpA4naio.VYfxNg


    --
    Crash McBash

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Crash@21:1/5 to All on Fri May 9 13:39:16 2025
    On Fri, 9 May 2025 13:10:34 +1200, It's A Me <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    On 2025-05-09 01:04:12 +0000, Crash said:

    It seems that NIWA/Met Service have been caught out:

    https://centrist.nz/ian-wishart-science-minister-reti-niwa-needs-an-intervention/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=newsletter&utm_campaign=9-5-2025&_kx=uBMjkMr2C8pjfBkYE2tMrZxpVu7AAzZhqncqpA4naio.VYfxNg


    I've never seen *ANY* weather forecast that is ever actually accurate.
    It's a near-useless waste of tax-payer and business money.

    Supposedly Auckland was meant to have "heavy rain" and "thunderstorms"
    today ... so far nothing but drizzle, and even that has stopped from
    time to time. Of course, given Auckland's topography, the weather can
    be completely different in neighbouring areas. I've driven along one
    long-ish road and had sun at one end and rain at the other. I've also
    been walking the dog along one road and seen rain on the next parallel
    road.

    That was not the point of the article - it was about inaccurate
    historical whether record claims being used to justify evidence of
    climate change.

    So the weather where you are is better than forecast. That is OK -
    but better than a weather-bomb never forecast. These days, weather
    forecasting is about comparing recent readings from various locations
    and forecasting what will happen based on records for the same
    locations going back 40 years or more - all on a computer. This
    should be reasonably accurate but nothing can ever be 100% correct
    over even 12 hours.


    --
    Crash McBash

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Crash on Fri May 9 02:16:42 2025
    Crash <[email protected]d> wrote:
    On Fri, 9 May 2025 13:10:34 +1200, It's A Me <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    On 2025-05-09 01:04:12 +0000, Crash said:

    It seems that NIWA/Met Service have been caught out:

    https://centrist.nz/ian-wishart-science-minister-reti-niwa-needs-an-intervention/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=newsletter&utm_campaign=9-5-2025&_kx=uBMjkMr2C8pjfBkYE2tMrZxpVu7AAzZhqncqpA4naio.VYfxNg


    I've never seen *ANY* weather forecast that is ever actually accurate.
    It's a near-useless waste of tax-payer and business money.

    Supposedly Auckland was meant to have "heavy rain" and "thunderstorms" >>today ... so far nothing but drizzle, and even that has stopped from
    time to time. Of course, given Auckland's topography, the weather can
    be completely different in neighbouring areas. I've driven along one >>long-ish road and had sun at one end and rain at the other. I've also
    been walking the dog along one road and seen rain on the next parallel >>road.

    That was not the point of the article - it was about inaccurate
    historical whether record claims being used to justify evidence of
    climate change.

    So the weather where you are is better than forecast. That is OK -
    but better than a weather-bomb never forecast. These days, weather >forecasting is about comparing recent readings from various locations
    and forecasting what will happen based on records for the same
    locations going back 40 years or more - all on a computer. This
    should be reasonably accurate but nothing can ever be 100% correct
    over even 12 hours.

    The article mirrors complaints from Europe and in particular the UK where temperatures are often reported as being record highs when in fact they are nothing of the sort.
    A cynic might wonder who profits form such misinformation.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From It's A Me@21:1/5 to Crash on Fri May 9 18:10:04 2025
    On 2025-05-09 01:39:16 +0000, Crash said:

    On Fri, 9 May 2025 13:10:34 +1200, It's A Me <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    On 2025-05-09 01:04:12 +0000, Crash said:

    It seems that NIWA/Met Service have been caught out:

    https://centrist.nz/ian-wishart-science-minister-reti-niwa-needs-an-intervention/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=newsletter&utm_campaign=9-5-2025&_kx=uBMjkMr2C8pjfBkYE2tMrZxpVu7AAzZhqncqpA4naio.VYfxNg



    I've never seen *ANY* weather forecast that is ever actually accurate.
    It's a near-useless waste of tax-payer and business money.

    Supposedly Auckland was meant to have "heavy rain" and "thunderstorms"
    today ... so far nothing but drizzle, and even that has stopped from
    time to time. Of course, given Auckland's topography, the weather can
    be completely different in neighbouring areas. I've driven along one
    long-ish road and had sun at one end and rain at the other. I've also
    been walking the dog along one road and seen rain on the next parallel
    road.

    That was not the point of the article - it was about inaccurate
    historical whether record claims being used to justify evidence of
    climate change.

    So the weather where you are is better than forecast. That is OK -
    but better than a weather-bomb never forecast. These days, weather forecasting is about comparing recent readings from various locations
    and forecasting what will happen based on records for the same
    locations going back 40 years or more - all on a computer. This
    should be reasonably accurate but nothing can ever be 100% correct
    over even 12 hours.

    Nothing is ever accurate, especially when it relies on human beings
    doing the data entry.

    Sky TV's on-screen guide is full of issues (the UKTV program Casualty
    has had the same blurb for every weekly episode since Christmas, and
    it's a blurb from about two season before).

    My own NHI health database information has an address that is about 30
    years out of date and has a mixed up date of birth. (Nobody can change
    it because I'm not registered with a GP.)

    On top of that, weather/climate is only recorded in certain places
    where they have place the measuring devices. As I posted above, it can
    be raining on one road, but not another, so depending on which road the
    rain measuring device is on will affect the record. Similarly with the temperature, wind, etc. measuring devices.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From LOL@21:1/5 to It's A Me on Fri May 9 22:54:14 2025
    On 2025-05-09 13:10:34 +1200, It's A Me wrote:

    I've never seen *ANY* weather forecast that is ever actually accurate.
    It's a near-useless waste of tax-payer and business money.

    Supposedly Auckland was meant to have "heavy rain" and "thunderstorms"
    today ... so far nothing but drizzle, and even that has stopped from
    time to time.

    Auckland got heavy downpours today. A number of flights were delayed or cancelled.

    Link: https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/live-weather-thunderstorms-heavy-downpours-tipped-for-auckland-and-north-island-during-rush-hour-commute/7EI3CGOGHZCM3FSN764BWR2X7E/

    A real example of a useless forecast would be It's A Me trying to
    forecast the rest of today's Auckland weather at 13:10.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From It's A Me@21:1/5 to LOL on Sat May 10 10:37:55 2025
    On 2025-05-09 10:54:14 +0000, LOL said:
    On 2025-05-09 13:10:34 +1200, It's A Me wrote:

    I've never seen *ANY* weather forecast that is ever actually accurate.
    It's a near-useless waste of tax-payer and business money.

    Supposedly Auckland was meant to have "heavy rain" and "thunderstorms"
    today ... so far nothing but drizzle, and even that has stopped from
    time to time.

    Auckland got heavy downpours today. A number of flights were delayed or cancelled.

    Link: https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/live-weather-thunderstorms-heavy-downpours-tipped-for-auckland-and-north-island-during-rush-hour-commute/7EI3CGOGHZCM3FSN764BWR2X7E/


    Some parts of Auckland got heavy rain, others didn't.

    "Auckland" covers a vast area and a lot of topology means one area can
    have different weather to a neighbouring area. Because of that, any
    weather forecast for "Auckland" will always be virtually useless.



    A real example of a useless forecast would be It's A Me trying to
    forecast the rest of today's Auckland weather at 13:10.

    I wasn't giving a forecast at all - I specifically said "so far". We
    eventually did get heavy rain at around 5:30pm (enough to cause a brief
    hiccup in the Sky TV signal), but it only lasted about 10 minutes.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Crash@21:1/5 to LOL on Sat May 10 10:35:07 2025
    On Fri, 9 May 2025 22:54:14 +1200, LOL <[email protected]d> wrote:

    On 2025-05-09 13:10:34 +1200, It's A Me wrote:

    I've never seen *ANY* weather forecast that is ever actually accurate.
    It's a near-useless waste of tax-payer and business money.

    Supposedly Auckland was meant to have "heavy rain" and "thunderstorms"
    today ... so far nothing but drizzle, and even that has stopped from
    time to time.

    Auckland got heavy downpours today. A number of flights were delayed or >cancelled.

    Link: https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/live-weather-thunderstorms-heavy-downpours-tipped-for-auckland-and-north-island-during-rush-hour-commute/7EI3CGOGHZCM3FSN764BWR2X7E/

    A real example of a useless forecast would be It's A Me trying to
    forecast the rest of today's Auckland weather at 13:10.

    This is not a thread about forecasting. It is a thread about
    accurately reporting the historical reporting of a previous days
    weather stats as 'the worst since records began' when it is not.


    --
    Crash McBash

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From LOL@21:1/5 to Crash on Sat May 10 21:53:25 2025
    On 2025-05-10 10:35:07 +1200, Crash wrote:

    This is not a thread about forecasting. It is a thread about
    accurately reporting the historical reporting of a previous days
    weather stats as 'the worst since records began' when it is not.

    Crash McBash
    Thread drift has always been part of Usenet. I have not misunderstood
    your original post. My reply was to It's A Me. To control what is
    posted, use a social media platform which operates that way.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)