https://norightturn.blogspot.com/2025/04/the-return-of-dirty-politics.html
Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote: >>https://norightturn.blogspot.com/2025/04/the-return-of-dirty-politics.html >Desperate nonsense. But your favourite blog is usually so.
On Mon, 7 Apr 2025 07:13:48 -0000 (UTC), TonyWSell done, in that case why do you post the stuff from NRT.
<[email protected]> wrote:
Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote: >>>https://norightturn.blogspot.com/2025/04/the-return-of-dirty-politics.html >>Desperate nonsense. But your favourite blog is usually so.
I agree that the dirty politics is desperate Tony
, but I doubt youPolitical rhetoric at its worst, can't you try harder?
will ever find desperation in the No Right Turn posts. The project
does appear too sophisticated for the Sensible Sentencing people, but
they are just a puppet that have probably been persuaded to allow
their name to be put to it. It is the sort of thing that the Taxpayers
Union have the expertise to do, and was probably timed to try to
affect results in the Taxpayer Union / Curia poll. They will probably
have indemnified the SST people against any fines, but it does seem
that these ads, in association with their other recent hit job on
Golriz Ghahraman may have had the result they were looking for. There
was no hope of increasing support for Luxon, but hitting the Greens is
their preferred target at present.
Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote:It is a contrast - honesty and good analysis compared with the vile
On Mon, 7 Apr 2025 07:13:48 -0000 (UTC), TonyWSell done, in that case why do you post the stuff from NRT.
<[email protected]> wrote:
Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>https://norightturn.blogspot.com/2025/04/the-return-of-dirty-politics.html >>>Desperate nonsense. But your favourite blog is usually so.
I agree that the dirty politics is desperate Tony
That, and you makes no sense.So you couldn't find anything incorrect in my post - you do not have
, but I doubt youPolitical rhetoric at its worst, can't you try harder?
will ever find desperation in the No Right Turn posts. The project
does appear too sophisticated for the Sensible Sentencing people, but
they are just a puppet that have probably been persuaded to allow
their name to be put to it. It is the sort of thing that the Taxpayers >>Union have the expertise to do, and was probably timed to try to
affect results in the Taxpayer Union / Curia poll. They will probably
have indemnified the SST people against any fines, but it does seem
that these ads, in association with their other recent hit job on
Golriz Ghahraman may have had the result they were looking for. There
was no hope of increasing support for Luxon, but hitting the Greens is >>their preferred target at present.
On Mon, 7 Apr 2025 19:51:07 -0000 (UTC), TonyThere is nothing here about the atlas network and NRT is so biased that it is incapable of honesty, juts like you.
<[email protected]> wrote:
Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote:It is a contrast - honesty and good analysis compared with the vile >propaganda from the Atlas Network
On Mon, 7 Apr 2025 07:13:48 -0000 (UTC), TonyWSell done, in that case why do you post the stuff from NRT.
<[email protected]> wrote:
Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>https://norightturn.blogspot.com/2025/04/the-return-of-dirty-politics.html >>>>Desperate nonsense. But your favourite blog is usually so.
I agree that the dirty politics is desperate Tony
Your post is polticial rhetoric as I wrote, have you become disappointed with your English teacher yet, you should be.That, and you makes no sense.So you couldn't find anything incorrect in my post - you do not have
, but I doubt youPolitical rhetoric at its worst, can't you try harder?
will ever find desperation in the No Right Turn posts. The project
does appear too sophisticated for the Sensible Sentencing people, but >>>they are just a puppet that have probably been persuaded to allow
their name to be put to it. It is the sort of thing that the Taxpayers >>>Union have the expertise to do, and was probably timed to try to
affect results in the Taxpayer Union / Curia poll. They will probably >>>have indemnified the SST people against any fines, but it does seem
that these ads, in association with their other recent hit job on
Golriz Ghahraman may have had the result they were looking for. There
was no hope of increasing support for Luxon, but hitting the Greens is >>>their preferred target at present.
to like the truth, Tony - are you not used to being disappointed with >SeymourPetersLuxon yet?
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 715 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 149:05:51 |
| Calls: | 12,091 |
| Calls today: | 4 |
| Files: | 15,000 |
| Messages: | 6,517,565 |