https://centrist.nz/real-estate-agent-loses-legal-battle-over-mandatory-maori-tikanga-course/?utm_source=Klaviyo&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=5-2-2025&_kx=r-9yRwOooklJ4fu8JfYI0L2yjNQJoEDhB4PntHsLeWo.VYfxNg
The REA should not have that right, it should be unlawful for them to be able >to do this. Maybe the new law will fix it, let's hope.
On Tue, 4 Feb 2025 19:53:13 -0000 (UTC), TonyDo you need reading glasses? Read the article and the several associated ones that are available to those that "will" see.
<[email protected]> wrote:
https://centrist.nz/real-estate-agent-loses-legal-battle-over-mandatory-maori-tikanga-course/?utm_source=Klaviyo&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=5-2-2025&_kx=r-9yRwOooklJ4fu8JfYI0L2yjNQJoEDhB4PntHsLeWo.VYfxNg
The REA should not have that right, it should be unlawful for them to be able >>to do this. Maybe the new law will fix it, let's hope.
Why do you think it should be unlawful, Tony?
Surely the rights of a group to set conditions on membership of their
group is up to them, provided it is within the law, and nobody has
suggested that the requirement is against the law. You seem to have
the idea that any opinion of Christopher Luxon should be regarded as
law - while that may be a view held by Trump I doubt that Luxon thinks
it applies to him. So much for your supporting the idea of "Freedom" -
to you Freedom appears to mean supporting anything Luxon says . . .
that is not a law of New Zealand, Tony, and I suspect never will be. >Certainly it is not what most people see as "Freedom"!
On Tue, 4 Feb 2025 19:53:13 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<[email protected]> wrote:
https://centrist.nz/real-estate-agent-loses-legal-battle-over-mandatory-maori-tikanga-course/?utm_source=Klaviyo&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=5-2-2025&_kx=r-9yRwOooklJ4fu8JfYI0L2yjNQJoEDhB4PntHsLeWo.VYfxNg
The REA should not have that right, it should be unlawful for them to be able >>to do this. Maybe the new law will fix it, let's hope.
Why do you think it should be unlawful, Tony?
Surely the rights of a group to set conditions on membership of their
group is up to them, provided it is within the law, and nobody has
suggested that the requirement is against the law. You seem to have
the idea that any opinion of Christopher Luxon should be regarded as
law - while that may be a view held by Trump I doubt that Luxon thinks
it applies to him. So much for your supporting the idea of "Freedom" -
to you Freedom appears to mean supporting anything Luxon says . . .
that is not a law of New Zealand, Tony, and I suspect never will be. >Certainly it is not what most people see as "Freedom"!
Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote:
On Tue, 4 Feb 2025 19:53:13 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<[email protected]> wrote:
The REA should not have that right, it should be unlawful for them to be ablehttps://centrist.nz/real-estate-agent-loses-legal-battle-over-mandatory-maori-tikanga-course/?utm_source=Klaviyo&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=5-2-2025&_kx=r-9yRwOooklJ4fu8JfYI0L2yjNQJoEDhB4PntHsLeWo.VYfxNg
to do this. Maybe the new law will fix it, let's hope.
Why do you think it should be unlawful, Tony?
Do you need reading glasses? Read the article and the several associated ones >that are available to those that "will" see.
Surely the rights of a group to set conditions on membership of their
group is up to them, provided it is within the law, and nobody has >>suggested that the requirement is against the law. You seem to have
the idea that any opinion of Christopher Luxon should be regarded as
law - while that may be a view held by Trump I doubt that Luxon thinks
it applies to him. So much for your supporting the idea of "Freedom" -
to you Freedom appears to mean supporting anything Luxon says . . .
that is not a law of New Zealand, Tony, and I suspect never will be. >>Certainly it is not what most people see as "Freedom"!
On Tue, 4 Feb 2025 19:53:13 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<[email protected]> wrote:
https://centrist.nz/real-estate-agent-loses-legal-battle-over-mandatory-maori-tikanga-course/?utm_source=Klaviyo&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=5-2-2025&_kx=r-9yRwOooklJ4fu8JfYI0L2yjNQJoEDhB4PntHsLeWo.VYfxNg
The REA should not have that right, it should be unlawful for them to be able >>to do this. Maybe the new law will fix it, let's hope.
Why do you think it should be unlawful, Tony?
Surely the rights of a group to set conditions on membership of their
group is up to them, provided it is within the law, and nobody has
suggested that the requirement is against the law.
the idea that any opinion of Christopher Luxon should be regarded as
law - while that may be a view held by Trump I doubt that Luxon thinks
it applies to him. So much for your supporting the idea of "Freedom" -
to you Freedom appears to mean supporting anything Luxon says . . .
that is not a law of New Zealand, Tony, and I suspect never will be. >Certainly it is not what most people see as "Freedom"!
On Wed, 5 Feb 2025 18:54:28 -0000 (UTC), TonyRead the link - it explains everything using mainly common and short words. You should get through it without too much repetitive reading
<[email protected]> wrote:
Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote:
On Tue, 4 Feb 2025 19:53:13 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<[email protected]> wrote:
The REA should not have that right, it should be unlawful for them to be >>>>ablehttps://centrist.nz/real-estate-agent-loses-legal-battle-over-mandatory-maori-tikanga-course/?utm_source=Klaviyo&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=5-2-2025&_kx=r-9yRwOooklJ4fu8JfYI0L2yjNQJoEDhB4PntHsLeWo.VYfxNg
to do this. Maybe the new law will fix it, let's hope.
Why do you think it should be unlawful, Tony?
So you cannot answer my question - just as you have not identified
what represented "A digraceful decision" ABuse gone.
Do you need reading glasses? Read the article and the several associated ones >>that are available to those that "will" see.
Surely the rights of a group to set conditions on membership of their >>>group is up to them, provided it is within the law, and nobody has >>>suggested that the requirement is against the law. You seem to have
the idea that any opinion of Christopher Luxon should be regarded as
law - while that may be a view held by Trump I doubt that Luxon thinks
it applies to him. So much for your supporting the idea of "Freedom" -
to you Freedom appears to mean supporting anything Luxon says . . .
that is not a law of New Zealand, Tony, and I suspect never will be. >>>Certainly it is not what most people see as "Freedom"!
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 715 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 155:53:53 |
| Calls: | 12,092 |
| Files: | 15,000 |
| Messages: | 6,517,723 |