An impressive and respectful gathering - on live stream at RNZ.
Luxon will apparently appear - he needs to apologise for agreeing in a >coalition agreement to give the Bill its first reading; but he also
needs to apologise for agreeing to a long select committee hearing -
that was not in any coalition agreement - and all that time will allow
the Bill to foster dissent and resentment, and waste an enormous
amount of money.
This is an attempt by ACT to create dissent - letting him succeed is
not in anyone's interests other than the devious ACT party who want a >Trump-like manufactured confusion and the distraction of dissent.
Shame on the ACT Party, but shame on National as well. This is
effectively saying that binding agreements are not safe with this
government - sanctity of contract only applies as far as they want it
to . . . a day of great shame to all of the current government.
Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote:
An impressive and respectful gathering - on live stream at RNZ.Why?
Luxon will apparently appear - he needs to apologise for agreeing in a >>coalition agreement to give the Bill its first reading;
but he alsoWhy?
needs to apologise for agreeing to a long select committee hearing -
that was not in any coalition agreement
- and all that time will allowThe dissent and resentment is caused elsewhere.
the Bill to foster dissent and resentment, and waste an enormous
amount of money.
No it is not.
This is an attempt by ACT to create dissent
- letting him succeed isHorseshit.
not in anyone's interests other than the devious ACT party who want a >>Trump-like manufactured confusion and the distraction of dissent.
No, shame on you for being sio disingenuous and playing childish politics. >>This is
Shame on the ACT Party, but shame on National as well.
effectively saying that binding agreements are not safe with this >>governmentNo it is not.
- sanctity of contract only applies as far as they want itThe last government was shameful, your political rhetoric is also shameful >Honesty is foreign to you, but not to most of us.
to . . . a day of great shame to all of the current government.
An impressive and respectful gathering - on live stream at RNZ.Why?
Luxon will apparently appear - he needs to apologise for agreeing in a >coalition agreement to give the Bill its first reading;
but he alsoWhy?
needs to apologise for agreeing to a long select committee hearing -
that was not in any coalition agreement
- and all that time will allowThe dissent and resentment is caused elsewhere.
the Bill to foster dissent and resentment, and waste an enormous
amount of money.
This is an attempt by ACT to create dissentNo it is not.
- letting him succeed isHorseshit.
not in anyone's interests other than the devious ACT party who want a >Trump-like manufactured confusion and the distraction of dissent.
Shame on the ACT Party, but shame on National as well.No, shame on you for being sio disingenuous and playing childish politics. >This is
effectively saying that binding agreements are not safe with thisNo it is not.
government
- sanctity of contract only applies as far as they want itThe last government was shameful, your political rhetoric is also shameful Honesty is foreign to you, but not to most of us.
to . . . a day of great shame to all of the current government.
On Tue, 19 Nov 2024 03:19:52 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<[email protected]> wrote:
Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote:
An impressive and respectful gathering - on live stream at RNZ.Why?
Luxon will apparently appear - he needs to apologise for agreeing in a >>>coalition agreement to give the Bill its first reading;
but he alsoWhy?
needs to apologise for agreeing to a long select committee hearing -
that was not in any coalition agreement
- and all that time will allowThe dissent and resentment is caused elsewhere.
the Bill to foster dissent and resentment, and waste an enormous
amount of money.
No it is not.
This is an attempt by ACT to create dissent
- letting him succeed isNo, shame on you for being sio disingenuous and playing childish politics. >>>This is
not in anyone's interests other than the devious ACT party who want a >>>Trump-like manufactured confusion and the distraction of dissent. >>Horseshit.
Shame on the ACT Party, but shame on National as well.
effectively saying that binding agreements are not safe with this >>>governmentNo it is not.
- sanctity of contract only applies as far as they want itThe last government was shameful, your political rhetoric is also shameful >>Honesty is foreign to you, but not to most of us.
to . . . a day of great shame to all of the current government.
You got it Tony. Rich cannot bring himself to accept that the last
Labour Government vacated the moral high ground with their racist
actions.
On Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:49:42 +1300, Crash <[email protected]d>
wrote:
On Tue, 19 Nov 2024 03:19:52 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<[email protected]> wrote:
Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote:
An impressive and respectful gathering - on live stream at RNZ.Why?
Luxon will apparently appear - he needs to apologise for agreeing in a >>>>coalition agreement to give the Bill its first reading;
but he alsoWhy?
needs to apologise for agreeing to a long select committee hearing - >>>>that was not in any coalition agreement
- and all that time will allowThe dissent and resentment is caused elsewhere.
the Bill to foster dissent and resentment, and waste an enormous
amount of money.
No it is not.
This is an attempt by ACT to create dissent
- letting him succeed isNo, shame on you for being sio disingenuous and playing childish politics. >>>>This is
not in anyone's interests other than the devious ACT party who want a >>>>Trump-like manufactured confusion and the distraction of dissent. >>>Horseshit.
Shame on the ACT Party, but shame on National as well.
effectively saying that binding agreements are not safe with this >>>>governmentNo it is not.
- sanctity of contract only applies as far as they want itThe last government was shameful, your political rhetoric is also shameful >>>Honesty is foreign to you, but not to most of us.
to . . . a day of great shame to all of the current government.
You got it Tony. Rich cannot bring himself to accept that the last
Labour Government vacated the moral high ground with their racist
actions.
Which you cannot identify . . . .
On Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:49:42 +1300, Crash <[email protected]d>I am positive that Crash can identify that easily. as can I.
wrote:
On Tue, 19 Nov 2024 03:19:52 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<[email protected]> wrote:
Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote:
An impressive and respectful gathering - on live stream at RNZ.Why?
Luxon will apparently appear - he needs to apologise for agreeing in a >>>>coalition agreement to give the Bill its first reading;
but he alsoWhy?
needs to apologise for agreeing to a long select committee hearing - >>>>that was not in any coalition agreement
- and all that time will allowThe dissent and resentment is caused elsewhere.
the Bill to foster dissent and resentment, and waste an enormous
amount of money.
No it is not.
This is an attempt by ACT to create dissent
- letting him succeed isNo, shame on you for being sio disingenuous and playing childish politics. >>>>This is
not in anyone's interests other than the devious ACT party who want a >>>>Trump-like manufactured confusion and the distraction of dissent. >>>Horseshit.
Shame on the ACT Party, but shame on National as well.
effectively saying that binding agreements are not safe with this >>>>governmentNo it is not.
- sanctity of contract only applies as far as they want itThe last government was shameful, your political rhetoric is also shameful >>>Honesty is foreign to you, but not to most of us.
to . . . a day of great shame to all of the current government.
You got it Tony. Rich cannot bring himself to accept that the last
Labour Government vacated the moral high ground with their racist
actions.
Which you cannot identify . . . .
Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote:
An impressive and respectful gathering - on live stream at RNZ.Why?
Luxon will apparently appear - he needs to apologise for agreeing in a >>coalition agreement to give the Bill its first reading;
but he alsoWhy?
needs to apologise for agreeing to a long select committee hearing -
that was not in any coalition agreement
- and all that time will allowThe dissent and resentment is caused elsewhere.
the Bill to foster dissent and resentment, and waste an enormous
amount of money.
No it is not.
This is an attempt by ACT to create dissent
- letting him succeed isHorseshit.
not in anyone's interests other than the devious ACT party who want a >>Trump-like manufactured confusion and the distraction of dissent.
No, shame on you for being sio disingenuous and playing childish politics. >>This is
Shame on the ACT Party, but shame on National as well.
effectively saying that binding agreements are not safe with this >>governmentNo it is not.
- sanctity of contract only applies as far as they want itThe last government was shameful, your political rhetoric is also shameful >Honesty is foreign to you, but not to most of us.
to . . . a day of great shame to all of the current government.
On Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:31:25 +1300, Rich80105 <[email protected]>
wrote:
On Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:49:42 +1300, Crash <[email protected]d> >>wrote:
On Tue, 19 Nov 2024 03:19:52 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<[email protected]> wrote:
Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote:
An impressive and respectful gathering - on live stream at RNZ.Why?
Luxon will apparently appear - he needs to apologise for agreeing in a >>>>>coalition agreement to give the Bill its first reading;
but he alsoWhy?
needs to apologise for agreeing to a long select committee hearing - >>>>>that was not in any coalition agreement
- and all that time will allowThe dissent and resentment is caused elsewhere.
the Bill to foster dissent and resentment, and waste an enormous >>>>>amount of money.
No it is not.
This is an attempt by ACT to create dissent
- letting him succeed isNo, shame on you for being sio disingenuous and playing childish politics. >>>>>This is
not in anyone's interests other than the devious ACT party who want a >>>>>Trump-like manufactured confusion and the distraction of dissent. >>>>Horseshit.
Shame on the ACT Party, but shame on National as well.
effectively saying that binding agreements are not safe with this >>>>>governmentNo it is not.
- sanctity of contract only applies as far as they want itThe last government was shameful, your political rhetoric is also shameful >>>>Honesty is foreign to you, but not to most of us.
to . . . a day of great shame to all of the current government.
You got it Tony. Rich cannot bring himself to accept that the last >>>Labour Government vacated the moral high ground with their racist >>>actions.
Which you cannot identify . . . .
There must be a new Rich80105 posting here - one that clearly arrived
in this ng just recently to replace the older and more moderate Rich
who has clearly been worn out with his defence of the modern
Labour-Green parties.
We have had 3 years with Labour having an absolute majority
Government. The old Rich would have been well aware of the He Puapua
report and the follow-up actions that Labour took without any
reference to it in their 2020 manifesto. That is what ended my >party-political neutrality on Labour vs National and you have seen all
this.
To the new Rich - with the Labour Government of 2020-2023 my politics
changed to abandon Labour completely. That does not mean that I
support National or ACT but I do find them to be more to my liking
than Labour or the Greens. Your predecessor might have understood why
even if they never conceded it.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 715 |
| Nodes: | 16 (3 / 13) |
| Uptime: | 19:19:02 |
| Calls: | 12,104 |
| Calls today: | 4 |
| Files: | 15,004 |
| Messages: | 6,518,092 |