So, the Destiny Church loonies are at it again ><https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/auckland-traffic-mayhem-expected-as-brian-tamaki-rally-travels-up-sh1/CUIE3EY5BZGJ5KKOLDCTIRR7OI/>.Nope. First of all there are very few right wingers in NZ. My bet is you have never met one.
This time, Brian Tamaki is saying it should be illegal to fly any flag
other than the official NZ one.
I thought right-wingers were in favour of “personal freedom”? Seems
their idea of “freedom” means “freedom” to agree with them, but not to >disagree.
So, the Destiny Church loonies are at it again ><https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/auckland-traffic-mayhem-expected-as-brian-tamaki-rally-travels-up-sh1/CUIE3EY5BZGJ5KKOLDCTIRR7OI/>.
This time, Brian Tamaki is saying it should be illegal to fly any flag
other than the official NZ one.
I thought right-wingers were in favour of �personal freedom�?
What is a "right-winger"?
On Sat, 16 Nov 2024 06:16:55 +1300, BR wrote:You wouldn't know a right winger if you saw one. None of those traits are right wing. They are all habits of nasty people.
What is a "right-winger"?
In Brian Tamaki’s case, somebody who would deny women the right to >abortion. Somebody who thinks of those of the LGBTQ community as less than >human. Somebody who doesn’t believe in separation of religion and state.
Does that describe you, BR?Why do left wingers so often take umbridge when someone disagrees with them or questions them? Why does it make them nasty, like your unnecessary and abusive question?
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <[email protected]d> wrote:
On Sat, 16 Nov 2024 06:16:55 +1300, BR wrote:wing. They are all habits of nasty people.
What is a "right-winger"?
In Brian Tamaki’s case, somebody who would deny women the right to >>abortion. Somebody who thinks of those of the LGBTQ community as less than >>human. Somebody who doesn’t believe in separation of religion and state. >You wouldn't know a right winger if you saw one. None of those traits are right
It may however be relevant to know if you are a supporter of BishopWhy do left wingers so often take umbridge when someone disagrees with them or >questions them? Why does it make them nasty, like your unnecessary and abusive >question?
Does that describe you, BR?
On Sat, 16 Nov 2024 06:16:55 +1300, BR wrote:
What is a "right-winger"?
In Brian Tamaki�s case, somebody who would deny women the right to
abortion.
On Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:24:37 -0000 (UTC), TonyYou are a liar - I have never said that.
<[email protected]> wrote:
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <[email protected]d> wrote:
On Sat, 16 Nov 2024 06:16:55 +1300, BR wrote:wing. They are all habits of nasty people.
What is a "right-winger"?
In Brian Tamaki’s case, somebody who would deny women the right to >>>abortion. Somebody who thinks of those of the LGBTQ community as less than >>>human. Somebody who doesn’t believe in separation of religion and state. >>You wouldn't know a right winger if you saw one. None of those traits are >>right
Since you have told us that there are no Right wingers in the country,
clearly you are wrong about Tamaki. I suggest however that Tamaki hasTotally off topic.
been a reasonable successful businessman, selling intangible beliefs
(which just happen to be very cheap to manufacture) for quite a lot of
money, and often to the detriment of those who join his
"congregation". That may of course give him a natural affinity for
the ACT and National Parties, but he does seem to avoid to close an >association. His "protest" against anyone flying a flag other than the
NZ flag is clearly a deliberate distraction - he does not want a more >balanced government that may create a better society where religious
leeches are seen more easily for what they are.
None of your business unless I decide to make it so.It may however be relevant to know if you are a supporter of BishopWhy do left wingers so often take umbridge when someone disagrees with them >>or
Does that describe you, BR?
questions them? Why does it make them nasty, like your unnecessary and >>abusive
question?
Tamaki, or of the views he apparently has regarding denial of women
having control of their bodies . . . Trump has been a good role model
for obscure promises.
On Fri, 15 Nov 2024 22:46:05 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro ><[email protected]d> wrote:Sure:
On Sat, 16 Nov 2024 06:16:55 +1300, BR wrote:
What is a "right-winger"?
In Brian Tamaki�s case, somebody who would deny women the right to >>abortion.
Never mind all that. Give me a definition.
Bill.
On Sun, 17 Nov 2024 06:56:53 +1300, BR <[email protected]> wrote:Correct, and there are not.
On Fri, 15 Nov 2024 22:46:05 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro >><[email protected]d> wrote:Sure:
On Sat, 16 Nov 2024 06:16:55 +1300, BR wrote:
What is a "right-winger"?
In Brian Tamaki�s case, somebody who would deny women the right to >>>abortion.
Never mind all that. Give me a definition.
Bill.
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/right-winger >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-wing_politics >https://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/right-winger >https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/right-winger >https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/right-winger
you may also get some ideas from: >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_political_parties_in_New_Zealand
and from
https://www.politicalcompass.org/nz2008
and
https://www.politicalcompass.org/nz2023
(Do you agree with the relative movements of ACT, National, NZ First,
Labour and Green Parties? - the commentary below the charts may also
be of interest.)
Various individuals may place political parties at different places on
such a chart - Tony for example has said that there are no right wing
parties in New Zealand;
presumably he sees National and possibly alsoAs I have said many times, centre right. Your left and right bits seem to have become confused.
ACT as either in the centre or slightly left.
As far as Brian Tamaki is concerned, he may see his views on abortion
as more a religious view than a political view, and his advocacy of
denial of abortion as being by divine command rather than his personal >authoritarianism; that he appears to support the far right
politically. Divine wisdom is of course convenient for the leader of a >religious cult; Tamaki is not a politician in the same sense as the
leaders of our political parties; he leads a religious cult, and his >expression of such beliefs is not seen as being partisan political in
the same way as would be such statements from a member of parliament - >although having said that, anti-abortion views, and the imposition of >restrictive laws relating to abortion do not appear to have avoided
Trump being elected President of the USA . . .
Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote:Rich is a liar, period!
Since you have told us that there are no Right wingers in the country,
On Fri, 15 Nov 2024 22:46:05 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Sat, 16 Nov 2024 06:16:55 +1300, BR wrote:
What is a "right-winger"?
In Brian Tamaki’s case, somebody who would deny women the right to
abortion. Somebody who thinks of those of the LGBTQ community as less
than human. Somebody who doesn’t believe in separation of religion and
state.
Does that describe you, BR?
Never mind all that.
On Sun, 17 Nov 2024 06:56:53 +1300, BR wrote:
On Fri, 15 Nov 2024 22:46:05 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Sat, 16 Nov 2024 06:16:55 +1300, BR wrote:
What is a "right-winger"?
In Brian Tamaki�s case, somebody who would deny women the right to
abortion. Somebody who thinks of those of the LGBTQ community as less
than human. Somebody who doesn�t believe in separation of religion and
state.
Does that describe you, BR?
Never mind all that.
Never mind the relevant points about Brian Tamaki?
That�s one way to avoid the question ...
On Sun, 17 Nov 2024 06:56:53 +1300, BR <[email protected]> wrote:
On Fri, 15 Nov 2024 22:46:05 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro >><[email protected]d> wrote:Sure:
On Sat, 16 Nov 2024 06:16:55 +1300, BR wrote:
What is a "right-winger"?
In Brian Tamaki�s case, somebody who would deny women the right to >>>abortion.
Never mind all that. Give me a definition.
Bill.
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/right-winger >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-wing_politics >https://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/right-winger >https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/right-winger >https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/right-winger
you may also get some ideas from: >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_political_parties_in_New_Zealand
and from
https://www.politicalcompass.org/nz2008
and
https://www.politicalcompass.org/nz2023
On Sat, 16 Nov 2024 23:48:04 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro ><[email protected]d> wrote:Already given - you posted objecting to the links! Remember?
On Sun, 17 Nov 2024 06:56:53 +1300, BR wrote:
On Fri, 15 Nov 2024 22:46:05 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Sat, 16 Nov 2024 06:16:55 +1300, BR wrote:
What is a "right-winger"?
In Brian Tamaki�s case, somebody who would deny women the right to
abortion. Somebody who thinks of those of the LGBTQ community as less
than human. Somebody who doesn�t believe in separation of religion and >>>> state.
Does that describe you, BR?
Never mind all that.
Never mind the relevant points about Brian Tamaki?
That�s one way to avoid the question ...
I didn't mention Brian Tamaki, you did.
You are the one avoiding the initial question which is: What is a >"right-winger?"
How about a definition?
Bill.
On Sun, 17 Nov 2024 09:51:27 +1300, Rich80105 <[email protected]>Bill, there was a direct request for a definition - I gave that.
wrote:
On Sun, 17 Nov 2024 06:56:53 +1300, BR <[email protected]> wrote:
On Fri, 15 Nov 2024 22:46:05 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro >>><[email protected]d> wrote:Sure:
On Sat, 16 Nov 2024 06:16:55 +1300, BR wrote:
What is a "right-winger"?
In Brian Tamaki�s case, somebody who would deny women the right to >>>>abortion.
Never mind all that. Give me a definition.
Bill.
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/right-winger >>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-wing_politics >>https://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/right-winger >>https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/right-winger >>https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/right-winger
you may also get some ideas from: >>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_political_parties_in_New_Zealand
and from
https://www.politicalcompass.org/nz2008
and
https://www.politicalcompass.org/nz2023
You are lazy. Anyone can post links to support any conceivable
argument. If you have an argument, then why not make your own case for
it?
Bill.
On Sun, 17 Nov 2024 16:32:06 +1300, BR <[email protected]> wrote:He isn't, you are.
On Sat, 16 Nov 2024 23:48:04 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro >><[email protected]d> wrote:Already given - you posted objecting to the links! Remember?
On Sun, 17 Nov 2024 06:56:53 +1300, BR wrote:
On Fri, 15 Nov 2024 22:46:05 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Sat, 16 Nov 2024 06:16:55 +1300, BR wrote:
What is a "right-winger"?
In Brian Tamaki�s case, somebody who would deny women the right to
abortion. Somebody who thinks of those of the LGBTQ community as less >>>>> than human. Somebody who doesn�t believe in separation of religion and >>>>> state.
Does that describe you, BR?
Never mind all that.
Never mind the relevant points about Brian Tamaki?
That�s one way to avoid the question ...
I didn't mention Brian Tamaki, you did.
You are the one avoiding the initial question which is: What is a >>"right-winger?"
How about a definition?
Bill.
Brian Tamaki is in the Subject of the Thread - on topic by definition.
Why are you trying to avoid rational discussion, BR?
On Sun, 17 Nov 2024 16:26:41 +1300, BR <[email protected]> wrote:He isn't, you are.
On Sun, 17 Nov 2024 09:51:27 +1300, Rich80105 <[email protected]> >>wrote:Bill, there was a direct request for a definition - I gave that.
On Sun, 17 Nov 2024 06:56:53 +1300, BR <[email protected]> wrote:
On Fri, 15 Nov 2024 22:46:05 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro >>>><[email protected]d> wrote:Sure:
On Sat, 16 Nov 2024 06:16:55 +1300, BR wrote:
What is a "right-winger"?
In Brian Tamaki�s case, somebody who would deny women the right to >>>>>abortion.
Never mind all that. Give me a definition.
Bill.
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/right-winger >>>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-wing_politics >>>https://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/right-winger >>>https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/right-winger >>>https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/right-winger
you may also get some ideas from: >>>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_political_parties_in_New_Zealand >>>and from
https://www.politicalcompass.org/nz2008
and
https://www.politicalcompass.org/nz2023
You are lazy. Anyone can post links to support any conceivable
argument. If you have an argument, then why not make your own case for
it?
Bill.
Quoting sources is not lazy - but accusing others of being lazy
appears to be your trying to avoid the topic.
On Sun, 17 Nov 2024 16:32:06 +1300, BR <[email protected]> wrote:
On Sat, 16 Nov 2024 23:48:04 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro >><[email protected]d> wrote:Already given - you posted objecting to the links! Remember?
On Sun, 17 Nov 2024 06:56:53 +1300, BR wrote:
On Fri, 15 Nov 2024 22:46:05 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Sat, 16 Nov 2024 06:16:55 +1300, BR wrote:
What is a "right-winger"?
In Brian Tamaki�s case, somebody who would deny women the right to
abortion. Somebody who thinks of those of the LGBTQ community as less >>>>> than human. Somebody who doesn�t believe in separation of religion and >>>>> state.
Does that describe you, BR?
Never mind all that.
Never mind the relevant points about Brian Tamaki?
That�s one way to avoid the question ...
I didn't mention Brian Tamaki, you did.
You are the one avoiding the initial question which is: What is a >>"right-winger?"
How about a definition?
Bill.
Brian Tamaki is in the Subject of the Thread - on topic by definition.
Why are you trying to avoid rational discussion, BR?
On Sun, 17 Nov 2024 22:35:41 +1300, Rich80105 <[email protected]>And again to define "right-winger":
wrote:
On Sun, 17 Nov 2024 16:32:06 +1300, BR <[email protected]> wrote:
On Sat, 16 Nov 2024 23:48:04 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro >>><[email protected]d> wrote:Already given - you posted objecting to the links! Remember?
On Sun, 17 Nov 2024 06:56:53 +1300, BR wrote:
On Fri, 15 Nov 2024 22:46:05 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: >>>>>
On Sat, 16 Nov 2024 06:16:55 +1300, BR wrote:
What is a "right-winger"?
In Brian Tamaki�s case, somebody who would deny women the right to >>>>>> abortion. Somebody who thinks of those of the LGBTQ community as less >>>>>> than human. Somebody who doesn�t believe in separation of religion and >>>>>> state.
Does that describe you, BR?
Never mind all that.
Never mind the relevant points about Brian Tamaki?
That�s one way to avoid the question ...
I didn't mention Brian Tamaki, you did.
You are the one avoiding the initial question which is: What is a >>>"right-winger?"
How about a definition?
Bill.
Brian Tamaki is in the Subject of the Thread - on topic by definition.
Why are you trying to avoid rational discussion, BR?
Brian Tamaki was labeled a "right-winger".
What is that?
Bill.
On Mon, 18 Nov 2024 08:37:35 +1300, BR <[email protected]> wrote:Sarcasm is the lowest form of wit, in your case half way to the lowest form of wit.
On Sun, 17 Nov 2024 22:35:41 +1300, Rich80105 <[email protected]> >>wrote:And again to define "right-winger":
On Sun, 17 Nov 2024 16:32:06 +1300, BR <[email protected]> wrote:
On Sat, 16 Nov 2024 23:48:04 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro >>>><[email protected]d> wrote:Already given - you posted objecting to the links! Remember?
On Sun, 17 Nov 2024 06:56:53 +1300, BR wrote:
On Fri, 15 Nov 2024 22:46:05 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: >>>>>>
On Sat, 16 Nov 2024 06:16:55 +1300, BR wrote:
What is a "right-winger"?
In Brian Tamaki�s case, somebody who would deny women the right to >>>>>>> abortion. Somebody who thinks of those of the LGBTQ community as less >>>>>>> than human. Somebody who doesn�t believe in separation of religion and >>>>>>> state.
Does that describe you, BR?
Never mind all that.
Never mind the relevant points about Brian Tamaki?
That�s one way to avoid the question ...
I didn't mention Brian Tamaki, you did.
You are the one avoiding the initial question which is: What is a >>>>"right-winger?"
How about a definition?
Bill.
Brian Tamaki is in the Subject of the Thread - on topic by definition. >>>Why are you trying to avoid rational discussion, BR?
Brian Tamaki was labeled a "right-winger".
What is that?
Bill.
Sure:
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/right-winger >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-wing_politics >https://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/right-winger >https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/right-winger >https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/right-winger
you may also get some ideas from: >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_political_parties_in_New_Zealand
and from
https://www.politicalcompass.org/nz2008
and
https://www.politicalcompass.org/nz2023
(Do you agree with the relative movements of ACT, National, NZ First,
Labour and Green Parties? - the commentary below the charts may also
be of interest.)
Various individuals may place political parties at different places on
such a chart - Tony for example has said that there are no right wing
parties in New Zealand; presumably he sees National and possibly also
ACT as either in the centre or slightly left.
But of course we also need to consider whether Bill was being
deliberately evasive. . . .
A definition of "that":
https://www.google.com/search?q=definition+of+that
Happy to help, Bill. . .
Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote:Bill asked for help and I gave it willingly; you are beyond help,
On Mon, 18 Nov 2024 08:37:35 +1300, BR <[email protected]> wrote:Sarcasm is the lowest form of wit, in your case half way to the lowest form of >wit.
On Sun, 17 Nov 2024 22:35:41 +1300, Rich80105 <[email protected]> >>>wrote:And again to define "right-winger":
On Sun, 17 Nov 2024 16:32:06 +1300, BR <[email protected]> wrote:
On Sat, 16 Nov 2024 23:48:04 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro >>>>><[email protected]d> wrote:Already given - you posted objecting to the links! Remember?
On Sun, 17 Nov 2024 06:56:53 +1300, BR wrote:
On Fri, 15 Nov 2024 22:46:05 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: >>>>>>>
On Sat, 16 Nov 2024 06:16:55 +1300, BR wrote:
What is a "right-winger"?
In Brian Tamaki�s case, somebody who would deny women the right to >>>>>>>> abortion. Somebody who thinks of those of the LGBTQ community as less >>>>>>>> than human. Somebody who doesn�t believe in separation of religion and >>>>>>>> state.
Does that describe you, BR?
Never mind all that.
Never mind the relevant points about Brian Tamaki?
That�s one way to avoid the question ...
I didn't mention Brian Tamaki, you did.
You are the one avoiding the initial question which is: What is a >>>>>"right-winger?"
How about a definition?
Bill.
Brian Tamaki is in the Subject of the Thread - on topic by definition. >>>>Why are you trying to avoid rational discussion, BR?
Brian Tamaki was labeled a "right-winger".
What is that?
Bill.
Sure:
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/right-winger >>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-wing_politics >>https://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/right-winger >>https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/right-winger >>https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/right-winger
you may also get some ideas from: >>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_political_parties_in_New_Zealand
and from
https://www.politicalcompass.org/nz2008
and
https://www.politicalcompass.org/nz2023
(Do you agree with the relative movements of ACT, National, NZ First, >>Labour and Green Parties? - the commentary below the charts may also
be of interest.)
Various individuals may place political parties at different places on
such a chart - Tony for example has said that there are no right wing >>parties in New Zealand; presumably he sees National and possibly also
ACT as either in the centre or slightly left.
But of course we also need to consider whether Bill was being
deliberately evasive. . . .
A definition of "that":
https://www.google.com/search?q=definition+of+that
Happy to help, Bill. . .
You are ill.
On Sun, 17 Nov 2024 22:49:11 -0000 (UTC), TonyMore abuse then.
<[email protected]> wrote:
Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote:Bill asked for help and I gave it willingly; you are beyond help,
On Mon, 18 Nov 2024 08:37:35 +1300, BR <[email protected]> wrote:Sarcasm is the lowest form of wit, in your case half way to the lowest form >>of
On Sun, 17 Nov 2024 22:35:41 +1300, Rich80105 <[email protected]> >>>>wrote:And again to define "right-winger":
On Sun, 17 Nov 2024 16:32:06 +1300, BR <[email protected]> wrote:
On Sat, 16 Nov 2024 23:48:04 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro >>>>>><[email protected]d> wrote:Already given - you posted objecting to the links! Remember?
On Sun, 17 Nov 2024 06:56:53 +1300, BR wrote:
On Fri, 15 Nov 2024 22:46:05 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: >>>>>>>>
On Sat, 16 Nov 2024 06:16:55 +1300, BR wrote:
What is a "right-winger"?
In Brian Tamaki�s case, somebody who would deny women the right to >>>>>>>>> abortion. Somebody who thinks of those of the LGBTQ community as less >>>>>>>>> than human. Somebody who doesn�t believe in separation of religion and
state.
Does that describe you, BR?
Never mind all that.
Never mind the relevant points about Brian Tamaki?
That�s one way to avoid the question ...
I didn't mention Brian Tamaki, you did.
You are the one avoiding the initial question which is: What is a >>>>>>"right-winger?"
How about a definition?
Bill.
Brian Tamaki is in the Subject of the Thread - on topic by definition. >>>>>Why are you trying to avoid rational discussion, BR?
Brian Tamaki was labeled a "right-winger".
What is that?
Bill.
Sure:
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/right-winger >>>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-wing_politics >>>https://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/right-winger >>>https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/right-winger >>>https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/right-winger
you may also get some ideas from: >>>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_political_parties_in_New_Zealand >>>and from
https://www.politicalcompass.org/nz2008
and
https://www.politicalcompass.org/nz2023
(Do you agree with the relative movements of ACT, National, NZ First, >>>Labour and Green Parties? - the commentary below the charts may also
be of interest.)
Various individuals may place political parties at different places on >>>such a chart - Tony for example has said that there are no right wing >>>parties in New Zealand; presumably he sees National and possibly also
ACT as either in the centre or slightly left.
But of course we also need to consider whether Bill was being >>>deliberately evasive. . . .
A definition of "that":
https://www.google.com/search?q=definition+of+that
Happy to help, Bill. . .
wit.
You are ill.
Tony.
Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote:Indeed dictionaries are notorious for their political bias . . .
On Sun, 17 Nov 2024 22:49:11 -0000 (UTC), TonyMore abuse then.
<[email protected]> wrote:
Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote:Bill asked for help and I gave it willingly; you are beyond help,
On Mon, 18 Nov 2024 08:37:35 +1300, BR <[email protected]> wrote:Sarcasm is the lowest form of wit, in your case half way to the lowest form >>>of
On Sun, 17 Nov 2024 22:35:41 +1300, Rich80105 <[email protected]> >>>>>wrote:And again to define "right-winger":
On Sun, 17 Nov 2024 16:32:06 +1300, BR <[email protected]> wrote:
On Sat, 16 Nov 2024 23:48:04 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro >>>>>>><[email protected]d> wrote:Already given - you posted objecting to the links! Remember?
On Sun, 17 Nov 2024 06:56:53 +1300, BR wrote:
On Fri, 15 Nov 2024 22:46:05 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: >>>>>>>>>
On Sat, 16 Nov 2024 06:16:55 +1300, BR wrote:
What is a "right-winger"?
In Brian Tamaki�s case, somebody who would deny women the right to >>>>>>>>>> abortion. Somebody who thinks of those of the LGBTQ community as less
than human. Somebody who doesn�t believe in separation of religion and
state.
Does that describe you, BR?
Never mind all that.
Never mind the relevant points about Brian Tamaki?
That�s one way to avoid the question ...
I didn't mention Brian Tamaki, you did.
You are the one avoiding the initial question which is: What is a >>>>>>>"right-winger?"
How about a definition?
Bill.
Brian Tamaki is in the Subject of the Thread - on topic by definition. >>>>>>Why are you trying to avoid rational discussion, BR?
Brian Tamaki was labeled a "right-winger".
What is that?
Bill.
Sure:
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/right-winger >>>>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-wing_politics >>>>https://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/right-winger >>>>https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/right-winger >>>>https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/right-winger
you may also get some ideas from: >>>>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_political_parties_in_New_Zealand >>>>and from
https://www.politicalcompass.org/nz2008
and
https://www.politicalcompass.org/nz2023
(Do you agree with the relative movements of ACT, National, NZ First, >>>>Labour and Green Parties? - the commentary below the charts may also
be of interest.)
Various individuals may place political parties at different places on >>>>such a chart - Tony for example has said that there are no right wing >>>>parties in New Zealand; presumably he sees National and possibly also >>>>ACT as either in the centre or slightly left.
But of course we also need to consider whether Bill was being >>>>deliberately evasive. . . .
A definition of "that":
https://www.google.com/search?q=definition+of+that
Happy to help, Bill. . .
wit.
You are ill.
Tony.
You provided zero help, just silly biased politics.
On Mon, 18 Nov 2024 06:15:59 -0000 (UTC), TonySome are, some are not. But that is off topic and quite silly of you.
<[email protected]> wrote:
Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote:Indeed dictionaries are notorious for their political bias . . .
On Sun, 17 Nov 2024 22:49:11 -0000 (UTC), TonyMore abuse then.
<[email protected]> wrote:
Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote:Bill asked for help and I gave it willingly; you are beyond help,
On Mon, 18 Nov 2024 08:37:35 +1300, BR <[email protected]> wrote:Sarcasm is the lowest form of wit, in your case half way to the lowest form >>>>of
On Sun, 17 Nov 2024 22:35:41 +1300, Rich80105 <[email protected]> >>>>>>wrote:And again to define "right-winger":
On Sun, 17 Nov 2024 16:32:06 +1300, BR <[email protected]> wrote:
On Sat, 16 Nov 2024 23:48:04 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro >>>>>>>><[email protected]d> wrote:Already given - you posted objecting to the links! Remember?
On Sun, 17 Nov 2024 06:56:53 +1300, BR wrote:
On Fri, 15 Nov 2024 22:46:05 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: >>>>>>>>>>
On Sat, 16 Nov 2024 06:16:55 +1300, BR wrote:
What is a "right-winger"?
In Brian Tamaki�s case, somebody who would deny women the right to >>>>>>>>>>> abortion. Somebody who thinks of those of the LGBTQ community as >>>>>>>>>>>less
than human. Somebody who doesn�t believe in separation of religion >>>>>>>>>>>and
state.
Does that describe you, BR?
Never mind all that.
Never mind the relevant points about Brian Tamaki?
That�s one way to avoid the question ...
I didn't mention Brian Tamaki, you did.
You are the one avoiding the initial question which is: What is a >>>>>>>>"right-winger?"
How about a definition?
Bill.
Brian Tamaki is in the Subject of the Thread - on topic by definition. >>>>>>>Why are you trying to avoid rational discussion, BR?
Brian Tamaki was labeled a "right-winger".
What is that?
Bill.
Sure: >>>>>https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/right-winger >>>>>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-wing_politics >>>>>https://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/right-winger >>>>>https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/right-winger >>>>>https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/right-winger
you may also get some ideas from: >>>>>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_political_parties_in_New_Zealand >>>>>and from
https://www.politicalcompass.org/nz2008
and
https://www.politicalcompass.org/nz2023
(Do you agree with the relative movements of ACT, National, NZ First, >>>>>Labour and Green Parties? - the commentary below the charts may also >>>>>be of interest.)
Various individuals may place political parties at different places on >>>>>such a chart - Tony for example has said that there are no right wing >>>>>parties in New Zealand; presumably he sees National and possibly also >>>>>ACT as either in the centre or slightly left.
But of course we also need to consider whether Bill was being >>>>>deliberately evasive. . . .
A definition of "that":
https://www.google.com/search?q=definition+of+that
Happy to help, Bill. . .
wit.
You are ill.
Tony.
You provided zero help, just silly biased politics.
Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote:So which of the definitions was biased, or silly, Tony?
On Mon, 18 Nov 2024 06:15:59 -0000 (UTC), TonySome are, some are not. But that is off topic and quite silly of you.
<[email protected]> wrote:
Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote:Indeed dictionaries are notorious for their political bias . . .
On Sun, 17 Nov 2024 22:49:11 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>><[email protected]> wrote:More abuse then.
Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote:Bill asked for help and I gave it willingly; you are beyond help,
On Mon, 18 Nov 2024 08:37:35 +1300, BR <[email protected]> wrote:Sarcasm is the lowest form of wit, in your case half way to the lowest form
On Sun, 17 Nov 2024 22:35:41 +1300, Rich80105 <[email protected]> >>>>>>>wrote:And again to define "right-winger":
On Sun, 17 Nov 2024 16:32:06 +1300, BR <[email protected]> wrote:
On Sat, 16 Nov 2024 23:48:04 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro >>>>>>>>><[email protected]d> wrote:Already given - you posted objecting to the links! Remember?
On Sun, 17 Nov 2024 06:56:53 +1300, BR wrote:
On Fri, 15 Nov 2024 22:46:05 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Sat, 16 Nov 2024 06:16:55 +1300, BR wrote:
What is a "right-winger"?
In Brian Tamaki�s case, somebody who would deny women the right to >>>>>>>>>>>> abortion. Somebody who thinks of those of the LGBTQ community as >>>>>>>>>>>>less
than human. Somebody who doesn�t believe in separation of religion >>>>>>>>>>>>and
state.
Does that describe you, BR?
Never mind all that.
Never mind the relevant points about Brian Tamaki?
That�s one way to avoid the question ...
I didn't mention Brian Tamaki, you did.
You are the one avoiding the initial question which is: What is a >>>>>>>>>"right-winger?"
How about a definition?
Bill.
Brian Tamaki is in the Subject of the Thread - on topic by definition. >>>>>>>>Why are you trying to avoid rational discussion, BR?
Brian Tamaki was labeled a "right-winger".
What is that?
Bill.
Sure: >>>>>>https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/right-winger >>>>>>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-wing_politics >>>>>>https://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/right-winger >>>>>>https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/right-winger >>>>>>https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/right-winger
you may also get some ideas from: >>>>>>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_political_parties_in_New_Zealand >>>>>>and from
https://www.politicalcompass.org/nz2008
and
https://www.politicalcompass.org/nz2023
(Do you agree with the relative movements of ACT, National, NZ First, >>>>>>Labour and Green Parties? - the commentary below the charts may also >>>>>>be of interest.)
Various individuals may place political parties at different places on >>>>>>such a chart - Tony for example has said that there are no right wing >>>>>>parties in New Zealand; presumably he sees National and possibly also >>>>>>ACT as either in the centre or slightly left.
But of course we also need to consider whether Bill was being >>>>>>deliberately evasive. . . .
A definition of "that":
https://www.google.com/search?q=definition+of+that
Happy to help, Bill. . .
of
wit.
You are ill.
Tony.
You provided zero help, just silly biased politics.
On Mon, 18 Nov 2024 18:01:42 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<[email protected]> wrote:
Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote:So which of the definitions was biased, or silly, Tony?
On Mon, 18 Nov 2024 06:15:59 -0000 (UTC), TonySome are, some are not. But that is off topic and quite silly of you.
<[email protected]> wrote:
Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote:Indeed dictionaries are notorious for their political bias . . .
On Sun, 17 Nov 2024 22:49:11 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>><[email protected]> wrote:More abuse then.
Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote:Bill asked for help and I gave it willingly; you are beyond help, >>>>>Tony.
On Mon, 18 Nov 2024 08:37:35 +1300, BR <[email protected]> wrote:Sarcasm is the lowest form of wit, in your case half way to the lowest form
On Sun, 17 Nov 2024 22:35:41 +1300, Rich80105 <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>wrote:And again to define "right-winger":
On Sun, 17 Nov 2024 16:32:06 +1300, BR <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>
On Sat, 16 Nov 2024 23:48:04 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro >>>>>>>>>><[email protected]d> wrote:Already given - you posted objecting to the links! Remember?
On Sun, 17 Nov 2024 06:56:53 +1300, BR wrote:
On Fri, 15 Nov 2024 22:46:05 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Sat, 16 Nov 2024 06:16:55 +1300, BR wrote:
What is a "right-winger"?
In Brian Tamakis case, somebody who would deny women the right to
abortion. Somebody who thinks of those of the LGBTQ community as >>>>>>>>>>>>>less
than human. Somebody who doesnt believe in separation of religion
and
state.
Does that describe you, BR?
Never mind all that.
Never mind the relevant points about Brian Tamaki?
Thats one way to avoid the question ...
I didn't mention Brian Tamaki, you did.
You are the one avoiding the initial question which is: What is a >>>>>>>>>>"right-winger?"
How about a definition?
Bill.
Brian Tamaki is in the Subject of the Thread - on topic by definition. >>>>>>>>>Why are you trying to avoid rational discussion, BR?
Brian Tamaki was labeled a "right-winger".
What is that?
Bill.
Sure: >>>>>>>https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/right-winger >>>>>>>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-wing_politics >>>>>>>https://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/right-winger >>>>>>>https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/right-winger >>>>>>>https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/right-winger
you may also get some ideas from: >>>>>>>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_political_parties_in_New_Zealand >>>>>>>and from
https://www.politicalcompass.org/nz2008
and
https://www.politicalcompass.org/nz2023
(Do you agree with the relative movements of ACT, National, NZ First, >>>>>>>Labour and Green Parties? - the commentary below the charts may also >>>>>>>be of interest.)
Various individuals may place political parties at different places on >>>>>>>such a chart - Tony for example has said that there are no right wing >>>>>>>parties in New Zealand; presumably he sees National and possibly also >>>>>>>ACT as either in the centre or slightly left.
But of course we also need to consider whether Bill was being >>>>>>>deliberately evasive. . . .
A definition of "that":
https://www.google.com/search?q=definition+of+that
Happy to help, Bill. . .
of
wit.
You are ill.
You provided zero help, just silly biased politics.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 715 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 00:17:33 |
| Calls: | 12,097 |
| Calls today: | 5 |
| Files: | 15,003 |
| Messages: | 6,517,858 |