There is much in that article that is also relevant to New Zealand.No there is not you fool.
Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote: >>https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/article/2024/jun/20/tory-minister-need-labour-government
No there is not you fool.
There is much in that article that is also relevant to New Zealand.
The Guardian is as trustworthy a source of news as the Spinoff or No Right Tur >- all trash.
On Sat, 22 Jun 2024 04:08:19 -0000 (UTC), TonyNonsense - I am absolutely on topic discussing your biased post.
<[email protected]> wrote:
Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote: >>>https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/article/2024/jun/20/tory-minister-need-labour-government
No there is not you fool.
There is much in that article that is also relevant to New Zealand.
The Guardian is as trustworthy a source of news as the Spinoff or No Right >>Tur
- all trash.
You are off topic, Tony.
This article is effectively a statement by aIrrelevant, everything the Guardian publishes is politically driven, just like you.
past Conservative politician talking about an issue that he believes
has been so badly handled by his own party that he will vote for a
change of government. The issues he addresses have relevance for New
Zealand. All the Guardian is doing is publishing it - it is not an >editorial.
Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote:
On Sat, 22 Jun 2024 04:08:19 -0000 (UTC), TonyNonsense - I am absolutely on topic discussing your biased post.
<[email protected]> wrote:
Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/article/2024/jun/20/tory-minister-need-labour-government
No there is not you fool.
There is much in that article that is also relevant to New Zealand.
The Guardian is as trustworthy a source of news as the Spinoff or No Right >>>Tur
- all trash.
You are off topic, Tony.
This article is effectively a statement by aIrrelevant, everything the Guardian publishes is politically driven, just like >you.
past Conservative politician talking about an issue that he believes
has been so badly handled by his own party that he will vote for a
change of government. The issues he addresses have relevance for New >>Zealand. All the Guardian is doing is publishing it - it is not an >>editorial.
The article is completely irrelevant to this country and only you would be >deceived by it.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/article/2024/jun/20/tory-minister-need-labour-government
There is much in that article that is also relevant to New Zealand.
On Sat, 22 Jun 2024 20:41:18 -0000 (UTC), TonyNope, as usual you got it wrong.
<[email protected]> wrote:
Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote:
On Sat, 22 Jun 2024 04:08:19 -0000 (UTC), TonyNonsense - I am absolutely on topic discussing your biased post.
<[email protected]> wrote:
Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/article/2024/jun/20/tory-minister-need-labour-government
No there is not you fool.
There is much in that article that is also relevant to New Zealand.
The Guardian is as trustworthy a source of news as the Spinoff or No Right >>>>Tur
- all trash.
You are off topic, Tony.
This article is effectively a statement by aIrrelevant, everything the Guardian publishes is politically driven, just >>like
past Conservative politician talking about an issue that he believes
has been so badly handled by his own party that he will vote for a
change of government. The issues he addresses have relevance for New >>>Zealand. All the Guardian is doing is publishing it - it is not an >>>editorial.
you.
The article is completely irrelevant to this country and only you would be >>deceived by it.
So either you have read it, and do not understand that what affects
one of our major trading partners can also affect us, or you have not
read the article and are just mouthing off . . .
So, Starmer has won. Do you think this will make a difference to anything >important?
As I understand, Labour has a commitment in its Constitution to
recognizing the state of Palestine. But of course there is no deadline to >this.
Note that Jeremy Corbyn kept his seat, after being pushed out of the
Labour Party over his stance on Israel. And I think there are a few other >ex-Labour Independents like him as well.
Corbyn and those few others may have taken a few votes off Labour; I
think there was more at stake than his stance on Israel.
Keir Starmer is certainly different, and has often appeared to be very reserved and even timid in putting forward policies, but he did at times demonstrate that he had strong moral principles - this speech some time
ago shows that he will follow and respect the rule of law ...
On Sat, 06 Jul 2024 22:07:49 +1200, Rich80105 wrote:
Corbyn and those few others may have taken a few votes off Labour; I
think there was more at stake than his stance on Israel.
Did you notice that Starmer�s majority shrank a bit compared to the
previous election? Some credit must go to Andrew Feinstein, who ran
against him.
Feinstein served in the South African Parliament in the ANC alongside
Nelson Mandela.
On Mon, 08 Jul 2024 19:36:04 +1200, Rich80105 wrote:
Keir Starmer is certainly different, and has often appeared to be very
reserved and even timid in putting forward policies, but he did at times
demonstrate that he had strong moral principles - this speech some time
ago shows that he will follow and respect the rule of law ...
Will that include supporting the operations of the International Court of >Justice and the International Criminal Court, I wonder?
... the real impediment to international action is probably the UN
vetoes.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 715 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 152:46:07 |
| Calls: | 12,091 |
| Calls today: | 4 |
| Files: | 15,000 |
| Messages: | 6,517,652 |