• A bob each way

    From Gordon@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jun 10 08:08:30 2024
    https://www.stuff.co.nz/motoring/350305216/toyota-and-subarus-new-engines-could-be-game-changers

    If we buy into the CO2 is bad for global warming, the internal combustion engine is not guilty but rather the fuel.

    What this development signals is that pure EV sales are going to stall. If
    we go hybrid we can virtual signal to the green crowd while actually getting there without having to wait while the vehicle is charging on long(ish) road trip.

    We also do not need to have quite the upgrade to the power network.

    Hybrids are not the silver bullet but in the real world they may just rule
    the roads until the pure EV's are developed to remove the sticking points.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Gordon on Mon Jun 10 21:29:01 2024
    Gordon <[email protected]> wrote: >https://www.stuff.co.nz/motoring/350305216/toyota-and-subarus-new-engines-could-be-game-changers

    If we buy into the CO2 is bad for global warming, the internal combustion >engine is not guilty but rather the fuel.

    What this development signals is that pure EV sales are going to stall. If
    we go hybrid we can virtual signal to the green crowd while actually getting >there without having to wait while the vehicle is charging on long(ish) road >trip.

    We also do not need to have quite the upgrade to the power network.

    Hybrids are not the silver bullet but in the real world they may just rule >the roads until the pure EV's are developed to remove the sticking points.
    I have believed for some time that Hybrids are not a bad idea in the right environment. Full electric vehicles are another matter, too many unanswered questions for me.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Crash@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Tue Jun 11 11:05:10 2024
    On Mon, 10 Jun 2024 21:29:01 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    Gordon <[email protected]> wrote: >>https://www.stuff.co.nz/motoring/350305216/toyota-and-subarus-new-engines-could-be-game-changers

    If we buy into the CO2 is bad for global warming, the internal combustion >>engine is not guilty but rather the fuel.

    What this development signals is that pure EV sales are going to stall. If >>we go hybrid we can virtual signal to the green crowd while actually getting >>there without having to wait while the vehicle is charging on long(ish) road >>trip.

    We also do not need to have quite the upgrade to the power network.

    Hybrids are not the silver bullet but in the real world they may just rule >>the roads until the pure EV's are developed to remove the sticking points.
    I have believed for some time that Hybrids are not a bad idea in the right >environment. Full electric vehicles are another matter, too many unanswered >questions for me.

    "Full electric" does have its justification. It is without peer for
    short trips, usually around a city (i.e. as a town car). ICE engines
    emit most of their emissions when running at ambient (ie cold)
    temperatures and they are always running without oil lubrication at
    the same time. BEVs run the same from the beginning to end of a trip.

    I have a BEV used exclusively as a town car, backed up with an ICE car
    for use either as a second car or where the BEV is not appropriate.


    --
    Crash McBash

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jun 11 18:12:10 2024
    On Tue, 11 Jun 2024 11:05:10 +1200, Crash <[email protected]d>
    wrote:

    On Mon, 10 Jun 2024 21:29:01 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    Gordon <[email protected]> wrote: >>>https://www.stuff.co.nz/motoring/350305216/toyota-and-subarus-new-engines-could-be-game-changers

    If we buy into the CO2 is bad for global warming, the internal combustion >>>engine is not guilty but rather the fuel.

    What this development signals is that pure EV sales are going to stall. If >>>we go hybrid we can virtual signal to the green crowd while actually getting >>>there without having to wait while the vehicle is charging on long(ish) road >>>trip.

    We also do not need to have quite the upgrade to the power network.

    Hybrids are not the silver bullet but in the real world they may just rule >>>the roads until the pure EV's are developed to remove the sticking points. >>I have believed for some time that Hybrids are not a bad idea in the right >>environment. Full electric vehicles are another matter, too many unanswered >>questions for me.

    "Full electric" does have its justification. It is without peer for
    short trips, usually around a city (i.e. as a town car). ICE engines
    emit most of their emissions when running at ambient (ie cold)
    temperatures and they are always running without oil lubrication at
    the same time. BEVs run the same from the beginning to end of a trip.

    I have a BEV used exclusively as a town car, backed up with an ICE car
    for use either as a second car or where the BEV is not appropriate.

    Cost and convenience are the main drivers, but climate change concerns
    have a small impact as well. EVs tend to be more expensive to buy, but
    some believe they will hold value better than ICE; running costs
    include relative costs of petrol and electricity, and government
    imposed charges. Unfortunately recent changes to Road User Charges do
    not make it easy to compare ICE costs with EV or Hybrid costs. In
    particular, the basis for RUCs is seen as now penalising some EVs,
    while undercharging heavy freight vehicles. A light EV should pay less
    than a heavier EV, and vehicles should also be charged based on the
    level of emissions - the government has not got the mix right.

    Convenience is influenced by charging requirements, which may depend
    on whether electricity is easily provided where the vehicle is parked overnight. Moves by other countries to encourage EVs will affect us
    as manufacturers re-align to serve other markets; we will increase the popularity of EVs and HEVs, and eventually the government will realise
    that subsidising heavy road vehicles is more expensive than using rail
    - especially if electric powered rail is extended.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Crash@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jun 11 19:51:48 2024
    On Tue, 11 Jun 2024 18:12:10 +1200, Rich80105 <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    On Tue, 11 Jun 2024 11:05:10 +1200, Crash <[email protected]d>
    wrote:

    On Mon, 10 Jun 2024 21:29:01 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    Gordon <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>https://www.stuff.co.nz/motoring/350305216/toyota-and-subarus-new-engines-could-be-game-changers

    If we buy into the CO2 is bad for global warming, the internal combustion >>>>engine is not guilty but rather the fuel.

    What this development signals is that pure EV sales are going to stall. If >>>>we go hybrid we can virtual signal to the green crowd while actually getting
    there without having to wait while the vehicle is charging on long(ish) road
    trip.

    We also do not need to have quite the upgrade to the power network.

    Hybrids are not the silver bullet but in the real world they may just rule >>>>the roads until the pure EV's are developed to remove the sticking points. >>>I have believed for some time that Hybrids are not a bad idea in the right >>>environment. Full electric vehicles are another matter, too many unanswered >>>questions for me.

    "Full electric" does have its justification. It is without peer for
    short trips, usually around a city (i.e. as a town car). ICE engines
    emit most of their emissions when running at ambient (ie cold)
    temperatures and they are always running without oil lubrication at
    the same time. BEVs run the same from the beginning to end of a trip.

    I have a BEV used exclusively as a town car, backed up with an ICE car
    for use either as a second car or where the BEV is not appropriate.

    Cost and convenience are the main drivers, but climate change concerns
    have a small impact as well. EVs tend to be more expensive to buy, but
    some believe they will hold value better than ICE; running costs
    include relative costs of petrol and electricity, and government
    imposed charges. Unfortunately recent changes to Road User Charges do
    not make it easy to compare ICE costs with EV or Hybrid costs. In
    particular, the basis for RUCs is seen as now penalising some EVs,
    while undercharging heavy freight vehicles. A light EV should pay less
    than a heavier EV, and vehicles should also be charged based on the
    level of emissions - the government has not got the mix right.

    Convenience is influenced by charging requirements, which may depend
    on whether electricity is easily provided where the vehicle is parked >overnight. Moves by other countries to encourage EVs will affect us
    as manufacturers re-align to serve other markets; we will increase the >popularity of EVs and HEVs, and eventually the government will realise
    that subsidising heavy road vehicles is more expensive than using rail
    - especially if electric powered rail is extended.


    Jeepers Rich - verbal diarrhea. I bought a used BEV because it suited
    my use case and was cheaper to run. I charge exclusively at home once
    per week. I have no particular ideological motivations other than my
    BEV, even with RUCs, is cheaper to run than a petrol ICE equivalent. I
    also bought it at auction - with the make and model not fashionable in
    NZ, for considerably less than the minimum 'agreed value' available to
    insure it.


    --
    Crash McBash

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)