https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2024/04/christopher-luxon-has-seven-staffers-working-on-social-media-content-partly-paid-for-by-taxpayer.html?ref=ves-vid2

So Christopher Luxon has 7 full time people working social media
featuring Christopher Luxon - and he doesn't know how many are
employed by the Government.

I suspect there may be some OIA requests heading his way . . .

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote:

https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2024/04/christopher-luxon-has-seven-staffers-working-on-social-media-content-partly-paid-for-by-taxpayer.html?ref=ves-vid2

So Christopher Luxon has 7 full time people working social media
featuring Christopher Luxon - and he doesn't know how many are
employed by the Government.

I suspect there may be some OIA requests heading his way . . .

I suspect it's way less than Jabcinder had in her team.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Mutley <[email protected]> wrote:

Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote:

https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2024/04/christopher-luxon-has-seven-staffers-working-on-social-media-content-partly-paid-for-by-taxpayer.html?ref=ves-vid2

So Christopher Luxon has 7 full time people working social media
featuring Christopher Luxon - and he doesn't know how many are
employed by the Government.

I suspect there may be some OIA requests heading his way . . .

I suspect it's way less than Jabcinder had in her team.

The last government more than doubled the number of "communication" people, but that is apparently OK for a left wing autocracy.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 02:19:31 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<[email protected]> wrote:

Mutley <[email protected]> wrote:

Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote:

https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2024/04/christopher-luxon-has-seven-staffers-working-on-social-media-content-partly-paid-for-by-taxpayer.html?ref=ves-vid2

So Christopher Luxon has 7 full time people working social media >>>featuring Christopher Luxon - and he doesn't know how many are
employed by the Government.

I suspect there may be some OIA requests heading his way . . .

I suspect it's way less than Jabcinder had in her team.

The last government more than doubled the number of "communication" people, but
that is apparently OK for a left wing autocracy.

I'd be interested in the numbers for that, but I confidently predict
that Tony will be unable to provide them. However looking at it
another way I understand a lot of their work relates to Luxon being a
star on Tik Tok - well known and followed by those who are also
follicly challenged with his daily cream preparation. A service to the
world - as well as Tony's Prime Minister! Under the circumstances I
am sure most people understand that such 'special needs' justify
extensive expert assistance. On a totally different topic, I was sad
to hear that the cuts to "back room" jobs will mean that a lot of
disabled children will get less help than previously, and that it may
prevent some from attending school. Will they be counted in the
non-attendance statistics?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote:

On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 02:19:31 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<[email protected]> wrote:

Mutley <[email protected]> wrote:

Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote:

https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2024/04/christopher-luxon-has-seven-staffers-working-on-social-media-content-partly-paid-for-by-taxpayer.html?ref=ves-vid2

So Christopher Luxon has 7 full time people working social media >>>>featuring Christopher Luxon - and he doesn't know how many are
employed by the Government.

I suspect there may be some OIA requests heading his way . . .

I suspect it's way less than Jabcinder had in her team.

The last government more than doubled the number of "communication" people, >>but
that is apparently OK for a left wing autocracy.

I'd be interested in the numbers for that, but I confidently predict
that Tony will be unable to provide them. However looking at it
another way I understand a lot of their work relates to Luxon being a
star on Tik Tok - well known and followed by those who are also
follicly challenged with his daily cream preparation. A service to the
world - as well as Tony's Prime Minister! Under the circumstances I
am sure most people understand that such 'special needs' justify
extensive expert assistance. On a totally different topic, I was sad
to hear that the cuts to "back room" jobs will mean that a lot of
disabled children will get less help than previously, and that it may
prevent some from attending school. Will they be counted in the >non-attendance statistics?

The facts were published many times during the last government despite denials from the lying leaders of the time. Look it up before you disparage others.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 20:33:12 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<[email protected]> wrote:

Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote:

On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 02:19:31 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<[email protected]> wrote:

Mutley <[email protected]> wrote:

Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote:

https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2024/04/christopher-luxon-has-seven-staffers-working-on-social-media-content-partly-paid-for-by-taxpayer.html?ref=ves-vid2

So Christopher Luxon has 7 full time people working social media >>>>>featuring Christopher Luxon - and he doesn't know how many are >>>>>employed by the Government.

I suspect there may be some OIA requests heading his way . . .

I suspect it's way less than Jabcinder had in her team.

The last government more than doubled the number of "communication" people, >>>but
that is apparently OK for a left wing autocracy.

I'd be interested in the numbers for that, but I confidently predict
that Tony will be unable to provide them. However looking at it
another way I understand a lot of their work relates to Luxon being a
star on Tik Tok - well known and followed by those who are also
follicly challenged with his daily cream preparation. A service to the >>world - as well as Tony's Prime Minister! Under the circumstances I
am sure most people understand that such 'special needs' justify
extensive expert assistance. On a totally different topic, I was sad
to hear that the cuts to "back room" jobs will mean that a lot of
disabled children will get less help than previously, and that it may >>prevent some from attending school. Will they be counted in the >>non-attendance statistics?

The facts were published many times during the last government despite denials >from the lying leaders of the time. Look it up before you disparage others. Now you are being silly, Tony. I don't even know if Luxon was on

Tik-Tok at the time he became Leader. I deplore the shallow rhetoric
of those that refer to "Lyin Luxon", and am disappointed that you
should follow that shallow rhetoric yourself. While you may be
disappointed by the reduced support for disabled children, I am sure
he is doing his best, and does not deserve your shallow attack

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote:

On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 20:33:12 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<[email protected]> wrote:

Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote:

On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 02:19:31 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<[email protected]> wrote:

Mutley <[email protected]> wrote:

Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote:

https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2024/04/christopher-luxon-has-seven-staffers-working-on-social-media-content-partly-paid-for-by-taxpayer.html?ref=ves-vid2

So Christopher Luxon has 7 full time people working social media >>>>>>featuring Christopher Luxon - and he doesn't know how many are >>>>>>employed by the Government.

I suspect there may be some OIA requests heading his way . . .

I suspect it's way less than Jabcinder had in her team.

The last government more than doubled the number of "communication" people, >>>>but
that is apparently OK for a left wing autocracy.

I'd be interested in the numbers for that, but I confidently predict
that Tony will be unable to provide them. However looking at it
another way I understand a lot of their work relates to Luxon being a >>>star on Tik Tok - well known and followed by those who are also
follicly challenged with his daily cream preparation. A service to the >>>world - as well as Tony's Prime Minister! Under the circumstances I
am sure most people understand that such 'special needs' justify >>>extensive expert assistance. On a totally different topic, I was sad
to hear that the cuts to "back room" jobs will mean that a lot of >>>disabled children will get less help than previously, and that it may >>>prevent some from attending school. Will they be counted in the >>>non-attendance statistics?

The facts were published many times during the last government despite >>denials
from the lying leaders of the time. Look it up before you disparage others. Abusive sartcasm and deliberate twistng of my meaning removed.

Rich is a slimy peice of excrement worthy of zero respect from anyone, not even the cockroaches that he relies on for companionship, mating and for relatively intelligent conversation.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Fri, 19 Apr 2024 02:57:30 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<[email protected]> wrote:

Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote:

On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 20:33:12 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<[email protected]> wrote:

Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote:

On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 02:19:31 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>><[email protected]> wrote:

Mutley <[email protected]> wrote:

Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote:

https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2024/04/christopher-luxon-has-seven-staffers-working-on-social-media-content-partly-paid-for-by-taxpayer.html?ref=ves-vid2

So Christopher Luxon has 7 full time people working social media >>>>>>>featuring Christopher Luxon - and he doesn't know how many are >>>>>>>employed by the Government.

I suspect there may be some OIA requests heading his way . . .

I suspect it's way less than Jabcinder had in her team.

The last government more than doubled the number of "communication" people,
but
that is apparently OK for a left wing autocracy.

I'd be interested in the numbers for that, but I confidently predict >>>>that Tony will be unable to provide them. However looking at it
another way I understand a lot of their work relates to Luxon being a >>>>star on Tik Tok - well known and followed by those who are also >>>>follicly challenged with his daily cream preparation. A service to the >>>>world - as well as Tony's Prime Minister! Under the circumstances I
am sure most people understand that such 'special needs' justify >>>>extensive expert assistance. On a totally different topic, I was sad
to hear that the cuts to "back room" jobs will mean that a lot of >>>>disabled children will get less help than previously, and that it may >>>>prevent some from attending school. Will they be counted in the >>>>non-attendance statistics?

The facts were published many times during the last government despite >>>denials
from the lying leaders of the time. Look it up before you disparage others. >Abusive sartcasm and deliberate twistng of my meaning removed.

Rich is a slimy peice of excrement worthy of zero respect from anyone, not even
the cockroaches that he relies on for companionship, mating and for relatively >intelligent conversation.

That you believe deleting a post you do not agree with is an
appropriate answer to any post is more a reflection on your inability
to accept that not everyone agrees with you, Tony. You are like the
Shane Jones of nz.general, believing you can dictate what others
should believe, and believing that you are entitled to impose you will
on decisions without any consultation. You have a level of respect for Christopher Luxon that is lower than that from Seymour; your contempt
towards a duly elected leader is shameful.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote:

On Fri, 19 Apr 2024 02:57:30 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<[email protected]> wrote:

Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote:

On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 20:33:12 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<[email protected]> wrote:

Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote:

On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 02:19:31 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>><[email protected]> wrote:

Mutley <[email protected]> wrote:

Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote:

https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2024/04/christopher-luxon-has-seven-staffers-working-on-social-media-content-partly-paid-for-by-taxpayer.html?ref=ves-vid2

So Christopher Luxon has 7 full time people working social media >>>>>>>>featuring Christopher Luxon - and he doesn't know how many are >>>>>>>>employed by the Government.

I suspect there may be some OIA requests heading his way . . .

I suspect it's way less than Jabcinder had in her team.

The last government more than doubled the number of "communication" >>>>>>people,
but
that is apparently OK for a left wing autocracy.

I'd be interested in the numbers for that, but I confidently predict >>>>>that Tony will be unable to provide them. However looking at it >>>>>another way I understand a lot of their work relates to Luxon being a >>>>>star on Tik Tok - well known and followed by those who are also >>>>>follicly challenged with his daily cream preparation. A service to the >>>>>world - as well as Tony's Prime Minister! Under the circumstances I >>>>>am sure most people understand that such 'special needs' justify >>>>>extensive expert assistance. On a totally different topic, I was sad >>>>>to hear that the cuts to "back room" jobs will mean that a lot of >>>>>disabled children will get less help than previously, and that it may >>>>>prevent some from attending school. Will they be counted in the >>>>>non-attendance statistics?

The facts were published many times during the last government despite >>>>denials
from the lying leaders of the time. Look it up before you disparage others. >>Abusive sartcasm and deliberate twistng of my meaning removed.

Rich is a slimy peice of excrement worthy of zero respect from anyone, not >>even
the cockroaches that he relies on for companionship, mating and for >>relatively
intelligent conversation.

As above. Rich doubles down on his twisting of other posts, his defamation, his lying, his patently obvious sociopathy and hatred of ordinary New Zealanders and his fawning over a failed and discredited political belief system. What a baby, go away little man (I bet you are about 5 feet tall and exhibit little man syndrome with your daily swagger through life) and beg forgivesnees of those you have irrepairably damaged all of your miserable life.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Fri, 19 Apr 2024 04:46:25 -0000 (UTC)
Tony <[email protected]> wrote:

Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote:

On Fri, 19 Apr 2024 02:57:30 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<[email protected]> wrote:

Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote:

On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 20:33:12 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>><[email protected]> wrote:

Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote:

On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 02:19:31 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>><[email protected]> wrote:

Mutley <[email protected]> wrote:

Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote:

https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2024/04/christopher-luxon-has-seven-staffers-working-on-social-media-content-partly-paid-for-by-taxpayer.html?ref=ves-vid2

So Christopher Luxon has 7 full time people working social >>>>>>>>media featuring Christopher Luxon - and he doesn't know how >>>>>>>>many are employed by the Government.

I suspect there may be some OIA requests heading his way . . >>>>>>>>.

I suspect it's way less than Jabcinder had in her team.

The last government more than doubled the number of >>>>>>"communication" people,
but
that is apparently OK for a left wing autocracy.

I'd be interested in the numbers for that, but I confidently >>>>>predict that Tony will be unable to provide them. However
looking at it another way I understand a lot of their work
relates to Luxon being a star on Tik Tok - well known and
followed by those who are also follicly challenged with his
daily cream preparation. A service to the world - as well as
Tony's Prime Minister! Under the circumstances I am sure most >>>>>people understand that such 'special needs' justify extensive >>>>>expert assistance. On a totally different topic, I was sad to
hear that the cuts to "back room" jobs will mean that a lot of >>>>>disabled children will get less help than previously, and that
it may prevent some from attending school. Will they be counted
in the non-attendance statistics?

The facts were published many times during the last government >>>>despite denials
from the lying leaders of the time. Look it up before you
disparage others.

Abusive sartcasm and deliberate twistng of my meaning removed.
Rich is a slimy peice of excrement worthy of zero respect from
anyone, not even
the cockroaches that he relies on for companionship, mating and for >>relatively
intelligent conversation.

As above. Rich doubles down on his twisting of other posts, his
defamation, his lying, his patently obvious sociopathy and hatred of
ordinary New Zealanders and his fawning over a failed and discredited political belief system. What a baby, go away little man (I bet you
are about 5 feet tall and exhibit little man syndrome with your daily
swagger through life) and beg forgivesnees of those you have
irrepairably damaged all of your miserable life.

Without question he is evil to the very core of what used to be his
soul.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Fri, 19 Apr 2024 15:30:21 +1200
Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote:

your contempt
towards a duly elected leader is shameful.

Your servile fawning to any authority (even illegitimate),
debate denialism, and manifest and total deceit in all that you say
and believe is despicable to the core!

HELL is coming for you motherfucker, make fucking book on that!

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)