https://www.stuff.co.nz/nz-news/350235186/life-infinitely-better-former-kiwi-cop-who-moved-aussie
Ponder:
* Apparently the pay offer now being discussed with Police in New
Zealand is lower than was offered under Labour
Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote:What an excellent question.
https://www.stuff.co.nz/nz-news/350235186/life-infinitely-better-former-kiwi-cop-who-moved-aussieWhy didn't the police take the payrise under Labor??
Ponder:
* Apparently the pay offer now being discussed with Police in New
Zealand is lower than was offered under Labour
Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote:
https://www.stuff.co.nz/nz-news/350235186/life-infinitely-better-former-kiwi-cop-who-moved-aussieWhy didn't the police take the payrise under Labor??
Ponder:
* Apparently the pay offer now being discussed with Police in New
Zealand is lower than was offered under Labour
On Mon, 08 Apr 2024 15:37:00 +1200, Mutley <[email protected]>Not at the time under discusiion, National were not in power and could offer nothing. Sheesh!
wrote:
Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote:
Why didn't the police take the payrise under Labor??https://www.stuff.co.nz/nz-news/350235186/life-infinitely-better-former-kiwi-cop-who-moved-aussie
Ponder:
* Apparently the pay offer now being discussed with Police in New >>>Zealand is lower than was offered under Labour
Because it wasn't enough
- and National were offering less than Labour
- I don't know if that has changed in the last day or so . . .And I know two that arrived from the UK last month. Swings and roundabouts.
Meanwhile we have already lost at lest one experienced cop to
Australia.
Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote:
On Mon, 08 Apr 2024 15:37:00 +1200, Mutley <[email protected]>
wrote:
Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote:
Why didn't the police take the payrise under Labor??https://www.stuff.co.nz/nz-news/350235186/life-infinitely-better-former-kiwi-cop-who-moved-aussie
Ponder:
* Apparently the pay offer now being discussed with Police in New >>>>Zealand is lower than was offered under Labour
Because it wasn't enough
- and National were offering less than LabourNot at the time under discusiion, National were not in power and could offer >nothing. Sheesh!
- I don't know if that has changed in the last day or so . . .And I know two that arrived from the UK last month. Swings and roundabouts. Indeed, but we are still short . . .
Meanwhile we have already lost at lest one experienced cop to
Australia.
On Mon, 8 Apr 2024 19:36:13 -0000 (UTC), TonySettled what?
<[email protected]> wrote:
Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote:
On Mon, 08 Apr 2024 15:37:00 +1200, Mutley <[email protected]> >>>wrote:Not at the time under discusiion, National were not in power and could offer >>nothing. Sheesh!
Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote:
Why didn't the police take the payrise under Labor??https://www.stuff.co.nz/nz-news/350235186/life-infinitely-better-former-kiwi-cop-who-moved-aussie
Ponder:
* Apparently the pay offer now being discussed with Police in New >>>>>Zealand is lower than was offered under Labour
Because it wasn't enough
- and National were offering less than Labour
So have they settled yet while offering less than Labour had?
Always have been and always will be - nothing has changed.- I don't know if that has changed in the last day or so . . .And I know two that arrived from the UK last month. Swings and roundabouts. >Indeed, but we are still short . . .
Meanwhile we have already lost at lest one experienced cop to
Australia.
Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote:Police pay negotiations . . .
On Mon, 8 Apr 2024 19:36:13 -0000 (UTC), TonySettled what?
<[email protected]> wrote:
Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote:
On Mon, 08 Apr 2024 15:37:00 +1200, Mutley <[email protected]> >>>>wrote:Not at the time under discusiion, National were not in power and could offer >>>nothing. Sheesh!
Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote:
Why didn't the police take the payrise under Labor??https://www.stuff.co.nz/nz-news/350235186/life-infinitely-better-former-kiwi-cop-who-moved-aussie
Ponder:
* Apparently the pay offer now being discussed with Police in New >>>>>>Zealand is lower than was offered under Labour
Because it wasn't enough
- and National were offering less than Labour
So have they settled yet while offering less than Labour had?
Always have been and always will be - nothing has changed.
- I don't know if that has changed in the last day or so . . .And I know two that arrived from the UK last month. Swings and roundabouts. >>Indeed, but we are still short . . .
Meanwhile we have already lost at lest one experienced cop to >>>>Australia.
On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 00:04:04 -0000 (UTC), TonySo you changed the subject once more.
<[email protected]> wrote:
Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote:Police pay negotiations . . .
On Mon, 8 Apr 2024 19:36:13 -0000 (UTC), TonySettled what?
<[email protected]> wrote:
Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote:
On Mon, 08 Apr 2024 15:37:00 +1200, Mutley <[email protected]> >>>>>wrote:Not at the time under discusiion, National were not in power and could >>>>offer
Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote:
Why didn't the police take the payrise under Labor??https://www.stuff.co.nz/nz-news/350235186/life-infinitely-better-former-kiwi-cop-who-moved-aussie
Ponder:
* Apparently the pay offer now being discussed with Police in New >>>>>>>Zealand is lower than was offered under Labour
Because it wasn't enough
- and National were offering less than Labour
nothing. Sheesh!
So have they settled yet while offering less than Labour had?
Always have been and always will be - nothing has changed.
- I don't know if that has changed in the last day or so . . .And I know two that arrived from the UK last month. Swings and roundabouts. >>>Indeed, but we are still short . . .
Meanwhile we have already lost at lest one experienced cop to >>>>>Australia.
On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 06:38:23 -0000 (UTC), TonyWrong.
<[email protected]> wrote:
Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote:The subject was about NZ police moving to Australia, and whether that
On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 00:04:04 -0000 (UTC), TonySo you changed the subject once more.
<[email protected]> wrote:
Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote:Police pay negotiations . . .
On Mon, 8 Apr 2024 19:36:13 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>><[email protected]> wrote:Settled what?
Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote:
On Mon, 08 Apr 2024 15:37:00 +1200, Mutley <[email protected]> >>>>>>>wrote:Not at the time under discusiion, National were not in power and could >>>>>>offer
Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote:
Why didn't the police take the payrise under Labor??https://www.stuff.co.nz/nz-news/350235186/life-infinitely-better-former-kiwi-cop-who-moved-aussie
Ponder:
* Apparently the pay offer now being discussed with Police in New >>>>>>>>>Zealand is lower than was offered under Labour
Because it wasn't enough
- and National were offering less than Labour
nothing. Sheesh!
So have they settled yet while offering less than Labour had?
I said National were not in power so could not offer anything. So how could >>they settle anything back then if they were not the government? Are you >>talking
time travel or some sort of mind warp?
related to the Coalition offering less in pay negotiations than Labour
had been offering.
The question was asked whether they had settled - which you did not >understand.
Always have been and always will be - nothing has changed.
Indeed, but we are still short . . .- I don't know if that has changed in the last day or so . . .And I know two that arrived from the UK last month. Swings and >>>>>>roundabouts.
Meanwhile we have already lost at lest one experienced cop to >>>>>>>Australia.
Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote:The subject was about NZ police moving to Australia, and whether that
On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 00:04:04 -0000 (UTC), TonySo you changed the subject once more.
<[email protected]> wrote:
Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote:Police pay negotiations . . .
On Mon, 8 Apr 2024 19:36:13 -0000 (UTC), TonySettled what?
<[email protected]> wrote:
Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote:
On Mon, 08 Apr 2024 15:37:00 +1200, Mutley <[email protected]> >>>>>>wrote:Not at the time under discusiion, National were not in power and could >>>>>offer
Rich80105 <[email protected]> wrote:
Why didn't the police take the payrise under Labor??https://www.stuff.co.nz/nz-news/350235186/life-infinitely-better-former-kiwi-cop-who-moved-aussie
Ponder:
* Apparently the pay offer now being discussed with Police in New >>>>>>>>Zealand is lower than was offered under Labour
Because it wasn't enough
- and National were offering less than Labour
nothing. Sheesh!
So have they settled yet while offering less than Labour had?
I said National were not in power so could not offer anything. So how could >they settle anything back then if they were not the government? Are you talking
time travel or some sort of mind warp?
Always have been and always will be - nothing has changed.
Indeed, but we are still short . . .- I don't know if that has changed in the last day or so . . .And I know two that arrived from the UK last month. Swings and roundabouts.
Meanwhile we have already lost at lest one experienced cop to >>>>>>Australia.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 715 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 158:29:40 |
| Calls: | 12,094 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 15,000 |
| Messages: | 6,517,756 |