1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. NZ.GENERAL

  • Time giving us an update

    From Gordon@21:1/5 to All on Mon Feb 26 04:21:18 2024
    https://www.stuff.co.nz/politics/350192873/stuart-nash-claims-labour-cabinet-softened-its-gang-asset-seizure-policy

    Well darn it all a Labour (ex) Minster getting hard on gangs.

    "Also there is a law in place, created by Labour, The changes to the
    Criminal Proceeds (Recovery) Act allowed police to go after gang
    leaders' properties, cars, bikes and bling, providing the assets were valued
    at $30,000 or above."

    To my mind all we need is the will power to take back the illegal assets.

    This is an artcle worth while reading as it gives some background.

    Rich advocates for the Labour side of things and yet I can not remember Rich drawing our attention to this act, which shows that Labour was working on
    the case and creating legislation.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Gordon on Mon Feb 26 05:58:02 2024
    Gordon <[email protected]> wrote: >https://www.stuff.co.nz/politics/350192873/stuart-nash-claims-labour-cabinet-softened-its-gang-asset-seizure-policy

    Well darn it all a Labour (ex) Minster getting hard on gangs.

    "Also there is a law in place, created by Labour, The changes to the
    Criminal Proceeds (Recovery) Act allowed police to go after gang
    leaders' properties, cars, bikes and bling, providing the assets were valued >at $30,000 or above."

    To my mind all we need is the will power to take back the illegal assets.

    This is an artcle worth while reading as it gives some background.

    Rich advocates for the Labour side of things and yet I can not remember Rich >drawing our attention to this act, which shows that Labour was working on
    the case and creating legislation.
    If true it is another disgrace.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)