Hello!
Is there any *English* newsgroup devoted to social networks, such as
Facebook and Instagram?
Facebook and Instagram belong to terrorist organization "Meta".*
*(In Russia you have to add this always -- as required by law.)
--
Yevgeniy S
[email protected]
https://usenetarchives.com/ also makes sense.
...[end quoted plain text]
https://www.usenetarchives.com/index.php?c=news.&p=18
news.groups >https://www.usenetarchives.com/threads.php?id=news.groups&y=0&r=0&p=1
Threads Date Replies
Reorganization (logic) 1986-11-08 0 >https://www.usenetarchives.com/view.php?id=news.groups&mid=PDM4MjJAbWl0LWVkZGllLk1JVC5FRFU%2B
Jeff Siegal
07/11/1986 15:14:33 UTC
I'm wondering:
Shouldn't comp.sys.mac be comp.sys.apple.mac?
" comp.sys.m6809 " comp.sys.mot.6809?
" comp.sys.m68k " comp.sys.mot.68k?
Just a thought.
Jeff Siegal
Hello!
Is there any *English* newsgroup devoted to social networks, such as
Facebook and Instagram?
Facebook and Instagram belong to terrorist organization "Meta".*
*(In Russia you have to add this always -- as required by law.)
We are not in Russia so just fuck off.
Putin is a loser. Look what happened to him in Syria!!
He couldn't even protect Assad
against unorganised terrorists.
I must be missing something here: what does all the jumble you've quoted
have to do wth Yevgeniy S's query? I've noticed that you often include
such stuff in your responses but I don't understand it at all.
Hello!
Is there any *English* newsgroup devoted to social networks, such as
Facebook and Instagram?
On 12/10/24 10:23, Steve Hayes wrote:
I don't know of any such newsgroup, but I do think such a newsgroup
would be useful, since so many people use social networks.
Perhaps rec.networking.social?
comp.internet.services.social-networks is what I actually thought about >recently.
11 Dec 2024 02:58:39 +0700, Yevgeniy S <[email protected]>:
On 12/10/24 10:23, Steve Hayes wrote:
I don't know of any such newsgroup, but I do think such a newsgroup
would be useful, since so many people use social networks.
Perhaps rec.networking.social?
comp.internet.services.social-networks is what I actually thought about >>recently.
Well you could have both, one emphasising the social aspect, and the
other the networking aspect.
But Usenet users are so diminished that one that one group might
suffice.
Steve Hayes <[email protected]> wrote:
11 Dec 2024 02:58:39 +0700, Yevgeniy S <[email protected]>: >>>On 12/10/24 10:23, Steve Hayes wrote:
I don't know of any such newsgroup, but I do think such a newsgroup >>>>would be useful, since so many people use social networks.
Perhaps rec.networking.social?
comp.internet.services.social-networks is what I actually thought about >>>recently.
Well you could have both, one emphasising the social aspect, and the
other the networking aspect.
But Usenet users are so diminished that one that one group might
suffice.
This should be seen as a troll. There are 10s of thousands of
newsgroups, the vast majority of which have failed. Yet "Yevgeniy S",
who isn't known anywhere on Usenet for discussing this topic, wants a
series of brand-new newsgroups.
If the proponent can't be bothered to discuss the topic himself, that's
a sure sign of a bad proponent.
Have discussion first. If somehow there is enough discussion to warrant
a separate newsgroup, then bring it up at that time, but there never
will be as "Yevgeniy S" has no interest in starting discussion himself.
Wed, 11 Dec 2024 16:19:25 -0000 (UTC), Adam H. Kerman <[email protected]>: >>Steve Hayes <[email protected]> wrote:
11 Dec 2024 02:58:39 +0700, Yevgeniy S <[email protected]>: >>>>On 12/10/24 10:23, Steve Hayes wrote:
I don't know of any such newsgroup, but I do think such a newsgroup >>>>>would be useful, since so many people use social networks.
Perhaps rec.networking.social?
comp.internet.services.social-networks is what I actually thought about >>>>recently.
Well you could have both, one emphasising the social aspect, and the >>>other the networking aspect.
But Usenet users are so diminished that one that one group might
suffice.
This should be seen as a troll. There are 10s of thousands of
newsgroups, the vast majority of which have failed. Yet "Yevgeniy S",
who isn't known anywhere on Usenet for discussing this topic, wants a >>series of brand-new newsgroups.
If the proponent can't be bothered to discuss the topic himself, that's
a sure sign of a bad proponent.
Have discussion first. If somehow there is enough discussion to warrant
a separate newsgroup, then bring it up at that time, but there never
will be as "Yevgeniy S" has no interest in starting discussion himself.
I think it best to start with a generic group, and only if traffic
relating to a specific instance becomes overwhelming should more
specific groups be set up.
So, if there were a general ng called rec.networking.social that had
low traffic, there would be no need to set up ngs for subsets like >rec.networking.social.instagram
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 715 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 23:23:01 |
| Calls: | 12,105 |
| Calls today: | 5 |
| Files: | 15,006 |
| Messages: | 6,518,142 |