With that attitude you are likely to be killfiled by many.
CLUE: Learn Usenet conventions.
Followup-To: alt.usenet.kooks
Blue-Maned_Hawk <[email protected]d> wrote:
Sn!pe wrote:
[...]
Apropos of not much: Your X-Face looks broken here.
On Sat, 9 Mar 2024 14:47:48 -0800, HenHanna wrote:
i'd like to see� more�� strange,� pretty� chars like these:
������������������� ??�
U+A9C1 JAVANESE LEFT RERENGGAN, U+A9C2 JAVANESE RIGHT RERENGGAN
Blue-Maned_Hawk <[email protected]d> wrote:
Sn!pe wrote:
Blue-Maned_Hawk <[email protected]d> wrote:
Sn!pe wrote:
[...]
Apropos of not much: Your X-Face looks broken here.
No, that's meant to look like that.
Really? Bizarre.
I noticed that elsewhere you use a different one that actually looks as
if it might be something.
Blue-Maned_Hawk <[email protected]d> wrote:
Sn!pe wrote:[...]
Apropos of not much: Your X-Face looks broken here.
No, that's meant to look like that.
Really? Bizarre.
I noticed that elsewhere you use a different one that actually looks
as if it might be something.
I did? Whereëver did i do that?
My mistake, I confused your X-Face with Blueshirt's in e-s.s; apologies.
I stand by my comment about your own X-Face;
what is it supposed to be?
vallor <[email protected]> wrote:[...snip encoded data...]
On Sun, 10 Mar 2024 14:24:48 +0000, [email protected] (Sn!pe) wrote in
<1qq7jrv.n1h8gnw6346N%[email protected]>:
Blue-Maned_Hawk <[email protected]d> wrote:
Sn!pe wrote:[...]
Apropos of not much: Your X-Face looks broken here.
No, that's meant to look like that.
Really? Bizarre.
I noticed that elsewhere you use a different one that actually looks
as if it might be something.
I did? Whereëver did i do that?
My mistake, I confused your X-Face with Blueshirt's in e-s.s; apologies. >> >
I stand by my comment about your own X-Face;
what is it supposed to be?
Give them time -- they just got their sig sorted.
I've just had another look at Blue-Maned_Hawk's X-Face.
He's encoded it, no wonder it doesn't work here.
This is his header (which I've had to rewrap so that it will post):-
-----
X-Face:
- which IMO is a pretty darned convoluted way of going about things.
HenHanna <[email protected]> wrote:
my X-Face???
(about 200 lines of high bit crap deleted here)
Yes, you have an X-Face in your header. I always thought those were silly, but if you're going to use it you might as well send something vaguely useful with it.
--scott
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 715 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 23:21:38 |
| Calls: | 12,105 |
| Calls today: | 5 |
| Files: | 15,006 |
| Messages: | 6,518,142 |