Apologies for not setting Followup-To on my original message so that this
reply showed up on news.announce.newgroups.
Charles Lindsey <
[email protected]> writes:
Why is it not also signed by he Old Key (weak as that may be).
It is. Why do you not think that it is? Maybe you're looking at it with
GnuPG v2, which doesn't support the ancient signature?
pub 4096R/FAFE7B550C18C8B7 2021-03-14 news.announce.newgroups
sig FAFE7B550C18C8B7 2021-03-14 [selfsig]
sig C25D3AD3B88DA9C1 2021-03-14 news.announce.newgroups
sig D15D313882004173 2021-03-14 [User ID not found]
sub 4096R/C9D50D98ED17C9A4 2021-03-14
sig FAFE7B550C18C8B7 2021-03-14 [keybind]
(D15D313882004173 is my personal key, which is not in that specific
keyring.)
Note that it is handy to keep a copy of the older gpg1 around for
documents signed by ancient PGP keys (as control messages for uk.* still are),
The uk.* folks should fix that. :)
--
Russ Allbery (
[email protected]) <
https://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)