• stats 2024 Q1 (1/2)

    From The Doctor@21:1/5 to All on Mon Apr 1 02:24:16 2024
    Group : news.admin.net-abuse.usenet
    Statistics : from 1/1/2024 to 3/31/2024

    ***** Users with most messages *****
    num| Name | Nb Msg |
    size | or. | % ----|----------------------------------------------------------|--------|---------|-----|------------------|
    1 | Adam H. Kerman | 78 | 233,521 | 0 | 10.17% xxxxxxxxxx
    2 | Eric M | 63 | 132,990 | 0 | 8.21% xxxxxxxx
    3 | llp | 59 | 161,222 | 4 | 7.69% xxxxxxx
    4 | Frank Slootweg | 53 | 171,705 | 0 | 6.91% xxxxxx
    5 | immibis | 40 |
    84,571 | 0 | 5.22% xxxxx
    6 | D | 30 |
    50,274 | 6 | 3.91% xxx
    7 | Adam W. | 29 |
    71,553 | 3 | 3.78% xxx
    8 | The Doctor | 28 | 281,830 | 3 | 3.65% xxx
    9 | Ray Banana | 28 |
    57,214 | 1 | 3.65% xxx
    10 | Scott Dorsey | 28 |
    45,169 | 0 | 3.65% xxx
    11 | Retro Guy | 21 |
    45,204 | 0 | 2.74% xx
    12 | Olivier Miakinen | 20 |
    48,903 | 0 | 2.61% xx
    13 | candycanearter07 | 19 |
    46,709 | 0 | 2.48% xx
    14 | Marco Moock | 18 |
    32,564 | 2 | 2.35% xx
    15 | Grant Taylor | 16 |
    67,774 | 0 | 2.09% xx
    16 | Tim Skirvin | 13 | 114,072 | 13 | 1.69% x
    17 | Sn!pe | 12 |
    38,919 | 1 | 1.56% x
    18 | noel | 12 |
    23,563 | 0 | 1.56% x
    19 | Spaceship | 11 |
    41,629 | 0 | 1.43% x
    20 | victor | 11 |
    24,456 | 0 | 1.43% x
    21 | Ivo Gandolfo | 11 |
    22,104 | 0 | 1.43% x
    22 | yamo' | 10 |
    21,313 | 0 | 1.30% x
    23 | Gunther F | 9 |
    31,405 | 1 | 1.17% x
    24 | R Daneel Olivaw | 9 |
    20,029 | 1 | 1.17% x
    25 | DV | 9 |
    29,215 | 0 | 1.17% x
    26 | Andrew | 8 |
    32,874 | 1 | 1.04% x
    27 | Indira | 6 |
    12,632 | 2 | 0.78%
    28 | Blueshirt | 6 |
    12,618 | 0 | 0.78%
    29 | Anonymous | 6 |
    10,391 | 0 | 0.78%
    30 | Spiros Bousbouras | 5 |
    11,388 | 1 | 0.65%
    31 | Jesse Rehmer | 4 |
    8,512 | 2 | 0.52%
    32 | ??????????Jen?????????? Dershmender ???????????????????? | 4 |
    14,886 | 1 | 0.52%
    33 | Chez | 4 |
    13,974 | 0 | 0.52%
    34 | Ricardo Hernandez | 4 |
    6,937 | 0 | 0.52%
    35 | faq | 3 |
    17,980 | 3 | 0.39%
    36 | Richard Harnden | 3 |
    7,650 | 2 | 0.39%
    37 | Julien ÉLIE | 3 |
    5,798 | 1 | 0.39%
    38 | Russ Allbery | 3 |
    5,901 | 0 | 0.39%
    39 | Dutch Spammer | 3 |
    4,660 | 0 | 0.39%
    40 | Nomen Nescio | 3 |
    4,203 | 0 | 0.39%
    41 | david | 2 |
    3,342 | 1 | 0.26%
    42 | Spam Report | 2 |
    2,663 | 1 | 0.26%
    43 | David Goodwin | 2 |
    5,313 | 0 | 0.26%
    44 | def | 2 |
    4,617 | 0 | 0.26%
    45 | Adam h. Kerman | 2 |
    4,593 | 0 | 0.26%
    46 | Jan K. | 2 |
    4,557 | 0 | 0.26%
    47 | Richard Kettlewell | 2 |
    4,510 | 0 | 0.26%
    48 | John | 2 |
    4,352 | 0 | 0.26%
    49 | Nigel Reed | 2 |
    3,701 | 0 | 0.26%
    50 | Andy Burns | 2 |
    3,497 | 0 | 0.26%
    51 | Ralph Fox | 2 |
    3,430 | 0 | 0.26%
    52 | Wolf Greenblatt | 2 |
    3,169 | 0 | 0.26%
    53 | Tom Furie | 2 |
    3,037 | 0 | 0.26%
    54 | SPAM Complaint | 1 |
    4,079 | 1 | 0.13%
    55 | Bright Idea | 1 |
    2,088 | 1 | 0.13%
    56 | Spooks Suck | 1 |
    2,080 | 1 | 0.13%
    57 | Spamtroller Info | 1 |
    2,072 | 1 | 0.13%
    58 | Spam Abuse Report | 1 |
    1,644 | 1 | 0.13%
    59 | SR912 | 1 |
    4,353 | 0 | 0.13%
    60 | Blue-Maned_Hawk | 1 |
    3,858 | 0 | 0.13%
    61 | V Martin | 1 |
    3,467 | 0 | 0.13%
    62 | Matija Nalis | 1 |
    3,099 | 0 | 0.13%
    63 | Computer Nerd Kev | 1 |
    3,086 | 0 | 0.13%
    64 | Jakob Bohm | 1 |
    2,984 | 0 | 0.13%
    65 | rogue server admin | 1 |
    2,940 | 0 | 0.13%
    66 | Seamus Godwin | 1 |
    2,718 | 0 | 0.13%
    67 | Jörg Lorenz | 1 |
    2,643 | 0 | 0.13%
    68 | Passing by | 1 |
    2,590 | 0 | 0.13%
    69 | wolfgang rothe | 1 |
    2,477 | 0 | 0.13%
    70 | Mr Ön!on | 1 |
    2,199 | 0 | 0.13%
    71 | bernie | 1 |
    2,146 | 0 | 0.13%
    72 | Scurvy Skirv Dog | 1 |
    2,144 | 0 | 0.13%
    73 | [email protected] | 1 |
    2,127 | 0 | 0.13%
    74 | Harry S Robins | 1 |
    2,093 | 0 | 0.13%
    75 | Enrico Papaloma | 1 |
    1,990 | 0 | 0.13%
    76 | Seamus | 1 |
    1,918 | 0 | 0.13%
    77 | A B | 1 |
    1,881 | 0 | 0.13%
    78 | Bill Powell | 1 |
    1,875 | 0 | 0.13%
    79 | Gelato | 1 |
    1,809 | 0 | 0.13%
    80 | Hello UseNet | 1 |
    1,756 | 0 | 0.13%
    81 | Nick Cine | 1 |
    1,671 | 0 | 0.13%
    82 | S. Frederico | 1 |
    1,636 | 0 | 0.13%
    83 | Mark Janson | 1 |
    1,569 | 0 | 0.13%
    84 | Hip Crime Boss | 1 |
    1,536 | 0 | 0.13%
    85 | Automated Spam Filter | 1 |
    1,442 | 0 | 0.13%
    86 | Mickey | 1 |
    1,384 | 0 | 0.13%
    87 | German Nazi Hunter | 1 |
    1,360 | 0 | 0.13%
    88 | Marco | 1 |
    1,339 | 0 | 0.13%
    89 | ##### Serial Japanese Spammer ##### | 1 |
    1,312 | 0 | 0.13%
    90 | KJ Jones | 1 |
    1,248 | 0 | 0.13%
    91 | Japanese Spammer | 1 |
    1,177 | 0 | 0.13%
    92 | [email protected] | 1 |
    1,050 | 0 | 0.13% ----|----------------------------------------------------------|--------|---------|-----|------------------|


    ***** Users with most started threads *****
    num| Name | or. |
    Nb Msg | size | % ----|----------------------------------------------------------|-----|--------|---------|------------------|
    1 | Tim Skirvin | 13 |
    13 | 114,072 | 23.64% xxxxxxxxxx
    2 | D | 6 |
    30 | 50,274 | 10.91% xxxx
    3 | llp | 4 |
    59 | 161,222 | 7.27% xxx
    4 | Adam W. | 3 |
    29 | 71,553 | 5.45% xx
    5 | The Doctor | 3 |
    28 | 281,830 | 5.45% xx
    6 | faq | 3 |
    3 | 17,980 | 5.45% xx
    7 | Marco Moock | 2 |
    18 | 32,564 | 3.64% x
    8 | Indira | 2 |
    6 | 12,632 | 3.64% x
    9 | Jesse Rehmer | 2 |
    4 | 8,512 | 3.64% x
    10 | Richard Harnden | 2 |
    3 | 7,650 | 3.64% x
    11 | Ray Banana | 1 |
    28 | 57,214 | 1.82%
    12 | Sn!pe | 1 |
    12 | 38,919 | 1.82%
    13 | Gunther F | 1 |
    9 | 31,405 | 1.82%
    14 | R Daneel Olivaw | 1 |
    9 | 20,029 | 1.82%
    15 | Andrew | 1 |
    8 | 32,874 | 1.82%
    16 | Spiros Bousbouras | 1 |
    5 | 11,388 | 1.82%
    17 | ??????????Jen?????????? Dershmender ???????????????????? | 1 |
    4 | 14,886 | 1.82%
    18 | Julien ÉLIE | 1 |
    3 | 5,798 | 1.82%
    19 | david | 1 |
    2 | 3,342 | 1.82%
    20 | Spam Report | 1 |
    2 | 2,663 | 1.82%
    21 | SPAM Complaint | 1 |
    1 | 4,079 | 1.82%
    22 | Bright Idea | 1 |
    1 | 2,088 | 1.82%
    23 | Spooks Suck | 1 |
    1 | 2,080 | 1.82%
    24 | Spamtroller Info | 1 |
    1 | 2,072 | 1.82%
    25 | Spam Abuse Report | 1 |
    1 | 1,644 | 1.82% ----|----------------------------------------------------------|-----|--------|---------|------------------|


    ***** Users with highest total size of messages *****
    num| Name | size
    | Nb Msg | or. | % ----|----------------------------------------------------------|---------|--------|-----|------------------|
    1 | The Doctor |
    281,830 | 28 | 3 | 12.79% xxxxxxxxxx
    2 | Adam H. Kerman |
    233,521 | 78 | 0 | 10.60% xxxxxxxx
    3 | Frank Slootweg |
    171,705 | 53 | 0 | 7.79% xxxxxx
    4 | llp |
    161,222 | 59 | 4 | 7.32% xxxxx
    5 | Eric M |
    132,990 | 63 | 0 | 6.03% xxxx
    6 | Tim Skirvin |
    114,072 | 13 | 13 | 5.18% xxxx
    7 | immibis |
    84,571 | 40 | 0 | 3.84% xxx
    8 | Adam W. |
    71,553 | 29 | 3 | 3.25% xx
    9 | Grant Taylor |
    67,774 | 16 | 0 | 3.08% xx
    10 | Ray Banana |
    57,214 | 28 | 1 | 2.60% xx
    11 | D |
    50,274 | 30 | 6 | 2.28% x
    12 | Olivier Miakinen |
    48,903 | 20 | 0 | 2.22% x
    13 | candycanearter07 |
    46,709 | 19 | 0 | 2.12% x
    14 | Retro Guy |
    45,204 | 21 | 0 | 2.05% x
    15 | Scott Dorsey |
    45,169 | 28 | 0 | 2.05% x
    16 | Spaceship |
    41,629 | 11 | 0 | 1.89% x
    17 | Sn!pe |
    38,919 | 12 | 1 | 1.77% x
    18 | Andrew |
    32,874 | 8 | 1 | 1.49% x
    19 | Marco Moock |
    32,564 | 18 | 2 | 1.48% x
    20 | Gunther F |
    31,405 | 9 | 1 | 1.42% x
    21 | DV |
    29,215 | 9 | 0 | 1.33% x
    22 | victor |
    24,456 | 11 | 0 | 1.11%
    23 | noel |
    23,563 | 12 | 0 | 1.07%
    24 | Ivo Gandolfo |
    22,104 | 11 | 0 | 1.00%
    25 | yamo' |
    21,313 | 10 | 0 | 0.97%
    26 | R Daneel Olivaw |
    20,029 | 9 | 1 | 0.91%
    27 | faq |
    17,980 | 3 | 3 | 0.82%
    28 | ??????????Jen?????????? Dershmender ???????????????????? |
    14,886 | 4 | 1 | 0.68%
    29 | Chez |
    13,974 | 4 | 0 | 0.63%
    30 | Indira |
    12,632 | 6 | 2 | 0.57%
    31 | Blueshirt |
    12,618 | 6 | 0 | 0.57%
    32 | Spiros Bousbouras |
    11,388 | 5 | 1 | 0.52%
    33 | Anonymous |
    10,391 | 6 | 0 | 0.47%
    34 | Jesse Rehmer |
    8,512 | 4 | 2 | 0.39%
    35 | Richard Harnden |
    7,650 | 3 | 2 | 0.35%
    36 | Ricardo Hernandez |
    6,937 | 4 | 0 | 0.31%
    37 | Russ Allbery |
    5,901 | 3 | 0 | 0.27%
    38 | Julien ÉLIE |
    5,798 | 3 | 1 | 0.26%
    39 | David Goodwin |
    5,313 | 2 | 0 | 0.24%
    40 | Dutch Spammer |
    4,660 | 3 | 0 | 0.21%
    41 | def |
    4,617 | 2 | 0 | 0.21%
    42 | Adam h. Kerman |
    4,593 | 2 | 0 | 0.21%
    43 | Jan K. |
    4,557 | 2 | 0 | 0.21%
    44 | Richard Kettlewell |
    4,510 | 2 | 0 | 0.20%
    45 | SR912 |
    4,353 | 1 | 0 | 0.20%
    46 | John |
    4,352 | 2 | 0 | 0.20%
    47 | Nomen Nescio |
    4,203 | 3 | 0 | 0.19%
    48 | SPAM Complaint |
    4,079 | 1 | 1 | 0.19%
    49 | Blue-Maned_Hawk |
    3,858 | 1 | 0 | 0.18%
    50 | Nigel Reed |
    3,701 | 2 | 0 | 0.17%
    51 | Andy Burns |
    3,497 | 2 | 0 | 0.16%
    52 | V Martin |
    3,467 | 1 | 0 | 0.16%
    53 | Ralph Fox |
    3,430 | 2 | 0 | 0.16%
    54 | david |
    3,342 | 2 | 1 | 0.15%
    55 | Wolf Greenblatt |
    3,169 | 2 | 0 | 0.14%
    56 | Matija Nalis |
    3,099 | 1 | 0 | 0.14%
    57 | Computer Nerd Kev |
    3,086 | 1 | 0 | 0.14%
    58 | Tom Furie |
    3,037 | 2 | 0 | 0.14%
    59 | Jakob Bohm |
    2,984 | 1 | 0 | 0.14%
    60 | rogue server admin |
    2,940 | 1 | 0 | 0.13%
    61 | Seamus Godwin |
    2,718 | 1 | 0 | 0.12%
    62 | Spam Report |
    2,663 | 2 | 1 | 0.12%
    63 | Jörg Lorenz |
    2,643 | 1 | 0 | 0.12%
    64 | Passing by |
    2,590 | 1 | 0 | 0.12%
    65 | wolfgang rothe |
    2,477 | 1 | 0 | 0.11%
    66 | Mr Ön!on |
    2,199 | 1 | 0 | 0.10%
    67 | bernie |
    2,146 | 1 | 0 | 0.10%
    68 | Scurvy Skirv Dog |
    2,144 | 1 | 0 | 0.10%
    69 | [email protected] |
    2,127 | 1 | 0 | 0.10%
    70 | Harry S Robins |
    2,093 | 1 | 0 | 0.09%
    71 | Bright Idea |
    2,088 | 1 | 1 | 0.09%
    72 | Spooks Suck |
    2,080 | 1 | 1 | 0.09%
    73 | Spamtroller Info |
    2,072 | 1 | 1 | 0.09%
    74 | Enrico Papaloma |
    1,990 | 1 | 0 | 0.09%
    75 | Seamus |
    1,918 | 1 | 0 | 0.09%
    76 | A B |
    1,881 | 1 | 0 | 0.09%
    77 | Bill Powell |
    1,875 | 1 | 0 | 0.09%
    78 | Gelato |
    1,809 | 1 | 0 | 0.08%
    79 | Hello UseNet |
    1,756 | 1 | 0 | 0.08%
    80 | Nick Cine |
    1,671 | 1 | 0 | 0.08%
    81 | Spam Abuse Report |
    1,644 | 1 | 1 | 0.07%
    82 | S. Frederico |
    1,636 | 1 | 0 | 0.07%
    83 | Mark Janson |
    1,569 | 1 | 0 | 0.07%
    84 | Hip Crime Boss |
    1,536 | 1 | 0 | 0.07%
    85 | Automated Spam Filter |
    1,442 | 1 | 0 | 0.07%
    86 | Mickey |
    1,384 | 1 | 0 | 0.06%
    87 | German Nazi Hunter |
    1,360 | 1 | 0 | 0.06%
    88 | Marco |
    1,339 | 1 | 0 | 0.06%
    89 | ##### Serial Japanese Spammer ##### |
    1,312 | 1 | 0 | 0.06%
    90 | KJ Jones |
    1,248 | 1 | 0 | 0.06%
    91 | Japanese Spammer |
    1,177 | 1 | 0 | 0.05%
    92 | [email protected] |
    1,050 | 1 | 0 | 0.05% ----|----------------------------------------------------------|---------|--------|-----|------------------|


    ***** Days with most messages *****
    num| date | Nb Msg | size | or. | % ----|------------|--------|---------|-----|------------------|
    1 | 1/10/2024 | 53 | 181,800 | 1 | 6.91% xxxxxxxxxx
    2 | 1/9/2024 | 34 | 77,080 | 1 | 4.43% xxxxxx
    3 | 2/26/2024 | 33 | 71,467 | 0 | 4.30% xxxxxx
    4 | 2/29/2024 | 32 | 72,455 | 2 | 4.17% xxxxxx
    5 | 2/28/2024 | 31 | 68,378 | 0 | 4.04% xxxxx
    6 | 1/6/2024 | 30 | 76,232 | 1 | 3.91% xxxxx
    7 | 1/19/2024 | 25 | 118,498 | 0 | 3.26% xxxx
    8 | 3/1/2024 | 23 | 79,750 | 2 | 3.00% xxxx
    9 | 1/7/2024 | 23 | 70,067 | 0 | 3.00% xxxx
    10 | 2/27/2024 | 23 | 47,249 | 0 | 3.00% xxxx
    11 | 2/22/2024 | 22 | 45,646 | 6 | 2.87% xxxx
    12 | 1/21/2024 | 22 | 55,478 | 0 | 2.87% xxxx
    13 | 2/21/2024 | 21 | 37,045 | 3 | 2.74% xxx
    14 | 3/5/2024 | 19 | 39,381 | 1 | 2.48% xxx
    15 | 2/25/2024 | 19 | 38,324 | 0 | 2.48% xxx
    16 | 1/8/2024 | 17 | 41,834 | 1 | 2.22% xxx
    17 | 2/20/2024 | 16 | 35,197 | 1 | 2.09% xxx
    18 | 2/3/2024 | 15 | 34,643 | 3 | 1.96% xx
    19 | 2/24/2024 | 15 | 36,809 | 2 | 1.96% xx
    20 | 2/19/2024 | 15 | 38,430 | 0 | 1.96% xx
    21 | 2/23/2024 | 15 | 29,722 | 0 | 1.96% xx
    22 | 2/7/2024 | 14 | 19,988 | 1 | 1.83% xx
    23 | 1/20/2024 | 12 | 59,662 | 1 | 1.56% xx
    24 | 1/18/2024 | 12 | 43,791 | 1 | 1.56% xx
    25 | 1/23/2024 | 12 | 25,902 | 1 | 1.56% xx
    26 | 1/16/2024 | 12 | 26,811 | 0 | 1.56% xx
    27 | 1/12/2024 | 11 | 32,386 | 0 | 1.43% xx
    28 | 1/17/2024 | 11 | 21,512 | 0 | 1.43% xx
    29 | 1/27/2024 | 10 | 36,063 | 1 | 1.30% x
    30 | 1/28/2024 | 9 | 15,445 | 2 | 1.17% x
    31 | 2/18/2024 | 9 | 26,165 | 1 | 1.17% x
    32 | 3/4/2024 | 9 | 21,141 | 0 | 1.17% x
    33 | 2/1/2024 | 8 | 71,718 | 2 | 1.04% x
    34 | 3/2/2024 | 8 | 20,901 | 1 | 1.04% x
    35 | 2/8/2024 | 8 | 14,009 | 0 | 1.04% x
    36 | 3/6/2024 | 8 | 13,185 | 0 | 1.04% x
    37 | 1/11/2024 | 7 | 16,880 | 2 | 0.91% x
    38 | 1/5/2024 | 7 | 23,021 | 1 | 0.91% x
    39 | 3/10/2024 | 7 | 19,323 | 1 | 0.91% x
    40 | 3/28/2024 | 7 | 13,124 | 1 | 0.91% x
    41 | 1/29/2024 | 7 | 11,827 | 0 | 0.91% x
    42 | 1/22/2024 | 6 | 9,905 | 2 | 0.78% x
    43 | 2/16/2024 | 6 | 11,634 | 0 | 0.78% x
    44 | 3/31/2024 | 5 | 8,923 | 1 | 0.65%
    45 | 3/12/2024 | 5 | 15,588 | 0 | 0.65%
    46 | 2/2/2024 | 5 | 7,898 | 0 | 0.65%
    47 | 3/30/2024 | 4 | 15,893 | 1 | 0.52%
    48 | 2/15/2024 | 4 | 9,462 | 1 | 0.52%
    49 | 1/1/2024 | 3 | 164,724 | 2 | 0.39%
    50 | 2/10/2024 | 3 | 13,018 | 1 | 0.39%
    51 | 2/11/2024 | 3 | 4,529 | 1 | 0.39%
    52 | 3/7/2024 | 3 | 10,707 | 0 | 0.39%
    53 | 3/18/2024 | 3 | 5,696 | 0 | 0.39%
    54 | 3/9/2024 | 2 | 12,852 | 2 | 0.26%
    55 | 3/16/2024 | 2 | 10,980 | 1 | 0.26%
    56 | 2/17/2024 | 2 | 10,567 | 1 | 0.26%
    57 | 1/15/2024 | 2 | 11,255 | 0 | 0.26%
    58 | 3/24/2024 | 2 | 4,644 | 0 | 0.26%
    59 | 3/15/2024 | 2 | 4,502 | 0 | 0.26%
    60 | 1/25/2024 | 2 | 4,124 | 0 | 0.26%
    61 | 1/13/2024 | 1 | 8,770 | 1 | 0.13%
    62 | 3/23/2024 | 1 | 8,770 | 1 | 0.13%
    63 | 1/26/2024 | 1 | 2,564 | 0 | 0.13%
    64 | 3/13/2024 | 1 | 2,471 | 0 | 0.13%
    65 | 2/4/2024 | 1 | 2,442 | 0 | 0.13%
    66 | 2/5/2024 | 1 | 2,146 | 0 | 0.13%
    67 | 1/31/2024 | 1 | 2,104 | 0 | 0.13%
    68 | 2/12/2024 | 1 | 2,056 | 0 | 0.13%
    69 | 1/24/2024 | 1 | 2,024 | 0 | 0.13%
    70 | 3/11/2024 | 1 | 2,008 | 0 | 0.13%
    71 | 3/8/2024 | 1 | 1,721 | 0 | 0.13%
    72 | 3/29/2024 | 1 | 1,617 | 0 | 0.13% ----|------------|--------|---------|-----|------------------|


    ***** Days with most messages *****
    num| date | Nb Msg | size | or. | % ----|------------|--------|---------|-----|------------------|
    1 | Wednesday | 141 | 348,507 | 5 | 18.38% xxxxxxxxxx
    2 | Tuesday | 121 | 267,208 | 4 | 15.78% xxxxxxxx
    3 | Saturday | 105 | 345,160 | 17 | 13.69% xxxxxxx
    4 | Thursday | 105 | 301,916 | 15 | 13.69% xxxxxxx
    5 | Sunday | 100 | 245,340 | 6 | 13.04% xxxxxxx
    6 | Monday | 98 | 382,489 | 5 | 12.78% xxxxxx
    7 | Friday | 97 | 313,313 | 3 | 12.65% xxxxxx ----|------------|--------|---------|-----|------------------|


    ***** Subjects with most answers *****
    num| Subject
    | Nb Msg | size | or. | % ----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|---------|-----|------------------|
    1 | Abusive cancel
    | 223 | 676,203 | 0 | 29.07% xxxxxxxxxx
    2 | Paganini: a rogue server ?
    | 102 | 230,617 | 1 | 13.30% xxxx
    3 | Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or
    subscriptions. Historic ... | 70 | 149,387 | 1 | 9.13% xxx
    4 | No spam in these nocems
    | 45 | 98,593 | 1 | 5.87% xx
    5 | Maybe the news server log doesn't even know what outgoing port I
    used? Maybe ... | 41 | 147,975 | 1 | 5.35% x
    6 | comp.terminals on paganini
    | 25 | 40,082 | 1 | 3.26% x
    7 | More Thai spam in comp.lang.cobol
    | 20 | 45,262 | 1 | 2.61%
    8 | False Positives (Paganini)
    | 17 | 39,273 | 1 | 2.22%
    9 | Google-groups [was: linked lists in Perl]
    | 15 | 37,764 | 1 | 1.96%
    10 | Re: new google groups articles still being posted . . .
    | 14 | 26,979 | 1 | 1.83%
    11 | Abavia and the bot-spam
    | 14 | 25,417 | 1 | 1.83%
    12 | tool to create nocem message
    | 14 | 22,827 | 1 | 1.83%
    13 | stats 2024 Jan
    | 13 | 75,964 | 1 | 1.69%
    14 | google groups announcement
    | 13 | 21,204 | 1 | 1.69%
    15 | strange message on alt.test
    | 12 | 24,359 | 1 | 1.56%
    16 | Re: [OT] Google Groups posting gone
    | 11 | 26,103 | 1 | 1.43%
    17 | yEnc-encoded articles in newsgroups
    | 11 | 21,807 | 1 | 1.43%
    18 | Re: Who is peering all these spams ostensibly from Google Groups?
    | 10 | 19,139 | 1 | 1.30%
    19 | Re: google prediction
    | 9 | 17,876 | 1 | 1.17%
    20 | FAQ: Current Usenet spam thresholds and guidelines
    | 8 | 20,576 | 1 | 1.04%
    21 | Spamtroller flooding in sci.crypt
    | 7 | 14,911 | 1 | 0.91%
    22 | The last unicorn or the rise of the hydra?
    | 5 | 9,646 | 1 | 0.65%
    23 | Nocem and Spam
    | 5 | 8,923 | 1 | 0.65%
    24 | the google diaspora
    | 5 | 6,200 | 1 | 0.65%
    25 | [DOC] NoCeM - What you need to know
    | 4 | 10,862 | 1 | 0.52%
    26 | Re: ding dong the wicked witch . . . ?
    | 4 | 6,126 | 1 | 0.52%
    27 | google groups counseling available
    | 4 | 5,346 | 1 | 0.52%
    28 | Re: <abuse> The Eternal Sucktember of the Wonderfully Hungry
    Pillsbury Pope | 4 | 8,482 | 0 | 0.52%
    29 | SPAM and abuse complaint regarding NewsDemon and their ilk
    | 3 | 12,806 | 1 | 0.39%
    30 | A new script...
    | 3 | 7,404 | 1 | 0.39%
    31 | Re: new google groups articles still being posted . . .
    | 3 | 5,664 | 1 | 0.39%
    32 | Bright Idea (was Re: Abusive cancel)
    | 3 | 5,126 | 1 | 0.39%
    33 | [DOC] NoCeM - What you need to know
    | 2 | 7,169 | 1 | 0.26%
    34 | CUMULATIVE AGGRESSION STRESS TROLLING
    | 2 | 4,110 | 1 | 0.26%
    35 | Re: 32 days . . .
    | 2 | 3,171 | 1 | 0.26%
    36 | Re: Buy Delta 9 THC Gummies - best delta 9 gummies - delta 9
    gummies reddit | 2 | 2,342 | 1 | 0.26%
    37 | stats 2023
    | 1 | 156,276 | 1 | 0.13%
    38 | stats 2024 Feb
    | 1 | 32,849 | 1 | 0.13%
    39 | FAQ: Current Usenet spam thresholds and guidelines
    | 1 | 8,853 | 1 | 0.13%
    40 | FAQ: Current Usenet spam thresholds and guidelines
    | 1 | 8,827 | 1 | 0.13%
    41 | FAQ: Current Usenet spam thresholds and guidelines
    | 1 | 8,786 | 1 | 0.13%
    42 | FAQ: Current Usenet spam thresholds and guidelines
    | 1 | 8,773 | 1 | 0.13%
    43 | FAQ: Current Usenet spam thresholds and guidelines
    | 1 | 8,771 | 1 | 0.13%
    44 | FAQ: Current Usenet spam thresholds and guidelines
    | 1 | 8,771 | 1 | 0.13%
    45 | FAQ: Current Usenet spam thresholds and guidelines
    | 1 | 8,770 | 1 | 0.13%
    46 | FAQ: Current Usenet spam thresholds and guidelines
    | 1 | 8,770 | 1 | 0.13%
    47 | FAQ: Current Usenet spam thresholds and guidelines
    | 1 | 8,770 | 1 | 0.13%
    48 | FAQ: Current Usenet spam thresholds and guidelines
    | 1 | 8,770 | 1 | 0.13%
    49 | FAQ: Current Usenet spam thresholds and guidelines
    | 1 | 8,713 | 1 | 0.13%
    50 | FAQ: Current Usenet spam thresholds and guidelines
    | 1 | 8,712 | 1 | 0.13%
    51 | [DOC] NoCeM - What you need to know
    | 1 | 6,004 | 1 | 0.13%
    52 | Re: 🏳️‍🌈new google groups articles still being posted🏳️‍🌈 | 1 | 3,443 | 1 | 0.13%
    53 | Spook Troll Tactics and Objectives
    | 1 | 2,080 | 1 | 0.13%
    54 | Re: ? ????? ???? ??? ??? ???? ???????? ? ????? pg ??????? ???????
    ????? ???? ... | 1 | 1,787 | 1 | 0.13%
    55 | Re: new google groups articles still being posted . . .
    | 1 | 1,341 | 1 | 0.13%
    56 | google groups/google search
    | 1 | 1,070 | 1 | 0.13%
    57 | Re: Buy Delta 9 THC Gummies - best delta 9 gummies - delta 9
    gummies reddit | 1 | 746 | 1 | 0.13%
    58 | Saint Shihtzu : Re-branding Chinese Hunger Torture as a Heavenly
    Diet Plan | 1 | 7,356 | 0 | 0.13%

    [continued in next message]

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Thomas Hochstein@21:1/5 to The Doctor on Mon Apr 1 12:48:09 2024
    The Doctor wrote:

    Group : news.admin.net-abuse.usenet
    Statistics : from 1/1/2024 to 3/31/2024

    If you find it necessary to post those statistics, could you do that
    without mangling them that badly?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From candycanearter07@21:1/5 to Thomas Hochstein on Mon Apr 1 15:16:34 2024
    Thomas Hochstein <[email protected]> wrote at 10:48 this Monday (GMT):
    The Doctor wrote:

    Group : news.admin.net-abuse.usenet
    Statistics : from 1/1/2024 to 3/31/2024

    If you find it necessary to post those statistics, could you do that
    without mangling them that badly?


    What do you mean by mangling?
    --
    user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Doctor@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Mon Apr 1 17:11:49 2024
    In article <[email protected]>,
    Thomas Hochstein <[email protected]> wrote:
    The Doctor wrote:

    Group : news.admin.net-abuse.usenet
    Statistics : from 1/1/2024 to 3/31/2024

    If you find it necessary to post those statistics, could you do that
    without mangling them that badly?

    How did I mangle it?
    --
    Member - Liberal International This is [email protected] Ici [email protected]
    Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Grant Taylor@21:1/5 to The Doctor on Mon Apr 1 19:14:43 2024
    On 4/1/24 12:11, The Doctor wrote:
    How did I mangle it?
    Something seems to be eating specific select white space.

    It's most predominant when the line is wrapped and continued on the next
    line. But it's also visible in the first four characters of the
    unwrapped lines.

    This is what I see in Thunderbird. -- I can't rule out a Thunderbird
    problem.

    num|_Name_____________________________________________________|_Nb_Msg_|_size____|_or._|_%
    ----|----------------------------------------------------------|--------|---------|-----|------------------|
    _1_|_Adam_H._Kerman___________________________________________|_____78_|_233,521_|___0_|_10.17%_xxxxxxxxxx
    _2_|_Eric_M___________________________________________________|_____63_|_132,990_|___0_|__8.21%_xxxxxxxx
    _3_|_llp______________________________________________________|_____59_|_161,222_|___4_|__7.69%_xxxxxxx
    _4_|_Frank_Slootweg___________________________________________|_____53_|_171,705_|___0_|__6.91%_xxxxxx
    _5_|_immibis__________________________________________________|_____40_|_84,571_|___0_|__5.22%_xxxxx
    _6_|_D________________________________________________________|_____30_|_50,274_|___6_|__3.91%_xxx
    _7_|_Adam_W.__________________________________________________|_____29_|_71,553_|___3_|__3.78%_xxx
    _8_|_The_Doctor_______________________________________________|_____28_|_281,830_|___3_|__3.65%_xxx
    _9_|_Ray_Banana_______________________________________________|_____28_|_57,214_|___1_|__3.65%_xxx
    10_|_Scott_Dorsey_____________________________________________|_____28_|_45,169_|___0_|__3.65%_xxx
    11_|_Retro_Guy________________________________________________|_____21_|_45,204_|___0_|__2.74%_xx
    12_|_Olivier_Miakinen_________________________________________|_____20_|_48,903_|___0_|__2.61%_xx
    13_|_candycanearter07_________________________________________|_____19_|_46,709_|___0_|__2.48%_xx
    14_|_Marco_Moock______________________________________________|_____18_|_32,564_|___2_|__2.35%_xx
    15_|_Grant_Taylor_____________________________________________|_____16_|_67,774_|___0_|__2.09%_xx
    16_|_Tim_Skirvin______________________________________________|_____13_|_114,072_|__13_|__1.69%_x
    17_|_Sn!pe____________________________________________________|_____12_|_38,919_|___1_|__1.56%_x
    18_|_noel_____________________________________________________|_____12_|_23,563_|___0_|__1.56%_x_

    This is what I see in the source for the same lines of the article.

    _num|_Name_____________________________________________________|_Nb_Msg_|_ size____|_or._|_% ----|----------------------------------------------------------|--------|---------|-----|------------------|
    __1_|_Adam_H._Kerman___________________________________________|_____78_|_ 233,521_|___0_|_10.17%_xxxxxxxxxx __2_|_Eric_M___________________________________________________|_____63_|_ 132,990_|___0_|__8.21%_xxxxxxxx __3_|_llp______________________________________________________|_____59_|_ 161,222_|___4_|__7.69%_xxxxxxx __4_|_Frank_Slootweg___________________________________________|_____53_|_ 171,705_|___0_|__6.91%_xxxxxx __5_|_immibis__________________________________________________|_____40_|_ _84,571_|___0_|__5.22%_xxxxx __6_|_D________________________________________________________|_____30_|_ _50,274_|___6_|__3.91%_xxx __7_|_Adam_W.__________________________________________________|_____29_|_ _71,553_|___3_|__3.78%_xxx __8_|_The_Doctor_______________________________________________|_____28_|_ 281,830_|___3_|__3.65%_xxx __9_|_Ray_Banana_______________________________________________|_____28_|_ _57,214_|___1_|__3.65%_xxx _10_|_Scott_Dorsey_____________________________________________|_____28_|_ _45,169_|___0_|__3.65%_xxx _11_|_Retro_Guy________________________________________________|_____21_|_ _45,204_|___0_|__2.74%_xx _12_|_Olivier_Miakinen_________________________________________|_____20_|_ _48,903_|___0_|__2.61%_xx _13_|_candycanearter07_________________________________________|_____19_|_ _46,709_|___0_|__2.48%_xx _14_|_Marco_Moock______________________________________________|_____18_|_ _32,564_|___2_|__2.35%_xx _15_|_Grant_Taylor_____________________________________________|_____16_|_ _67,774_|___0_|__2.09%_xx _16_|_Tim_Skirvin______________________________________________|_____13_|_ 114,072_|__13_|__1.69%_x _17_|_Sn!pe____________________________________________________|_____12_|_ _38,919_|___1_|__1.56%_x _18_|_noel_____________________________________________________|_____12_|_ _23,563_|___0_|__1.56%_x

    Unwrapped source

    _num|_Name_____________________________________________________|_Nb_Msg_|_ size____|_or._|_% ----|----------------------------------------------------------|--------|---------|-----|------------------|
    __1_|_Adam_H._Kerman___________________________________________|_____78_|_233,521_|___0_|_10.17%_xxxxxxxxxx
    __2_|_Eric_M___________________________________________________|_____63_|_132,990_|___0_|__8.21%_xxxxxxxx
    __3_|_llp______________________________________________________|_____59_|_161,222_|___4_|__7.69%_xxxxxxx
    __4_|_Frank_Slootweg___________________________________________|_____53_|_171,705_|___0_|__6.91%_xxxxxx
    __5_|_immibis__________________________________________________|_____40_|_84,571_|___0_|__5.22%_xxxxx
    __6_|_D________________________________________________________|_____30_|_50,274_|___6_|__3.91%_xxx
    __7_|_Adam_W.__________________________________________________|_____29_|_71,553_|___3_|__3.78%_xxx
    __8_|_The_Doctor_______________________________________________|_____28_|_281,830_|___3_|__3.65%_xxx
    __9_|_Ray_Banana_______________________________________________|_____28_|_57,214_|___1_|__3.65%_xxx
    _10_|_Scott_Dorsey_____________________________________________|_____28_|_45,169_|___0_|__3.65%_xxx
    _11_|_Retro_Guy________________________________________________|_____21_|_45,204_|___0_|__2.74%_xx
    _12_|_Olivier_Miakinen_________________________________________|_____20_|_48,903_|___0_|__2.61%_xx
    _13_|_candycanearter07_________________________________________|_____19_|_46,709_|___0_|__2.48%_xx
    _14_|_Marco_Moock______________________________________________|_____18_|_32,564_|___2_|__2.35%_xx
    _15_|_Grant_Taylor_____________________________________________|_____16_|_67,774_|___0_|__2.09%_xx
    _16_|_Tim_Skirvin______________________________________________|_____13_|_114,072_|__13_|__1.69%_x
    _17_|_Sn!pe____________________________________________________|_____12_|_38,919_|___1_|__1.56%_x
    _18_|_noel_____________________________________________________|_____12_|_23,563_|___0_|__1.56%_x

    I also question the value of these messages.

    I similarly question the value of the Usenet FAQ and the monthly stats
    articles are far more numerous. Sometimes they are even repeated in the
    same newsgroup.

    I've considered filtering them at my news server. I just haven't found sufficient round-2-its to do so /yet/.

    These articles aren't discussions in and of themselves. Just about
    every reply I've seen to them has been more of a complaint or discussion
    about the complaint.



    --
    Grant. . . .

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Grant Taylor@21:1/5 to Grant Taylor on Mon Apr 1 19:18:41 2024
    On 4/1/24 19:14, Grant Taylor wrote:
    I also question the value of these messages.
    ...
    These articles aren't discussions in and of themselves.  Just about
    every reply I've seen to them has been more of a complaint or discussion about the complaint.

    What's more is that these articles -- thankfully -- aren't posted to
    every newsgroup. So there seems to be some selection criteria.

    As such it makes me wonder if it's newsgroups that The Doctor is
    subscribing to and if it might be his reader that's posting them.

    Which makes them seem even less official and more noise hedging on spam.



    --
    Grant. . . .

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From R Daneel Olivaw@21:1/5 to Grant Taylor on Tue Apr 2 10:07:11 2024
    Grant Taylor wrote:
    On 4/1/24 12:11, The Doctor wrote:
    How did I mangle it?
    Something seems to be eating specific select white space.

    It's most predominant when the line is wrapped and continued on the next line.  But it's also visible in the first four characters of the
    unwrapped lines.

    This is what I see in Thunderbird.  --  I can't rule out a Thunderbird problem.

    num|_Name_____________________________________________________|_Nb_Msg_|_size____|_or._|_%

    ----|----------------------------------------------------------|--------|---------|-----|------------------|

    _1_|_Adam_H._Kerman___________________________________________|_____78_|_233,521_|___0_|_10.17%_xxxxxxxxxx

    _2_|_Eric_M___________________________________________________|_____63_|_132,990_|___0_|__8.21%_xxxxxxxx

    _3_|_llp______________________________________________________|_____59_|_161,222_|___4_|__7.69%_xxxxxxx

    _4_|_Frank_Slootweg___________________________________________|_____53_|_171,705_|___0_|__6.91%_xxxxxx

    _5_|_immibis__________________________________________________|_____40_|_84,571_|___0_|__5.22%_xxxxx

    _6_|_D________________________________________________________|_____30_|_50,274_|___6_|__3.91%_xxx

    _7_|_Adam_W.__________________________________________________|_____29_|_71,553_|___3_|__3.78%_xxx

    _8_|_The_Doctor_______________________________________________|_____28_|_281,830_|___3_|__3.65%_xxx

    _9_|_Ray_Banana_______________________________________________|_____28_|_57,214_|___1_|__3.65%_xxx

    10_|_Scott_Dorsey_____________________________________________|_____28_|_45,169_|___0_|__3.65%_xxx

    11_|_Retro_Guy________________________________________________|_____21_|_45,204_|___0_|__2.74%_xx

    12_|_Olivier_Miakinen_________________________________________|_____20_|_48,903_|___0_|__2.61%_xx

    13_|_candycanearter07_________________________________________|_____19_|_46,709_|___0_|__2.48%_xx

    14_|_Marco_Moock______________________________________________|_____18_|_32,564_|___2_|__2.35%_xx

    15_|_Grant_Taylor_____________________________________________|_____16_|_67,774_|___0_|__2.09%_xx

    16_|_Tim_Skirvin______________________________________________|_____13_|_114,072_|__13_|__1.69%_x

    17_|_Sn!pe____________________________________________________|_____12_|_38,919_|___1_|__1.56%_x

    18_|_noel_____________________________________________________|_____12_|_23,563_|___0_|__1.56%_x_


    This is what I see in the source for the same lines of the article.

    _num|_Name_____________________________________________________|_Nb_Msg_|_ size____|_or._|_% ----|----------------------------------------------------------|--------|---------|-----|------------------|

    __1_|_Adam_H._Kerman___________________________________________|_____78_|_ 233,521_|___0_|_10.17%_xxxxxxxxxx __2_|_Eric_M___________________________________________________|_____63_|_ 132,990_|___0_|__8.21%_xxxxxxxx __3_|_llp______________________________________________________|_____59_|_ 161,222_|___4_|__7.69%_xxxxxxx __4_|_Frank_Slootweg___________________________________________|_____53_|_ 171,705_|___0_|__6.91%_xxxxxx __5_|_immibis__________________________________________________|_____40_|_ _84,571_|___0_|__5.22%_xxxxx __6_|_D________________________________________________________|_____30_|_ _50,274_|___6_|__3.91%_xxx __7_|_Adam_W.__________________________________________________|_____29_|_ _71,553_|___3_|__3.78%_xxx __8_|_The_Doctor_______________________________________________|_____28_|_ 281,830_|___3_|__3.65%_xxx __9_|_Ray_Banana_______________________________________________|_____28_|_ _57,214_|___1_|__3.65%_xxx _10_|_Scott_Dorsey_____________________________________________|_____28_|_ _45,169_|___0_|__3.65%_xxx _11_|_Retro_Guy________________________________________________|_____21_|_ _45,204_|___0_|__2.74%_xx _12_|_Olivier_Miakinen_________________________________________|_____20_|_ _48,903_|___0_|__2.61%_xx _13_|_candycanearter07_________________________________________|_____19_|_ _46,709_|___0_|__2.48%_xx _14_|_Marco_Moock______________________________________________|_____18_|_ _32,564_|___2_|__2.35%_xx _15_|_Grant_Taylor_____________________________________________|_____16_|_ _67,774_|___0_|__2.09%_xx _16_|_Tim_Skirvin______________________________________________|_____13_|_ 114,072_|__13_|__1.69%_x _17_|_Sn!pe____________________________________________________|_____12_|_ _38,919_|___1_|__1.56%_x _18_|_noel_____________________________________________________|_____12_|_ _23,563_|___0_|__1.56%_x

    Unwrapped source

    _num|_Name_____________________________________________________|_Nb_Msg_|_ size____|_or._|_% ----|----------------------------------------------------------|--------|---------|-----|------------------|

    __1_|_Adam_H._Kerman___________________________________________|_____78_|_233,521_|___0_|_10.17%_xxxxxxxxxx

    __2_|_Eric_M___________________________________________________|_____63_|_132,990_|___0_|__8.21%_xxxxxxxx

    __3_|_llp______________________________________________________|_____59_|_161,222_|___4_|__7.69%_xxxxxxx

    __4_|_Frank_Slootweg___________________________________________|_____53_|_171,705_|___0_|__6.91%_xxxxxx

    __5_|_immibis__________________________________________________|_____40_|_84,571_|___0_|__5.22%_xxxxx

    __6_|_D________________________________________________________|_____30_|_50,274_|___6_|__3.91%_xxx

    __7_|_Adam_W.__________________________________________________|_____29_|_71,553_|___3_|__3.78%_xxx

    __8_|_The_Doctor_______________________________________________|_____28_|_281,830_|___3_|__3.65%_xxx

    __9_|_Ray_Banana_______________________________________________|_____28_|_57,214_|___1_|__3.65%_xxx

    _10_|_Scott_Dorsey_____________________________________________|_____28_|_45,169_|___0_|__3.65%_xxx

    _11_|_Retro_Guy________________________________________________|_____21_|_45,204_|___0_|__2.74%_xx

    _12_|_Olivier_Miakinen_________________________________________|_____20_|_48,903_|___0_|__2.61%_xx

    _13_|_candycanearter07_________________________________________|_____19_|_46,709_|___0_|__2.48%_xx

    _14_|_Marco_Moock______________________________________________|_____18_|_32,564_|___2_|__2.35%_xx

    _15_|_Grant_Taylor_____________________________________________|_____16_|_67,774_|___0_|__2.09%_xx

    _16_|_Tim_Skirvin______________________________________________|_____13_|_114,072_|__13_|__1.69%_x

    _17_|_Sn!pe____________________________________________________|_____12_|_38,919_|___1_|__1.56%_x

    _18_|_noel_____________________________________________________|_____12_|_23,563_|___0_|__1.56%_x


    I also question the value of these messages.

    I similarly question the value of the Usenet FAQ and the monthly stats articles are far more numerous.  Sometimes they are even repeated in the same newsgroup.

    I've considered filtering them at my news server.  I just haven't found sufficient round-2-its to do so /yet/.

    These articles aren't discussions in and of themselves.  Just about
    every reply I've seen to them has been more of a complaint or discussion about the complaint.




    I'm using Seamonkey (which The Doctor does not recognise) and everything
    looks fine apart from the "Subjects with most answers" table. All the
    entries go over two lines. Big deal. Apart from that, this mail comes
    once every three months so what's the point in filtering it?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Blueshirt@21:1/5 to Grant Taylor on Tue Apr 2 12:12:15 2024
    Grant Taylor wrote:

    On 4/1/24 12:11, The Doctor wrote:
    How did I mangle it?
    Something seems to be eating specific select white space.

    FWIW the stats are not mangled on my newsreader. (XanaNews)

    It's most predominant when the line is wrapped and continued
    on the next line. But it's also visible in the first four
    characters of the unwrapped lines.

    This is what I see in Thunderbird. -- I can't rule out a
    Thunderbird problem.

    Not seeing it here anyway so it's possibly the latter.

    [Snip]

    I also question the value of these messages.

    Some people might find them informative.

    I similarly question the value of the Usenet FAQ and the
    monthly stats articles are far more numerous. Sometimes they
    are even repeated in the same newsgroup.

    Too often and the stats posts can get annoying, quarterly and
    yearly would suffice. But they don't seem to do any harm... and
    I'm sure there are stat nerds out there that like that sort of
    thing.

    I've considered filtering them at my news server. I just
    haven't found sufficient round-2-its to do so yet.

    These articles aren't discussions in and of themselves. Just
    about every reply I've seen to them has been more of a
    complaint or discussion about the complaint.

    Easily skipped, ignored ... or filtered.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Adam H. Kerman@21:1/5 to Blueshirt on Tue Apr 2 15:28:12 2024
    Blueshirt <[email protected]> wrote:
    Grant Taylor wrote:
    On 4/1/24 12:11, The Doctor wrote:

    How did I mangle it?

    Something seems to be eating specific select white space.

    FWIW the stats are not mangled on my newsreader. (XanaNews)

    The table was mostly long lines and doesn't display properly on an 80
    character wide terminal emulation. But you had already observed that. I
    didn't spot the substitution of non-ASCII whitespace but that's likely
    to be another problem.

    It's most predominant when the line is wrapped and continued
    on the next line. But it's also visible in the first four
    characters of the unwrapped lines.

    This is what I see in Thunderbird. -- I can't rule out a
    Thunderbird problem.

    Not seeing it here anyway so it's possibly the latter.

    [Snip]

    I also question the value of these messages.

    Some people might find them informative.

    Thank you for including that comprehensive list of Usenet readers who
    find that yads makes an invaluable contribution. That was helpful.

    I similarly question the value of the Usenet FAQ and the
    monthly stats articles are far more numerous. Sometimes they
    are even repeated in the same newsgroup.

    Too often and the stats posts can get annoying, quarterly and
    yearly would suffice. But they don't seem to do any harm... and
    I'm sure there are stat nerds out there that like that sort of
    thing.

    No one likes that sort of thing. It's all about yads and his need to
    maintain an excessively high poast count in certain newsgroups.

    I was top ranked. What does that tell us? I rambled on, got into an
    excessively long useless discussion defending NoCeMs. Did readers not
    already figure that out without yads?

    As yads is not going to bake me a cake, there is just no way to defend
    anything he does. Always deyadify.

    . . .

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From candycanearter07@21:1/5 to Blueshirt on Tue Apr 2 15:40:03 2024
    Blueshirt <[email protected]> wrote at 10:12 this Tuesday (GMT):
    Grant Taylor wrote:

    On 4/1/24 12:11, The Doctor wrote:
    How did I mangle it?
    Something seems to be eating specific select white space.

    FWIW the stats are not mangled on my newsreader. (XanaNews)

    Not mangled on mine either (slrn)

    It's most predominant when the line is wrapped and continued
    on the next line. But it's also visible in the first four
    characters of the unwrapped lines.

    This is what I see in Thunderbird. -- I can't rule out a
    Thunderbird problem.

    Not seeing it here anyway so it's possibly the latter.

    [Snip]

    I also question the value of these messages.

    Some people might find them informative.

    I enjoy looking at them, and they're easy to ignore/filter locally if
    you don't care.

    I similarly question the value of the Usenet FAQ and the
    monthly stats articles are far more numerous. Sometimes they
    are even repeated in the same newsgroup.

    Too often and the stats posts can get annoying, quarterly and
    yearly would suffice. But they don't seem to do any harm... and
    I'm sure there are stat nerds out there that like that sort of
    thing.

    I've considered filtering them at my news server. I just
    haven't found sufficient round-2-its to do so yet.

    These articles aren't discussions in and of themselves. Just
    about every reply I've seen to them has been more of a
    complaint or discussion about the complaint.

    Easily skipped, ignored ... or filtered.


    maybe
    --
    user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Blueshirt@21:1/5 to Adam H. Kerman on Tue Apr 2 17:47:58 2024
    Adam H. Kerman wrote:

    As yads is not going to bake me a cake, there is just no way
    to defend anything he does. Always deyadify.

    That's why newsreaders have Bozo Bins and filters... ;-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Blueshirt@21:1/5 to All on Tue Apr 2 17:56:28 2024
    candycanearter07 wrote:

    Blueshirt <[email protected]> wrote at 10:12 this Tuesday
    (GMT):
    Grant Taylor wrote:

    I also question the value of these messages.

    Some people might find them informative.

    I enjoy looking at them, and they're easy to ignore/filter
    locally if you don't care.

    Exactly!

    I tend to ignore them mostly, but either way I wouldn't call
    stat posts abuse of Usenet.

    Now that we've lost the GG injected spam life on most newsgroups
    is fairly calm and a pleasure to peruse, so it is easy enough to
    just ignore the noise.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Olivier Miakinen@21:1/5 to All on Tue Apr 2 18:06:35 2024
    Hello The Doctor,

    Le 01/04/2024 19:11, The Doctor a �crit :

    Group : news.admin.net-abuse.usenet
    Statistics : from 1/1/2024 to 3/31/2024

    If you find it necessary to post those statistics, could you do that >>without mangling them that badly?

    How did I mangle it?

    The problem is with the format flowed, which makes impossible to send lines
    of more than 79 characters as soon as they contain at least one space. See <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2646>.

    Of course, the newsreaders that are prepared (and configured to) understand
    the format flowed don't see any problem since it is preciseley the purpose
    of this format. But for older newsreaders, or for users who deactivate this format they dislike, the mangling is real : <https://i.goopics.net/vruq6c.png>.

    With MesNews, I don't think that you can tell your newsreader to *not* use
    the format flowed for sending. But maybe you can do it with tin if you
    increase the maximal length of the lines.

    Best Regards,
    --
    Olivier Miakinen

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Doctor@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Tue Apr 2 16:12:40 2024
    In article <uugebf$1ep1e$[email protected]>,
    R Daneel Olivaw <[email protected]> wrote:
    Grant Taylor wrote:
    On 4/1/24 12:11, The Doctor wrote:
    How did I mangle it?
    Something seems to be eating specific select white space.

    It's most predominant when the line is wrapped and continued on the next
    line.  But it's also visible in the first four characters of the
    unwrapped lines.

    This is what I see in Thunderbird.  --  I can't rule out a Thunderbird
    problem.

    num|_Name_____________________________________________________|_Nb_Msg_|_size____|_or._|_%

    ----|----------------------------------------------------------|--------|---------|-----|------------------|

    _1_|_Adam_H._Kerman___________________________________________|_____78_|_233,521_|___0_|_10.17%_xxxxxxxxxx

    _2_|_Eric_M___________________________________________________|_____63_|_132,990_|___0_|__8.21%_xxxxxxxx

    _3_|_llp______________________________________________________|_____59_|_161,222_|___4_|__7.69%_xxxxxxx

    _4_|_Frank_Slootweg___________________________________________|_____53_|_171,705_|___0_|__6.91%_xxxxxx

    _5_|_immibis__________________________________________________|_____40_|_84,571_|___0_|__5.22%_xxxxx

    _6_|_D________________________________________________________|_____30_|_50,274_|___6_|__3.91%_xxx

    _7_|_Adam_W.__________________________________________________|_____29_|_71,553_|___3_|__3.78%_xxx

    _8_|_The_Doctor_______________________________________________|_____28_|_281,830_|___3_|__3.65%_xxx

    _9_|_Ray_Banana_______________________________________________|_____28_|_57,214_|___1_|__3.65%_xxx

    10_|_Scott_Dorsey_____________________________________________|_____28_|_45,169_|___0_|__3.65%_xxx

    11_|_Retro_Guy________________________________________________|_____21_|_45,204_|___0_|__2.74%_xx

    12_|_Olivier_Miakinen_________________________________________|_____20_|_48,903_|___0_|__2.61%_xx

    13_|_candycanearter07_________________________________________|_____19_|_46,709_|___0_|__2.48%_xx

    14_|_Marco_Moock______________________________________________|_____18_|_32,564_|___2_|__2.35%_xx

    15_|_Grant_Taylor_____________________________________________|_____16_|_67,774_|___0_|__2.09%_xx

    16_|_Tim_Skirvin______________________________________________|_____13_|_114,072_|__13_|__1.69%_x

    17_|_Sn!pe____________________________________________________|_____12_|_38,919_|___1_|__1.56%_x

    18_|_noel_____________________________________________________|_____12_|_23,563_|___0_|__1.56%_x_


    This is what I see in the source for the same lines of the article.

    _num|_Name_____________________________________________________|_Nb_Msg_|_ >> size____|_or._|_%
    ----|----------------------------------------------------------|--------|---------|-----|------------------|

    __1_|_Adam_H._Kerman___________________________________________|_____78_|_ >> 233,521_|___0_|_10.17%_xxxxxxxxxx
    __2_|_Eric_M___________________________________________________|_____63_|_ >> 132,990_|___0_|__8.21%_xxxxxxxx
    __3_|_llp______________________________________________________|_____59_|_ >> 161,222_|___4_|__7.69%_xxxxxxx
    __4_|_Frank_Slootweg___________________________________________|_____53_|_ >> 171,705_|___0_|__6.91%_xxxxxx
    __5_|_immibis__________________________________________________|_____40_|_ >> _84,571_|___0_|__5.22%_xxxxx
    __6_|_D________________________________________________________|_____30_|_ >> _50,274_|___6_|__3.91%_xxx
    __7_|_Adam_W.__________________________________________________|_____29_|_ >> _71,553_|___3_|__3.78%_xxx
    __8_|_The_Doctor_______________________________________________|_____28_|_ >> 281,830_|___3_|__3.65%_xxx
    __9_|_Ray_Banana_______________________________________________|_____28_|_ >> _57,214_|___1_|__3.65%_xxx
    _10_|_Scott_Dorsey_____________________________________________|_____28_|_ >> _45,169_|___0_|__3.65%_xxx
    _11_|_Retro_Guy________________________________________________|_____21_|_ >> _45,204_|___0_|__2.74%_xx
    _12_|_Olivier_Miakinen_________________________________________|_____20_|_ >> _48,903_|___0_|__2.61%_xx
    _13_|_candycanearter07_________________________________________|_____19_|_ >> _46,709_|___0_|__2.48%_xx
    _14_|_Marco_Moock______________________________________________|_____18_|_ >> _32,564_|___2_|__2.35%_xx
    _15_|_Grant_Taylor_____________________________________________|_____16_|_ >> _67,774_|___0_|__2.09%_xx
    _16_|_Tim_Skirvin______________________________________________|_____13_|_ >> 114,072_|__13_|__1.69%_x
    _17_|_Sn!pe____________________________________________________|_____12_|_ >> _38,919_|___1_|__1.56%_x
    _18_|_noel_____________________________________________________|_____12_|_ >> _23,563_|___0_|__1.56%_x

    Unwrapped source

    _num|_Name_____________________________________________________|_Nb_Msg_|_ >> size____|_or._|_%
    ----|----------------------------------------------------------|--------|---------|-----|------------------|

    __1_|_Adam_H._Kerman___________________________________________|_____78_|_233,521_|___0_|_10.17%_xxxxxxxxxx

    __2_|_Eric_M___________________________________________________|_____63_|_132,990_|___0_|__8.21%_xxxxxxxx

    __3_|_llp______________________________________________________|_____59_|_161,222_|___4_|__7.69%_xxxxxxx

    __4_|_Frank_Slootweg___________________________________________|_____53_|_171,705_|___0_|__6.91%_xxxxxx

    __5_|_immibis__________________________________________________|_____40_|_84,571_|___0_|__5.22%_xxxxx

    __6_|_D________________________________________________________|_____30_|_50,274_|___6_|__3.91%_xxx

    __7_|_Adam_W.__________________________________________________|_____29_|_71,553_|___3_|__3.78%_xxx

    __8_|_The_Doctor_______________________________________________|_____28_|_281,830_|___3_|__3.65%_xxx

    __9_|_Ray_Banana_______________________________________________|_____28_|_57,214_|___1_|__3.65%_xxx

    _10_|_Scott_Dorsey_____________________________________________|_____28_|_45,169_|___0_|__3.65%_xxx

    _11_|_Retro_Guy________________________________________________|_____21_|_45,204_|___0_|__2.74%_xx

    _12_|_Olivier_Miakinen_________________________________________|_____20_|_48,903_|___0_|__2.61%_xx

    _13_|_candycanearter07_________________________________________|_____19_|_46,709_|___0_|__2.48%_xx

    _14_|_Marco_Moock______________________________________________|_____18_|_32,564_|___2_|__2.35%_xx

    _15_|_Grant_Taylor_____________________________________________|_____16_|_67,774_|___0_|__2.09%_xx

    _16_|_Tim_Skirvin______________________________________________|_____13_|_114,072_|__13_|__1.69%_x

    _17_|_Sn!pe____________________________________________________|_____12_|_38,919_|___1_|__1.56%_x

    _18_|_noel_____________________________________________________|_____12_|_23,563_|___0_|__1.56%_x


    I also question the value of these messages.

    I similarly question the value of the Usenet FAQ and the monthly stats
    articles are far more numerous.  Sometimes they are even repeated in the
    same newsgroup.

    I've considered filtering them at my news server.  I just haven't found
    sufficient round-2-its to do so /yet/.

    These articles aren't discussions in and of themselves.  Just about
    every reply I've seen to them has been more of a complaint or discussion
    about the complaint.




    I'm using Seamonkey (which The Doctor does not recognise) and everything >looks fine apart from the "Subjects with most answers" table. All the >entries go over two lines. Big deal. Apart from that, this mail comes
    once every three months so what's the point in filtering it?

    Mail? do you what the difference between mail and a usenet post is?
    --
    Member - Liberal International This is [email protected] Ici [email protected]
    Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Doctor@21:1/5 to Blueshirt on Tue Apr 2 16:14:02 2024
    In article <[email protected]>,
    Blueshirt <[email protected]> wrote:
    Adam H. Kerman wrote:

    As yads is not going to bake me a cake, there is just no way
    to defend anything he does. Always deyadify.

    That's why newsreaders have Bozo Bins and filters... ;-)

    What cake does Adam want?
    --
    Member - Liberal International This is [email protected] Ici [email protected]
    Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Adam H. Kerman@21:1/5 to Blueshirt on Tue Apr 2 17:00:39 2024
    Blueshirt <[email protected]> wrote:
    Adam H. Kerman wrote:

    As yads is not going to bake me a cake, there is just no way
    to defend anything he does. Always deyadify.

    That's why newsreaders have Bozo Bins and filters... ;-)

    Killfiling in one newsgroup was less effective than I liked. I began to subscribe to a number of newsgroups from which regulars were
    crossposting into the newsgroup I read. I enter those newsgroups simply
    to mark everything as read, which includes references to crossposts in
    other newsgroups. To deyadify, I mark everything in rec.arts.drwho as
    read, so I'm junking your articles too. The main topic of that newsgroup
    is discussing yads, and crosspoting in followup to yads.

    But yads multiposts the useless statistics so I havent succeeded in
    deyadifying everywhere.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Olivier Miakinen@21:1/5 to All on Tue Apr 2 18:52:55 2024
    Le 02/04/2024 18:06, Olivier Miakinen a �crit :

    Of course, the newsreaders that are prepared (and configured to) understand the format flowed don't see any problem since it is preciseley the purpose
    of this format.

    Actually, it seems that there is also a (lesser) problem that only affects
    the newsreaders which accept the format flowed, because apparently your
    MesNews did not do the "space-stuffing" : <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2646#section-4.4>

    <cit. (only the first characters of the lines)>
    num| Name | Nb Msg | ----|----------------------------------------------------------|--------|
    1 | Adam H. Kerman | 78 | </cit.>

    In format flowed, the space before "num" should have been doubled, and the
    two spaces before "1" should have been three. Indeed, this indentation
    stays correct for those who don't accept format flowed for reading, but
    for the others it will be rendered shifted :

    <ex.>
    num| Name | Nb Msg | ----|----------------------------------------------------------|--------|
    1 | Adam H. Kerman | 78 |
    </ex.>

    --
    Olivier Miakinen

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Adam H. Kerman@21:1/5 to Blueshirt on Tue Apr 2 17:27:23 2024
    Blueshirt<[email protected]> wrote:
    Adam H. Kerman wrote:
    Blueshirt <[email protected]> wrote:
    Adam H. Kerman wrote:

    As yads is not going to bake me a cake, there is just no
    way to defend anything he does. Always deyadify.

    That's why newsreaders have Bozo Bins and filters... ;-)

    Killfiling in one newsgroup was less effective than I liked. I
    began to subscribe to a number of newsgroups from which
    regulars were crossposting into the newsgroup I read. I enter
    those newsgroups simply to mark everything as read, which
    includes references to crossposts in other newsgroups. To

    My killfile worked with Tim! Then Google decided to take over
    and do the job properly.

    Tim was prevented from crossposting by Google Groups; nothing to do with
    what I'm talking about.

    To deyadify, I mark everything in rec.arts.drwho as read, so
    I'm junking your articles too.

    I know I might have missed something... but, if you mark
    everything as read in a newsgroup without actually reading the
    posts, why bother subscribing to that group in the first place?!

    I am taking action against unwanted articles and unwanted entire threads
    being crossposted into a newsgroup that I want to read. Crossposting
    harms newsgroups. I junk the crossposted articles in a newsgroup that I
    don't want to read first, which updates references to the article in
    each newsgroup it was crossposted into. Then when I enter the newsgroup
    I want to read, there are no more unwanted crossposts. It was more
    effective than killfiling.

    . . .

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Blueshirt@21:1/5 to Adam H. Kerman on Tue Apr 2 19:17:47 2024
    Adam H. Kerman wrote:

    Blueshirt <[email protected]> wrote:
    Adam H. Kerman wrote:

    As yads is not going to bake me a cake, there is just no
    way to defend anything he does. Always deyadify.

    That's why newsreaders have Bozo Bins and filters... ;-)

    Killfiling in one newsgroup was less effective than I liked. I
    began to subscribe to a number of newsgroups from which
    regulars were crossposting into the newsgroup I read. I enter
    those newsgroups simply to mark everything as read, which
    includes references to crossposts in other newsgroups. To

    My killfile worked with Tim! Then Google decided to take over
    and do the job properly.

    To deyadify, I mark everything in rec.arts.drwho as read, so
    I'm junking your articles too.

    I know I might have missed something... but, if you mark
    everything as read in a newsgroup without actually reading the
    posts, why bother subscribing to that group in the first place?!

    The main topic of that newsgroup is discussing yads,
    and crosspoting in followup to yads.

    We're doing Easter today... call back in May when "Season One"
    airs!

    But yads multiposts the useless statistics so I havent
    succeeded in deyadifying everywhere.

    I say, aim for the top and demand cake !

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From candycanearter07@21:1/5 to Blueshirt on Tue Apr 2 19:00:13 2024
    Blueshirt <[email protected]> wrote at 15:56 this Tuesday (GMT):
    candycanearter07 wrote:

    Blueshirt <[email protected]> wrote at 10:12 this Tuesday
    (GMT):
    Grant Taylor wrote:

    I also question the value of these messages.

    Some people might find them informative.

    I enjoy looking at them, and they're easy to ignore/filter
    locally if you don't care.

    Exactly!

    I tend to ignore them mostly, but either way I wouldn't call
    stat posts abuse of Usenet.

    Now that we've lost the GG injected spam life on most newsgroups
    is fairly calm and a pleasure to peruse, so it is easy enough to
    just ignore the noise.


    Yeah, and thank goodness for that.
    --
    user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Doctor@21:1/5 to Blueshirt on Tue Apr 2 21:04:56 2024
    In article <[email protected]>,
    Blueshirt <[email protected]> wrote:
    Adam H. Kerman wrote:

    Blueshirt <[email protected]> wrote:
    Adam H. Kerman wrote:

    As yads is not going to bake me a cake, there is just no
    way to defend anything he does. Always deyadify.

    That's why newsreaders have Bozo Bins and filters... ;-)

    Killfiling in one newsgroup was less effective than I liked. I
    began to subscribe to a number of newsgroups from which
    regulars were crossposting into the newsgroup I read. I enter
    those newsgroups simply to mark everything as read, which
    includes references to crossposts in other newsgroups. To

    My killfile worked with Tim! Then Google decided to take over
    and do the job properly.

    To deyadify, I mark everything in rec.arts.drwho as read, so
    I'm junking your articles too.

    I know I might have missed something... but, if you mark
    everything as read in a newsgroup without actually reading the
    posts, why bother subscribing to that group in the first place?!

    The main topic of that newsgroup is discussing yads,
    and crosspoting in followup to yads.

    We're doing Easter today... call back in May when "Season One"
    airs!

    But yads multiposts the useless statistics so I havent
    succeeded in deyadifying everywhere.

    I say, aim for the top and demand cake !


    What cake would you like?
    --
    Member - Liberal International This is [email protected] Ici [email protected]
    Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Grant Taylor@21:1/5 to Adam H. Kerman on Tue Apr 2 22:55:20 2024
    On 4/2/24 12:27, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
    I junk the crossposted articles in a newsgroup that I don't want to
    read first, which updates references to the article in each newsgroup
    it was crossposted into. Then when I enter the newsgroup I want to
    read, there are no more unwanted crossposts. It was more effective
    than killfiling.

    I think you're relying on a feature that inferior news client's don't
    have. That being when you mark a messages that is cross posted to
    multiple groups as read in one group, it is also marked as read in the
    other newsgroups that it's cross posted to.



    --
    Grant. . . .

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Grant Taylor@21:1/5 to Olivier Miakinen on Tue Apr 2 23:06:38 2024
    On 4/2/24 11:06, Olivier Miakinen wrote:
    The problem is with the format flowed, which makes impossible to send
    lines of more than 79 characters as soon as they contain at least
    one space. See <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2646>.

    It may be related to format flowed. But I don't believe that format
    flowed prevents lines of more than 79 characters.... There are
    conventions about what character count on the line to do the format
    flowed split. But a convention is a convention and can be changed.
    I've done format flowed at 25 characters and I've done format flowed at
    256 characters.

    The logical line is as long as the window will support if there is
    enough source data to fill the line.

    The physical line is at or below the character count as long as there is
    a space character to break / wrap the line.

    Of course, the newsreaders that are prepared (and configured to)
    understand the format flowed don't see any problem

    Um, flag on the post. I'm using format flowed and I do see the problem.

    Perhaps your algorithm is correct but the input and output is reversed?

    since it is preciseley the purpose of this format. But for older
    newsreaders, or for users who deactivate this format they dislike,
    the mangling is real : <https://i.goopics.net/vruq6c.png>.

    That is much more severe mangling than I see.

    The errors that I'm seeing aren't at the wrap point for format flowed
    either. What I'm seeing is most evident between the 4th & 5th and the
    5th & 6th columns. What should probably be a straight line of pipe
    characters isn't. This is in both the format flow unwrapped logical
    line from multiple physical lines and the physical lines in the message
    source.



    --
    Grant. . . .

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Grant Taylor@21:1/5 to R Daneel Olivaw on Tue Apr 2 22:50:25 2024
    On 4/2/24 03:07, R Daneel Olivaw wrote:
    Apart from that, this mail comes once every three months so what's the
    point in filtering it?

    Seeing 30-60 of them at a time across as many newsgroups quickly gets
    annoying.



    --
    Grant. . . .

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Grant Taylor@21:1/5 to All on Tue Apr 2 23:24:48 2024
    On 4/2/24 10:40, candycanearter07 wrote:
    I enjoy looking at them, and they're easy to ignore/filter locally
    if you don't care.

    Mostly, and not as much as one might hope.

    Either I have to duplicate the filter (to mark the messages as read)
    across many, but not all, newsgroups, or I have to do it at the news
    server level to apply to all newsgroups.

    The Doctor usually has enough content to keep from being ignored
    completely. But my usual M.O. is to block senders and not have a more
    custom filter that is sender and subject.

    Maybe I can do a filter that is subject starts with stats. But that
    feels overly simplistic.

    If other people find value in the messages, then so be it. I'll filter
    them.



    --
    Grant. . . .

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Grant Taylor@21:1/5 to Olivier Miakinen on Tue Apr 2 23:19:13 2024
    On 4/2/24 11:52, Olivier Miakinen wrote:
    Actually, it seems that there is also a (lesser) problem that only affects the newsreaders which accept the format flowed, because apparently your MesNews did not do the "space-stuffing" : <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2646#section-4.4>

    <cit. (only the first characters of the lines)>
    num| Name | Nb Msg | ----|----------------------------------------------------------|--------|
    1 | Adam H. Kerman | 78 | </cit.>

    This more aptly describes what I'm seeing.

    My news reader does format flowed.

    In format flowed, the space before "num" should have been doubled, and the two spaces before "1" should have been three. Indeed, this indentation
    stays correct for those who don't accept format flowed for reading, but
    for the others it will be rendered shifted :

    <ex.>
    num| Name | Nb Msg | ----|----------------------------------------------------------|--------|
    1 | Adam H. Kerman | 78 | </ex.>

    I want to agree, but I think what you say is contrary to section 4.4 of
    RFC 2646 which you linked to.

    Space-stuffing adds a single space to the start of any line which
    needs protection when the message is generated.

    Okay.

    On reception, if the first character of a line is a space, it is
    logically deleted.

    Okay.

    This occurs after the test for a quoted line, and before the test
    for a flowed line.

    Hum. So the logical deletion "occurs after the test for a quoted line".

    But the lines in The Doctor's original message aren't quoted. Maybe
    it's a difference in what "a quoted line" is.

    Section 4.5 of RFC 2464 defines quoting as "one or more close angle
    brackets (">").

    Aside: I'm used to seeing the space after the close angle bracket, but
    maybe that's just convention and not a technical requirement.



    --
    Grant. . . .

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Olivier Miakinen@21:1/5 to All on Wed Apr 3 10:58:13 2024
    Le 03/04/2024 06:06, Grant Taylor m'a r�pondu :

    The problem is with the format flowed, which makes impossible to send
    lines of more than 79 characters as soon as they contain at least
    one space. See <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2646>.

    It may be related to format flowed. But I don't believe that format
    flowed prevents lines of more than 79 characters.... There are
    conventions about what character count on the line to do the format
    flowed split. But a convention is a convention and can be changed.
    I've done format flowed at 25 characters and I've done format flowed at
    256 characters.

    Indeed, even though it is not a mere convention in RFC 2646, it is a
    SHOULD and not a MUST. According to BCP 14 (RFC 2119) it *may exist*
    valid reasons to ignore this SHOULD, and the specific configuration of
    a newsreader may be considered to be a valid reason.

    So, The Doctor could consider extending the maximum length before sending
    their stats (here I do not discuss on the subject to the interest of such stats, another discussion exists in parallel).


    [...]

    Of course, the newsreaders that are prepared (and configured to)
    understand the format flowed don't see any problem

    Um, flag on the post. I'm using format flowed and I do see the problem.

    At the time of my first post, I had only seen the *big* problem for those
    who do not accept the format flowed in reading. But afterwards I saw
    another (lesser) problem for those who read the format flowed. I tried
    to launch a discussion about this bug in a French-speaking newsgroup
    because the developer of MesNews is French, but I believe that Arnaud does
    not really support this software anymore.


    Best Regards,
    --
    Olivier Miakinen

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Olivier Miakinen@21:1/5 to All on Wed Apr 3 11:26:11 2024
    Le 03/04/2024 06:19, Grant Taylor a �crit :
    On 4/2/24 11:52, Olivier Miakinen wrote:
    Actually, it seems that there is also a (lesser) problem that only affects >> the newsreaders which accept the format flowed, because apparently your
    MesNews did not do the "space-stuffing" :
    <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2646#section-4.4>

    <cit. (only the first characters of the lines)>
    num| Name | Nb Msg | >> ----|----------------------------------------------------------|--------|
    1 | Adam H. Kerman | 78 | >> </cit.>

    This more aptly describes what I'm seeing.

    My news reader does format flowed.

    In format flowed, the space before "num" should have been doubled, and the >> two spaces before "1" should have been three. Indeed, this indentation
    stays correct for those who don't accept format flowed for reading, but
    for the others it will be rendered shifted :

    <ex.>
    num| Name | Nb Msg |
    ----|----------------------------------------------------------|--------|
    1 | Adam H. Kerman | 78 |
    </ex.>

    I want to agree, but I think what you say is contrary to section 4.4 of
    RFC 2646 which you linked to.

    It is rather difficult to discuss about this format, between you who uses it and me who does not. Rather than giving examples (because they will probably
    be mangled), I prefer explaining the rules and how they are respected or not.


    1) Flowed-aware softwares (without bug) sending format=flowed
    Sender MUST space-stuff lines, in particular double any leading space.
    And lines that are too long can be breaked with soft-breaks.

    2) Flowed-aware softwares which receive format=flowed
    They remove any leading space, thus undoing the space-stuff. So the lines
    are correctly aligned if the space-stuffing was correctly done.
    And they also join lines having soft-breaks, thus reconstituting original
    long lines.

    3) Non flowed-aware softwares which receive format=flowed
    They do not remove the leading spaces, so there can be a misalignment
    between lines which begin with a space and lines which don't.
    Also they do not join lines having soft breaks, thus mangling the
    expected result.


    1bis) The Doctor's MesNews
    The lines that are too long were breaked with soft-breaks.
    But the lines beginning with a space were *not* space-stuffed.

    2bis) Flowed-aware softwares which receive The Doctor's post
    The lines are correctly joined.
    But there is a misalignment between lines according to the presence
    or absence of a leading space.

    3bis) Non flowed-aware softwares which receive The Doctor's post
    The lines are not joined, hence the big mangling.
    However the identation is correct between lines according to the
    presence or absence of a leading space.


    Final note : as you said, the lines in The Doctor's message aren't
    quoted, hence the rules of RFC 2646 concerning quotations are
    irrelevant to the bug that I pointed out.


    Best Regards,
    --
    Olivier Miakinen

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Doctor@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Wed Apr 3 14:52:05 2024
    In article <uuj5n6$mie$[email protected]>,
    Olivier Miakinen <[email protected]> wrote:
    Le 03/04/2024 06:06, Grant Taylor m'a r�pondu :

    The problem is with the format flowed, which makes impossible to send
    lines of more than 79 characters as soon as they contain at least
    one space. See <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2646>.

    It may be related to format flowed. But I don't believe that format
    flowed prevents lines of more than 79 characters.... There are
    conventions about what character count on the line to do the format
    flowed split. But a convention is a convention and can be changed.
    I've done format flowed at 25 characters and I've done format flowed at
    256 characters.

    Indeed, even though it is not a mere convention in RFC 2646, it is a
    SHOULD and not a MUST. According to BCP 14 (RFC 2119) it *may exist*
    valid reasons to ignore this SHOULD, and the specific configuration of
    a newsreader may be considered to be a valid reason.

    So, The Doctor could consider extending the maximum length before sending >their stats (here I do not discuss on the subject to the interest of such >stats, another discussion exists in parallel).


    Extending the maximum length?

    It is set to infinity.


    [...]

    Of course, the newsreaders that are prepared (and configured to)
    understand the format flowed don't see any problem

    Um, flag on the post. I'm using format flowed and I do see the problem.

    At the time of my first post, I had only seen the *big* problem for those
    who do not accept the format flowed in reading. But afterwards I saw
    another (lesser) problem for those who read the format flowed. I tried
    to launch a discussion about this bug in a French-speaking newsgroup
    because the developer of MesNews is French, but I believe that Arnaud does >not really support this software anymore.


    Best Regards,
    --
    Olivier Miakinen


    --
    Member - Liberal International This is [email protected] Ici [email protected]
    Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From candycanearter07@21:1/5 to Grant Taylor on Wed Apr 3 14:50:12 2024
    Grant Taylor <[email protected]> wrote at 04:24 this Wednesday (GMT):
    On 4/2/24 10:40, candycanearter07 wrote:
    I enjoy looking at them, and they're easy to ignore/filter locally
    if you don't care.

    Mostly, and not as much as one might hope.

    Either I have to duplicate the filter (to mark the messages as read)
    across many, but not all, newsgroups, or I have to do it at the news
    server level to apply to all newsgroups.

    The Doctor usually has enough content to keep from being ignored
    completely. But my usual M.O. is to block senders and not have a more
    custom filter that is sender and subject.

    Maybe I can do a filter that is subject starts with stats. But that
    feels overly simplistic.

    If other people find value in the messages, then so be it. I'll filter
    them.




    Maybe "stats 202"? or "stats 202[0-9]" if your reader supports regex.
    Then again, you would have to change it in 6 years.
    --
    user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Olivier Miakinen@21:1/5 to All on Thu Apr 4 00:06:13 2024
    Le 03/04/2024 16:52, The Doctor m'a r�pondu :

    So, The Doctor could consider extending the maximum length before sending >>their stats (here I do not discuss on the subject to the interest of such >>stats, another discussion exists in parallel).

    Extending the maximum length?

    It is set to infinity.

    That is impossible.

    For starters, a newsreader MUST limit each physical line to 998 bytes.
    By the way, if you look at the source code of your initial article, you will see that only the lines which consist only of "-" and "|" characters (with
    no space character) are left intact without any line break : <http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=171218132600>.

    Thanks to a user on fr.test, I have a copy of the configuration page of
    MesNews dealing with the creation of messages. I don't know if you have
    that in another language than French, but in French the corresponding
    item is the following :
    Nombre de caract�res par ligne [72 ]
    See : <https://lutim.lagout.org/8RPdu3LF/d8DItfdC.png>.

    However, I have pointed out four bugs in MesNews, so if your are allowed
    to continue sending statistics, you'd better send them via trn rather than
    via MesNews. I do not have the courage to translate my article into English, but if you read French you can see all that in the following article : <news:uukirr$16ua$[email protected]>.

    Best Regards,
    --
    Olivier Miakinen

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Adam H. Kerman@21:1/5 to Grant Taylor on Wed Apr 3 22:17:29 2024
    Grant Taylor <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 4/2/24 12:27, Adam H. Kerman wrote:

    I junk the crossposted articles in a newsgroup that I don't want to
    read first, which updates references to the article in each newsgroup
    it was crossposted into. Then when I enter the newsgroup I want to
    read, there are no more unwanted crossposts. It was more effective
    than killfiling.

    I think you're relying on a feature that inferior news client's don't
    have. That being when you mark a messages that is cross posted to
    multiple groups as read in one group, it is also marked as read in the
    other newsgroups that it's cross posted to.

    Seriously? I had no idea users put up with newsreaders that don't chase references.

    Then why do I get so much grief for using trn4? It makes reading Usenet
    ever so much more enjoyable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Grant Taylor@21:1/5 to Olivier Miakinen on Wed Apr 3 20:18:22 2024
    On 4/3/24 03:58, Olivier Miakinen wrote:
    Indeed, even though it is not a mere convention in RFC 2646, it is a
    SHOULD and not a MUST. According to BCP 14 (RFC 2119) it *may exist*
    valid reasons to ignore this SHOULD, and the specific configuration
    of a newsreader may be considered to be a valid reason.

    Without reading the specific RFC sections I acknowledge and concede that
    there is very strong suggestions / encouragement to use specific values.

    That being said, there are people doing things they should not do all of
    the time. }:-)

    At the time of my first post, I had only seen the *big* problem for
    those who do not accept the format flowed in reading. But afterwards I
    saw another (lesser) problem for those who read the format flowed.

    ACK



    --
    Grant. . . .

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Doctor@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Thu Apr 4 01:37:23 2024
    In article <uukv6g$36p$[email protected]>,
    Grant Taylor <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 4/3/24 09:52, The Doctor wrote:
    Extending the maximum length?

    There is something wrapping lines in your messages. If it's not your
    news client doing it, then something else is modifying your posts.



    I have a field set to 0 so that wrapping
    is not cutting data off.


    --
    Grant. . . .


    --
    Member - Liberal International This is [email protected] Ici [email protected]
    Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Grant Taylor@21:1/5 to Olivier Miakinen on Wed Apr 3 20:27:30 2024
    On 4/3/24 04:26, Olivier Miakinen wrote:
    It is rather difficult to discuss about this format, between you who
    uses it and me who does not. Rather than giving examples (because
    they will probably be mangled), I prefer explaining the rules and
    how they are respected or not.

    ACK

    I'll say that I've been both using and advocating for foramt=flowed for
    many decades.

    I even have a script that I run that will (re)flow content in the clipboard.

    I go out of my way to use format=flowed.

    1) Flowed-aware softwares (without bug) sending format=flowed Sender
    MUST space-stuff lines, in particular double any leading space.
    And lines that are too long can be breaked with soft-breaks.

    I'd have to go back to RFCs to know for sure, but I think there is some criteria for when space stuffing is and is not done.

    I thought, but could be misremembering, it had to do with if the
    previous physical line ends with a space or not.

    2) Flowed-aware softwares which receive format=flowed They remove any
    leading space, thus undoing the space-stuff. So the lines are correctly aligned if the space-stuffing was correctly done. And they also join
    lines having soft-breaks, thus reconstituting original long lines.

    Same as above, I thought there was criteria for when to undo space stuffing.

    3) Non flowed-aware softwares which receive format=flowed They do
    not remove the leading spaces, so there can be a misalignment between
    lines which begin with a space and lines which don't. Also they do
    not join lines having soft breaks, thus mangling the expected result.

    ACK

    1bis) The Doctor's MesNews
    The lines that are too long were breaked with soft-breaks. But the
    lines beginning with a space were *not* space-stuffed.

    2bis) Flowed-aware softwares which receive The Doctor's post
    The lines are correctly joined. But there is a misalignment between
    lines according to the presence or absence of a leading space.

    I have seen some issue related to leading spaces / space stuffing.

    But that doesn't account for content that's all on a given physical
    line. Admittedly the cases that I've seen in this thread are latter
    halfs of long lines that have been broken. But the misalignment is
    within a physical line. This is most apparent with the number of spaces
    around numbers in latter columns of the stats.

    3bis) Non flowed-aware softwares which receive The Doctor's post
    The lines are not joined, hence the big mangling. However the
    identation is correct between lines according to the presence or
    absence of a leading space.

    ACK

    Final note : as you said, the lines in The Doctor's message aren't
    quoted, hence the rules of RFC 2646 concerning quotations are
    irrelevant to the bug that I pointed out.

    ;-)



    --
    Grant. . . .

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Grant Taylor@21:1/5 to The Doctor on Wed Apr 3 20:19:12 2024
    On 4/3/24 09:52, The Doctor wrote:
    Extending the maximum length?

    There is something wrapping lines in your messages. If it's not your
    news client doing it, then something else is modifying your posts.



    --
    Grant. . . .

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Grant Taylor@21:1/5 to The Doctor on Wed Apr 3 22:30:56 2024
    On 4/3/24 20:37, The Doctor wrote:
    I have a field set to 0 so that wrapping
    is not cutting data off.

    Wrapping should never cut off data or cause data loss. Wrapping will
    just cause some part of it to be on the next line.

    Have you looked at the source of the messages that we're discussing? Do
    you see what we're talking about in the message source?



    --
    Grant. . . .

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alfred Peters@21:1/5 to All on Thu Apr 4 12:35:16 2024
    Es schrieb einmal The Doctor:
    In article <[email protected]>,

    The Doctor wrote:

    Statistics : from 1/1/2024 to 3/31/2024

    How did I mangle it?

    The problem is that you are sending a formatted table as "format=flowed".

    With a reader that does not support this, it looks very broken. I have
    switched it off for demonstration purposes:

    Screenshot 2024-04-04 121326.png Size: 26,8 KB <https://app.box.com/s/8lyxwiw8367924u31fil1fd7hc42rwe4>

    But even with activated "format=flowed" the table is not aligned
    correctly, because at least Thunderbird then eats up some spaces:

    Screenshot 2024-04-04 122923.png Size: 37,8 KB <https://app.box.com/s/ec063dgkzt5szlsfk8w93ttagwbu6ayw>

    Alfred
    --
    🀆🀟🀒 24258.2
    🀏🀣🀒🀚🀕🀘🀉
    🀟🀆🀕🀘🀏
    🀛🀛🀚🀣🀉

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From llp@21:1/5 to All on Thu Apr 4 19:49:49 2024
    Grant Taylor a �crit :
    On 4/3/24 04:26, Olivier Miakinen wrote:

    [cut: A discussion about a newsreader bug or not]

    Isn't there a more appropriate thematic group to talk about this ?

    --
    Admin of news.usenet.ovh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Olivier Miakinen@21:1/5 to All on Thu Apr 4 20:22:01 2024
    Le 04/04/2024 19:49, llp a �crit :
    Grant Taylor a �crit :
    On 4/3/24 04:26, Olivier Miakinen wrote:

    [cut: A discussion about a newsreader bug or not]

    Isn't there a more appropriate thematic group to talk about this ?

    In the French-speaking hierarchy, yes. I proposed tests on fr.test, and reported
    the bugs found on fr.comp.usenet.lecteurs-de-news. And your question, in the French-speaking hierarchy, would have been on-topic on fr.bienvenue.

    But on the Big8 I don't know. If you have suggestions, please feel free to
    tell what they are. Though it is a bit too late now for the tests and the
    bug reports because all the answers have already been given, don't hesitate
    to share your thoughts.

    fr.test -> ?
    fr.comp.usenet.lecteurs-de-news -> ?
    fr.bienvenue -> ?

    Also, don't forget to do a crosspost and a followup to this equivalent of fr.bienvenue, this group which would be appropriate for any question on the form "which is the appropriate thematic group for a given subject".

    Best Regards,
    --
    Olivier Miakinen

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From llp@21:1/5 to All on Thu Apr 4 22:53:22 2024
    Olivier Miakinen vient de nous annoncer :
    Le 04/04/2024 19:49, llp a �crit :
    Grant Taylor a �crit :
    On 4/3/24 04:26, Olivier Miakinen wrote:
    [cut: A discussion about a newsreader bug or not]

    Isn't there a more appropriate thematic group to talk about this ?

    In the French-speaking hierarchy, yes. I proposed [cut blabla]

    But on the Big8 I don't know.

    Your answer must be an April 1st joke because I can't believe
    you've lied again, like on "fr" hierarchy [1]

    You've already posted on news.software.readers and news.software.nntp
    So you know the big8.

    Best Regards.





    [1] A lie: <uu3i88$m6f$[email protected]>
    and the proof of lies: <uu72tp$f4vm$[email protected]>

    --
    Admin of news.usenet.ovh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Michael =?ISO-8859-1?Q?B=E4uerle?=@21:1/5 to Alfred Peters on Fri Apr 5 13:33:03 2024
    Alfred Peters wrote:
    Es schrieb einmal The Doctor:
    In article <[email protected]>,
    The Doctor wrote:

    Statistics : from 1/1/2024 to 3/31/2024

    How did I mangle it?

    The problem is that you are sending a formatted table as "format=flowed".

    With a reader that does not support this, it looks very broken. I have switched it off for demonstration purposes:

    Screenshot 2024-04-04 121326.png Size: 26,8 KB <https://app.box.com/s/8lyxwiw8367924u31fil1fd7hc42rwe4>

    But even with activated "format=flowed" the table is not aligned
    correctly, because at least Thunderbird then eats up some spaces:

    Screenshot 2024-04-04 122923.png Size: 37,8 KB <https://app.box.com/s/ec063dgkzt5szlsfk8w93ttagwbu6ayw>

    The problem are the paragraphs in the table (that a recepient is
    allowed to rewrap to arbitrary width). This can make it look broken differently, depending on the rewrap width that is used by the
    recepient.
    With flowed format a table should consist of fixed lines only
    (this means no line of the table should end with SP).

    The problem with the space-stuffing can be mitigated by stuffing all
    lines of a table. RFC 3676 explicitly allows to space-stuff any line.
    A flowed-decoder will remove the stuffing as defined by RFC 3676.
    Without a flowed-decoder the whole table will be indented one character
    to the right (but stays readable with correctly aligned lines).

    In this case the original article does not contain text for which the
    paragraph system with rewrapping makes sense. The fixed format looks
    more suitable for such content.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)