1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. NEWS.ADMIN.NET-ABUSE.USEN

  • [OT] Re: UDP Google GRoups

    From Sn!pe@21:1/5 to Ray Banana on Sun Oct 22 12:56:03 2023
    Ray Banana <[email protected]> wrote:

    Thus spake [email protected] (Sn!pe)

    Marc Haber <[email protected]> wrote:
    [email protected] (Sn!pe) wrote:
    I am not aware of any of my legitimate mail in any of my several Gmail
    accounts having been lost or delayed.
    I am.
    YMMV! ≈:o)

    The receiver does not get notified, it's only the sender:

    <[email protected]>: host
    gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[2607:f8b0:4004:c17::1a] said: 550-5.7.26 This
    mail has been blocked because the sender is unauthenticated. 550-5.7.26
    Gmail requires all senders to authenticate with either SPF or DKIM.
    550-5.7.26 550-5.7.26 Authentication results: 550-5.7.26 DKIM = did not
    pass 550-5.7.26 SPF [raybanana.net] with ip:
    [2a01:238:4322:f100:97c6:a04c:74ee:429e 550-5.7.26 ] = did not pass
    550-5.7.26 550-5.7.26 To mitigate this issue, please visit Gmail's
    authentication guide 550-5.7.26 for instructions on setting up
    authentication: 550 5.7.26
    https://support.google.com/mail/answer/81126#authentication
    g13-20020ac8580d000000b0041986eba0b0si3340575qtg.396 - gsmtp (in reply to
    end of DATA command)

    Noted, thanks, Ray.

    Whatever, I'm still not aware of any ~expected~ mail having gone astray.
    I use Google Mail with IMAP and Mac OS 14.0 Mail.app. FWIW I'm 2FA on
    all my Gmail accounts, in case that's relevant.

    I think discussion of email is probably OT here. (Subject. marked)

    --
    ^Ï^. Sn!pe, PA, FIBS - Professional Crastinator.

    My pet rock Gordon just is.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Eric M@21:1/5 to All on Sun Oct 22 13:59:01 2023
    Le 22/10/2023 à 13:56, [email protected] (Sn!pe) a écrit :

    Whatever, I'm still not aware of any ~expected~ mail having gone astray.

    Ray wrote to me and I didn't get the message :)
    Maybe I should change this adress although it is useful against spam.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Sn!pe@21:1/5 to Eric M on Sun Oct 22 15:41:47 2023
    Eric M <[email protected]> wrote:

    Le 22/10/2023 � 13:56, [email protected] (Sn!pe) a �crit :

    Whatever, I'm still not aware of any ~expected~ mail having gone astray.

    Ray wrote to me and I didn't get the message :)
    Maybe I should change this adress although it is useful against spam.

    I hardly ever see spam to my Usenet addresses: <[email protected]>
    and <[email protected]>. In fact the only spam to them is what Gmail
    is currently sending directly to my spam mailbox, namely Paganini's test autoresponder stuff.

    --
    ^�^. Sn!pe, PA, FIBS - Professional Crastinator.

    My pet rock Gordon just is.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ray Banana@21:1/5 to All on Sun Oct 22 17:04:20 2023
    Thus spake [email protected] (Sn!pe)

    Eric M <[email protected]> wrote:
    Le 22/10/2023 à 13:56, [email protected] (Sn!pe) a écrit :
    Whatever, I'm still not aware of any ~expected~ mail having gone astray. >> Ray wrote to me and I didn't get the message :)
    Maybe I should change this adress although it is useful against spam.
    I hardly ever see spam to my Usenet addresses: <[email protected]>
    and <[email protected]>. In fact the only spam to them is what Gmail
    is currently sending directly to my spam mailbox, namely Paganini's test autoresponder stuff.

    Google seems to switch their email security settings a lot recently.
    At the moment, it's not testing SPF and DKIM. They're worse than Elon
    Musk as far as testing in production is concerned.

    --
    Пу́тін — хуйло́
    http://www.eternal-september.org

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Doctor@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Mon Oct 23 00:22:34 2023
    In article <[email protected]>,
    Ray Banana <[email protected]> wrote:
    Thus spake [email protected] (Sn!pe)

    Eric M <[email protected]> wrote:
    Le 22/10/2023 à 13:56, [email protected] (Sn!pe) a écrit :
    Whatever, I'm still not aware of any ~expected~ mail having gone astray. >>> Ray wrote to me and I didn't get the message :)
    Maybe I should change this adress although it is useful against spam.
    I hardly ever see spam to my Usenet addresses: <[email protected]>
    and <[email protected]>. In fact the only spam to them is what Gmail
    is currently sending directly to my spam mailbox, namely Paganini's test
    autoresponder stuff.

    Google seems to switch their email security settings a lot recently.
    At the moment, it's not testing SPF and DKIM. They're worse than Elon
    Musk as far as testing in production is concerned.


    Google is sure dropping the ball!

    --
    Пу́тін — хуйло́
    http://www.eternal-september.org


    --
    Member - Liberal International This is [email protected] Ici [email protected]
    Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen When pride is the most valuable thing, then the life will be misery. -unknown Beware https://mindspring.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)