Daniel wrote:
Will a UseNet group (similar to those that I think are being set up
for FF and TB) be set up for SM??
At the moment, I'm just putting out feelers, if there's "enough"
interest, I'll go ahead and create them and request newsadmins to carry
them.
I'm not directly interested in seamonkey, but if you adapt my proposal
to suit, and it gets support, I'll do a three-for-two deal :-)
Daniel wrote:
Will a UseNet group (similar to those that I think are being set up
for FF and TB) be set up for SM??
At the moment, I'm just putting out feelers, if there's "enough"
interest, I'll go ahead and create them and request newsadmins to carry
them.
I'm not directly interested in seamonkey, but if you adapt my proposal
to suit, and it gets support, I'll do a three-for-two deal :-)
Andy Burns wrote:
I'm not directly interested in seamonkey, but if you adapt my proposal
to suit, and it gets support, I'll do a three-for-two deal :-)
I'm interested.
I have only used SeaMonkey or it's Netscape predecessors to access the internet. I find USENET much more practical than browser accessed fora.
Richard Owlett wrote:
Andy Burns wrote:
I'm not directly interested in seamonkey, but if you adapt my
proposal to suit, and it gets support, I'll do a three-for-two deal :-)
I'm interested.
I have only used SeaMonkey or it's Netscape predecessors to access
the internet. I find USENET much more practical than browser accessed
fora.
Is the existence of n.p.m.seamonkey sufficient for you guys, so that a
new alt.comp.software.seamonkey isn't required?
On the news-server news.aioe.org
I see mozilla.support.seamonkey
Will this also be removed soon ?
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 715 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 06:23:52 |
| Calls: | 12,100 |
| Calls today: | 8 |
| Files: | 15,003 |
| Messages: | 6,517,919 |
| Posted today: | 1 |