Stuart O. Bronstein <
[email protected]> wrote:
"Adam H. Kerman" <[email protected]> wrote:
If under state law an individual or business corporation is
allowed to be a member of a nonprofit LLC, I just don't see how it
would be determined to be an exempt organization under federal tax
law.
Individuals can be members of nonprofits too.
You know, you removed the context by failing to retain the quote. You
changed the meaning. Please don't do that.
The quote from the article was specific to 501(c)(3). Yes, they can have members but under federal tax law, the members must not own the entity.
Assets must not be transferred to members.
Let's say I'm a long-time member of an art museum. I'm a big-money
donor. I decide that I want to repurpose the monies I've given over the
years. I can't just say, I quit my membership, then grab a valuable
painting off the wall as my share. I can't take my equity out. Owners
equity isn't a bookkeeping concept in this type of entity.
In the next paragraph, I mentioned two examples of entities that can
receive recognition under 501 in which the members do have ownership --
life insurance 501(c)(12) and mutual financial organizations 501(c)(14)
-- but doubted it would be desireable to set up either one as a
nonprofit LLC under state law even if it were allowed.
Getting back to a hypothetical 501(c)(3) set up as an LLC:
For an LLC to be a nonprofit state law would prohibit the members from
having any rights other than to select the managers.
It's more than not having rights. In LLC law, "member" is simply the
term used in lieu of "shareholder" or "partner", but a "member" is one
of the owners.
If the state had a nonprofit LLC law, and the members of the LLC were individuals and businesses, then the law would have to allow its
organizing documents to state that the members are not owners.
If an LLC's membership comprises individuals and businesses that are
not owners, how could it possibly be an LLC owned by no one at all?
The Articles of Organization and
Operating Agreement would also have to be consistent with being a
nonprofit. I don't know for certain if any states have done that, but
I have a vague recollection of hearing about one state that provided
that possibility.
With members as individuals and businesses? I'd love to read the
statutory language and see how it could be made to work together with
federal tax law.
--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
<< nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties >>
<< that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts >>
<< to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy >>
<< are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2011) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)