1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. MISC.SURVIVALISM

  • Re: Brain Damaged Leftist Wants To Ban Guns. Period

    From !Jones@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Mon May 1 20:29:15 2023
    XPost: rec.crafts.metalworking, talk.politics.guns, alt.politics
    XPost: alt.rush-limbaugh

    On Sat, 29 Apr 2023 19:45:21 -0700, in talk.politics.guns Alan Bond <[email protected]> wrote:

    Nope. I just happen to be right about you. You want to ban all privately owned
    guns. You believe there is no individual right to arms. You are wrong, of >course. There absolutely *is* an individual right to arms, specifically guns.

    And, can you support that with logic?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From !Jones@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Mon May 1 21:30:06 2023
    XPost: rec.crafts.metalworking, talk.politics.guns, alt.politics
    XPost: alt.rush-limbaugh

    On Mon, 01 May 2023 20:29:15 -0500, in talk.politics.guns !Jones
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    On Sat, 29 Apr 2023 19:45:21 -0700, in talk.politics.guns Alan Bond ><[email protected]> wrote:

    Nope. I just happen to be right about you. You want to ban all privately owned
    guns. You believe there is no individual right to arms. You are wrong, of >>course. There absolutely *is* an individual right to arms, specifically guns.

    And, can you support that with logic?

    Let's assume, for the sake of discussion, that there exists such a
    thing as a human right. Further, suppose one of these hypothetical
    ideas bit me on the hand. How would I identify it as a "human right"?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scout@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Tue May 2 08:44:28 2023
    XPost: rec.crafts.metalworking, talk.politics.guns, alt.politics
    XPost: alt.rush-limbaugh

    "!Jones" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
    On Mon, 01 May 2023 20:29:15 -0500, in talk.politics.guns !Jones
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    On Sat, 29 Apr 2023 19:45:21 -0700, in talk.politics.guns Alan Bond >><[email protected]> wrote:

    Nope. I just happen to be right about you. You want to ban all >>>privately owned
    guns. You believe there is no individual right to arms. You are wrong, >>>of
    course. There absolutely *is* an individual right to arms, specifically >>>guns.

    And, can you support that with logic?

    Let's assume, for the sake of discussion, that there exists such a
    thing as a human right.

    Which also indicates that Jones thinks Humans have no rights...

    Which means murdering him, wouldn't violate his rights since according to
    him he has none.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rudy Crayola@21:1/5 to Scout on Tue May 2 14:47:29 2023
    XPost: rec.crafts.metalworking, talk.politics.guns, alt.politics
    XPost: alt.rush-limbaugh

    On 5/2/2023 8:44 AM, Scout wrote:


    "!Jones" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
    On Mon, 01 May 2023 20:29:15 -0500, in talk.politics.guns !Jones
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    On Sat, 29 Apr 2023 19:45:21 -0700, in talk.politics.guns Alan Bond
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    Nope.  I just happen to be right about you.  You want to ban all
    privately owned
    guns.  You believe there is no individual right to arms.  You are
    wrong, of
    course.  There absolutely *is* an individual right to arms,
    specifically guns.

    And, can you support that with logic?

    Let's assume, for the sake of discussion, that there exists such a
    thing as a human right.

    Which also indicates that Jones thinks Humans have no rights...

    Which means murdering him, wouldn't violate his rights since according
    to him he has none.


    Hmmm? OK, go ahead. But you have to clean up the mess and pay the fine
    for dumping toxic waste.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)